Abstract
BACKGROUND
Interventional embolization is an important method for the treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding , which can effectively stop bleeding and improve the success rate of treatment. At present, the effect of interventional embolization in the treatment of massive bleeding from gastrointestinal ulcer caused by antiplatelet drugs in elderly patients has been confirmed in many studies, but the incidence of postoperative rebleeding is high, and there are many influencing factors for rebleeding. There are still 10%-30% of patients with rebleeding, which is a serious threat to their life safety, and the results are different across studies and reports. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the influencing factors for rebleeding in patients with gastrointestinal ulcer bleeding caused by antiplatelet drugs after interventional embolization through single and multi-factor methods, so as to provide a reference for future clinical treatment.
AIM
To investigate the effect of interventional embolization in the treatment of massive hemorrhage from peptic ulcer caused by antiplatelet drugs in elderly patients, and to analyze the prognostic factors.
METHODS
From May 2016 to May 2020, 255 patients with massive gastrointestinal ulcer hemorrhage caused by antiplatelet drugs at our hospital were prospectively selected. All patients received interventional embolization. The hemostatic effect, complications, and prognosis were recorded. Logistic regression equation was used to analyze the prognostic factors.
RESULTS
The effective rate of hemostasis was 94.90% in 255 elderly patients with gastrointestinal ulcer bleeding caused by antiplatelet drugs, and the complication rate was 2.75% (7/255). After 30 d of follow-up, it was found that antiplatelet drugs caused serious bleeding in elderly patients with gastrointestinal ulcer. The bleeding rate was 12.81%. According to the 30-day prognosis, the patients were divided into either a rebleeding group (n = 31) or a non-rebleeding group (n = 211); the two groups differed significantly in age, duration of antiplatelet drug use, ulcer history, gastrointestinal malignant tumor hist
ory, Helicobacter pylori positive status, hematemesis, shock, blood transfusion, Hb, ALB, ANC, BUN, PLT, ulcer location, and ulcer size (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that age, duration of antiplatelet drug use, ulcer history, Helicobacter pylori positive status, shock, blood transfusion, ANC, BUN, and Forrest grade Ia were the prognostic risk factors for elderly patients with peptic ulcer bleeding caused by antiplatelet drugs, while Hb, ALB, and PLT were identified to be prognostic protective factors (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
Interventional embolization can improve the hemostatic effect of antiplatelet drugs in elderly patients with gastrointestinal ulcer hemorrhage, but rebleeding tends to occur. Since rebleeding is closely related to blood transfusion, BUN, Hb, and other factors, it is recommended that clinical monitoring and intervention of the above indicators be carried out to reduce the incidence of rebleeding and improve the prognosis.
Collapse