Biosimilars in inflammatory bowel disease

Biosimilars versus biological therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: challenges and targeting strategies using drug delivery systems

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a multifactorial illness with a climbing prevalence worldwide. While biologics are commonly prescribed especially for severe cases, they may worsen patients' outcomes due to financial burden. Consequently, there has been an increased focus on biosimilars to improve overall disease outcomes by maintaining similar efficacy and safety while minimizing the cost of therapy. Infliximab-dyyb was the first biosimilar approved by US-FDA for IBD. Since that, the US-FDA approved 14 biosimilars with different mechanisms of action and different routes of administration for IBD patients (four infliximab biosimilars, nine adalimumab biosimilars, and most recently one ustekinumab biosimilar). It should be noted that more biologics are in the pipeline as golimumab and natalizumab patents are set to expire in the near future, and biosimilars are now in pre-clinical to phase 3 trials. Different studies have evaluated biologics' effectiveness and safety and concluded that the majority of available biosimilars are efficacious and have similar adverse effect profiles compared to their reference biologics. It is worth mentioningthat post-marketing surveillance reports revealed some risks associated with biosimilars which should be taken into consideration in future research and clinical trials to avoid health hazards. Most biologics and biosimilars are administered parenterally which results in several drawbacks such as raised risk of infections, hypersensitivity, autoimmunity, development of malignancies, liver toxicity as well as worsening of heart failure. Several drug delivery systems based on passive and active targeting mechanisms are under active investigation to overcome these limitations. This review sheds light on the emergence of biologics and biosimilars as alternatives in IBD management, the differences between them, challenges and risks, and future perspectives in IBD therapy and new trends in drug delivery systems.

Real-world experience with biosimilar infliximab-adba and infliximab-dyyb among infliximab-naïve patients with inflammatory bowel disease in the Veterans Health Administration

The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) listed the infliximab (IFX) biosimilar, IFX-dyyb (Inflectra), on the Veterans Affairs National Formulary (VANF) in May 2017. In September 2018, biosimilar IFX-abda (Renflexis) became the VANF IFX product. The recommended formulary changes from one IFX biosimilar to another provided a unique opportunity to study IFX utilization patterns in IFX-naïve Veterans with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). This study aimed to describe IFX and healthcare utilization during the 365 days after initiation with IFX reference product (RP) or biosimilars IFX-dyyb and IFX-adba. This descriptive study was performed using the VHA Corporate Data Warehouse. All Veterans initiated on IFX-RP (Remicade) or biosimilars IFX-dyyb and IFX-adba between September 1, 2016 and December 30, 2019 were included and followed for 365 days. Veterans enrolled in the VHA for at least 365 days with no evidence of IFX before their index date were considered IFX-naïve. Continuous data on IFX use, laboratory measurements, and healthcare utilization were reported with means, 95% confidence interval (CI), medians, and interquartile ranges. Frequency, proportions, and 95% CIs were presented for categorical variables. Statistical tests included ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis for continuous outcomes, Poisson regression for count-based outcomes (i.e., healthcare utilization visits), and Chi-square for dichotomous outcomes. The study identified 1763 IFX-naïve patients with IBD, and 785, 441, and 537 was indexed to RP, IFX-dyyb, and IFX-adba, respectively. Statistical differences were observed in IFX utilization measures related to dosing, adherence, and persistence. The proportion of days covered (PDC) during the 365-day follow-up period varied among the IFX groups: IFX-RP at 66%, IFX-dyyb at 60%, and IFX-abda at 69% (P value < .001). Persistence with the index IFX product during the 365-day follow-up period also varied: IFX-RP at 43%, IFX-dyyb at 32%, and IFX-abda at 51% (P value < .001). Healthcare utilization and laboratory findings were similar among the IFX groups. IFX utilization and laboratory patterns were clinically similar among the IFX biosimilars and RP groups, suggesting that providers did not modify their practice with biosimilars. Statistically significant differences in IFX utilization patterns are explained by formulary dynamics when the VANF product switched from IFX-dyyb to IFX-abda.

Positioning risankizumab in the treatment algorithm of moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease

Risankizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits the p19 subunit of IL-23 cytokine. Recently it has been approved for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (CD). We conducted a scoping review to summarize the available data on risankizumab and to define its positioning in the treatment algorithm of CD. Pubmed, Embase and Scopus databases were searched up to Oct 31, 2023 to identify studies reporting efficacy and safety data of risankizumab in patients with CD. Risankizumab is an effective and safe drug for the management of patients with moderate-to-severe CD. It could be used as first-line therapy in biologic-naive patients and in patients who have previously failed other biological therapies.

The PERFUSE study: The experience of patients receiving Adalimumab biosimilar SB5

BACKGROUND

SB5 is an EMA-approved adalimumab biosimilar, having demonstrated bioequivalence, equivalent efficacy, and similar safety and immunogenicity to the reference product.

AIMS

Describe patient training and satisfaction using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and assess their impact on 12-month persistence on SB5.

METHODS

The observational PERFUSE study included 318 Crohn's disease (CD) patients and 88 ulcerative colitis (UC) patients in 27 sites across France between October 2018 and December 2020. PROMs were collected at 1-month post-baseline using an online questionnaire (ePRO) designed with patient associations. Treatment persistence was collected during routine visits (up to 15 months post-initiation). Results are presented by prior experience with subcutaneous biologics and training in proper use of the injection device.

RESULTS

57.1% (n = 145) and 44.1% (n = 67) of naïve and pre-treated patients, respectively, answered the ePRO. Naïve patients were offered training more often (86.9% vs 31.3% respectively, p < 0.05), with disparities between sites. All subgroups' satisfaction scores were high. 12-month persistence on SB5 was significantly higher for respondents than for non-respondents (68.0% [60.9; 74.1] vs 52.3% [44.5; 59.6]; p < 0.05) and in patients with a better perception of their illness (OR=1.02, [1.0; 1.05]; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Early patient questionnaires may be useful to identify patients at higher risk of treatment discontinuation.

Longitudinal trends in direct costs and healthcare utilization ascribable to inflammatory bowel disease in the biologic era: a nationwide, population-based study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Biologic-era data regarding the direct cost and healthcare utilization of inflammatory bowel disease at the population level are limited, especially in Asia. Thus, we aimed to investigate the nationwide prevalence, direct cost, and healthcare utilization of inflammatory bowel disease in Korea in a recent 10-year period.

METHODS

Using the Korean National Health Insurance claim data from 2008 to 2017, we investigated all prescription medications and their associated direct costs, hospitalizations, and outpatient visits. We also estimated the nationwide prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease using population census data.

RESULTS

The estimated inflammatory bowel disease prevalence significantly increased from 108.8/100 000 in 2008 to 140.4/100 000 in 2017. The overall annual costs for inflammatory bowel disease and the healthcare cost per capita increased from $24.5 million (in US dollars) to $105.1 million and from $458.4 to $1456.6 million, respectively (both P < 0.001). Whereas the ratio of outpatient costs increased from 35.3% to 69.4%, that of outpatient days remained steady. The total annual medication cost and proportion rose from $13.3 million to $76.8 million and from 54.2% to 73.3%, respectively, mainly due to the increasing antitumor necrosis factor cost, from $1.5 million to $49.3 million (from 11.1% to 64.1% of the total annual drug cost and from 6.3% to 46.9% of the total annual cost).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed increasing trends in the prevalence, direct costs, and healthcare utilization of inflammatory bowel disease in Korea in recent years. The attributable cost was mainly driven by rising expenditures on antitumor necrosis factor medications.

MTA1 aggravates experimental colitis in mice by promoting transcription factor HIF1A and up-regulating AQP4 expression

Experimental colitis can persist as a chronic disease, accompanied with an underlying risk of development into colorectal cancer. Metastasis-associated protein 1 (MTA1), as a chromatin modifier, exerts notable association with multiple diseases, including colitis. The current study aims to investigate the mechanism of MTA1/HIF1A/AQP4 axis in experimental colitis in mice. First, experimental colitis mouse models were established using dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) and in vitro colonic epithelial cells FHC inflammation models were with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) for determination of MTA1 and HIF1A expressions. It was found that MTA1 and HIF1A were both highly-expressed in experimental colitis samples. Results of dual-luciferase reporter gene assay and ChIP assay further revealed that MTA1 activated HIF1A, and subsequently induced AQP4 transcription to up-regulate AQP4 in experimental colitis. Following loss- and gain-function, the effects of MTA1/HIF1A/AQP4 axis on apoptosis and viability of colon epithelial cells were detected by a combination of TUNEL staining and flow cytometry, and CCK-8 assay. It was observed that silencing of MAT1 in the FHC and NCM460 cells reduced IL-1β and TNF-α expressions induced by LPS. Meanwhile, AQP4 promoted LPS-induced inflammation, and exacerbated apoptosis of colon epithelial cells and augmented experimental colitis development in mice. In vivo experiments further verified that TGN-020 treatment effectively alleviated DSS-induced experimental colitis in mice and diminished apoptosis of colon epithelial cells. Altogether, MTA1 may promote AQP4 transcription by activating HIF1A, thus exacerbating DSS-induced experimental colitis in mice, which provides a novel direction for the treatment of experimental colitis.