Relationship between clinical evaluation and ultrasound assessment of rheumatoid arthritis patients using a 12 joint score

Application of Automated Hand Ultrasound Scanning and a Simplified Three-Joint Scoring System for Assessment of Rheumatoid Arthritis Activity

Ultrasound can be used to objectively diagnose and evaluate disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We aimed to determine the value of a new automated hand ultrasound (AHUS) scanning device and a simplified 3-joint ultrasound scoring system (US3) in detecting synovitis in RA. We compared AHUS and traditional ultrasound (US) scanning in detecting synovial hyperplasia (SH), joint effusion, bone erosion and power Doppler (PD) synovitis in 49 patients. In addition, we compared the value of US3 (in which 3 proximal interphalangeal [PIP] and/or metacarpophalangeal [MCP] joints with the highest scores for swelling and tenderness were evaluated) with the 22-joint ultrasound scoring system (US22) in 26 patients. Almost perfect κ coefficients (0.86-0.937) were obtained between AHUS and traditional US in detecting SH, joint effusion, bone erosion and PD synovitis (p < 0.001). The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) between AHUS and traditional US was 0.955-0.995. Of the US3 findings in AHUS, SH synovitis and PD synovitis were positively correlated with DAS28-CRP (adjusted R² = 0.421, p < 0.0001; adjusted R² = 0.365, p < 0.0001). US3 was highly correlated with US22 in detecting SH and PD synovitis (R = 0.792, p < 0.01; R = 0.948, p < 0.01). Compared with US22, a more significant correlation was identified between US3 scores and most clinical and laboratory values. In conclusion, AHUS performed comparably to traditional US in detecting synovitis in RA, and US3 was highly consistent with US22 in assessing synovitis and was positively correlated with RA disease activity.

The changing role of ultrasonography examination in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in light of recent studies

For many years, ultrasonography (US) has been a widely accepted modality used for joint assessment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Given the efficacy of present day therapies, there is scepticism whether it is required in the first place. The most recent clinical Targeting synovitis in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (TaSER) and Clinical Tight Control Therapy (ARCTIC) trials’ results appear to contradict it, yet this does not necessarily mean ultrasound has no place in modern rheumatology. The possibility of detecting inflammation at a subclinical level carries a tremendous predictive value, enabling identification of patients likely to experience an exacerbation in the coming months. Therefore, US should be a part of the decision-making process regarding treatment modification or introduction of any additional interventions, such as glucocorticosteroid injections.

The results of the most recent clinical trials do not negate the usefulness of US, but merely suggest that it ought to be used in moderation.

Comparison of three ultrasonographic examinations on the synovial membrane vascularity of RA patients

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune disease involving multiple joints and often involves the small joints, and the lesions are symmetric, invasive, and disabling. Synovial blood flow in patients with RA was compared using color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI), power Doppler ultrasound (PDUS), and superb microvascular imaging (SMI) to determine the application value of SMI in synovial vasospasm of knee joints. The blood flow signals of the suprapatellar recess in the knee joints of 41 RA patients (49 knees) were measured prior to undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA), recorded, and graded by CDFI, PDUS, and SMI. The results of the three ultrasound examination methods were compared and analyzed. The SMI grading was compared with the pathologic grade of the synovial membrane. Forty-one patients underwent 49 TKAs. The display rate of the synovial blood flow signal was 93.9% in the CDFI model, 97.9% in the PDUS model, and 100% in the SMI model. There were statistically significant differences in the results between the three ultrasound examination methods (H_C = 11.84, P < 0.05). The consistency of the SMI and pathologic grades of synovial membranes was better than the other methods (kappa = 0.639, P < 0.05). Compared with CDFI and PDUS, the signal of synovia flow detected by SMI was significantly higher in RA patients. SMI classification had a better consistency with the pathologic grade, and SMI has application value in assessing the activity of RA.