Will the COVID-19 pandemic trigger future occurrence of autoimmunity like Sjögren's syndrome?

[Autoimmunity and oral cavity, where are we in 2023?]

Autoimmune diseases (AIDs) remain an enigma to the current understanding of immune system functioning. Identifying their etiologies remains a major challenge, despite growing knowledge. The oral cavity has a very special place in regard to AIDs. The oral mucosa, the most exposed body's natural barrier to pathogens, plays a role in both education of the immune system and the organism's daily protection. On the one hand, systemic disturbance of the immune system can impact the oral sphere with early signs which are useful diagnostic tools. On the other hand, the current research efforts on interactions between microbiota and the immune system allow an update of the old hypothesis involving an initial infection to trigger autoimmunity. Dysbiosis of our microbiota, especially in the oral sphere, could lead to a breakdown in tolerance mechanisms. Immune tolerance has to maintain the integrity of the organism but also cohabitation with commensal microbiota. The relationship between periodontitis, a chronic infectious disease, and rheumatoid arthritis, one of the most common systemic autoimmune disorders, illustrates the possible relationship between chronic infections and the etiopathogenesis of autoimmunity. Indeed, its association with oral pathogens involved in periodontal damage raises questions about a possible infectious etiology of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) which would place the management of periodontitis not only as mandatory RA's support therapy but also as a prophylactic gesture to prevent autoimmunity.

The risk assessment of uveitis after COVID-19 diagnosis: A multicenter population-based study

Reports on uveitis after COVID-19 have been limited. Our objective was to examine the risk of uveitis among COVID-19 patients. This was a retrospective cohort study based on the TriNetX platform. The exposure group was patients with positive laboratory test result for SARS-CoV-2 and the comparison group was those tested negative for COVID-19 throughout the study period. The endpoint is the new diagnoses of uveitis. This study composed of 2 105 424 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 (55.4% female; 62.5% white; mean age at index 40.7 years) and 2 105 424 patients (55.4% female; 62.4% white; mean age at index 40.7 years) who never had COVID-19. There was significantly increased risk of new diagnosis of uveitis since the first month after diagnosis of COVID-19 compared with matched controls (HR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.03-1.34) up to 24 months (HR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.09-1.22). Our findings strengthen those previously raised by case series with a larger and multicenter study. We found that uveitis was significantly associated with COVID-19 infection. Our findings reiterate the need for careful investigation as well as increased awareness from ophthalmologists in considering the possibility of COVID-19 in vulnerable patients with new presentation of uveitis.

COVID-19 infection: a possible induction factor for development of autoimmune diseases?

Following the global spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, the importance of investigation of the pathogenesis and immunological characteristics of COVID-19 became quite clear. Currently, there are reports indicating that COVID-19 is able to induce autoimmune responses. Abnormal immune reactions are a cornerstone in the pathogenicity of both conditions. Detection of autoantibodies in COVID-19 patients may suggest a link between COVID-19 and autoimmunity. In this study, we focused on the similarities and possible differences between COVID-19 and autoimmune disorders to explore the relationship between them. Comparing the pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 infection with autoimmune conditions revealed significant immunological properties of COVID-19 including the presence of several autoantibodies, autoimmunity-related cytokines, and cellular activities that could be useful in future clinical studies aiming at managing this pandemic.

Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in primary Sjögren’s syndrome: humoral response, safety, and effects on disease activity

Introduction

There is no study specifically focused on SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS).

Objectives

To assess the immunogenicity, safety, possible effects on disease activity, and autoantibody profile of the Sinovac-CoronaVac vaccine in pSS.

Methods

Fifty-one pSS patients and 102 sex- and age-balanced controls without autoimmune diseases were included in a prospective phase 4 trial of the Sinovac-CoronaVac vaccine (two doses 28 days apart, D0/D28). Participants were assessed in three face-to-face visits (D0/D28 and six weeks after the 2nd dose (D69)) regarding adverse effects; clinical EULAR Sjögren’s Syndrome Disease Activity Index (clinESSDAI); anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG (seroconversion (SC) and geometric mean titers (GMT)); neutralizing antibodies (NAb); and pSS autoantibody profile.

Results

Patients and controls had comparable female sex frequency (98.0% vs. 98.0%, p = 1.000) and mean age (53.5 ± 11.7 vs. 53.4 ± 11.4 years, p = 0.924), respectively. On D69, pSS patients presented moderate SC (67.5% vs. 93.0%, p < 0.001) and GMT (22.5 (95% CI 14.6–34.5) vs. 59.6 (95% CI 51.1–69.4) AU/mL, p < 0.001) of anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG but lower than controls, and also, moderate NAb frequency (52.5% vs. 73.3%, p = 0.021) but lower than controls. Median neutralizing activity on D69 was comparable in pSS (58.6% (IQR 43.7–63.6)) and controls (64% (IQR 46.4–81.1)) (p = 0.219). Adverse events were mild. clinESSDAI and anti-Ro(SS-A)/anti-La(SS-B) levels were stable throughout the study (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Sinovac-CoronaVac vaccine is safe in pSS, without a deleterious impact on disease activity, and has a moderate short-term humoral response, though lower than controls. Thus, a booster dose needs to be studied in these patients.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04754698.

Key Points • Sinovac-CoronaVac vaccine is safe in pSS, without a detrimental effect on systemic disease activity, and has a moderate short-term humoral response • A booster doseshould be considered in these patients