Perioperative goal-directed therapy: A systematic review without meta-analysis

Haemodynamic monitoring and management during non-cardiac surgery: a survey among German anaesthesiologists

In 2023, the first German guideline on intraoperative haemodynamic monitoring and management for adults having non-cardiac surgery was published. The aim of this survey was to identify how anaesthetists in Germany managed intraoperative haemodynamics and blood pressure before its publication. In September to October 2023, members of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) were invited via email to participate in this anonymous online survey. Thirty-one questions covered demographics, clinical experience, approaches to perioperative blood pressure measurement and common thresholds, as well as the use of advanced haemodynamic monitoring and its potential therapeutic implications. 1,079 fully completed questionnaires were included in the analysis. When intermittent oscillometry was used to measure blood pressure, a 3-minute interval was usually applied during induction of anaesthesia (42%; 451/1,079). For invasive blood pressure monitoring, more than half (53%; 574/1,079) inserted an arterial line after induction of anaesthesia. Nearly all (94%; 1,012/1,079) focused on the mean arterial pressure for blood pressure monitoring, with a large majority (77%; 779/1012) considering values below 60-65 mmHg to be critically low. Intraoperative hypotension was managed based on an internal protocol by only 21% (223/1,079). Regarding advanced haemodynamic monitoring, 43% (459/1,079) frequently used pulse contour analysis, while 67% (721/1,079) reported that monitors with finger-cuff technology were not available in their department. 47% (504/1,079) cited a lack of experience as one of the main reasons for the infrequent use of cardiac output monitoring. This survey among DGAI members provides important insights into current practices of haemodynamic monitoring and management prior to the publication of the recent German guideline on 'Intraoperative haemodynamic monitoring and management of adults having non-cardiac surgery'.

Current Practices of Haemodynamic Monitoring in High-Risk Surgical Patients: A Nationwide Survey Among Malaysian Anaesthesiologists

BACKGROUND

Advanced haemodynamic monitoring has been recommended for use in high-risk surgeries and high-risk patients undergoing surgery. This study aims to assess the current practices of haemodynamic monitoring in high-risk surgical patients among Malaysian anaesthesiologists.

METHODOLOGY

This is a cross-sectional survey among Malaysian anaesthesiologists, following approval from the institution's Medical Research Ethics Committee and the National Medical Research Register. The survey utilised a questionnaire developed by Cannesson et al. to gather demographic data, practice information, and haemodynamic monitoring practices. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, and results were presented as the mean, median, or frequency as appropriate.

RESULTS

A total of 366 participants responded to the questionnaire, and 2 dropped out due to an incomplete form. This study found differences in the frequency of haemodynamic optimisation and monitoring techniques used in different healthcare settings. Written protocols or statements concerning haemodynamic management in high-risk surgical cases were only available to 15.7% of participants in the institution. The overall utilisation rate of cardiac output monitoring was found to be 31.1%, with a significant majority of the usage observed in university hospitals (p < 0.001). Central venous pressure was more commonly used in university hospitals and private hospitals compared to public hospitals (p < 0.001). The usage of advanced parameters such as stroke volume variation, cardiac index, and systemic vascular resistance was significantly higher in university hospitals, with a p value < 0.001. Transthoracic echocardiography was the most common tool used for high-risk surgical patients. The primary reasons for participants not utilising cardiac output monitoring include the lack of availability of such monitoring in their respective settings, which constitutes 66.9% of the respondents. The overwhelming majority of participants, namely 98%, expressed the belief that there is room for improvement in their present haemodynamic care.

CONCLUSIONS

This study offers significant insights into the prevailing haemodynamic monitoring practices employed by Malaysian anaesthesiologists in the context of high-risk surgical patients. The findings have the potential to contribute to future educational initiatives and establish practice standards for haemodynamic monitoring in high-risk surgical procedures.

Haemodynamic monitoring during noncardiac surgery: past, present, and future

During surgery, various haemodynamic variables are monitored and optimised to maintain organ perfusion pressure and oxygen delivery - and to eventually improve outcomes. Important haemodynamic variables that provide an understanding of most pathophysiologic haemodynamic conditions during surgery include heart rate, arterial pressure, central venous pressure, pulse pressure variation/stroke volume variation, stroke volume, and cardiac output. A basic physiologic and pathophysiologic understanding of these haemodynamic variables and the corresponding monitoring methods is essential. We therefore revisit the pathophysiologic rationale for intraoperative monitoring of haemodynamic variables, describe the history, current use, and future technological developments of monitoring methods, and finally briefly summarise the evidence that haemodynamic management can improve patient-centred outcomes.

Influence of different intraoperative fluid management on postoperative outcome after abdominal tumours resection

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative fluid management is a crucial aspect of cancer surgery, including colorectal surgery and pancreatoduodenectomy. The study tests if intraoperative multimodal monitoring reduces postoperative morbidity and duration of hospitalisation in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery treated by the same anaesthetic protocols with epidural analgesia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective study was conducted in 2 parallel groups. High-risk surgical patients undergoing major abdominal surgery were randomly selected in the control group (CG), where standard monitoring was applied (44 patients), and the protocol group (PG), where cerebral oxygenation and extended hemodynamic monitoring were used with the protocol for intraoperative interventions (44 patients).

RESULTS

There were no differences in the median length of hospital stay, CG 9 days (interquartile range [IQR] 8 days), PG 9 (5.5), p = 0.851. There was no difference in postoperative renal of cardiac impairment. Procalcitonin was significantly higher (highest postoperative value in the first 3 days) in CG, 0.75 mcg/L (IQR 3.19 mcg/L), than in PG, 0.3 mcg/L (0.88 mcg/L), p = 0.001. PG patients received a larger volume of intraoperative fluid; median intraoperative fluid balance +1300 ml (IQR 1063 ml) than CG; +375 ml (IQR 438 ml), p < 0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

There were significant differences in intraoperative fluid management and vasopressor use. The median postoperative value of procalcitonin was significantly higher in CG, suggesting differences in immune response to tissue trauma in different intraoperative fluid status, but there was no difference in postoperative morbidity or hospital stay.

A critical review of the perioperative fluid therapy and hemodynamic monitoring recommendations of the Enhanced Recovery of the Adult Pathway (RICA): A position statement of the fluid therapy and hemodynamic monitoring Subcommittee of the Hemostasis, Transfusion Medicine and Fluid Therapy Section (SHTF) of the Spanish Society of Anesthesiology and Critical Care (SEDAR)

In an effort to standardize perioperative management and improve postoperative outcomes of adult patients undergoing surgery, the Ministry of Health, through the Spanish Multimodal Rehabilitation Group (GERM), and the Aragonese Institute of Health Sciences, in collaboration with multiple Spanish scientific societies and based on the available evidence, published in 2021 the Spanish Intensified Adult Recovery (RICA) guideline. This document includes 12 perioperative measures related to fluid therapy and hemodynamic monitoring. Fluid administration and hemodynamic monitoring are not straightforward but are directly related to postoperative patient outcomes. The Fluid Therapy and Hemodynamic Monitoring Subcommittee of the Hemostasis, Transfusion Medicine and Fluid Therapy Section (SHTF) of the Spanish Society of Anesthesiology and Critical Care (SEDAR) has reviewed these recommendations and concluded that they should be revised as they do not follow an adequate methodology.

Fluid management and vasopressor use during colorectal surgery: the search for the optimal balance

BACKGROUND

Although it is known that excessive intraoperative fluid and vasopressor agents are detrimental for anastomotic healing, optimal anesthesiology protocols for colorectal surgery are currently lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To scrutinize the current hemodynamic practice and vasopressor use and their relation to colorectal anastomotic leakage.

DESIGN

A secondary analysis of a previously published prospective observational study: the LekCheck study.

STUDY SETTING

Adult patients undergoing a colorectal resection with the creation of a primary anastomosis.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Colorectal anastomotic leakage (CAL) within 30 days postoperatively, hospital length of stay and 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 1548 patients, 579 (37%) received vasopressor agents during surgery. Of these, 201 were treated with solely noradrenaline, 349 were treated with phenylephrine, and 29 received ephedrine. CAL rate significantly differed between the patients receiving vasopressor agents during surgery compared to patients without (11.8% vs 6.3%, p < 0.001). CAL was significantly higher in the group receiving phenylephrine compared to noradrenaline (14.3% vs 6%, p < 0.001). Vasopressor agents were used more often in patients treated with Goal Directed Therapy (47% vs 34.6%, p < 0.001). There was a higher mortality rate in patients with vasopressors compared to the group without (2.8% vs 0.4%, p = 0.01, OR 3.8). Mortality was higher in the noradrenaline group compared to the phenylephrine and those without vasopressors (5% vs. 0.4% and 1.7%, respectively, p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, patients with intraoperative vasopressor agents had an increased risk to develop CAL (OR 2.1, CI 1.3-3.2, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The present study contributes to the evidence that intraoperative use of vasopressor agents is associated with a higher rate of CAL. This study helps to create awareness on the (necessity to) use of vasopressor agents in colorectal surgery patients in striving for successful anastomotic wound healing. Future research will be required to balance vasopressor agent dosage in view of colorectal anastomotic leakage.

Perioperative fluid management for lung transplantation is challenging

Lung transplantation is the definitive end-stage treatment for many lung diseases, and postoperative pulmonary oedema severely affects survival after lung transplantation. Optimizing perioperative fluid management can reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary oedema and improve the prognosis of lung transplant patients by removing the influence of patient, donor's lung and ECMO factors. Therefore, this article reviews seven aspects of lung transplant patients' pathophysiological characteristics, physiological characteristics of fluids, the influence of the donor lung on pulmonary oedema as well as current fluid rehydration concepts, advantages or disadvantages of intraoperative monitoring tools or types of fluids on postoperative pulmonary oedema, while showing the existing challenges in section 7. The aim is to show the specificity of perioperative fluid management in lung transplant patients and to provide new ideas for individualised fluid management in lung transplantation.

Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy: an imprecise umbrella term to avoid

'Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy' describes various haemodynamic treatment strategies that have in common that interventions are titrated to achieve predefined haemodynamic targets. However, the treatment strategies differ substantially regarding the underlying haemodynamic target variables and target values, and thus presumably have different effects on outcome. It is an over-simplifying approach to lump complex and substantially differing haemodynamic treatment strategies together under the term 'goal-directed haemodynamic therapy', an imprecise umbrella term that we should thus stop using.

Haemodynamic monitoring and management in patients having noncardiac surgery: A survey among members of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care

BACKGROUND

Haemodynamic monitoring and management is a mainstay of peri-operative anaesthetic care.

OBJECTIVE

To determine how anaesthesiologists measure and manage blood pressure and cardiac output, and how they guide fluid administration and assess fluid responsiveness in patients having noncardiac surgery.

DESIGN

Web-based survey.

SETTING

Survey among members of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) in October and November 2021.

PARTICIPANTS

ESAIC members responding to the survey.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Respondents' answers to 30 questions on haemodynamic monitoring and management, and fluid therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 615 fully completed surveys were analysed. Arterial catheters are usually not placed before induction of general anaesthesia (378/615; 61%) even when invasive blood pressure monitoring is planned. Mean arterial pressure (532/615; 87%) with lower intervention thresholds of 65 mmHg (183/531; 34%) or 20% below pre-operative baseline (166/531; 31%) is primarily used to guide blood pressure management. Cardiac output is most frequently measured using pulse wave analysis (548/597; 92%). However, only one-third of respondents (almost) always use cardiac output to guide haemodynamic management in high-risk patients (225/582; 39%). Dynamic cardiac preload variables are more frequently used to guide haemodynamic management than cardiac output [pulse pressure variation (almost) always: 318/589; 54%]. Standardised treatment protocols are rarely used for haemodynamic management (139/614; 23%). For fluid therapy, crystalloids are primarily used as maintenance fluids, to treat hypovolaemia, and for fluid challenges. The use of 0.9% saline and hydroxyethyl starch has declined over the last decade. The preferred methods to assess fluid responsiveness are dynamic preload variables and fluid challenges, most commonly with 250 ml of fluid (319/613; 52%).

CONCLUSION

This survey provides important information how anaesthesiologists currently measure and manage blood pressure and cardiac output, and how they guide fluid administration in patients having noncardiac surgery.

Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy Enhances Gastrointestinal Recovery after Laparoscopic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

(1) Background: Whether goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) provides any outcome benefit as compared to non-goal-directed fluid therapy (N-GDFT) in elective abdominal laparoscopic surgery has not been determined yet. (2) Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Scopus. The main outcomes were length of hospital stay (LOHS), time to first flatus and stool, intraoperative fluid and vasopressor requirements, serum lactate levels, and urinary output. Pooled risks ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for dichotomous outcomes and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% CI for continuous outcomes. (3) Results: Eleven studies were included in the quantitative, and fifteen in the qualitative synthesis. LOHS (WMD: -1.18 days, 95% CI: -1.84 to -0.53) and time to first stool (WMD: -9.8 h; CI -12.7 to -7.0) were significantly shorter in the GDFT group. GDFT resulted in significantly less intraoperative fluid administration (WMD: -441 mL, 95% CI: -790 to -92) and lower lactate levels at the end of the operation: WMD: -0.25 mmol L-1; 95% CI: -0.36 to -0.14. (4) Conclusions: GDFT resulted in enhanced recovery of the gastrointestinal function and shorter LOHS as compared to N-GDFT.

Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy during general anaesthesia for noncardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

During general anaesthesia for noncardiac surgery, there remain knowledge gaps regarding the effect of goal-directed haemodynamic therapy on patient-centred outcomes.

METHODS

Included clinical trials investigated goal-directed haemodynamic therapy during general anaesthesia in adults undergoing noncardiac surgery and reported at least one patient-centred postoperative outcome. PubMed and Embase were searched for relevant articles on March 8, 2021. Two investigators performed abstract screening, full-text review, data extraction, and bias assessment. The primary outcomes were mortality and hospital length of stay, whereas 15 postoperative complications were included based on availability. From a main pool of comparable trials, meta-analyses were performed on trials with homogenous outcome definitions. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE).

RESULTS

The main pool consisted of 76 trials with intermediate risk of bias for most outcomes. Overall, goal-directed haemodynamic therapy might reduce mortality (odds ratio=0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 1.09) and shorten length of stay (mean difference=-0.72 days; 95% CI, -1.10 to -0.35) but with low certainty in the evidence. For both outcomes, larger effects favouring goal-directed haemodynamic therapy were seen in abdominal surgery, very high-risk surgery, and using targets based on preload variation by the respiratory cycle. However, formal tests for subgroup differences were not statistically significant. Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy decreased risk of several postoperative outcomes, but only infectious outcomes and anastomotic leakage reached moderate certainty of evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy during general anaesthesia might decrease mortality, hospital length of stay, and several postoperative complications. Only infectious postoperative complications and anastomotic leakage reached moderate certainty in the evidence.

Should fluid management in thoracic surgery be goal directed?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To find a reliable answer to the question in the title: Should fluid management in thoracic surgery be goal directed?

RECENT FINDINGS

'Moderate' fluid regimen is the current recommendation of fluid management in thoracic anesthesia, however, especially in more risky patients; 'Goal-Directed Therapy' (GDT) can be a more reliable approach than just 'moderate'. There are numerous studies examining its effects in general anesthesia; albeit mostly retrospective and very heterogenic. There are few studies of GDT in thoracic anesthesia with similar drawbacks.

SUMMARY

Although the evidence level is low, GDT is generally associated with fewer postoperative complications. It can be helpful in decision-making for volume-optimization, timing of fluid administration, and indication of vasoactive agents.

The use of a vascular occlusion test combined with near-infrared spectroscopy in perioperative care: a systematic review

In the perioperative phase oxygen delivery and consumption can be influenced by different factors, i.e. type of surgery, anesthetic and cardiovascular drugs, or fluids. By combining near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) monitoring of regional tissue oxygen saturation (StO₂) with an ischemic provocation test, the vascular occlusion test (VOT), local tissue oxygen consumption and vascular reactivity at the microcirculatory level can be assessed. This systematic review aims to give an overview of the clinical information that VOT-derived NIRS values can provide in the perioperative period. After performing a systematic literature search, we included 29 articles. It was not possible to perform a meta-analysis because of the lack of comparable data and the observational nature of the majority of the included articles. We have clustered the found articles in two groups: non-cardiac surgery and cardiac surgery. We found that VOT-derived NIRS values show a wide variability and are influenced by the effects of anesthetics, cardiovascular drugs, fluids, and by the type of surgery. Additionally, deviations in VOT-derived NIRS values are also associated with adverse patients' outcomes, such as postoperative complications, prolonged mechanical ventilation and prolonged hospital length of stay. However, given the variability in VOT-derived NIRS values, clinical applicability remains elusive. Future clinical interventional trials might provide additional insight into the potential of VOT associated with NIRS to optimize perioperative care by targeting specific interventions to optimize the function of the microvasculature.

Restricted, optimized or liberal fluid strategy in thoracic surgery: A narrative review

Perioperative fluid balance has a major impact on clinical and functional outcome, regardless of the type of interventions. In thoracic surgery, patients are more vulnerable to intravenous fluid overload and to develop acute respiratory distress syndrome and other complications. New insight has been gained on the mechanisms causing pulmonary complications and the role of the endothelial glycocalix layer to control fluid transfer from the intravascular to the interstitial spaces and to promote tissue blood flow. With the implementation of standardized processes of care, the preoperative fasting period has become shorter, surgical approaches are less invasive and patients are allowed to resume oral intake shortly after surgery. Intraoperatively, body fluid homeostasis and adequate tissue oxygen delivery can be achieved using a normovolemic therapy targeting a “near-zero fluid balance” or a goal-directed hemodynamic therapy to maximize stroke volume and oxygen delivery according to the Franck–Starling relationship. In both fluid strategies, the use of cardiovascular drugs is advocated to counteract the anesthetic-induced vasorelaxation and maintain arterial pressure whereas fluid intake is limited to avoid cumulative fluid balance exceeding 1 liter and body weight gain (~1-1.5 kg). Modern hemodynamic monitors provide valuable physiological parameters to assess patient volume responsiveness and circulatory flow while guiding fluid administration and cardiovascular drug therapy. Given the lack of randomized clinical trials, controversial debate still surrounds the issues of the optimal fluid strategy and the type of fluids (crystalloids versus colloids). To avoid the risk of lung hydrostatic or inflammatory edema and to enhance the postoperative recovery process, fluid administration should be prescribed as any drug, adapted to the patient's requirement and the context of thoracic intervention.

Perioperative goal-directed therapy in high-risk abdominal surgery. A multicenter randomized controlled superiority trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The potential of perioperative goal-directed therapy (PGDT) to improve outcome after high-risk abdominal surgery remains subject of debate. In particular, there is a need for large, multicenter trials focusing on relevant patient outcomes to confirm the evidence found in small, single center studies including minor complications in their composite endpoints. The present study therefore aims to investigate the effect of an arterial waveform analysis based PGDT algorithm on the incidence of major complications including mortality after high-risk abdominal surgery.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial.

SETTING

Operating theatres and Post-Anesthesia/Intensive Care units (PACU/ICU) of four tertiary hospitals in The Netherlands.

PATIENTS

A total number of 482 patients undergoing elective, abdominal surgery that is considered high-risk due to the extent of the procedure and/or patient comorbidities.

INTERVENTIONS

Hemodynamic therapy using an age-specific PGDT algorithm including cardiac index (CI) and stroke volume variation (SVV) measurements during a 24-h perioperative period starting at induction of anesthesia.

MEASUREMENTS

The average number of major complications (including mortality) within 30 days after surgery, the number of minor complications, hospital and PACU/ICU length of stay (LOS), amounts of fluids and vasoactive medications used. Complications were graded using the Accordion severity grading system.

RESULTS

The average number of major complications per patient was 0.79 (PGDT group) versus 0.69 (control group) (p = 0.195). There were no statistically significant differences in the number of minor complications, hospital LOS, PACU/ICU LOS, or grading of complications. Patients in the PGDT group received more fluids intraoperatively, more dobutamine intra- and postoperatively, while patients in the control group received more phenylephrine during the operation.

CONCLUSIONS

PGDT based on a CI and SVV driven algorithm did not result in improved outcomes after high-risk abdominal surgery.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Netherlands Trial Registry: NTR3380.

Lifting the lid on perioperative goal-directed therapy

The complex cellular interactions that underlie pathologies related to reduced oxygen delivery after surgery are poorly defined and difficult to measure. Heywood and colleagues explored the patterns of protein expression in skin biopsies taken from a subgroup of patients enrolled in a randomised trial designed to evaluate perioperative goal-directed therapy. One of their key findings was that a failure of participants to maintain preoperative systemic oxygen delivery was associated with an upregulation of intracellular proteins involved in counteracting oxidative stress. Their study highlights the importance of oxidative stress in the perioperative setting and suggests that maintenance of baseline oxygen delivery might be an important regulator of redox balance.

Peri-operative oxygen consumption revisited: An observational study in elderly patients undergoing major abdominal surgery

BACKGROUND

Monitoring oxygen consumption (VO2) is neither recommended nor included in peri-operative haemodynamic algorithms aiming at optimising oxygen delivery (DO2) in major abdominal surgery. Estimates of peri-operative VO2 changes are uncertain in earlier publications and have limited generalisability in the current high-risk surgical population. In a prospective non-interventional observational study in elderly patients undergoing major abdominal procedures, we investigated the change of VO2 after induction of anaesthesia and secondarily, the further changes during and after surgery in relation to DO2 and estimated oxygen extraction ratio (O2ER) by routine monitoring.

METHODS

VO2 was determined by indirect calorimetry (QuarkRMR) in 20 patients more than 65 years (ASA II to IV), scheduled for elective open upper abdominal surgery with combined epidural and general anaesthesia. Data were collected during 20-minute periods pre-operatively and after anaesthesia induction, with subsequent measurements during surgery and postoperatively. Simultaneously, DO2 was monitored using LiDCOplus. The O2ER was estimated from arterial-central venous oxygen content calculation. Mixed models were used to analyse the peri-operative changes.

RESULTS

VO2 decreased after induction of anaesthesia by a mean of 34% (95% CI, 28 to 39). After 2 h of surgery, VO2 was reduced by 24% (95% CI, 20 to 27) compared with the awake baseline measurements. Pre-operative mean DO2 was 440 (95% CI, 396 to 483) ml min m and decreased by a mean of 37% (95% CI, 30 to 43) during anaesthesia. The estimated O2ER did not change intra-operatively 0.24 (95% CI, 0.21 to 0.26) but increased postoperatively to 0.31 (95% CI, 0.27 to 0.36). The changes of VO2 were parallel with changes of DO2 and O2ER in the intra-operative period.

CONCLUSION

General anaesthesia reduced VO2 by approximately a third in elderly patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Parallel changes of intra-operative VO2 and delivery were demonstrated while oxygen extraction was low. The relevance of these changes needs further assessment in relation to outcomes and haemodynamic interventions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03355118.

Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Patients Undergoing Major Head and Neck Surgery: A Prospective Observational Pilot Study

Background: Head and neck patients are prone to malnutrition. Perioperative fluids administration in this patient group may influence nutritional status. We aimed to investigate perioperative changes in patients undergoing major head and neck surgery and to examine the impact of perioperative fluid administration on body composition and metabolic changes using bioelectrical impedance. Furthermore, we sought to correlate these metabolic changes with postoperative complication rate. In this prospective observational pilot study, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) was performed preoperatively and on postoperative days (POD) 2 and 10 on patients who underwent major head and neck surgeries. BIA was completed in 34/37 patients; mean total intraoperative and post-anesthesia fluid administration was 3682 ± 1910 mL and 1802 ± 1466 mL, respectively. Total perioperative fluid administration was associated with postoperative high extra-cellular water percentages (p = 0.038) and a low phase-angle score (p < 0.005), which indicates low nutritional status. Patients with phase angle below the 5th percentile at POD 2 had higher local complication rates (p = 0.035) and longer hospital length of stay (LOS) (p = 0.029). Multivariate analysis failed to demonstrate that high-volume fluid administration and phase angle are independent factors for postoperative complications. High-volume perioperative fluids administration impacts postoperative nutritional status with fluid shift toward the extra-cellular space and is associated with factors that increase the risk of postoperative complications and longer LOS. An adjusted, low-volume perioperative fluid regimen should be considered in patients with comorbidities in order to minimize postoperative morbidity.

Goal-directed hemodynamic therapy versus restrictive normovolemic therapy in major open abdominal surgery: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the occurrence of postoperative complications in patients undergoing elective open abdominal surgery and receiving intraoperative goal-directed hemodynamic therapy or restrictive normovolemic therapy.

METHODS

A total of 401 patients were randomized in the goal-directed hemodynamic therapy or restrictive normovolemic therapy groups. A cardiac output monitor was used in all goal-directed hemodynamic therapy patients and was left at the discretion of anesthetists in charge of patients in the restrictive normovolemic therapy group. The primary outcome was a composite morbidity endpoint (30-day mortality and complications grade 2-4 according to Dindo-Clavien classification). Secondary outcomes were the hospital duration of stay, the incidence of pulmonary, cardiovascular, and renal complications up to 30 days after surgery, and midterm survival.

RESULTS

Intraoperatively, the goal-directed hemodynamic therapy group received higher intravenous fluid volumes (mean of 10.8 mL/kg/h and standard deviation of 4.0) compared with the restrictive normovolemic therapy group (mean of 7.2 mL/kg/h and standard deviation of 2.0; P < .001). On the first postoperative day, similar fluid volumes were infused in the 2 groups. The primary outcome occurred in 57.7% of goal-directed hemodynamic therapy and 53.0% of restrictive normovolemic therapy (relative risk, 1.09 [95% confidence interval, 0.91-1.30]), and there was no significant difference between groups for any secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Among patients undergoing major open abdominal surgery, the goal-directed hemodynamic therapy and the restrictive normovolemic therapy were associated with similar incidence of moderate-to-severe postoperative complications and hospital resource use.

The effect of compliance with a perioperative goal-directed therapy protocol on outcomes after high-risk surgery: a before-after study

Perioperative goal-directed therapy is considered to improve patient outcomes after high-risk surgery. The association of compliance with perioperative goal-directed therapy protocols and postoperative outcomes is unclear. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of protocol compliance on postoperative outcomes following high-risk surgery, after implementation of a perioperative goal-directed therapy protocol. Through a before-after study design, patients undergoing elective high-risk surgery before (before-group) and after implementation of a perioperative goal-directed therapy protocol (after-group) were included. Perioperative goal-directed therapy in the after-group consisted of optimized stroke volume variation or stroke volume index and optimized cardiac index. Additionally, the association of protocol compliance with postoperative complications when using perioperative goal-directed therapy was assessed. High protocol compliance was defined as ≥ 85% of the procedure time spent within the individual targets. The difference in complications during the first 30 postoperative days before and after implementation of the protocol was assessed. In the before-group, 214 patients were included and 193 patients in the after-group. The number of complications was higher in the before-group compared to the after-group (n = 414 vs. 282; p = 0.031). In the after-group, patients with high protocol compliance for stroke volume variation or stroke volume index had less complications compared to patients with low protocol compliance for stroke volume variation or stroke volume index (n = 187 vs. 90; p = 0.01). Protocol compliance by the attending clinicians is essential and should be monitored to facilitate an improvement in postoperative outcomes desired by the implementation of perioperative goal-directed therapy protocols.

Goal-Directed Therapy for Cardiac Surgery

Goal-directed therapy couples therapeutic interventions with physiologic and metabolic targets to mitigate a patient's modifiable risks for death and complications. Goal-directed therapy attempts to improve quality-of-care metrics, including length of stay, rate of readmission, and cost per case. Debate persists around specific parameters and goals, the risk profiles that may benefit, and associated therapeutic strategies. Goal-directed therapy has demonstrated reduced complication rates and lengths of stay in noncardiac surgery studies. Establishing goal-directed therapy's early promise and role in cardiac surgery-namely, producing fewer complications and deaths-will require larger studies, including those with greater focus on high-risk patients.

Personalised haemodynamic management targeting baseline cardiac index in high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: a randomised single-centre clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Despite several clinical trials on haemodynamic therapy, the optimal intraoperative haemodynamic management for high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery remains unclear. We tested the hypothesis that personalised haemodynamic management targeting each individual's baseline cardiac index at rest reduces postoperative morbidity.

METHODS

In this single-centre trial, 188 high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery were randomised to either routine management or personalised haemodynamic management requiring clinicians to maintain personal baseline cardiac index (determined at rest preoperatively) using an algorithm that guided intraoperative i.v. fluid and/or dobutamine administration. The primary outcome was a composite of major complications (European Perioperative Clinical Outcome definitions) or death within 30 days of surgery. Secondary outcomes included postoperative morbidity (assessed by a postoperative morbidity survey), hospital length of stay, mortality within 90 days of surgery, and neurocognitive function assessed after postoperative Day 3.

RESULTS

The primary outcome occurred in 29.8% (28/94) of patients in the personalised management group, compared with 55.3% (52/94) of patients in the routine management group (relative risk: 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38 to 0.77; absolute risk reduction: -25.5%, 95% CI: -39.2% to -11.9%; P<0.001). One patient assigned to the personalised management group, compared with five assigned to the routine management group, died within 30 days after surgery (P=0.097). There were no clinically relevant differences between the two groups for secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery, personalised haemodynamic management reduces a composite outcome of major postoperative complications or death within 30 days after surgery compared with routine care.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02834377.

Enhanced recovery programs in gastrointestinal surgery: Actions to promote optimal perioperative nutritional and metabolic care

The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway is an evidence-based approach to the use of care elements along the patient perioperative pathway. All care elements that may impact on clinically relevant outcomes have been considered and reviewed. The combined ERAS actions allow a quicker return to bowel function, oral feeding, nutritional and metabolic equilibrium, normal activity and ultimately to achieve better outcomes. Because of the multi factorial approach and the commitment of all the professionals caring for the patient, it is necessary to have the engagement of all disciplines, such as surgery, anesthesiology, clinical nutrition, nursing, physiatry, involved. ERAS is a dynamic process and new evidence are constantly integrated into the program. The primary endpoint of this review is to give updated information on the key ERAS actions to achieve optimal perioperative nutritional and metabolic care.

How to deal with severe acute pancreatitis in the critically ill

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review recent literature on the management of patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) admitted to an ICU.

RECENT FINDINGS

SAP is a devastating disease associated with a high morbidity and mortality. Recent evidence advocates adequate risk assessment and severity prediction (including intra-abdominal pressure monitoring), tailored fluid administration favoring balanced crystalloids, withholding prophylactic antibiotic therapy, and early detection and treatment of extra-pancreatic and fungal infections. Urgent (within 24-48 h after diagnosis) endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is indicated when persistent biliary obstruction or cholangitis are present. Corticosteroid therapy (mainly dexamethasone) can reduce the need for surgical interventions, length of hospital stay, and mortality. Peritoneal lavage may significantly lower morbidity and mortality. Hemofiltration may offer substantial benefit but more studies are needed to prove its efficacy. Enteral feeding using a polymeric formula and provided early through a nasogastric tube is recommended but has no survival benefit compared with parenteral nutrition. Probiotics could be beneficial, however no clear recommendations can be made.

SUMMARY

Management of SAP is multimodal with emphasis on monitoring, adequate fluid resuscitation, avoiding prophylactic use of antibiotics, cause-directed procedures or treatment, and organ support. There is a role for early enteral nutrition including probiotics.

What the anaesthesiologist needs to know about heart-lung interactions

The impact of positive pressure ventilation extends the effect on lungs and gas exchange because the altered intra-thoracic pressure conditions influence determinants of cardiovascular function. These mechanisms are called heart-lung interactions, which conceptually can be divided into two components (1) The effect of positive airway pressure on the cardiovascular system, which may be more or less pronounced under various pathologic cardiac conditions, and (2) The effect of cyclic airway pressure swing on the cardiovascular system, which can be useful in the interpretation of the individual patient's current haemodynamic state. It is imperative for the anaesthesiologist to understand the fundamental mechanisms of heart-lung interactions, as they are a foundation for the understanding of optimal, personalised cardiovascular treatment of patients undergoing surgery in general anaesthesia. The aim of this review is thus to describe what the anaesthesiologist needs to know about heart-lung interactions.

Intraoperative Goal-Directed Anesthetic Management of the Patient with Severe Pulmonary Hypertension

Patient: Female, 76

Final Diagnosis: Right upper lung tumor with severe pulmonary hypertension

Symptoms: Shortness of breath

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: Ecective bronxhoscopy • robotic right upper lobectomy • thoracic lymphadenectomy

Specialty: Anesthesiology

Perioperative goal-directed therapy - What is the evidence?

Perioperative goal-directed therapy aims at optimizing global hemodynamics during the perioperative period by titrating fluids, vasopressors, and/or inotropes to predefined hemodynamic goals. There is evidence on the benefit of perioperative goal-directed therapy, but its adoption into clinical practice is slow and incomprehensive. Current evidence indicates that treating patients according to perioperative goal-directed therapy protocols reduces morbidity and mortality, particularly in patients having high-risk surgery. Perioperative goal-directed therapy protocols need to be started early, should include vasoactive agents in addition to fluids, and should target blood flow related variables. Future promising developments in the field of perioperative goal-directed therapy include personalized hemodynamic management and closed-loop system management.

Journal of clinical monitoring and computing end of year summary 2018: hemodynamic monitoring and management

Hemodynamic management is a mainstay of patient care in the operating room and intensive care unit (ICU). In order to optimize patient treatment, researchers investigate monitoring technologies, cardiovascular (patho-) physiology, and hemodynamic treatment strategies. The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing (JCMC) is a well-established and recognized platform for publishing research in this field. In this review, we highlight recent advancements and summarize selected papers published in the JCMC in 2018 related to hemodynamic monitoring and management.

Is goal-directed fluid therapy based on dynamic variables alone sufficient to improve clinical outcomes among patients undergoing surgery? A meta-analysis

Background

Whether goal-directed fluid therapy based on dynamic predictors of fluid responsiveness (GDFTdyn) alone improves clinical outcomes in comparison with standard fluid therapy among patients undergoing surgery remains unclear.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for relevant studies. Studies comparing the effects of GDFTdyn with that of standard fluid therapy on clinical outcomes among adult patients undergoing surgery were considered eligible. Two analyses were performed separately: GDFTdyn alone versus standard fluid therapy and GDFTdyn with other optimization goals versus standard fluid therapy. The primary outcomes were short-term mortality and overall morbidity, while the secondary outcomes were serum lactate concentration, organ-specific morbidity, and length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and in hospital.

Results

We included 37 studies with 2910 patients. Although GDFTdyn alone lowered serum lactate concentration (mean difference (MD) − 0.21 mmol/L, 95% confidence interval (CI) (− 0.39, − 0.03), P = 0.02), no significant difference was found between groups in short-term mortality (odds ratio (OR) 0.85, 95% CI (0.32, 2.24), P = 0.74), overall morbidity (OR 1.03, 95% CI (0.31, 3.37), P = 0.97), organ-specific morbidity, or length of stay in the ICU and in hospital. Analysis of trials involving the combination of GDFTdyn and other optimization goals (mainly cardiac output (CO) or cardiac index (CIx)) showed a significant reduction in short-term mortality (OR 0.45, 95% CI (0.24, 0.85), P = 0.01), overall morbidity (OR 0.41, 95% CI (0.28, 0.58), P < 0.00001), serum lactate concentration (MD − 0.60 mmol/L, 95% CI (− 1.04, − 0.15), P = 0.009), cardiopulmonary complications (cardiac arrhythmia (OR 0.58, 95% CI (0.37, 0.92), P = 0.02), myocardial infarction (OR 0.35, 95% CI (0.16, 0.76), P = 0.008), heart failure/cardiovascular dysfunction (OR 0.31, 95% CI (0.14, 0.67), P = 0.003), acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome (OR 0.13, 95% CI (0.02, 0.74), P = 0.02), pneumonia (OR 0.4, 95% CI (0.24, 0.65), P = 0.0002)), length of stay in the ICU (MD − 0.77 days, 95% CI (− 1.07, − 0.46), P < 0.00001) and in hospital (MD − 1.18 days, 95% CI (− 1.90, − 0.46), P = 0.001).

Conclusions

It was not the optimization of fluid responsiveness by GDFTdyn alone but rather the optimization of tissue and organ perfusion by GDFTdyn and other optimization goals that benefited patients undergoing surgery. Patients managed with the combination of GDFTdyn and CO/CI goals might derive most benefit.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-018-2251-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.