Feasibility of remote self-collection of dried blood spots, hair, and nails among people with HIV with hazardous alcohol use

Chronic Stress and Severe Water Insecurity During the Historic 2022 Drought in Northern Kenya Were Associated With Inflammation Among Daasanach Seminomadic Pastoralists

OBJECTIVE

Extreme climatic events, like droughts, are increasing in frequency and severity. Droughts disrupt community livelihoods and resources with serious implications for human biology. This study investigated how chronic stress, measured by fingernail cortisol concentration (FCC), and water insecurity status were predictive of C-reactive protein (CRP), a biomarker of inflammation, during a historic drought among Daasanach seminomadic pastoralists.

METHODS

Data were collected at the height of the 2022 drought from 128 Daasanach household heads aged 16-80 years in northern Kenya using household surveys, anthropometric measurements, and dried blood spots to assess CRP levels and fingernails to assess FCC. We employed mixed-effects linear and logistic regression models to examine the relationships between log-transformed FCC, high water insecurity status measured via the Household Water Insecurity Experiences (HWISE ≥ 24) scale, and serum-equivalent CRP (log-transformed and dichotomized at mild, low-grade inflammation ≥ 1 mg/L) adjusted for covariates.

RESULTS

The mean serum-equivalent CRP was 4.1 mg/L and 56.3% of Daasanach adults had at least mild, low-grade inflammation. Linear models indicated that ln(FCC) was positively associated with ln(CRP) (β = 0.56, SE = 0.12; p < 0.001). Further, logistic models demonstrated that ln(FCC) (OR = 2.69, 95% CI: 1.84-3.95; p < 0.001) and high water insecurity (OR = 2.23, 95% CI: 1.34-3.72; p = 0.002) were both associated with greater odds of low-grade inflammation.

CONCLUSION

This study provides evidence for how chronic stress and severe water insecurity may impact inflammation levels among pastoralists during drought. Since inflammation is central to cardiometabolic disease etiology, this is an additional reason to mitigate the negative health impacts of droughts and water insecurity exacerbated by climate change.

Differences in Self-Reported Stress Versus Hair and Nail Cortisol Among Adolescent and Young Adult Males

BACKGROUND

Chronic stress causes harmful physiological responses that yield increased inflammation and subsequent health conditions. Stress is an important measure among minoritized populations who face social situations that predispose risk to developing mental health problems. Hair and fingernail cortisol have been studied as retrospective measures of chronic stress and to demonstrate biological response to social situations.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to compare the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) with hair and nail cortisol concentrations and assess the risk factors associated with stress levels among heterosexual and sexual and gender-minoritized adolescent males.

METHODS

We recruited a cohort of adolescents who were assigned male sex at birth. Approximately half of our cohort consisted of sexual and gender-minoritized people, and half consisted of heterosexual cisgender males. Participants provided hair and nail samples and completed a survey that included demographic and hair hygiene questions and the PSS. Hair and nail samples were processed in a laboratory, and survey results were analyzed descriptively.

RESULTS

Several samples were not provided or received, and some survey data were missing. Hair and nail cortisol values were significantly associated. There was no significant relationship between the PSS and hair and nail cortisol values. No significant differences were found between the heterosexual and sexual minoritized groups. Black participants reported lower perceived stress scores compared to White participants. Participants whose gender was nonbinary or genderqueer had higher hair cortisol values compared to those who identified as male. Older participants had higher hair cortisol values compared to younger participants.

DISCUSSION

Previous researchers have similarly found no correlation between self-report stress scales and cortisol values, increased stress experience among nonbinary or genderqueer individuals compared to cisgender individuals, and a positive correlation between aging and stress. Yet, our finding that Black participants reported lower stress levels than White participants is unexpected. Our study demonstrates a high correlation between hair and nail cortisol values, suggesting the potential to substitute these markers as needed.

Hair and nail cortisol levels are associated and affected by glucocorticoid use

Hair and nail cortisol is increasingly studied as a physiologic proxy for chronic stress response. Glucocorticoid use is an expected confounder for cortisol measurement, yet there remains little evidence of whether external cortisol use should be subject to exclusion in study subjects. In a group of 209 youth (15-22 year-olds), we analyzed hair and fingernail cortisol concentrations. We assessed topical, nasal, oral, and injectable glucocorticoid use via a questionnaire. Extensively validated methods were used for hair and nail cortisol extraction and measurements. The median value of hair cortisol was 10.2 pg/mg (n=200), and the median value of nail cortisol was 7.06 pg/mg (n=203). Topical glucocorticoid use significantly increased hair and nail cortisol concentrations (p<0.005). Hair and nail cortisol concentrations were positively associated (p<0.0001, n=194). Spearman correlation coefficients demonstrated that the positive correlation between hair and nail cortisol values was higher in participants who used external glucocorticoids. Topical glucocorticoids moderated the association between hair and nail cortisol values (p=0.006). Based on these findings, we recommend that the assessment of topical glucocorticoid use must be performed when collecting hair/nail samples and that subjects reporting glucocorticoid use should be excluded from all future hair and nail cortisol studies; also, all outliers must be excluded to account for glucocorticoid medication underreporting and yet-unknown confounders.

Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Game Plan for PrEP: A Brief, Web and Text Message Intervention to Help Sexual Minority Men Adhere to PrEP and Reduce Their Alcohol Use

Suboptimal adherence to oral PrEP medications, particularly among younger sexual minority men (SMM), continues to be a key barrier to achieving more substantial declines in new HIV infections. Although variety of interventions, including web and text-message-based applications, have successfully addressed PrEP adherence, very few have addressed the potential influence of alcohol. This pilot study explored whether the Game Plan for PrEP, a brief, web-based and text messaging intervention, helped promote PrEP persistence and adherence and reduced condomless sex and alcohol use. Seventy-three heavy-drinking SMM on PrEP were recruited online from states with Ending the HIV Epidemic jurisdictions and randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either the Game Plan for PrEP intervention or an attention-matched control. We collected online surveys assessing primary outcomes at one, three, and six months post-enrollment. As secondary outcomes, we also collected dried blood spot samples at baseline, three, and six months to analyze for biomarkers of PrEP and alcohol use. Our results showed that the odds of stopping PrEP or experiencing a clinically meaningful lapse in PrEP adherence (≥ 4 consecutive missed doses) were not different across the two conditions. We also did not find evidence of any differences in condomless sex or drinking outcomes across conditions, although participants in both conditions reported drinking less often over time. These findings were consistent across both self-reported outcomes and biomarkers. Overall, we did not find evidence that our brief, web and text messaging intervention encouraged more optimal PrEP coverage or moderate their alcohol use.

The effect of dose-interval on antibody response to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines: a prospective cohort study

Background

Vaccination against COVID-19 is highly effective in preventing severe disease and hospitalization, but primary COVID mRNA vaccination schedules often differed from those recommended by the manufacturers due to supply chain issues. We investigated the impact of delaying the second dose on antibody responses to COVID mRNA-vaccines in a prospective cohort of health-care workers in Quebec.

Methods

We recruited participants from the McGill University Health Centre who provided serum or participant-collected dried blood samples (DBS) at 28-days, 3 months, and 6 months post-second dose and at 28-days after a third dose. IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV2 spike (S), the receptor-binding domain (RBD), nucleocapsid (N) and neutralizing antibodies to the ancestral strain were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). We examined associations between long (≤89 days) versus short (<89 days) between-dose intervals and antibody response through multivariable mixed-effects models adjusted for age, sex, prior covid infection status, time since vaccine dose, and assay batch.

Findings

The cohort included 328 participants who received up to three vaccine doses (>80% Pfizer-BioNTech). Weighted averages of the serum (n=744) and DBS (n=216) cohort results from the multivariable models showed that IgG anti-S was 31% higher (95% CI: 12% to 53%) and IgG anti-RBD was 37% higher (95% CI: 14% to 65%) in the long vs. short interval participants, across all time points.

Interpretation

Our study indicates that extending the covid primary series between-dose interval beyond 89 days (approximately 3 months) provides stronger antibody responses than intervals less than 89 days. Our demonstration of a more robust antibody response with a longer between dose interval is reassuring as logistical and supply challenges are navigated in low-resource settings.