Relationship between prolactin, breast cancer risk, and antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia: a critical review

Multimorbidity and the Etiology of Schizophrenia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A global study of multimorbidity in schizophrenia, especially of the association with physical conditions, might offer much needed etiological insights.

RECENT FINDINGS

Our review suggests that life-style factors and medication related to schizophrenia are only part of the explanation of the increase in risk for cardiovascular, metabolic, pulmonary disorders, and some cancers. Positive associations with autoimmune disorders (with the exception of rheumatoid arthritis) and epilepsy are promising avenues of research but to date have not been fully exploited. The same holds for the negative comorbidity seen for rheumatoid arthritis and some cancers (e.g., prostate). As a whole, our review suggests that most of the explored conditions have a different prevalence in schizophrenia than in the general population. Several hypotheses emerged from this review such as the role of immune and genetic factors, of sex hormones, and of more general variability factors.

Antipsychotic Use and Risk of Breast Cancer in Women With Severe Mental Illness: Replication of a Nationwide Nested Case-Control Database Study

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS

Breast cancer is more prevalent in women with severe mental illness than in the general population, and use of prolactin-increasing antipsychotics may be a contributing factor.

STUDY DESIGN

A nested case-control study was conducted using the Swedish nationwide registers (inpatient/outpatient care, sickness absence, disability pension, prescribed drugs, cancers). All women aged 18-85 years with schizophrenia/schizoaffective/other nonaffective psychotic disorder/bipolar disorder and breast cancer (cases) were matched for age, primary psychiatric diagnosis, and disease duration with five women without cancer (controls). The association between cumulative exposure to prolactin-increasing/prolactin-sparing antipsychotics and breast cancer was analyzed using conditional logistic regression, adjusted for comorbidities and co-medications.

STUDY RESULTS

Among 132 061 women, 1642 (1.24%) developed breast cancer between 2010 and 2021, at a mean age of 63.3 ± 11.8 years. Compared with 8173 matched controls, the odds of breast cancer increased in women with prior exposure to prolactin-increasing antipsychotics for 1-4 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-1.41), and for ≥ 5 years (aOR = 1.47, 95%CI = 1.26-1.71). There were no increased or decreased odds of breast cancer with exposure to prolactin-sparing antipsychotics of either 1-4 years (aOR = 1.17, 95%CI = 0.98-1.40) or ≥5 years (aOR = 0.99, 95%CI = 0.78-1.26). The results were consistent across all sensitivity analyses (ie, according to different age groups, cancer types, and primary psychiatric diagnosis).

CONCLUSIONS

Although causality remains uncertain, exposure to prolactin-elevating antipsychotics for ≥ 1 year was associated with increased odds of breast cancer in women with severe mental illness. When prescribing antipsychotics, a shared decision-making process should consider individual risk factors for breast cancer.

Exposure to psychotropic drugs and breast cancer risk in patients with bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder: a nested case-control study

Breast cancer is one of the most prevalent and serious types of cancer globally. Previous literature has shown that women with mental illness may have an increased risk of breast cancer, however whether this risk is associated with the use of psychotropic drugs has yet to be elucidated. This study aimed to assess such risk among women with major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder (BD). A nested case-control study design was used with data obtained from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Logistic regression analysis with adjustments for demographic characteristics, medical and mental comorbidities, and all-cause clinical visits was performed to estimate the risk of breast cancer according to the cumulative defined daily dose (cDDD) of psychotropic drugs. The study included 1564 women with MDD or BD who had breast cancer, and 15,540 women with MDD or BD who did not have breast cancer. After adjusting for important confounders, the long-term use of valproic acid (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval: 0.58, 0.39-0.56, cDDD ≥ 365), citalopram (0.58, 0.37-0.91, cDDD 180-365), and sertraline (0.77, 0.61-0.91, cDDD ≥ 365) was associated with a lower risk of breast cancer compared to a cDDD < 30. The short-term use of fluvoxamine (0.82, 0.69-0.96, cDDD 30-180), olanzapine (0.54, 0.33-0.89, cDDD 30-179), risperidone (0.7, 0.51-0.98, cDDD 30-179), and chlorpromazine (0.48, 0.25-0.90, cDDD 30-179) was associated with a lower risk of breast cancer. We found no evidence of an increased risk of breast cancer in patients with MDD or BD receiving psychotropic drugs.

Dopamine partial agonists: a discrete class of antipsychotics

Worldwide, there are now three marketed dopamine D2 partial agonists: aripiprazole, brexpiprazole and cariprazine. These three drugs share a number of properties other than their action at D2 receptors. Pharmacologically, they are 5HT2 antagonists and D3 and 5HT1A partial agonists but with little or no alpha-adrenergic, anticholinergic or antihistaminic activity. They also share a long duration of action. Clinically, D2 partial agonists are effective antipsychotics and generally have useful antimanic and antidepressant activity. They are usually well tolerated, causing akathisia and insomnia only at the start of treatment, and are non-sedating. These drugs also share a very low risk of increased prolactin and of weight gain and accompanying metabolic effects. They may also have a relatively low risk of tardive dyskinesia. There is some evidence that they are preferred by patients to dopamine antagonists. Individual dopamineD2 partial agonists have much in common and as a group they differ importantly from dopamine D2 antagonists. Dopamine D2 partial agonists should be considered a distinct class of antipsychotics.Key pointsD2 partial agonists share many pharmacological and clinical propertiesD2 partial agonists differ in several important respects from D2 antagonistsD2 partial agonists should be considered a discrete class of antipsychotics.

Prolactin and morning cortisol concentrations in antipsychotic naïve first episode psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

Alterations in prolactin and cortisol levels have been reported in antipsychotic naïve patients with first episode psychosis (FEP). However, it has been studied in very small samples, and inter-group variability has never been studied before.

OBJECTIVE

To provide estimates of standardized mean differences (SMD) and inter-group variability for prolactin, cortisol awakening response (CAR) and morning cortisol concentrations in antipsychotic naïve FEP (AN-FEP) patients and healthy controls (HC).

DATA SOURCES

BIOSIS, KCI, MEDLINE, Russian Science Citation Index, SciELO, Cochrane, PsycINFO, Web of Science were searched from inception to February 28, 2022.

STUDY SELECTION

Peer-reviewed cohort studies that reported on prolactin or cortisol blood concentrations in AN- FEP patients and HC were included.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Study characteristics, means and standard deviations (SD) were extracted from each article. Inter group differences in magnitude of effect were estimated using Hedges g. Inter-group variability was estimated with the coefficient of variation ratio (CVR). In both cases estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Differences by study-level characteristics were estimated using meta-regression. PRISMA guideline was followed (No. CRD42022303555).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Prolactin, CAR and morning cortisol blood concentrations in AN-FEP group in relation to HC group.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies for prolactin (N = 761 for AN-FEP group, N = 687 for HC group) and twelve studies for morning cortisol (N = 434 for AN-FEP group, N = 528 for HC group) were included. No studies were found in CAR in AN-FEP patients. Mean SMD for prolactin blood concentration was 0.88 (95% CI 0.57, 1.20) for male and 0.56 (95% CI 0.26, 0.87) for female. As a group, AN-FEP presented greater inter-group variability for prolactin levels than HC (CVR=1.28, 95% CI 1.02, 1.62). SMD for morning cortisol concentrations was non-significant: 0.34 (95% CI -0.01, 0.69) and no inter-group variability significant differences were detected: CVR= 1.05 (95% CI 0.91, 1.20). Meta-regression analyses for age and quality were non-significant. Funnel plots did not suggest a publication bias.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Increased prolactin levels were found in AN-FEP patients. A greater inter-group variability in the AN-FEP group suggests the existence of patient subgroups with different prolactin levels. No significant abnormalities were found in morning cortisol levels. Further research is needed to clarify whether prolactin concentrations could be used as an illness biomarker.

Association between long-term use of prolactin-elevating antipsychotics in women and the risk of breast cancer: What are the clinical implications?

BACKGROUND

Some antipsychotic drugs elevate prolactin, and hyperprolactinaemia is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. Women with schizophrenia have an increased incidence of breast cancer, but also multiple risk factors for the condition.

METHOD

This paper will critically review recent epidemiological studies concerning antipsychotics and breast cancer from a psychiatric perspective.

RESULTS

Two recent epidemiological studies have found an association between use of prolactin-elevating antipsychotics and breast cancer in women with schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. Prolactin-elevating drugs include paliperidone, risperidone, amisulpride and haloperidol, whilst prolactin-sparing antipsychotics included aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, cariprazine and quetiapine. In the two studies, estimated increased risks of breast cancer were disconcertingly high (up to 62%), but a third recent study found only a weak dose-response association. There are extensive methodological complications in this research, including the extent to which studies measure other risk factors for breast cancer and disagreement about the extent of prolactin elevation by some antipsychotics.

CONCLUSION

Although causation between prolactin elevating antipsychotics and breast cancer in women has not been demonstrated, recent epidemiological reports are worrying. For women on antipsychotics, informed consent should ideally include discussion of breast cancer concerns within the wider context of treatment benefits and risks.

A preliminary study to identify existing drugs for potential repurposing in breast cancer based on side effect profile

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related death in women after lung cancer. The present study aims to identify potential drug candidates using the PROMISCUOUS database for breast cancer based on side effect profile and then proceed with in silico and in vitro studies. PROMISCUOUS database was used to construct a group of drugs that share maximum side effects with letrozole. Based on the existing literature, ropinirole, risperidone, pregabalin, and gabapentin were selected for in silico and in vitro studies. The molecular docking was carried out using AUTODOCK 4.2.6. MCF-7 cell line was used to evaluate the anti-cancer activity of the selected drugs. PROMISCUOUS database revealed that as many as 23 existing drugs shared between 62 and 79 side-effects with letrozole. From docking result, we found that, ropinirole showed a good binding affinity (-7.7 kcal/mol) against aromatase compared to letrozole (-7.1 kcal/mol) which was followed by gabapentin (-6.4 kcal/mol), pregabalin (-5.7 kcal/mol) and risperidone (-5.1 kcal/mol). From the in vitro results, ropinirole and risperidone showed good anti-cancer activity of IC₅₀ with 40.85±11.02 μg/ml and 43.10±9.58 μg/ml cell viability. Based on this study results and existing literature we conclude that risperidone, pregabalin, and gabapentin are not ideal candidates for repurposing in breast cancer but ropinirole could be an excellent choice for repurposing in breast cancer after further studies.

Peony-Glycyrrhiza Decoction for Antipsychotic-Related Hyperprolactinemia in Patients with Schizophrenia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Most antipsychotic drugs are dopamine receptor antagonists that usually lead to abnormal increases in prolactin concentrations and the development of hyperprolactinemia (HPRL), which in turn causes sexual dysfunction in patients. Peony-Glycyrrhiza Decoction (PGD) enhanced dopamine D2 receptors (DRD2) and dopamine transporter (DAT) and significantly reversed the expression of DRD2 and DAT. Therefore, we hypothesized that PGD might effectively improve hyperprolactinemia and alleviate sexual dysfunction in patients.

Methods

We performed an 8-week randomized controlled study on 62 subjects with schizophrenia who were randomized into two groups. The experimental group was treated with the PGD intervention, and the control group did not receive treatment. The primary outcome indicators were the levels of sex hormones and the total Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX) score.

Results

There was a significant difference in PRL levels between the two groups at weeks 4 and 8. From the beginning to the end of the experiment, there was a significant increase in PRL levels in the control group, while there was no significant change in the experimental group. The ASEX scale assessed sexual function in both groups, and patients in the experimental group showed an improvement in sexual function at week 8. During the experiment, the two groups found no differences between Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scores and Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (TESS) scores.

Conclusion

PGD significantly improved the patient's sexual function but was less effective in reducing prolactin levels and may prevent further increases in prolactin levels.

Antipsychotic exposure is an independent risk factor for breast cancer: A systematic review of epidemiological evidence

Background

The effect of antipsychotics on breast cancer remains controversial.

Materials and methods

Embase, Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Hebei Medical University Library were used for the literature search. Observational studies with original data for the effects of antipsychotics on breast cancer were used. Studies of bed quality, those with inadequate sample size, incomplete follow-up works, or studies that did not meet the criteria were excluded. Meta-analysis was performed using R version 4.1.2. The odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to evaluate the proportion of breast cancer in different groups. To detect possible sources of heterogeneity, subgroup and meta-regression analyses were employed.

Results

Pooled data from 11 relevant studies with 1,499,001 participants suggested that individuals exposed to antipsychotics were more likely to suffer from breast cancer than those who were not exposed (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.04-1.47). No significant difference in breast cancer prevalence between the atypical and typical antipsychotic groups was found (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.93-1.63). Prolactin (PRL)-increasing and PRL-sparing antipsychotics posed a similar risk of breast cancer (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, approximately 0.97-1.31). Furthermore, the use of antipsychotics is attributed to increased mortality in patients with breast cancer (OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.29-1.82). Those exposed to antipsychotics at the maximum dose were more likely to suffer from breast cancer than those exposed to the minimum dose.

Conclusions

Antipsychotic exposure is an independent risk factor for breast cancer. No significant difference in the risk of breast cancer between typical and atypical antipsychotics was noted. Those exposed to antipsychotics at higher doses are more likely to suffer from breast cancer. Moreover, the use of antipsychotics is attributed to increased mortality in patients with breast cancer. PRL-increasing and PRL-sparing antipsychotics pose a similar risk of breast cancer.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022307624.

Risk of Breast Cancer in Association with the Use of Second-generation Antipsychotics

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies regarding the relationship between the risk of breast cancer (BC) and antipsychotics use have reported inconsistent findings. Insufficient sample size and/or observation period may have hindered revealing the risk of BC associated with antipsychotics use. We aimed to investigate whether the use of second-generation antipsychotics (SGA) is associated with increased risk of BC.

METHODS

We used the Health Insurance Review Agency database in South Korea between 2008 and 2018. The index date was determined as the date of the first antipsychotic prescription. We selected women prescribed SGAs for more than 30 days within a year from the index date and age-matched controls, yielding 498,970 cases and 997,940 controls. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used for estimating the risk.

RESULTS

The incidence rates of BC were 109.74 and 101.51 per 100,000 person-years in the case and control groups, respectively. There was an increased risk of BC in the case group (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.13). There was a higher risk of BC in subjects prescribed with ≥ 10,000 mg of olanzapine equivalent dose (HR = 1.29, 95% CI 1.14-1.46) than those with < 10,000 mg (HR = 1.05, 95% CI 1.00-1.11). The increased risk of BC in the case group became significant after six years of the observation period (≥ 6 years: HR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.14-1.35, 3 to < 6 years: HR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.97-1.15, < 3 years: HR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.95-1.09).

CONCLUSION

This study indicated that the use of SGAs is associated with increased risk of BC in a long-term relationship with a dose-response pattern.

DRD1 and DRD4 are differentially expressed in breast tumors and breast cancer stem cells: pharmacological implications

BACKGROUND

Abnormal expression of dopamine receptors (DRs) has been described in multiple tumors, but their roles in breast cancer are inconclusive or contradictory since evidence of pro- and anti-tumoral effects have been reported. Herein, we analyzed the expression of DRs in breast cancer, especially in the subpopulation of cancer stem cells (CSCs), and evaluated the functional role of the receptors by pharmacological targeting.

METHODS

Expression of DRD1, DRD2, DRD3, DRD4 and DRD5 was investigated in human breast tumors and cancer cell lines using public databases. Correlation between gene expression and clinical outcome was studied by Kaplan-Mayer analyses. By flow cytometry, we assessed DRD1, DRD2, and DRD4 expression in cultures of MCF-7 (luminal) and MDA-MB-231 (triple-negative) cells. Using the previously reported SORE6 reporter system we examined the differential expression of DRD1, DRD2, and DRD4 in CSCs and tumor-bulk cells. The effect of pharmacological modulation of DRs on stemness and cell migration was studied by quantification of the reporter-positive fraction and wound healing assays, respectively.

RESULTS

DRD1, DRD2 and DRD4 transcripts were expressed in breast tumors. DRD4 was overexpressed compared to normal tissue and showed prognostic value. DRD1, DRD2 and DRD4 transcripts were also found in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells, but only DRD1 and DRD4 proteins were detected. DRD4 was underexpressed in CSCs compared to tumor-bulk cells, whereas DRD1 was found only in the CSCs fraction, suggesting that those receptors may have relevance in stemness control. Subtoxic concentrations of DRD1-targeting compounds did not induced significant changes in the CSCs pool. On the other hand, DRD4 inhibition by Haloperidol slightly increased the CSCs content but also reduced cell migration.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacological modulation of DRD1 in MCF-7 or MDA-MB-231 cells seems to be irrelevant for stemness maintenance. DRD4 reduced expression in breast CSCs or its inhibition by Haloperidol favors CSCs-pool expansion. DRD4 inhibition can also reduce cell migration, indicating that DRD4 plays different roles in stem and non-stem breast cancer cells.

The Risk of Antipsychotic Drugs on Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association between the consumption of antipsychotic drugs and breast cancer.

METHODS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis study, relevant studies were extracted from different databases including PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane, Medline, and additional sources. The selected studies were statistically analyzed and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

RESULTS

Of a total of 11 studies selected, five were case-control type and six were cohort type. The overall study quality was 6.7. Meta-analysis of the five case-control studies (which together had 81 766 breast cancer patients and 1 150 316 control participants) showed no significant association between the overall use of antipsychotic drugs and the incidence of breast cancer (odds ratio = 1.06; 95% CI: 0.94-1.19; p =0.36). Q-test results showed evidence of heterogeneity (p < 0.10) in the overall analysis. The I2 statistical assessment also show evidence of heterogeneity (I2> 75%).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of antipsychotic drugs does not significantly increase the risk of breast cancer.

Mendelian Randomization and GWAS Meta Analysis Revealed the Risk-Increasing Effect of Schizophrenia on Cancers

The causal relationship between cancer and Schizophrenia (SCZ) remains controversial. Some researchers have found that SCZ is a cancer-preventive factor in cohort studies or meta-analyses, whereas others have found the opposite. To understand more about this issue, we used two-sample Mendelian randomization (2SMR) on available GWAS summary results to evaluate potential genetic connections between SCZ and 13 cancers. We discovered that the genetic susceptibility to schizophrenia lead to an increasing risk of breast cancer (odds ratio [OR] per log-odds increase in schizophrenia risk: 1.049, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.023–1.075; p = 0.00012; FDR = 0.0017), ovarian cancer (OR, 1.326; 95% CI, 1.267–1.387; p = 0.0007; FDR = 0.0045), and thyroid cancer (OR, 1.575; 95% CI, 1.048–2.365; p = 0.0285; FDR = 0.123). Secondly, we performed a meta-analysis based on the GWAS summary statistics of SCZ and the three significant cancers. Next, we associated genetic variants to genes using two gene mapping strategies: (a) positional mapping based on genomic proximity and (b) expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) mapping based on gene expression linkage across multiple tissues. As a result, we identified 114 shared loci and 437 shared genes in three groups, respectively. Functional enrichment analysis shows that the most enriched biological pathways are related to epigenetic modification. In addition, we noticed that SCZ would affect the level of thyroid-stimulating hormone (OR, 1.095; 95% CI, 1.006–1.191; p = 0.0354; FDR = 0.177), which may further affect the level of estrogen and the risk of the above three cancers. In conclusion, our findings under the 2SMR assumption provide crucial insights into the risk-increasing effect of SCZ on three cancers’ risk. Furthermore, these results may provide insights into understanding the genetic predisposition and underlying biological pathways of comorbid SCZ and cancers.

Association of antipsychotic use with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies with over 2 million individuals

AIMS

Despite reports of an elevated risk of breast cancer associated with antipsychotic use in women, existing evidence remains inconclusive. We aimed to examine existing observational data in the literature and determine this hypothesised association.

METHODS

We searched Embase, PubMed and Web of Science™ databases on 27 January 2022 for articles reporting relevant cohort or case-control studies published since inception, supplemented with hand searches of the reference lists of the included articles. Quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We generated the pooled odds ratio (OR) and pooled hazard ratio (HR) using a random-effects model to quantify the association. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022307913).

RESULTS

Nine observational studies, including five cohort and four case-control studies, were eventually included for review (N = 2 031 380) and seven for meta-analysis (N = 1 557 013). All included studies were rated as high-quality (seven to nine stars). Six studies reported a significant association of antipsychotic use with breast cancer, and a stronger association was reported when a greater extent of antipsychotic use, e.g. longer duration, was operationalised as the exposure. Pooled estimates of HRs extracted from cohort studies and ORs from case-control studies were 1.39 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-1.73] and 1.37 (95% CI 0.90-2.09), suggesting a moderate association of antipsychotic use with breast cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Antipsychotic use is moderately associated with breast cancer, possibly mediated by prolactin-elevating properties of certain medications. This risk should be weighed against the potential treatment effects for a balanced prescription decision.

Cancer incidence and stage at diagnosis among people with psychotic disorders: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Research regarding the incidence of cancer among people with psychotic disorders relative to the general population is equivocal, although the evidence suggests that they have more advanced stage cancer at diagnosis. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the incidence and stage at diagnosis of cancer among people with, relative to those without, psychotic disorders. We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases. Articles were included if they reported the incidence and/or stage at diagnosis of cancer in people with psychotic disorders. Random effects meta-analyses were used to determine risk of cancer and odds of advanced stage cancer at diagnosis in people with psychosis, relative to those without psychotic disorders. A total of 40 articles were included in the review, of which, 31 were included in the meta-analyses. The pooled age-adjusted risk ratio for all cancers in people with psychotic disorders was 1.08 (95% CI: 1.01-1.15), relative to those without psychotic disorders, with significant heterogeneity by cancer site. People with psychotic disorders had a higher incidence of breast, oesophageal, colorectal, testicular, uterine, and cervical cancer, and a lower incidence of skin, prostate, and thyroid cancer. People with psychotic disorders also had 22% higher (95% CI: 2-46%) odds of metastases at diagnosis, compared to those without psychotic disorders. Our systematic review found a significant difference in overall cancer incidence among people diagnosed with psychotic disorders and people with psychotic disorders were more likely to present with advanced stage cancer at diagnosis. This finding may reflect a need for improved access to and uptake of cancer screening for patients diagnosed with psychotic disorders.

Doxorubicin induced aggregation of α-synuclein: Insights into the mechanism of drug induced Parkinsonism

The aggregation of α-synuclein is a prominent feature of Parkinson's disease. It is induced by factors such as genetic mutations and presence of metal salts leading to Parkinson's like symptoms. Existing case studies show that patients undergoing cancer chemotherapeutics are also prone to developing Parkinson's like symptoms. However, the underlying cause behind onset of these symptoms is not understood. It is not clear whether the administration of chemotherapeutic drugs alter the structural stability of α-synuclein. In the present study, we address this question by looking into the effect of chemotherapeutic drug namely doxorubicin on the α-synuclein stability. Using complementary spectroscopic, molecular docking and imaging techniques, we observe that doxorubicin interacted with central aggregation prone region of α-synuclein and induces destabilization leading to aggregation. We also show that the combination of doxorubicin and L-DOPA drugs impedes the α-synuclein aggregation. This may explain the reason behind the effectiveness of using L-DOPA against Parkinson's like symptoms.

Osteoporosis referral and treatment among people with severe mental illness: A ten-year data linkage study

INTRODUCTION

People with severe mental illness (SMI) are at increased risk of osteoporosis but minimal information is available on their treatment and referral. We investigated differences in these outcomes between patients with/without SMI in linked primary and specialist care data.

METHODS

People with SMI aged 18+ at diagnosis with both primary and mental healthcare records between 1st May 2009 and 31st May 2019 from a south London catchment were matched 1:4 to randomly selected controls on gender, age and duration of primary care follow-up. Outcomes included prescription of osteoporosis medications and referrals for osteoporosis, analysed using multivariable logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

The study included 2269 people with SMI and 9069 matched non-SMI controls. People with SMI were more likely to have a recorded prescription of osteoporosis medications (odds ratio [OR] = 3.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.87, 4.35) and be referred for osteoporosis (OR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.09, 2.08) within 2 years after the date of first SMI diagnosis after adjusting for ethnicity, deprivation and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Factors including older age (osteoporosis medications: OR = 1.04, 95% CI 1.03, 1.05; osteoporosis referral: OR = 1.05, 95% CI 1.04, 1.07) and being prescribed with Class A analgesics (osteoporosis medications: OR = 1.91, 95% CI 1.31, 2.77; osteoporosis referral: OR = 1.77, 95% CI 1.02, 3.07) are significant predictors for osteoporosis management pathways within SMI patients.

CONCLUSION

People with SMI are more frequently prescribed medications for osteoporosis and referred to osteoporosis screening than the general population. Given the many risk factors for osteoporosis in this group, this increased rate of referrals may well be warranted, and there is need to pay more attention to this at-risk group. Screening studies are needed to determine whether the rate of referral is proportional to the need.

Gynecological Health Concerns in Women with Schizophrenia and Related Disorders: A Narrative Review of Recent Studies

Sex and age are important factors influencing physical and mental health in schizophrenia. Our goal was to review the recent literature for associations between gynecological conditions and psychotic illness and to propose integrated strategies for their management in order to improve overall health outcomes in women. We addressed the following questions: What are the prevalence and risk factors of gynecological disorders in women with schizophrenia or delusional disorder (DD)? What are the rates of uptake of gynecological cancer screening and mortality in this population? What role does menopause play? We found an increased incidence of breast cancer in women with schizophrenia. Other gynecological comorbidities were less frequent, but the field has been understudied. Low rates of breast and cervical cancer screening characterize women with schizophrenia. Menopause, because of endocrine changes, aging effects, and resultant comorbidity is associated with high rates of aggressive breast cancer in this population. Uterine and ovarian cancers have been less investigated. Psychosocial determinants of health play an important role in cancer survival. The findings lead to the recommendation that primary care, psychiatry, gynecology, oncology, and endocrinology collaborate in early case finding, in research into etiological links, and in improvement of prevention and treatment.

Risk of Breast Cancer With Prolactin Elevating Antipsychotic Drugs: An Observational Study of US Women (Ages 18-64 Years)

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND

Antipsychotic drugs are well established to alter circulating prolactin levels by blocking dopamine D2 receptors in the pituitary. Prolactin activates many genes important in the development of breast cancer. Prior studies have found an association with antipsychotic use and risk of breast cancer.

METHODS/PROCEDURES

The IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicaid Databases were used to establish a large, observational cohort of women taking antipsychotics drugs compared with anticonvulsants or lithium. A new user design was used that required 12 months of insurance enrollment before the first antipsychotic or anticonvulsant/lithium prescription. Invasive breast cancer was identified using diagnostic codes. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the risk of breast cancer with antipsychotic drug exposure controlling for age and other risk factors.

FINDINGS/RESULTS

A total of 914 cases (0.16%) of invasive breast cancer were identified among 540,737 women. Exposure to all antipsychotics was independently associated with a 35% increased risk of breast cancer (aHR [adjusted hazard ratio], 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-1.61). Category 1 drugs (high prolactin) were associated with a 62% increased risk (aHR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.30-2.03), category 2 drugs a 54% increased risk (aHR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.19-1.99), and category 3 drugs were not associated with breast cancer risk.

IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS

In the largest study of antipsychotics taken by US women, a higher risk between antipsychotic drug use and increased risk for breast cancer was observed, with a differential higher association with antipsychotic categories that elevate prolactin. Our study confirms other recent observational studies of increased breast cancer risk with antipsychotics that elevate prolactin.

Disparities and inequalities in cancer care and outcomes in patients with severe mental illness: Call to action

OBJECTIVES

People with severe mental illness (SMI) are at extreme risk of being stigmatized and to receive poor quality physical care. It has been demonstrated that they have higher morbidity and poorer prognosis of several medical diseases than the general population, with an at least 10-20-year reduction in life expectancy.

METHODS

A special issue of Psycho-Oncology focusing on cancer care among patients affected by SMI was called by the Editorial Board of the journal, with the aim to explore cancer health disparities and inequalities among people with SMI, mortality from cancer, problems of communication between multidisciplinary oncology and psychiatric teams and need for more structured intervention (i.e., screening, prevention, treatment).

RESULTS

Authors from eight countries contributed. The problem of stigma and barriers to cancer care provision for patients with SMI were studied (e.g., the complex nature of SMI and healthcare providers' misunderstanding of SMI). Key barriers were related to both patients, clinicians and institutional problems, such as fragmentation of care. A higher mortality from cancer and poor knowledge about cancer risk-factors was shown in patients with SMI. Models of intervention were also proposed.

CONCLUSIONS

Several conclusions have been recommended by the authors, such as the need for guidelines and clinical procedures specific for cancer care in mental health settings; large-scale studies to address the disparities of care in people with SMI; a larger vision of psychosocial oncology as the facilitator of the liaison between oncology and psychiatry.

Breast cancer in schizophrenia could be interleukin-33-mediated

Recent epidemiological and genetic studies have revealed an interconnection between schizophrenia and breast cancer. The mutual underlying pathophysiological mechanisms may be immunologically driven. A new cluster of molecules called alarmins may be involved in sterile brain inflammation, and we have already reported the potential impact of interleukin-33 (IL-33) on positive symptoms onset and the role of its soluble trans-membranes full length receptor (sST2) on amelioration of negative symptoms in schizophrenia genesis. Furthermore, these molecules have already been shown to be involved in breast cancer etiopathogenesis. In this review article, we aim to describe the IL-33/suppressor of tumorigenicity 2 (ST2) axis as a crossroad in schizophrenia-breast cancer comorbidity. Considering that raloxifene could be tissue-specific and improve cognition and that tamoxifen resistance in breast carcinoma could be improved by strategies targeting IL-33, these selective estrogen receptor modulators could be useful in complementary treatment. These observations could guide further somatic, as well as psychiatric therapeutical protocols by incorporating what is known about immunity in schizophrenia.

Association of Diabetes Mellitus and Alcohol Abuse with Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Significance

Diabetes mellitus (DM), one of the metabolic diseases which is characterized by sustained hyperglycemia, is a life-threatening disease. The global prevalence of DM is on the rise, mainly in low- and middle-income countries. Diabetes is a major cause of blindness, heart attacks, kidney failure, stroke, and lower limb amputation. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a form of diabetes that is characterized by high blood sugar and insulin resistance. T2DM can be prevented or delayed by a healthy diet, regular physical activity, maintaining normal body weight, and avoiding alcohol and tobacco use. Ethanol and its metabolites can cause differentiation defects in stem cells and promote inflammatory injury and carcinogenesis in several tissues. Recent studies have suggested that diabetes can be treated, and its consequences can be avoided or delayed with proper management. DM has a greater risk for several cancers, such as breast, colorectal, endometrial, pancreatic, gallbladder, renal, and liver cancer. The incidence of cancer is significantly higher in patients with DM than in those without DM. In addition to DM, alcohol abuse is also a risk factor for many cancers. We present a review of the recent studies investigating the association of both DM and alcohol abuse with cancer incidence.

Antipsychotic use and risk of breast cancer in women with schizophrenia: a nationwide nested case-control study in Finland

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is more common in female patients with schizophrenia than in the general population. It is not known whether treatment with prolactin-increasing antipsychotics contributes to increased odds of breast cancer.

METHODS

We used Finnish nationwide registers of hospital treatment, prescription drug purchases, and cancer diagnoses to do a nested case-control study. Of women with schizophrenia, those with breast cancer (cases) were matched by age and duration of illness with five women without cancer (controls). Cases and controls were aged 18-85 years and exclusion criteria were any previous cancer diagnoses, receipt of organ transplant, mastectomy, or diagnosis of HIV. The main analysis was the association between cumulative exposure to prolactin-increasing drugs and breast cancer. The analyses were done with conditional logistic regression, by adjusting for comorbid conditions and concomitant medications. Ethnicity data were not available.

FINDINGS

Of 30 785 women diagnosed with schizophrenia between 1972 and 2014, 1069 were diagnosed with breast cancer between Jan 1, 2000, and Dec 31, 2017. Compared with 5339 matched controls, 1-4 years cumulative exposure (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0·95, 95% CI 0·73-1·25) or 5 or more years exposure (adjusted OR 1·19, 0·90-1·58) to prolactin-sparing antipsychotics (including clozapine, quetiapine, or aripiprazole) was not associated with an increased risk of breast cancer in comparison with minimal exposure (<1 year). When compared with less than 1 year of exposure to prolactin-increasing antipsychotics (all other antipsychotics), 1-4 years of exposure was not associated with an increased risk, but exposure for 5 or more years was associated with an increased risk (adjusted OR 1·56 [1·27-1·92], p<0·001). The risk for developing lobular adenocarcinoma associated with long-term use of prolactin-increasing antipsychotics (adjusted OR 2·36 [95% CI 1·46-3·82]) was higher than that of developing ductal adenocarcinoma (adjusted OR 1·42 [95% CI 1·12-1·80]).

INTERPRETATION

Long-term exposure to prolactin-increasing, but not to prolactin-sparing, antipsychotics is significantly associated with increased odds of breast cancer. Monitoring prolactinemia and addressing hyperprolactinemia is paramount in women with schizophrenia being treated with prolactin-increasing antipsychotics.

FUNDING

Finnish Ministry of Social Affairs and Health.

Prolactin and Estrogen Levels in Postmenopausal Women Receiving Aripiprazole Augmentation Treatment for Depression

BACKGROUND

Antipsychotic drugs are well established to alter serum prolactin levels, often resulting in adverse effects including amenorrhea, galactorrhea, osteoporosis, and loss of libido. There is growing preclinical evidence that prolactin-elevating drugs can instigate the progression of precancerous lesions to breast cancer and that genes activated by prolactin are associated with the development and proliferation of breast cancer. Current guides advise a cautious approach (weighing risks and benefits) to the administration of prolactin-elevating antipsychotic drugs in women with a previously detected breast cancer. Aripiprazole is known to be a prolactin-sparing antipsychotic; however, data regarding its effects on prolactin and estrogens in postmenopausal women are lacking.

METHODS

We examined serum hormone levels in n = 66 women who participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial of aripiprazole (high and low doses) added to an antidepressant in adults older than 60 years. Aripiprazole or placebo tablets were administered for 12 weeks as an augmentation strategy in venlafaxine-treated women. The primary outcomes were the difference in prolactin and estrogen levels.

RESULTS

There was no significant effect of aripiprazole treatment on prolactin or estrogen levels, including in models that divided groups into low and high doses: prolactin (P = 0.075), estrone (P = 0.67), and estradiol (P = 0.96).

CONCLUSIONS

Aripiprazole addition to an antidepressant did not alter serum estrogens or prolactin. These findings may be relevant in the treatment of some postmenopausal women with depression.

Risk of cancer in bipolar disorder and the potential role of lithium: International collaborative systematic review and meta-analyses

We examined bipolar disorder (BD) as a risk factor for developing cancer and the role of lithium on cancer incidence. We conducted two systematic review and meta-analyses of population-based studies providing data on these associations. We screened articles indexed in MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, and PsycINFO up to August 2020. The first random-effects meta-analysis, based on 4,910,661 individuals from nine studies estimated an increased risk of cancer of any kind [RR = 1.24 (1.05-1.46); p < 0.01], especially breast cancer [RR = 1.33 (1.15-1.55); p < 0.01] in BD. The second random-effects meta-analysis, based on 2,606,187 individuals from five studies did not show increased risk of cancer in people with BD using lithium, and even suggested a small protective effect both in overall [RR = 0.94 (0.72-1.22); p = 0.66] and urinary cancer [RR = 0.93 (0.75-1.14); p = 0.48] although these findings did not reach statistical significance. The current evidence highlights that cancer risk is increased in individuals with BD, particularly breast cancer in women. Lithium may have a potential protective effect on cancer, including urinary cancer. The role of lithium as a mainstay of treatment for BD is reinforced by this study.

Dopamine Receptors in Cancer: Are They Valid Therapeutic Targets?

The dopamine receptors (DRs) family includes 5 members with differences in signal transduction and ligand affinity. Abnormal DRs expression has been correlated multiple tumors with their clinical outcome. Thus, it has been proposed that DRs-targeting drugs-developed for other diseases as schizophrenia or Parkinson's disease-could be helpful in managing neoplastic diseases. In this review, we discuss the role of DRs and the effects of DRs-targeting in tumor progression and cancer cell biology using multiple high-prevalence neoplasms as examples. The evidence shows that DRs are valid therapeutic targets for certain receptor/disease combinations, but the data are inconclusive or contradictory for others. In either case, further studies are required to define the precise role of DRs in tumor progression and propose better therapeutic strategies for their targeting.

The Pharmacodynamics of Antipsychotic Drugs in Women and Men

Background: Animal and human experiments have confirmed sex differences in the expression of hepatic enzymes that metabolize antipsychotic drugs and that may, in this way, be partly responsible for the clinical sex/gender differences observed in the efficacy and tolerability of antipsychotic treatment. Aim: The aim of this mini review is to synthesize the literature on the pharmacodynamics of male/female differential response to antipsychotic drugs. Method: Relevant search terms were used to search for pre-clinical and human trials and analysis of antipsychotic differential drug response and occurrence/severity of adverse effects in women and men. Results: The search found that sex influences drug response via the amount of a given drug that enters the brain and the number of neurotransmitter receptors to which it can bind. Consequently, sex partly determines the efficacy of a specific drug and its liability to induce unwanted effects. There are other factors that can overshadow or enhance the dimorphic effect of sex, for instance, the host's age, hormonal status, diet and life style as well as the molecular structure of the drug and its dose, and the method of its administration. Most of all, the host's individual genetics affects each step of a drug's pharmacodynamics. Conclusion: On average, women's psychotic symptoms respond to antipsychotic drugs at doses lower than men's. This means that many women may be de facto overdosed and, thus, experience unnecessary adverse effects. That being said, factors such as genetics and age probably determine drug response and tolerability to a greater degree than do biological sex or gender social roles.

Safety and Efficacy of High-Dose Vitamin B6 as an Adjunctive Treatment for Antipsychotic-Induced Hyperprolactinemia in Male Patients With Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia

This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of high-dose vitamin B6 (vB6) as an adjunct treatment for antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia (AIHP) in male patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). In this randomized double-blinded controlled study, patients were randomized (1:1) into a control group given aripiprazole (ARI; 10 mg/day; n = 100) or an intervention group given vB6 (300 mg/12 h for 16 weeks; n = 100). Prolactin levels, psychotic symptoms [Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)], cognitive function [MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB)], liver function, kidney function, growth hormone level, micronutrient levels, blood lipids, and adverse secondary effects (ASEs)[Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (TESS) and Barnes-Akathisia scale] were monitored. After a 16-week treatment period, the vB6 group showed a 68.1% reduction in serum prolactin levels (from 95.52 ± 6.30 μg/L to 30.43 ± 18.65 μg/L) while the ARI group showed only a 37.4% reduction (from 89.07 ± 3.59 μg/L to 55.78 ± 7.39 μg/L). During weeks 1-4, both treatments reduced prolactin similarly. Subsequently, the ARI effect plateaued, while the vB6 effect remained robust. The vB6 group showed better alleviation of psychotic symptoms and cognitive impairment. No serious ASEs were observed; ASEs were more frequent in the ARI group. AIHP reduction efficacy of vB6 was associated with baseline prolactin and triglyceride levels, total vB6 dosage, and education level. In conclusion, compared with the ARI group, TRS patients given vB6 showed better attenuation of AIHP, lower ASE scores, and greater improvements in clinical symptoms and cognitive impairments. These results support further consideration of vB6 as a putative treatment for AIHP. Trial Registration: ChiCTR1800014755.

Post-diagnostic antipsychotic use and cancer mortality: a population based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Many antipsychotics elevate prolactin, a hormone implicated in breast cancer aetiology however no studies have investigated antipsychotic use in patients with breast cancer. This study investigated if antipsychotic use is associated with an increased risk of cancer-specific mortality among breast cancer patients.

METHODS

A cohort of 23,695 women newly diagnosed with a primary breast cancer between 1st January 1998 and 31st December 2012 was identified from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to English cancer-registries and followed for until 30th September 2015. Time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of breast cancer-specific mortality comparing use of antipsychotics with non-use, overall, and by prolactin elevating activitiy. Analyses were repeated restricting to patients with a history of severe mental illness to control for potential confounding by indication.

RESULTS

In total 848 patients were prescribed an antipsychotic and of which 162 died due to their breast cancer. Compared with non-use, antipsychotic use was associated with an increased risk of breast-cancer specific mortality (HR 2.25, 95%CI 1.90-2.67), but this did not follow a dose response relation. Restricting the cohort to patients with severe mental illness attenuated the association between antipsychotic use and breast cancer-specific mortality (HR 1.11, 95%CI 0.58-2.14).

CONCLUSIONS

In this population-based cohort of breast cancer patients, while the use of antipsychotics was associated with increased breast cancer-specific mortality, there was a lack of a dose response, and importantly null associations were observed in patients with severe mental illness, suggesting the observed association is likely a result of confounding by indication. This study provides an exemplar of confounding by indication, highlighting the importance of consideration of this important bias in studies of drug effects in cancer patients.

Antipsychotic-induced Hyperprolactinemia in aging populations: Prevalence, implications, prevention and management

This paper reviews the prevalence, implications, prevention and management of antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia in aging populations. Antipsychotics are indicated mainly for the treatment of psychotic illness but are also used in other conditions. Complications induced by antipsychotics increase with age, due to age-related changes in drug metabolism and excretion. Almost all antipsychotics lead to hyperprolactinemia by blocking dopamine D2 receptors in the anterior pituitary gland, which counteracts dopamine's inhibitory action on prolactin secretion. The main findings of this narrative review are that, though many of the known side effects of high prolactin levels lose their salience with age, the risk of exacerbating osteoporosis remains critical. Methods of preventing antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia in older individuals include using antipsychotic medication (AP) as sparingly as possible and monitoring AP serum levels, regularly measuring prolactin levels, closely monitoring bone density, treating substance abuse, and teaching patients stress management techniques. When hyperprolactinemia symptoms cannot be otherwise managed, adjunctive drugs are available. Potential helpful adjuncts are: dopamine agonists, antipsychotics with partial agonist properties (e.g. aripiprazole), selective estrogen receptor modulators, and metformin. Because a gold standard for prevention/treatment has not been established, clinical decisions need to be made based on safety and individual circumstance.

Evaluation of the physical health of adolescent in-patients in generic and secure services: retrospective case-note review

AIMS AND METHOD

To assess physical health needs of adolescent in-patients by routine monitoring. A retrospective analysis of case notes was conducted on a 6-month intake to generic and secure adolescent mental health units in Greater Manchester, UK.

RESULTS

Fifty individuals were admitted (52% female, average age 15.84 years). Diagnoses varied and 66% were prescribed medications before admission. All had a physical health assessment, which identified various physical health risk factors. Average body mass index was 25.99 (range 15.8-44), and increased during in-patient treatment for 84% of individuals who had their body mass recorded more than once. A total of 28% of individuals smoked. Lipids and prolactin levels were elevated across the sample.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

This evaluation strengthens the argument to optimise physical healthcare for adolescent in-patients and develop physical health interventions, particularly given that we observed elevated lipids and prolactin. Physical health and well-being may not be prioritised when assessing and managing young peoples' mental health, despite their increased vulnerability for comorbid conditions.

Diabetes as a Risk Factor for Breast Cancer

Diabetes is one of the most important chronic conditions worldwide, and breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer in women worldwide. Several types of research have been conducted to ascertain the link between diabetes and its potential for increasing the risk of breast cancer. This research aims to determine the relationship between diabetes and breast cancer; patients with diabetes have a higher risk than the general population of developing cancer, and diabetes patients have a higher incidence and mortality of breast cancer. This research also reviewed the relationship between cytokines, the mitogenic effect of insulin-like growth factors, and breast cells. The review includes searching the PubMed database using the keywords "diabetes," "breast cancer," "risk factor," and "premenopausal." The search returned 53 articles used for review of this article.

Evidence-based guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia: Updated recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology

These updated guidelines from the British Association for Psychopharmacology replace the original version published in 2011. They address the scope and targets of pharmacological treatment for schizophrenia. A consensus meeting was held in 2017, involving experts in schizophrenia and its treatment. They were asked to review key areas and consider the strength of the evidence on the risk-benefit balance of pharmacological interventions and the clinical implications, with an emphasis on meta-analyses, systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials where available, plus updates on current clinical practice. The guidelines cover the pharmacological management and treatment of schizophrenia across the various stages of the illness, including first-episode, relapse prevention, and illness that has proved refractory to standard treatment. It is hoped that the practice recommendations presented will support clinical decision making for practitioners, serve as a source of information for patients and carers, and inform quality improvement.

Mortality of site-specific cancer in patients with schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have reported contradicting results on the relationship between cancer mortality and schizophrenia. Our aim is to quantify the mortality rate of common site-specific cancers among patients with schizophrenia and to synthesize the available research evidence.

METHODS

We performed a systemic search of the PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases. Studies reporting the mortality rate of different cancer in patients with schizophrenia were included. A random-effects model was applied to calculate the pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs).

RESULTS

Seven studies consisting of 1,162,971 participants with schizophrenia were included in this meta-analysis. Data regarding mortality risk of breast, colon, lung and prostate cancer among schizophrenia patients were subjected to quantitative analysis. Pooled results showed significant increases in mortality risk of breast cancer (RR = 1.97, 95%CI 1.38-2.83), lung cancer (RR = 1.93, 95%CI 1.46-2.54) and colon cancer (RR = 1.69, 95%CI 1.60-1.80) in patients with schizophrenia compared with those in the general population or control group. The mortality risk of prostate cancer increased in male patients, although no significant difference was detected (RR = 1.58, 95% CI 0.79-3.15). Increased risks of mortality from lung and colon cancer were observed in female patients (RR = 2.49, 95%CI 2.40-2.59 and RR = 2.42, 95%CI 1.39-4.22, respectively) and elevated risks of mortality from lung and colon cancer in male patients (RR = 2.40, 95%CI 2.30-2.50 and RR = 1.90, 95%CI 1.71-2.11, respectively) were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with schizophrenia have a significantly high risk of mortality from breast, colon, and lung cancer.

Deciphering the paradoxical incidence of cancer in schizophrenia

OBJECTIVES:

The incidence of cancer in schizophrenia has been an area of controversy. The current article aims to provide a commentary outlining the contradictory findings of incidence of cancer in schizophrenia as well as discuss the available theories linking cancer with schizophrenia and address the methodological issues of the studies which could lead to the discrepant findings.

METHOD:

A literature search was carried out primarily using the electronic database of MEDLINE through PubMed using the search terms 'cancer' and 'schizophrenia'. Google Scholar was used to supplement the search.

RESULTS:

The findings were inconclusive, with studies documenting increased, decreased as well as no risk of cancer in patients with schizophrenia, compared with the general population. Several methodological limitations exist with regard to measures of assessment, sample size and selection bias.

CONCLUSIONS:

The association between cancer and schizophrenia remains controversial. Genetic as well as environmental theories exist explaining the paradoxical incidence of cancer in schizophrenia. The methodological factors could contribute to the discrepant findings.

Meta-analysis of the Correlation Between Schizophrenia and Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the correlation between schizophrenia and breast cancer (BC).

METHODS

We searched relevant articles indexed in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases; managed the data in Endnote X7 software; evaluated literature quality by Newcastle-Ottawa quality evaluation criteria; designed tables; and extracted relevant data. The main outcome measure was BC incidence. Effect values were risk ratio and 95% confidence intervals. We used Stata 13.1 software to perform the meta-analysis, choosing a corresponding combination model according to heterogeneity test results and carrying out subgroup analyses in order to better understand the stability of results through sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

On the basis of 15 studies that assessed patients in different geographic regions, meta-analysis results showed that BC incidence between the exposure group (patients with schizophrenia) and the control group (nonschizophrenia population or general population) had statistical difference (risk ratio = 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.05, 1.32), thus showing that BC incidence in patients with schizophrenia is higher than in the nonschizophrenia or general population. Subgroup analysis indicated that gender and geographic region may be sources of the assessed studies' heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of schizophrenia is positively correlated with BC, and the incidence of BC in patients with schizophrenia is increased to a certain degree. Because of the effects of potential and publication bias, this conclusion needs more high-quality studies to increase the strength of evidence.

Management of common adverse effects of antipsychotic medications

The benefits of antipsychotic medications are sometimes obscured by their adverse effects. These effects range from relatively minor tolerability issues (e.g., mild sedation or dry mouth) to very unpleasant (e.g., constipation, akathisia, sexual dysfunction) to painful (e.g., acute dystonias) to disfiguring (e.g., weight gain, tardive dyskinesia) to life-threatening (e.g., myocarditis, agranulocytosis). Importantly, adverse effect profiles are specific to each antipsychotic medication and do not neatly fit into first- and second-generation classifications. This paper reviews management strategies for the most frequent side effects and identifies common principles intended to optimize net antipsychotic benefits. Only use antipsychotics if the indication is clear; only continue antipsychotics if a benefit is discernible. If an antipsychotic is providing substantial benefit, and the adverse effect is not life-threatening, then the first management choice is to lower the dose or adjust the dosing schedule. The next option is to change the antipsychotic; this is often reasonable unless the risk of relapse is high. In some instances, behavioral interventions can be tried. Finally, concomitant medications, though generally not desirable, are necessary in many instances and can provide considerable relief. Among concomitant medication strategies, anticholinergic medications for dystonias and parkinsonism are often effective; beta-blockers and anticholinergic medications are useful for akathisia; and metformin may lead to slight to moderate weight loss. Anticholinergic drops applied sublingually reduce sialorrhea. Usual medications are effective for constipation or dyslipidemias. The clinical utility of recently approved treatments for tardive dyskinesia, valbenazine and deutetrabenazine, is unclear.

Genetic Evidence for the Association between Schizophrenia and Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the potential effect of schizophrenia on breast cancer risk in women, we performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study.

METHODS

The instrumental variables comprised 170 uncorrelated and non-pleiotropic single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that are significantly associated with schizophrenia risk in genome-wide association studies in 105,000 European descent individuals of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (http://www.med.unc.edu/pgc/) and the United Kingdom Clozapine Clinic. The association between these SNPs determined schizophrenia and breast cancer risk was estimated in approximately 229,000 European descent females from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium using the inverse-variance weighted and the weighted median MR methods.

RESULTS

We found that the genetically-predicted risk of schizophrenia was associated with increased breast cancer risk (under a random-effects model: odds ratio per 1 unit increase in log odds of schizophrenia = 1.04, 95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.06, p = 5.6 × 10-5). Similar significant associations were observed in analyses using a weighted median model and sensitivity analysis excluding six SNPs with genotype imputation score of less than 0.8, as well as analyses stratified by estrogen receptor status of breast cancer.

CONCLUSION

Our findings implicate a modest increased risk for breast cancer in genetically determined schizophrenic females.

Use of antipsychotics and risk of breast cancer: a Danish nationwide case-control study

AIMS

Some antipsychotics increase prolactin levels, which might increase the risk of breast cancer. Existing evidence is conflicting and based on sparse data, especially for the increasingly used second-generation antipsychotics. We conducted a nationwide case-control study of the association between antipsychotic use and incident breast cancer.

METHODS

From the Danish Cancer Registry, we identified women with a first-time diagnosis of breast cancer 2000-2015 (n = 60 360). For each case, we age-matched 10 female population controls. Using conditional logistic regression, we calculated odds ratios (ORs) for breast cancer associated with use of antipsychotics. We stratified antipsychotics by first- and second-generation status and by ability to induce elevation of prolactin.

RESULTS

In total, 4951 cases (8.1%) and 47 643 controls (7.9%) had ever used antipsychotics. Long-term use (≥10 000 mg olanzapine equivalents) was associated with breast cancer, with an adjusted OR of 1.18 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.06, 1.32]. A weak dose-response pattern was seen, with ORs increasing to 1.27 (95% CI 1.01, 1.59) for ≥50 000 mg olanzapine equivalents. Associations were similar for first- and second-generation antipsychotics (ORs 1.17 vs. 1.11), but also for nonprolactin inducing-antipsychotics (OR 1.17). Stratifying by oestrogen receptor status, positive associations were seen for oestrogen receptor-positive cancers (long-term use: OR 1.29; 95% CI 1.13, 1.47) while no associations were observed for oestrogen receptor-negative cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, our results do not suggest a clinically important association between antipsychotic use and risk of breast cancer. The importance of drug-induced prolactin elevation is unclear but may lead to a slightly increased risk of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Hyperprolactinemia-inducing antipsychotics increase breast cancer risk by activating JAK-STAT5 in precancerous lesions

BACKGROUND

Psychiatric medications are widely prescribed in the USA. Many antipsychotics cause serum hyperprolactinemia as an adverse side effect; prolactin-Janus kinase 2 (JAK2)-signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 (STAT5) signaling both induces cell differentiation and suppresses apoptosis. It is controversial whether these antipsychotics increase breast cancer risk.

METHODS

We investigated the impact of several antipsychotics on mammary tumorigenesis initiated by retrovirus-mediated delivery of either ErbB2 or HRas or by transgenic expression of Wnt-1.

RESULTS

We found that the two hyperprolactinemia-inducing antipsychotics, risperidone and pimozide, prompted precancerous lesions to progress to cancer while aripiprazole, which did not cause hyperprolactinemia, did not. We observed that risperidone and pimozide (but not aripiprazole) caused precancerous cells to activate STAT5 and suppress apoptosis while exerting no impact on proliferation. Importantly, we demonstrated that these effects of antipsychotics on early lesions required the STAT5 gene function. Furthermore, we showed that only two-week treatment of mice with ruxolitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor, blocked STAT5 activation, restored apoptosis, and prevented early lesion progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperprolactinemia-inducing antipsychotics instigate precancerous cells to progress to cancer via JAK/STAT5 to suppress the apoptosis anticancer barrier, and these cancer-promoting effects can be prevented by prophylactic anti-JAK/STAT5 treatment. This preclinical work exposes a potential breast cancer risk from hyperprolactinemia-inducing antipsychotics in certain patients and suggests a chemoprevention regime that is relatively easy to implement compared to the standard 5-year anti-estrogenic treatment in women who have or likely have already developed precancerous lesions while also requiring hyperprolactinemia-inducing antipsychotics.

Use of psychotropic medication in women with psychotic disorders at menopause and beyond

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Drugs have been extensively prescribed for the treatment of psychotic symptoms in schizophrenia and related disorders, as well as for the management of psychotic features in delirium, dementia and affective disorders. The aim of this narrative review is to focus on the recent literature on drug treatment in women with psychosis at the transition to menopause and subsequently.

RECENT FINDINGS

The recent literature emphasizes the following points: the efficacy of antipsychotic medication in psychosis is largely confined to the alleviation of delusions and hallucinations; menopause and ageing alter the kinetics and dynamics of drug action; drugs other than antipsychotics are currently being tested to address the cognitive, affective and negative symptoms of psychotic illnesses; menopausal symptoms add to comorbidities and require simultaneous treatment, raising the probability of deleterious drug interactions; antipsychotic drugs have many side effects and contribute to high mortality rates in the older psychosis population.

SUMMARY

A major implication for research is that antipsychotic drugs with a wider range of action and with fewer side effects are urgently needed. The clinical implications of the pharmacotherapy of psychotic illness are: older women's needs must be assessed through a comprehensive history and review of systems and physical and mental examination. To avoid adverse effects, drug dosages are best kept low and polypharmacy avoided wherever possible. It is important to frequently reassess older patients, as their pharmacotherapy requirements change with age and with comorbidity.

Pharmacotherapy for schizophrenia in postmenopausal women

INTRODUCTION

Reduced estrogen levels at menopause mean a loss of the neuroprotection that is conferred, from puberty until menopause, on women with schizophrenia. The postmenopausal stage of schizophrenia requires therapeutic attention because women with this diagnosis almost invariably experience increased symptoms and increased side effects at this time. So far, few targeted therapies have been successfully developed.

AREAS COVERED

This non-systematic, narrative review is based on the relevant published literature indexed in PubMed. A digital search was combined with a manual check of references from studies in the field of gender differences, menopause and schizophrenia. Aside from the inclusion of a few early classic papers, the review focuses on 21st century basic, psychopharmacologic, and clinical literature on the treatment of women with schizophrenia after menopause.

EXPERT OPINION

Beyond a relatively low dose threshold, all antipsychotic medications have adverse effects, which become more prominent for women at the time of menopause. Estrogen modulators may not help all symptoms of schizophrenia but are, nevertheless, relatively safe and, when used as adjuncts, help to keep antipsychotic doses low, thus reducing the side effect burden. The field is currently moving towards precision medicine and individual genetic profiles will help to determine the efficacy of available treatments in the future.

Down-regulation of microRNA-19b in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer

miR-19b (miR-19b-3p) has been reported to be correlated with either favorable or unfavorable events in several cancers. However, no study has been conducted to evaluate the expression level of miR-19b in patients with breast cancer (BC). This study was aimed to investigate the expression level of miR-19b in human malignant and healthy breast tissues with histopathology of ER+/PR+/HER2-. We performed a miRNA real-time PCR to detect differential expression of miR-19b in 40 BC, including 17 BC with familial background and 23 BC without familial background, and 12 non-tumoral tissues. Moreover, a bioinformatics prediction upon miR-19b functionality in BC cells was performed. The miR-19b expression level was significantly down-regulated in BC, BC with familial background, and BC without familial background compared with its expression in normal tissue (p value, <0.0001; fold change, -7.45; p value, 0.0003; fold change, -6.45; and p value, 0.0005; fold change, -8.41, respectively). Moreover, according to the AUCs (area under curve) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, miR-19b can significantly distinguish all defined categories. Last, in agreement with our experimental findings, proteoglycans in cancer, pathways in cancer, FoxO signaling pathway, central carbon metabolism in cancer, p53 signaling pathway, transcriptional misregulation in cancer, and prolactin signaling pathway were predicted as miR-19b-related signaling pathways. In summary, down-regulation of miR-19b in BC vs healthy tissue suggests that mir-19b can function as a tumor suppressor. Our results shed additional information on controversial expression pattern of miR-19b depending on different cancer types.

Association of Schizophrenia With the Risk of Breast Cancer Incidence: A Meta-analysis

Importance

Patients with schizophrenia are considered to have many risk factors for the development of cancer. However, the incidence of breast cancer in women with schizophrenia compared with the general population remains uncertain.

Objective

To perform an updated meta-analysis to evaluate the association between schizophrenia and the risk of breast cancer.

Data Sources

A systematic search of the PubMed and EMBASE databases was conducted using the search terms schizophrenia, schizophrenic, psychosis, combined with breast and cancer, tumor, neoplasm, or carcinoma. The final literature search was performed on August 15, 2017.

Study Selection

Cohort studies reporting the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) for the risk of breast cancer in women with schizophrenia compared with the general population.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

The meta-analysis adhered to Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Data extraction was performed independently. A random-effects model was used to pool the results, and a recently proposed prediction interval was calculated to describe the heterogeneity.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The SIR for the risk of breast cancer in women with schizophrenia compared with the general population or those without schizophrenia.

Results

Twelve cohorts including 125 760 women were included in this meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that schizophrenia was associated with a significantly increased risk of breast cancer incidence in women (SIR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.14-1.50; P < .001), with significant heterogeneity (P < .001; I2 = 89%). Substantial between-study variance was also suggested by the wide prediction interval (0.81-2.10), which indicated that it is possible that a future study will show a decreased breast cancer risk in women with schizophrenia compared with the general population. The subgroup analysis results showed that the association was not significantly affected by whether breast cancer cases were excluded at baseline or the sample size of the included studies.

Conclusions and Relevance

The incidence of breast cancer in women with schizophrenia is higher than that of the general female population. However, significant heterogeneity exists among the included studies. Women with schizophrenia deserve intensive prevention and treatment of breast cancer.

Uncoupling genotoxic stress responses from circadian control increases susceptibility to mammary carcinogenesis

We previously demonstrated that chemopreventive methylselenocysteine (MSC) prevents N-Nitroso-N-methylurea (NMU)-induced mammary carcinogenesis in the susceptible Fischer 344 (F344) rats by enhancing NAD+-dependent SIRT1 activity, restoring circadian expression of Period 2 (Per2) and circadian controlled genes. Here, we show that compared to the genetically resistant Copenhagen (COP) rat strain, mammary glands of the F344 rats have a 4-hour phase delay in circadian expression of Per2. Consequently, F344 rats failed to increase SIRT1 activity and circadian expression of Per2 and DDRR genes after exposure to NMU. Exposure of COP rats to NMU had the opposite effect, enhancing SIRT1 activity, increasing circadian expression of Per2 and DDRR genes. Significantly, SIRT1 activity and circadian expression of Per2 and DDRR genes in NMU-treated F344 rats on a chemopreventive regimen of MSC approximated those in NMU-treated COP rats. These results indicated that COP rats have an increased capacity to maintain NAD+-dependent SIRT1 activity under genotoxic stress. This contention was supported by increased stability of the period and phase of circadian locomotor activity in COP vs F344 rats exposed to changing light conditions. The increased sensitivity and rapid response of COP to changing light were correlated with the enhanced circadian response of this strain to carcinogen. Disturbance of circadian rhythm by jet lag also disrupted circadian expression of Per2 and DDRR genes, and accelerated mammary tumorigenesis in rodent models. These results suggested that uncoupling of DDRR responses from circadian control by environmental stresses and endogenous factors increases susceptibility to mammary carcinogenesis, possibly by inducing a promutagenic state.

Management of antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinaemia

Hyperprolactinaemia is a common endocrine disorder that can be associated with significant morbidity. Antipsychotic medications are frequently linked to hyperprolactinaemia. This disorder usually presents as menstrual problems in women and sexual problems in men, which affect the patients' quality of life and adherence to antipsychotic treatment. In the past, treatment for hyperprolactinaemia was recommended only for symptomatic patients. However, it has become clear that persistent asymptomatic hyperprolactinaemia can be associated with long-term physical morbidities such as osteoporosis and possibly breast cancer. Hence, it is imperative that hyperprolactinaemia is managed even if asymptomatic when initially detected. This article discusses the various management options, such as reducing the dose of antipsychotic medication, switching to a prolactin-sparing antipsychotic and adding aripiprazole to the treatment regimen.

Learning Objectives

• Understand the physiology of the prolactin hormone

• Be able to judge when to intervene if a patient on an antipsychotic medication presents with hyperprolactinaemia

• Learn about the different treatment options

Hyperprolactinaemia in first episode psychosis - A longitudinal assessment

Little is known about hyperprolactinaemia (HPL) in first episode psychosis (FEP) patients. We investigated longitudinal changes in serum prolactin in FEP, and the relationship between HPL, and antipsychotic medication and stress. Serum prolactin was recorded in FEP patients at recruitment and again, 3 and 12months later. HPL was defined as a serum prolactin level >410mIU/L (~19.3ng/ml) for males, and a serum prolactin level >510mIU/L (~24.1ng/ml) for females. From a total of 174 people with serum prolactin measurements at study recruitment, 43% (n=74) had HPL, whilst 27% (n=21/78) and 27% (n=26/95) had HPL at 3 and 12months respectively. We observed higher serum prolactin levels in females versus males (p<0.001), and in antipsychotic treated (n=68) versus antipsychotic naïve patients (p<0.0001). Prolactin levels were consistently raised in FEP patients taking risperidone, amisulpride and FGAs compared to other antipsychotics. No significant relationship was observed between perceived stress scores (β=7.13, t=0.21, df=11, p=0.0.84 95% CI -72.91-87.16), or objective life stressors (β=-21.74, t=-0.31, df=8, p=0.77 95% CI -218.57-175.09) and serum prolactin. Our study found elevated rates of HPL over the course of the first 12months of illness. We found no evidence to support the notion that stress is related to elevated serum prolactin at the onset of psychosis.