Impact of fentanyl use on initiation and discontinuation of methadone and buprenorphine/naloxone among people with prescription-type opioid use disorder: secondary analysis of a Canadian treatment trial

Illicit Fentanyl in the Prenatal Period: A Significant Emerging Risk for Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of in-utero illicit fentanyl exposure on neonatal outcomes, including neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS), length of stay (LOS), and treatment requirements.This study was conducted from March 2020 to December 2022, and focused on neonates born to mothers with opioid use or opioid use disorder (OUD). Maternal opioid use was identified through self-report or umbilical cord tissue (UCT) testing. Severe NOWS was defined as cases requiring pharmacological treatment. Statistical analyses included univariate comparisons, logistic regression, and generalized linear models to assess the associations between fentanyl exposure and neonatal outcomes.Forty-seven percent (75/159) of infants had in-utero fentanyl exposure. Fentanyl-positive mothers were older, 31 ± 5 years, compared to non-fentanyl mothers, 29 ± 5, p = 0.01. They were also less likely to receive prenatal care (p < 0.01) and had a higher number of polysubstance used, 5 ± 1 compared to non-fentanyl mothers, 3 ± 1, p < 0.01. Overall, infants exposed to fentanyl had a higher incidence of severe NOWS (odds ratio = 5.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.49-12.95, p < 0.01) and required earlier NOWS treatment initiation, 1 ± 1 day compared to non-exposed infants 3 ± 2 days, p < 0.01. In adjusted analysis, fentanyl exposure was associated with a nearly three-fold increased risk of NOWS (Mantel-Haenszel combined relative risk = 2.98, 95% CI: 1.94-4.57). Furthermore, fentanyl exposure led to longer LOS, with a 40% increase for preterm neonates (p < 0.01) and a 63% increase for full-term neonates (p < 0.01). Additionally, there was a significant correlation between log fentanyl concentration in umbilical cord tissue and cumulative morphine dose required for NOWS treatment, p = 0.001.Prenatal illicit fentanyl exposure is an independent and strong risk factor for severe NOWS presentation in newborns requiring extended hospital stays. · Illicit fentanyl is increasingly recognized as a major driver of opioid-related substance use disorders during pregnancy, often occurring alongside polysubstance use.. · Significant prenatal exposure to opioids is a well-established risk factor for neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome. The recent rise in illicit fentanyl use has heightened these concerns.. · Both preterm and term infants are at risk for severe withdrawal symptoms following prenatal exposure to illicit fentanyl..

A cross-sectional study of differences in medication for opioid use disorder receipt among pregnant people enrolled in Medicaid in Oregon, United States

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Medication is the gold standard to support a healthy pregnancy for pregnant people with opioid use disorder (OUD). This study measured inequities and differences in OUD medication treatment among pregnant people in Oregon, USA.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND MEASUREMENTS

Our study population consisted of Medicaid enrollees across the US state of Oregon who had at least one live hospital birth between 2012 and 2020 and one diagnosis of OUD prenatally (n = 4363). We measured differences in demographic characteristics (age, race, ethnicity, location) among those with and without medication for OUD in the prenatal through 3-months postpartum period (any medication use, and by type), and compared exclusive methadone versus buprenorphine receipt. We report unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios.

FINDINGS

Adjusted odds ratios for medication for OUD were lower among American Indian/Alaska Native pregnant people compared with White pregnant people [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.42, 0.83)], younger pregnant people compared with those aged 30-34 years [aOR, ages 15-19: 0.1 (95 CI = 0.06, 0.18); aOR, ages 20-24: 0.58 (95 CI = 0.49, 0.69)] and rural pregnant people compared with those in urban communities [aOR 0.58 (95 CI = 0.5-0.67)]. Rural pregnant people with OUD also had lower odds of methadone receipt [aOR 0.23 (95 CI = 0.17, 0.3)] and higher odds of buprenorphine receipt [aOR 3.99 (95 CI = 2.97, 5.35)] than other people in this study. Among those who received medication, Black pregnant people had increased odds of receiving methadone compared with buprenorphine [aOR 2.09 (95 CI = 1.1-3.97)].

CONCLUSIONS

In Oregon, USA, inequities in receipt of any medication for opioid use disorder were observed among pregnant people who identified as American Indian or Alaska Native, younger than 25, and living in rural communities. Black pregnant people in Oregon, USA, were more likely to receive methadone than buprenorphine.

Initiation and Dosing of Extended-Release Buprenorphine: A Narrative Review of Emerging Approaches for Patients Who Use Fentanyl

Individuals with Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) who use fentanyl are at high risk of mortality due to opioid-related overdose. While buprenorphine extended-release (BUP-XR) may reduce this risk, there is a need to optimize clinical practice with BUP-XR to overcome barriers to treatment initiation and retention in patients who use fentanyl. Through a narrative review of evidence from peer-reviewed publications and conference abstracts, this article provides an overview of current novel initiation and dosing strategies for BUP-XR in patient populations with confirmed or presumed use of fentanyl. Evidence in this area is rapidly emerging with multiple studies describing BUP-XR initiation prior to 7-day stabilization on transmucosal buprenorphine (TM-BUP). Results from a randomized controlled study indicate that initiating BUP-XR following a single TM-BUP dose is noninferior to standard initiation in terms of treatment retention at injection 2, with similar rates of precipitated withdrawal and adverse events, and this protocol is now included in the approved prescribing information in the USA. While additional "macro/high-dose" or "micro/low-dose" and "direct dose" induction approaches have also been reported, evidence for these is limited to small uncontrolled studies or case reports. Consistent with evidence from studies of TM-BUP, which suggests individuals who use fentanyl may require higher maintenance doses in order to be retained in treatment, administrative and observational data suggests that use of the 300-mg maintenance dose, shortened intervals between doses, and supplemental TM-BUP may be feasible approaches to increase buprenorphine exposure in patients with ongoing symptoms and improve retention. Evidence in this area is rapidly evolving, and many of these strategies are increasingly being adopted clinically and incorporated into clinical guidelines. Further research should incorporate increased sample sizes, broader and more consistent outcome measurement, and increased duration of follow-up to facilitate more robust evaluation of efficacy and safety as well as increase comparability between studies.

Adapting to the Fentanyl Epidemic: Rapid Qualitative Observations and Derived Clinical and Research Implications from the Emergency Department Longitudinal Integrated Care (ED-LINC) Randomized Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVE

The Emergency Department Longitudinal Integrated Care (ED-LINC) randomized clinical trial (NCT05327166) tests a Collaborative Care-informed intervention for emergency department (ED) patients with opioid use disorder. The ED-LINC intervention was developed before the current fentanyl epidemic; less than 10% of ED-LINC pilot intervention patients reported fentanyl use. To understand fentanyl's impact on the ED-LINC protocol, we utilized a systematic rapid qualitative approach to document clinical observations related to ED-LINC patients' fentanyl use and subsequent protocol modifications.

METHOD

This study utilized Rapid Assessment Procedure Informed Clinical Ethnography (RAPICE) methods to document fentanyl-related clinical observations. As participant observers, the team worked with a mixed methods consultant to analyze observations, informing adaptation to study protocol and intervention.

RESULTS

From 4/12/2022 to 2/10/2023, 86 patients enrolled in the ED-LINC trial. Forty received the ED-LINC intervention and are included in this study. Investigators identified the following themes informing adaptation to the ED-LINC intervention: 1) fentanyl-related suicide risk, 2) fentanyl-catalyzed approach to Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD), 3) fentanyl-related adaptations to measurement-based care embedded in the Collaborative Care approach, 4) fentanyl-associated survival needs, and 5) engagement challenges with fentanyl. Adaptations included incorporating overdose prevention into suicide risk assessment, nontraditional MOUD induction, and shifting to a component-driven model.

CONCLUSIONS

The landscape of clinical practice can change quickly and may require both researchers and healthcare providers to quickly pivot. Rapid assessment procedures integrated into clinical trial investigation allow for modifications and adaptations to study protocols to ensure salient and generalizable results given the rapidly evolving opioid epidemic.

A Drd1-cre mouse line with nucleus accumbens gene dysregulation exhibits blunted fentanyl seeking

The synthetic opioid fentanyl remains abundant in the illicit drug supply, contributing to tens of thousands of overdose deaths every year. Despite this, the neurobiological effects of fentanyl use remain largely understudied. The nucleus accumbens (NAc) is a central locus promoting persistent drug use and relapse, largely dependent on activity of dopamine D1 receptors. NAc D1 receptor-expressing medium spiny neurons (D1-MSNs) undergo molecular and physiological adaptations that contribute to negative affect during fentanyl abstinence, but whether these neuroadaptations also promote fentanyl relapse is unclear. Here, we obtained Drd1-cre 120Mxu mice to investigate D1-dependent mechanisms of fentanyl relapse. We serendipitously discovered this mouse line is resistant to fentanyl seeking, despite similar intravenous fentanyl self-administration, and greater fentanyl-induced locomotion, compared to wildtype counterparts. In drug naïve mice, we found Drd1-cre 120Mxu mice have elevated D1 receptor expression in NAc, alongside increased expression of MSN marker genes Chrm4 and Penk . We show Drd1-cre 120Mxu mice have increased sensitivity to the D1 receptor agonist SKF-38393, and exhibit divergent expression of MSN markers, opioid receptors, glutamate receptor subunits, and TrkB after fentanyl self-administration that may underly blunted fentanyl seeking. Finally, we show fentanyl-related behavior is unaltered by chemogenetic manipulation of D1-MSNs in Drd1-cre 120Mxu mice. Conversely, chemogenetic stimulation of putative D1-MSNs in wildtype mice recapitulated the blunted fentanyl seeking of Drd1-cre 120Mxu mice, supporting a role for aberrant D1-MSN signaling in this behavior. Together, our data uncover alterations in NAc gene expression and function with implications for susceptibility and resistance to developing fentanyl use disorder.

Qualitative findings from North America's first drug compassion club

In Canada, the ongoing fatal overdose crisis remains driven by the unpredictable potency and content of the illicit drug supply. From August 2022 until October 2023, the Drug User Liberation Front [DULF] operated a drug compassion club [CC], which sells drugs of known composition and purity without medical oversight. The present study is a qualitative evaluation of this project. From December 2022 to February 2023, we interviewed 16 CC members about their experiences with DULF's CC. Using a semi-structured interview guide, participants were interviewed in a private space to ensure confidentiality. Thematic analysis was used to code for a priori and unexpected themes. Participants spoke positively of their experiences with the CC, which ranged from lower overdose risk, health improvements, preference for the drug purchasing process, and mutual respect and trust among CC members, founders, and staff. No participants reported overdosing on CC-sourced drugs, and drugs were described as safe and reliable. For opioid users, the tolerance developed for opioid-potent fentanyl hampered the transition to CC heroin. Suggestions for CC improvements were also identified. Despite political backlash to the project, the CC appears to be a novel and promising approach to reducing overdose morbidity in high needs communities. By promoting participant autonomy, regulating an unstable drug supply, and creating community, this intervention has reduced self-reported overdose risk and improved the health and social wellbeing of members. No overdoses reported from CC-sourced drugs suggests that authorizing, expanding and continually evaluating the CC model is warranted.

Pharmacological Strategies to Decrease Long-Term Prescription Opioid Use: A Systematic Review

Background/Objectives: As long-term prescription opioid use is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, timely dose reduction of prescription opioids should be considered. However, most research has been conducted on patients using heroin. Given the differences between prescription and illicit opioid use, the aim of this review was to provide an overview of pharmacological strategies to reduce prescription opioid use or improve clinical outcomes for people who experience long-term prescription opioid use, including those with opioid use disorder. Methods: We conducted a systematic database search of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library. Outcomes included dose reduction, treatment dropout, pain, addiction, and outcomes relating to quality of life (depression, functioning, quality of life). Results: We identified thirteen studies (eight randomized controlled trials and five observational studies). Pharmacological strategies were categorized into two categories: (1) deprescribing (tapering) opioids or (2) opioid agonist treatment (OAT) with long-acting opioids. Tapering strategies decreased opioid dosage and had mixed effects on pain and addiction. OAT with buprenorphine or methadone led to improvements in pain relief and quality of life, with a slight (non-significant) preference for methadone in terms of treatment retention (RR = 1.10 [CI: 0.89-1.37]) but not for other outcomes. Most studies had high dropout rates and a serious risk of bias. Conclusions: Tapering reduced prescription opioid doses had mixed effects on pain. OAT improved clinical outcomes without dose reduction. Based on our review findings, there is no clear preference for either tapering or OAT. Tapering may be considered first as it reduces dependency, tolerance, and side effects, but is associated with adverse events and not always feasible. OAT can be a suitable alternative. Non-pharmacological interventions may facilitate tapering. Further research is needed to identify novel pharmacological strategies to facilitate opioid tapering. Registration: PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022323468.

Impact of baseline methamphetamine/amphetamine use on discontinuation of methadone and buprenorphine/naloxone among people with prescription-type opioid use disorder in Canada

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Although concurrent stimulant use is common among people with opioid use disorder (OUD), there is little evidence on its impacts on opioid agonist therapy (OAT) outcomes. This study sought to determine the impact of baseline methamphetamine/amphetamine use on discontinuation of OAT among individuals with prescription-type OUD (POUD) initiating methadone or buprenorphine/naloxone as part of a pragmatic randomized trial in Canada.

METHODS

Secondary analysis of a pan-Canadian pragmatic trial conducted between 2017 and 2020 comparing supervised methadone versus flexible take-home dosing buprenorphine/naloxone models of care. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the effect of baseline methamphetamine/amphetamine use (measured by urine drug test [UDT]) on two discontinuation outcomes (i.e., assigned OAT discontinuation, any OAT discontinuation).

RESULTS

Two hundred nine (n = 209) participants initiated OAT, of which 96 (45.9%) had positive baseline methamphetamine/amphetamine UDT. Baseline methamphetamine/amphetamine use was associated with shorter median times in assigned OAT (21 vs. 168 days, hazard ratio [aHR] = 2.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.60-3.76) and any OAT (25 days vs. 168 days, aHR = 2.06, CI = 1.32-3.24). No interaction between methamphetamine/amphetamine and assigned OAT was observed for either outcome (p > .05).

CONCLUSION AND SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE

This study offers novel insights on the impact of methamphetamine/amphetamine use on OAT outcomes among people with POUD. Methamphetamine/amphetamine use was common and was associated with increased risk of OAT discontinuation. Supplementary interventions, including treatment for stimulant use, are needed to improve retention in OAT and optimize treatment outcomes in this population.

The Impact of High-Potency Synthetic Opioids on Pharmacotherapies for Opioid Use Disorder: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

The clinical implications of high potency synthetic opioids (HPSO) on medications for opioid use disorder (MOUDs) are not well understood. Although pharmacological interactions are plausible, the clinical significance of such interaction has not been systematically elucidated. This scoping review investigates the relationship between HPSO exposure and various MOUD treatment outcomes.

METHODS

We followed PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) for scoping reviews with extensive a priori search strategy of databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane.

RESULTS

From 9149 studies, 34 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Synthesized data reveal several critical insights: First, there is a variable but high occurrence (38%-80%) of HPSO usage among individuals with MOUDs. Second, MOUDs are linked to a decreased risk of overdoses and deaths associated with HPSO. Third, HPSO consumption is correlated with the risk of precipitated withdrawal when starting buprenorphine. Fourth, low-dose buprenorphine is being recognized as one method to avoid moderate withdrawal symptoms prior to treatment. Lastly, significant gaps exist in human experimental data concerning the effects of HPSO on key factors critical for treating OUD-craving, withdrawal symptoms, and pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence supports MOUD safety and effectiveness in reducing nonmedical opioid use. Further research is needed to explore HPSO's influence on the acute factors preceding nonmedical opioid use, such as cravings, withdrawal symptoms, and pain. This research could inform the optimization of MOUD dosing strategies. Achieving consensus and harmonizing data across clinical and research protocols could diminish variability, enhancing our understanding of HPSOs effect on MOUD treatment outcomes.

Reconsidering the usefulness of long-term high-dose buprenorphine

Buprenorphine has been successfully used for decades in the treatment of opioid use disorder, yet there are complexities to its use that warrant attention to maximize its utility. While the package insert of the combination product buprenorphine\naloxone continues to recommend a maximum dose of 16 mg daily for maintenance, the emergence of fentanyl and synthetic analogs in the current drug supply may be limiting the effectiveness of this standard dose. Many practitioners have embraced and appropriately implemented novel practices to mitigate the sequelae of our current crisis. It has become common clinical practice to stabilize patients with 24 - 32 mg of buprenorphine daily at treatment initiation. Many of these patients, however, are maintained on these high doses (>16 mg/d) indefinitely, even after prolonged stability. Although this may be a necessary strategy in the short term, there is little evidence to support its safety and efficacy, and these high doses may be exposing patients to more complications and side effects than standard doses. Commonly known side effects of buprenorphine that are likely dose-related include hyperhidrosis, sedation, decreased libido, constipation, and hypogonadism. There are also complications related to the active metabolite of buprenorphine (norbuprenorphine) which is a full agonist at the mu opioid receptor and does not have a ceiling on respiratory suppression. Such side effects can lead to medical morbidity as well as decreased medication adherence, and we, therefore, recommend that after a period of stabilization, practitioners consider a trial of decreasing the dose of buprenorphine toward standard dose recommendations. Some patients' path of recovery may never reach this stabilization phase (i.e., several months of adherence to medications, opioid abstinence, and other clinical indicators of stability). Side effects of buprenorphine may not have much salience when patients are struggling for survival and safety, but for those who are fortunate enough to advance in their recovery, the side effects become more problematic and can limit quality of life and adherence.

Managing Opioid Withdrawal Symptoms During the Fentanyl Crisis: A Review

Illicitly manufactured fentanyl (IMF) is a significant contributor to the increasing rates of overdose-related deaths. Its high potency and lipophilicity can complicate opioid withdrawal syndromes (OWS) and the subsequent management of opioid use disorder (OUD). This scoping review aimed to collate the current OWS management of study populations seeking treatment for OWS and/or OUD directly from an unregulated opioid supply, such as IMF. Therefore, the focus was on therapeutic interventions published between January 2010 and November 2023, overlapping with the period of increasing IMF exposure. A health science librarian conducted a systematic search on November 13, 2023. A total of 426 studies were screened, and 173 studies were reviewed at the full-text level. Forty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Buprenorphine and naltrexone were included in most studies with the goal of transitioning to a long-acting injectable version. Various augmenting agents were tested (buspirone, memantine, suvorexant, gabapentin, and pregabalin); however, the liberal use of adjunctive medication and shortened timelines to initiation had the most consistently positive results. Outside of FDA-approved medications for OUD, lofexidine, gabapentin, and suvorexant have limited evidence for augmenting opioid agonist initiation. Trials often have low retention rates, particularly when opioid agonist washout is required. Neurostimulation strategies were promising; however, they were developed and studied early. Precipitated withdrawal is a concern; however, the rates were low and adequately mitigated or managed with low- or high-dose buprenorphine induction. Maintenance treatment continues to be superior to detoxification without continued management. Shorter induction protocols allow patients to initiate evidence-based treatment more quickly, reducing the use of illicit or non-prescribed substances.

The Association Between Self-Reported Anxiety and Retention in Opioid Agonist Therapy: Findings From a Canadian Pragmatic Trial

BACKGROUND

Prescription-type opioid use disorder (POUD) is often accompanied by comorbid anxiety, yet the impact of anxiety on retention in opioid agonist therapy (OAT) is unclear. Therefore, this study investigated whether baseline anxiety severity affects retention in OAT and whether this effect differs by OAT type (methadone maintenance therapy (MMT) vs. buprenorphine/naloxone (BNX)).

METHODS

This secondary analysis used data from a pan-Canadian randomized trial comparing flexible take-home dosing BNX and standard supervised MMT for 24 weeks. The study included 268 adults with POUD. Baseline anxiety was assessed using the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), with BAI ≥ 16 indicating moderate-to-severe anxiety. The primary outcomes were retention in assigned and any OAT at week 24. In addition, the impact of anxiety severity on retention was examined, and assigned OAT was considered an effect modifier.

RESULTS

Of the participants, 176 (65%) reported moderate-to-severe baseline anxiety. In adjusted analyses, there was no significant difference in retention between those with BAI ≥ 16 and those with BAI < 16 assigned (29% vs. 28%; odds ratio (OR) = 2.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.94-4.40; P = 0.07) or any OAT (35% vs. 34%; OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 0.77-3.21; P = 0.21). In addition, there was no significant effect modification by OAT type for retention in assigned (P = 0.41) or any OAT (P = 0.71). In adjusted analyses, greater retention in treatment was associated with BNX (vs. MMT), male gender identity (vs. female, transgender, or other), enrolment in the Quebec study site (vs. other sites), and absence of a positive urine drug screen for stimulants at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline anxiety severity did not significantly impact retention in OAT for adults with POUD, and there was no significant effect modification by OAT type. However, the overall retention rates were low, highlighting the need to develop new strategies to minimize the risk of attrition from treatment.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03033732).

Correlates of nonfatal overdose among treatment-seeking individuals with non-heroin opioid use disorder: Findings from a pragmatic, pan-Canadian, randomized control trial

INTRODUCTION

Misuse of prescription and synthetic opioids is a primary contributor to the escalating overdose crisis in North America. However, factors associated with nonfatal overdose (NFO) in this context are poorly understood. We examined individual and socio-structural level correlates of NFO among treatment-seeking adults with an opioid use disorder (OUD) not attributed to heroin (nonheroin opioid use disorder [NH-OUD]).

METHODS

The study drew data from OPTIMA, a pan-Canadian, multicenter, pragmatic, two-arm randomized control trial comparing supervised methadone and flexible take-home dosing buprenorphine/naloxone models of care among adults with NH-OUD conducted between 2017 and 2020. We used bivariable and multivariable logistic regression to determine factors associated with a lifetime history of NFO among participants enrolled in the trial.

RESULTS

Of 267 included participants, 154 (58%) reported a NFO in their lifetime, of whom 83 (55 %) had an NFO in the last 6 months. In multivariable analyses, positive urine drug test (UDT) for methamphetamine/amphetamine (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] = 2.59; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.17-5.80), positive UDT for fentanyl (AOR = 2.31; 95 % CI: 1.01-5.30), receiving income assistance (AOR = 2.17; 95 % CI: 1.18-4.09) and homelessness (AOR = 2.40; 95 % CI: 1.25-4.68) were positively associated with a lifetime history of NFO.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a high prevalence of NFO history in treatment-seeking adults with NH-OUD, particularly among participants with certain drug use patterns and markers of socio-structural marginalization at the time of enrollment. Given the known impact of prior NFO on future harms, these findings highlight the need for comprehensive care approaches that address polysubstance use and social determinants of health to mitigate future overdose risk.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2022

This paper is the forty-fifth consecutive installment of the annual anthological review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system, summarizing articles published during 2022 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides and receptors as well as effects of opioid/opiate agonists and antagonists. The review is subdivided into the following specific topics: molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors (1), the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia in animals (2) and humans (3), opioid-sensitive and opioid-insensitive effects of nonopioid analgesics (4), opioid peptide and receptor involvement in tolerance and dependence (5), stress and social status (6), learning and memory (7), eating and drinking (8), drug abuse and alcohol (9), sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (10), mental illness and mood (11), seizures and neurologic disorders (12), electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (13), general activity and locomotion (14), gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (15), cardiovascular responses (16), respiration and thermoregulation (17), and immunological responses (18).

Antecedents of fatal overdose in an adult cohort identified through administrative record linkage in Indiana, 2015-2022

BACKGROUND

The United States continues to experience unprecedented rates of overdose mortality and need to identify effective policies or practices that can be implemented. This study aims to measure the prevalence, frequency, timing, and rate of touchpoints that occurred prior to a fatal overdose where communities might intervene.

METHODS

In collaboration with Indiana state government, we conducted record-linkage of statewide administrative datasets to vital records (January 1, 2015, through August 26, 2022) to identify touchpoints (jail booking, prison release, prescription medication dispensation, emergency department visits, and emergency medical services). We examined touchpoints within 12-months prior to a fatal overdose among an adult cohort and explored variation over time and by demographic characteristics.

RESULTS

Over the 92-month study period there were 13,882 overdose deaths (89.3% accidental poisonings, X40-X44) in our adult cohort that were record-linked to multiple administrative datasets and revealed nearly two-thirds (64.7%; n=8980) experienced an emergency department visit, the most prevalent touchpoint followed by prescription medication dispensation, emergency medical services responses, jail booking, and prison release. However, with approximately 1 out of every 100 returning citizens dying from drug overdose within 12-months of release, prison release had the highest touchpoint rate followed by emergency medical services responses, jail booking, emergency department visits, and prescription medication dispensation.

CONCLUSION

Record-linking administrative data from routine practice to vital records from overdose mortality is a viable means of identifying where resources should be situated to reduce fatal overdose, with potential to evaluate the effectiveness of overdose prevention efforts.

Differential effect of cannabis use on opioid agonist treatment outcomes: Exploratory analyses from the OPTIMA study

INTRODUCTION

Conflictual evidence exists regarding the effects of cannabis use on the outcomes of opioid agonist therapy (OAT). In this exploratory analysis, we examined the effect of recent cannabis use on opioid use, craving, and withdrawal symptoms, in individuals participating in a trial comparing flexible buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP/NX) take-home dosing model to witnessed ingestion of methadone.

METHODS

We analyzed data from a multi-centric, pragmatic, 24-week, open label, randomized controlled trial in individuals with prescription-type opioid use disorder (n = 272), randomly assigned to BUP/NX (n = 138) or methadone (n = 134). The study measured last week cannabis and opioid use via timeline-follow back, recorded at baseline and every two weeks during the study. Craving symptoms were measured using the Brief Substance Craving Scale at baseline, and weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18 and 22. The study measured opioid withdrawal symptoms via Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale at treatment initiation and weeks 2, 4, and 6.

RESULTS

The mean maximum dose taken during the study was 17.3 mg/day (range = 0.5-32 mg/day) for BUP/NX group and 67.7 mg/day (range = 10-170 mg/day) in the methadone group. Repeated measures generalized linear mixed models demonstrated that cannabis use in the last week (mean of 2.3 days) was not significantly associated with last week opioid use (aβ ± standard error (SE) = -0.06 ± 0.04; p = 0.15), craving (aβ ± SE = -0.05 ± 0.08, p = 0.49), or withdrawal symptoms (aβ ± SE = 0.09 ± 0.1, p = 0.36). Bayes factor (BF) for each of the tested models supported the null hypothesis (BF < 0.3).

CONCLUSIONS

The current study did not demonstrate a statistically significant effect of cannabis use on outcomes of interest in the context of a pragmatic randomized-controlled trial. These findings replicated previous results reporting no effect of cannabis use on opioid-related outcomes.