1
|
Xu X, Jian Y, Huang L, Luo W, Wu B, Feng S, Zhou C, Zhang L. Characterization of avian β-defensin genes in Galliformes reveals widespread evolutionary diversification and distinct evolutionary relationships with infection risk. BMC Genomics 2025; 26:211. [PMID: 40033205 PMCID: PMC11874394 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-025-11390-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2025] [Indexed: 03/05/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Avian β-defensins (AvBDs) represent a key family of antimicrobial host defense peptides in birds. Accumulating evidence suggests that the evolutionary trajectory of β-defensin genes is specific to the gene, timescale, and species involved, implying that species-specific ecological and life-history differences drive divergent selective pressures on these genes. However, their evolutionary dynamics, particularly the interactions with ecological factors and life-history traits, remain insufficiently explored. RESULTS Through a comprehensive survey of 25 species spanning all major clades of Galliformes, 354 AvBD genes were identified. Comparative sequence analysis, genomic organization, and phylogenetic studies collectively reveal significant evolutionary diversification characterized by gene duplication, pseudogenization, and gene loss across these species. Notably, chicken AvBD3 exhibits significant differences in its coding regions, while AvBD6 and AvBD7 appear to have copy number variations, with species-specific paralogs of AvBD6 being especially prominent. Moreover, positive selection was more frequently observed in recently diverged gene lineages compared to ancestral ones. Using 70 samples from eight galliform species, the study further identified the prevalence of species-specific amino acid alleles. Phylogenetic comparative analysis demonstrated that the evolution of nine AvBD genes (AvBD2, -4, -5, -8, -9, -10, -11, -12, and -14) is significantly associated with specific ecological factors and life-history characteristics. Additionally, the evolutionary rates of these genes showed distinct relationship with inferred infection risk, likely reflecting the multifunctionality of β-defensins and potential trade-offs between immune defense and other biological functions. CONCLUSIONS This cross-species identification and systematic evolutionary analysis of AvBDs in Galliformes deepen our understanding of the co-evolution of host defense peptides, offering valuable insights into their natural biology and evolution, and paving the way for future applications as alternatives to traditional antibiotics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoqin Xu
- Key Laboratory of Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conservation, Ministry of Education, China West Normal University, Nanchong, 637000, P. R. China
- Sichuan Wildlife Rehabilitation and Breeding Research Center, China West Normal University, Nanchong, 637009, P. R. China
- Institute of Ecology, China West Normal University, Nanchong, 637009, P. R. China
| | - Yi Jian
- Key Laboratory of Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conservation, Ministry of Education, China West Normal University, Nanchong, 637000, P. R. China
- Sichuan Wildlife Rehabilitation and Breeding Research Center, China West Normal University, Nanchong, 637009, P. R. China
- College of Life Science, China West Normal University, Nanchong, 637000, P. R. China
| | - Lijing Huang
- Key Laboratory of Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conservation, Ministry of Education, China West Normal University, Nanchong, 637000, P. R. China
- Sichuan Wildlife Rehabilitation and Breeding Research Center, China West Normal University, Nanchong, 637009, P. R. China
- College of Life Science, China West Normal University, Nanchong, 637000, P. R. China
| | - Wei Luo
- Key Laboratory of Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conservation, Ministry of Education, China West Normal University, Nanchong, 637000, P. R. China
- Sichuan Wildlife Rehabilitation and Breeding Research Center, China West Normal University, Nanchong, 637009, P. R. China
- College of Life Science, China West Normal University, Nanchong, 637000, P. R. China
| | - Bangyuan Wu
- Key Laboratory of Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conservation, Ministry of Education, China West Normal University, Nanchong, 637000, P. R. China
- Sichuan Wildlife Rehabilitation and Breeding Research Center, China West Normal University, Nanchong, 637009, P. R. China
- College of Life Science, China West Normal University, Nanchong, 637000, P. R. China
| | - Shaohua Feng
- Key Laboratory of Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conservation, Ministry of Education, China West Normal University, Nanchong, 637000, P. R. China
- Sichuan Wildlife Rehabilitation and Breeding Research Center, China West Normal University, Nanchong, 637009, P. R. China
- College of Life Science, China West Normal University, Nanchong, 637000, P. R. China
| | - Caiquan Zhou
- Key Laboratory of Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conservation, Ministry of Education, China West Normal University, Nanchong, 637000, P. R. China
- Sichuan Wildlife Rehabilitation and Breeding Research Center, China West Normal University, Nanchong, 637009, P. R. China
- Institute of Ecology, China West Normal University, Nanchong, 637009, P. R. China
| | - Long Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conservation, Ministry of Education, China West Normal University, Nanchong, 637000, P. R. China.
- Sichuan Wildlife Rehabilitation and Breeding Research Center, China West Normal University, Nanchong, 637009, P. R. China.
- Institute of Ecology, China West Normal University, Nanchong, 637009, P. R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dementieva NV, Shcherbakov YS, Tyshchenko VI, Terletsky VP, Vakhrameev AB, Nikolaeva OA, Ryabova AE, Azovtseva AI, Mitrofanova OV, Peglivanyan GK, Reinbah NR, Griffin DK, Romanov MN. Comparative Analysis of Molecular RFLP and SNP Markers in Assessing and Understanding the Genetic Diversity of Various Chicken Breeds. Genes (Basel) 2022; 13:genes13101876. [PMID: 36292761 PMCID: PMC9601448 DOI: 10.3390/genes13101876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Monitoring the genetic diversity of small populations is important with respect to conserving rare and valuable chicken breeds, as well as discovery and innovation in germplasm research and application. Restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs), the molecular markers that underlie multilocus DNA fingerprinting (MLDF), have historically been employed for this purpose, but over the past two decades, there has been an irreversible shift toward high-throughput single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). In this study, we conducted a comparative analysis of archived MLDF results and new data from whole-genome SNP genotyping (SNPg) among 18 divergently selected breeds representing a large sample of the world gene pool. As a result, we obtained data that fit the general concept of the phylogenetic distribution of the studied breeds and compared them with RFLP and SNP markers. RFLPs were found to be useful markers for retrospective assessment of changes in the genetic architecture and variability underlying the phenotypic variation in chicken populations, especially when samples from previous generations used for MLDF are unavailable for SNPg. These results can facilitate further research necessary to assess the possibility of extrapolating previous MLDF results to study the long-term dynamics of genetic diversity in various small chicken germplasm populations over time. In general, the whole-genome characterization of populations and breeds by multiple SNP loci will further form the basis for the development and implementation of genomic selection with the aim of effective use of the genetic potential of the domestic gene pool in the poultry industry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia V. Dementieva
- Russian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding—Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Research Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, 196601 St. Petersburg, Russia
- Correspondence: (N.V.D.); (M.N.R.)
| | - Yuri S. Shcherbakov
- Russian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding—Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Research Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, 196601 St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Valentina I. Tyshchenko
- Russian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding—Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Research Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, 196601 St. Petersburg, Russia
| | | | - Anatoly B. Vakhrameev
- Russian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding—Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Research Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, 196601 St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Olga A. Nikolaeva
- Russian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding—Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Research Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, 196601 St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Anna E. Ryabova
- Russian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding—Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Research Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, 196601 St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Anastasiia I. Azovtseva
- Russian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding—Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Research Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, 196601 St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Olga V. Mitrofanova
- Russian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding—Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Research Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, 196601 St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Grigoriy K. Peglivanyan
- Russian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding—Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Research Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, 196601 St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Natalia R. Reinbah
- Russian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding—Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Research Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, 196601 St. Petersburg, Russia
| | | | - Michael N. Romanov
- School of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NJ, UK
- Correspondence: (N.V.D.); (M.N.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vakhrameev AB, Narushin VG, Larkina TA, Barkova OY, Peglivanyan GK, Dysin AP, Dementieva NV, Makarova AV, Shcherbakov YS, Pozovnikova MV, Bondarenko YV, Griffin DK, Romanov MN. Selection-driven chicken phenome and phenomenon of pectoral angle variation across different chicken phenotypes. Livest Sci 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2022.105067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|
4
|
Abdelmanova AS, Dotsev AV, Romanov MN, Stanishevskaya OI, Gladyr EA, Rodionov AN, Vetokh AN, Volkova NA, Fedorova ES, Gusev IV, Griffin DK, Brem G, Zinovieva NA. Unveiling Comparative Genomic Trajectories of Selection and Key Candidate Genes in Egg-Type Russian White and Meat-Type White Cornish Chickens. BIOLOGY 2021; 10:biology10090876. [PMID: 34571753 PMCID: PMC8469556 DOI: 10.3390/biology10090876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2021] [Revised: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Comparison of genomic footprints in chicken breeds with different selection history is a powerful tool in elucidating genomic regions that have been targeted by recent and more ancient selection. In the present work, we aimed at examining and comparing the trajectories of artificial selection in the genomes of the native egg-type Russian White (RW) and meat-type White Cornish (WC) breeds. Combining three different statistics (top 0.1% SNP by FST value at pairwise breed comparison, hapFLK analysis, and identification of ROH island shared by more than 50% of individuals), we detected 45 genomic regions under putative selection including 11 selective sweep regions, which were detected by at least two different methods. Four of such regions were breed-specific for each of RW breed (on GGA1, GGA5, GGA8, and GGA9) and WC breed (on GGA1, GGA5, GGA8, and GGA28), while three remaining regions on GGA2 (two sweeps) and GGA3 were common for both breeds. Most of identified genomic regions overlapped with known QTLs and/or candidate genes including those for body temperatures, egg productivity, and feed intake in RW chickens and those for growth, meat and carcass traits, and feed efficiency in WC chickens. These findings were concordant with the breed origin and history of their artificial selection. We determined a set of 188 prioritized candidate genes retrieved from the 11 overlapped regions of putative selection and reviewed their functions relative to phenotypic traits of interest in the two breeds. One of the RW-specific sweep regions harbored the known domestication gene, TSHR. Gene ontology and functional annotation analysis provided additional insight into a functional coherence of genes in the sweep regions. We also showed a greater candidate gene richness on microchromosomes relative to macrochromosomes in these genomic areas. Our results on the selection history of RW and WC chickens and their key candidate genes under selection serve as a profound information for further conservation of their genomic diversity and efficient breeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra S. Abdelmanova
- L.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, 142132 Podolsk, Russia; (A.S.A.); (A.V.D.); (E.A.G.); (A.N.R.); (A.N.V.); (N.A.V.); (I.V.G.)
| | - Arsen V. Dotsev
- L.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, 142132 Podolsk, Russia; (A.S.A.); (A.V.D.); (E.A.G.); (A.N.R.); (A.N.V.); (N.A.V.); (I.V.G.)
| | - Michael N. Romanov
- School of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NJ, UK;
- K.I. Skryabin Moscow State Academy of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnology, 23 Akademika Skryabina St., 109472 Moscow, Russia
- Correspondence: (M.N.R.); (N.A.Z.); Tel.: +798-57154351 (M.N.R.); +749-67651163 (N.A.Z.)
| | - Olga I. Stanishevskaya
- Russian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding—Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, 196601 St. Petersburg, Russia; (O.I.S.); (E.S.F.)
| | - Elena A. Gladyr
- L.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, 142132 Podolsk, Russia; (A.S.A.); (A.V.D.); (E.A.G.); (A.N.R.); (A.N.V.); (N.A.V.); (I.V.G.)
| | - Andrey N. Rodionov
- L.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, 142132 Podolsk, Russia; (A.S.A.); (A.V.D.); (E.A.G.); (A.N.R.); (A.N.V.); (N.A.V.); (I.V.G.)
| | - Anastasia N. Vetokh
- L.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, 142132 Podolsk, Russia; (A.S.A.); (A.V.D.); (E.A.G.); (A.N.R.); (A.N.V.); (N.A.V.); (I.V.G.)
| | - Natalia A. Volkova
- L.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, 142132 Podolsk, Russia; (A.S.A.); (A.V.D.); (E.A.G.); (A.N.R.); (A.N.V.); (N.A.V.); (I.V.G.)
| | - Elena S. Fedorova
- Russian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding—Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, 196601 St. Petersburg, Russia; (O.I.S.); (E.S.F.)
| | - Igor V. Gusev
- L.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, 142132 Podolsk, Russia; (A.S.A.); (A.V.D.); (E.A.G.); (A.N.R.); (A.N.V.); (N.A.V.); (I.V.G.)
| | - Darren K. Griffin
- School of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NJ, UK;
| | - Gottfried Brem
- Institute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1210 Vienna, Austria;
| | - Natalia A. Zinovieva
- L.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, 142132 Podolsk, Russia; (A.S.A.); (A.V.D.); (E.A.G.); (A.N.R.); (A.N.V.); (N.A.V.); (I.V.G.)
- Correspondence: (M.N.R.); (N.A.Z.); Tel.: +798-57154351 (M.N.R.); +749-67651163 (N.A.Z.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Effects of Essential Oils-Based Supplement and Salmonella Infection on Gene Expression, Blood Parameters, Cecal Microbiome, and Egg Production in Laying Hens. Animals (Basel) 2021; 11:ani11020360. [PMID: 33535430 PMCID: PMC7912222 DOI: 10.3390/ani11020360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2020] [Revised: 01/26/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
One of the main roles in poultry resistance to infections caused by Salmonella is attributed to host immunity and intestinal microbiota. We conducted an experiment that involved challenging Lohmann White laying hens with Salmonella Enteritidis (SE), feeding them a diet supplemented with an EOs-based phytobiotic Intebio®. At 1 and 7 days post-inoculation, the expression profiles of eight genes related to immunity, transport of nutrients in the intestine, and metabolism were examined. Cecal microbiome composition and blood biochemical/immunological indices were also explored and egg production traits recorded. As a result, the SE challenge of laying hens and Intebio® administration had either a suppressive or activating effect on the expression level of the studied genes (e.g., IL6 and BPIFB3), the latter echoing mammalian/human tissue-specific expression. There were also effects of the pathogen challenge and phytobiotic intake on the cecal microbiome profiles and blood biochemical/immunological parameters, including those reflecting the activity of the birds' immune systems (e.g., serum bactericidal activity, β-lysine content, and immunoglobulin levels). Significant differences between control and experimental subgroups in egg performance traits (i.e., egg weight/number/mass) were also found. The phytobiotic administration suggested a positive effect on the welfare and productivity of poultry.
Collapse
|
6
|
Dementieva NV, Kudinov AA, Larkina TA, Mitrofanova OV, Dysin AP, Terletsky VP, Tyshchenko VI, Griffin DK, Romanov MN. Genetic Variability in Local and Imported Germplasm Chicken Populations as Revealed by Analyzing Runs of Homozygosity. Animals (Basel) 2020; 10:ani10101887. [PMID: 33076516 PMCID: PMC7602725 DOI: 10.3390/ani10101887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2020] [Revised: 10/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary To maintain the uniqueness of conserved chicken populations of local and imported breeds is of great importance. In this study, we genotyped small populations belonging to 14 breeds and 7 crossbreds using an Illumina Chicken 60K SNP (Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms) BeadChip and looked for appropriate methods to characterize their purity/variability. It was not straightforward to identify crossbred individuals, and the best approach was based on calculating the length and number of homozygous regions, or runs of homozygosity (ROH), in the populations studied. The latter enabled most accurate identification of crossbreds and can be served as an effective tool in testing genome-wide purity of chicken breeds. Abstract Preserving breed uniqueness and purity is vitally important in developing conservation/breeding programs for a germplasm collection of rare and endangered chicken breeds. The present study was aimed at analyzing SNP genetic variability of 21 small local and imported purebred and F1 crossbred populations and identifying crossbreeding events via whole-genome evaluation of runs of homozygosity (ROH). The admixture models more efficiently reflected population structure, pinpointing crossbreeding events in the presence of ancestral populations but not in their absence. Multidimensional scaling and FST-based analyses did not discriminate properly between purebred populations and F1 crossbreds, especially when comparing related breeds. When applying the ROH-based approach, more and longer ROHs were revealed in purebred individuals/populations, suggesting this as an effective implement in genome-wide analysis of germplasm breed purity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia V. Dementieva
- Russian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding (RRIFAGB)—Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Science Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St. Petersburg 196601, Russia; (N.V.D.); (A.A.K.); (T.A.L.); (O.V.M.); (A.P.D.); (V.P.T.); (V.I.T.)
| | - Andrei A. Kudinov
- Russian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding (RRIFAGB)—Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Science Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St. Petersburg 196601, Russia; (N.V.D.); (A.A.K.); (T.A.L.); (O.V.M.); (A.P.D.); (V.P.T.); (V.I.T.)
| | - Tatiana A. Larkina
- Russian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding (RRIFAGB)—Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Science Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St. Petersburg 196601, Russia; (N.V.D.); (A.A.K.); (T.A.L.); (O.V.M.); (A.P.D.); (V.P.T.); (V.I.T.)
| | - Olga V. Mitrofanova
- Russian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding (RRIFAGB)—Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Science Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St. Petersburg 196601, Russia; (N.V.D.); (A.A.K.); (T.A.L.); (O.V.M.); (A.P.D.); (V.P.T.); (V.I.T.)
| | - Artyom P. Dysin
- Russian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding (RRIFAGB)—Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Science Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St. Petersburg 196601, Russia; (N.V.D.); (A.A.K.); (T.A.L.); (O.V.M.); (A.P.D.); (V.P.T.); (V.I.T.)
| | - Valeriy P. Terletsky
- Russian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding (RRIFAGB)—Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Science Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St. Petersburg 196601, Russia; (N.V.D.); (A.A.K.); (T.A.L.); (O.V.M.); (A.P.D.); (V.P.T.); (V.I.T.)
| | - Valentina I. Tyshchenko
- Russian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding (RRIFAGB)—Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Science Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St. Petersburg 196601, Russia; (N.V.D.); (A.A.K.); (T.A.L.); (O.V.M.); (A.P.D.); (V.P.T.); (V.I.T.)
| | | | - Michael N. Romanov
- School of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NJ, UK;
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Examination of the Expression of Immunity Genes and Bacterial Profiles in the Caecum of Growing Chickens Infected with Salmonella Enteritidis and Fed a Phytobiotic. Animals (Basel) 2019; 9:ani9090615. [PMID: 31462004 PMCID: PMC6770741 DOI: 10.3390/ani9090615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2019] [Revised: 08/05/2019] [Accepted: 08/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Salmonellosis is among the most common infectious poultry diseases that also represent a high risk to human health. The pathological process caused by Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis (SE) triggers in the caecum the expression of certain genes, e.g., avian β-defensins (gallinacins), cytokines (interleukins), etc. On the other hand, gut microbiota influences the infection potential of pathogens. The present study aimed at revealing the differential expression of genes associated with the immune system and changes in the bacterial communities in the intestine of growing chickens in response to SE infection. We also tested a feed additive, essential oils-based phytobiotic Intebio, as a potential alternative to antibiotics and showed effects of its administration on the caecal microbiome composition and the expression of some genes related to immunity. The phytobiotic showed its efficiency for application in poultry rearing and production. Abstract This study was performed to investigate the differential expression of eight immunity genes and the bacterial profiles in the caecum of growing chickens challenged with Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis (SE) at 1 and 23 days post inoculation (dpi) in response to SE infection at 19 days of age and administration of the phytobiotic Intebio. Following infection, the genes CASP6 and IRF7 were upregulated by greater than twofold. Chicks fed Intebio showed at 1 dpi upregulation of AvBD10, IL6, IL8L2, CASP6 and IRF7. At 23 dpi, expression of AvBD11, IL6, IL8L2, CASP6 and IRF7 lowered in the experiment subgroups as compared with the control. Examination of the caecal contents at 1 dpi demonstrated a significant decrease in the microbial biodiversity in the infected subgroup fed normal diet. Bacterial content of Lactobacillus and Bacillus declined, while that of Enterobacteriaceae rose. In the infected subgroup fed Intebio, a pronounced change in composition of the microflora was not observed. In the early infection stages, the phytobiotic seemed to promote response to infection. Subsequently, an earlier suppression of the inflammatory reaction took place in chickens fed Intebio. Thus, use of Intebio as a drug with phytobiotic activity in chickens, including those infected with Salmonella, proved to be promising.
Collapse
|
8
|
Kudinov AA, Dementieva NV, Mitrofanova OV, Stanishevskaya OI, Fedorova ES, Larkina TA, Mishina AI, Plemyashov KV, Griffin DK, Romanov MN. Genome-wide association studies targeting the yield of extraembryonic fluid and production traits in Russian White chickens. BMC Genomics 2019; 20:270. [PMID: 30947682 PMCID: PMC6449956 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-019-5605-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2018] [Accepted: 03/13/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The Russian White is a gene pool breed, registered in 1953 after crossing White Leghorns with local populations and, for 50 years, selected for cold tolerance and high egg production (EL). The breed has great potential in meeting demands of local food producers, commercial farmers and biotechnology sector of specific pathogen-free (SPF) eggs, the former valuing the breed for its egg weight (EW), EL, age at first egg (AFE), body weight (BW), and the latter for its yield of extraembryonic fluid (YEF) in 12.5-day embryos, ratio of extraembryonic fluid to egg weight, and embryo mass. Moreover, its cold tolerance has been presumably associated with day-old chick down colour (DOCDC) – white rather than yellow, the genetic basis of these traits being however poorly understood. Results We undertook genome-wide association studies (GWASs) for eight performance traits using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping of 146 birds and an Illumina 60KBeadChip. Several suggestive associations (p < 5.16*10− 5) were found for YEF, AFE, BW and EW. Moreover, on chromosome 2, an association with the white DOCDC was found where there is an linkage disequilibrium block of SNPs including genes that are responsible not for colour, but for immune resistance. Conclusions The obtained GWAS data can be used to explore the genetics of immunity and carry out selection for increasing YEF for SPF eggs production. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-019-5605-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrei A Kudinov
- Russian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding Branch of the L. K. Ernst Federal Science Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St Petersburg, 196601, Russia.,University of Helsinki, FI-00014, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Natalia V Dementieva
- Russian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding Branch of the L. K. Ernst Federal Science Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St Petersburg, 196601, Russia
| | - Olga V Mitrofanova
- Russian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding Branch of the L. K. Ernst Federal Science Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St Petersburg, 196601, Russia
| | - Olga I Stanishevskaya
- Russian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding Branch of the L. K. Ernst Federal Science Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St Petersburg, 196601, Russia
| | - Elena S Fedorova
- Russian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding Branch of the L. K. Ernst Federal Science Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St Petersburg, 196601, Russia
| | - Tatiana A Larkina
- Russian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding Branch of the L. K. Ernst Federal Science Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St Petersburg, 196601, Russia
| | - Arina I Mishina
- Russian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding Branch of the L. K. Ernst Federal Science Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St Petersburg, 196601, Russia
| | - Kirill V Plemyashov
- Russian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding Branch of the L. K. Ernst Federal Science Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St Petersburg, 196601, Russia
| | - Darren K Griffin
- School of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NJ, UK.
| | - Michael N Romanov
- Russian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding Branch of the L. K. Ernst Federal Science Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St Petersburg, 196601, Russia.,School of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NJ, UK
| |
Collapse
|