Comparison of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) and capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) as adjuvant chemotherapies for stage II and III gastric cancer after D2 resection: A single-center retrospective study

Comparison of SOX and CAPOX in patients with advanced gastric cancer after laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Optimal adjuvant chemotherapy after laparoscopic surgery in gastric cancer (GC) patients is still undefined. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) and capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) in patients with GC after laparoscopic gastrectomy.

METHODS

A non-inferiority randomized controlled clinical trial was performed in China. Patients with advanced GC who underwent laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy were randomly assigned to receive SOX and CAPOX regimens.

RESULTS

In total, 191 patients were screened between May 2018 and June 2019, and 140 (73.3%) were included in the modified intent-to-treat analysis (mITT), of whom 69 and 71 were assigned to the SOX and CAPOX groups, respectively. The SOX group had similar 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival to the CAPOX group. Subgroup analysis revealed significantly better OS in the SOX group for male patients ([HR] = 0.395; 95% [CI], 0.153-1.019; p = 0.045), age >60 (HR = 0.219; 95% [CI], 0.064-0.753; p = 0.016), tumors in the gastric antrum (HR = 0.273; 95% [CI], 0.076-0.981; p = 0.047), and moderately differentiated tumors (HR = 0.338; 95% [CI], 0.110-1.041; p = 0.041). There were no significant differences observed in terms of adverse events and recurrence patterns between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant SOX was non-inferior to CAPOX treatments for patients with GC who underwent curative laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy. For male patients, aged >60 years, tumors in the gastric antrum, and moderately differentiated tumors, adjuvant SOX may achieve an improvement compared with CAPOX.

Prognostic value of blood lipids on patients treated with oxaliplatin combined with S-1 (SOX) after radical gastrectomy and establishment of prognostic nomogram

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the prognostic significance of plasma total cholesterol (TC) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) in patients with gastric cancer receiving oxaliplatin combination with S-1 (SOX) chemotherapy after radical resection and to establish models of relevant prognostic influencing factors.

METHOD

The clinicopathologic features of 301 patients treated with SOX after radical gastrectomy were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate analysis, multivariate analysis, and the Kaplan-Meier survival curve were used to analyze the prognostic value of TC and HDL in patients undergoing adjuvant SOX chemotherapy after curative gastric surgery. Based on the results of multivariate Cox regression, we constructed nomograms to predict 1 and 3-year CSS (cancer-specific survival time) and DFS (disease-free survival time) in patients with adjuvant chemotherapy after radical gastrectomy. We assessed the model's accuracy using the consistency index (C index) and calibration curve, and the ROC curve and DCA curve were applied to compare it with TNM staging.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis revealed that TC and HDL were independent influencing factors of CSS, while HDL was an independent factor unique to DFS. According to Kaplan-Meier curves, low TC and HDL suggested poor survival (P < 0.001). The relevant prognostic factors from the multivariate study were used to build nomograms for DFS and CSS. Both DFS and CSS had C index and AUC values that were higher than 0.71. The calibration curves demonstrated that the predicted results are consistent with the observed results. The AUC valves for DFS and CSS in our models were higher than TNM staging. The decision curve analysis indicated that net benefits were moderately positive. Significant differences in survival were seen between the high and low-risk groups according to the nomogram risk score.

CONCLUSIONS

TC and HDL have a certain significance for the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer after radical resection receiving adjuvant SOX chemotherapy. Lower TC and HDL suggested poor DFS and CSS. Both prediction models for CSS and DFS demonstrated good predictive ability and had a higher predictive value than the TNM staging system.

The predictive model for risk of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia based on antineoplastic drugs for solid tumors in eastern China

Chemotherapy-related thrombocytopenia (CIT) is a significant adverse event during chemotherapy, which can lead to reduced relative dose intensity, increased risk of serious bleeding and additional medical expenditure. Herein, we aimed to develop and validate a predictive nomogram model for prediction of CIT in patients with solid tumor. From Jun 1, 2018 to Sep 9, 2021, a total of 1541 patients who received 5750 cycles of chemotherapy were retrospectively enrolled. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify predictive factors to establish the nomogram model for CIT. The incidence of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia was 21.03% for patient-based and 10.26% for cycles of chemotherapy. The top five solid tumors with CIT are cervix, gastric, bladder, biliary systemic, and ovarian. The incidence of chemotherapy dose delays in any cycle because of CIT was 5.39%. Multivariate analysis showed that tumor site, treatment line, AST, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine were significantly associated with CIT. Moreover, we established a nomogram model for CIT probability prediction, and the model was well calibrated (Hosme-Lemeshow P = 0.230) and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.844 (Sensitivity was 0.625, Specificity was 0.901). We developed a predictive model for chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia based on readily available and easily assessable clinical characteristics. The predictive model based on clinical and laboratory indices represents a promising tool in the prediction of CIT, which might complement the clinical management of thrombocytopenia.

A new scoring system to evaluate adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with T2N0M0 gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

At present, there is insufficient medical evidence to determine whether adjuvant chemotherapy is necessary for T2N0M0 gastric cancer.

AIM

To obtain a risk score to assess the need for adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with T2N0M0 gastric cancer.

METHODS

We identified 325 patients with pathological T2N0M0 stage primary gastric cancer at the National Cancer Center between 2011 and 2018. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to predict factors affecting prognosis. Vascular invasion, tumor site, and body mass index were assessed, and a scoring system was established. We compared the survival outcomes and benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy between the different subgroups.

RESULTS

Five-year survival rates of the score 0, 1, 2, and 3 groups were 92%, 95%, 80%, and 50%, respectively (P < 0.001). In the score 2-3 group, five-year survival rates for patients in the adjuvant chemotherapy group and postoperative observation group were 95% and 61%, respectively (P = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

For patients with T2N0M0 stage gastric cancer and two or more risk factors, adjuvant chemotherapy after D2 gastrectomy may have a survival benefit.

Total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: study protocol for a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, phase II clinical trial

Background

Gastric cancer ranks high in terms of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Multimodal therapy is therefore essential for locally advanced gastric cancer. Recent studies have demonstrated that both perioperative chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy can improve the prognosis of patients. However, the completion rate of chemotherapy after surgery remains low, which may affect survival. Thus, identifying the best way to combine radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgery is important. The aim of this study was to explore the toxicity and efficacy of the total neoadjuvant therapy modality for locally advanced gastric cancer.

Methods

This study will be a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, phase II clinical trial. Patients diagnosed with locally advanced (stage cT3-4 and cN positive, AJCC 8th) gastric cancer and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma will be enrolled. Patients will initially receive radiotherapy (95% planned target volume: 45 Gy/25 f) and concurrent chemotherapy (S-1: 40–60 mg twice a day) followed by six cycles of consolidated chemotherapy (SOX, consisting of S-1 and oxaliplatin) and surgery. The primary objective will assess pathological complete response; the secondary objectives will include toxicities assessing surgical complications, the tumor downstaging rate and the R0 resection rate.

Discussion

Investigation of total neoadjuvant therapy in gastric cancer is limited. The goal of this trial is to explore the efficacy and toxicity of total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04062058, August 20, 2019).

Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph node ratio in patients with gastric cancer after curative gastrectomy: a single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of Metastatic lymph node ratio (MLNR) after curative gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer (GC) and the potential for new indicators to strengthen the current guidelines.

METHODS

We retrospectively researched 3864 GC patients with curative gastrectomy between February 2011 and February 2016. The following clinical data were collected from the included patients: gender, type of gastrectomy, tumor location, T stage, N stage, ELN, tumor size, age at surgery, perineural invasion, vascular invasion, TNM stage, survival time and survival status. Patients were divided into low-MLNR (L-MLNR), and high-MLNR (H-MLNR) groups based on adjusted the X-tile cutoff-value of 0.25 for MLNR, the survival rates and clinicopathological characteristics of each group were compared. For the assessment of significant associations between clinicopathological characteristics and patients' survival, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards analysis. The log-rank test was used to examine the statistical significance of differences among different survival curves. Clinicopathological features significantly associated with MLNR were assessed by the Chi-square test and multinomial logistic regression. The discriminative ability was measured by calculating the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) values for each category. Assessment of the effect of clinicopathological features on MLNR for predicting prognosis of GC patients used stratum analysis through Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional risk Analysis.

RESULTS

Survival analysis indicated that MLNR was negatively associated with overall survival (OS) (p < .001) and was an independent prognostic predictor in 3864 GC patients (p < .001). MLNR had significant prognostic significance in various subgroups with clinicopathological characteristics (gender, type of gastrectomy, tumor location, T stage, N stage, ELN, tumor size, age at surgery, perineural invasion, vascular invasion, and TNM stage) (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The MLNR may become a new indicator to assess the prognosis of GC patients who underwent curative gastrectomy. The results may have potential clinical implications that should be considered when developing clinical practice guidelines or the design of the future investigation.

Adjuvant chemotherapy is an additional option for locally advanced gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy: a retrospective control study

BACKGROUND

This study compared the long-term efficacy of different durations of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 428 patients with stage II-III gastric cancer who underwent D2 gastrectomy between 2009 and 2016. Patients were divided into four groups according to the duration of adjuvant chemotherapy, including 0 week (no adjuvant, group A), 20 to 24 weeks (completed 7-8 cycles every 3 weeks or 10-12 cycles every 2 weeks, group B), and 12 to18 weeks (completed 4-6 cycles every 3 weeks or 6-9 cycles every 2 weeks, group C), and less than 12 weeks (received up to 3 cycles every 3 weeks or 5 cycles every 2 weeks, group D). The chemotherapy regimens included XELOX, SOX, and FOLFOX. 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed.

RESULTS

The 5-year OS rates for groups A, B, C, and D were 52.3, 73.7, 72.0, and 53.3%, respectively, and the 5-year DFS rates were 50.0, 68.0, 65.4, and 50.0%, respectively. OS and DFS were higher in group B than in groups A and D. Similarly, patients in group C were more likely to have higher OS and DFS than those in groups A and D. Meanwhile, there were no significant differences in OS and DFS between groups B and C. The multivariate analysis confirmed with high statistical significance the efficacy of complete courses of adjuvant chemotherapy, and, among them, the similar impact of 4-6/6-9 and 7-8/10-12 cycles, resulting in similar HRs vs Group A (0.52 and 0.42, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

To reduce toxicity and maintain efficacy, XELOX or SOX chemotherapy regimens administered for 4-6 cycles every 3 weeks or FOLFOX regimen for 6-9 cycles every 2 weeks might be a favorable option for patients with stage II-III gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy. Prospective multicenter clinical trials with adequate sample sizes are necessary to verify these findings.

Comparison of S-1-based vs. capecitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

S-1-based and capecitabine-based adjuvant treatments are proved efficacious for patients with gastric cancer, but conventional meta-analyses of the direct comparisons between two alternative adjuvant regimens to resection of GC have not been attempted.

AIM

The aim of this review was to compare the disease-free survival, overall survival and adverse events in patients receiving the S-1- and capecitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapies for treatment of gastric cancer (GC) patients undergoing resection.

METHODS

A search of the academic literature was performed in PUBMED, SCOPUS, CENTRAL and EMBASE databases along with manual search in relevant journals for studies in English, to identify comparative studies comparing the effect of S-1-based chemotherapy and capecitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), used in combination with surgical resection for treatment of gastric cancer. Both qualitative and quantitative analyses was carried out for all the included studies. The hazard ratios (HR) of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were pooled using generic inverse variance method. The included studies were assessed for risk of bias using ROBINS-E (risk of bias in non-randomized studies of exposures) tool.

RESULTS

Seven retrospective cohort studies, two prospective cohort studies and one randomized clinical trial were included. Both S-1- and capecitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy for treatment of stage 2 or 3 gastric cancer had similar effects on the 3-year and 5-year DFS rates, overall survival and adverse events in the included studies. There was no difference in the adjusted hazard ratios (HR) of OS and DFS (0.86 95% CI (0.68, 1.09); p = 0.21 and 0.96 95% CI (0.75, 1.24), respectively). Oral mucositis was increasingly associated with S-1-based AC, while incidences of adverse events such as neutropenia, anaemia and thrombocytopenia were similar to those of capecitabine-based regimen. The quality of the included studies was found to be low to moderate.

CONCLUSION

S-1- and capecitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapies can be used interchangeably as an adjuvant chemotherapeutic regimen postradical gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection.

Comparison of the Efficacy of S-1 Plus Oxaliplatin or Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin for Six and Eight Chemotherapy Cycles as Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Stage II-III Gastric Cancer After D2 Resection

Objective

To compare the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy with six or eight cycles of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) or Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) after D2 resection of GC.

Design and participants

We collected 470 cases of patients with TNM stage II and III GC who underwent D2 gastrectomy in the Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital from January 2007 to December 2017 and received six or eight cycles of SOX or XELOX regimen. This study was designed to evaluate the prognosis of patients receiving six or eight cycles of SOX or XELOX chemotherapy and identify the appropriate number of chemotherapy cycles.

Results

Among the 470 study participants [340 (72.3%) males; median age, 50 years (range, 24-76 years)], 355 and 115 received XELOX or SOX regimen chemotherapy, respectively. The number of 152 patients included in this study who received 6 and 8 cycles of chemotherapy in stage II and stage III without considering chemotherapy regimens were 125 and 27. The median DFS was, respectively, 14.9 months and 26.8 months (P = 0.08), the median OS was, respectively, 30.2 months and 30.8 months (P = 0.5), the difference was not statistically significant. Comprehensive survival analysis of XELOX and SOX group showed no significant difference for DFS (P = 0.29) and OS (P = 0.61). The total number of stage III GC patients who received six and eight cycles of chemotherapy was 92 and 19, respectively. The median DFS of patients who received six and eight cycles of chemotherapy was 14.6 and 23.2 months (P = 0.3), respectively. The median OS of patients who received six and eight cycles of chemotherapy was 26 and 30.6 months (P = 0.9), respectively. Comprehensive analysis of DFS (P=0.73) and OS (P=0.6) shows no difference between the XELOX group SOX groups. Subgroup analysis revealed significant differences in the gender (P = 0.05) and histological classification (P < 0.05) distribution.

Conclusion

Regardless of the XELOX regimen or the SOX regimen, similar survival benefits are observed in patients receiving six or eight chemotherapy cycles irrespective of the regimen used. The XELOX and SOX regimens are well tolerated in patients undergoing D2 resection of GC.

Maintenance Chemotherapy with S-1 Following SOX Regimen Chemotherapy Improves Prognosis of Stage 3 Gastric Cancer After D2 Gastrectomy: A 5-Year Analysis

Objective

To assess the effectiveness and safety of treatment consisting of maintenance chemotherapy (MCT) with S-1 following S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) chemotherapy for stage 3 gastric cancer (GC) after D2 gastrectomy.

Methods

In this retrospective study, we enrolled 255 patients with stage 3 GC who underwent D2 gastrectomy between February 2011 and May 2014. The SOX regimen chemotherapy was administrated to all of the patients as adjuvant therapy. The SOX regimen consisted of S-1 (for patients with a body surface area [BSA] of less than 1.25 m², 80 mg/d; 100 mg/d for BSA=1.25 m²- <1.5 m², and 120 mg/d for BSA≥1.5 m², in 2 divided doses for 14 d) and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m² given on Day 1), repeated every 21 d for 8 cycles. Following SOX chemotherapy, 122 of these patients received maintenance chemotherapy (the MCT group) with S-1, whereas 133 patients (the control group) received no MCT. The MCT consisted of S-1 (80, 100, or 120 mg daily based on BSA, in 2 divided doses for 14 d), repeated every 21 d for 8 cycles at most. The chemotherapy was discontinued if unacceptable toxicity or disease progression occurred or upon the request of the patient. All cases were followed up, and overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and toxicities were compared.

Results

The MCT group exhibited a distinctly higher 5-year OS (P=0.0425) and RFS (P=0.0479) than those of the control group. The incidence of hand-foot syndrome was markedly greater in the MCT group (P=0.0026). No toxicity-related death occurred.

Conclusion

Maintenance chemotherapy with S-1 following the SOX regimen chemotherapy provides significant survival benefit for stage 3 GC after D2 gastrectomy.

Comparison of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) and capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) as adjuvant chemotherapies for stage II and III gastric cancer after D2 resection: A single-center retrospective study

Background

Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) as adjuvant therapy for gastric cancer (GC) reduces cancer recurrence and improves survival. S‐1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) is well‐tolerated and effective against advanced GC, and also be used widely in adjuvant treatment. However, data comparing SOX and XELOX as adjuvant treatments are lacking.

Method

Data on treatment modalities, adverse events, recurrence and metastasis were collected from 180 patients with stage II and III GC, who received SOX or XELOX after D2 gastrectomy between January 2012 and December 2015, and analyzed retrospectively. The primary endpoint was 3‐year disease‐free survival (DFS) rate.

Results

Median follow was 52.9 months; 3‐year DFS rate and overall survival (OS) rate were 75.2% and 67.6% (P = 0.359) and 81.2% and 83.3% (P = 0.77) in the SOX and XELOX groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in peritoneal metastasis rates in the SOX and XELOX groups (8.6% vs 15%, respectively; P = 0.232). Compound recurrent disease was associated with significantly shorter OS. Multivariate analysis identified metastatic lymph node ratio (LNR) as an independent prognostic factor for OS (P = 0.036; hazard ratio = 2.875; 95% confidence interval, 1.069–7.729); the LNR ≥17% group had inferior 3‐year OS rate to the LNR <17% group (P = 0.001). The incidence of grades 3 and 4 adverse events was similar in both groups; however, grade ≥2 hand–foot syndrome was significantly less frequent in the SOX group (P = 0.01).

Conclusion

SOX has similar survival benefits to XELOX and is well‐tolerated in Chinese patients with GC following D2 gastrectomy.