Effect of HCV, HIV and coinfection in kidney transplant recipients: mate kidney analyses

An Enhanced Role of Innate Immunity in the Immune Response After Kidney Transplant in People Living With HIV: A Transcriptomic Analysis

BACKGROUND

Although kidney transplantation (KT) has become the standard of care for people living with HIV (PLWH) suffering from renal failure, early experiences revealed unanticipated higher rejection rates than those observed in HIV- recipients. The cause of increased acute rejection (AR) in PLWH was assessed by performing a transcriptomic analysis of biopsy specimens, comparing HIV+ to HIV- recipients.

METHODS

An analysis of 68 (34 HIV+, 34 HIV-) formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) renal biopsies matched for degree of inflammation was performed from KT recipients with acute T cell-mediated rejection (aTCMR), borderline for aTCMR (BL), and normal findings. Gene expression was measured using the NanoString platform on a custom gene panel to assess differential gene expression (DE) and pathway analysis (PA).

RESULTS

DE analysis revealed multiple genes with significantly increased expression in the HIV+ cohort in aTCMR and BL relative to the HIV- cohort. PA of these genes showed enrichment of various inflammatory pathways, particularly innate immune pathways associated with Toll-like receptors.

CONCLUSIONS

Upregulation of the innate immune pathways in the biopsies of PLWH with aTCMR and BL is suggestive of a unique immune response that may stem from immune dysregulation related to HIV infection. These findings suggest that these unique HIV-driven pathways may in part be contributory to the increased incidence of allograft rejection after renal transplantation in PLWH.

Beyond Immunity: Challenges in Kidney Retransplantation Among Persons Living With HIV

INTRODUCTION

While superb outcomes have been observed in the HIV-positive (HIV+) population, graft failure and subsequent need for kidney retransplantation (re-KT) remain a concern. This study aims to investigate the difference in success rates of re-KT allograft survival in the HIV+ versus HIV-negative (HIV-) population in the current era of transplantation (2014-2022).

METHODS

Data was collected from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network on all kidney transplant donors and recipients who had their first re-KT between 2014 and 2022. Allograft survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis with a log-rank test, while risk factors for graft loss were assessed using Cox proportional hazards with statistical significance set to P = 0.05.

RESULTS

HIV+ recipients were significantly more likely to be Black (P < 0.001), have an HLA mismatch >3 (P = 0.018), delayed graft function (P = 0.023), and graft loss from primary nonfunction (P < 0.001). Their HIV- counterparts were more likely to be White (P < 0.001) and Hispanic (<0.001), lose their graft from acute rejection (P = 0.044), and have a living donor (P = 0.001). Being HIV+ was associated with a 1.68-fold increased risk of graft loss, an HLA mismatch >3 held a 1.18-fold increase, experiencing delayed graft function held a 1.89-fold increase, and having diabetes was associated with a 1.16-fold increased risk. Living donor kidneys were associated with a 15.8% decrease in risk for graft failure. Kaplan-Meier curves showed a significantly lower duration of kidney allograft survival in the HIV+ community (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Disproportional graft failure and inadequate HLA mismatching persist within the HIV+ Re-KT community. Stronger organ matching and new approaches for desensitizing retransplant candidates are vital.

The changing landscape of HIV-associated kidney disease

The HIV epidemic has devastated millions of people globally, with approximately 40 million deaths since its start. The availability of antiretroviral therapy (ART) has transformed the prognosis of millions of individuals infected with HIV such that a diagnosis of HIV infection no longer automatically confers death. However, morbidity and mortality remain substantial among people living with HIV. HIV can directly infect the kidney to cause HIV-associated nephropathy (HIVAN) - a disease characterized by podocyte and tubular damage and associated with an increased risk of kidney failure. The reports of HIVAN occurring primarily in those of African ancestry led to the discovery of its association with APOL1 risk alleles. The advent of ART has led to a substantial decrease in the prevalence of HIVAN; however, reports have emerged of an increase in the prevalence of other kidney pathology, such as focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and pathological conditions associated with co-morbidities of ageing, such as hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Early initiation of ART also results in a longer cumulative exposure to medications, increasing the likelihood of nephrotoxicity. A substantial body of literature supports the use of kidney transplantation in people living with HIV, demonstrating significant survival benefits compared with that of people undergoing chronic dialysis, and similar long-term allograft and patient survival compared with that of HIV-negative kidney transplant recipients.

Expanding Access to Organ Transplant for People Living With HIV: Can Policy Catch Up to Outcomes Data?

Advances in antiretroviral and immunosuppressive regimens have improved outcomes following solid organ transplantation in people living with HIV (PLWH). The HIV Organ Policy and Equity Act was conceived to reduce the discard of HIV-positive organs and improve access to transplant for PLWH. Nevertheless, PLWH continue to experience disproportionately low rates of transplant. This overview examines the hurdles to transplantation in PLWH with end-organ disease, the potential and realized impact of the HIV Organ Policy and Equity Act, and changes that could permit expanded access to organ transplant in this population.

HCV-positive kidney transplant patients treated with direct-acting antivirals maintain stable medium-term graft function despite persistent reduction in tacrolimus trough levels

BACKGROUND/AIM

Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have improved the treatment of HCV-positive kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). However, their medium-term follow-up effects on graft function are conflicting. This study aimed to analyze how the interplay between DAAs, calcineurin inhibitors (CNI), and HCV eradication impacts 12-month kidney graft function.

METHODS

This double-center retrospective study with a prospective follow-up enrolled 35 KTRs with HCV treated with DAAs for 12 weeks. We compared three parameters: estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), 24-h proteinuria, and CNI trough levels at three time points: baseline, end of treatment (EOT), and 12 months later.

RESULTS

Kidney allograft function remained stable when comparing baseline and 12-month post-treatment values of eGFR (60.7 versus 57.8 ml/min; p = 0.28) and 24-h proteinuria (0.3 versus 0.2 g/24 h; p = 0.15), while tacrolimus (Tac) trough levels underwent a statistically significant decline (6.9 versus 5.4 ng/ml; p = 0.004). Using an ongoing triple Tac-based maintenance therapy as a conservative measure, a dose escalation of Tac was applied only in seven patients. No variation in CyA and mTOR levels was detected.

CONCLUSION

DAA therapy is safe and effective in HCV-positive KTRs. It also produces a persistent significant reduction in Tac trough levels that does not influence graft function at 12 months.

Early steroid withdrawal in HIV-infected kidney transplant recipients: Utilization and outcomes

Kidney transplant (KT) outcomes for HIV-infected (HIV+) persons are excellent, yet acute rejection (AR) is common and optimal immunosuppressive regimens remain unclear. Early steroid withdrawal (ESW) is associated with AR in other populations, but its utilization and impact are unknown in HIV+ KT. Using SRTR, we identified 1225 HIV+ KT recipients between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2017, without AR, graft failure, or mortality during KT admission, and compared those with ESW with those with steroid continuation (SC). We quantified associations between ESW and AR using multivariable logistic regression and interval-censored survival analysis, as well as with graft failure and mortality using Cox regression, adjusting for donor, recipient, and immunologic factors. ESW utilization was 20.4%, with more zero HLA mismatch (8% vs 4%), living donors (26% vs 20%), and lymphodepleting induction (64% vs 46%) compared to the SC group. ESW utilization varied widely across 129 centers, with less use at high- versus moderate-volume centers (6% vs 21%, P < .001). AR was more common with ESW by 1 year (18.4% vs 12.3%; aOR: _1.08 1.61_2.41 , P = .04) and over the study period (aHR: _1.02 1.39_1.90 , P = .03), without difference in death-censored graft failure (aHR _0.60 0.91_1.36 , P = .33) or mortality (aHR: _0.75 1.15_1.77 , P = .45). To reduce AR after HIV+ KT, tailoring of ESW utilization is reasonable.

Current state of kidney transplantation in patients with HIV, hepatitis C, and hepatitis B infection

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C (HCV), and hepatitis B (HBV) are common chronic viral infections in the end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patient population that were once considered relative contraindications to kidney transplantation. In this review, we will summarize the current state of kidney transplantation in patients with HIV, HCV, and HBV, which is rapidly evolving. HIV+ patients enjoy excellent outcomes in the modern transplant era and may have new transplant opportunities with the use of HIV+ donors. Direct-acting antivirals for HCV have substantially changed the landscape of care for patients with HCV infection. HBV+ patients now have excellent patient and allograft survival with HBV therapy. Currently, kidney transplantation is a safe and appropriate treatment for the majority of ESKD patients with HIV, HCV, and HBV.

Successful Kidney Transplantation in a Recipient Coinfected with Hepatitis C Genotype 2 and HIV from a Donor Infected with Hepatitis C Genotype 1 in the Direct-Acting Antiviral Era

Despite significant advances in transplantation of HIV-infected individuals, little is known about HIV coinfected patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes other than genotype 1, especially when receiving HCV-infected organs with a different genotype. We describe the first case of kidney transplantation in a man coinfected with hepatitis C and HIV in our state. To our knowledge, this is also the first report of an HIV/HCV/HBV tri-infected patient with non-1 (2a) HCV genotype who received an HCV-infected kidney graft with the discordant genotype (1a), to which he converted after transplant. Our case study highlights the following: (1) transplant centers need to monitor wait times for an HCV-infected organ and regularly assess the risk of delaying HCV antiviral treatment for HCV-infected transplant candidates in anticipation of the transplant from an HCV-infected donor; (2) closer monitoring of tacrolimus levels during the early phases of anti-HCV protease inhibitor introduction and discontinuation may be indicated; (3) donor genotype transmission can occur; (4) HIV/HCV coinfected transplant candidates require a holistic approach with emphasis on the cardiovascular risk profile and low threshold for cardiac catheterization as part of their pretransplant evaluation.

Effect of Recipient Hepatitis C Status on Outcomes of Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has been deemed detrimental to kidney transplantation (KT) outcomes. Breakthrough HCV treatment with direct-acting antiviral (DAA) medications improved the probability of HCV+ kidney use for KT even in noninfected (HCV-) recipients. We hypothesized that recipient HCV infection influences deceased donor KT outcomes, and this effect could be modified by donor HCV status and use of DAAs.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective cohort study based on data from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network as of September 2018. A mate kidneys analysis was performed with HCV+ and HCV- recipients of solitary adult KT from ABO-compatible deceased donor between January 1994 and June 2018. We selected donors where 1 KT recipient was HCV+ and the mate kidney recipient was HCV-. Both HCV- and HCV+ donors were identified and analyzed separately. Outcomes, including survival of patients, grafts, and death-censored grafts, were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Four-hundred and twenty-five HCV+ and 5,575 HCV- donor mate kidneys were transplanted in HCV-discrepant recipients. HCV+ recipients of HCV- donor had worse patient and graft survival (adjusted hazard ratio 1.28; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.37 and adjusted hazard ratio 1.26; 95% CI 1.18 to 1.34, respectively) and death-censored grafts (adjusted hazard ratio 1.24; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.34) compared with HCV- recipients. Comparable patient and graft survival and death-censored grafts were found in recipients of HCV+ donors, regardless of recipient HCV status. The risk associated with HCV positivity in donors or recipients in the pre-DAA era (before December 2013) was no longer statistically significant in the post-DAA era.

CONCLUSIONS

Given comparable outcomes between HCV+ and HCV- recipients in post-DAA era or when receiving HCV+ donor kidneys, broader use of HCV+ kidneys regardless of the recipient's HCV status should be advocated, and allocation algorithm for HCV+ kidneys should be revised.

Direct-Acting Antiretroviral Therapy in Renal Transplant Recipients With Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Hepatitis C Virus Coinfection: Report of Our Experience and Literature Review

A minor graft and patient survival are described in renal transplant recipients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection than in recipients infected with only HIV. The high efficacy of direct-acting antivirals could improve the results. The experience reported in renal transplant recipients with coinfection is very limited.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyzed the evolution of renal recipients with HIV-HCV coinfection treated with direct-acting antivirals in our center. Clinical, analytical, and microbiological variables were collected before and after treatment.

RESULTS

From 2001 to 2018 we performed 11 renal transplants in patients with HIV infection, and 6 (54.5%) had HIV-HCV coinfection. One patient lost the graft before the development of direct-acting antivirals. Another patient with functioning graft has refused to receive any treatment. Four patients have been treated with direct-acting antivirals. One was treated 18 months before the transplant; 3 received treatment after transplant. All received sofosbuvir-based therapies. All had a sustained virologic response after 12 weeks and an improvement of liver function. In the patients treated after renal transplant, time post transplant at the beginning of treatment was 99.6 (SD, 22.8) months, and follow-up after treatment in all patients was 40.2 (SD, 8.16) months. To modify immunosuppressive regimen was not necessary, although 2 patients required an increase of tacrolimus doses. We do not observe deterioration of renal function. All have maintained a good immunologic and microbiological control without requiring changes in antiretrovirals. We do not observe complications associated with treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct-acting antivirals therapy is safe and effective and may offer new possibilities to patients with HIV-HCV coinfection.

Kidney transplant outcomes in HIV-positive patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Kidney transplantation is now a viable alternative to dialysis in HIV-positive patients who achieve good immunovirological control with the currently available antiretroviral therapy regimens. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigate the published evidence of outcome and risk of kidney transplantation in HIV-positive patients following the PRISMA guidelines.

Methods

Searches of PubMed, the Cochrane Library and EMBASE identified 27 cohort studies and 1670 case series evaluating the survival of HIV-positive kidney transplant patients published between July 2003 and May 2018. The regimens for induction, maintenance therapy and highly active antiretroviral therapy, acute rejection, patient and graft survival, CD4 count and infectious complications were recorded. We evaluated the patient survival and graft survival at 1 and 3 years respectively, acute rejection rate and also other infectious complications by using a random-effects analysis.

Results

At 1 year, patient survival was 0.97 (95% CI 0.95; 0.98), graft survival was 0.91 (95% CI 0.88; 0.94), acute rejection was 0.33 (95% CI 0.28; 0.38), and infectious complications was 0.41 (95% CI 0.34; 0.50), and at 3 years, patient survival was 0.94 (95% CI 0.90; 0.97) and graft survival was 0.81 (95% CI 0.74; 0.87).

Conclusions

With careful selection and evaluation, kidney transplantation can be performed with good outcomes in HIV-positive patients.

Viral Hepatitis C Therapy: Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Considerations: A 2019 Update

It has been estimated by the World Health Organization (WHO) that over 71 million people were infected with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) in 2015. Since then, a number of highly effective direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens have been licensed for the treatment of chronic HCV infection: sofosbuvir/daclatasvir, sofosbuvir/ledipasvir, elbasvir/grazoprevir, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir, glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, and sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir. With these treatment regimens, almost all chronic HCV-infected patients, even including prior DAA failures, can be treated effectively and safely. It is therefore likely that further development of DAAs will be limited. In this descriptive review we provide an overview of the clinical pharmacokinetic characteristics of currently available DAAs by describing their absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion. Potential drug-drug interactions with the DAAs are briefly discussed. Furthermore, we summarize what is known about the pharmacodynamics of the DAAs in terms of efficacy and safety. We briefly discuss the relationship between the pharmacokinetics of the DAAs and efficacy or toxicity in special populations, such as hard to cure patients and patients with liver cirrhosis, liver transplantation, renal impairment, hepatitis B virus or HIV co-infection, bleeding disorders, and children. The aim of this overview is to educate/update prescribers and pharmacists so that they are able to safely and effectively treat HCV-infected patients even in the presence of underlying co-infections or co-morbidities.

Hepatitis C virus infection in kidney transplantation-changing paradigms with novel agents

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a common cause of increased morbidity and mortality in kidney transplant patients. It is associated with posttransplant glomerulonephritis, chronic allograft nephropathy, and New Onset Diabetes after Transplant (NODAT). In the past, HCV was difficult to treat due to the presence of interferon alpha-based therapies that were difficult to tolerate and were associated with adverse side-effects, such as the risk of rejection. With the advent of oral directly acting antiviral therapies, the landscape for HCV and transplantation has changed. These agents are highly effective and well tolerated with minimal side-effects. Sustained viral response rates in excess of 90% are achieved with most current treatment regimens active against all HCV genotypes. These new agents may show an improvement in graft and patient survival while essentially eliminating the risk of acute rejection from the use of prior interferon-based HCV therapies. These agents may also result in an improvement in organ allocation for HCV donor/HCV recipient transplantation. This review is meant to discuss the epidemiology of HCV, the new oral direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) and future opportunities for research in the field of HCV related transplantation.

Clinical outcomes in HIV+/HCV+ coinfected kidney transplant recipients in the pre- and post-direct-acting antiviral therapy eras: 10-Year single center experience

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated inferior patient and graft survival following kidney transplant (KT) in HIV+/HCV+ coinfected patients compared to HIV+/HCV- recipients. However, these studies were conducted prior to the availability of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents and data in the modern era are lacking.

METHODS

Single center retrospective study of HIV+/HCV+ coinfected KT recipients (2007-2017). Outcomes were assessed for the pre-DAA and post-DAA (ie, after December 2013) eras including 1-year patient survival, death-censored graft survival, and acute rejection; and serious infections (defined as infections requiring admission to the intensive care unit during initial transplant hospitalization or re-admission to the hospital after discharge) within the first 6 months post-transplant.

RESULTS

A total of 13 consecutive HIV+/HCV+ recipients were identified. Median time of post-transplant follow-up was 722 days. Seven patients were transplanted in the DAA era; five of them had anti-HCV Ab+ donors, with two donors being HCV NAT positive; all received DAA therapy, six of them post-transplant (median time from KT to DAA: 83 days; IQR, 54-300). All the patients in the pre-DAA era were on a protease inhibitor-containing ART regimen. One-year patient and death-censored graft survivals were 83% and 67%, respectively, for the patients transplanted in the pre-DAA era, and 100% for both outcomes in the subgroup of patients transplanted in the post-DAA era (P > 0.05). Compared to patients in the post-DAA era, those in the pre-DAA era had higher incidence of serious infections (0 vs 67%; P = 0.02). Acute rejection exclusively occurred in the pre-DAA group (n = 1; 17%).

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes of HIV+/HCV+ KT recipients, including HIV-/HCV+ to HIV+/HCV+ transplants, in the DAA era were excellent in this small cohort. Larger studies are needed.

A Brazilian university hospital position regarding transplantation criteria for HIV-positive patients according to the current literature

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection was considered a contraindication for solid organ transplantation (SOT) in the past. However, HIV management has improved since highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) became available in 1996, and the long-term survival of patients living with HIV has led many transplant programs to reevaluate their policies regarding the exclusion of patients with HIV infection.Based on the available data in the medical literature and the cumulative experience of transplantation in HIV-positive patients at our hospital, the aim of the present article is to outline the criteria for transplantation in HIV-positive patients as recommended by the Immunocompromised Host Committee of the Hospital das Clínicas of the University of São Paulo.

Hepatitis C and kidney transplant: The eradication time of the virus has arrived

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a factor that reduces the survival of the patient and the graft in renal transplant (RT). The availability of directly acting antivirals agents (DAAs), very effective and with an excellent safety profile, it allows eradicate HCV from patients with kidney disease, and this is a revolutionary radical change in the natural evolution of this infection, until now without effective and safe treatment for the contraindication use of interferon in kidney transplant patients. The efficiency of some DAAs for all genotypes, even in patients with renal insufficiency constitutes a huge contribution to eradicate HCV in the RT population independently the genotype, severity of kidney failure, progression of liver disease and previous anti HCV therapy. All this is raising, although with controversies, the possibility of use kidneys from infected HCV+ donors for transplant in uninfected receptors and can be treated successfully in the early post-TR, thus increasing the total "pool" of kidneys for RT.

HCV-Associated Nephropathies in the Era of Direct Acting Antiviral Agents

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a systemic disorder that frequently associates with extrahepatic manifestations, including nephropathies. Cryoglobulinemia is a typical extrahepatic manifestation of HCV infection that often involves kidneys with a histological pattern of membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. Other, less common renal diseases related to HCV infection include membranous nephropathy, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, IgA nephropathy, fibrillary and immunotactoid glomerulopathy. Over the last decades, the advent of direct-acting antiviral therapies has revolutionized treatment of HCV infection, dramatically increasing the rates of viral clearance. In patients where antiviral therapy alone fails to induce renal disease remission add-on B-cell depleting agents represent an alternative to counteract the synthesis of pathogenic antibodies. Immunosuppressive therapies, such as steroids, alkylating agents, and plasma exchanges, may still represent an effective option to inhibit immune-complex driven inflammatory response, but the potentially associated increase of HCV replication and worsening of liver disease represent a serious limitation to their use.

Projected impact of elbasvir/grazoprevir in patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 and chronic kidney disease in Vietnam

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The objective of this study was to predict the impact of EBR/GZR on the incidence of liver and kidney related complications compared with no treatment (NoTx) and pegylated interferon plus ribavirin (pegIFN/RBV) in patients with CKD stage 4/5 in Vietnam.

METHODS

We developed a mathematical model of the natural history of chronic HCV, CKD, and liver disease. Efficacy of EBR/GZR and pegIFN/RBV were derived from the C-SURFER trial and a meta-analysis, respectively. We calculated lifetime cumulative morbidity and mortality rates, including incidence of decompensated cirrhosis (DC), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and life expectancy.

RESULTS

Estimated lifetime incidence of DC was significantly reduced in patients receiving EBR/GZR (3.47%) compared to NoTx (18.14%) and pegIFN/RBV (9.01%). Estimated incidence of HCC was 1.02%, 21.64%, and 8.90%, and 1.02% in patients receiving EBR/GZR, NoTx, and pegIFN/RBV. EBR/GZR was estimated to extend life expectancy by 4.2 and 2.0 years compared with NoTx and pegIFN/RBV.

CONCLUSIONS

Our model predicted that EBR/GZR will significantly reduce the incidence of liver-related complications and prolong life in patients with chronic HCV GT1 infection and CKD compared with NoTx or pegIFN/RBV.

ESRD patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus and Hepatitis C: Outcomes and management challenges

HIV infection is a major public health problem worldwide. Due to shared modes of acquisition, many HIV+ patients are coinfected with Hepatitis C. HIV/HCV coinfected patients have an increased burden of chronic kidney disease and are more likely to progress to end-stage renal disease. Dialysis survival is diminished in the coinfected population, even in the contemporary era. Kidney transplantation offers a survival benefit over remaining on dialysis; however, posttransplant outcomes are inferior compared to patients with HIV infection alone. Direct acting antiviral agents may offer an opportunity to improve patient survival, but there are significant drug-drug interactions involving the direct acting antiviral agents, antiretroviral therapy, and immunosuppression that the clinician should be aware of.

Impact of cold ischemia time on the outcomes of kidneys with Kidney Donor Profile Index ≥85%: mate kidney analysis - a retrospective study

The new kidney allocation system recommends local and regional sharing of deceased donor kidneys (DDK) with 86-100% Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) to minimize discard. Regional sharing can increase cold ischemia time (CIT) which may negatively impact transplant outcomes. Using a same donor mate kidney model, we aimed to define a CIT that should be targeted to optimize outcomes. Using Organ Procurement and Transplant Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database, we identified recipients of DDK from 2000 to 2013 with ≥85% KDPI. From this cohort, three groups of mate kidney recipients were identified based on CIT: group 1 (≥24 vs. ≥12 to <24 h), group 2 (≥24 vs. <12 h), and group 3 (≥12 to <24 vs. <12 h). Adjusted delayed graft function (DGF), and graft and patient survivals were compared for mate kidneys. DGF risk was significantly lower for patients with CIT <12 vs. ≥24 h in group 2 (adjusted OR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.12-0.57, P < 0.001) while trending lower for CIT ≥12 to <24 vs. ≥24 h in group 1 (adjusted OR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.59-1.03, P = 0.08) and CIT <12 vs. ≥12 to <24 h in group 3 (adjusted OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.55-1.0, P = 0.05). Adjusted graft and patient survivals were similar between mate kidneys in all groups. Minimizing CIT improves outcomes with regional sharing of marginal kidneys.

Impact of Protease Inhibitor-Based Anti-Retroviral Therapy on Outcomes for HIV+ Kidney Transplant Recipients

Excellent outcomes have been demonstrated among select HIV-positive kidney transplant (KT) recipients with well-controlled infection, but to date, no national study has explored outcomes among HIV+ KT recipients by antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimen. Intercontinental Marketing Services (IMS) pharmacy fills (1/1/01-10/1/12) were linked with Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) data. A total of 332 recipients with pre- and posttransplantation fills were characterized by ART at the time of transplantation as protease inhibitor (PI) or non-PI-based ART (88 PI vs. 244 non-PI). Cox proportional hazards models were adjusted for recipient and donor characteristics. Comparing recipients by ART regimen, there were no significant differences in age, race, or HCV status. Recipients on PI-based regimens were significantly more likely to have an Estimated Post Transplant Survival (EPTS) score of >20% (70.9% vs. 56.3%, p = 0.02) than those on non-PI regimens. On adjusted analyses, PI-based regimens were associated with a 1.8-fold increased risk of allograft loss (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22-2.77, p = 0.003), with the greatest risk observed in the first posttransplantation year (aHR 4.48, 95% CI 1.75-11.48, p = 0.002), and a 1.9-fold increased risk of death as compared to non-PI regimens (aHR 1.91, 95% CI 1.02-3.59, p = 0.05). These results suggest that whenever possible, recipients should be converted to a non-PI regimen prior to kidney transplantation.

Eight Weeks of Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Hepatitis C Genotype 1 Infection

Short treatment duration of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) has been successfully used to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection in treatment-naive noncirrhotic patients with viral loads (VLs) under 6 million IU/mL. However, this short duration has not been studied in renal transplant recipients (RTRs), a patient population on lifelong immunosuppression. Here, we describe 3 RTRs who received 8 weeks of LDV/SOF, meeting the standard criteria for shortened treatment duration. All 3 patients tolerated treatment well and achieved sustained virologic response at 12 weeks (SVR 12).

Depleting Antibody Induction and Kidney Transplant Outcomes: A Paired Kidney Analysis

BACKGROUND

Induction immunosuppression decreases the risk for acute rejection and improves graft outcomes in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). We aimed to compare the outcomes of induction with Thymoglobulin and alemtuzumab in KTRs through paired-kidney analysis.

METHODS

Using Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database from 2003 to 2013, we identified recipients of deceased donor kidneys from the same donor in such a way that 1 patient received Thymoglobulin induction and recipient of the mate kidney underwent alemtuzumab induction. All patients were discharged on maintenance immunosuppression with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil with/without steroids. Outcomes were compared between the groups in an adjusted model.

RESULTS

Study cohort included 1149 patients each in alemtuzumab and Thymoglobulin groups. Incidence of delayed graft function (25.8% vs 28.6%, P = 0.12), and 1-year rejection (5.7% vs 4.5%, P = 0.97) were similar for alemtuzumab versus Thymoglobulin groups. Adjusted overall graft (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-1.48; P = 0.52) and patient (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-1.05) survivals were also similar for alemtuzumab versus Thymoglobulin groups. Median hospital length of stay was significantly shorter in alemtuzumab group (4 days vs 5 days, P < 0.001). Similar findings were observed in a subgroup of high immune risk patients. There was evidence for clustering of alemtuzumab use within transplant centers which did not impact long-term outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Depleting antibody induction therapy with alemtuzumab and Thymoglobulin appear equally effective in deceased donor KTRs maintained on tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil-based regimen along with steroid. Alemtuzumab induction is beneficial in reducing hospital length of stay.

Cost-effectiveness of elbasvir/grazoprevir use in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection and chronic kidney disease in the United States

Among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) in the United States, HCV infection causes significant morbidity and mortality and results in substantial healthcare costs. A once-daily oral regimen of elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) for 12 weeks was found to be a safe and efficacious treatment for HCV in patients with CKD. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of EBR/GZR in treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced CKD patients compared with no treatment (NoTx) and pegylated interferon plus ribavirin (peg-IFN/RBV) using a computer-based model of the natural history of chronic HCV genotype 1 infection, CKD and liver disease. Data on baseline characteristics of the simulated patients were obtained from NHANES, 2000-2010. Model inputs were estimated from published studies. Cost of treatment with EBR/GZR and peg-INF/RBV were based on wholesale acquisition cost. All costs were from a third-party payer perspective and were expressed in 2015 U.S. dollars. We estimated lifetime incidence of liver-related complications, liver transplantation, kidney transplantation, end-stage live disease mortality and end-stage renal disease mortality; lifetime quality-adjusted life years (QALY); and incremental cost-utility ratios (ICUR). The model predicted that EBR/GZR will significantly reduce the incidence of liver-related complications and prolong life in patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection and CKD compared with NoTx or use of peg-IFN/RBV. EBR/GZR-based regimens resulted in higher average remaining QALYs and higher costs (11.5716, $191 242) compared with NoTx (8.9199, $156 236) or peg-INF/RBV (10.2857, $186 701). Peg-IFN/RBV is not cost-effective, and the ICUR of EBR/GZR compared with NoTx was $13 200/QALY. Treatment of a patient on haemodialysis with EBR/GZR resulted in a higher ICUR ($217 000/QALY). Assuming a threshold of $100 000 per QALY gained for cost-effectiveness, use of elbasvir/grazoprevir to treat an average patient with CKD can be considered cost-effective in the United States.

Increased Mortality and Graft Loss With Kidney Retransplantation Among Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-Infected Recipients

Excellent outcomes have been demonstrated in primary human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive (HIV+) kidney transplant recipients, but a subset will lose their graft and seek retransplantation (re-KT). To date, no study has examined outcomes among HIV+ re-KT recipients. We studied risk for death and graft loss among 4149 (22 HIV+ vs. 4127 HIV-negative [HIV-]) adult re-KT recipients reported to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) (2004-2013). Compared to HIV- re-KT recipients, HIV+ re-KT recipients were more commonly African American (63.6% vs. 26.7%, p < 0.001), infected with hepatitis C (31.8% vs. 5.0%, p < 0.001) and had longer median time on dialysis (4.8 years vs. 2.1 years, p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in length of time between the primary and re-KT events by HIV status (1.5 years vs. 1.4 years, p = 0.52). HIV+ re-KT recipients experienced a 3.11-fold increased risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 3.11, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.82-5.34, p < 0.001) and a 1.96-fold increased risk of graft loss (aHR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.14-3.36, p = 0.01) compared to HIV- re-KT recipients. Re-KT among HIV+ recipients was associated with increased risk for mortality and graft loss. Future research is needed to determine if a survival benefit is achieved with re-KT in this vulnerable population.

Kidney transplantation for HIV-positive patients

HIV+ patients are at increased risk for end-stage renal disease, but HIV infection was once considered a contraindication to renal transplantation. However, contemporary studies from the United States and Europe have now demonstrated that renal transplantation is a safe and effective treatment for end-stage renal disease in HIV patients, with equivalent patient and allograft survival to those uninfected. Broader experience in transplantation in HIV+ patients has identified unique challenges including high rates of acute rejection, delayed graft function, and significant drug-drug interactions. Kidney transplantation in HIV-infected patients is an active area of clinical research and trials of HIV+ to HIV+ transplantation in the United States are underway.

Renal transplantation in human immunodeficiency virus-infected recipients: a case-control study from the Brazilian experience

BACKGROUND

Highly active antiretroviral therapy has turned human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with end-stage renal disease into suitable candidates for renal transplantation. We present the Brazilian experience with kidney transplantation in HIV-infected recipients observed in a multicenter study.

METHODS

HIV-infected kidney transplant recipients and matched controls were evaluated for the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection (AR), infections, graft function, and survival of patients and renal grafts.

RESULTS

Fifty-three HIV-infected recipients and 106 controls were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were similar, but a higher frequency of pre-transplant positivity for hepatitis C virus and cytomegalovirus infections was found in the HIV group. Immunosuppressive regimens did not differ, but a trend was observed toward lower use of anti-thymocyte globulin in the group of HIV-infected recipients (P = 0.079). The HIV-positive recipient group presented a higher incidence of treated AR (P = 0.036) and DGF (P = 0.044). Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration estimated that glomerular filtration rate was similar at 6 months (P = 0.374) and at 12 months (P = 0.957). The median number of infections per patient was higher in the HIV-infected group (P = 0.018). The 1-year patient survival (P < 0.001) and graft survival (P = 0.004) were lower, but acceptable, in the group of HIV-infected patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In the Brazilian experience, despite somewhat inferior outcomes, kidney transplantation is an adequate therapy for selected HIV-infected recipients.

Identification of Optimal Donor-Recipient Combinations Among Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-Positive Kidney Transplant Recipients

For some patient subgroups, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has been associated with worse outcomes after kidney transplantation (KT); potentially modifiable factors may be responsible. The study goal was to identify factors that predict a higher risk of graft loss among HIV-positive KT recipients compared with a similar transplant among HIV-negative recipients. In this study, 82 762 deceased donor KT recipients (HIV positive: 526; HIV negative: 82 236) reported to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) (2001-2013) were studied by interaction term analysis. Compared to HIV-negative recipients, the hepatitis C virus (HCV) amplified risk 2.72-fold among HIV-positive KT recipients (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 2.72, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.75-4.22, p < 0.001). Forty-three percent of the excess risk was attributable to the interaction between HIV and HCV (attributable proportion of risk due to the interaction [AP]: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.23-0.63, p = 0.02). Among HIV-positive recipients with more than three HLA mismatches (MMs), risk was amplified 1.80-fold compared to HIV-negative (aHR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.31-2.47, p < 0.001); 42% of the excess risk was attributable to the interaction between HIV and more than three HLA MMs (AP: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.24-0.60, p = 0.01). High-HIV-risk (HIV-positive/HCV-positive HLAwith more than three MMs) recipients had a 3.86-fold increased risk compared to low-HIV-risk (HIV-positive/HCV-negative HLA with three or fewer MMs)) recipients (aHR: 3.86, 95% CI: 2.37-6.30, p < 0.001). Avoidance of more than three HLA MMs in HIV-positive KT recipients, particularly among coinfected patients, may mitigate the increased risk of graft loss associated with HIV infection.

Efficacy and Safety of Direct Acting Antivirals in Kidney Transplant Recipients with Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection

The prevalence of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection is significantly higher in patients with end-stage renal disease compared to the general population and poses important clinical challenges in patients who undergo kidney transplantation. Historically, interferon-based treatment options have been limited by low rates of efficacy and significant side effects, including risk of precipitating rejection. Limited data exist on the use of all-oral, interferon-free direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapies in kidney transplant recipients. In this study, we performed a retrospective chart review with prospective clinical follow-up of post-kidney transplant patients treated with DAA therapies at three major hospitals in Boston, MA. A total of 24 kidney recipients with HCV infection received all-oral DAA therapy post-transplant. Patients were predominantly male (79%) with a median age of 60 years (range 34-70 years), median creatinine of 1.2 mg/dL (0.66-1.76), and 42% had advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis. The majority had HCV genotype 1a infection (58%). All patients received full-dose sofosbuvir; it was paired with simeprevir (9 patients without and 3 patients with ribavirin), ledipasvir (7 patients without and 1 patient with ribavirin) or ribavirin alone (4 patients). The overall sustained virologic response (SVR12) was 91% (21 out of 23 patients). One patient achieved SVR4 but demised prior to SVR12 check point due to treatment unrelated cause. Two treatment failures were successfully retreated with alternative DAA regimens and achieved SVR. Both initials failures occurred in patients with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis, with genotype 1a infection, and prior HCV treatment failure. Adverse events were reported in 11 patients (46%) and were managed clinically without discontinuation of therapy. Calcineurin inhibitor trough levels did not significantly change during therapy. In this multi-center series of patients, all-oral DAA therapy appears to be safe and effective in post-kidney transplant patients with chronic HCV infection.

Update on kidney transplantation in human immunodeficiency virus infected recipients

Improved survival of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected patients with chronic kidney disease following the introduction of antiretroviral therapy resulted in the need to revisit the topic of kidney transplantation in these patients. Large cohort studies have demonstrated favorable outcomes and proved that transplantation is a viable therapeutic option. However, HIV-infected recipients had higher rates of rejection. Immunosuppressive therapy did not negatively impact the course of HIV infection. Some of the immunosuppressive drugs used following transplantation exhibit antiretroviral effects. A close collaboration between infectious disease specialists and transplant professionals is mandatory in order to optimize transplantation outcomes in these patients. Transplantation from HIV⁺ donors to HIV⁺ recipients has been a subject of intense debate. The HIV Organ Policy Equity act provided a platform to research this area further and to develop guidelines. The first HIV⁺ to HIV⁺ kidney transplant in the United States and the first HIV⁺ to HIV⁺ liver transplant in the world were recently performed at the Johns Hopkins University Medical Center.

A High Comorbidity Score Should Not be a Contraindication for Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Currently, potential kidney transplant patients more often suffer from comorbidities. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was developed in 1987 and is the most used comorbidity score. We questioned to what extent number and severity of comorbidities interfere with graft and patient survival. Besides, we wondered whether the CCI was best to study the influence of comorbidity in kidney transplant patients.

METHODS

In our center, 1728 transplants were performed between 2000 and 2013. There were 0.8% cases with missing values. Nine pretransplant comorbidity covariates were defined: cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular accident, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes mellitus, liver disease, lung disease, malignancy, other organ transplantation, and human immunodeficiency virus positivity. The CCI used was unadjusted for recipient age. The Rotterdam Comorbidity in Kidney Transplantation score was developed, and its influence was compared to the CCI. Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, corrected for variables with a known significant influence, were performed.

RESULTS

We noted 325 graft failures and 215 deaths. The only comorbidity covariate that significantly influenced graft failure censored for death was peripheral vascular disease. Patient death was significantly influenced by cardiovascular disease, other organ transplantation, and the total comorbidity scores. Model fit was best with the Rotterdam Comorbidity in Kidney Transplantation score compared to separate comorbidity covariates and the CCI. In the population with the highest comorbidity score, 50% survived more than 10 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the negative influence of comorbidity, patient survival after transplantation is remarkably good. This means that even patients with extensive comorbidity should be considered for transplantation.

Sofosbuvir and simeprevir in hepatitis C genotype 1-patients with end-stage renal disease on haemodialysis or GFR <30 ml/min

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Treating chronic hepatitis C (CHC) in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has suboptimal tolerability and cure rates. Safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir plus simeprevir regimen in CHC-infected patients with ESRD on haemodialysis (HD) or glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <30 ml/min is unknown. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir and simeprevir in this special patient population.

METHODS

All (n = 17) patients in the analysis had ESRD on HD or GFR <30 ml/min. All received sofosbuvir 400 mg daily and simeprevir 150 mg daily, without ribavirin for 12 weeks. Safety and efficacy data were collected; including SVR4 and SVR12 data for all patients after completing therapy.

RESULTS

In this 17 patient cohort, eight (47%) were cirrhotic, four (24%) had stage three liver fibrosis and 13 (76%) were genotype 1A. All 17 have completed 12 weeks of therapy. Treatment was overall well tolerated with no treatment discontinuations reported. Four (24%) patients reported mild adverse events (AE). These AEs were insomnia (n = 2), headache (n = 1), nausea (n = 1) and worsening anaemia requiring blood transfusion (n = 1). All 17 patients reached post-treatment week-12 follow-up, and achieved SVR12 or virological cure (100% SVR12).

CONCLUSIONS

Daily, full dose of sofosbuvir plus simeprevir for 12 weeks of therapy appears to be well tolerated in patients with ESRD on HD or GFR <30 ml/min. Most common AEs resembled those of healthier CHC patients without significant renal impairment. The cure rates obtained in this cohort treated with sofosbuvir and simeprevir are dramatically superior to any previous treatment regimen studied & published in this special patient population.

Hepatitis C virus infection and kidney transplantation: newer options and a brighter future ahead?

Recent studies including the current article by Sawinski et al. demonstrate that hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with worse outcomes in kidney transplant recipients with and without HIV infection. We comment on the significance of these findings in the context of newer options for the treatment of HCV infection that have improved efficacy and fewer side effects when administered in both kidney transplant candidates and recipients.

Renal Transplantation in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease Patients

Kidney transplantation is the best option for patients with end-stage kidney disease. It is associated with better quality of life, lower medical costs, less hospitalization, and improved survival compared with wait-listed patients who remain on dialysis. Timely referral for transplantation is essential to reap the maximal benefit and should begin in the advanced chronic kidney disease stage prior to starting dialysis. Shortage of donor organs remains the biggest challenge to transplantation. With the improved success of kidney transplantation, candidate acceptance criteria continue to broaden. This article provides an overview of the pretransplantation multidisciplinary evaluation process detailing the factors that determine transplant candidacy.

En Bloc Multivisceral and Kidney Transplantation in an HIV Patient: First Case Report

The continual improvement in outcome with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and visceral transplantation for gut failure stimulated our interest in lifting HIV infection as a contraindication for intestinal and multivisceral transplantation. This report is the first to describe visceral transplantation in a patient with HIV infection. A HAART regimen was introduced in the setting of short-gut syndrome with successful suppression of HIV viral load. The indication for en bloc multivisceral and kidney transplantation was end-stage liver failure with portomesenteric venous thrombosis and chronic renal insufficiency. The underlying hepatic pathology was alcoholic and home parenteral nutrition-associated cirrhosis. Surgery was complicated due to technical difficulties with excessive blood loss and long operative time. The complex posttransplant course included multiple exploratory laparotomies due to serious intra-abdominal and systemic infections. Heavy immunosuppression was required to treat recurrent episodes of severe allograft rejection. Posttransplant oral HAART successfully sustained undetectable viral load. Unfortunately, the patient succumbed to sepsis 3 months posttransplant. With new insights into the biology of gut immunity, mechanisms of allograft tolerance, and HIV-associated immune dysregulation, successful outcome is anticipated, particularly in patients who are in need of isolated intestinal and less-organ-contained visceral allografts.

HCV infection is associated with lower survival in simultaneous liver kidney transplant recipients in the United States

BACKGROUND

The frequency of simultaneous liver kidney transplantation (SLKT) has been increasing over the past decade. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the most common indication for liver transplantation in the United States. Given the rising prevalence of HCV-related SLKT, it is important to understand the impact of HCV in this patient population.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the United Network for Organ Sharing registry to assess adult patients undergoing SLKT in the United States from 2003 to 2012. Patient survival following SLKT was assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Patients infected with non-HCV have significantly lower survival following SLKT compared to non-HCV patients at three (three-yr survival: 71.0% vs. 78.9%, p < 0.01) and five yr (five-yr survival: 61.4% vs. 72.5%, p < 0.01). The results of multivariate regression analyses demonstrated that patients infected with HCV had significantly lower survival following SLKT than patients with non-HCV disease (HR 1.41, 95% CI, 1.19-1.67, p < 0.001). In addition, lower post-SLKT survival was noted among patients with diabetes (HR 1.34, 95% CI, 1.13-1.58, p < 0.001) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HR 1.60, 95% CI, 1.17-2.18, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatitis C infection is associated with lower patient survival following SLKT.

Advances in hepatitis C therapies

INTRODUCTION

The recent development of new direct acting antivirals constitutes a clinical revolution in the field of hepatitis C therapy. Different drugs with direct antiviral effects and very high potency have been developed, changing the current scenario and prognosis of hepatitis C-related liver disease. This review aims to clarify the current stage of the different antiviral strategies in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection by analyzing the specific efficacy of each combination.

AREAS COVERED

Data have been extracted from the most important published clinical trials, cumulative real-world experience reports and data from the most relevant studies presented in the last international meetings (European and American International Liver Congresses). In addition, data from the recently updated international guidelines have also been included.

EXPERT OPINION

Although there are many differences in health-care budgets among countries in the world which will surely compromise drug availability and treatment decisions, this review aims to give a general and brief recommendation to help treating physicians to choose the best option to treat hepatitis C.

Superior outcomes in HIV-positive kidney transplant patients compared with HCV-infected or HIV/HCV-coinfected recipients

The prerequisite for an 'undetectable' HIV viral load has restricted access to transplantation for HIV-infected kidney recipients. However, HCV-infected recipients, owing to the historic limitations of HCV therapy in patients with renal disease, are commonly viremic at transplant and have universal access. To compare the effect of HIV, HCV, and HIV/HCV coinfection on kidney transplant patient and allograft outcomes, we performed a retrospective study of kidney recipients transplanted from January 1996 through December 2013. In multivariable analysis, patient (hazard ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.66-1.24) and allograft survival (0.60, 40-0.88) in 492 HIV patients did not differ significantly from the 117,791 patient-uninfected reference group. This was superior to outcomes in both the 5605 patient HCV group for death (1.44, 1.33-1.56) and graft loss (1.43, 1.31-1.56), as well as the 147 patient HIV/HCV coinfected group for death (2.26, 1.45-3.52) and graft loss (2.59, 1.60-4.19). HIV infection did not adversely affect recipient or allograft survival and was associated with superior outcomes compared with both HCV infection and HIV/HCV coinfection in this population. Thus, pretransplant viral eradication and/or immediate posttransplant eradication should be studied as potential strategies to improve posttransplant outcomes in HCV-infected kidney recipients.