Inflammation Causes Resistance to Anti-CD20-Mediated B Cell Depletion

A Novel Class of On-Treatment Cancer Immunotherapy Biomarker: Trough Levels of Antibody Therapeutics in Peripheral Blood

While immune checkpoint blockade has revolutionized cancer treatment, unfortunately most patients do not benefit from this treatment. Many pharmacodynamic (PD) studies have revealed essential requirements for successful cancer immunotherapy that may provide insight into how we can improve these agents. Despite enormous efforts focused on interrogating the immune system using different biospecimens (e.g. blood, primary tumor, metastatic tumor, microbiome samples), a variety of technologies (e.g. flow cytometry, bulk and single-cell RNA-sequencing, immunohistochemistry), and wide-ranging disciplines (e.g. pathology, genomics, bioinformatics, immunology, cancer biology, metabolomics, bacteriology), discovery of consistent biomarkers of response have remained elusive. Pharmacokinetics (PK) studies, however, not only provide critical information regarding safe dosing but may also reveal useful biomarkers. For example, recent studies found that trough levels of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) or clearance (CL) of them were associated with clinical outcome, which suggests that trough levels of mAbs may represent a new class of on-treatment cancer immunotherapy biomarker. In this review, we summarize the potential utility of trough levels of mAbs, the mechanism of varying PK, consideration for therapeutic drug monitoring, and assay attributes that will facilitate wider utilization of PK information in conjunction with PD assessments.

Antibody-mediated rejection: prevention, monitoring and treatment dilemmas

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has emerged as the leading cause of late graft loss in kidney transplant recipients. Donor-specific antibodies are an independent risk factor for AMR and graft loss. However, not all donor-specific antibodies are pathogenic. AMR treatment is heterogeneous due to the lack of robust trials to support clinical decisions. This review provides an overview and comments on practical but relevant dilemmas physicians experience in managing kidney transplant recipients with AMR.

RECENT FINDINGS

Active AMR with donor-specific antibodies may be treated with plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin and corticosteroids with additional therapies considered on a case-by-case basis. On the contrary, no treatment has been shown to be effective against chronic active AMR. Various biomarkers and prediction models to assess the individual risk of graft failure and response to rejection treatment show promise.

SUMMARY

The ability to personalize management for a given kidney transplant recipient and identify treatments that will improve their long-term outcome remains a critical unmet need. Earlier identification of AMR with noninvasive biomarkers and prediction models to assess the individual risk of graft failure should be considered. Enrolling patients with AMR in clinical trials to assess novel therapeutic agents is highly encouraged.

Investigational drugs for the treatment of kidney transplant rejection

INTRODUCTION

Kidney transplant rejection remains an important clinical problem despite the development of effective immunosuppressive drug combination therapy. Two major types of rejection are recognized, namely T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), which have a different pathophysiology and are treated differently. Unfortunately, long-term outcomes of both TCMR and ABMR remain unsatisfactory despite current therapy. Hence, alternative therapeutic drugs are urgently needed.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers novel and investigational drugs for the pharmacological treatment of kidney transplant rejection. Potential therapeutic strategies and future directions are discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

The development of alternative pharmacologic treatment of rejection has focused mostly on ABMR, since this is the leading cause of kidney allograft loss and currently lacks an effective, evidence-based therapy. At present, there is insufficient high-quality evidence for any of the covered investigational drugs to support their use in ABMR. However, with the emergence of targeted therapies, this potential arises for individualized treatment strategies. In order to generate more high-quality evidence for such strategies and overcome the obstacles of classic, randomized, controlled trials, we advocate the implementation of adaptive trial designs and surrogate clinical endpoints. We believe such adaptive trial designs could help to understand the risks and benefits of promising drugs such as tocilizumab, clazakizumab, belimumab, and imlifidase.

Trough levels of ipilimumab in serum as a potential biomarker of clinical outcomes for patients with advanced melanoma after treatment with ipilimumab

Background

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) using anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 has revolutionized the treatment of advanced cancer. However, ICB is effective for only a small fraction of patients, and biomarkers such as expression of PD-L1 in tumor or serum levels of CXCL11 have suboptimal sensitivity and specificity. Exposure–response (E-R) relationships have been observed with other therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. There are many factors influencing E-R relationships, yet several studies have shown that trough levels of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 correlated with clinical outcomes. However, the potential utility of anti-CTLA-4 levels as a biomarker remains unknown.

Methods

Serum was obtained at trough levels at weeks 7 and 12 (after doses 2 and 4) from patients with advanced melanoma who received ipilimumab alone (3 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four treatments) via an expanded access program (NCT00495066). We have successfully established a proteomics assay to measure the concentration of ipilimumab in serum using an liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry-based nanosurface and molecular-orientation limited proteolysis (nSMOL) approach. Serum samples from 38 patients were assessed for trough levels of ipilimumab by the nSMOL assay.

Results

We found that trough levels of ipilimumab were higher in patients who developed immune-related adverse events but did not differ based on the presence or absence of disease progression. We found that patients with higher trough levels of ipilimumab had better overall survival when grouped based on ipilimumab trough levels. Trough levels of ipilimumab were inversely associated with pretreatment serum levels of CXCL11, a predictive biomarker we previously identified, and soluble CD25 (sCD25), a prognostic biomarker for advanced melanoma, as well as C reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin (IL)-6 levels at week 7.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that trough levels of ipilimumab may be a useful biomarker for the long-term survival of patients with advanced melanoma treated with ipilimumab. The association of ipilimumab trough levels with pretreatment serum levels of CXCL11 and sCD25 is suggestive of a baseline-driven E-R relationship, and the association of ipilimumab trough levels with on-treatment levels of CRP and IL-6 is suggestive of response-driven E-R relationship. Our findings highlight the potential utility of trough levels of ipilimumab as a biomarker.

Trial registration number

NCT00495066.

The potential impact of timing of IVIG administration on the efficacy of rituximab for immune tolerance induction for patients with Pompe disease

Immune modulation with rituximab, methotrexate, and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has shown great success in inducing immune tolerance in a large cohort of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT)-naïve infantile Pompe disease patients. Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, the principal mechanism by which rituximab depletes B-cells, requires CD20 binding by Fab'2 of rituximab on B-cells and the concomitant binding of its Fc region to Fc receptors on effector cells or to complement. To protect patients against microbial infections when using rituximab, IVIG was added to the immunomodulation regimen used in Pompe disease. Administration of IVIG can saturate neonatal Fc receptors (FcRn), which recycle endogenous as well as administered polyclonal/monoclonal antibodies via the binding of the Fc moiety to FcRn. As such, the administration of IVIG prior to rituximab, a chimeric mouse-human monoclonal antibody, may sharply reduce the half-life of rituximab and in turn, its efficacy. Based on this understanding, it is vital to understand the optimal timing of IVIG administration in relation to rituximab administration for the purposes of inducing immune tolerance.

A B cell-dependent pathway drives chronic lung allograft rejection after ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) limits long-term survival after lung transplant (LT). Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) promotes chronic rejection (CR) and CLAD, but the underlying mechanisms are not well understood. To examine mechanisms linking IRI to CR, a mouse orthotopic LT model using a minor alloantigen strain mismatch (C57BL/10 [B10, H-2^b ] → C57BL/6 [B6, H-2^b ]) and isograft controls (B6→B6) was used with antecedent minimal or prolonged graft storage. The latter resulted in IRI with subsequent airway and parenchymal fibrosis in prolonged storage allografts but not isografts. This pattern of CR after IRI was associated with the formation of B cell-rich tertiary lymphoid organs within the grafts and circulating autoantibodies. These processes were attenuated by B cell depletion, despite preservation of allograft T cell content. Our observations suggest that IRI may promote B cell recruitment that drives CR after LT. These observations have implications for the mechanisms leading to CLAD after LT.

Outstanding questions in transplantation: B cells, alloantibodies, and humoral rejection

Over the past three decades, improved immunosuppression has significantly reduced T cell-mediated acute rejection rates, but long-term graft survival rates have seen only marginal improvement. The cause of late graft loss has been under intense investigation, and chronic antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has been identified as one of the leading causes, thus providing a strong rationale for basic science investigation into donor-specific B cells and antibodies in transplantation and ways to mitigate their pathogenicity. In 2018, the American Society of Transplantation launched a community-wide online discussion of Outstanding Questions in Transplantation, and the topic of B cell biology and donor-specific antibody prevention emerged as a major area of interest to the community, leading to a highly engaged dialogue, with comments from basic and translational scientists as well as physicians (http://community.myast.org/communities/community-home/digestviewer). We have summarized this discussion from a bedside to bench perspective and have organized this review into outstanding questions within the paradigm that AMR is a leading cause of graft loss in the clinic, and points of view that challenge aspects of this paradigm. We also highlight opportunities for basic and translational scientists to contribute to the resolution of these questions, mapping important future directions for the transplant research field.

The long and the short of it: insights into the cellular source of autoantibodies as revealed by B cell depletion therapy

High titers of pathogenic autoantibodies are a hallmark of many autoimmune diseases. However, much remains unknown about the self-reactive plasma cells that are key mediators of disease. We propose a model in which the varying efficacy of precursor B cell depletion for the treatment of humoral autoimmunity can be explained by differences in the relative contributions of pathogenic antibodies by short-lived versus long-lived plasma cells. Beyond therapeutic considerations, this model suggests that we can infer the cellular source of disease-associated autoantibodies by the durability of serum titers following B cell depletion. Data from clinical trials and animal models across different autoimmune diseases may provide useful insights into the lifespan, lifestyle and fate of autoreactive plasma cells.

Donor IL-6 deficiency evidently reduces memory T cell responses in sensitized transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Resistance of tolerance induction in sensitized transplantation is mainly caused by generation of memory T cells. It is unknown whether alteration of graft niche such as level of pro-inflammatory cytokines can affect generation of memory T cells.

METHODS

IL-6 deficient or wild-type (WT) C57BL/6 heart grafts were transplanted into pre-sensitized wild-type BALB/c recipients. Frequencies of memory T cells in the peripheral blood, grafts, and spleen were evaluated.

RESULTS

We revealed that deficiency of donor IL-6 could significant prolong sensitized allograft survival. Compared with counterpart of WT group, frequency of effector memory CD4 + T cells (CD4 + CD44 + CD62L-) in the peripheral blood was significantly lower in the IL-6 KO group (p = .026) at day 3 post-transplantation. Frequency of effector memory CD8 + T cells (CD8 + CD44 + CD62L-) in the peripheral blood was significantly lower in the IL-6 KO group (p < .0001) at day 3 post-transplant in comparison to that of WT group. No significant difference of central memory T cells was found between these groups. Histology demonstrated that deficiency of donor pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 (IL-6 KO group) preserved cardiac architecture with a mild infiltration of lymphocytes, whereas wild-type donor (control group) caused an evident lymphocytic infiltration within myocardial fibers of grafts and destruction of cardiac structure.

CONCLUSION

Deficiency of pro-inflammatory IL-6 of donor graft could effectively prolong sensitized allograft survival, which was caused by a remarkable decrease of peripheral memory T cells rather than central memory T cells. This unveiled mechanism of targeting IL-6 signaling pathway might provide a novel insight into preventing allograft rejection for sensitized transplant recipients.

Current status of alloimmunity

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The present review aims to highlight the major recent advances in transplantation with regards to basic, translational, and clinical research.

RECENT FINDINGS

We describe new concepts in understanding allorecognition and allospecificity of T cells, and discuss current challenges in targeting memory T cells, including the limitation of rodent disease models. From a clinical perspective, we highlight the advances in molecular biopsy characterization, which have expanded our knowledge of potential drivers of injury and may provide better parameters for patient risk stratification. We also highlight the dual role of innate immunity in both stimulating and regulating adaptive immunity, as well as novel insights into environmental exposures that may affect immune regulation, such as high-salt diet. Finally, we discuss advances in understanding humoral response and novel technologies, such as chimeric antigen receptors-engineered T cells, microparticle-based drug delivery, and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR associated protein 9 (Cas9) gene editing, that may provide intriguing and promising approaches to restrain alloimmunity.

SUMMARY

Current advances in our understanding of the basic mechanisms of alloimmunity and their potential translation to clinical applications will permit the development of novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies to improve long-term graft survival.

Plasma cell survival in the absence of B cell memory

Pre-existing serum antibodies play an important role in vaccine-mediated protection against infection but the underlying mechanisms of immune memory are unclear. Clinical studies indicate that antigen-specific antibody responses can be maintained for many years, leading to theories that reactivation/differentiation of memory B cells into plasma cells is required to sustain long-term antibody production. Here, we present a decade-long study in which we demonstrate site-specific survival of bone marrow-derived plasma cells and durable antibody responses to multiple virus and vaccine antigens in rhesus macaques for years after sustained memory B cell depletion. Moreover, BrdU⁺ cells with plasma cell morphology can be detected for 10 years after vaccination/BrdU administration, indicating that plasma cells may persist for a prolonged period of time in the absence of cell division. On the basis of these results, long-lived plasma cells represent a key cell population responsible for long-term antibody production and serological memory.

The long-term maintenance of antibody-secreting plasma cells and the requirement for memory B cells are unclear. Here, the authors show that plasma cells and the antibodies secreted are long-lived and maintained over a decade in the absence of memory B cells in non-human primates.

Use of polyclonal/monoclonal antibody therapies in transplantation

INTRODUCTION

For over thirty years, antibody (mAb)-based therapies have been a standard component of transplant immunosuppression, and yet much remains to be learned in order for us to truly harness their therapeutic capabilities. Current mAbs used in transplant directly target and destroy graft-destructive immune cells, interrupt cytokine and costimulation-dependent T and B cell activation, and prevent down-stream complement activation. Areas covered: This review summarizes our current approaches to using antibody-based therapies to prevent and treat allograft rejection. It also provides examples of promising novel mAb therapies, and discusses the potential for future mAb development in transplantation. Expert opinion: The broad capability of antibodies, in parallel with our growing ability to synthetically modulate them, offers exciting opportunities to develop better biologic therapeutics. In order to do so, we must further our understanding about the basic biology underlying allograft rejection, and gain better appreciation of how characteristics of therapeutic antibodies affect their efficacy.