Breast Cancer and Transplantation

Cancer mortality after kidney transplantation: A multicenter cohort study in Italy

Kidney transplant (KT) recipients are known to be at risk of developing several cancer types; however, cancer mortality in this population is underinvestigated. Our study aimed to assess the risk of cancer death among Italian KT recipients compared to the corresponding general population. A cohort study was conducted among 7373 individuals who underwent KT between 2003 and 2020 in 17 Italian centers. Date and cause of death were retrieved until 31 December 2020. Indirect standardization was used to estimate standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Cancer was the most common cause of death among the 7373 KT recipients, constituting 32.4% of all deaths. A 1.8-fold excess mortality (95% CI: 1.59-2.09) was observed for all cancers combined. Lymphomas (SMR = 6.17, 95% CI: 3.81-9.25), kidney cancer (SMR = 5.44, 95% CI: 2.97-8.88) and skin melanoma (SMR = 3.19, 95% CI: 1.03-6.98) showed the highest excess death risks. In addition, SMRs were increased about 1.6 to 3.0 times for cancers of lung, breast, bladder and other hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. As compared to the general population, relative cancer mortality risk remained significantly elevated in all age groups though it decreased with increasing age. A linear temporal increase in SMR over time was documented for all cancers combined (P < .01). Our study documented significantly higher risks of cancer death in KT recipients than in the corresponding general population. Such results support further investigation into the prevention and early detection of cancer in KT recipients.

More than four decades of graft survival in pediatric kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Early in the history of kidney transplantation, short-term graft survival was low. Yet some have had excellent long-term survival. Herein, we describe characteristics of pediatric recipients with > 40 years of graft survival currently alive with a functioning first graft.

METHODS

We reviewed all pediatric (age < 18 years) kidney transplants performed at the University of Minnesota between January 1, 1970, and December 31, 1979 (n = 148), to identify all recipients currently alive with a functioning first graft. Data are presented as medians with interquartile ranges (IQR) and proportions.

RESULTS

We identified 10 recipients with > 40-year graft survival (median follow-up: 45.0 years (IQR: 43.1, 48.1)). The median age at transplant was 13.8 years (IQR: 5.1, 16.3). All recipients were white; half were male. Of the 10, 4 had glomerulonephritis, 2 had congenital anomalies of the kidney and the urinary tract, 2 had congenital nephrotic syndrome, 1 had Alport syndrome, and 1 had cystic kidney disease as kidney failure cause. Nine patients received a living-related donor transplant, and 1 patient received a deceased-donor transplant. The median estimated glomerular filtration rate at 20 years post-transplant was 79.9 (IQR: 72.3, 98.4); at 30 years, 67.7 (IQR: 63.2, 91.8); and at 40 years, 80.3 ml/min/1.73 m2 (IQR: 73.7, 86.0). None developed rejection, 5 developed hypertension, 2 developed dyslipidemia, 1 developed diabetes, and 7 patients developed malignancy (4 skin cancer, 2 breast cancer, and 1 post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease).

CONCLUSION

Pediatric kidney transplant recipients may achieve > 4 decades of graft survival. Cancer is a common complication warranting vigilant screening.

Malignancies in adult kidney transplant candidates and recipients: current status

Posttransplant malignancies, particularly recurrent and de novo, in solid organs including kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are a significant complication associated with substantial mortality, largely attributed to long-term immunosuppression necessary to maintain allograft tolerance. Older age at transplantation and oncogenic virus infection along with pretransplant malignancies are among the main factors contributing to the risk of cancer in this population. As the mean age of transplant candidates rises, the rate of transplant recipients with pretransplant malignancies also increases. The eligibility criteria for transplantation in patients with prior cancer have recently changed. The overall risk of posttransplant malignancies is at least double after transplantation including KTRs relative to the general population, most pronounced for skin cancers associated with UV radiation and virally-mediated tumors. The risk of renal cell carcinoma is specifically increased in the kidney transplant population. The therapy of cancer in transplant patients is associated with risk of higher toxicity, and graft rejection and/or impairment, which poses a unique challenge in the management. Reduction of immunosuppression and the use of mTOR inhibitors are common after cancer diagnosis, although optimal immunosuppression for transplant recipients with cancer remains undefined. Suboptimal cancer treatment contributing to a worse prognosis has been reported for malignancies in this population. In this article, we focus on the prevalence and outcomes of posttransplant malignancies, cancer therapy including a short overview of immunotherapy, cancer screening and prevention strategies, and immunosuppression as a cancer risk factor. The 2020/2021 recommendations of the Kidney Diseases Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO) and American Society of Transplantation (AST) for transplant candidates with a history of cancer are presented.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with a hematologic malignancy and a prior history of breast cancer

PURPOSE

To compare the outcome of allogeneic stem cell transplantation for myeloid malignancies in breast cancer survivors to a contemporaneous control group.

METHODS

Medical records of all patients with a history of breast cancer who received allogeneic stem cell transplants at a single, tertiary referral Comprehensive Cancer Center between 2002 and 2019 were reviewed. Transplant outcomes were compared to 289 control patients without a history of breast cancer from the same time period. Main outcomes included survival, disease-free survival, non-relapse mortality, relapse or progression of hematologic malignancy, and incidence of recurrent breast cancer after hematopoietic cell transplantation. Comparisons between women with a history of breast cancer and controls utilized propensity score weighting to balance patient characteristics.

RESULTS

Forty women, ages 30-74 years, with a history of breast cancer received an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant for a hematologic malignancy between December 2002 and February 2019. Twelve of the 40 patients are alive with a median survival of 7.4 years (range, 1.9-16.8 years). None of the patients had evidence of recurrent breast cancer prior to death or date of last contact. In multivariable Cox models, all transplant outcomes were similar between the patients and the control group with hematopoietic cell transplant comorbidity score as the most important confounding factor for adjustment in these models.

CONCLUSION

A history of treated breast cancer should not exclude patients from consideration for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Liver transplantation does not increase morbidity or mortality in women undergoing surgery for breast cancer

Purpose:

The incidence of breast cancer following solid organ transplantation is comparable to the age-matched general population. The rate of de novo breast cancer following liver transplantation varies. Furthermore, there is limited information on the management and outcomes of breast cancer in liver transplant recipients. We aim to evaluate the impact of liver transplantation on breast cancer surgery outcomes and compare the outcomes after breast cancer surgery in liver transplant recipient in transplant versus non-transplant centers.

Methods:

National Inpatient Sample database was accessed to identify liver transplant recipient with breast cancer. Mortality, complications, hospital charges, and total length of stay were evaluated with multivariate logistic regression testing. Weighted multivariate regression models were employed to compare outcomes at transplant and non-transplant centers.

Results:

Ninety-nine women met inclusion criteria for liver transplantation + breast cancer and were compared against women with breast cancer without liver transplantation (n = 736,527). Liver transplantation + breast cancer had lower performance status as confirmed via higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (20.5% vs 10.2%, p < 0001). There were significantly more complications in the liver transplantation cohort when compared to the non-liver transplant recipient (15.0% vs 8.2%, p = 0.012). However, on multivariate analysis, liver transplantation was not an independent risk factor for post-operative complications following breast cancer surgery (odd ratio, 1.223, p = 0.480). Cost associated with breast cancer care was significantly higher in those with liver transplantation (2.621, p < 0.001). Breast conservation surgery in liver transplantation had shorter length of stay as compared to breast cancer alone (odds ratio, 0.568, p = 0.027) in all hospitals.

Conclusion:

Liver transplantation does not increase short-term mortality when undergoing breast cancer surgery. Although there were significantly more complications in the liver transplantation cohort when compared to the non-liver transplant recipient (15.0% vs 8.2%, p = 0.012), on multivariate analysis, liver transplantation was not an independent risk factor for postoperative complications following breast cancer surgery. Breast cancer management in liver transplant recipient at non-transplant centers incurred higher charges but no difference in complication rate or length of stay when compared to transplant centers.

Malignancy: An Adverse Effect of Immunosuppression

Benefits of solid organ transplantation in end stage organ diseases are indisputable. Malignancy is a feared complication of solid organ transplantation and is a leading cause of mortality in patients with organ transplantation. Iatrogenic immunosuppression to prevent graft rejection plays a crucial role in the cancer development in solid organ transplant recipients. Chronic exposure to immunosuppression increases the malignancy burden through deregulation of host immune defense mechanisms and unchecked proliferation of oncogenic viruses and malignancies associated with these viruses. Vigorous screening of candidates undergoing transplant evaluation for malignancies, careful assessment of donors, and vigilant monitoring of transplant recipients are necessary to prevent, detect, and manage this life-threatening complication.

A world-wide survey on kidney transplantation practices in breast cancer survivors: The need for new management guidelines

Kidney transplantation reduces mortality in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD). Decisions about performing kidney transplantation in the setting of a prior cancer are challenging, as cancer recurrence in the setting of immunosuppression can result in poor outcomes. For cancer of the breast, rapid advances in molecular characterization have allowed improved prognostication, which is not reflected in current guidelines. We developed a 19-question survey to determine transplant surgeons' knowledge, practice, and attitudes regarding guidelines for kidney transplantation in women with breast cancer. Of the 129 respondents from 32 states and 14 countries, 74.8% felt that current guidelines are inadequate. Surgeons outside the United States (US) were more likely to consider transplantation in a breast cancer patient without a waiting period (p = .017). Within the US, 29.2% of surgeons in the Western region would consider transplantation without a waiting period, versus 3.6% of surgeons in the East (p = .004). Encouragingly, 90.4% of providers surveyed would consider eliminating wait-times for women with a low risk of cancer recurrence based on the accurate prediction of molecular assays. These findings support the need for new guidelines incorporating individualized recurrence risk to improve care of ESRD patients with breast cancer.

Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer

Breast cancer has historically been a disease for which immunotherapy was largely unavailable. Recently, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has demonstrated efficacy, including longer progression-free survival and increased overall survival in subsets of patients. Based on clinical benefit in randomized trials, ICIs in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of some patients with advanced/metastatic TNBC have been approved by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA), expanding options for patients. Ongoing questions remain, however, about the optimal chemotherapy backbone for immunotherapy, appropriate biomarker-based selection of patients for treatment, the optimal strategy for immunotherapy treatment in earlier stage disease, and potential use in histological subtypes other than TNBC. To provide guidance to the oncology community on these and other important concerns, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a multidisciplinary panel of experts to develop a clinical practice guideline (CPG). The expert panel drew upon the published literature as well as their clinical experience to develop recommendations for healthcare professionals on these important aspects of immunotherapeutic treatment for breast cancer, including diagnostic testing, treatment planning, immune-related adverse events (irAEs), and patient quality of life (QOL) considerations. The evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations in this CPG are intended to give guidance to cancer care providers treating patients with breast cancer.

Implications of cancer prior to and after heart transplantation

Cancer and cardiovascular disease share many risk factors. Due to improved survival of patients with cancer, the cohort of cancer survivors with heart failure referred for heart transplantation (HT) is growing. Specific considerations include time interval between cancer treatment and HT, risk for recurrence and risk for de novo malignancy (dnM). dnM is an important cause of post-HT morbidity and mortality, with nearly a third diagnosed with malignancy by 10 years post-HT. Compared with the age-matched general population, HT recipients have an approximately 2.5-fold to 4-fold increased risk of developing cancer. HT recipients with prior malignancy show variable cancer recurrence rates, depending on years in remission before HT: 5% recurrence if >5 years in remission, 26% recurrence if 1-5 years in remission and 63% recurrence if <1 year in remission. A myriad of mechanisms influence oncogenesis following HT, including reduced host immunosurveillance from chronic immunosuppression, influence of oncogenic viruses, and the cumulative intensity and duration of immunosuppression. Conversely, protective factors include acyclovir prophylaxis, use of proliferation signal inhibitors (PSI) and female gender. Management involves reducing immunosuppression, incorporating a PSI for immunosuppression and heightened surveillance for allograft rejection. Cancer treatment, including immunotherapy, may be cardiotoxic and lead to graft failure or rejection. Additionally, there exists a competing risk to reduce immunosuppression to improve cancer outcomes, which may increase risk for rejection. A multidisciplinary cardio-oncology team approach is recommended to optimise care and should include an oncologist, transplant cardiologist, transplant pharmacist, palliative care, transplant coordinator and cardio-oncologist.

Barriers to Accessing Kidney Transplantation Among Populations Marginalized by Race and Ethnicity in Canada: A Scoping Review Part 2-East Asian, South Asian, and African, Caribbean, and Black Canadians

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation (KT), a treatment option for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), is associated with longer survival and improved quality of life compared with dialysis. Inequities in access to KT, and specifically, living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT), have been documented in Canada, along various demographic dimensions. In this article, we review existing evidence about inequitable access to KT and LDKT for patients from communities marginalized by race and ethnicity in Canada.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the currently published data on rates of KT and LDKT among East Asian, South Asian, and African, Caribbean, and Black (ACB) Canadian communities and to answer the research question, "what factors may influence inequitable access to KT among East Asian, South Asian, and ACB Canadian communities?."

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Databases and gray literature were searched in June and November 2020 for full-text original research articles or gray literature resources addressing KT access or barriers in East Asian, South Asian, and ACB Canadian communities. A total of 25 articles were analyzed thematically.

SOURCES OF EVIDENCE

Gray literature and CINAHL, OVID Medline, OVID Embase, and Cochrane databases.

CHARTING METHODS

Literature characteristics were recorded and findings which described rates of and factors that influence access to KT were summarized in a narrative account. Key themes were subsequently identified and synthesized thematically in the review.

RESULTS

East Asian, South Asian, and ACB communities in Canada face barriers in accessing culturally appropriate medical knowledge and care and experience inequitable access to KT. Potential barriers include gaps in knowledge about ESKD and KT, religious and spiritual concerns, stigma of ESKD and KT, health beliefs, social determinants of health, and experiences of systemic racism in health care.

LIMITATIONS

This review included literature that used various methodologies and did not assess study quality. Data on ethnicity and race were not reported or defined in a standardized manner. The communities examined in this review are not homogeneous and views on organ donation and KT vary by individual.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review has identified potential barriers for communities marginalized by race and ethnicity in accessing KT and LDKT. Further research is urgently needed to better understand the barriers and support needs of these communities, and to develop strategies to improve equitable access to LDKT for the growingly diverse population in Canada.

Breast cancers observed in transplant patients in a single institution

OBJECTIVE

Document occurrence of breast cancer in females after liver, kidney, or pancreas transplantation seen at a tertiary medical center.

METHODS

Medical records of adult female patients with liver, kidney, or pancreas transplants from 1/1/1995 to 4/4/2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with a history of breast cancer, no mammogram post-transplant, or no research authorization were excluded. Mammogram findings and pathology results were reviewed and recorded. Cancer rates could not be measured in patients followed up outside the institution. Descriptive statistics summarized the cohort. Occurrence rates were estimated using Poisson regression.

RESULTS

1095 women were included and 33 were diagnosed with breast cancer post-transplant. Median age at diagnosis was 58 years. Average interval from transplant to cancer diagnosis was 82.6 months. Observed occurrence of invasive and in-situ breast cancer (reported as per 100,000 person-years [95% confidence interval]) was 353 [243-496]. Liver transplant patients showed the lowest rate (181 [95% CI 73-372]), vs. kidney (476 [305-708]) or pancreas (467 [57-1688]). Patients with the highest breast density showed increased occurrence despite younger age (1001 [367-2178]) compared to those with lower breast density (range 239 [109-454] to 372 [186-666]).

CONCLUSIONS

Female patients after organ transplant experienced increased breast cancer occurrence in this observational study. Those who developed breast cancer also had increased breast density. The findings underscore the importance of breast cancer screening in this population.

Applicability of Augmented Reality in an Organ Transplantation

Augmented reality (AR) delivers virtual information or some of its elements to the real world. This technology, which has been used primarily for entertainment and military applications, has vigorously entered medicine, especially in radiology and surgery, yet has never been used in organ transplantation. AR could be useful in training transplant surgeons, promoting organ donations, graft retrieval and allocation, and microscopic diagnosis of rejection, treatment of complications, and post-transplantation neoplasms. The availability of AR display tools such as Smartphone screens and head-mounted goggles, accessibility of software for automated image segmentation and 3-dimensional reconstruction, and algorithms allowing registration, make augmented reality an attractive tool for surgery including transplantation. The shortage of hospital IT specialists and insufficient investments from medical equipment manufacturers into the development of AR technology remain the most significant obstacles in its broader application.

Treatment and Outcomes of Early Stage Breast Cancer in Patients with Hepatic Dysfunction

BACKGROUND

There exists a dogma of surgical nihilism for patients with cirrhosis and breast cancer causing de-escalation of surgery and impacting survival. We hypothesized that breast cancer surgery would not result in a significant change in the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium (MELD-Na) scores before and after surgery.

METHODS

We performed a single institutional retrospective review of medical records between January 2013 and July 2019 of patients with concurrent cirrhosis and breast cancer. We used the nonparametric Friedman test to compare differences in MELD-Na scores.

RESULTS

Eight patients with both cirrhosis and breast cancer were identified. Median follow-up was 30.5 mo. Half of the patients had Child-Pugh class A cirrhosis and half had Child-Pugh class B cirrhosis. Six (75%) patients underwent lumpectomy and two (25%) underwent mastectomy. There was no statistically significant difference (P = 0.66) in median MELD-Na score before surgery (16) and after surgery (18). Two (25%) patients experienced postoperative complications. Three patients were listed for liver transplantation. Of three listed patients, two (25%) patients underwent successful liver transplantation after breast surgery. One (12.5%) patient died without transplant. Three (37.5%) patients were alive for more than 5 y after breast cancer diagnosis without evidence of cancer recurrence. The eighth patient has remained breast cancer free for more than 6 mo since her surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery for patients with Child-Pugh class A and B cirrhosis and early stage breast cancer did not result in a significant change in MELD-Na score before and after surgery, suggesting that selected patients may benefit from breast cancer surgery with curative intent.

Pre-existing malignancies in renal transplant candidates-time to reconsider waiting times

Current proposals for waiting times for a renal transplant after malignant disease may not be appropriate. New data on malignancies in end-stage renal disease and recent diagnostic and therapeutic options should lead us to reconsider our current practice.

Malignancy after lung transplantation

Lung transplantation is an established therapeutic option for selected patients with advanced lung diseases. As early outcomes after lung transplantation have improved, chronic medical illnesses have emerged as significant obstacles to long-term survival. Among them is post-transplant malignancy, currently representing the 2^nd most common cause of death 5–10 years after transplantation. Chronic immunosuppressive therapy and resulting impairment of anti-tumor immune surveillance is thought to have a central role in cancer development after solid organ transplantation (SOT). Lung transplant recipients receive more immunosuppression than other SOT populations, likely contributing to even higher risk of cancer among this group. The most common cancers in lung transplant recipients are non-melanoma skin cancers, followed by lung cancer and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). The purpose of this review is to outline the common malignancies following lung transplant, their risk factors, prognosis and current means for both prevention and treatment.

CircACAP2 promotes breast cancer proliferation and metastasis by targeting miR-29a/b-3p-COL5A1 axis

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is the most common cancer occurred in female around the world. The occurrence percentage of breast cancer among female who was over 50 years old is >80%. These factors may induce the chance of morbidity, including heavy drinking for a long term, smoking and postmenopausal obesity. Treatment of adjuvant chemotherapeutic and hormonal agents is mostly applied nowadays, which does contribute to the improvement of breast cancer, yet it is still an intractable disease for the side effects it brings. Emerging evidence has proved circular RNAs are involved in gene expression and modulation of biological behaviors. However, the mechanism and functions of circRNA ACAP2 (circACAP2) with respect to breast cancer remain unexplored.

METHODS

qRT-PCR analysis was used to detect relevant expression. Bioinformatics analysis was applied to seek miRNAs which might have binding sites with circACAP2 and miR-29a/b-3p. Functional experiments including CCK-8, colony formation assay and flow cytometry assay detected gene function role in breast cancer cells. RIP, RNA pull down and Luciferase reporter assays were carried out to verify binding sites among circACAP2, miR-29a/b-3p and COL5A1.

RESULTS

CircACAP2 expression was prominently elevated in tumorous tissues. Functionally and mechanistically, circACAP2 promoted breast cancer proliferation and motility by sponging miR-29a/b-3p and modulating COL5A1.

CONCLUSION

Elevated expression of circACAP2 in breast cancer tissues leads to malignant phenotype upon cancerous cells. CircACAP2-miR-29a/b-3p-COL5A1 axis leads to breast cancer tumorigenesis and could hopefully be a novel method for diagnosis and treatment for breast cancer.

MiR-16-5p inhibits breast cancer by reducing AKT3 to restrain NF-κB pathway

Background: Breast cancer endangers the life of women and has become the major cause of deaths among them. MiRNAs are found to exert a regulatory effect on the migration, proliferation and apoptosis of breast cancer cells. This research aims at investigating the miR-16-5p expression and its effect on the pathogenesis of breast cancer. Methods: Their clinical data were analyzed with qRT-PCR. CCK8, EdU and Transwell was performed to explore the function of miR-16-5p in cell migration and proliferation of breast cancer cells. Dual-luciferase reporter assay, immunohistochemistry and Western blotting were carried out to explore the relation between miR-16-5p and AKT3. Results: It was discovered that miR-16-5p was lowly expressed in breast cancer patients. Meanwhile, breast cancer patients with under-expressed miR-16-5p had a lower survival rate than those with highly expressed miR-16-5p. Furthermore, decreased miR-16-5p in cell and animal models enhanced migration and proliferation of breast cancer cells, stimulated cell cycle and reduced cell apoptosis. Finally, we found miR-16-5p restrained the NF-κB pathway and decreased AKT3 gene, thereby suppressing the breast cancer development. Conclusion: It can be seen that miR-16-5p exhibits a low expression in breast cancer tissues, which can inhibit breast cancer by restraining the NF-κB pathway and elevating reducing AKT3.

Effects of caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) on angiogenesis, apoptosis and oxidatıve stress ın various cancer cell lines

Cancer is a common cause of death worldwide. Approximately 80% of cancer patients use complementary or alternative medicines for treatment. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE), the main active component of propolis, exhibits cytotoxic, antiproliferative and anti-cancer effects. Despite its anticancer effects CAPE exhibits no known harmful effects toward normal cells. We investigated the effects of CAPE on angiogenesis, apoptosis and oxidative stress using MDA MB-231, N2a and COLO 320 cell lines and CAPE treatments at 24 and 48 h. A two dimensional cell culture system was used and the findings were evaluated by an indirect immunohistochemical method and H-scores were calculated. CAPE was effective for all three cancer cell lines. After 24 and 48 h, we found a significant decrease in live cells and increased stress in the cells based on e-NOS and i-NOS levels.

Should living donor liver transplantation be an option when deceased donation is not?

When a liver transplantation candidate is declined for listing to receive a deceased organ, sometimes a loved one comes forward and offers to be a living donor. This raises the ethical question of whether a patient who is not eligible for deceased donor liver transplantation should be eligible for living donor liver transplantation. We compare living organ donation in kidney and liver transplantation and explore key ethical concepts of justice, fairness, and societal trust. Ultimately, because there is no alternative life-preserving therapy in end-stage liver disease, and because transplantation with a living donor organ does not involve removing a resource from the common pool of transplant organs, we argue that a standard of "slightly less benefit" than that required for deceased transplantation should be used to determine the acceptability of living donor liver transplantation.