1
|
Maclay LM, Yu M, Amaral S, Adler JT, Sandoval PR, Ratner LE, Schold JD, Mohan S, Husain SA. Disparities in Access to Timely Waitlisting Among Pediatric Kidney Transplant Candidates. Pediatrics 2024; 154:e2024065934. [PMID: 39086359 PMCID: PMC11350102 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2024-065934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Revised: 05/06/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Kidney transplantation with minimal or no dialysis exposure provides optimal outcomes for children with end-stage kidney disease. We sought to understand disparities in timely access to transplant waitlisting. METHODS We conducted a retrospective, registry-based cohort study of candidates ages 3 to 17 added to the US kidney transplant waitlist 2015 to 2019. We defined "preemptive waitlisting" as waitlist addition before receiving dialysis and compared demographics of candidates based on preemptive status. We used competing risk regression to determine the association between preemptive waitlisting and transplantation. We then identified waitlist additions age >18 who initiated dialysis as children, thereby missing pediatric allocation prioritization, and evaluated the association between waitlisting with pediatric prioritization and transplantation. RESULTS Among 4506 pediatric candidates, 48% were waitlisted preemptively. Female sex, Hispanic ethnicity, Black race, and public insurance were associated with lower adjusted relative risk of preemptive waitlisting. Preemptive listing was not associated with time from waitlist activation to transplantation (adjusted hazard ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.87-1.02). Among transplant recipients waitlisted preemptively, 68% had no pretransplant dialysis, whereas recipients listed nonpreemptively had median 1.6 years of dialysis at transplant. Among 415 candidates initiating dialysis as children but waitlisted as adults, transplant rate was lower versus nonpreemptive pediatric candidates after waitlist activation (adjusted hazard ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.44-0.66). CONCLUSIONS Disparities in timely waitlisting are associated with differences in pretransplant dialysis exposure despite no difference in time to transplant after waitlist activation. Young adults who experience delays may miss pediatric prioritization, highlighting an area for policy intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsey M. Maclay
- Departments of Medicine, Division of Nephrology
- Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York
| | - Miko Yu
- Departments of Medicine, Division of Nephrology
- Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York
| | - Sandra Amaral
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Joel T. Adler
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
| | - P. Rodrigo Sandoval
- Surgery, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York
| | - Lloyd E. Ratner
- Surgery, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York
| | - Jesse D. Schold
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado – Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Colorado – Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Departments of Medicine, Division of Nephrology
- Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Syed Ali Husain
- Departments of Medicine, Division of Nephrology
- Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yu M, King KL, Maclay LM, Husain SA, Schold JD, Mohan S. Incomplete reporting of clinically significant acute rejection episodes in the national kidney transplant registry. Am J Transplant 2024:S1600-6135(24)00277-6. [PMID: 38636806 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 04/09/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
Administrative claims data could provide a unique opportunity to identify acute rejection (AR) events using specific antirejection medications and to validate rejected data reported to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. This retrospective cohort study examined differences in registry-reported events and those identified using claims data among adult kidney transplant recipients from 2012 to 2017 using Standard Analysis Files from the US Renal Data System. Rejection rates, survival estimates, and center-level differences were assessed using each approach. Among 45 880 first-time kidney transplant recipients, we identified 3841 AR events within 12 months of transplant reported by centers in the registry; claims data yielded 2945 events. Of all events occurring within 12 months of transplant, 48.5% were reported using registry only, 32.9% were identified using claims only, and 18.6% were identified using both approaches. A 3-year death-censored graft survival probability was 90.0%, 88.4%, and 81.2% (P < .001) for ARs identified using registry only, claims data only, and both approaches, respectively. The large discordance between registry-reported and claims-based events suggests incomplete and potentially inaccurate reporting of events in the Organ Procurement Transplant Network registry. These findings have important implications for analyses that use AR data and underscore the need for improved capture of clinically meaningful events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miko Yu
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA; Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kristen L King
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA; Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York, USA
| | - Lindsey M Maclay
- Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York, USA
| | - S Ali Husain
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA; Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jesse D Schold
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado - Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Colorado - Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA; Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Noreen SM, Patzer RE, Mohan S, Schold JD, Lyden GR, Miller J, Verbeke S, Stewart D, Fritz AR, McBride M, Snyder JJ. Augmenting the Unites States transplant registry with external mortality data: A moving target ripe for further improvement. Am J Transplant 2024; 24:190-212. [PMID: 37704059 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 08/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network conducts a robust death verification process when augmenting the United States transplant registry with external sources of data. Process enhancements added over 35,000 externally verified deaths across waitlist candidates and transplant recipients for all organs beginning in April 2022. Ninety-four percent of added posttransplant deaths occurred beyond 5 years posttransplant, and over 74% occurred beyond 10 years. Deceased donor solid organ recipients transplanted from January 1, 2010, through October 31, 2020, were analyzed from January and July 2022 Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network Standard Transplant Analysis and Research and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients Standard Analysis Files to quantify the impact of including vs excluding unverified deaths (not releasable to researchers) on posttransplant patient survival estimates. Across all organs, 1- and 5-year posttransplant survival rates were not substantially impacted; meaningful differences were observed in 10-year survival among kidney recipients. These findings bear important implications for anyone who utilized transplant registry data to examine long-term outcomes prior to the updated verification process. Users of transplant surveillance data should interpret results of long-term outcomes cautiously, particularly differences across subpopulations, and the transplant community should identify ways to improve data quality and minimize the reporting burden on transplant institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rachel E Patzer
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; Health Services Research Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, USA
| | - Jesse D Schold
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Grace R Lyden
- Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jonathan Miller
- Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Scott Verbeke
- United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Darren Stewart
- Department of Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Amber R Fritz
- United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | | | - Jon J Snyder
- Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Department of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tsapepas DS, King K, Husain SA, Yu ME, Hippen BE, Schold JD, Mohan S. UNOS Decisions Impact Data Integrity of the OPTN Data Registry. Transplantation 2023; 107:e348-e354. [PMID: 37726879 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Organ Procurement Transplant Network (OPTN)/United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry is an important national registry in the field of solid organ transplantation. Data collected are mission critical, given its role in organ allocation prioritization, program performance monitoring by both the OPTN and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, and countless observational analyses that helped to move the field forward. Despite the multifaceted importance of the OPTN/UNOS database, there are clear indications that investments in the database to ensure the quality and reliability of the data have been lacking. METHODS This analysis outlines 2 examples: (1) primary diagnosis for patients who are receiving a second transplant and (2) reporting peripheral vascular disease in kidney transplantation to illustrate the extensive challenges facing the veracity and integrity of the OPTN/UNOS database today. RESULTS Despite guidance that repeat kidney transplant patients should be coded as "retransplant/graft failure" rather than their native kidney disease, only 59% of new incident patients are coded in this manner. Peripheral vascular disease prevalence more than doubled in a 20-y span when the variable became associated with risk adjustment. CONCLUSIONS This article summarizes critical gaps in the OPTN/UNOS database, and we bring forward ideas and proposals for consideration as a path toward improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Demetra S Tsapepas
- Department of Transplant Analytics, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
| | - Kristen King
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Syed Ali Husain
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Miko E Yu
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | | | - Jesse D Schold
- Departments of Surgery and Epidemiology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yu M, King KL, Husain SA, Huml AM, Patzer RE, Schold JD, Mohan S. Discrepant Outcomes between National Kidney Transplant Data Registries in the United States. J Am Soc Nephrol 2023; 34:1863-1874. [PMID: 37535362 PMCID: PMC10631598 DOI: 10.1681/asn.0000000000000194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023] Open
Abstract
SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Effects of reduced access to external data by transplant registries to improve accuracy and completeness of the collected data are compounded by different data management processes at three US organizations that maintain kidney transplant-related datasets. This analysis suggests that the datasets have large differences in reported outcomes that vary across different subsets of patients. These differences, along with recent disclosure of previously missing outcomes data, raise important questions about completeness of the outcome measures. Differences in recorded deaths seem to be increasing in recent years, reflecting the adverse effects of restricted access to external data sources. Although these registries are invaluable sources for the transplant community, discrepancies and incomplete reporting risk undermining their value for future analyses, particularly when used for developing national transplant policy or regulatory measures. BACKGROUND Central to a transplant registry's quality are accuracy and completeness of the clinical information being captured, especially for important outcomes, such as graft failure or death. Effects of more limited access to external sources of death data for transplant registries are compounded by different data management processes at the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR), and the United States Renal Data System (USRDS). METHODS This cross-sectional registry study examined differences in reported deaths among kidney transplant candidates and recipients of kidneys from deceased and living donors in 2000 through 2019 in three transplant datasets on the basis of data current as of 2020. We assessed annual death rates and survival estimates to visualize trends in reported deaths between sources. RESULTS The UNOS dataset included 77,605 deaths among 315,346 recipients and 61,249 deaths among 275,000 nonpreemptively waitlisted candidates who were never transplanted. The SRTR dataset included 87,149 deaths among 315,152 recipients and 60,042 deaths among 259,584 waitlisted candidates. The USRDS dataset included 89,515 deaths among 311,955 candidates and 63,577 deaths among 238,167 waitlisted candidates. Annual death rates among the prevalent transplant population show accumulating differences across datasets-2.31%, 4.00%, and 4.03% by 2019 from UNOS, SRTR, and USRDS, respectively. Long-term survival outcomes were similar among nonpreemptively waitlisted candidates but showed more than 10% discordance between USRDS and UNOS among transplanted patients. CONCLUSIONS Large differences in reported patient outcomes across datasets seem to be increasing, raising questions about their completeness. Understanding the differences between these datasets is essential for accurate, reliable interpretation of analyses that use these data for policy development, regulatory oversight, and research. PODCAST This article contains a podcast at https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/JASN/2023_10_24_JASN0000000000000194.mp3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miko Yu
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
- Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York
| | - Kristen L. King
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
- Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York
| | - S. Ali Husain
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
- Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York
| | - Anne M. Huml
- Department of Kidney Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- Department of Transplantation, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Rachel E. Patzer
- Center for Health Services Research, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
- Indiana University Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Jesse D. Schold
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado – Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Colorado – Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
- Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Buchalter RB, Huml AM, Poggio ED, Schold JD. Geographic hot spots of kidney transplant candidates wait-listed post-dialysis. Clin Transplant 2022; 36:e14821. [PMID: 36102154 PMCID: PMC10078213 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2022] [Revised: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Preemptive wait-listing of deceased donor kidney transplant (DDKT) candidates before maintenance dialysis increases the likelihood of transplantation and improves outcomes among transplant patients. Previous studies have identified substantial disparities in rates of preemptive listing, but a gap exists in examining geographic sources of disparities, particularly for sub-regional units. Identifying small area hot spots where delayed listing is particularly prevalent may more effectively inform both health policy and regionally appropriate interventions. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study utilizing 2010-2020 Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) data for all DDKT candidates to examine overall and race-stratified geospatial hot spots of post-dialysis wait-listing in U.S. zip code tabulation areas (ZCTA). Three geographic clustering methods were utilized to identify robust statistically significant hot spots of post-dialysis wait-listing. RESULTS Novel sub-regional hot spots were identified in the southeast, southwest, Appalachia, and California, with a majority existing in the southeast. Race-stratified results were more nuanced, but broadly reflected similar patterns. Comparing transplant candidates in hot spots to candidates in non-clusters indicated a strong association between residence in hot spots and high area deprivation (OR: 6.76, 95%CI: 6.52-7.02), indicating that improving access healthcare in these areas may be particularly beneficial. CONCLUSION Our study identified overall and race-stratified hot spots with low rates of preemptive wait list placement in the U.S., which may be useful for prospective healthcare policy and interventions via targeting of these narrowly defined geographical areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. Blake Buchalter
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research InstituteCleveland ClinicClevelandOhioUSA
- Center for Populations Health Research, Lerner Research InstituteCleveland ClinicClevelandOhioUSA
| | - Anne M. Huml
- Department of Kidney Medicine, Glickman Urological and Kidney InstituteCleveland ClinicClevelandOhioUSA
| | - Emilio D. Poggio
- Department of Kidney Medicine, Glickman Urological and Kidney InstituteCleveland ClinicClevelandOhioUSA
| | - Jesse D. Schold
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research InstituteCleveland ClinicClevelandOhioUSA
- Center for Populations Health Research, Lerner Research InstituteCleveland ClinicClevelandOhioUSA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Husain SA, King KL, Owen-Simon NL, Fernandez HE, Ratner LE, Mohan S. Access to kidney transplantation among pediatric candidates with prior solid organ transplants in the United States. Pediatr Transplant 2022; 26:e14303. [PMID: 35615911 PMCID: PMC9378581 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2021] [Revised: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pediatric kidney transplant candidates require timely access to transplant to optimize growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes. We studied access to transplant for pediatric candidates with prior organ transplants. METHODS We used US registry data to identify pediatric kidney transplant candidates added to the waiting list 2015-2019 and used competing risk regression to study the association between prior transplant status and probability of receiving a kidney transplant, treating wait-list removal and death as competing events. RESULTS Of 4962 pediatric kidney transplant candidates included, 89% had no prior transplant and 11% had received a prior organ transplant (kidney 87%, liver 5%, heart 5%). Prior transplant recipients were older at listing (median 15 vs. 12 years) and more likely to have PRA≥98% (22% vs. 0.3%) (both p < .001). There was no significant difference in the proportion of candidates from each group who were preemptively wait-listed. Unadjusted competing risk regression showed a lower risk of kidney transplant after wait-listing among candidates with prior organ transplant (HR 0.52, 95%CI 0.47-0.59, p < .001). This association remained significant after adjusting for candidate characteristics (HR 0.73, 95%CI 0.63-0.83, p < .001). Among deceased donor kidney recipients, median KDPI was similar between groups, but recipients with prior transplants were more likely to receive kidneys from donors with hypertension (4% vs. 1%, p = .01) and donors after cardiac death (11% vs. 4%, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS Pediatric kidney transplant candidates with prior organ transplants have reduced access to transplant after wait-listing. Allocation system changes are needed to improve timely access to transplant for this vulnerable group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Ali Husain
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, NY
| | - Kristen L. King
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, NY
| | - Nina L. Owen-Simon
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, New York
| | - Hilda E. Fernandez
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY
| | - Lloyd E. Ratner
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, New York
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, NY
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yu K, King K, Husain SA, Mohan S. Variations in Deceased Donor Terminal Creatinine Values Reported in the OPTN Data Registry. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2022; 17:565-567. [PMID: 35197257 PMCID: PMC8993485 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.15511121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen Yu
- K Yu, Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, United States
| | - Kristen King
- K King, Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, United States
| | - Syed Ali Husain
- S Husain, Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, United States
| | - Sumit Mohan
- S Mohan, Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cho S, Sin M, Tsapepas D, Dale LA, Husain SA, Mohan S, Natarajan K. Content Coverage Evaluation of the OMOP Vocabulary on the Transplant Domain Focusing on Concepts Relevant for Kidney Transplant Outcomes Analysis. Appl Clin Inform 2020; 11:650-658. [PMID: 33027834 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1716528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improving outcomes of transplant recipients within and across transplant centers is important with the increasing number of organ transplantations being performed. The current practice is to analyze the outcomes based on patient level data submitted to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS). Augmenting the UNOS data with other sources such as the electronic health record will enrich the outcomes analysis, for which a common data model (CDM) can be a helpful tool for transforming heterogeneous source data into a uniform format. OBJECTIVES In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of representing concepts from the UNOS transplant registry forms with the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) CDM vocabulary to understand the content coverage of OMOP vocabulary on transplant-specific concepts. METHODS Two annotators manually mapped a total of 3,571 unique concepts extracted from the UNOS registry forms to concepts in the OMOP vocabulary. Concept mappings were evaluated by (1) examining the agreement among the initial two annotators and (2) investigating the number of UNOS concepts not mapped to a concept in the OMOP vocabulary and then classifying them. A subset of mappings was validated by clinicians. RESULTS There was a substantial agreement between annotators with a kappa score of 0.71. We found that 55.5% of UNOS concepts could not be represented with OMOP standard concepts. The majority of unmapped UNOS concepts were categorized into transplant, measurement, condition, and procedure concepts. CONCLUSION We identified categories of unmapped concepts and found that some transplant-specific concepts do not exist in the OMOP vocabulary. We suggest that adding these missing concepts to OMOP would facilitate further research in the transplant domain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvia Cho
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States
| | - Margaret Sin
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States
| | - Demetra Tsapepas
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States.,Department of Transplantation, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, United States
| | - Leigh-Anne Dale
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, United States
| | - Syed A Husain
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, United States
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, United States.,Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, United States
| | - Karthik Natarajan
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States
| |
Collapse
|