CAR-T therapy in solid organ transplant recipients with treatment refractory posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder

Successful Treatment of Refractory Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder With Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in a Heart Transplant Recipient

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) are opportunistic malignancies that complicate the success of hematopoietic stem cell or solid organ transplantation. These disorders often arise post-transplant due to the immunosuppression required for minimizing the risk of rejection of donor tissue. First-line treatment of these disorders includes limiting immunosuppression when permissible. Subsequent treatment includes the use of monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody (rituximab), and/or combination chemotherapy. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment paradigm in many lymphoid malignancies. It is not approved for PTLD due to exclusion of PTLD patients from pivotal clinical trials. Also, its utilization post-transplant can be complex and multidisciplinary care is of utmost importance for successful administration of a potentially curative treatment. We present a 68-year-old patient with history of heart transplant for non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, diagnosed with PTLD that was refractory to treatment using current guidelines until successfully receiving CAR T-cell therapy.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders following kidney transplantation: A literature review with updates on risk factors, prognostic indices, screening strategies, treatment and analysis of donor type

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) is a devastating complication of kidney transplantation with an insidious presentation and potential to disseminate aggressively. This review delineates the risk factors, prognostic indexes, screening, current management algorithm and promising treatment strategies for PTLD. Kidneys from both extended criteria donors (ECD) and living donors (LD) are being increasingly used to expand the donor pool. This review also delineates whether PTLD outcomes vary based on these donor sources. While Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a well-known risk factor for PTLD development, the use of T-cell depleting induction agents has been increasingly implicated in aggressive, monomorphic forms of PTLD. Research regarding maintenance therapy is sparse. The international prognostic index seems to be the most validate prognostic tool. Screening for PTLD is controversial, as annual PET-CT is most sensitive but costly, while targeted monitoring of EBV-seronegative patients was more economically feasible, is recommended by the American Society of Transplantation, but is limited to a subset of the population. Other screening strategies such as using Immunoglobulin/T-cell receptor require further validation. A risk-stratified approach is taken in the treatment of PTLD. The first step is the reduction of immunosuppressants, after which rituximab and chemotherapy may be introduced if unsuccessful. Some novel treatments have also shown potential benefit in studies: brentuximab vedotin, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and EBV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Analysis of LD v DD recipients show no significant difference in incidence and mortality of PTLD but did reveal a shortened time to development of PTLD from transplant. Analysis of SCD vs ECD recipients show a higher incidence of PTLD in the ECD group, which might be attributed to longer time on dialysis for these patients, age, and the pro-inflammatory nature of these organs. However, incidence of PTLD overall is still extremely low. Efforts should be focused on optimising recipients instead. Minimising the use of T-cell depleting therapy while encouraging research on the effect of new immunosuppressants on PTLD, screening for EBV status are essential, while enabling shared decision-making during counselling when choosing kidney donor types and individualised risk tailoring are strongly advocated.

Adoptive Immune Effector Cell Therapies in Cancer and Solid Organ Transplantation: A Review

Cancer is one of the most devastating complications of kidney transplantation and constitutes one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality among solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipients. Immunosuppression, although effective in preventing allograft rejection, inherently inhibits immune surveillance against oncogenic viral infections and malignancy. Adoptive cell therapy, particularly immune effector cell therapy, has long been a modality of interest in both cancer and transplantation, though has only recently stepped into the spotlight with the development of virus-specific T-cell therapy and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. Although these modalities are best described in hematopoietic cell transplantation and hematologic malignancies, their potential application in the SOT setting may hold tremendous promise for those with limited therapeutic options. In this review, we provide a brief overview of the development of adoptive cell therapies with a focus on virus-specific T-cell therapy and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. We also describe the current experience of these therapies in the SOT setting as well as the challenges in their application and future directions in their development.

Epstein Barr virus-directed T-cell therapy for refractory EBV-PTLD in a toddler post Orthotopic heart transplantation

Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) is a ubiquitous herpes type virus that is associated with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). Usual management includes reduction or cessation of immunosuppression and in some cases chemotherapy including rituximab. However, limited therapies are available if PTLD is refractory to rituximab. Several clinical trials have investigated the use of EBV-directed T cells in rituximab-refractory patients; however, data regarding response is scarce and inconclusive. Herein, we describe a patient with EBV-PTLD refractory to rituximab after orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) requiring EBV-directed T-cell therapy. This article aims to highlight the unique and aggressive clinical presentation and progression of PTLD with utilization of EBV-directed T-cell therapy for management and associated pitfalls.

Efficacy and Toxicity of CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy for Lymphoma in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The safety and efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy in solid organ transplant recipients is poorly understood, given the paucity of available data in this patient population. There is a theoretical risk of compromising transplanted organ function with CAR T cell therapy; conversely, organ transplantation-related immunosuppression can alter the function of CAR T cells. Given the prevalence of post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disease, which often can be difficult to treat with conventional chemoimmunotherapy, understanding the risks and benefits of delivering lymphoma-directed CAR T cell therapy in solid organ transplant recipients is of utmost importance. We sought to determine the efficacy of CAR T cell therapy in solid organ transplant recipients as well as the associated adverse effects, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and compromised solid organ transplant function. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of adult recipients of solid organ transplant who received CAR T cell therapy for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Primary outcomes included efficacy, defined as overall response (OR), complete response (CR), progression-free survival, and overall survival, as well as rates of CRS and ICANS. Secondary outcomes included rates of transplanted organ loss, compromised organ function, and alterations to immunosuppressant regimens. After a systematic literature review and 2-reviewer screening process, we identified 10 studies suitable for descriptive analysis and 4 studies suitable for meta-analysis. Among all patients, 69% (24 of 35) achieved a response to CAR T cell therapy, and 52% (18 of 35) achieved a CR. CRS of any grade occurred in 83% (29 of 35), and CRS grade ≥3 occurred in 9% (3 of 35). Sixty percent of the patients (21 of 35) developed ICANS, and 34% (12 of 35) developed ICANS grade ≥3. The incidence of any grade 5 toxicity among all patients was 11% (4 of 35). Fourteen percent of the patients (5 of 35) experienced loss of the transplanted organ. Immunosuppressant therapy was held in 22 patients but eventually restarted in 68% of them (15 of 22). Among the studies included in the meta-analysis, the pooled OR rate was 70% (95% confidence interval [CI], 29.2% to 100%; I2 = 71%) and the pooled CR rate was 46% (95% CI, 25.4% to 67.8%; I2 = 29%). The rates of any grade CRS and grade ≥3 CRS were 88% (95% CI, 69% to 99%; I2 = 0%) and 5% (95% CI, 0% to 21%; I2 = 0%), respectively. The rates of any grade ICANS and ICANS grade ≥3 were 54% (95% CI, 9% to 96%; I2 = 68%) and 40% (95% CI, 3% to 85%; I2 = 63%), respectively. The efficacy of CAR T cell therapy in solid organ transplant recipients is comparable to that in the general population as reported in prior investigational studies, with an acceptable toxicity profile in terms of CRS, ICANS, and transplanted organ compromise. Further studies are needed to determine long-term effects on organ function, sustained response rates, and best practices peri-CAR T infusion period in this patient population.

Research progress on CD8+ T cell immune regulation in allogenic transplantation

With advances in tissue typing, organ preservation techniques, and clinical surgery, organ transplantation has gained popularity as a treatment option for various end-stage diseases. Allogeneic transplantation has been widely adopted and extensively researched in clinical practice. Despite significant breakthroughs and progress in immunosuppression, this procedure is still associated with several adverse reactions and complications. Therefore, there is a continuing need to explore new immunological approaches to provide fresh insights and guidance for clinical transplantation. CD8+ T cells, traditionally known for their cytotoxic function and their ability to recognize transplanted organs as "non-self" entities, display cytotoxicity. However, recent studies have unveiled that CD8+ T cells have various subtypes and functions that extend beyond conventional cytotoxicity. These CD8+ T cell subtypes include Effector CD8+ T cells, Memory CD8+ T cells, and CD8Treg cells. This review examines the immune regulatory mechanisms of CD8+ T cells in allogeneic transplantation and discusses the potential applications of CD8+ T cells in treating tumors in transplant recipients who are receiving immunosuppressive therapy. These findings offer theoretical guidance for reducing post-transplant rejection reactions and improving adverse prognoses, offering new hope for improved clinical survival rate.

Programmed cell death ligand 1 expression associated with subtypes of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder among pediatric kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on tumor cells engages the PD-1 receptor on T cells, inhibiting anti-tumor responses. PD-L1 has been detected in cases of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) but reports are limited. Here we examine PD-L1 expression and evaluate for clinical correlations.

METHODS

Twenty-one cases of PTLD were identified among pediatric kidney transplant recipients at our institution from February 1996 to April 2017. Using paraffin-embedded tissue biopsies, we examined 21 primary tumors for expression using PD-L1 monoclonal antibody performed with PAX5 as a double stain. We scored expression of PD-L1 on lesional B-cells as a percentage of positive cells. Clinical course and outcome were obtained from retrospective chart review.

RESULTS

Applying revised 2017 WHO PTLD classification showed five non-destructive, nine polymorphic, and seven monomorphic cases. Average PD-L1 expression based upon PTLD subtype was: non-destructive 11%, polymorphic 43%, and monomorphic 73% (p = .01). Two patients transferred shortly after diagnosis, five received chemotherapy, and three died from PTLD. Among the fatalities, all showed monomorphic PTLD and 90% of lesional B-cells expressed PD-L1.

CONCLUSION

In this case series, significant differences in PD-L1 expression were seen among different subtypes, and monomorphic PTLD demonstrated the highest expression. Study of a larger cohort is needed, and if the correlation of PD-L1 expression and PTLD subtype is confirmed, this may highlight the potential utility of checkpoint inhibitor therapy in cases of severe or refractory disease among kidney transplant recipient in whom the risk of allograft loss is acceptable given the option of chronic dialysis.

Pre-Emptive Use of Rituximab in Epstein-Barr Virus Reactivation: Incidence, Predictive Factors, Monitoring, and Outcomes

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) is a fatal complication of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) associated with the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). Multiple factors such as transplant type, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), human leukocyte antigens (HLA) mismatch, patient age, and T-lymphocyte-depleting treatments increase the risk of PTLD. EBV reactivation in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients is monitored through periodic quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR) tests. However, substantial uncertainty persists regarding the clinically significant EBV levels for these patients. Guidelines recommend initiating EBV monitoring no later than four weeks post-HCT and conducting it weekly. Pre-emptive therapies, such as the reduction of immunosuppressive therapy and the administration of rituximab to treat EBV viral loads are also suggested. In this study, we investigated the occurrence of EBV-PTLD in 546 HCT recipients, focusing on the clinical manifestations and risk factors associated with the disease. We managed to identify 67,150 viral genomic copies/mL as the cutoff point for predicting PTLD, with 80% sensitivity and specificity. Among our cohort, only 1% of the patients presented PTLD. Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and GVHD were independently associated with lower survival rates and higher treatment-related mortality. According to our findings, prophylactic measures including regular monitoring, pre-emptive therapy, and supportive treatment against infections can be effective in preventing EBV-related complications. This study also recommends conducting EBV monitoring at regular intervals, initiating pre-emptive therapy when viral load increases, and identifying factors that increase the risk of PTLD. Our study stresses the importance of frequent and careful follow-ups of post-transplant complications and early intervention in order to improve survival rates and reduce mortality.

Screening and Management of PTLD

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) represents a heterogeneous group of lymphoproliferative diseases occurring in the setting of immunosuppression following hematopoietic stem cells transplant and solid organ transplantation. Despite its overall low incidence, PTLD is a serious complication following transplantation, with a mortality rate as high as 50% in transplant recipients. Therefore, it is important to establish for each transplant recipient a personalized risk evaluation for the development of PTLD based on the determination of Epstein-Barr virus serostatus and viral load following the initiation of immunosuppression. Due to the dynamic progression of PTLD, reflected in the diverse pathological features, different therapeutic approaches have been used to treat this disorder. Moreover, new therapeutic strategies based on the administration of virus-specific cytotoxic T cells have been developed. In this review, we summarize the available data on screening and treatment to suggest a strategy to identify transplant recipients at a higher risk for PTLD development and to review the current therapeutic options for PTLD.

How I treat posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is an important and potentially life-threatening complication of solid organ transplant and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Given the heterogeneity of PTLD and the risk of infectious complications in patients with immunosuppression, the treatment of this disease remains challenging. Monomorphic PTLD and lymphoma of B-cell origin account for the majority of cases. Treatment strategies for PTLD consist of response-adapted, risk-stratified methods using immunosuppression reduction, immunotherapy, and/or chemotherapy. With this approach, ∼25% of the patients do not need chemotherapy. Outcomes for patients with high risk or those who do not respond to frontline therapies remain dismal, and novel treatments are needed in this setting. PTLD is associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection in 60% to 80% of cases, making EBV-directed therapy an attractive treatment modality. Recently, the introduction of adoptive immunotherapies has become a promising option for refractory cases; hopefully, these treatment strategies can be used as earlier lines of therapy in the future.

Important Considerations in the Diagnosis and Management of Post-transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A relative lack of molecular and clinical studies compared to other lymphoid cancers has historically made it difficult to determine optimal management approaches in post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). We sought to better define the "state of the science" in PTLD by examining recent advances in risk assessment, genomic profiling, and trials of PTLD-directed therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several major clinical trials highlight risk-stratified sequential therapy incorporating rituximab with or without chemotherapy as a rational treatment strategy in patients with CD20+ PTLD who do not respond to reduction of immunosuppression alone. Epstein Barr virus (EBV)-targeted cytotoxic lymphocytes are a promising approach in patients with relapsed/refractory EBV+ PTLD, but dedicated clinical trials should determine how autologous chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CAR-T) may be safely administered to PTLD patients. Sequencing studies underscore the important effect of EBV infection on PTLD pathogenesis, but comprehensive genomic and tumor microenvironment profiling are needed to identify biomarkers that predict response to treatment in this clinically heterogeneous disease.

Current Perspectives on the Management of Herpesvirus Infections in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) are at high risk of human herpesvirus (HHV)-related morbidity and mortality due to the use of immunosuppressive therapy. We aim to increase awareness and understanding of HHV disease burden in SOTRs by providing an overview of current prevention and management strategies as described in the literature and guidelines. We discuss challenges in both prevention and treatment as well as future perspectives.

Real-world evidence of the safety and survival with CD19 CAR-T cell therapy for relapsed/refractory solid organ transplant-related PTLD

The use of CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy for relapsed/refractory solid organ transplantation (SOT)-related post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is not well studied. We conducted a multicentre, retrospective analysis of adults with relapsed/refractory SOT-associated PTLD. Among 22 relapsed/refractory SOT-PTLD patients, the pathology was monomorphic B cell. Prior SOTs included 14 kidney (64%), three liver (14%), two heart (9%), one intestinal (5%), one lung (5%), and one pancreas after kidney transplant (5%). The median time from SOT to PTLD diagnosis was 107 months. Pre-CAR-T bridging therapy was used in 55% of patients, and immunosuppression was stopped completely before CAR-T infusion in 64%. Eighteen (82%) patients experienced cytokine release syndrome: one (5%) each grade (G) 3 and G4. The immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome was observed in 16 (73%) patients: six (27%) G3 and two (9%) G4. The overall response rate was 64% (55% complete response). Three patients (14%) experienced allograft rejection after CAR-T. The two-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 35% and 58%, respectively. Additionally, the achievement of CR post-CAR-T was strongly associated with survival. Collectively, the safety and efficacy of CD19 CAR-T therapy in relapsed/refractory SOT-related PTLD appeared similar to pivotal CAR-T data, including approximately one-third of patients achieving sustained remission.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder: Update on treatment and novel therapies

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is rare and heterogeneous lymphoid proliferations that occur as a result of immunosuppression following solid organ transplant (SOT) and haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) with the majority being driven by EBV. Although some histologies are similar to lymphoid neoplasms seen in immunocompetent patients, treatment of PTLD may be different due to difference in pathobiology and higher risk of treatment complications. The most common treatment approach in SOT PTLD after failing immunosuppression reduction (RIS) takes into consideration a risk-stratified sequential algorithm with rituximab +/- chemotherapy based on phase 2 studies. In HSCT PTLD, RIS alone and chemotherapy are usually ineffective making rituximab +/- RIS as the gold standard of frontline treatment. In this review, we give an update on the treatment of PTLD beyond RIS. We highlight the most recent studies that attempted to incorporate more aggressive chemotherapy regimens and novel treatments into the traditional risk-stratified sequential approach. We also discuss the role of EBV-cytotoxic T lymphocytes in treatment of EBV-driven PTLD. Other novel agents with potential role in PTLD will be discussed in addition to the challenges that could arise with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors in this population.

Diagnosis and management of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease following solid organ transplantation in children, adolescents, and young adults

Post-transplant Lymphoproliferative Disease (PTLD) remains a major complication of solid organ transplantation (SOT) in pediatric patients. The majority are Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) driven CD20⁺ B-cell proliferations responsive to reduction to immunosuppression and anti-CD20 directed immunotherapy. This review focusses on the epidemiology, role of EBV, clinical presentation, current treatment strategies, adoptive immunotherapy and future research in EBV + PTLD in pediatric patients.

EBV-driven lymphoid neoplasms associated with pediatric ALL maintenance therapy

The development of a second malignancy after the diagnosis of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a rare event. Certain second malignancies have been linked with specific elements of leukemia therapy, yet the etiology of most second neoplasms remains obscure and their optimal management strategies are unclear. This is a first comprehensive report of non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs) following pediatric ALL therapy, excluding stem-cell transplantation. We analyzed data of patients who developed NHL following ALL diagnosis and were enrolled in 12 collaborative pediatric ALL trials between 1980-2018. Eighty-five patients developed NHL, with mature B-cell lymphoproliferations as the dominant subtype (56 of 85 cases). Forty-six of these 56 cases (82%) occurred during or within 6 months of maintenance therapy. The majority exhibited histopathological characteristics associated with immunodeficiency (65%), predominantly evidence of Epstein-Barr virus-driven lymphoproliferation. We investigated 66 cases of post-ALL immunodeficiency-associated lymphoid neoplasms, 52 from our study and 14 additional cases from a literature search. With a median follow-up of 4.9 years, the 5-year overall survival for the 66 patients with immunodeficiency-associated lymphoid neoplasms was 67.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 56-81). Five-year cumulative risks of lymphoid neoplasm- and leukemia-related mortality were 20% (95% CI, 10.2-30) and 12.4% (95% CI, 2.7-22), respectively. Concurrent hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis was associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio, 7.32; 95% CI, 1.62-32.98; P = .01). A large proportion of post-ALL lymphoid neoplasms are associated with an immunodeficient state, likely precipitated by ALL maintenance therapy. Awareness of this underrecognized entity and pertinent diagnostic tests are crucial for early diagnosis and optimal therapy.

Human Regulatory T Cells: Understanding the Role of Tregs in Select Autoimmune Skin Diseases and Post-Transplant Nonmelanoma Skin Cancers

Regulatory T cells (Tregs) play an important role in maintaining immune tolerance and homeostasis by modulating how the immune system is activated. Several studies have documented the critical role of Tregs in suppressing the functions of effector T cells and antigen-presenting cells. Under certain conditions, Tregs can lose their suppressive capability, leading to a compromised immune system. For example, mutations in the Treg transcription factor, Forkhead box P3 (FOXP3), can drive the development of autoimmune diseases in multiple organs within the body. Furthermore, mutations leading to a reduction in the numbers of Tregs or a change in their function facilitate autoimmunity, whereas an overabundance can inhibit anti-tumor and anti-pathogen immunity. This review discusses the characteristics of Tregs and their mechanism of action in select autoimmune skin diseases, transplantation, and skin cancer. We also examine the potential of Tregs-based cellular therapies in autoimmunity.

CD19 CAR-T therapy in solid organ transplant recipients: case report and systematic review

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a leading cause of cancer death in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs). Relapsed or refractory (R/R) PTLD portends a high risk of death and effective management is not well established. CD19-targeted CAR-T cell therapy has been utilized, but the risks and benefits are unknown. We report the first case of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) PTLD treated with lisocabtagene maraleucel and present a systematic literature review of SOTRs with PTLD treated with CD19 CAR-T therapy. Our patient achieved a complete response (CR) with limited toxicity but experienced a CD19⁺ relapse 8 months after infusion despite CAR-T persistence. Literature review revealed 14 DLBCL and 2 Burkitt lymphoma PTLD cases treated with CD19 CAR-T cells. Kidney (n = 12), liver (n = 2), heart (n = 2), and pancreas after kidney (n = 1) transplant recipients were analyzed. The objective response rate (ORR) was 82.4% (14/17), with 58.5% (10/17) CRs and a 6.5-month median duration of response. Among kidney transplant recipients, the ORR was 91.7% (11/12). Allograft rejection occurred in 23.5% (4/17). No graft failure occurred. Our analysis suggests that CD19 CAR-T therapy offers short-term effectiveness and manageable toxicity in SOTRs with R/R PTLD. Further investigation through larger datasets and prospective study is needed.

Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disease (PTLD) after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Biology and Treatment Options

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) is a serious complication occurring as a consequence of immunosuppression in the setting of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) or solid organ transplantation (SOT). The majority of PTLD arises from B-cells, and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection is present in 60-80% of the cases, revealing the central role played by the latent infection in the pathogenesis of the disease. Therefore, EBV serological status is considered the most important risk factor associated with PTLDs, together with the depth of T-cell immunosuppression pre- and post-transplant. However, despite the advances in pathogenesis understanding and the introduction of novel treatment options, PTLD arising after alloHSCT remains a particularly challenging disease, and there is a need for consensus on how to treat rituximab-refractory cases. This review aims to explore the pathogenesis, risk factors, and treatment options of PTLD in the alloHSCT setting, finally focusing on adoptive immunotherapy options, namely EBV-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (EBV-CTL) and chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR T).

Recent Advances in Adult Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder

PTLD is a rare but severe complication of hematopoietic or solid organ transplant recipients, with variable incidence and timing of occurrence depending on different patient-, therapy-, and transplant-related factors. The pathogenesis of PTLD is complex, with most cases of early PLTD having a strong association with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and the iatrogenic, immunosuppression-related decrease in T-cell immune surveillance. Without appropriate T-cell response, EBV-infected B cells persist and proliferate, resulting in malignant transformation. Classification is based on the histologic subtype and ranges from nondestructive hyperplasias to monoclonal aggressive lymphomas, with the most common subtype being diffuse large B-cell lymphoma-like PTLD. Management focuses on prevention of PTLD development, as well as therapy for active disease. Treatment is largely based on the histologic subtype. However, given lack of clinical trials providing evidence-based data on PLTD therapy-related outcomes, there are no specific management guidelines. In this review, we discuss the pathogenesis, histologic classification, and risk factors of PTLD. We further focus on common preventive and frontline treatment modalities, as well as describe the application of novel therapies for PLTD and elaborate on potential challenges in therapy.

Transplant Onconephrology: An Update

Transplant onconephrology is a growing specialty focused on the health care of kidney transplant recipients with cancer. Given the complexities associated with the care of transplant patients, along with the advent of novel cancer therapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen-receptor T cells, there is a dire need for the subspecialty of transplant onconephrology. The management of cancer in the setting of kidney transplantation is best accomplished by a multidisciplinary team, including transplant nephrologists, oncologists, and patients. This review addresses the current state and future opportunities for transplant onconephrology, including the roles of the multidisciplinary team, and related scientific and clinical knowledge.

Transplant Onconephrology in Patients With Kidney Transplants

Cancer is a leading cause of death in patients with kidney transplantation. Patients with kidney transplants are 10- to 200-times more likely to develop cancers after transplant than the general population, depending on the cancer type. Recent advances in cancer therapies have dramatically improved survival outcomes; however, patients with kidney transplants face unique challenges of immunosuppression management, cancer screening, and recurrence of cancer after transplant. Patients with a history of cancer tend to be excluded from transplant candidacy or are required to have long cancer-free wait time before wait-listing. The strategy of pretransplant wait time management may need to be revisited as cancer therapies improve, which is most applicable to patients with a history of multiple myeloma. In this review, we discuss several important topics in transplant onconephrology: the current recommendations for pretransplant wait times for transplant candidates with cancer histories, cancer screening post-transplant, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, strategies for transplant patients with a history of multiple myeloma, and novel therapies for patients with post-transplant malignancies. With emerging novel cancer treatments, it is critical to have multidisciplinary discussions involving patients, caregivers, transplant nephrologists, and oncologists to achieve patient-oriented goals.

Emerging Concepts in Managing Malignancy in Kidney Transplant Patients

Cancer remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in kidney transplant recipients, due to long-term immunosuppression. Salient issues to consider in decreasing the burden of malignancy among kidney transplant recipients include pretransplant recipient evaluation, post-transplant screening and monitoring, and optimal treatment strategies for the kidney transplant recipients with cancer. In this review, we address cancer incidence and outcomes, approaches to cancer screening and monitoring pretransplant and post-transplant, as well as treatment strategies, immunosuppressive management, and multidisciplinary approaches in the kidney transplant recipients with cancer.

Epstein-Barr virus posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder: update on management and outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Management of Epstein-Barr virus posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (EBV PTLD) is complex, involving risk stratification, prevention and/or preemptive measures involving monitoring EBV DNAemia and balancing treatment options, using a combination of reduction of immune suppression, anti-B cell therapy, and cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs).

RECENT FINDINGS

The highest risk factor for the development of EBV PTLD in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) remains T cell depletion, with increasing use of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) or alemtuzumab in conditioning. In solid organ transplantation (SOT), the incidence of PTLD is highest among EBV seronegative recipients who are at risk for primary EBV infection following transplant in the first 12 months. Prevention is a critical component of the management of EBV PTLD. Although preemptive therapy remains standard of care, there continues to be heterogenicity and debate over the optimal choice of EBV DNA quantification and the threshold to use. Novel therapies such as donor-derived multipathogen and EBV specific CTLs for the prevention and third party CTLs for the treatment of EBV PTLD are promising, with rapidly expanding evidence, including large scale Phase III trials currently underway.

SUMMARY

With an increasing number of risk groups for developing EBV PTLD in HCT and SOT, management strategies using prophylaxis or preemptive therapy remain standard of care, however the use of prophylactic or preemptive EBV specific or multipathogen CTLs show promising results and safety profiles.

Cellular therapies in kidney transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Current immunosuppressive regimens used in kidney transplantation are sometimes ineffective and carry significant risks of morbidity and mortality. Cellular therapies are a promising alternative to prolong graft survival while minimizing treatment toxicity. We review the recently published breakthrough studies using cell therapies in kidney transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

The reviewed phase I and II trials showed that cell therapies are feasible and safe in kidney transplantation, sometimes associated with less infectious complications than traditional regimens. Regulatory T cells and macrophages were added to the induction regimen, allowing for lower immunosuppressive drug doses without higher rejection risk. Regulatory T cells are also a treatment for subclinical rejection on the 6 months biopsy. Other strategies, like bone marrow-derived mesenchymal cells, genetically modified regulatory T cells, and chimerism-based tolerance are also really promising. In addition, to improve graft tolerance, cell therapy could be used to prevent or treat viral infection after transplantation.

SUMMARY

Emerging data underline that cell therapy is a feasible and safe treatment in kidney transplantation. Although the evidence points to a benefit for transplant recipients, studies with standardized protocols, representative control groups, and longer follow-up are needed to answer the question definitively and guide future research.

Safety and Efficacy of Anti-CD19-Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Combined With Programmed Cell Death 1 Inhibitor Therapy in a Patient With Refractory Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disease: Case Report and Literature Review

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) often exhibits poor prognosis and high mortality, and there are no uniform guidelines for the treatment of this disease. Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells show significant efficacy in treatment of relapse/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Treatment using anti-CD19-CAR T-cell therapy in PTLD has been limited by immunosuppressants and has not been widely employed. In this study, a refractory post kidney transplant DLBCL patient with a high tumor burden was enrolled in a clinical trial of anti-CD19-CAR T-cell therapy. The tacrolimus dose was not decreased during combination chemotherapy, as the creatinine level of the patient increased. To improve the function of autologous T cells, combination therapy with anti-CD19-CAR T cells and programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors was selected. After treatment with the combination therapy, the patient was diagnosed with grade 1 cytokine release syndrome and grade 3 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. The amplification peak of anti-CD19-CAR T cells reached 9.01% on day 7. With PD-1 inhibitor maintenance therapy, his disease was maintained in partial remission for 18 weeks. However, his tumor suddenly increased in size, and he discontinued the treatment, including radiation therapy. The anti-CD19-CAR T cell and PD-1 inhibitors have a combined effect on PTLD, and this combination therapy needs to be further explored.

Chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy: Which drugs can be safely used in the solid organ transplant recipients?

In solid organ transplant recipients, cancer is associated with worse prognosis than in the general population. Among the causes of increased cancer‐associated mortality, are the limitations in selecting the optimal anticancer regimen in solid organ transplant recipients, because of the associated risks of graft toxicity and rejection, drug‐to‐drug interactions, reduced kidney or liver function, and patient frailty and comorbid conditions. The advent of immunotherapy has generated further challenges, mainly because checkpoint inhibitors increase the risk of rejection, which may have life‐threatening consequences in recipients of life‐saving organs. In general, there are no safe or unsafe anticancer drugs. Rather, the optimal choice of the anticancer regimen results from a careful risk/benefit assessment, from the awareness of potential pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug‐to‐drug interactions, and of the risk of drug overexposure in patients with kidney or liver dysfunction. In this review, we summarize general principles that may help the oncologists and transplant physicians in the multidisciplinary management of recipients of solid organ transplantation with cancer who are candidates for chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or immunotherapy.

EBV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes for refractory EBV-associated post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder in solid organ transplant recipients: a systematic review

The use of Epstein-Barr virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (EBV-CTLs) in adoptive immunotherapy in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patients with post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) has demonstrated safety and effectiveness. EBV-CTLs might also be the effective treatment of refractory PTLD of solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipients. Two independent assessors searched Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from their inception to November 2020. Eleven studies with 76 patients (42, 55% male) were included. We extracted the data and completed the quality assessments. Most of the studies were from Europe and the USA. Liver and kidney transplantation accounted for most of the transplant types. Thirty-five (46.1%) patients were diagnosed with monomorphic PTLD, and B lymphocyte type was the most common. All the patients received primary treatment for PTLD while it was ineffective. CTLs included autologous EBV-CTLs (15/76, 22%) and HLA-matched third-party EBV-CTLs (61/76, 78%). The response rate for EBV-CTL treatment of refractory PTLD was 66%. Of 50 patients, 36 achieved complete remission and 14 achieved partial remission. EBV-DNA level decreased in 39 patients. Adverse reactions were rare and mild. We conclude that adoptive therapy with EBV-specific CTLs is safe, well-tolerated, and effective in PTLD.

Kidney Transplant T Cell-Mediated Rejection Occurring After Anti-CD19 CAR T-Cell Therapy for Refractory Aggressive Burkitt-like Lymphoma With 11q Aberration: A Case Report

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder is a growing complication of kidney transplantation and is associated with a poor prognosis. Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is an important new treatment option modifying the outcome of refractory hematological cancers. Here, we report the case of a 40-year-old kidney transplant recipient who developed a Burkitt-like lymphoma with 11q aberration 5 years after transplantation. After 3 unsuccessful lines of chemotherapy, it was decided to treat the patient with anti-CD19 CAR T cells as a salvage therapy. Three months after CAR T-cell infusion, she experienced a grade IIB T cell-mediated rejection with severe tubulitis (T3), slight interstitial inflammation (I1), and severe intimal arteritis (V2) with blood suffusion. Among T cells infiltrating the graft, some of them expressed the anti-CD19 CAR. CAR T cells within the graft and in blood samples were also detected by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction. Function of the kidney transplant improved after corticosteroid treatment and remained stable. However, lymphoma progressed, with a massive pulmonary mass leading to the patient's death 10 months after CAR T-cell infusion.

Case Report: Successful Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy in Haploidentical-Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Patients With Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder

Background

Epstein–Barr virus-associated post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (EBV-PTLD) is a potentially fatal complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Rituximab has been proven to dramatically improve the prognosis of patients with EBV reactivation and PTLD. However, reports on the curative management of refractory PTLD are scarce.

Case Presentation

In this report, we describe the successful management of two patients with EBV-PTLD with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy.

Conclusion

The present results demonstrated that patients with EBV-PTLD may benefit from CAR-T therapy and that the toxicity is manageable. Further studies are needed to verify these findings.

CAR-T therapy in solid transplant recipients with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease: case report and literature review

Patients with postransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) who are refractory to rituximab-based regimens have extremely poor prognosis. Data is lacking in the setting of solid organ transplantation (SOT)-related PTLD treated with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy. Moreover, limited information is available on the influence of concomitant immunosuppressive drugs on CAR-T function. Here, we describe the clinical outcome in one PTLD patient and propose a strategy for tailoring immunosuppressive treatment and organ monitoring in patients with kidney allografts after CAR-T infusion. This report also reviews the limited published data in the setting of SOT-related PTLD treated with CAR-T, which appears to be a feasible treatment in this clinical scenario, without severe toxicity and capable of inducing sustained responses. A noteworthy finding is that in most reported cases patients underwent complete or partial discontinuation of immunosuppressive drugs, with only one documented case of allograft rejection.

Acute Kidney Injury Following Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy for B-Cell Lymphoma in a Kidney Transplant Recipient

Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a newer and effective therapeutic option approved for patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Acute kidney injury is a complication of CAR T-cell therapy that can result in kidney failure. In most cases, it is thought to be related to hemodynamic changes due to cytokine release syndrome. Kidney biopsy in this clinical scenario is usually not performed. We report on a kidney transplant recipient in his 40s who developed a posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder of B-cell origin refractory to conventional treatments and received anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy as compassionate treatment. Beginning on day 12 after CAR T-cell infusion, in the absence of clinical symptoms, a progressive decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate of the kidney graft occurred. A subsequent allograft biopsy showed mild tubulointerstitial lymphocyte infiltrates, falling into a Banff borderline-changes category and resembling an acute immunoallergic tubulointerstitial nephritis. Neither CAR T cells nor lymphomatous B cells were detected within the graft cellular infiltrates, suggesting an indirect mechanism of kidney injury. Although kidney graft function partially recovered after steroid therapy, the posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder progressed and the patient died 7 months later.

Successful Treatment of Pediatric Refractory Burkitt Lymphoma PTLD after Liver Transplantation using Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy

In the immunocompromised setting, recipients of solid-organ or hematopoietic stem-cell transplants carry an increased risk of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). Burkitt lymphoma (BL) PTLD is a rare form of monomorphic B-cell PTLD, which lacks a standard best treatment. Here, we report the successful treatment of refractory BL-PTLD with autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. A male patient was diagnosed with BL-PTLD, with an increasing Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) viral load, at 21 months after undergoing living liver transplantation from his mother due to neonatal biliary atresia. After 10 cycles rituximab +/- intensive chemotherapy and surgical tumor resection, the tumors significantly advanced. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue, revealing one mutation in exon 5, TP53: p.A159 V, which may be associated with chemo-resistance. Thus, treatment was started with autologous anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy. We administered 9.0 × 10⁶/kg autologous anti-CD19 CAR T-cells, after conditioning with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine. Unexpectedly, the patient experienced only mild (Grade II) cytokine release syndrome (CRS) without neurotoxicity. Finally, he went into complete remission (CR), and has achieved 16-month event-free survival to date. In addition, liver function has remained stably within the normal range without any immunosuppressive therapy. The literature includes only five previously reported BL cases treated with CAR T-cell therapy. In conclusion, the present case suggests that autologous anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy may represent a new therapeutic option for some cases of refractory BL-PTLD.Clinical trial number: ChiCTR2000032211.

Post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a severe complication of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), occurring in a setting of immune suppression and dysregulation. The disease is in most cases driven by the reactivation of the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), which induces B cell proliferation through different pathomechanisms. Beyond EBV, many factors, variably dependent on HSCT-related immunosuppression, contribute to the disease development. PTLDs share several features with primary lymphomas, though clinical manifestations may be different, frequently depending on extranodal involvement. According to the WHO classification, histologic examination is required for diagnosis, allowing also to distinguish among PTLD subtypes. However, in cases of severe and abrupt presentation, a diagnosis based on a combination of imaging studies and EBV-load determination is accepted. Therapies include prophylactic and pre-emptive interventions, aimed at eradicating EBV proliferation before symptoms onset, and targeted treatments. Among them, rituximab has emerged as first-line option, possibly combined with a reduction of immunosuppression, while EBV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes are effective and safe alternatives. Though prognosis remains poor, survival has markedly improved following the adoption of the aforementioned treatments. The validation of innovative, combined approaches is the future challenge.