Epidemiology and long-term outcomes of cytomegalovirus DNAemia and disease in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients

Current and Emerging Antiviral Agents in the Prevention and Treatment of Cytomegalovirus in Pediatric Transplant Recipients

Despite current prophylaxis regimens, cytomegalovirus (CMV) is common in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and solid organ transplantation (SOT) and remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Newer antiviral medications are reshaping the landscape for prevention and treatment of CMV DNAemia, infection, and disease. Letermovir is approved for CMV prevention in adult HCT patients and is attractive due to the absence of marrow suppression seen with ganciclovir/valganciclovir. Letermovir should not be routinely used for CMV treatment due to its low threshold for resistance. Maribavir is approved for the treatment of refractory or resistant CMV disease in HCT and SOT recipients ≥12 years of age, though it has no current role in CMV prevention. More research is needed to fully elucidate the roles, efficacy, and safety of these newer agents in prevention and treatment of CMV in pediatric transplant recipients.

Body surface area compared to body weight dosing of valganciclovir is associated with increased toxicity in pediatric solid organ transplantation recipients

Optimal dosing of valganciclovir (VGCV) for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prevention in pediatric solid organ transplantation recipients (SOTR) is controversial. Dosing calculated based on body surface area (BSA) and creatinine clearance is recommended but simplified body weight (BW) dosing is often prescribed. We conducted a retrospective 6-center study to compare safety and efficacy of these strategies in the first-year posttransplant There were 100 (24.2%) pediatric SOTR treated with BSA and 312 (75.7%) with BW dosing. CMV DNAemia was documented in 31.0% vs 23.4% (P = .1) at any time during the first year and breakthrough DNAemia in 16% vs 12.2% (P = .3) of pediatric SOTR receiving BSA vs BW dosing, respectively. However, neutropenia (50% vs 29.3%, P <.001), lymphopenia (51% vs 15.0%, P <.001), and acute kidney injury causing treatment modification (8.0% vs 1.8%, P <.001) were documented more frequently during prophylaxis in pediatric SOTR receiving BSA vs BW dosing. The adjusted odds ratio of VGCV-attributed toxicities comparing BSA and BW dosing was 2.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-3.7] for neutropenia, 7.0 (95% CI, 3.9-12.4) for lymphopenia, and 4.6 (95% CI, 2.2-9.3) for premature discontinuation or dose reduction of VGCV, respectively. Results demonstrate that BW dosing is associated with significantly less toxicity without any increase in CMV DNAemia.

Update on Epidemiology and Outcomes of Infection in Pediatric Organ Transplant Recipients

Pediatric solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are at risk for infection following transplantation. Data from adult SOT recipients are often used to guide prevention and treatment of infections associated with organ transplantation in children. This article highlights key recent pediatric SOT-specific publications for an array of infectious complications of organ transplantation. Attention is given to areas of need for future study.

Incidence of cytomegalovirus DNAemia in pediatric kidney, liver, and heart transplant recipients: Efficacy and risk factors associated with failure of weight-based dosed valganciclovir prophylaxis

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is associated with morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR). Valganciclovir (VGC) is extensively used for prophylaxis. Optimal dosing in children, risk factors for failure, and the impact of dose adjustments on CMV DNAemia is not well established.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study of pediatric SOTR transplanted between 2010-2018 evaluated the epidemiology of CMV DNAemia and used Cox-regression to assess the risk factors for CMV DNAemia within one-year following SOTR.

RESULTS

In 393 pediatric SOTR (heart [96, 24.4%], kidney [180, 45.6%], liver [117, 29.8%]; median age 9.5 ± 0.3 years), overall CMV DNAemia incidence was 6.6/10 000 days (95%CI 5.1/10 000-7.9/10 000) and varied by organ groups: heart 8.2/10 000 days (95%CI 4.9/10 000-11.4/10 000), kidney 5.8/10 000 days (95%CI 3.9/10 000-7.8/10 000), liver 6.2/10 000 days (95%CI 3.7/10 000-8.7/10 000). CMV DNAemia was detected in 75 of 275 (27.2%) patients who received prophylaxis (40 cases occurred during prophylaxis and 35 occurred after completion of prophylaxis). The median VGC dose given according to institutional weight-based algorithm was approximately 1.5-fold lower than the manufacturer-recommended dose. This discordance was more prominent at younger age groups (3.2-fold lower in <2-year-old [100 mg versus 325 mg], 2.5-fold lower in <6-year-old [200 mg versus 447 mg]). Dose reduction due to adverse events was an independent risk factor for breakthrough CMV DNAemia (hazard ratio 2.2, 95%CI 1.2-3.8) among patients with similar age, CMV risk stratification, starting VGC dose, immunosuppressive therapy, and organ group.

CONCLUSION

CMV events occurred while on VGC prophylaxis. Weight-based VGC may prevent supratherapeutic VGC exposure especially in younger children. Dose reduction of VGC prophylaxis for adverse event management places patients at an increased risk for CMV DNAemia suggesting other agents with fewer adverse effects should be considered and need to be studied in children.

CMV infection and management among pediatric solid organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in pediatric solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. However, the impact of asymptomatic CMV infections (ie, DNAemia) on clinical outcomes is not well established.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of children undergoing first SOT at our institution from January 2012 to June 2018. We evaluated the epidemiology of CMV infections and performed multivariable Cox regression to assess the association between CMV DNAemia without disease or CMV disease (syndrome or end-organ disease) on negative outcomes (death, re-transplantation, or moderate/severe rejection) within the first year after SOT.

RESULTS

Among 271 individuals, 43 (15.9%) developed ≥1 CMV infection during the first year after SOT. There were 56 unique CMV infections including 14 episodes of CMV disease. In 167 patients offered CMV prophylaxis, only 8 (4.8%) developed their first CMV DNAemia episode while on prophylaxis 32 developed CMV DNAemia after prophylaxis completion; only 1 episode of CMV disease occurred while on antiviral prophylaxis. When accounting for receipt of ATG, oral steroids, and number of immunosuppressives on a given day, CMV disease was more strongly associated with negative outcomes (Hazard Ratio (HR): 3.28, 95% CI: 0.73-14.64; p = .12) than CMV DNAemia without disease (HR 1.42, 95% CI: 0.19- 10.79; p = .74), although not to a statistically significant degree.

CONCLUSIONS

Most CMV infections occurred after completion of antiviral prophylaxis. CMV disease was more strongly associated with negative outcomes than asymptomatic CMV DNAemia and should be the focus of CMV prevention practices.