Impact of the new UNOS donor heart allocation system on waitlist outcomes and early posttransplant mortality among adults with congenital heart disease

Medium to long-term ventricular assist device support in adults with congenital heart disease

Heart failure is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in adults with congenital heart disease. However, for many in this population, heart transplantation is not possible or requires longer wait times, necessitating prolonged circulatory support. The medium to long-term durable ventricular assist device therapy provides a possible solution. We analyzed outcomes of 9 patients with congenital heart disease and at least 3 years of durable mechanical support, all age 18 or older at the time of ventricular assist device implantation at our affiliated pediatric and adult hospitals. Palliated congenital anatomies varied and included biventricular physiologies as well as single ventricles with Fontan circulation. The median duration of support was 4.2 years, including 3 patients successfully bridged to transplant, averaging 2.1 years on the waitlist. Device-related complications were infrequent with HeartMate 3, a feasible and sustainable option for either bridge to transplant or destination strategies in adults with congenital heart disease.

The Year in Cardiothoracic Transplant Anesthesia: Selected Highlights From 2022 Part II: Cardiac Transplantation

These highlights focus on research published in the year 2022 and is divided into preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative sections. The preoperative section includes research on the assessment and optimization of candidates for heart transplantation; donor optimization and the use of extended donors; organ protection systems; donation after circulatory death allografts; recipient factors including cannabis use, sex, race, and comorbidities such as obesity, diabetes mellitus, and peripartum cardiomyopathy; the effects of the 2018 heart allocation policy change on waitlist and postoperative mortality; updates on heart transplantation in patients with coronavirus disease 2019; in pediatric patients; and those who require a bridge to transplant. The intraoperative section includes the use of a multidisciplinary team, a proposed transfusion algorithm, bench surgery on the allograft, and size matching. The postoperative section focuses on the research on the development and management of tricuspid regurgitation, echocardiography, arrhythmia management, and, finally, xenotransplantation.

Extended Donor Criteria Outcomes in Adult Congenital Heart Disease Patients Undergoing Heart Transplantation in the United States

Background: There are very few published outcomes for the use of extended criteria donor (ECD) organs in adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients undergoing cardiac transplantation. We investigated outcomes with the use of ECD organs in this population. We hypothesized that ECD organs may be safely used in this population in patients who are younger and carry less vascular and renal disease than the general cardiac transplant population. Methods: United Network of Organ Sharing data from all ACHD heart transplant recipients between October 18, 2018, and September 30, 2023, was analyzed. Patients were grouped by ECD transplantation. The primary outcome of interest was one-year survival. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, posttransplant stroke, retransplantation, kidney transplantation, dialysis, pacemaker implantation, and rejection. Results: Extended criteria donor organs were utilized in 39.1% (200/512) of ACHD heart transplantation cases. There was marked regional variation in the use of ECD organs. Extended criteria donor criteria in this population were solely met by ischemic time ≥4 h in 89.5% (179/200) of cases. Transplantation with ECD donors was associated with lower survival (one-year survival 82.76% vs 90.62%). A multivariate Cox regression analysis suggested a hazard ratio of 1.96 with the use of these organs. Conclusion: Compared with organs accepted under traditional donor criteria, ECD organs appear to compromise short- and long-term survival in ACHD transplant candidates.

Mechanical circulatory support devices in adults with congenital heart disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Mechanical circulatory support is used frequently as a method of stabilizing patients with end stage heart failure who are unable to safely await allograft availability. While this technology has been fundamentally important in supporting patients with normal cardiac anatomy, it is still used infrequently in adult patients with congenital heart disease and end-stage heart failure. Here, we review the data on mechanical circulatory support technology in this small but growing population of patients with chronic heart disease prone to the development of circulatory failure.

RECENT FINDINGS

Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has been increasingly employed in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) as a bridge to transplant. The new United Network for Organ Sharing listing system favoring temporary MCS use with a higher listing status offers another tool to stabilize ACHD patients and potentially shorten wait times. Both temporary and Durable MCS could help improve transplant candidacy and posttransplant outcomes in select groups of ACHD patients.

SUMMARY

Durable and temporary MCS have the potential to significantly improve access to transplant and overall transplant outcomes in ACHD patients.

Utilization and outcomes of expanded criteria donors in adults with congenital heart disease

BACKGROUND

Use of donation after circulatory death (DCD) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) positive donors in heart transplantation have increased the donor pool. Given poor waitlist outcomes in the adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) population, we investigated waitlist outcomes associated with willingness to consider DCD and HCV+ offers and post-transplant outcomes following HCV+ and DCD transplantation for these candidates.

METHODS

Using the United Network for Organ Sharing database, we identified adult ACHD candidates and recipients listed or transplanted, respectively, between 01/01/2016 and 09/30/2023 for the HCV analysis and between 12/01/2019 and 09/30/2023 for the DCD analysis. Among candidates, we compared the cumulative incidence of transplant, with waitlist death/deterioration as a competing risk, by willingness to consider HCV+ and DCD offers. Among recipients of HCV+ (vs HCV-) and DCD (vs brain death [DBD]) transplants, we compared perioperative outcomes and post-transplant survival.

RESULTS

Of 1,436 ACHD candidates from 01/01/2016 to 09/30/2023, 37.0% were willing to consider HCV+ heart offers. Of 886 ACHD candidates from 12/01/2019 to 09/30/2023, 15.5% were willing to consider DCD offers. On adjusted analysis, willingness to consider HCV+ offers was associated with 84% increased likelihood of transplant, and willingness to consider DCD offers was associated with 56% increased likelihood of transplant. Of 904 transplants between 01/01/2016 and 09/30/2023, 6.4% utilized HCV+ donors, and of 540 transplants between 12/01/2019 and 09/30/2023, 6.9% utilized DCD donors. Recipients of HCV+ (vs HCV-) and DCD (vs DBD) heart transplants had similar likelihood of perioperative outcomes and 1-year survival.

CONCLUSIONS

ACHD candidates who were willing to consider HCV+ and DCD offers were more likely to be transplanted and had similar post-transplant outcomes compared to recipients of HCV- and DBD organs.

The Impact of Local Programmatic Decisions on Outcomes in Transplant-Listed Adults With Congenital Heart Disease

BACKGROUND

We investigated variables impacting waitlist times and negative waitlist outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) who were waiting for orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) after the 2018 allocation change.

METHODS

Adult candidates for OHT who were listed between 10/18/2018 and 12/31/2022 in the United Network for Organ Sharing database were categorized as ACHD vs non-ACHD. Waitlist time and time to upgrade for those upgraded into status 1-3 were compared by using rank-sum tests. Death/delisting for deterioration was assessed by using Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard ratios (SHRs).

RESULTS

Of 15,424 OHT candidates, 589 (3.8%) were ACHD. ACHD vs non-ACHD candidates had less urgent status at initial listing (4.2% vs 4.7% listed at status 1; 17.2% vs 23.7% listed at status 2; P < 0.001), but not final listing (5.9% vs 7.6% final status 1; 35.6% vs 36.8% final status 2; P < 0.001). ACHD vs non-ACHD candidates upgraded into status 1 (65.0 vs 30.0 days; P = 0.09) and status 2 (113.0 vs 64.0 days; P = 0.003) spent longer times on the waitlist. ACHD vs non-ACHD candidates spent longer times waiting for an upgrade into status 1 (51.4 vs 17.6 days; P = 0.027) and status 2 (76.7 vs 34.7 days; P = 0.003). Once upgraded, there was no difference between groups in waitlist time to status 1 (9.7 vs 5.5 days = 0.66). ACHD vs non-ACHD candidates with a final status of 1 (20.0% vs 8.6%; SHR 2.47 [95%CI = 1.19-5.16]; P = 0.02) and 2 (8.9% vs 2.3%; SHR 3.59 [95%CI = 2.18-5.91]; P < 0.001) experienced higher rates of death and deterioration.

CONCLUSIONS

ACHD candidates have longer waitlist times, have lower priority status at initial listing, wait longer for upgrades, and have higher mortality rates at the same final status as non-ACHD candidates, suggesting that they are being upgraded too late.

Impact of new allocation policy on waitlist and transplant outcomes of adult congenital heart patients supported with ECMO

BACKGROUND

The use of ECMO as a bridge to heart transplantation has been growing rapidly in all heart transplant recipients since the implementation of the new UNOS allocation policy; however, the impact on adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients is not known.

METHODS

We analyzed the UNOS data (2015-2021) for ACHD patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) during the waitlist, before and after October 2018, to assess the impact on the waitlist and posttransplant outcomes. We compared the characteristics and outcomes of ACHD patients with or without ECMO use during the waitlist and pre- and postpolicy changes.

RESULTS

A total of 23 821 patients underwent heart transplantation, and only 918 (4%) had ACHD. Out of all ACHD patients undergoing heart transplants, 6% of patients in the prepolicy era and 7.6% in the postpolicy era were on ECMO at the time of listing. Those on ECMO were younger and sicker compared to the rest of the ACHD cohort. Those on ECMO had similar profiles pre- and postpolicy change; however, there was a very significant decrease in the waitlist time [136 days (IQR 29-384) vs. 38 days (IQR 11-108), p = 0.01]. There was no difference in waitlist mortality; however, competing risk analyses showed a higher likelihood of transplantation (51% vs. 29%) and a lower likelihood of death or deterioration (31% vs. 42%) postpolicy change. Long-term outcomes posttransplant for those supported with ECMO compared to the non-ECMO cohort are similar for ACHD patients, although there was higher attrition in the first year for the ECMO cohort.

CONCLUSION

The new allocation policy has resulted in shorter waitlist times and a higher likelihood of transplantation for ACHD patients supported by ECMO. However, the appropriate use of ECMO and the underuse of durable circulatory support devices in this population need further exploration.

Waitlist Outcomes for Pediatric Heart Transplantation in the Current Era: An Analysis of the Pediatric Heart Transplant Society Database

BACKGROUND

Waitlist mortality (WM) remains elevated in pediatric heart transplantation. Allocation policy is a potential tool to help improve WM. This study aims to identify patients at highest risk for WM to potentially inform future allocation policy changes.

METHODS

The Pediatric Heart Transplant Society database was queried for patients <18 years of age indicated for heart transplantation between January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2021. Waitlist mortality was defined as death while awaiting transplant or removal from the waitlist due to clinical deterioration. Because WM is low after the first year, analysis was limited to the first 12 months on the heart transplant list. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank testing was conducted to compare unadjusted survival between groups. Cox proportional hazard models were created to determine risk factors for WM. Subgroup analysis was performed for status 1A patients based on body surface area (BSA) at time of listing, cardiac diagnosis, and presence of mechanical circulatory support.

RESULTS

In total 5974 children met study criteria of which 3928 were status 1A, 1012 were status 1B, 963 were listed status 2, and 65 were listed status 7. Because of the significant burden of WM experienced by 1A patients, further analysis was performed in only patients indicated as 1A. Within that group of patients, those with smaller size and lower eGFR had higher WM, whereas those patients without congenital heart disease or support from a ventricular assist device (VAD) at time of listing had decreased WM. In the smallest size cohort, cardiac diagnoses other than dilated cardiomyopathy were risk factors for WM. Previous cardiac surgery was a risk factor in the 0.3 to 0.7 m2 and >0.7 m2 BSA groups. VAD support was associated with lower WM other than in the single ventricle cohort, where VAD was associated with higher WM. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and mechanical ventilation were associated with increased risk of WM in all cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

There is significant variability in WM among status-1A patients. Potential refinements to current allocation system should factor in the increased WM risk we identified in patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or mechanical ventilation, single ventricle congenital heart disease on VAD support and small children with congenital heart disease, restrictive cardiomyopathy, or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Characterizing Adaptive Changes and Patient Survival After 2018 Donor Allocation Restructuring: A UNOS Database Analysis

PURPOSE

We sought to characterize adaptive changes to the revised United Network for Organ Sharing donor heart allocation policy and estimate long-term survival trends for heart transplant (HTx) recipients.

METHODS

Patients listed for HTx between October 17, 2013 and September 30, 2021 were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing database, and stratified into pre- and postpolicy revision groups. Subanalyses were performed to examine trends in device utilization for extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO), durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD), intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), microaxial support (Impella), and no mechanical circulatory support (non-MCS). Survival data post-HTx were fitted to parametric distributions and extrapolated to 5 years.

RESULTS

We identified 27,523 HTx waitlist candidates during the study period, most of whom (n = 16,376) were waitlisted in the prepolicy change period. Overall, 19,554 patients underwent HTx during the study period (pre: 12,037 and post: 7517). Listings increased after the policy change for ECMO ( P < 0.01), Impella ( P < 0.01), and IABP ( P < 0.01) patients. Listings for LVAD ( P < 0.01) and non-MCS ( P < 0.01) patients decreased. HTx increased for ECMO ( P < 0.01), Impella ( P < 0.01), and IABP ( P < 0.01) patients after the policy change and decreased for LVAD ( P < 0.01) and non-MCS ( P < 0.01) patients. Waitlist survival increased for the overall ( P < 0.01), ECMO ( P < 0.01), IABP ( P < 0.01), and non-MCS ( P < 0.01) groups. Waitlist survival did not differ for the LVAD ( P = 0.8) and Impella ( P = 0.1) groups. Post-transplant survival decreased for the overall ( P < 0.01), LVAD ( P < 0.01), and non-MCS ( P < 0.01) populations.

CONCLUSIONS

Allocation policy revisions have contributed to greater utilization of ECMO, Impella, and IABP, decreased utilization of LVADs and non-MCS, increased waitlist survival, and decreased post-HTx survival.

Racial and Gender Disparities in Transplantation of Hepatitis C+ Hearts and Lungs

BACKGROUND

Transplanting organs from hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected donors into HCV-negative recipients has led to thousands of more transplants in the United States since 2016. Studies have demonstrated disparities in utilization of kidneys from these donors due to gender and education. It is still unknown, however, if the same disparities are seen in heart and lung transplantation.

METHODS

We used Organ Procurement and Transplantation/United Network for Organ Sharing data on all isolated heart and lung transplants from November 1, 2018, to March 31, 2023, classifying donors based on their HCV nucleic acid test (NAT) result: HCV-NAT- vs HCV-NAT+. We fit separate mixed-effects logistic regression models (outcome: HCV-NAT+ donor) for heart and lung transplants. Primary covariates included (1) race/ethnicity, (2) sex, (3) education level, (4) insurance type, and (5) transplant year.

RESULTS

The study included 26,108 adults (14,189 isolated heart transplant recipients and 11,919 isolated lung transplant recipients). A total of 993 (7.0%) heart transplants involved an HCV-NAT+ donor, compared to 457 (3.8%) lung transplants. In multivariable models among all isolated heart transplant recipients, women were significantly less likely to receive an HCV-NAT+ donor heart (odds ratio [OR]: 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.67-0.92, p = 0.003), as were Asian patients (OR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.31-0.86, p = 0.01). In multivariable models among all isolated lung transplant recipients, Asians were significantly less likely to receive HCV-NAT+ transplants (OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.12-0.77, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

There are disparities in utilization of heart and lungs from HCV-NAT+ donors, with women and Asian patients being significantly less likely to receive these transplants.

Trends and outcomes of heart transplantation in adults with congenital heart disease

OBJECTIVES

Heart transplantation for adult congenital heart disease is complicated and associated with challenging pretransplant support, long waiting and high early post-transplant mortality. We explored if surgical and medical advances and allocation system changes have affected outcomes.

METHODS

From United Network for Organ Sharing database, adults with congenital heart disease listed for heart transplantation were queried. To explore practice and outcome trends, patients were divided into 4 eras (eras 1-3: nearly 3 equal periods from 1992 to 2018, era 4: after 2018, corresponding with new allocation system). Univariate and multivariable analysis was performed to evaluate outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 2737 patients were listed. There was gradual increase in listed and transplanted patients, along with significant increase in use of mechanical support, simultaneous kidney and liver transplantation. While proportion of transplanted remained constant, there was decrease in proportion delisted/died after listing (P = 0.01) and waiting list duration (P = 0.01), especially in era 4. Thirty-day post-transplant mortality remains high; however, it has significantly improved starting era 3 (P = 0.01). Current survival at 1-year and 5-years is 85% and 65%, with improvement mainly related to decreased early death. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with survival were lower glomerular filtration rate (hazard ratio = 0.99, P = 0.042), bilirubin (hazard ratio = 1.17, P<0.001) and mechanical ventilation (hazard ratio = 2.3, P=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Heart transplantation in adults with congenital heart disease is increasing, along with added complexity, higher usage of pretransplant mechanical support and simultaneous organ transplantation. Despite that, more complex patients do not experience worse outcomes. Early mortality improved but remains high. New donor allocation system allowed shorter waiting time and higher proportion transplanted without altering early mortality.

Waitlist Outcomes in Candidates With Rare Causes of Heart Failure After Implementation of the 2018 French Heart Allocation Scheme

BACKGROUND

In 2018, an algorithm-based allocation system for heart transplantation (HT) was implemented in France. Its effect on access to HT of patients with rare causes of heart failure (HF) has not been assessed.

METHODS

In this national study, including adults listed for HT between 2018 and 2020, we analyzed waitlist and posttransplant outcomes of candidates with rare causes of HF (restrictive cardiomyopathy [RCM], hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and congenital heart disease). The primary end point was death on the waitlist or delisting for clinical deterioration. Secondary end points included access to HT and posttransplant mortality. The cumulative incidence of waitlist mortality estimated with competing risk analysis and incidence of transplantation were compared between diagnosis groups. The association of HF cause with outcomes was determined by Fine-Gray or Cox models.

RESULTS

Overall, 1604 candidates were listed for HT. At 1 year postlisting, 175 patients met the primary end point and 1040 underwent HT. Candidates listed for rare causes of HF significantly differed in baseline characteristics and had more frequent score exceptions compared with other cardiomyopathies (31.3%, 32.0%, 36.4%, and 16.7% for patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, RCM, congenital heart disease, and other cardiomyopathies). The cumulative incidence of death on the waitlist and probability of HT were similar between diagnosis groups (P=0.17 and 0.40, respectively). The adjusted risk of death or delisting for clinical deterioration did not significantly differ between candidates with rare and common causes of HF (subdistribution hazard ratio (HR): hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.19-1.38]; P=0.18; RCM, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.42-2.58]; P=0.94; congenital heart disease, 1.82 [95% CI, 0.78-4.26]; P=0.17). Similarly, the access to HT did not significantly differ between causes of HF (hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: HR, 1.18 [95% CI, 0.92-1.51]; P=0.19; RCM: HR, 1.19 [95% CI, 0.90-1.58]; P=0.23; congenital heart disease: HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.53-1.09]; P=0.14). RCM was an independent risk factor for 1-year posttransplant mortality (HR, 2.12 [95% CI, 1.06-4.24]; P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows equitable waitlist outcomes among HT candidates whatever the indication for transplantation with the new French allocation scheme.

Anatomical Compliance of Cavopulmonary Assist Device Designs: A Virtual Fitting Study in Fontan Patients

Several device designs for cavopulmonary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) are under investigation, however, challenged by the Fontan population's heterogeneity in size, cardiovascular and thoracic anatomy. This study aimed to preclinically assess the anatomical compliance of proposed device designs in silico. Representative double- and single-outlet cavopulmonary assist device (CPAD) designs were virtually implanted into CT imaging data of 10 patients previously palliated with total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC) for functionally univentricular hearts. Anatomical device compatibility was characterized concerning pump proximity to cardiovascular, respiratory and thoracic structures, as well as pump in- and outflow graft configuration. In 10 Fontan patients with a median age of 10.4 years (interquartile range [IQR] 5.0-15.3 years) and a median body surface area of 1.09 m2 (IQR 0.76-1.28 m2), implantation of a double-outlet CPAD was feasible in 1 patient (10%). In all other, adverse device intersection with the trachea and (neo-)aorta, or posterior pulmonary artery outflow graft kinking were observed. A single-outlet design permitted enhanced device mobilization adapting to individual anatomical conditions, resulting in device fit in nine of 10 patients (90%). Despite vast anatomical variations among single ventricle patients, a single-outlet device design may provide intracorporeal cavopulmonary MCS to a broad spectrum of failing Fontan patients.

Novel Therapeutic Strategies in Heart Failure in Adult Congenital Heart Disease: of Medicines and Devices

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This paper reviews the latest literature on the growing field of heart failure in the adult congenital heart disease population.

RECENT FINDINGS

After highlighting the increasing prevalence and a few of the unique potential causes, including the concept of early senescence, this review begins with novel medical management strategies such as the angiotensin II receptor blocker and neprilysin inhibitors and sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors. Then, it addresses the latest applications of percutaneous techniques like implantable hemodynamic monitoring, transcatheter pulmonary and aortic valve replacement, and mitral clips. Cardiac resynchronization therapy and novel lymphatic system imaging and intervention are then described. Finally, the use of mechanical support devices, temporary and durable, is discussed as well as heart and combined heart and liver transplantation. There have been recent exciting advances in the strategies used to manage adult congenital heart disease patients with heart failure. As this population continues to grow, it is likely we will see further rapid evolution in this field.

Challenges with the current United Network for Organ Sharing heart allocation system

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The revised United States heart organ allocation system was launched in October 2018. In this review, we summarize this United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) policy and describe intended and unintended consequences.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although early studies published after the change suggested postheart transplant survival declined at 6 months and 1 year, recent publications with longer follow-up time have confirmed comparable posttransplant survival in adjusted models and several patient cohorts. Moreover, the new allocation decreased overall waitlist time from 112 to 39 days ( P  < 0.001). Mean ischemic time increased because of greater distances traveled to acquire donor hearts under broader sharing. Despite the intention to decrease exception requests by expanding the number of priority tiers to provide more granular risk stratification, ∼30% of patients remain waitlisted under exception status. Left-ventricular assist device (LVAD) implants are declining and the number of LVAD patients on the transplant list has decreased dramatically after the allocation system change.

SUMMARY

As the next allocation system is developed, it is imperative to curtail the use of temporary mechanical support as a strategy solely for listing purposes, identify attributes that more clearly stratify the severity of illness, provide greater oversight of exception requests, and address concerns regarding patients with durable LVADs.

Incidence and Outcomes of Advanced Heart Failure in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease

BACKGROUND

There are limited data about the stage D heart failure (advanced HF) in adults with congenital heart disease. Our study objectives were (1) to determine the incidence of new-onset advanced HF in patients and the relationship between advanced HF and all-cause mortality and (2) to determine the relationship between therapies for advanced HF and all-cause mortality.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of adults with congenital heart disease at Mayo Clinic (2003-2019). We defined advanced HF using the European Society of Cardiology diagnostic criteria for advanced HF. Therapies received by the patients with advanced HF were classified into 3 mutually exclusive groups (treatment pathways): (1) conventional cardiac intervention, (2) transplant listing, and (3) palliative care.

RESULTS

Of 5309 patients without advanced HF at baseline assessment, 432 (8%) developed advanced HF during follow-up (1.1%/y), and the incidence of advanced HF was higher in patients with severe or complex congenital heart disease. Onset of advanced HF was associated with 6-fold increase in the risk of mortality. Conventional cardiac intervention was associated with significantly higher risk of mortality as compared to transplant listing. The longer the interval from the initial onset of advanced HF to transplant evaluation, the lower the odds of being listed for transplant.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these data, we postulate that early identification of patients with advanced HF, and a timely referral for transplant evaluation (instead of conventional cardiac intervention) may offer the best chance of survival for these critically ill patients. Further studies are required to validate this postulation.

Observations and Single-Center Outcomes in Orthotopic Heart Transplant for Patients With Adult Congenital Heart Disease: A Call for Equity and Parity

BACKGROUND

For persons with adult congenital heart disease (ACHD), optimum patient selection and eligibility for orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) is not well defined. There is difficulty quantifying risk in patients with ACHD, leading to variability in OHT listing time and status. They are often disadvantaged due to a lack of mechanical support options, a shortage of congenital surgeons, and encounters with risk adverse health care programs. We examined patient characteristics and outcomes of a contemporary cohort of patients with ACHD undergoing OHT at a single high-volume Adult Congenital Heart Association accredited transplant center.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 49 consecutive patients with ACHD who underwent OHT from November 2010 through March 2020 was performed. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Survival at 1 month, 1 year, 3 years, and 10 years was 94%, 92%, 92%, and 83%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the diversity and complexity of the population with ACHD proceeding to OHT as well as the multispecialty care needed to overcome disadvantages and optimize survival. Continued national discussions and policy adjustments will be necessary to bring parity and equity to this unique population.

Heart transplant indications, considerations and outcomes in Fontan patients: Age-related nuances, transplant listing and disease-specific indications

In the current era, 5-10% of Fontan patients die or need a transplant in childhood, and approximately 50% will experience the same fate by age 40 years. Heart transplant (HTx) can be successful for selected children and adults with Fontan circulatory failure (FCF) of any mechanism, with a 1-year post-transplant survival approaching 90% in children and 80% in the largest single-centre adult Fontan HTx experience. Protein losing enteropathy and plastic bronchitis can be expected to resolve post-transplant and limited data suggests patients with FALD who survive HTx can expect improvement in liver health. Early Fontan failure, within 12 months of Fontan completion, is not easily rescued by HTx and late referrals / failure to refer adult patients remains problematic. Very little is known about the numbers of patients not referred, turned down following assessment for HTx, or dying on the waiting list which are needed to understand the complete picture of HTx in the Fontan population and to identify where best to focus quality improvement efforts. Recent revisions to listing prioritization in Canada with considerations specific to the Fontan population aim to mitigate the fact that the status listing criteria are not tailored to the congenital heart population. Transplanting high-risk children prior to Fontan completion, developing ACHD transplant centres of expertise which can also offer combined heart-liver transplant when appropriate, and improving single ventricle mechanical support options and criteria for both adults and children may help mitigate the early post-listing mortality.