1
|
Phornkittikorn P, Kantachuvesiri S, Sobhonslidsuk A, Yingchoncharoen T, Kiertiburanakul S, Bruminhent J. SARS-CoV-2-Specific Antibodies, B Cell and T Cell Immune Responses after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccination in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients. Vaccines (Basel) 2024; 12:541. [PMID: 38793792 PMCID: PMC11125913 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12050541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Revised: 04/14/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunization against SARS-CoV-2 is essential for vulnerable solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients who are at risk of infection. However, there are concerns about suboptimal immunogenicity, especially in humoral immunity (HMI), and limited exploration of cell-mediated immune (CMI) responses. The primary objective of this study was to assess the immunogenicity of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination in SOT recipients. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate factors that affect immunogenicity and adverse events (AEs) following immunization in SOT recipients. METHODS All adult SOT recipients who received the two-dose ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine at a 12-week interval underwent measurements of HMI by evaluating anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) IgG levels and CMI by investigating SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell and B cell responses before and after complete vaccination, around 2-4 weeks post-vaccination, and compared to controls. AEs were monitored in all participants. RESULTS The study included 63 SOT recipients: 44 kidney recipients, 16 liver recipients, and 3 heart transplant recipients, along with 11 immunocompetent controls. Among SOT recipients, 36% were female, and the median (IQR) age was 52 (42-61). The median (IQR) time since transplant was 55 (28-123) months. After the second dose, the median (IQR) anti-RBD antibody levels were significantly lower in SOT recipients compared to those in the control group (8.3 [0.4-46.0] vs. 272.2 [178.1-551.6] BAU/mL, p < 0.01). This resulted in a seroconversion rate (anti-RBD antibody > 7.1 BAU/mL) of 51% among SOT recipients and 100% among controls (p = 0.008). Receiving the vaccine beyond one year post-transplant significantly affected seroconversion (OR 9.04, 95% CI 1.04-78.56, p = 0.046), and low-dose mycophenolic acid marginally affected seroconversion (OR 2.67, 95% CI 0.89-7.96, p = 0.079). RBD-specific B cell responses were also significantly lower compared to those in the control group (0 [0-4] vs. 10 [6-22] SFUs/106 PBMCs, p = 0.001). Similarly, S1- and SNMO-specific T cell responses were significantly lower compared to those in the control group (48 [16-128] vs. 216 [132-356] SFUs/106 PBMCs, p = 0.004 and 20 [4-48] vs. 92 [72-320] SFUs/106 PBMCs, p = 0.004). AEs were generally mild and spontaneously resolved. CONCLUSIONS SOT recipients who received the full two-dose ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine demonstrated significantly diminished HMI and CMI responses compared to immunocompetent individuals. Consideration should be given to administering additional vaccine doses or optimizing immunosuppressant regimens during vaccination (Thai Clinical Trial Registry: TCTR20210523002).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pattaraphorn Phornkittikorn
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand; (P.P.); (S.K.); (A.S.); (T.Y.); (S.K.)
| | - Surasak Kantachuvesiri
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand; (P.P.); (S.K.); (A.S.); (T.Y.); (S.K.)
- Ramathibodi Excellence Center for Organ Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
| | - Abhasnee Sobhonslidsuk
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand; (P.P.); (S.K.); (A.S.); (T.Y.); (S.K.)
- Ramathibodi Excellence Center for Organ Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
| | - Teerapat Yingchoncharoen
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand; (P.P.); (S.K.); (A.S.); (T.Y.); (S.K.)
- Ramathibodi Excellence Center for Organ Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
| | - Sasisopin Kiertiburanakul
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand; (P.P.); (S.K.); (A.S.); (T.Y.); (S.K.)
| | - Jackrapong Bruminhent
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand; (P.P.); (S.K.); (A.S.); (T.Y.); (S.K.)
- Ramathibodi Excellence Center for Organ Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yu B, Tamargo C, Brennan DC, Kant S. Measures to Increase Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Narrative Review. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1755. [PMID: 38140160 PMCID: PMC10748337 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11121755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Revised: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose of review: To review the data on the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines, administered by different strategies, in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs). Recent findings: COVID-19 booster vaccines were given to SOTRs as a widespread practice in many transplant centers, mostly as the third and/or fourth dose in an extended vaccine series, with a significantly improved humoral response compared with the initial two-dose scheme. However, one-third of SOTRs remained unresponsive, despite these boosters. Next steps: Vaccination with standard dosing remains the most feasible strategy for attaining protection against COVID-19. Additional booster doses and temporarily holding or reducing mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenolic acid may provide immunogenicity to vaccines, according to recent studies demonstrating some efficacy with these measures. Preexposure prophylaxis with monoclonal antibodies showed benefit in immunocompromised patients but is no longer recommended by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) due to diminished efficacy against Omicron and recent variants. Screening for the presence and titers of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies in SOTRs is not recommended in most clinical settings. T cell-based techniques are needed to evaluate vaccine efficacy and risk of infection. As SARS-CoV-2 continues to evolve, new vaccines based on conservative protein component/complexes of the COVID virus, in addition to its spike protein, are warranted to offer prolonged protection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Yu
- Department of Medicine, University of Maryland Medical Center, Midtown Campus, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA;
| | - Christina Tamargo
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA;
| | - Daniel C. Brennan
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA;
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Sam Kant
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA;
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
López V, Mazuecos A, Villanego F, López-Oliva M, Alonso A, Beneyto I, Crespo M, Díaz-Corte C, Franco A, González-Roncero F, Guirado L, Jiménez C, Juega J, Llorente S, Paul J, Rodríguez-Benot A, Ruiz JC, Sánchez-Fructuoso A, Torregrosa V, Zárraga S, Rodrigo E, Hernández D. Update of the recommendations on the management of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) in kidney transplant patients. Nefrologia 2023; 43:531-545. [PMID: 37957107 DOI: 10.1016/j.nefroe.2023.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) has had a significant impact on transplant activity in our country. Mortality and the risk of complications associated with COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients (KT) were expected to be higher due to their immunosuppressed condition and the frequent associated comorbidities. Since the beginning of the pandemic in March 2020 we have rapidly improved our knowledge about the epidemiology, clinical features and management of COVID-19 post-transplant, resulting in a better prognosis for our patients. KT units have been able to adapt their programs to this new reality, normalizing both donation and transplantation activity in our country. This manuscript presents a proposal to update the general recommendations for the prevention and treatment of infection in this highly vulnerable population such as KT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verónica López
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Nefrología, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Universidad de Málaga, Instituto Biomédico de Investigación de Málaga (IBIMA), RICORS2040 (RD21/0005/0012), Málaga, Spain.
| | | | | | | | - Angel Alonso
- Servicio de Nefrología, Complejo Hospitalario A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Isabel Beneyto
- Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Universitario Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Marta Crespo
- Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital del Mar, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), RD16/0009/0013 (ISCIII FEDER REDinREN), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carmen Díaz-Corte
- Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias (ISPA), Oviedo, Asturias, Spain
| | - Antonio Franco
- Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | | | - Luis Guirado
- Servicio de Nefrología, Fundación Puigvert, REDinREN RD16/0009/0019, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Javier Juega
- Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Trias i Pujol, REDinREN RD16/0009/0032, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Santiago Llorente
- Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| | - Javier Paul
- Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Alberto Rodríguez-Benot
- Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Reina Sofía, Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Juan Carlos Ruiz
- Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, REDinREN RD16/0009/0027, Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| | - Ana Sánchez-Fructuoso
- Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Sofía Zárraga
- Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital de Cruces, Bilbao, Vizcaya, Spain
| | - Emilio Rodrigo
- Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, REDinREN RD16/0009/0027, Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| | - Domingo Hernández
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Nefrología, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Universidad de Málaga, Instituto Biomédico de Investigación de Málaga (IBIMA), RICORS2040 (RD21/0005/0012), Málaga, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Udomkarnjananun S, Gatechompol S, Leelahavanichkul A, Kerr SJ. Cellular immune response of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1220148. [PMID: 37575225 PMCID: PMC10415203 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1220148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Evidence has demonstrated inferior humoral immune responses after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in kidney transplant recipients compared to the general population. However, data on cellular immune responses in this population have not been established. Methods We searched the MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases and included studies reporting cellular immune response rates in kidney transplant recipients after receiving SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Studies that reported factors associated with cellular immune responders or non-responders were also included (PROSPERO: CRD42022375544). Results From a total of 1,494 articles searched, 53 articles were included in the meta-analysis. In all, 21 studies assessed cellular immune response by interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (IFN-γ ELISPOT), 22 studies used interferon-γ release assay (IGRA), and 10 studies used flow cytometric analysis. The pooled response rate after two doses (standard regimen) and three doses of vaccination was 47.5% (95%CI 38.4-56.7%) and 69.1% (95%CI 56.3-80.6%) from IFN-γ ELISPOT, 25.8% (95%CI 19.7-32.4%) and 14.7% (95%CI 8.5-22.2%) from IGRA, and 73.7% (95%CI 55.2-88.8%) and 86.5% (95%CI 75.3-94.9%) from flow cytometry, respectively. Recipients with seroconversion were associated with a higher chance of having cellular immune response (OR 2.58; 95%CI 1.89-3.54). Cellular immune response in kidney transplant recipients was lower than in dialysis patients (OR 0.24; 95%CI 0.16-0.34) and the general population (OR 0.10; 95%CI 0.07-0.14). Age and immunosuppressants containing tacrolimus or corticosteroid were associated with inferior cellular immune response. Conclusion Cellular immune response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in kidney transplant recipients was lower than in dialysis patients and the general population. Age, tacrolimus, and corticosteroid were associated with poor response. Cellular immune response should also be prioritized in vaccination studies. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022375544.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suwasin Udomkarnjananun
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
- Excellence Center for Organ Transplantation (ECOT), King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
- Renal Immunology and Transplantation Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Asada Leelahavanichkul
- Center of Excellence on Translational Research in Inflammation and Immunology (CETRII), Department of Microbiology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Immunology Unit, Department of Microbiology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Stephen J. Kerr
- HIV-NAT, Thai Red Cross AIDS Research Centre, Bangkok, Thailand
- Biostatistics Excellence Centre, Research Affairs, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
López V, Mazuecos A, Villanego F, López-Oliva M, Alonso A, Beneyto I, Crespo M, Díaz-Corte C, Franco A, González-Roncero F, Guirado L, Jiménez C, Juega J, Llorente S, Paul J, Rodríguez-Benot A, Ruiz JC, Sánchez-Fructuoso A, Torregrosa V, Zárraga S, Rodrigo E, Hernández D. [Update of the recommendations on the management of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) in kidney transplant patients.]. Nefrologia 2022; 43:S0211-6995(22)00174-6. [PMID: 36405492 PMCID: PMC9664833 DOI: 10.1016/j.nefro.2022.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) has had a significant impact on transplant activity in our country. Mortality and the risk of complications associated with COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients (KT) were expected to be higher due to their immunosuppressed condition and the frequent associated comorbidities. Since the beginning of the pandemic in March 2020 we have rapidly improved our knowledge about the epidemiology, clinical features and management of COVID-19 post-transplant, resulting in a better prognosis for our patients. KT units have been able to adapt their programs to this new reality, normalizing both donation and transplantation activity in our country.This manuscript presents a proposal to update the general recommendations for the prevention and treatment of infection in this highly vulnerable population such as KT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verónica López
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Nefrología. Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Universidad de Málaga, Instituto Biomédico de Investigación de Málaga (IBIMA), RICORS2040 (RD21/0005/0012), Málaga, España
| | | | | | | | - Angel Alonso
- Servicio de Nefrología. Complejo Hospitalario A Coruña, España
| | - Isabel Beneyto
- Servicio de Nefrología. Hospital Universitario Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, España
| | - Marta Crespo
- Servicio de Nefrología. Hospital del Mar, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, España. RD16/0009/0013 (ISCIII FEDER REDinREN), España
| | - Carmen Díaz-Corte
- Servicio de Nefrología. Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias (ISPA), Asturias, España
| | - Antonio Franco
- Servicio de Nefrología. Hospital de Alicante, Alicante, España
| | | | - Luis Guirado
- Servicio de Nefrología. Fundación Puigvert, REDinREN RD16/0009/0019, Barcelona, España
| | | | - Javier Juega
- Servicio de Nefrología. Hospital Trias i Pujol, REDinREN RD16/0009/0032, Barcelona, España
| | - Santiago Llorente
- Servicio de Nefrología. Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, España
| | - Javier Paul
- Servicio de Nefrología. Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, España
| | - Alberto Rodríguez-Benot
- Servicio de Nefrología. Hospital Reina Sofía, Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba, Córdoba, España
| | - Juan Carlos Ruiz
- Servicio de Nefrología. Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, REDinREN RD16/0009/0027, Santander, España
| | - Ana Sánchez-Fructuoso
- Serivicio de Nefrología. Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, España
| | | | - Sofía Zárraga
- Servicio de Nefrología. Hospital de Cruces, Bilbao, España
| | - Emilio Rodrigo
- Servicio de Nefrología. Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, REDinREN RD16/0009/0027, Santander, España
| | - Domingo Hernández
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Nefrología. Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Universidad de Málaga, Instituto Biomédico de Investigación de Málaga (IBIMA), RICORS2040 (RD21/0005/0012), Málaga, España
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Geetha D, Kronbichler A, Rutter M, Bajpai D, Menez S, Weissenbacher A, Anand S, Lin E, Carlson N, Sozio S, Fowler K, Bignall R, Ducharlet K, Tannor EK, Wijewickrama E, Hafidz MIA, Tesar V, Hoover R, Crews D, Varnell C, Danziger-Isakov L, Jha V, Mohan S, Parikh C, Luyckx V. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the kidney community: lessons learned and future directions. Nat Rev Nephrol 2022; 18:724-737. [PMID: 36002770 PMCID: PMC9400561 DOI: 10.1038/s41581-022-00618-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has disproportionately affected patients with kidney disease, causing significant challenges in disease management, kidney research and trainee education. For patients, increased infection risk and disease severity, often complicated by acute kidney injury, have contributed to high mortality. Clinicians were faced with high clinical demands, resource shortages and novel ethical dilemmas in providing patient care. In this review, we address the impact of COVID-19 on the entire spectrum of kidney care, including acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, dialysis and transplantation, trainee education, disparities in health care, changes in health care policies, moral distress and the patient perspective. Based on current evidence, we provide a framework for the management and support of patients with kidney disease, infection mitigation strategies, resource allocation and support systems for the nephrology workforce.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Duvuru Geetha
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
| | | | - Megan Rutter
- Department of Lifespan and Population Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Divya Bajpai
- Department of Nephrology, Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College (GSMC) and the King Edward Memorial (KEM) Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Steven Menez
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Annemarie Weissenbacher
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Shuchi Anand
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Standford, California, USA
| | - Eugene Lin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Leonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy & Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Nicholas Carlson
- Department of Nephrology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Research, The Danish Heart Foundation, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Stephen Sozio
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kevin Fowler
- Principal, Voice of the Patient Inc, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Ray Bignall
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Nationwide Children's Hospital and Department of Paediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Kathryn Ducharlet
- Department of Renal Medicine, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Nephrology and Palliative Care, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Australia and Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Elliot K Tannor
- Department of Medicine, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
- Renal Unit, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Eranga Wijewickrama
- Consultant Nephrologist and Professor in the Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka
- University Medical Unit, National Hospital of Sri Lanka and National Institute of Nephrology, Dialysis & Transplantation, Colombo, Sri Lanka
| | | | - Vladimir Tesar
- Department of Nephrology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Robert Hoover
- Deming Department of Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Deidra Crews
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Charles Varnell
- Division of Nephrology & Hypertension, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
- James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Lara Danziger-Isakov
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Vivekanand Jha
- George Institute for Global Health, New Delhi, India
- School of Public Health, Imperial College, London, UK
- Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and the Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, USA
| | - Chirag Parikh
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Valerie Luyckx
- Associate Scientist, Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
- Honorary Associate Professor, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
- Nephrologist, University Childrens Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bruminhent J, Setthaudom C, Phornkittikorn P, Chaumdee P, Prasongtanakij S, Srisala S, Malathum K, Boongird S, Nongnuch A, Assanatham M, Nakgul L, Sanmeema N, Phuphuakrat A, Kiertiburanakul S. An additional dose of viral vector COVID-19 vaccine and mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in kidney transplant recipients: A randomized controlled trial (CVIM 4 study). Am J Transplant 2022; 22:2651-2660. [PMID: 35841235 PMCID: PMC9349825 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.17151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Revised: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Immunogenicity following an additional dose of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine was investigated in an extended primary series among kidney transplant (KT) recipients. Eighty-five KT participants were randomized to receive either an mRNA (M group; n = 43) or viral vector (V group; n = 42) vaccine. Among them, 62% were male, with a median (IQR) age of 50 (43-59) years and post-transplantation duration of 46 (26-82) months. At 2 weeks post-additional dose, there was no difference in the seroconversion rate between the M and V groups (70% vs. 65%, p = .63). A median (IQR) of anti-RBD antibody level was not statistically different between the M group compared with the V group (51.8 [5.1-591] vs. 28.5 [2.9-119.3] BAU/ml, p = .18). Furthermore, the percentage of participants with positive SARS-CoV-2 surrogate virus neutralization test results was not statistically different between groups (20% vs. 15%, p = .40). S1-specific T cell and RBD-specific B cell responses were also comparable between the M and V groups (230 [41-420] vs. 268 [118-510], p = .65 and 2 [0-10] vs. 2 [0-13] spot-forming units/106 peripheral blood mononuclear cells, p = .60). In conclusion, compared with an additional dose of viral vector COVID-19 vaccine, a dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine did not elicit significantly different responses in KT recipients, regarding either humoral or cell-mediated immunity. (TCTR20211102003).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jackrapong Bruminhent
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital Mahidol University Bangkok Thailand,Ramathibodi Excellence Center for Organ Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital Mahidol University Bangkok Thailand
| | - Chavachol Setthaudom
- Immunology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital Mahidol University Bangkok Thailand
| | | | - Pongsathon Chaumdee
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital Mahidol University Bangkok Thailand
| | - Somsak Prasongtanakij
- Office of Research, Academic Affairs and Innovation, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital Mahidol University Bangkok Thailand
| | - Supanart Srisala
- Office of Research, Academic Affairs and Innovation, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital Mahidol University Bangkok Thailand
| | - Kumthorn Malathum
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital Mahidol University Bangkok Thailand
| | - Sarinya Boongird
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital Mahidol University Bangkok Thailand
| | - Arkom Nongnuch
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital Mahidol University Bangkok Thailand
| | - Montira Assanatham
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital Mahidol University Bangkok Thailand
| | - Laor Nakgul
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital Mahidol University Bangkok Thailand
| | - Nutaporn Sanmeema
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital Mahidol University Bangkok Thailand
| | - Angsana Phuphuakrat
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital Mahidol University Bangkok Thailand
| | - Sasisopin Kiertiburanakul
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital Mahidol University Bangkok Thailand,Sasisopin Kiertiburanakul, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, 270 Rama VI Road, Ratchathewi, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Immunogenicity After a Heterologous BNT262b2 Versus Homologous Booster in Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving 2 Doses of CoronaVac Vaccine: A Prospective Cohort Study. Transplantation 2022; 106:2076-2084. [PMID: 35939382 PMCID: PMC9521386 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Comparative studies of third heterologous doses following the CoronaVac vaccine against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in kidney transplant recipients are lacking. METHODS This prospective, single-center cohort study included kidney transplant recipients without previous COVID-19. Patients received a third heterologous (BNT162b2 mRNA) or homologous dose at least 4 wk after 2 doses of the CoronaVac vaccine. Immunoglobulin G antibody response and seroprevalence for neutralizing anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antibodies immediately before and 28 d after third doses were compared between the groups. RESULTS There were 307 patients in the heterologous group and 777 in the homologous group. Patients in the heterologous group were older (54 versus 50 y; P < 0.0001), with a longer time since transplant (11 versus 6 y; P < 0.0001). Immediately before the third dose, immunoglobulin G seroprevalence (36% versus 34%; P = 0.597) and antibody titers (246 versus 268 AU/mL; P = 0.279) were similar. After booster, seroconversion was higher in the heterologous group (49% versus 32%; P < 0.0001), resulting in a higher seroprevalence (67% versus 55%; P = 0.0003); however, 42% of all patients remained seronegative. Antibody titers after booster in seropositive patients were higher in the heterologous group (7771 versus 599 AU/mL; P < 0.0001). These results persisted after adjusting for confounding variables. Lastly, a similar proportion of patients became seropositive for neutralizing antibodies (98% versus 94%; P = 0.098). CONCLUSIONS In kidney transplant recipients fully vaccinated with CoronaVac, a third dose with an mRNA vaccine produced a higher seroconversion rate and antibody titers than a third homologous dose. However, both boosters achieved equivalent seroprevalence for neutralizing antibodies. The high proportion of still seronegative patients indicates the need for alternative strategies of protection.
Collapse
|
9
|
Prasithsirikul W, Nopsopon T, Phutrakool P, Suwanwattana P, Kantagowit P, Pongpirul W, Jongkaewwattana A, Pongpirul K. ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Immunogenicity and Immunological Response Following COVID-19 Infection in Patients Receiving Maintenance Hemodialysis. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10060959. [PMID: 35746567 PMCID: PMC9230560 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10060959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Revised: 06/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) receiving hemodialysis (HD) were found to have a decreased immune response following mRNA COVID-19 immunization. ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 was a promising COVID-19 vaccine that performed well in the general population, but the evidence on immunogenicity in ESRD with HD patients was limited. Moreover, the immunological response to COVID-19 infection was inconclusive in patients with ESRD and HD. The aim of this study was to investigate the immunogenicity of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination and the immunological response after COVID-19 infection in ESRD patients with HD. The blood samples were obtained at baseline, 1-month, and 3-month follow-up after each shot or recovery. All participants were measured for anti-spike IgG by the ELISA method, using Euroimmun. This study found a significant increase in anti-spike IgG after 1 month of two-shot ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination, followed by a significant decrease after 3 months. On the other hand, the anti-spike IgG was maintained in the post-recovery group. There was no significant difference in the change of anti-spike IgG between the one-shot ChAdOx1 nCoV-19-vaccinated and post-recovery groups for both 1-month and 3-month follow-ups. The seroconversion rate for the vaccinated group was 60.32% at 1 month after one-shot vaccination and slightly dropped to 58.73% at the 3-month follow-up, then was 92.06% at 1 month after two-shot vaccination and reduced to 82.26% at the 3-month follow-up. For the recovered group, the seroconversion rate was 95.65% at 1 month post-recovery and 92.50% at 3-month follow-up. This study demonstrated the immunogenicity of two-dose ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 in ESRD patients with HD for humoral immunity. After COVID-19 infection, the humoral immune response was strong and could be maintained for at least three months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wisit Prasithsirikul
- Bamrasnaradura Infectious Diseases Institute, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand; (W.P.); (P.S.); (W.P.)
| | - Tanawin Nopsopon
- Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand; (P.P.); (P.K.)
- School of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02215, USA
- Correspondence: (T.N.); (K.P.)
| | - Phanupong Phutrakool
- Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand; (P.P.); (P.K.)
- School of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Pawita Suwanwattana
- Bamrasnaradura Infectious Diseases Institute, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand; (W.P.); (P.S.); (W.P.)
| | - Piyawat Kantagowit
- Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand; (P.P.); (P.K.)
- School of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Wannarat Pongpirul
- Bamrasnaradura Infectious Diseases Institute, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand; (W.P.); (P.S.); (W.P.)
| | - Anan Jongkaewwattana
- National Center of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand;
| | - Krit Pongpirul
- Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand; (P.P.); (P.K.)
- School of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Bumrungrad International Hospital, Bangkok 10110, Thailand
- Correspondence: (T.N.); (K.P.)
| |
Collapse
|