Clustering analysis in outpatients with allergic rhinitis in clinical practice

Is intralymphatic immunotherapy effective and safe for allergic rhinitis?: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

As there is much controversy in using intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT) as a therapeutic means for allergic rhinitis (AR), its efficacy and safety for AR were investigated based on a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

Databases PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Web of Science were employed to retrieve relevant randomized control studies on ILIT for AR. The search deadline was September 15, 2023. Meta-analysis was performed on the data of the included literature using Stata 15.0.

RESULTS

Eleven randomized control studies were included involving a total of 406 patients. Meta-analysis results revealed that ILIT improved patients' quality of life [standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) = (-1.00, -0.050)], and reduced the adverse events of nasal symptoms [risk ratio (RR) = 0.16, 95% CI = (0.06, 0.45)] as compared to control, whereas no significant difference was discovered in symptom score [SMD = 0.14, 95% CI = (-0.34, 0.62)], IgE [SMD = 0.93, 95% CI = (-0.44, 2.30)], medication scores [SMD = 1.37, 95% CI = (-0.45, 3.18)], comprehensive symptom and medication scores [SMD = 0.93, 95% CI = (-0.62, 2.47)], nasal symptoms [RR = 0.16, 95% CI = (0.06, 0.45)], and lymphadenectasis [RR = 2.27, 95% CI = (0.37, 6.73)] versus control.

CONCLUSION

After the application of the ILIT strategy against AR, the quality of life of patients was improved and the incidence of adverse events associated with nasal symptoms was reduced, but the conclusion needed further verification with more high-quality research.

The Impact of Cytokines on Health-Related Quality of Life in Adolescents with Allergic Rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Frequent episodes of nasal symptoms are the usual clinical manifestations (CM) of allergic rhinitis (AR) and have a significant negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in adolescents. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to test the hypothesis that cytokines in nasal mucus may be associated with HRQoL in adolescents with AR.

METHODS

European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 3 Level Version (EQ-5D-3L), "The Adolescent Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire" (AdolRQLQ) and the Total 4 Symptom Score (T4SS) scoring system were administered to 113 adolescents with AR, nonallergic rhinitis (NAR) and to healthy control subjects. Nasal secretions were sampled and tested for 13 cytokines using a multiplex flow cytometric bead assay.

RESULTS

The AR group had significantly lower EQ-5D-3L (0.661 ± 0.267 vs. 0.943 ± 0.088; p < 0.001) and higher AdolRQLQ total scores (2.76 ± 1.01 vs. 1.02 ± 0.10; p < 0.001) compared to the control group. The AR group had higher concentrations of IL-1β (p = 0.002), IL-6 (p = 0.031), IL-8 (p < 0.001), IL17-A (p = 0.013) and IL-18 (p = 0.014) compared to the control group, and IL-1β, IL-6, IL17-A and IL-18 were significantly (p < 0.050) increased with disease progression. Cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, as well as severe CM, were identified as significant predictors of lower HRQoL in adolescents with AR.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified IL-1β, IL-6, as well as severe CM, as predictors of lower HRQoL in adolescents with AR. However, these results should only serve as a starting point for additional confirmation research.

Association between allergic rhinitis and hypertension risk: A bidirectional 2-sample mendelian randomization study

Previous studies have suggested a potential association between allergic rhinitis (AR) and hypertension, but the genetic basis remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to explore the genetic correlation and potential causal association between AR and hypertension. Using a large-scale genome-wide association study (GWAS) public database, we conducted meticulous screening to acquire the most up-to-date GWAS data on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) relevant to AR and hypertension, with a significance threshold of P < 5 × 10-8. Then, we investigated the causal association between AR and hypertension through mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. We also performed reverse MR analysis to assess the possibility of reverse causality. Sensitivity analyses encompassed various factors, including horizontal pleiotropy, heterogeneity testing, and stepwise exclusion sensitivity checks. To investigate the causal relationship between AR and hypertension, we utilize the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) as our evaluative metric. This study leveraged a database comprising 112583 samples for AR and 461880 samples for hypertension. After meticulous screening, we identified 32 SNPs as instrumental variables. By employing the aforementioned 2-sample Mendelian randomization approaches, the estimated causal effects showed striking concordance. A discernible causal association between AR and hypertension was found using the IVW method (OR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.86-0.98, P = .008), with horizontal pleiotropy and heterogeneity tests supporting the validity of our MR study. MR-Egger regression findings provided reassurance against bias stemming from genetic pleiotropy (intercept = -0.0006802, P = .6947). Interestingly, "leave-one-out" analysis yielded no evidence of nonspecific SNP influences, further consolidating our findings. Moreover, our reverse MR analysis yielded no indication of reverse causality from hypertension to AR, effectively discounting any influence from the latter on the former. Our study found evidence of a causal association between AR and hypertension in individuals of European ancestry. It demonstrated that AR reduced the risk of hypertension, suggesting a protective effect on hypertension due to the negative correlation with AR.

International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Allergic rhinitis - 2023

BACKGROUND

In the 5 years that have passed since the publication of the 2018 International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2018), the literature has expanded substantially. The ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 update presents 144 individual topics on allergic rhinitis (AR), expanded by over 40 topics from the 2018 document. Originally presented topics from 2018 have also been reviewed and updated. The executive summary highlights key evidence-based findings and recommendation from the full document.

METHODS

ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 employed established evidence-based review with recommendation (EBRR) methodology to individually evaluate each topic. Stepwise iterative peer review and consensus was performed for each topic. The final document was then collated and includes the results of this work.

RESULTS

ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 includes 10 major content areas and 144 individual topics related to AR. For a substantial proportion of topics included, an aggregate grade of evidence is presented, which is determined by collating the levels of evidence for each available study identified in the literature. For topics in which a diagnostic or therapeutic intervention is considered, a recommendation summary is presented, which considers the aggregate grade of evidence, benefit, harm, and cost.

CONCLUSION

The ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 update provides a comprehensive evaluation of AR and the currently available evidence. It is this evidence that contributes to our current knowledge base and recommendations for patient evaluation and treatment.

A Synopsis of Guidance for Allergic Rhinitis Diagnosis and Management From ICAR 2023

An updated edition of the International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (ICAR:AR) has recently been published. This consensus document, which included the participation of 87 primary authors and 40 additional consultant authors, who critically appraised evidence on 144 individual topics concerning allergic rhinitis, provides guidance for health care providers using the evidence-based review with recommendations (EBRR) methodology. This synopsis highlights topical areas including pathophysiology, epidemiology, disease burden, risk and protective factors, evaluation and diagnosis, aeroallergen avoidance and environmental controls, single and combination pharmacotherapy options, allergen immunotherapy (subcutaneous, sublingual, rush, cluster), pediatric considerations, alternative and emerging therapies, and unmet needs. Based on the EBRR methodology, ICAR:AR includes strong recommendations for the treatment of allergic rhinitis: (1) for the use of newer generation antihistamines compared with first-generation alternatives, intranasal corticosteroid, intranasal saline, combination therapy with intranasal corticosteroid plus intranasal antihistamine for patients not responding to monotherapy, and subcutaneous immunotherapy and sublingual tablet immunotherapy in properly selected patients; (2) against the use of oral decongestant monotherapy and routine use of oral corticosteroids.

Epipharyngeal Abrasive Therapy (EAT) Reduces the mRNA Expression of Major Proinflammatory Cytokine IL-6 in Chronic Epipharyngitis

The epipharynx, located behind the nasal cavity, is responsible for upper respiratory tract immunity; however, it is also the site of frequent acute and chronic inflammation. Previous reports have suggested that chronic epipharyngitis is involved not only in local symptoms such as cough and postnasal drip, but also in systemic inflammatory diseases such as IgA nephropathy and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and Long COVID. Epipharyngeal Abrasive Therapy (EAT), which is an effective treatment for chronic epipharyngitis in Japan, is reported to be effective for these intractable diseases. The sedation of chronic epipharyngitis by EAT induces suppression of the inflammatory cytokines and improves systemic symptoms, which is considered to be one of the mechanisms, but there is no report that has proved this hypothesis. The purpose of this study was to clarify the anti-inflammatory effect of EAT histologically. The study subjects were 8 patients who were not treated with EAT and 11 patients who were treated with EAT for chronic epipharyngitis for 1 month or more. For immunohistochemical assessment, the expression pattern of IL-6 mRNA, which plays a central role in the human cytokine network, was analyzed using in situ hybridization. The expression of IL-6 in the EAT-treated group was significantly lower than those in the EAT nontreated group (p = 0.0015). In addition, EAT suppressed the expression of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), a crucial proinflammatory cytokine. As a result, continuous EAT suppressed submucosal cell aggregation and reduced inflammatory cytokines. Thus, EAT may contribute to the improvement of systemic inflammatory diseases through the suppression of IL-6 expression.

Rhinology in review: from COVID-19 to biologicals

We look back at the end of what soon will be seen as an historic year, from COVID-19 to real-world introduction of biologicals influencing the life of our patients. This review describes the important findings in Rhinology over the past year. A large body of evidence now demonstrates loss of sense of smell to be one of the most common symptoms of COVID-19 infection; a meta-analysis of 3563 patients found the mean prevalence of self-reported loss to be 47%. A number of studies have now shown long-term reduced loss of smell and parosmia. Given the high numbers of people affected by COVID-19, even with the best reported recovery rates, a significant number worldwide will be left with severe olfactory dysfunction. The most prevalent causes for olfactory dysfunction, besides COVID-19 and upper respiratory tract infections in general, are trauma and CRSwNP. For these CRSwNP patients a bright future seems to be starting with the development of treatment with biologics. This year the Nobel prize in Medicine 2021 was awarded jointly to David Julius and Ardem Patapoutian for their discoveries of receptors for temperature and touch which has greatly enhanced our understanding of nasal hyperreactivity and understanding of intranasal trigeminal function. Finally, a new definition of chronic rhinitis has been proposed in the last year and we have seen many papers emphasizing the importance of endotyping patients in chronic rhinitis and rhinosinusitis in order to optimise treatment effect.

Advances and highlights in allergic rhinitis

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a growing public health, medical and economic problem worldwide. The current review describes the major discoveries related to AR during the past 2 years, including risk factors for the prevalence of AR, the corresponding diagnostic strategy, precise underlying immunological mechanisms, and efficient therapies for AR during the ongoing global "coronavirus disease 2019" (COVID-19) pandemic. The review further attempts to highlight future research perspectives. Increasing evidence suggests that environmental exposures, climate changes, and lifestyle are important risk factors for AR. Consequently, detailed investigation of the exposome and the connection between environmental exposures and health in the future should provide better risk profiles instead of single predictors, and also help mitigate adverse health outcomes in allergic diseases. Although patients with dual AR, a newly defined AR phenotype, display perennial and seasonal allergens-related nasal symptoms, they are only allergic to seasonal allergens, indicating the importance of measuring inflammation at the local sites. Herein, we suggest that a combination of precise diagnosis in local sites and traditional diagnostic methods may enhance the precision medicine-based approach for management of AR; however, this awaits further investigations. Apart from traditional treatments, social distancing, washing hands, and disinfection are also required to better manage AR patients in the ongoing global COVID-19 pandemic. Despite recent advances in understanding the immune mechanisms underlying the effects of allergen immunotherapy (AIT), further understanding changes of cell profiles after AIT and accurately evaluate the efficacy of AIT are required.

Advances and novel developments in allergic rhinitis

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is an upper airway disease with high prevalence in the world, and therefore needs to be thoroughly investigated and treated accordingly. Although the mechanisms underlying the pathology and treatment of AR have been widely studied, many aspects of AR are still unclear and warrant further investigations. The purpose of the present review was therefore to report recently published papers, which highlight the novel mechanisms and treatments of AR. These include role of environment, important proteins and cells, and some other factors in the pathogenesis of AR; as well as the role of immunotherapy and biologics in the treatment of AR.

Small airways in children with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: the potential role of a multicomponent nutraceutical

Allergic rhinitis and asthma are closely linked. A progression from rhinitis to overt asthma is common. FEF25-75 is a spirometry parameter that could reflect small airways patency and could reliably predict early bronchial involvement in allergic rhinitis patients. MEF50 very strongly correlates with FEF25-75. The aim of this study was to evaluate possible spirometry change in two groups of children suffering from AR over time. The first group took a course of a nutraceutical (Lertal®) before the observation (active group, AG); a second one was considered as control (control group, CG). The children were visited at baseline, at the end of the nutraceutical course, and after 1 year. FEV1, FVC, and MEF50 were the primary outcomes. After one year, children in AG had significantly higher MEF50 than CG children (p=0.009). In conclusion, the present study showed that a course with a multicomponent nutraceutical could prevent the MEF50 decline in children with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.

The pragmatic role of FEF25-75 in asymptomatic subjects, allergic rhinitis, asthma, and in military setting

Introduction: The forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of forced vital capacity (FEF25-75) is a spirometry parameter that may be useful in many clinical settings. Values <65% of predicted have been defined as abnormal.Areas covered: The current report discusses the clinical value of FEF25-75 in different settingv, namely military medicine, primary care, and specialized clinic. Moreover, the predictive role of FEF25-75 was discussed considering different patients' populations, including patients suffering from allergic rhinitis and/or asthma, as well as normal subjects. The most recent literature concerning the assessment of FEF25-75 in these covered areas was searched.Expert opinion: In clinical practice, impaired values have been defined as a reliable surrogate marker for bronchial airflow limitation associated with early onset of asthma, bronchial hyperresponsiveness, lower airway inflammation, reversibility to bronchodilation testing, allergic sensitization, and uncontrolled asthma. In the military medicine setting, simple spirometry, including FEF25-75, may suggest a series of fruitful information.