Exercise-induced allergic reactions on desensitization to wheat after rush oral immunotherapy

Evaluation of peripheral basophil activation during exercise provocation test for desensitized patients

Some food allergic patients who have undergone oral immunotherapy develop exercise-induced allergic reactions on desensitization (EIARDs). This study investigated basophil activation status during the exercise provocation test (EPT) performed to diagnose EIARD. EPT was performed on 20 participants, and in vivo basophil activation status was analyzed using activation markers CD203c and CD63. The results showed that there was no significant difference between EPT-positive and negative subjects for basophil activation status throughout EPT. Consequently, in vivo basophil activation after ingestion of the causative food may not be associated with EIARDs. New tests are desired for predicting EIARDs.

Exercise-Induced Allergic Reactions in Children Desensitized to Hen's Eggs and Cow's Milk by Oral Immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Exercise-induced allergic reactions on desensitization (EIARDs) after successful in-hospital rush oral immunotherapy (OIT) for wheat allergy have been reported. However, the incidence rates of EIARDs after rush OIT for egg allergy and milk allergy have not been determined.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency of EIARDs and risk factors associated with rush OIT for egg and milk allergy.

METHODS

This retrospective chart review, conducted in January 2020, enrolled 64 and 43 patients who underwent rush OIT for egg and milk allergy, respectively (in 2010 to 2014). In particular, 48 and 32 desensitized patients underwent exercise-provocation tests (Ex-P) after allergen administration (4,400 mg boiled egg white and 6,600 mg cow's milk protein, respectively). The EIARDs were determined by Ex-P or a suspicious event even after passing the Ex-P. Specific IgE levels to egg white, cow's milk, ovomucoid, casein, α-lactalbumin, and β-lactoglobulin were analyzed using ImmunoCAP.

RESULTS

At least one episode of EIARD was observed in 10 and 17 patients with egg and milk allergy (21% and 53%), respectively, which persisted for more than 5 years in one patient with egg allergy (2.1%) and 11 patients with milk allergy (34.4%) as of January 2020. We could not find background differences between the EIARD-positive and EIARD-negative groups, except that the egg white-specific IgE/total IgE ratio before rush OIT was significantly higher in patients with egg allergy with EIARD than in those without it.

CONCLUSIONS

Exercise-induced allergic reactions on desensitization were more frequent and common in patients with milk allergy. Moreover, EIARDs to milk allergy were more likely to persist than those to egg allergy.

Cross-reactive epitopes and their role in food allergy

Allergenic cross-reactivity among food allergens complicates the diagnosis and management of food allergy. This can result in many patients being sensitized (having allergen-specific IgE) to foods without exhibiting clinical reactivity. Some food groups such as shellfish, fish, tree nuts, and peanuts have very high rates of cross-reactivity. In contrast, relatively low rates are noted for grains and milk, whereas many other food families have variable rates of cross-reactivity or are not well studied. Although classical cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants are clinically not relevant, α-Gal in red meat through tick bites can lead to severe reactions. Multiple sensitizations to tree nuts complicate the diagnosis and management of patients allergic to peanut and tree nut. This review discusses cross-reactive allergens and cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants in the major food groups, and where available, describes their B-cell and T-cell epitopes. The clinical relevance of these cross-reactive B-cell and T-cell epitopes is highlighted and their possible impact on allergen-specific immunotherapy for food allergy is discussed.

Risk factors for severe reactions in food allergy: Rapid evidence review with meta-analysis

This rapid review summarizes the most up to date evidence about the risk factors for severe food-induced allergic reactions. We searched three bibliographic databases for studies published between January 2010 and August 2021. We included 88 studies and synthesized the evidence narratively, undertaking meta-analysis where appropriate. Significant uncertainties remain with respect to the prediction of severe reactions, both anaphylaxis and/or severe anaphylaxis refractory to treatment. Prior anaphylaxis, an asthma diagnosis, IgE sensitization or basophil activation tests are not good predictors. Some molecular allergology markers may be helpful. Hospital presentations for anaphylaxis are highest in young children, yet this age group appears at lower risk of severe outcomes. Risk of severe outcomes is greatest in adolescence and young adulthood, but the contribution of risk taking behaviour in contributing to severe outcomes is unclear. Evidence for an impact of cofactors on severity is lacking, although food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis may be an exception. Some medications such as beta-blockers or ACE inhibitors may increase severity, but appear less important than age as a factor in life-threatening reactions. The relationship between dose of exposure and severity is unclear. Delays in symptom recognition and anaphylaxis treatment have been associated with more severe outcomes. An absence of prior anaphylaxis does not exclude its future risk.

Hypoallergenic Wheat Line (1BS-18H) Lacking ω5-Gliadin Induces Oral Tolerance to Wheat Gluten Proteins in a Rat Model of Wheat Allergy

The early ingestion of food can prevent the onset of food allergy related to inducing oral tolerance (OT). We developed the Hokushin wheat line as a hypoallergenic wheat (1BS-18H) lacking ω5-gliadin, a major allergen of wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (WDEIA). The 1BS-18H wheat had lower ability of sensitization for ω5-gliadin compared with Hokushin wheat. Here, we evaluated the induction of OT to gluten and ω5-gliadin by the early consecutive ingestion of 1BS-18H gluten using a rat model of wheat allergy. Rats were subcutaneously immunized with commercial gluten or native ω5-gliadin following the daily oral administration of gluten. The daily oral administration of 1BS-18H gluten for 5 days before immunization suppressed the increase in gluten- or ω5-gliadin-specific IgE and IgG₁ antibodies induced by immunization to a level similar to Hokushin gluten. Intravenous challenge with gluten or ω5-gliadin did not decrease the rectal temperature in rats with OT induced by 1BS-18H or Hokushin gluten, although it was decreased in non-OT rats. In conclusion, the early consecutive ingestion of 1BS-18H wheat before sensitization induced OT to gluten and ω5-gliadin. These findings support the benefit of 1BS-18H wheat to prevent wheat allergy including WDEIA by consecutive ingestion in humans.

The clinical cross-reactivity and immunological cross-antigenicity of wheat and barley

BACKGROUND

Some patients with wheat allergy have been reported to show clinical cross-reactivity to barley. However, it is not clear whether the development of barley allergy in patients with wheat allergy is due to cross-antigenicity between wheat and barley. This study aimed to determine the clinical cross-reactivity and immunological cross-antigenicity of wheat and barley.

METHODS

The results of barley oral food challenges (OFCs) were compared before and after oral immunotherapy (OIT) for wheat in nine patients with wheat allergy to estimate the clinical cross-reactivity of wheat and barley. Moreover, we performed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) inhibition and immunoblotting inhibition using serum from seven patients allergic to wheat and barley.

RESULTS

Nine patients who had positive barley-OFC results performed before OIT for wheat were all negative on barley-OFC performed after OIT. In ELISA inhibition, preincubation of serum from patients allergic to wheat and barley with a high barley extract concentration inhibited binding of IgE to wheat extract by less than 10%. On the other hand, wheat and barley extracts equally inhibited binding to barley sIgE at high concentrations. In the immunoblotting inhibition test, the spots of wheat were inhibited but weakly by barley extracts, and most of the spots of barley were inhibited even by low concentrations of the wheat and barley extract.

CONCLUSIONS

We showed that barley allergy associated with wheat allergy is caused by cross-reactivity from wheat. The OIT for wheat is one of the promising options for barley allergy.

Performance evaluation of a laboratory-developed light-initiated chemiluminescence assay for quantification of egg white-specific IgE

Background

Specific IgE (sIgE) testing has become one of the most important tools for diagnosing IgE‐mediated food allergy. Enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and dot‐enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (Dot‐ELISA) have been used to measure sIgE in clinical widely. Light‐initiated chemiluminescence assay (LICA) is a new method for measuring allergen‐sIgE. We aimed to establish a LICA method for quantitative detection of egg white‐sIgE and evaluate its performances.

Methods

The best chemibeads coupling method in detecting egg white‐sIgE was selected, and a LICA method for quantitative detection of egg white‐sIgE was established. The precision study was performed according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) EP5‐A2. Detection capability which contains limit of blank (LoB), limit of detection (LoD), and limit of quantitation (LoQ) was evaluated according to National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China (NHC) WS/T 514–2017. Linear range was evaluated according to CLSI EP6‐A. All data were analyzed using SPSS software.

Results

Precision contains repeatability and intermediate precision. The CV of repeatability ranged from 2.72% to 7.29%, and the CV of intermediate precision ranged from 4.93% to 8.64%. The LoB, LoD, and LoQ of the assay were 0.000 kUA/L, 0.053 kUA/L, and 0.076 kUA/L. The assay linear range was 0.076–34.125 kU_A/L (r = 0.9979 ≥ 0.9900).

Conclusion

This laboratory‐developed LICA method can detect egg white‐sIgE, and performance meets clinical requirements. This method shows rapid turnaround cycles and high sensitivity. It can be used as an alternative method for clinical detection of egg white‐sIgE.

Oral immunotherapy for food allergy in children: is it worth it?

INTRODUCTION

Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is effective at inducing desensitization in food-allergic individuals, and is a valid therapeutic option for those allergic to peanut, cow's milk and egg. However, there is a high rate of dose-related adverse events, and at least one fatality to OIT has been reported.

AREAS COVERED

We provide an update on the broader framework of issues which will impact on the availability and uptake of OIT.

EXPERT OPINION

The need for standardized products remains controversial. A licensed product exists for peanut-OIT, but OIT can also be safely achieved using peanut-containing foods at much lower cost. For other allergens, OIT can only be done with non-pharma products - something which has been done safely for over 2 decades. There is a need to develop personalized protocols for OIT, particularly for the 20% of patients unable to tolerate standard OIT. Cost-effectiveness is dependent on improved quality of life, but evidence for this is currently lacking, and is a key evidence gap. OIT is likely to be cost-effective, particularly if noncommercial products are used. There may be a trade-off: in patients with lower reaction thresholds, a commercial product may be needed for initial updosing, until a level of desensitization is achieved when they can be switched to natural food products.

Oral Immunotherapy in Food Allergy: A Critical Pediatric Perspective

There is evidence that in children with persistent IgE-mediated food allergy (FA) to cow's milk, hen's egg, and peanut, oral allergen-specific immunotherapy (OIT) may increase the reaction threshold to the culprit food allergen(s). OIT may protect patients from the occurrence of severe reactions in case of accidental ingestion of the culprit food during treatment. Notwithstanding, many gaps are still unsolved, including safety issues, identification of predictive biomarkers, and post-desensitization efficacy. In this perspective, the use of omalizumab (Anti-IgE monoclonal antibody) has been proposed as an adjunctive treatment to OIT in order to reduce the risk of allergic reactions related to OIT. This review aims to summarize the current evidence and unmet needs on OIT in children with FA to enhance the development of longitudinal, prospective, and well-designed studies able to fill the current gaps soon.

A light-initiated chemiluminescent assay for the detection of children's milk protein-specific IgE with excellent ability to avoid interference of specific IgG

The detection of allergen-specific IgE is of value for the diagnosis of children's milk allergy. However, its accuracy will interfere with the presence of high levels of specific IgG in the serum of children with milk allergy. To solve this problem, we established a light-initiated chemiluminescent assay (LICA) based on nanomicrospheres, which neutralized the interference of specific IgG by increasing the amount of antigen coated on the microspheres. The ability of this method to resist IgG interference was confirmed by adding extra specific IgG to the serum of allergic patients. Finally, the positive rate of allergen-specific IgE was increased to 85%, which was better than the indirect ELISA (70%), indicating that this method has certain advantages for the detection of specific IgE in children with milk allergy.

Exercise-induced allergic reactions after achievement of desensitization to cow's milk and wheat

BACKGROUND

We have previously reported that more than half of the patients who achieved desensitization after wheat rush oral immunotherapy (OIT) developed exercise-induced allergic reaction on desensitization (EIARD). However, data on EIARDs after slow OIT are lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the results of exercise provocation tests (EPTs) in patients after slow OIT for cow's milk and wheat allergies.

METHODS

This was a retrospective chart review of 87 EPTs in 74 patients. The EPTs were performed in patients who were desensitized to at least 6,600 mg cow's milk protein or 5,200 mg wheat protein with slow OIT and were identified to be at a high risk of EIARDs. EPTs were performed after ingestion of the maximum desensitization dose. The patients' clinical characteristics and symptoms were analyzed.

RESULTS

The EPT results were positive for cow's milk in 49% (21/43) of the patients and for wheat in 48% (15/31) of the patients. There was no significant difference in the clinical characteristics between the EIARD-positive and EIARD-negative groups. The specific IgE (sIgE) levels before OIT and the reduction rates of sIgE before and after OIT did not correlate with the outcomes of the EPTs. Among the EIARD-positive patients, 13 patients (cow's milk, n = 7; wheat, n = 6) underwent a second EPT, and the EIARD disappeared in 8 patients (cow's milk, n = 4; wheat, n = 4).

CONCLUSION

EIARDs were observed after slow OIT for cow's milk and wheat. Further research into the predictive factors of EIARDs in these patients is needed to understand its clinical manifestations.

Wheat oral immunotherapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The prevalence of food allergy is increasing on a global scale, and therefore increased attention is being paid to specific food allergy epidemiology and management. There has been a large amount of progress made in the last decade on human trials of wheat oral immunotherapy (WOIT).

RECENT FINDINGS

To date, there has been one multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial of WOIT, one randomized, noncontrolled trial of WOIT, and several smaller, nonrandomized clinical trials of WOIT. WOIT trials are generally limited by smaller sample sizes, affecting the demographic skew of evaluated patients. In addition, there is minimal standardization of efficacy and safety outcomes between trial protocols, making head-to-head comparison challenging. However, some common themes emerge. The majority of WOIT regimens result in successful desensitization, and success is more likely with higher maintenance dosing for longer periods of time. Limited studies have looked at sustained unresponsiveness in WOIT. WOIT can induce allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, but more severe reactions often have an associated augmenting factor, such as exercise. Lower maintenance doses likely are associated with less severe reactions, and food modification and/or adjunct therapeutics may also decrease the risk of reactions.

SUMMARY

WOIT trials are ongoing and will optimize updosing protocols and maintenance doses to improve efficacy and safety.

Novel insights regarding anaphylaxis in children - With a focus on prevalence, diagnosis, and treatment

Anaphylaxis is a serious allergic reaction that occurs rapidly and causes a life-threatening response involving the whole body. This reaction often leads to difficulty in breathing and can result in death. The estimated prevalence of anaphylaxis is 0.05%-2%, which is reported to be increasing in children. Although drugs and venom are the most common causes of anaphylaxis in adults, food is the most common cause of anaphylaxis in children. An interesting association between food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (FDEIA) and oral immunotherapy (OIT) has recently been reported. A provocation test to determine the diagnostic and augmenting factors of FDEIA has been reported in recent years. Remarkably, several articles showed allergic symptoms without exercise in children with FDEIA and in those with FDEIA development after OIT. Regarding OIT, full-dose OIT poses a risk of adverse reactions, including anaphylaxis. Recent trials have shown the efficacy and safety of low-dose OIT in patients with food-induced anaphylaxis. In this review, we summarized the novel insights regarding anaphylaxis in the pediatric population.