Anaesthetists and aerospace medicine in a new era of human spaceflight

Potential for using simulated altitude as a means of prehabilitation: a physiology study

The current pandemic of surgical complications necessitates urgent and pragmatic innovation to reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality, which are associated with poor pre-operative fitness and anaemia. Exercise prehabilitation is a compelling strategy, but it has proven difficult to establish that it improves outcomes either in isolation or as part of a multimodal approach. Simulated altitude exposure improves performance in athletes and offers a novel potential means of improving cardiorespiratory and metabolic fitness and alleviating anaemia within the prehabilitation window. We aimed to provide an initial physiological foundation for 'altitude prehabilitation' by determining the physiological effects of one week of simulated altitude (FI O2 15%, equivalent to approximately 2438 m (8000 ft)) in older sedentary volunteers. The study used a randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled crossover design. Eight participants spent counterbalanced normoxic and hypoxic weeks in a residential hypoxia facility and underwent repeated cardiopulmonary exercise tests. Mean (SD) age of participants was 64 (7) y and they were unfit, with mean (SD) baseline anaerobic threshold 12 (2) ml.kg-1 .min-1 and mean (SD) peak V̇O2 15 (3) ml.kg-1 .min-1 . Hypoxia was mild (mean (SD) Sp O2 93 (2) %, p < 0.001) and well-tolerated. Despite some indication of greater peak exercise capacity following hypoxia, overall there was no effect of simulated altitude on anaerobic threshold or peak V̇O2 . However, hypoxia induced a substantial increase in mean (SD) haemoglobin of 1.5 (2.7) g.dl-1 (13% increase, p = 0.028). This study has established the concept and feasibility of 'altitude prehabilitation' and demonstrated specific potential for improving haematological fitness. Physiologically, there is value in exploring a possible role for simulated altitude in pre-operative optimisation.

Evaluation of free-floating tracheal intubation in weightlessness via ice-pick position with a direct laryngoscopy and classic approach with indirect videolaryngoscopy

Long duration spaceflights to the Moon or Mars are at risk for emergency medical events. Managing a hypoxemic distress and performing an advanced airway procedure such as oro-tracheal intubation may be complicated under weightlessness due to ergonomic constraints. An emergency free-floating intubation would be dangerous because of high failure rates due to stabilization issues that prohibits its implementation in a space environment. Nevertheless, we hypothesized that two configurations could lead to a high first-pass success score for intubation performed by a free-floating operator. In a non-randomized, controlled, cross-over simulation study during a parabolic flight campaign, we evaluated and compared the intubation performance of free-floating trained operators, using either a conventional direct laryngoscope in an ice-pick position or an indirect laryngoscopy with a video-laryngoscope in a classic position at the head of a high-fidelity simulation manikin, in weightlessness and in normogravity. Neither of the two tested conditions reached the minimal terrestrial ILCOR recommendations (95% first-pass success) and therefore could not be recommended for general implementation under weightlessness conditions. Free-floating video laryngoscopy at the head of the manikin had a significant better success score than conventional direct laryngoscopy in an ice-pick position. Our results, combined with the preexisting literature, emphasis the difficulties of performing oro-tracheal intubation, even for experts using modern airway devices, under postural instability in weightlessness. ClinicalTrials registration number NCT05303948.

Physiological Effects of Centrifuge-Simulated Suborbital Spaceflight

BACKGROUND: High-G acceleration experienced during launch and re-entry of suborbital spaceflights may present challenges for older or medically susceptible participants. A detailed understanding of the associated physiological responses would support the development of an evidence-based medical approach to commercial suborbital spaceflight.METHODS: There were 24 healthy subjects recruited into 'younger' (18-44 yr), 'intermediate' (45-64 yr) and 'older' (65-80 yr) age groups. Cardiovascular and respiratory variables were measured continuously during dynamic combinations of +G_x (chest-to-back) and +G_z (head-to-foot) acceleration that simulated suborbital G profiles for spaceplane and rocket/capsule platforms. Measurements were conducted breathing air and breathing 15% oxygen to simulate a cabin pressure altitude of 8000 ft.RESULTS: Suborbital G profiles generated highly dynamic changes in heart rate, blood pressure, and cardiac output. G-induced hypoxemia was observed, with minimum arterial oxygen saturation < 80% in a quarter of subjects. Increased age was associated with greater hypoxemia and reduced cardiac output responses but did not have detrimental cardiovascular effects. ECG changes included recurrent G-induced trigeminy in one individual. Respiratory and visual symptoms were common, with 88% of subjects reporting greyout and 29% reporting blackout. There was one episode of G-induced loss of consciousness (G-LOC).DISCUSSION: Suborbital acceleration profiles are generally well tolerated but are not physiologically inconsequential. Marked hemodynamic effects and transient respiratory compromise could interact with predisposing factors to precipitate adverse cardiopulmonary effects in a minority of participants. Medically susceptible individuals may benefit from expanded preflight centrifuge familiarization that includes targeted physiological evaluation in the form of a 'G challenge test'.Smith TG, Pollock RD, Britton JK, Green NDC, Hodkinson PD, Mitchell SJ, Stevenson AT. Physiological effects of centrifuge-simulated suborbital spaceflight. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2022; 93(12):830-839.

Oh G: The x, y and z of human physiological responses to acceleration

NEW FINDINGS

What is the topic of this review? This review focuses on the main physiological challenges associated with exposure to acceleration in the Gx, Gy and Gz directions and to microgravity. What advances does it highlight? Our current understanding of the physiology of these environments and latest strategies to protect against them are discussed in light of the limited knowledge we have in some of these areas.

ABSTRACT

The desire to go higher, faster and further has taken us to environments where the accelerations placed on our bodies far exceed or are much lower than that attributable to Earth's gravity. While on the ground, racing drivers of the fastest cars are exposed to high degrees of lateral acceleration (Gy) during cornering. In the air, while within the confines of the lower reaches of Earth's atmosphere, fast jet pilots are routinely exposed to high levels of acceleration in the head-foot direction (Gz). During launch and re-entry of suborbital and orbital spacecraft, astronauts and spaceflight participants are exposed to high levels of chest-back acceleration (Gx), whereas once in space the effects of gravity are all but removed (termed microgravity, μG). Each of these environments has profound effects on the homeostatic mechanisms within the body and can have a serious impact, not only for those with underlying pathology but also for healthy individuals. This review provides an overview of the main challenges associated with these environments and our current understanding of the physiological and pathophysiological adaptations to them. Where relevant, protection strategies are discussed, with the implications of our future exposure to these environments also being considered.