Comparison of the efficacy of low-intensity shock wave therapy and its combination with platelet-rich plasma in patients with erectile dysfunction

The efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) alone or in combination with low intensity shock wave therapy (Li-SWT) in treating erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of seven randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The goal of this meta-analysis intended to identify the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) alone or in combination with low intensity shock wave therapy (Li-SWT) as a therapy for erectile dysfunction (ED).

METHODS

This study integrated and analyzed the data using Cochrane method and GRADEpro GDT grading system. The registration number for this study was CRD42024618240.

RESULT

Seven randomized controlled trials with 660 patients were analyzed. The results indicated that compared with the control group, IIEF score of patients in the PRP group improved significantly at 12-week (p = 0.03) and 24-week (p = 0.0004), while there was no significant difference at 4-week. The PRP group had no significant advantages over the control group in terms of MCID and SEP Q3. For peak systolic velocity, patients in the PRP group demonstrated greater improvement than those in the control group (p < 0.00001). Subgroup analysis revealed that adding PRP regimen can considerably improve IIEF scores of ED patients compared to using Li-SWT alone (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

PRP demonstrated a better efficacy in treating ED, especially during a follow-up period of 6 months. Compared with using Li-SWT alone, the addition of PRP can considerably improve the IIEF score of ED patients. These findings still required large-scale clinical trials for verification.

Efficacy of extracorporeal shock waves therapy for erectile dysfunction treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Erectile dysfunction is becoming a public health problem, affecting 22% of men over 40 years of age, where one of the first lines of treatment for this pathology is the use of drugs, so it is necessary to know the effectiveness of new non-invasive alternative therapies that limit the consumption of these substances in the general population. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of extracorporeal shock waves therapy for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. To achieve this, a systematic review was carried out through the databases PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Cinhal, Medline, and Web of Science; using the search terms, Erectile Dysfunction, Physical Therapy Modalities, Physical Therapy Specialty, Rehabilitation and Shock Wave Therapy.

RESULTS

The search ended with a total of 15 articles, differentiating between two study groups, those patients suffering from organic erectile dysfunction (n = 12) and those suffering from the same pathology after undergoing radical prostatectomy with nerve sparing (n = 3). The combined analysis showed that the group treated with extracorporeal shock waves therapy had a significant increase in erectile function compared to the controls. The Difference in Means was 2.96 points (95% CI: 1.93 to 4.61; p < 0.001; I2 = 63.45).

CONCLUSIONS

Extracorporeal shock waves therapy appears to have a positive effect in the treatment of erectile dysfunction, with these changes being reflected in different variables such as erectile function, erectile efficacy or sexual satisfaction. Its efficacy seems to increase with interventions that include two weekly sessions and with the application at least 6000 pulses in each session.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO Registration code: CRD42021230001.

Clinical Effects and Safety Outcomes of Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy in Patients with Vasculogenic Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Erectile dysfunction (ED) significantly impacts quality of life and intimate relationships. ED results from a complex interaction of physiological, psychological, and lifestyle factors. While conventional treatments focus on symptom management, regenerative therapies like platelet-rich plasma (PRP) aim to address underlying causes, offering curative potential. However, evidence for PRP's efficacy in vasculogenic ED remains inconclusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) evaluates the effectiveness of penile PRP injections for vasculogenic ED and updates clinical guidelines based on recent evidence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Conducted per MOOSE guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023430295), this SRMA included observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing PRP for vasculogenic ED. The PECOS framework guided eligibility, focusing on RCTs comparing PRP to placebo for meta-analysis. Data on study characteristics, PRP protocols, and outcomes using validated erectile function measures and penile Doppler parameters were extracted. Quality was assessed using Cochrane risk of bias and CONSORT guidelines. Statistical analysis employed random or fixed-effects models based on heterogeneity, with publication bias evaluated via funnel plots.

RESULTS

Of 111 abstracts screened, 28 met inclusion criteria, and 3 RCTs alongside 2 observational comparative studies were reviewed. Meta-analysis of the RCTs showed significant improvement in erectile function for PRP versus placebo (mean difference 3.28, 95% confidence interval 1.46-5.11, p<0.001). Sensitivity analysis confirmed result's robustness, and no publication bias was detected. Side effects were rare, with isolated cases of plaque formation and hematoma. Studies combining PRP with low-intensity shock wave therapy showed enhanced efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

PRP therapy appears promising for vasculogenic ED, but additional research is necessary to establish definitive clinical guidelines.

Platelet-rich plasma: A bibliometric and visual analysis from 2000 to 2022

BACKGROUND

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is an integral biotherapeutic modality with evolving significance in the medical domain. Despite its expanding applications, a comprehensive bibliometric evaluation is essential to understand its development and impact.

METHODS

The Web of Science core collection subject search identified articles pertinent to PRP applications. Analytical tools, including CiteSpace, VOSviewer, Bibliometrix (R-Tool for R-Studio), TBtools, SCImago Graphica, Origin, and Excel, facilitated the bibliometric scrutiny. This examination spanned dimensions ranging from geographical and institutional contributions to thematic shifts and keyword prevalence.

RESULTS

A corpus of 5167 publications was analyzed, with the United States, particularly the Hospital for Special Surgery, emerging as major contributors. The American Journal of Sports Medicine was identified as the primary journal, and Anitua Eduardo as the leading author in the domain. Keyword analysis highlighted evolving research themes, with a shift from traditional applications in orthopedics and dentistry to emerging areas such as dermatology, aesthetics, and chronic pain management.

CONCLUSION

The bibliometric analysis of PRP research reveals a multifaceted array of applications across various medical disciplines and highlights areas requiring further exploration, particularly in standardization, personalization, and safety. Future advancements in PRP research will necessitate innovative exploration, ethical considerations, and rigorous scientific validation to fully harness the therapeutic potential of PRP and related therapies.

Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of erectile dysfunction: A meta-analysis of controlled and single-arm trials

BACKGROUND

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a prevalent condition in urology, and studies on the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for this condition have been conducted; however, the evidence remains inconclusive. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of PRP in treating ED.

METHODS

On May 17, 2024, a literature search was performed and evaluated using the Cochrane method. The primary outcome measured was the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) score, while the secondary outcomes included Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) and peak systolic velocity (PSV).

RESULTS

A total of 12 controlled trials involving 991 patients and 11 single-arm trials with 377 patients were analyzed. The findings revealed that compared to the control group, the PRP group demonstrated better outcomes in terms of the IIEF score and MCID (SMD = 0.59 (95% CI: [0.34, 0.84]; RR = 1.94 (95% CI: [1.33, 2.83]), In the single-arm trials, a significant improvement in IIEF scores was observed following PRP treatment (SMD = -0.99 95% CI: [-1.53, 0.46]).

CONCLUSION

PRP appears effective in treating erectile dysfunction, but further high-quality, large-sample trials with longer follow-up are needed to fully understand its effects.

Clinical efficacy of intracavernous injection of platelet lysate for erectile dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Among the emerging treatments for erectile dysfunction (ED), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), known for its ability to enhance tissue repair and regeneration, stands out as a promising therapeutic approach. In this innovative study, we aimed to assess the efficacy of intracavernous injections of platelet lysate (PL), a derivative of PRP, in improving erectile function among ED patients.

METHODS

We enrolled twenty-six patients, aged between 35 and 70 years (mean age 51.6 ± 11.3 years), who had been experiencing ED for over six months and had an International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) score of 21 or less. Participants received autologous PL injections intracavernously every two weeks for a total of five administrations. We assessed Erection Hardness Score (EHS) and International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) bi-weekly for 16 weeks and conducted penile Doppler ultrasounds pre- and post-treatment to record peak systolic velocity (PSV) and resistance index (RI).

RESULTS

Before treatment, the mean EHS was 2.15 ± 0.88 and IIEF-5 was 10.92 ± 5.28. Remarkable improvements were observed post-treatment, with the EHS significantly increasing to 3.15 ± 0.83 (p < 0.05) and IIEF-5 to 17.23 ± 5.26 (p < 0.05). Penile Doppler ultrasound exhibited an increase in both PSV and RI post-treatment, with the rise in RI being statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that intracavernous injections of PL substantially enhance erectile function, as evidenced by improvements in EHS, IIEF-5, and the RI of penile Doppler ultrasound, without hemorrhagic events or other adverse reactions apart from temporary pain at the injection site during the 16-week follow-up period. These encouraging results suggest that PL injections are a safe and effective treatment modality for patients with moderate ED, potentially providing a less invasive and more physiologically friendly alternative to current ED management strategies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study received approval from the Institutional Review Board of National Taiwan University Hospital (IRB Number 202008061RIPC, date of registration 08/28/2020).

Proceedings of PRINCETON IV: PDE5 inhibitors and cardiac health symposium

INTRODUCTION

Prior consensus meetings have addressed the relationship between phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibition and cardiac health. Given significant accumulation of new data in the past decade, a fourth consensus conference on this topic was convened in Pasadena, California, on March 10 and 11, 2023.

OBJECTIVES

Our meeting aimed to update existing knowledge, assess current guidelines, and make recommendations for future research and practice in this area.

METHODS

An expert panel reviewed existing research and clinical practice guidelines.

RESULTS

Key findings and clinical recommendations are the following: First, erectile dysfunction (ED) is a risk marker and enhancer for cardiovascular (CV) disease. For men with ED and intermediate levels of CV risk, coronary artery calcium (CAC) computed tomography should be considered in addition to previous management algorithms. Second, sexual activity is generally safe for men with ED, although stress testing should still be considered for men with reduced exercise tolerance or ischemia. Third, the safety of PDE5 inhibitor use with concomitant medications was reviewed in depth, particularly concomitant use with nitrates or alpha-blockers. With rare exceptions, PDE5 inhibitors can be safely used in men being treated for hypertension, lower urinary tract symptoms and other common male disorders. Fourth, for men unresponsive to oral therapy or with absolute contraindications for PDE5 inhibitor administration, multiple treatment options can be selected. These were reviewed in depth with clinical recommendations. Fifth, evidence from retrospective studies points strongly toward cardioprotective effects of chronic PDE5-inhibitor use in men. Decreased rates of adverse cardiac outcomes in men taking PDE-5 inhibitors has been consistently reported from multiple studies. Sixth, recommendations were made regarding over-the-counter access and potential risks of dietary supplement adulteration. Seventh, although limited data exist in women, PDE5 inhibitors are generally safe and are being tested for use in multiple new indications.

CONCLUSION

Studies support the overall cardiovascular safety of the PDE5 inhibitors. New indications and applications were reviewed in depth.

Platelet-rich plasma intracavernosal injections for the treatment of primary organic erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of contemporary controlled studies

We aim to summarize the latest evidence on platelet-rich plasma (PRP) intracavernosal injections efficacy in men affected by primary organic erectile dysfunction (ED). We reviewed the literature for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or prospective and retrospective comparative studies evaluating PRP alone or in combination for ED treatment. A comprehensive search in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed for English language full-text articles or conference abstracts. A qualitative and quantitative data synthesis was provided. Overall, seven records were included: three RCTs evaluated PRP vs. placebo, one study separately tested PRP and low-intensity shock wave therapy (Li-SWT), three studies compared Li-SWT or low-intensity pulsed ultrasound alone with their combination with PRP. Of 641 included patients, 320 received PRP. Despite the heterogeneity among inclusion criteria, dose and protocol of PRP administration, and outcomes measured, most studies independently reported better sexual outcomes in patients who received PRP, without significant severe side effects. In meta-analysis, where only placebo-controlled studies were included, patients treated with PRP showed higher International Index of Erectile Function (erectile function domain) score compared to patients who received placebo: pooled mean difference (95% Confidence Interval) of 2.99 (1.86, 4.13) after 1 month (209 patients) vs. 2.85 (1.61, 4.09) after 3 months (204 patients) vs. 3.21 (1.82, 4.60) after 6 months (199 patients) of follow-up. In men affected by primary organic ED, PRP intracavernosal injections demonstrated an objective improvement or at least a tendency in erectile function recovery. Patient numbers, and the short-term follow-up may limit the generalizability of these observations. High quality, large-scale, and standardized controlled trials are needed before recommending its definitive use in clinical practice.

Platelet-rich plasma therapy in erectile dysfunction and Peyronie's disease: a systematic review of the literature

PURPOSE

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as a regenerative therapy has gained interest in the field of andrology for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) and Peyronie's disease (PD). This systematic review aims to critically evaluate the current evidence on the use of PRP for these conditions.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search according to the PRISMA guidelines using PubMed and Scopus databases in December 2023. Studies were included if they evaluated the effect of PRP therapy for ED or PD in humans.

RESULTS

We identified 164 articles, 17 of which were included, consisting of 11 studies on ED, 5 studies on PD, and 1 study on both. We included four randomized controlled trials, 11 prospective cohort studies, and three retrospective cohort studies including a total of 1099 patients. The studies on ED and PD generally showed small to moderate benefits with mild and transient side effects and no major adverse events were reported. General limitations included variations in PRP protocols, small sample sizes, short follow-up periods, and lack of control groups except in the three randomized trials on ED and the one on PD.

CONCLUSION

The literature on PRP therapy in andrology is limited and difficult to interpret due to variations in protocols and methodological drawbacks. Further research is necessary to determine the optimal preparation and treatment protocols for PRP therapy and clarify its effectiveness in andrology.

News and future perspectives of non-surgical treatments for erectile dysfunction

The significant discontinuation rate of available therapies and the paucity of curative options promoted the research on potential novel treatments suitable for erectile dysfunction patients. The aim of this study was to provide a summary of available evidence regarding the news and future perspectives related to the non-surgical treatment of erectile dysfunction. A narrative review of the literature was performed. A comprehensive search in the MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases was done. Papers in English-language, published until April 2022, were included. No chronological restriction was applied. Retrospective and prospective clinical studies, as well as meta-analyses, were considered. Oro-dispersible formulations of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors are particularly indicated in patients who have difficulty in swallowing solid dosage form; in addition, they constitute a discrete route of administration not requiring water. Low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy is indicated in mild vasculogenic erectile dysfunction and in patients with vasculogenic erectile dysfunction poorly responsive to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors. Stem cell therapy, platelet-rich plasma injections, and gene therapy seem promising regenerative treatments for selected patients with erectile dysfunction. Novel oral formulations of drugs commonly used in erectile dysfunction patients have recently become part of standard clinical practice. Regenerative treatments have been emerging in recent years and could become routine curative options in the near future. Further well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to provide conclusive evidence on this topic and guide appropriate recommendations.

Platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of erectile dysfunction: a systematic review of preclinical and clinical studies

INTRODUCTION

There has been tremendous growth in regenerative medicine during the last decade. For erectile dysfunction (ED), after the inclusion of low-intensity shockwave therapy as a treatment modality for ED management by the European Association of Urology sexual health guidelines, intracavernosal injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has gained popularity between urologists and patients as a novel ED therapeutic modality with initial promising results. However, limited clinical data exist regarding efficacy and safety in patients with ED. Furthermore, despite numerous preclinical studies in other tissues and organs, the mechanism of action for restoring erectile function remains undetermined.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aims to present the current status of preclinical and clinical evidence regarding the use of PRP as treatment option for ED.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane, and ScienceDirect databases, until February 2023 for studies exploring the effect of PRP on ED.

RESULTS

We identified 517 articles, 23 of which were included in this review. These were 7 preclinical (of which 1 was a comparative trial and 6 were placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials) and 16 clinical studies (of which 1 was a comparative trial, 5 were randomized trials, and 2 were placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials). Preclinical data support the regenerative role of PRP in erectile tissue, in accordance with existing evidence in other tissues. Randomized clinical studies, as well as the first 2 available randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials, showed promising efficacy and a lack of any adverse events.

CONCLUSION

As PRP for ED is widely used worldwide, there is an urgent need for high-quality studies with long-term follow-up. Standardization of research protocols, especially on the quality of PRP preparation, is also needed.

Low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy for erectile dysfunction: Myths and realities

To review the evidence of clinical efficacy of low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy (Li-ESWT) for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). A search on PubMed using Medical Subject Headings terms [((low intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy) OR (Li-ESWT)) AND (erectile dysfunction)] was conducted in August 2022, to obtain studies on the use of Li-ESWT for the treatment of ED. Its success rate in terms of International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) score and Erection Hardness Score (EHS) improvement was recorded and analysed. A total of 139 articles were reviewed. Overall, 52 studies were included in the final review. 17 studies were on vasculogenic ED, 5 on post pelvic surgery ED, 4 specifically on ED in diabetic patients, 24 on non-specified origin ED and 2 on mixed pathophysiological origin ED. The mean age of patients was 55.87±7.91 (standard deviation) years and the duration of ED was 4.36±2.08 years. The mean IIEF-5 score went from 12.04±2.67 at baseline to 16.12±5.72, 16.30±3.26 and 16.85±1.63 respectively at 3, 6 and 12 months. The mean EHS went from 2.00±0.46 at baseline to 2.58±0.60, 2.75±0.46 and 2.87±0.16 respectively at 3, 6 and 12 months. Li-ESWT may be a safe and efficacy option for the treatment and cure of ED. Further studies are needed to assess which patients are more suitable for this procedure and which Li-ESWT protocol can lead to the best outcomes.

Conservative Non-surgical Options for Erectile Dysfunction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This study aimed to review recent evidence on conservative non-surgical options for erectile dysfunction (ED) in men. A narrative review of the literature was performed. A comprehensive search in the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases was done. Papers in English language, published from May 2017 until May 2022, were included. Papers reporting basic research or animal research were excluded, as long as reviews or meta-analyses. Congress reports, clinical cases, or clinical trials protocols with no results were also excluded.

RECENT FINDINGS

We found a multitude of different treatment modalities for ED. We must take into account the type of patient, their comorbidities, the origin of their ED, and its severity in order to reproduce effective results using these therapies. Some of the treatments show good results with a good level of evidence (new IPDE5 formulations, intracavernous injections, shock wave therapy, hormonal theraphy, psycho-sexual theraphy). However, others (some new molecules, stem cell theraphy, platelet-rich plasma injections, oxygenation-based therapy, nutraceuticals), although some of them present promising results, require randomized studies with a larger number of patients and a longer follow-up time to be able to establish firm recommendations. Regarding the conservative treatment of erectile dysfunction, in recent years, some therapies have been consolidated as effective and safe for certain types of patients. On the other hand, other treatment modalities, although promising, still lack the evidence and the necessary follow-up to be recommended in daily practice.

Recent advances in stem cell therapy for erectile dysfunction: a narrative review

INTRODUCTION

While phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5is) and others are used to treat Erectile dysfunction (ED), many patients are either unresponsive or resistant to it. Stem cell therapy (SCT) is a promising alternative approach. Numerous preclinical trials have demonstrated improved erectile function in animal models using SCT, although the number of clinical trials investigating SCT for men with ED is limited. Nonetheless, findings from human clinical trials suggest that SCT may be a useful treatment option.

AREAS COVERED

Biomedical literature, including PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and European Union Clinical Trials Registry, were analyzed to summarize and synthesize information on stem cell therapy for ED in this narrative review. The achievements in preclinical and clinical evaluations are presented and critically analyzed.

EXPERT OPINION

SCT has demonstrated some benefits in improving erectile function, while further studies are urgently needed. Such studies would provide valuable insights into the optimal use of stem cell therapy and its potential as a therapeutic option for ED. Taking advantage of different mechanisms of action involved in various regenerative therapies, combination therapies such as SCT and low-energy shock waves or platelet-rich plasma may provide a more effective therapy and warrant further research.

Erectile dysfunction: Is platelet-rich plasma the new frontier for treatment in patients with erectile dysfunction? A review of the existing evidence

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is one of the commonest disorders in adult males and affects 12–19% of men of reproductive age. Only few studies have evaluated the impact of ED on men and couples with infertility—these studies report higher rates of ED in this sub-group of men compared to the general population, with the prevalence of ED in men diagnosed with male infertility ranging from 6.7 to 61.6%. Nevertheless, ED is considered a rare cause of male infertility, accounting for about 0.4–5% of all causes of male infertility. ED remains a poorly treated condition globally and current therapies, like oral medication, offer only temporary symptomatic relief and do not influence disease progression—patients are potentially on lifelong treatment, with ED worsening over time. In contrast, regenerative medicine may potentially reverse or halt the progression of ED processes. In this article, we review the evidence for intracavernosal injections of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in the treatment of ED.

Assessment of the intracavernosal injection platelet-rich plasma in addition to daily oral tadalafil intake in diabetic patients with erectile dysfunction non-responding to on-demand oral PDE5 inhibitors

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ICI of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in addition to daily oral tadalafil intake in diabetic erectile dysfunction (ED) patients non-responding to PDE5 inhibitors. Overall, 48 patients complaining of ED non-responding to on-demand PDE5 inhibitors were allocated into 2 equal groups, diabetics and non-diabetics that were given a daily dose of 5 mg tadalafil plus vardenafil 20 mg on demand during the study besides being subjected to 3 doses of ICI of PRP, 4 weeks apart. Responses to on-demand PDE5 inhibitors, International index of erectile function-5 (IIEF-5) score, erection hardness scores (EHS) and pharmaco-dynamic duplex studies were assessed. After PRP injections, 33% and 50% of cases were satisfied with on-demand PDE5 inhibitors, respectively, whereas 41% and 66% of them showed improved EHS response. Compared with baseline scores, the mean IIEF-5 scores were significantly improved after PRP therapy in the diabetic ED group (12.1 vs. 8.04, p = 0.003) as well as in the non-diabetic ED group (14.8 vs. 10.2, p = 0.001) linked to pharmaco-penile duplex readings. Both good and fair diabetic control exhibited significant responses to ICI therapy of PRP compared with bad controlled cases. The significant improvement included; the IIEF-5 score increase (86.7%, 126% vs. 16.1%), improved EHS as well as penile duplex readings. Baseline HbA1C demonstrated a significant negative correlation with IIEF-5 score before (p = 0.019) and after PRP therapy (p = 0.002) respectively. It could be concluded that ICI of PRP could be an effective therapy for treating ED patients non-responding to on-demand oral PDE5 treatment.