Testicular biopsies in men with testicular microlithiasis and additional risk factors for cancer: A case series

BACKGROUND

Testicular microlithiasis is the presence of small calcifications in the testicular parenchyma. The association between testicular microlithiasis and germ cell neoplasia in situ, a precursor to testicular cancer, is still unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the incidence of germ cell neoplasia in situ in men with testicular microlithiasis and evaluate the indication for testicular biopsy according to risk factors in the form of male infertility/reduced semen quality, testicular atrophy, and history of cryptorchidism.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective case series included all patients diagnosed with testicular microlithiasis who underwent testicular biopsies at three hospitals in Denmark between 2007 and 2021. The medical records of 167 patients were reviewed, and data on patient demographics, testicular microlithiasis characteristics, risk factors, histological findings, and treatments were collected. The main outcome measure was the incidence of germ cell neoplasia in situ in relation to each risk factor. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Logistic regression was used to examine the odds ratio of germ cell neoplasia in situ in patients with testicular microlithiasis and testicular atrophy.

RESULTS

Germ cell neoplasia in situ was found in 13 out of 167 patients (7.8% [95% confidence interval: 4.3, 13.2]). Eleven of these had testicular atrophy resulting in a significantly higher incidence in this group than other risk factors (odds ratio 9.36 [95% confidence interval: 2.41, 61.88]; p = 0.004).

DISCUSSION

The study comprises the largest cohort to date of men who have undergone testicular biopsies because of testicular microlithiasis and additional risk factors. Limitations include its retrospective design, and relatively low absolute numbers of patients with germ cell neoplasia in situ on biopsies.

CONCLUSION

This study found that men with testicular microlithiasis and testicular atrophy are at an increased risk of germ cell neoplasia in situ. Additionally, our results indicate that biopsies should be considered in men with a combination of subfertility and bilateral testicular microlithiasis. Our findings do not support testicular biopsies for men with testicular microlithiasis and other risk factors.

Vaccines to prevent COVID-19: A living systematic review with Trial Sequential Analysis and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 is rapidly spreading causing extensive burdens across the world. Effective vaccines to prevent COVID-19 are urgently needed.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

Our objective was to assess the effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 vaccines through analyses of all currently available randomized clinical trials. We searched the databases CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and other sources from inception to June 17, 2021 for randomized clinical trials assessing vaccines for COVID-19. At least two independent reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risks of bias. We conducted meta-analyses, network meta-analyses, and Trial Sequential Analyses (TSA). Our primary outcomes included all-cause mortality, vaccine efficacy, and serious adverse events. We assessed the certainty of evidence with GRADE. We identified 46 trials; 35 trials randomizing 219 864 participants could be included in our analyses. Our meta-analyses showed that mRNA vaccines (efficacy, 95% [95% confidence interval (CI), 92% to 97%]; 71 514 participants; 3 trials; moderate certainty); inactivated vaccines (efficacy, 61% [95% CI, 52% to 68%]; 48 029 participants; 3 trials; moderate certainty); protein subunit vaccines (efficacy, 77% [95% CI, -5% to 95%]; 17 737 participants; 2 trials; low certainty); and viral vector vaccines (efficacy 68% [95% CI, 61% to 74%]; 71 401 participants; 5 trials; low certainty) prevented COVID-19. Viral vector vaccines decreased mortality (risk ratio, 0.25 [95% CI 0.09 to 0.67]; 67 563 participants; 3 trials, low certainty), but comparable data on inactivated, mRNA, and protein subunit vaccines were imprecise. None of the vaccines showed evidence of a difference on serious adverse events, but observational evidence suggested rare serious adverse events. All the vaccines increased the risk of non-serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence suggests that all the included vaccines are effective in preventing COVID-19. The mRNA vaccines seem most effective in preventing COVID-19, but viral vector vaccines seem most effective in reducing mortality. Further trials and longer follow-up are necessary to provide better insight into the safety profile of these vaccines.

Gustatory sweating in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: Prevalence and risk factors

Objective

Gustatory sweating (GS) is characterized by profuse sweating during or immediately after ingestion of food and is known as a complication of diabetes mellitus (DM). This study aimed to determine the prevalence of GS and to characterize the sweating in a cohort of patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T1DM and T2DM) as compared with a control group.

Methods

In a cross‐sectional study, 665 outpatients with T1DM and 505 outpatients with T2DM filled in an 8‐point questionnaire about GS. Answers were paired with medical data from the electronic patient records to explore associations with DM complications. The control group consisted of 1158 persons without DM answering the same questionnaire in an online version.

Results

In people with T1DM and T2DM, the prevalence of GS was 10% (95% CI 7%–12%) and 13% (95% CI 10%–16%), respectively. In the control group, the prevalence of GS was 5% (95% CI 3%–6%). Most commonly, people sweat on the face and/or head and upper body with a duration of 10–30 min albeit in the control group <10 min. In patients with T1DM, increased HbA1c was associated with GS (OR 1.3 [95% CI 1.05–1.6], p = .016), and in T2DM, younger age (OR 0.95 [95% CI 0.92–0.99), p = .006), presence of severe peripheral neuropathy (OR 2.33 [95% CI 1.04–5.2], p = .039) and absence of proliferative retinopathy were associated with GS (OR 0.22 [95% CI 0.07–0.71], p = .011).

Conclusion

We found the prevalence of gustatory sweating of 11% in a hospital‐based cohort of patients with T1DM and T2DM. This was twice as high as in non‐diabetic control persons. Associations between GS and known diabetes complications could only be demonstrated in T2DM. Compared with a control group without DM, odds for GS are higher in people with DM and age >45.