The effect of continuous levodopa treatment during the afternoon hours

Optimization of oral entacapone administration in patients undergoing levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel treatment

BACKGROUND

Levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) treatment markedly reduces motor fluctuations in patients with Parkinson's disease; however, some patients undergoing LCIG treatment may demonstrate clinical deterioration in the afternoon. Entacapone, a catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor, may be a promising adjunctive option for LCIG-treated patients; however, the optimal timing of oral entacapone administration to ameliorate clinical symptoms in the afternoon remains unexplored. This study aimed to investigate the optimal timing of oral entacapone administration in patients with Parkinson's disease undergoing LCIG treatment.

METHODS

Pharmacokinetic analysis and symptom assessment were performed on three days: a day without entacapone administration, day with oral entacapone administration at 13:00, and day with oral entacapone administration at 15:00.

RESULTS

Eight LCIG-treated patients were enrolled, of whom seven completed this study. The relative plasma concentrations of levodopa with entacapone administration at 13:00 were gradually increased, especially at 18:00 and were significantly higher than those without entacapone administration (127.10 ± 25.06% vs. 97.51 ± 22.20%). The relative plasma concentrations of 3-O-methyldopa were gradually increased without entacapone administration, whereas those with entacapone administration at 13:00 were lower than those without entacapone administration, especially at 17:00 (97.47 ± 3.70% vs. 110.71 ± 9.84%). Administering oral entacapone at 15:00 increased and decreased the relative plasma concentrations of levodopa and 3-O-methyldopa, respectively, but without significant difference. The "Off" time was shorter with entacapone administration at 13:00 (0.43 ± 0.79 h) and at 15:00 (0.57 ± 0.79 h) than that without entacapone administration (1.14 ± 1.46 h).

CONCLUSIONS

The concomitant use of oral entacapone in the early afternoon may be effective in improving afternoon symptoms in patients undergoing LCIG treatment.

Why do 'OFF' periods still occur during continuous drug delivery in Parkinson's disease?

Continuous drug delivery (CDD) is used in moderately advanced and late-stage Parkinson’s disease (PD) to control motor and non-motor fluctuations (‘OFF’ periods). Transdermal rotigotine is indicated for early fluctuations, while subcutaneous apomorphine infusion and levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel are utilised in advanced PD. All three strategies are considered examples of continuous dopaminergic stimulation achieved through CDD. A central premise of the CDD is to achieve stable control of the parkinsonian motor and non-motor states and avoid emergence of ‘OFF’ periods. However, data suggest that despite their efficacy in reducing the number and duration of ‘OFF’ periods, these strategies still do not prevent ‘OFF’ periods in the middle to late stages of PD, thus contradicting the widely held concepts of continuous drug delivery and continuous dopaminergic stimulation. Why these emergent ‘OFF’ periods still occur is unknown. In this review, we analyse the potential reasons for their persistence. The contribution of drug- and device-related involvement, and the problems related to site-specific drug delivery are analysed. We propose that changes in dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic mechanisms in the basal ganglia might render these persistent ‘OFF’ periods unresponsive to dopaminergic therapy delivered via CDD.

Levodopa–entacapone–carbidopa intestinal gel infusion in advanced Parkinson’s disease: real-world experience and practical guidance

As Parkinson’s disease (PD) progresses, treatment needs to be adapted to maintain symptom control. Once patients develop advanced PD, an optimised regimen of oral and transdermal medications may no longer provide adequate relief of OFF periods and motor complications can emerge. At this point, patients may wish to consider a device-aided therapy (DAT) that provides continuous dopaminergic stimulation to help overcome these issues. Levodopa–entacapone–carbidopa intestinal gel (LECIG) infusion is a recently developed DAT option. The aim of this article is twofold: (1) to give an overview of the pharmacokinetics of LECIG infusion and clinical experience to date of its use in patients with advanced PD, including real-world data and patient-reported outcomes from a cohort of patients treated in Sweden, the first country where it was introduced, and (2) based on that information to provide practical guidance for healthcare teams starting patients on LECIG infusion, whether they are transitioning from oral medications or from other DATs, including recommendations for stepwise dosing calculation and titration. In terms of clinical efficacy, LECIG infusion has been shown to have a similar effect on motor function to standard levodopa–carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) infusion but, due to the presence of entacapone in LECIG, the bioavailability of levodopa is increased such that lower overall levodopa doses can be given to achieve therapeutically effective plasma concentrations. From a practical standpoint, LECIG infusion is delivered using a smaller cartridge and pump system than LCIG infusion. In addition, for patients previously treated with LCIG infusion who have an existing percutaneous endoscopic transgastric jejunostomy (PEG-J) system, this is compatible with the LECIG infusion system. As it is a relatively new product, the long-term efficacy and safety of LECIG infusion remain to be established; however, real-world data will continue to be collected and analysed to provide this information and help inform future clinical decisions.

Real-Life Use of Levodopa/Carbidopa Intestinal Gel in Parkinson's Disease According to Analysis of Pump Data

BACKGROUND

Levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) infusion is an efficacious treatment of motor and non-motor fluctuations in people with Parkinson's disease (PD). Real-life use of the treatment is not previously studied.

OBJECTIVE

The aims of the study were to explore the use of LCIG and to determine how extra doses of LCIG are used in daily life.

METHODS

Twenty-five PD patients with ongoing LCIG therapy were consecutively included. Pump data was retrieved from 30 days on average, by means of software, extracting the most recent pump events.

RESULTS

The daily duration of infusion was 15 hours on average, in 18 patients, whereas the remaining 7 patients used 24-hour infusion. Morning doses ranged from 38-190 mg levodopa, for patients who utilized this function. Median number of daily extra doses was 2.5 (range: 0-10.6) and median size of the extra dose was 24 mg (0-80 mg) levodopa. Median total daily levodopa intake with LCIG was 1201 mg (range: 417-2322 mg).

CONCLUSION

Retrieving pump data is possible and may be important for evaluating the at-home use of LCIG, to optimize the therapy. Adherence to treatment should be monitored, which is not technically difficult, at least in device-aided treatments for PD.

Fasting state is one of the factors associated with plasma levodopa fluctuations during levodopa‒carbidopa intestinal gel treatment

INTRODUCTION

Some patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) undergoing levodopa‒carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) treatment experience motor fluctuations in the afternoon. The migrating motor complex, a specific periodic migrating contraction pattern occurring in the stomach and small intestine during the fasting state, can affect drug absorption. We aimed to compare the pharmacokinetic parameters between two conditions (with and without lunch) and assessed the influence of the fasting state on the levodopa pharmacokinetics in LCIG treatment.

METHODS

We evaluated the levodopa pharmacokinetics from 12:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. in 10 LCIG-treated PD patients in the presence and absence of lunch.

RESULTS

The maintenance dose of LCIG correlated strongly with the mean plasma concentration of levodopa in the absence (r = 0.94, coefficient of determination (R²) = 0.89, p < 0.001) or presence of lunch (r = 0.96, R² = 0.93, p < 0.001). Comparison of the pharmacokinetic parameters revealed that the coefficient of variation was significantly greater in the condition without lunch than in the condition with lunch (p = 0.004): 16.73% (4.88%) without lunch and 9.22% (3.80%) with lunch. There were no significant differences in the mean plasma concentration of levodopa (p = 0.49) and area under the plasma concentration‒time curve (p = 0.27) between the two conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma concentrations of levodopa fluctuated more in patients undergoing LCIG treatment without than with lunch. Our results indicate that a small amount of food intake may be a better corrective approach for worsening of symptoms in the fasting state rather than additional levodopa.

How Time Rules: Diurnal Motor Patterns in de novo Parkinson’s Disease

Background: Several small-scale studies have shown that motor performance in Parkinson’s disease (PD) fluctuates throughout the day. Studies specifically focusing on de novo patients are, however, lacking. Objective: To evaluate the effect of clock time on motor performance in de novo drug-naïve patients with PD. Methods: We retrieved MDS-UPDRS III scores for 421 de novo PD patients from the PPMI cohort and stratified them into three groups based on time of assessment: group 1) 7:00–10:00; group 2) 10:00–13:00, and group 3) 13:00–18:00. Groups were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test and results corrected for multiple testing. In addition, we obtained 27 wearable sensor reports, objectively capturing bradykinesia scores in a home setting over a 6-day continuous period, in 12 drug-naïve patients from the Parkinson’s Kinetigraph Registry held at King’s College Hospital London. Time spent in severe bradykinesia scores were broken down into five daytime (06:00–21:00) three-hourly epochs and scores compared using the Friedman test. Results: There were no group differences in demographic or other clinical variables for the cross-sectional analysis. MDS-UPDRS III total scores worsened significantly during the course of the day (median 18 (group 1); 20 (group 2); and 23 (group 3); p = 0.001). In the longitudinal wearable sensor cohort, diurnal variations were present in percentage of time spent in severe bradykinesia (p < 0.001) with the lowest percentage during the 09:00–12:00 epoch (69.56±16.68%), when most patients are awake and start daily activity, and the highest percentage during the 18:00–21:00 epoch (73.58±16.35%). Conclusion: This exploratory study shows the existence of a diurnal pattern of motor function in patients with de novo PD. The results obtained were corroborated by objective measurements in a small longitudinal cohort confirming a similar diurnal motor score variation.

Initial Experience of the Levodopa-Entacapone-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel in Clinical Practice

Patients in fluctuating stages of Parkinson’s disease (PD) require device-aided treatments. Continuous infusion of levodopa–carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) is a well-proven option in clinical practice. We now report the first clinical experience of levodopa–entacapone–carbidopa intestinal gel (LECIG) therapy. An observational study of the first patients to start LECIG in our clinic was performed. Twenty-four patients (11 females, 13 males) were included. The median age was 71.5 years, and the median duration since PD diagnosis was 15.5 years. The median treatment duration was 305 days. Median doses were: 6.0 mL as morning dose, 2.5 mL/h as infusion rate, and 1.0 mL as extra dose. Half of the patients were switched directly from LCIG. These patients express improvements in the size and weight of the pump. Furthermore, most of them considered the new pump to be improved regarding user-friendliness. Six patients discontinued LECIG, three due to diarrhea, one due to hallucinations and two deceased (one cardiac arrest and one COVID-19). LECIG has shown to be possible to use in patients with PD, efficacy and safety as expected. Patients are generally happy with the size and usability of the pump, but some technical improvements of the software are warranted, as well as larger, prospective studies.

What can we learn from the effect of trihexyphenidyl on motor fluctuations during continuous levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel infusion (LCIG)? - First documented case

Motor fluctuations can be seen even during treatment with continuous levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel infusion (LCIG). We report on a middle-aged man with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) on LCIG in which motor fluctuations have been improved with an anticholinergic. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no previous LCIG cases reported with motor fluctuations responding to non-dopaminergic agent, which might reveal some clues to its pathophysiology. Long-term oral levodopa treatment is associated with development of potentially disabling motor complications including motor fluctuations and dyskinesias in the majority of patients with PD. It has been suggested that motor complications are related to the nonphysiological restoration of brain dopamine with intermittent administration of standard oral levodopa. LCIG significantly reduces “off” time and increases “on” time without dyskinesia in comparison to standard oral levodopa through consistent plasma concentration of levodopa to restore brain dopamine in a more physiological manner. However, it has been reported that PD patients on LCIG often worsen during the afternoon hours, even with stable plasma concentration of levodopa. This raises the possibility that additional factors to dopamine deficiency could play a role in occurrence of motor fluctuations. Here we offer a hypothesis that altered cholinergic signaling could also be involved in the pathophysiology of motor fluctuations, based on our clinical evidence that anticholinergic drug has eliminated motor fluctuations during LCIG in a patient with PD. Further studies for non-dopaminergic along with dopaminergic signaling may be needed to better understand the pathophysiological basis of motor complications in PD.

•

Motor fluctuations can occur during the afternoon hours in Parkinson's patients even on LCIG.

•

Anticholinergic agent could be an option for treating the motor fluctuations during LCIG.

•

Altered cholinergic signaling might be involved in occurrence of motor fluctuations.

Complex dyskinesias in Parkinson patients on levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel

BACKGROUND

Levodopa-carbidopa intestinal infusion is an effective treatment for motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease. However, it has been recently associated with emergent complex/atypical dyskinesias. We sought to characterize patients who developed these dyskinesias after levodopa infusion initiation, and to compare these patients to a control population with conventional motor fluctuations.

METHODS

208 Parkinson's disease patients, treated with levodopa intestinal infusion due to motor fluctuations, were screened for onset and/or worsening of dyskinesias after initiation of levodopa infusion, resistant to the routine titration, and presenting with atypical or unexpected patterns. Patients with extensive follow-up data were enrolled for a longitudinal analysis. Cases were compared to a control sample with conventional motor fluctuations in order to investigate predisposing factors, difference in dyskinesia phenotype, management strategies and dropouts.

RESULTS

Thirty patients out of 208 (14.4%) reported atypical (i.e. long-lasting) biphasic, biphasic-like (i.e. continuous) or mixed (peak-dose and continuous biphasic) dyskinesias after levodopa infusion. They were compared at baseline and follow-up to a sample of 49 patients with conventional motor fluctuations on levodopa infusion. Both groups had similar demographic and clinical features, except the former having higher prevalence of biphasic dyskinesias while on oral therapy. Biphasic-like dyskinesias in nearly half the number of cases improved with increasing the dopaminergic load, while mixed dyskinesias had the worst outcome and highest dropout rate (58%).

CONCLUSIONS

Atypical biphasic, biphasic-like and complex dyskinesias could hinder the course of patients treated with levodopa infusion. This study further informs the selection process of advanced therapies, particularly in dyskinetic patients.