Targeted antenatal anti-D prophylaxis program for RhD-negative pregnant women - outcome of the first two years of a national program in Finland

Implementation and mixed method evaluation of a unique midwife-prescribed, pharmacist-administered routine antenatal Anti-D prophylaxis model in pregnant people

BACKGROUND

Routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis, an injected blood product, reduces the risk of rhesus (D) sensitisation in rhesus negative pregnancies. One New Zealand district implemented this service through a unique model using midwives to prescribe and community pharmacists to administer and manage anti-D.

AIM

To describe the model and its implementation and ascertain uptake, cost, acceptability to service users and stakeholders, and potential improvements.

METHODS

An audit compared uptake from October 1, 2021 to May 31, 2023 with the eligible population. A cross-sectional survey of service users, midwives, pharmacists and staff supporting the service delivery was conducted in 2023. A cost analysis was undertaken.

RESULTS

At least one dose of anti-D was administered in 300 of 522 eligible pregnancies (57 %), although this was significantly lower in those with Māori ethnicity (35 %, p = 0.008 versus European ethnicity), or increased parity. Uptake increased over time. All groups surveyed highly preferred (74-86 %) the existing model over alternatives. Service users would highly recommend (95 %) the pharmacy they attended to others eligible for anti-D. Pharmacists were very satisfied with the service and ease of administration but experienced challenges, e.g. service users presenting without the required blood test first and insufficient staffing. Midwife-pharmacist communication was sometimes rated poorly. Courier and pharmacy costs were 3 % and 10 % of the total cost, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Anti-D prescribed by midwives and administered by community pharmacists is convenient for service users, low cost, and the preferred model for service users, midwives and pharmacists. Uptake needs to increase and focus on equity.

Optimizing RhD Immune Globulin Use in Pregnancy

The global shortage of RhD immune globulin, formally acknowledged by the Food and Drug Administration in 2023, is ongoing but has improved in recent months. In response, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) issued guidance in March 2024 on alternative strategies to conserve RhD immune globulin supplies. Our objective is to evaluate strategies for optimizing RhD immune globulin use in pregnancy amidst a global shortage.This clinical opinion reviews guidance on strategies to conserve RhD immune globulin. These include targeted administration based on non-invasive fetal RhD genotyping using cell-free DNA (cfDNA), the use of alternative RhD immune globulin products, and selective withholding of prophylaxis in early pregnancy loss under 12 weeks' gestation. ACOG guidance on the administration of RhD immune globulin in pregnancy differs from many countries worldwide, as well as the World Health Organization and the American Society of Family Planning.Targeted administration and the use of non-invasive cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing for fetal RhD status have shown promising accuracy and reliability in studies across multiple countries, leading to reduced unnecessary prophylaxis and potential cost savings. Additionally, withholding RhD immune globulin in select early pregnancy losses could further conserve resources without increasing alloimmunization risk.This review underscores the need for evidence-based approaches to manage limited RhD immune globulin supplies effectively and suggests that targeted prophylaxis could benefit both patient outcomes and healthcare resource allocation in the face of global shortages. · Alternative RhD immune globulin strategies are vital amid ongoing global shortages.. · Targeted administration using cfDNA testing reduces unnecessary RhD immune globulin use.. · Consider withholding RhD immune globulin in <12-week pregnancy loss without instrumentation..

The use of free DNA for fetal RHD genotyping in the Rh negative pregnant patient-the time has come

Cell-free DNA to determine the fetal RHD genotype from the maternal circulation was first described in 1993. High throughput assays using polymerase chain reaction technology were introduced in Europe and gained widespread acceptance in the management of the Rhesus alloimmunized pregnancy. The specificity and sensitivity of these assays approached 99%. As confidence was gained with these results, Scandinavian countries began to employ cell-free DNA for fetal RHD typing as an integral component of their introduction of antenatal Rhesus immune globulin in non-alloimmunized pregnancies. Since 40% of RhD-negative pregnant women will carry an RhD-negative fetus, doses of Rhesus immune globulin were conserved. Recently 2 U.S. companies have introduced cell-free DNA assays for RHD as part of their noninvasive prenatal testing assays. Both utilize next generation sequencing and have developed methodologies to detect the aberrant RHD pseudogene and the hybrid RHD-CE-Ds genotype. In addition, excellent correlation studies with either neonatal genotyping or serology have been reported. The manufacturer of RhoGAM has recently announced a national shortage. Given the current availability of reliable cell-free DNA assays for determining the RHD status of the fetus, the time has come to implement this strategy to triage the antenatal use of Rhesus immune globulin in the U.S.

Why do RhD negative pregnant women still become anti-D immunized despite prophylaxis with anti-D immunoglobulin?

Maternal allo-anti-D in RhD negative pregnant women may cause mild to severe hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Although several other antibodies may also destroy red blood cells of the fetus and newborn, preventive measures with anti-D immunoglobulin are only available for D antigen. Targeted antenatal care together with postpartum prophylaxis with anti-D immunoglobulin has significantly reduced the D-alloimmunization risk. Potentially sensitizing events like trauma to the pregnant abdomen, vaginal bleeding, and amniocentesis may lead to fetomaternal hemorrhage and necessitate additional doses. Despite comprehensive programs with these targeted measures, allo-anti-D is still the most common reason for severe hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Where do we fail then? Here, in this review, I would therefore like to discuss the reasons for D-alloimmunizations hoping that the greater focus will pave the way for further reduction in the number of pregnancy-related allo-anti-Ds.

Low titer group O whole blood and risk of RhD alloimmunization: Rationale for use in Finland

BACKGROUND

Prehospital low-titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) used for patients with life-threatening hemorrhage is often RhD positive. The most important complication following RhD alloimmunization is hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). Preceding clinical use of RhD positive LTOWB, we estimated the risk of HDFN due to LTOWB prehospital transfusion in the Finnish population.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We collected data on prehospital transfusions in Tampere and Helsinki University Hospital areas. Using the mean of reported alloimmunization rates in trauma studies (24%) and a higher reported rate representing trauma patients of 13-50 years old (42.7%), we estimated the risk of HDFN and extrapolated it to the whole of Finland.

RESULTS

We estimated that in Finland, with the current prehospital transfusion rate we would see 1-3 cases of severe HDFN due to prehospital LTOWB transfusions every 10 years, and fetal death due to HDFN caused by LTOWB transfusion less than once in 100 years.

DISCUSSION

The estimated risk of serious HDFN due to prehospital LTOWB transfusion in the Finnish population is similar to previous estimates. As Finland routinely screens expectant mothers for red blood cell antibodies and as the contemporary treatment of HDFN is very effective, we support the prehospital use of RhD positive LTOWB in all patient groups.

Antenatal RHD screening to guide antenatal anti-D immunoprophylaxis in non-immunized D- pregnant women

In pregnancy, D- pregnant women may be at risk of becoming immunized against D when carrying a D+ fetus, which may eventually lead to hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Administrating antenatal and postnatal anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis decreases the risk of immunization substantially. Noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping, based on testing cell-free DNA extracted from maternal plasma, offers a reliable tool to predict the fetal RhD phenotype during pregnancy. Used as a screening program, antenatal RHD screening can guide the administration of antenatal prophylaxis in non-immunized D- pregnant women so that unnecessary prophylaxis is avoided in those women who carry a D- fetus. In Europe, antenatal RHD screening programs have been running since 2009, demonstrating high test accuracies and program feasibility. In this review, an overview is provided of current state-of-the-art antenatal RHD screening, which includes discussions on the rationale for its implementation, methodology, detection strategies, and test performance. The performance of antenatal RHD screening in a routine setting is characterized by high accuracy, with a high diagnostic sensitivity of ≥99.9 percent. The result of using antenatal RHD screening is that 97-99 percent of the women who carry a D- fetus avoid unnecessary prophylaxis. As such, this activity contributes to avoiding unnecessary treatment and saves valuable anti-D immunoglobulin, which has a shortage worldwide. The main challenges for a reliable noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping assay are low cell-free DNA levels, the genetics of the Rh blood group system, and choosing an appropriate detection strategy for an admixed population. In many parts of the world, however, the main challenge is to improve the basic care for D- pregnant women.

Fetal RHD Screening in RH1 Negative Pregnant Women: Experience in Switzerland

RH1 incompatibility between mother and fetus can cause hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. In Switzerland, fetal RHD genotyping from maternal blood has been recommended from gestational age 18 onwards since the year 2020. This facilitates tailored administration of RH immunoglobulin (RHIG) only to RH1 negative women carrying a RH1 positive fetus. Data from 30 months of noninvasive fetal RHD screening is presented. Cell-free DNA was extracted from 7192 plasma samples using a commercial kit, followed by an in-house qPCR to detect RHD exons 5 and 7, in addition to an amplification control. Valid results were obtained from 7072 samples, with 4515 (64%) fetuses typed RHD positive and 2556 (36%) fetuses being RHD negative. A total of 120 samples led to inconclusive results due to the presence of maternal or fetal RHD variants (46%), followed by women being serologically RH1 positive (37%), and technical issues (17%). One sample was typed false positive, possibly due to contamination. No false negative results were observed. We show that unnecessary administration of RHIG can be avoided for more than one third of RH1 negative pregnant women in Switzerland. This reduces the risks of exposure to a blood-derived product and conserves this limited resource to women in actual need.

Terminating Routine Cord Blood RhD Typing of the Newborns to Guide Postnatal Anti-D Immunoglobulin Prophylaxis Based on the Results of Fetal RHD Genotyping

INTRODUCTION

Targeted routine antenatal prophylaxis with anti-D immunoglobulin (Ig) only to RhD-negative pregnant women who carry RhD-positive fetuses (determined by fetal RHD genotyping) has reduced D-alloimmunization significantly when administered in addition to postnatal prophylaxis. Achieving high analysis sensitivity and few false-negative fetal RHD results will make RhD typing of the newborn redundant. Postnatal prophylaxis can then be given based on the result of fetal RHD genotyping. Terminating routine RhD typing of the newborns in cord blood will streamline maternity care. Accordingly, we compared the results of fetal RHD genotyping with RhD typing of the newborns.

METHODS

Fetal RHD genotyping was performed, and antenatal anti-D Ig was administered at gestational week 24 and 28, respectively. Data for 2017-2020 are reported.

RESULTS

Ten laboratories reported 18,536 fetal RHD genotypings, and 16,378 RhD typing results of newborns. We found 46 false-positive (0.28%) and seven false-negative (0.04%) results. Sensitivity of the assays was 99.93%, while specificity was 99.24%.

CONCLUSION

Few false-negative results support the good analysis quality of fetal RHD genotyping. Routine cord blood RhD typing will therefore be discontinued nationwide and postnatal anti-D Ig will now be given based on the result of fetal RHD genotyping.

Reappraisal of evolving methods in non-invasive prenatal screening: Discovery, biology and clinical utility

Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) offers an opportunity to screen or determine features associated with the fetus. Earlier, prenatal testing was done with cytogenetic procedures like karyotyping or fluorescence in-situ hybridization, which necessitated invasive methods such as fetal blood sampling, chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis. Over the last two decades, there has been a paradigm shift away from invasive prenatal diagnostic methods to non-invasive ones. NIPS tests heavily rely on cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA). This DNA is released into the maternal circulation by placenta. Like cffDNA, fetal cells such as nucleated red blood cells, placental trophoblasts, leukocytes, and exosomes or fetal RNA circulating in maternal plasma, have enormous potential in non-invasive prenatal testing, but their use is still limited due to a number of limitations. Non-invasive approaches currently use circulating fetal DNA to assess the fetal genetic milieu. Methods with an acceptable detection rate and specificity such as sequencing, methylation, or PCR, have recently gained popularity in NIPS. Now that NIPS has established clinical significance in prenatal screening and diagnosis, it is critical to gain insights into and comprehend the genesis of NIPS de novo. The current review reappraises the development and emergence of non-invasive prenatal screen/test approaches, as well as their clinical application, with a focus, on the scope, benefits, and limitations.

Single-exon approach to non-invasive fetal RHD screening in early pregnancy: An update after 10 years' experience

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Anti-D prophylaxis, administered to RhD-negative women, has significantly reduced the incidence of RhD immunization. Non-invasive fetal RHD screening has been used in Stockholm for more than 10 years to identify women who will benefit from prophylaxis. The method is based on a single-exon approach and is used in early pregnancy. The aim of this study was to update the performance of the method.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The single exon assay from Devyser AB is a multiplex kit detecting both exon 4 of the RHD gene and the housekeeping gene GAPDH. Cell-free DNA was extracted from 1 ml of plasma from EDTA blood taken during early pregnancy, weeks 10-12. The genetic RHD results were compared with serological typing of newborns for a determination of sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

In total, 4337 pregnancies were included in the study; 44 samples (1%) were inconclusive either due to maternal RHD gene variants (n = 34) or technical reasons (n = 10). Of the remaining 4293 pregnancies, a total number of nine discrepant results were found. False positive results (n = 7) were mainly (n = 4) due to RHD gene variants in the child. False-negative results were found in two cases, of which one was caused by a technical error. None of the false-negative cases was due to RHD gene variants. Overall, the sensitivity of the method was 99.93% and specificity 99.56%.

CONCLUSION

The single-exon assay used in this study is correlated with high sensitivity and specificity.

RHD exon 5, 7 and 10 targeted non-invasive prenatal screening of fetal Rhesus-D (RhD) in selected RhD negative pregnant women in Ethiopia

BACKGROUND

A majority of non-invasive prenatal screening studies determining fetal RhD status have been tested on Caucasian and Asian populations, but limited or no studies have been conducted on the Ethiopian population. In the current study, we carried non-invasive prenatal screening of fetal RHD genotype in selected RhD negative Ethiopian pregnant women.

METHODS

Cell-free DNA was extracted from the plasma samples of 117 RhD pregnant women between 9 and 38 weeks of gestation. Fetal RHD genotypes were detected by targeting exons 5, 7 and 10 of the RHD gene by using real-time PCR assay. RHD genotypic results were confirmed by neonatal cord blood serology.

RESULTS

Fetal RHD genotyping was conclusive in all 117 subjects. RHD genotype was correctly predicted in 115 of 117 cases, thus the test yielded 98.3% accuracy (95%CI: 97.3-99.1%). Among 115 cases, 105 were genotyped as RHD positive and 12 were genotyped as RHD negative. The sensitivity and specificity of the test were 99.1% (95% CI: 94.8-99.9%) and 91.7% (95%CI: 61.5-99.7%) respectively. The negative and positive predictive values were 99.9% (95%CI: 99.2-99.9%) and 54.0% (95% CI: 15.2-88.4%) respectively. SRY genotyping results were in complete concordance with fetal sex.

CONCLUSION

Multi exon targeted non-invasive prenatal screening test for fetal RhD determination exhibited high accuracy and sensitivity. A confirmatory study with a bigger size of study subjects is warranted before enabling clinical implementation.

Recommendation for validation and quality assurance of non-invasive prenatal testing for foetal blood groups and implications for IVD risk classification according to EU regulations

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Non-invasive assays for predicting foetal blood group status in pregnancy serve as valuable clinical tools in the management of pregnancies at risk of detrimental consequences due to blood group antigen incompatibility. To secure clinical applicability, assays for non-invasive prenatal testing of foetal blood groups need to follow strict rules for validation and quality assurance. Here, we present a multi-national position paper with specific recommendations for validation and quality assurance for such assays and discuss their risk classification according to EU regulations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the literature covering validation for in-vitro diagnostic (IVD) assays in general and for non-invasive foetal RHD genotyping in particular. Recommendations were based on the result of discussions between co-authors.

RESULTS

In relation to Annex VIII of the In-Vitro-Diagnostic Medical Device Regulation 2017/746 of the European Parliament and the Council, assays for non-invasive prenatal testing of foetal blood groups are risk class D devices. In our opinion, screening for targeted anti-D prophylaxis for non-immunized RhD negative women should be placed under risk class C. To ensure high quality of non-invasive foetal blood group assays within and beyond the European Union, we present specific recommendations for validation and quality assurance in terms of analytical detection limit, range and linearity, precision, robustness, pre-analytics and use of controls in routine testing. With respect to immunized women, different requirements for validation and IVD risk classification are discussed.

CONCLUSION

These recommendations should be followed to ensure appropriate assay performance and applicability for clinical use of both commercial and in-house assays.

Laboratory Monitoring of Mother, Fetus, and Newborn in Hemolytic Disease of Fetus and Newborn

Background

Laboratory monitoring of mother, fetus, and newborn in hemolytic disease of fetus and newborn (HDFN) aims to guide clinicians and the immunized women to focus on the most serious problems of alloimmunization and thus minimize the consequences of HDFN in general and of anti-D in particular. Here, we present the current approach of laboratory screening and testing for prevention and monitoring of HDFN at the Copenhagen University Hospital in Denmark.

Summary

All pregnant women are typed and screened in the 1st trimester. This serves to identify the RhD-negative pregnant women who at gestational age (GA) of 25 weeks are offered a second screen test and a non-invasive fetal RhD prediction. At GA 29 weeks, and again after delivery, non-immunized RhD-negative women carrying an RhD-positive fetus are offered Rh immunoglobulin. If the 1st trimester screen reveals an alloantibody, antenatal investigation is initiated. This also includes RhD-positive women with alloantibodies. Specificity and titer are determined, the fetal phenotype is predicted by non-invasive genotyping based on cell-free DNA (RhD, K, Rhc, RhC, RhE, ABO), and serial monitoring of titer commences. Based on titers and specificity, monitoring with serial peak systolic velocity measurements in the fetal middle cerebral artery to detect anemia will take place. Intrauterine transfusion is given when fetal anemia is suspected. Monitoring of the newborn by titer and survival of fetal red blood cells by flow cytometry will help predict the length of the recovery of the newborn.

Time points and risk factors for RhD immunizations after the implementation of targeted routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis: A retrospective nationwide cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Targeted routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis was introduced to the national prophylaxis program in Finland in late 2013. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence, time-points, and risk factors for Rhesus D immunization after the implementation of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis, in all women in Finland with antenatal anti-D antibodies detected in 2014-2017.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study, the incidence, time-points, and risk factors of anti-D immunizations were analyzed. Information on antenatal screening was obtained from the Finnish Red Cross Blood Service database, and obstetric data from hospital records and the Finnish Medical Birth Register.

RESULTS

The study included a total of 228 women (197 with complete data for all pregnancies). After the implementation of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis, the prevalence of pregnancies with anti-D antibodies decreased from 1.52% in 2014 to 0.88% in 2017, and the corresponding incidence of new immunizations decreased from 0.33% to 0.10%. Time-points for detection of new anti-D antibodies before and after 2014 were the first screening sample at 8-12 weeks of gestation in 52% versus 19%, the second sample at 24-26 weeks in 20% versus 50%, and the third screening at 36 weeks in 28% versus 32%.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of new anti-D immunizations decreased as expected after the implementation of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis. True failures are rare and they mainly occur when the prophylaxis is not given appropriately, suggesting a need for constant education of healthcare professionals on the subject.

Next-generation sequencing of 35 RHD variants in 16 253 serologically D- pregnant women in the Finnish population

Fetal RHD screening for targeted routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis has been implemented in many countries, including Finland, since the 2010s. Comprehensive knowledge of the RHD polymorphism in the population is essential for the performance and safety of the anti-D prophylaxis program. During the first 3 years of the national screening program in Finland, over 16 000 samples from RhD- women were screened for fetal RHD; among them, 79 samples (0.5%) containing a maternal variant allele were detected. Of the detected maternal variants, 35 cases remained inconclusive using the traditional genotyping methods and required further analysis by next-generation sequencing (NGS) of the whole RHD gene to uncover the variant allele. In addition to the 13 RHD variants that have been previously reported in different populations, 8 novel variants were also detected, indicating that there is more variation of RHD in the RhD- Finnish population than has been previously known. Three of the novel alleles were identified in multiple samples; thus, they are likely specific to the original Finnish population. National screening has thus provided new information about the diversity of RHD variants in the Finnish population. The results show that NGS is a powerful method for genotyping the highly polymorphic RHD gene compared with traditional methods that rely on the detection of specific nucleotides by polymerase chain reaction amplification.

Diagnostic performance of the noninvasive prenatal FetoGnost RhD assay for the prediction of the fetal RhD blood group status

Purpose

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a commercially available test kit for noninvasive prenatal determination of the fetal RhD status (NIPT-RhD) with a focus on early gestation and multiple pregnancies.

Methods

The FetoGnost RhD assay (Ingenetix, Vienna, Austria) is routinely applied for clinical decision making either in woman with anti-D alloimmunization or to target the application of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis (RAADP) to women with a RhD positive fetus. Based on existing data in the laboratory information system the newborn’s serological RhD status was compared with NIPT RhD results.

Results

Since 2009 NIPT RhD was performed in 2968 pregnant women between weeks 5 + 6 and 40 + 0 of gestation (median 12 + 6) and conclusive results were obtained in 2888 (97.30%) cases. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated from those 2244 (77.70%) cases with the newborn’s serological RhD status reported. The sensitivity of the FetoGnost RhD assay was 99.93% (95% CI 99.61–99.99%) and the specificity was 99.61% (95% CI 98.86–99.87%). No false-positive or false-negative NIPT RhD result was observed in 203 multiple pregnancies.

Conclusion

NIPT RhD results are reliable when obtained with FetoGnost RhD assay. Targeted routine anti-D-prophylaxis can start as early as 11 + 0 weeks of gestation in singleton and multiple pregnancies.

The Norwegian experience with nationwide implementation of fetal RHD genotyping and targeted routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis

OBJECTIVES

To reduce the risk of RhD alloimmunization during the last trimester of pregnancy, a targeted routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis (RAADP) programme was implemented in Norway in 2016. Here, we present and discuss our experience with the nationwide implementation of the programme, and report sample uptake and preliminary data of de novo anti-D in pregnancy.

BACKGROUND

The targeted RAADP was advised by the academic community and evaluated by the health authorities. A National Working Group has conducted the implementation in the transfusion services and contributed to organise the administration of the antenatal anti-D prophylaxis. Fetal RhD type is determined by non-invasive prenatal testing at gestational week 24, and anti-D prophylaxis is administrated at gestational week 28 only to women with RhD positive fetuses.

METHODS

We describe the implementation process of targeted RAADP in Norway. The sample uptake is calculated by comparing the number of fetal RHD screens with the expected number of samples.

RESULTS

The sample uptake shows regional variations: 88%-100% after 3 years. Promising decrease in de novo anti-D detected during pregnancy is observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Nationwide targeted RAADP is implemented and included in the Norwegian maternity care programme. Compliance to sample uptake should further improve in some regions. A remaining issue to fulfil is the documentation of the accuracy of the fetal RHD-typing at all sites. Post-natal prophylaxis will then be guided by the fetal RHD result. Dedicated registries will ensure data to evaluate the expected reduction in pregnancy-related RhD immunisations, which is the final success criterion of the programme.

Prenatal RHD genotyping in Croatia: preliminary results

OBJECTIVES

Croatian Institute of Transfusion Medicine (CITM) implemented non-invasive fetal RHD genotyping as a request for targeted antenatal anti-D prophylaxis. The diagnostic performance of in-house RT-PCR method for fetal RHD genotyping and preliminary results are analyzed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Evaluation included results of RHD genotyping for 205 RhD negative pregnant women, 12-36th week of gestation, whose samples were received in period between 2015 and 2020. QIAsymphony SP DSP Virus Midi Kit was used for cffDNA extraction on QIAsymphony SP platform (Qiagen, Germany). Fragments of RHD exons 7 and 10 and later exon 5 were RT-PCR amplified. As internal controls, amplification of SRY gene or RASSF1A fragment and β-actin genes digested with BsTUI were used.

RESULTS

We identified 70.72% (145/205) positive and 28.78% (59/205) negative fetal RHD genotypes. We had one inconclusive result (0.50%) due to the interference of maternal DNA with variant genotype RHD*09.02.00/01/*01N.01. When compared to newborns RhD phenotypes, no false negative and three false positive results (3/199, 1.50%) were observed. The test yielded 100% sensitivity and 95.08% specificity, while diagnostic accuracy was 98.48%. We were able to determine one case of fetal variant genotype RHD*04.04/*01N.01 inherited from the father. The negative and positive predictive test values were 100% and 97.86%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Automated cffDNA extraction and RT-PCR amplification of fetal RHD exons 5,7,10 and fragments of SRY, RASSF1A genes represents highly reliable system for determining fetal RHD status which enables targeted antenatal anti-D prophylaxis. To obtain high specificity of cffDNA extraction, strict and thoroughly cleaning procedures are required.

RhIg for the prevention Rh immunization and IVIg for the treatment of affected neonates

Rhesus D (RhD) negative pregnant women carrying an RhD positive fetus are at risk of developing anti-D during or after pregnancy. Anti-d-immunoglobulin (RhIg), which is mainly produced from special plasma donated in a few countries for the whole world, is able to prevent an anti-D alloimmunization. Through the introduction of ante- and postnatal anti-d-prophylaxis into clinical routine, the frequency of hemolytic disease of fetus and newborn decreased considerably. Postnatal prophylaxis from the beginning in the 1960s has been applied only to women who delivered an RhD positive newborn. Because the fetal RhD status can be determined with high sensitivity and accuracy from the mother's peripheral blood, targeted antenatal anti-d-prophylaxis is becoming a new standard procedure in more and more countries. Phototherapy and exchange transfusion are still the main pillars for the treatment of RhD hemolytic disease of the newborn. The efficacy of IVIg in the management of these neonates is not conclusive and cannot be recommended until a larger randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study is performed.

Antenatal and postpartum prevention of Rh alloimmunization: A systematic review and GRADE analysis

BACKGROUND

Existing systematic reviews of Rh immunoprophylaxis include only data from randomized controlled trials, have dated searches, and some do not report on all domains of risk of bias or evaluate the certainty of the evidence. Our objective was to perform an updated review, by including new trials, any comparative observational studies, and assessing the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE framework.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library from 2000 to November 26, 2019. Relevant websites and bibliographies of systematic reviews and guidelines were searched for studies published before 2000. Outcomes of interest were sensitization and adverse events. Risk of bias was evaluated with the Cochrane tool and ROBINS-I. The certainty of the evidence was performed using the GRADE framework.

RESULTS

Thirteen randomized trials and eight comparative cohort studies were identified, evaluating 12 comparisons. Although there is some evidence of beneficial treatment effects (e.g., at 6-months postpartum, fewer women who received RhIg at delivery compared to no RhIg became sensitized [70 fewer sensitized women per 1,000 (95%CI: 67 to 71 fewer); I2 = 73%]), due to very low certainty of the evidence, the magnitude of the treatment effect may be overestimated. The certainty of the evidence was very low for most outcomes often due to high risk of bias (e.g., randomization method, allocation concealment, selective reporting) and imprecision (i.e., few events and small sample sizes). There is limited evidence on prophylaxis for invasive fetal procedures (e.g. amniocentesis) in the comparative literature, and few studies reported adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Serious risk of bias and low to very low certainty of the evidence is found in existing RCTs and comparative observational studies addressing optimal effectiveness of Rh immunoprophylaxis. Guideline development committees should exercise caution when assessing the strength of the recommendations that inform and influence clinical practice in this area.

Two Reliable Methodical Approaches for Non-Invasive RHD Genotyping of a Fetus from Maternal Plasma

Noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping is an important tool for predicting RhD incompatibility between a pregnant woman and a fetus. This study aimed to assess a methodological approach other than the commonly used one for noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping on a representative set of RhD-negative pregnant women. The methodology must be accurate, reliable, and broadly available for implementation into routine clinical practice. A total of 337 RhD-negative pregnant women from the Czech Republic region were tested in this study. The fetal RHD genotype was assessed using two methods: real-time PCR and endpoint quantitative fluorescent (QF) PCR. We used exon-7-specific primers from the RHD gene, along with internal controls. Plasma samples were analyzed and measured in four/two parallel reactions to determine the accuracy of the RHD genotyping. The RHD genotype was verified using DNA analysis from a newborn buccal swab. Both methods showed an excellent ability to predict the RHD genotype. Real-time PCR achieved its greatest accuracy of 98.6% (97.1% sensitivity and 100% specificity (95% CI)) if all four PCRs were positive/negative. The QF PCR method also achieved its greatest accuracy of 99.4% (100% sensitivity and 98.6% specificity (95% CI)) if all the measurements were positive/negative. Both real-time PCR and QF PCR were reliable methods for precisely assessing the fetal RHD allele from the plasma of RhD-negative pregnant women.

Targeted antenatal anti-D prophylaxis for RhD-negative pregnant women: a systematic review

Background

All non-sensitized Rhesus D (RhD)-negative pregnant women in Germany receive antenatal anti-D prophylaxis without knowledge of fetal RhD status. Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) of cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma could avoid unnecessary anti-D administration. In this paper, we systematically reviewed the evidence on the benefit of NIPT for fetal RhD status in RhD-negative pregnant women.

Methods

We systematically searched several bibliographic databases, trial registries, and other sources (up to October 2019) for controlled intervention studies investigating NIPT for fetal RhD versus conventional anti-D prophylaxis. The focus was on the impact on fetal and maternal morbidity. We primarily considered direct evidence (from randomized controlled trials) or if unavailable, linked evidence (from diagnostic accuracy studies and from controlled intervention studies investigating the administration or withholding of anti-D prophylaxis). The results of diagnostic accuracy studies were pooled in bivariate meta-analyses.

Results

Neither direct evidence nor sufficient data for linked evidence were identified. Meta-analysis of data from about 60,000 participants showed high sensitivity (99.9%; 95% CI [99.5%; 100%] and specificity (99.2%; 95% CI [98.5%; 99.5%]).

Conclusions

NIPT for fetal RhD status is equivalent to conventional serologic testing using the newborn’s blood. Studies investigating patient-relevant outcomes are still lacking.

Rhesus D factor (RhD) negative women's experiences with pregnancy: An interpretive description

BACKGROUND

The development of rh immune globulin (RhIG) for the prevention of Rhesus D (RhD) alloimmunization has significantly decreased the incidence of RhD alloimmunization. Despite long-standing prevention, the experiences of RhD negative women with pregnancy is absent in the literature.

AIM

The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of RhD negative women with pregnancy.

METHODS

Utilizing an Interpretive Description approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with RhD negative women about their pregnancies. This study took place within the geographic context of northern British Columbia (BC). The analysis involved a two-cycle approach to identify themes within the data.

FINDINGS

Sixteen RhD negative women that live in northern BC participated in this study. The analysis identified that RhD negative women are uninformed and want to be involved in the decision-making process regarding the prevention of RhD alloimmunization. The themes that emerged from the interview data were communication, information-seeking behaviour, out of sight out of mind, choice and trust, and patient advocacy.

DISCUSSION

The participants in this study described lacking information regarding the prevention of RhD alloimmunization. They sought information to overcome the gaps in knowledge and a desire to be involved in the decision-making process.

CONCLUSION

RhD negative women want information and to be involved in the decision-making process in the prevention of RhD alloimmunization. Working with RhD negative women to develop decision-aids and/or other educational tools to aid in the decision-making process are warranted.

Introduction of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Blood Group and Platelet Antigens from Cell-Free Plasma DNA Using Digital PCR

Background

Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for fetal antigens is a common standard for targeted immune prophylaxis in RhD-mediated hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn, and is most frequently done by quantitative PCR (qPCR). A similar approach is considered for other blood group and human platelet alloantigens (HPA). Because of a higher sensitivity compared to qPCR for rare molecule detection, we established and validated digital PCR (dPCR) assays for the detection of RHD exons 3, 5 and 7, KEL1, HPA-1a, and HPA-5b from cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in plasma. The dPCR assays for the Y-chromosomal marker amelogenin and autosomal SNPs were implemented as controls for the proof of fetal DNA.

Methods

Validation was performed on dilution series of mixed plasma samples from volunteer donors with known genotypes. After preamplification of the target loci, two-color (FAM and VIC) TaqMan^TM probe chemistry and chip-based dPCR were applied. The assays for RHD included GAPDH as an internal control. For the diallelic markers KEL1/2, HPA-1a/b, HPA-5a/b, and AMEL-X/Y and 3 autosomal SNPs, the probes enabled allelic discrimination in the two fluorescence channels. The dPCR protocol for NIPT was applied to plasma samples from pregnant women.

Results

The RHD exon 5 assay allowed the detection of a 0.05% RHD target in an RhD-negative background, whereas the exon 7 assay required at least a 0.25% target. The exon 3 assay showed the highest background and required at least a 2.5% RHD target for reliable detection. The dPCR assays for the diallelic markers revealed similar sensitivity and enabled the detection of at least a 0.5% target allele. The HPA-1a assay was the most sensitive and allowed target detection in plasma mixtures containing only 0.05% HPA-1a. The plasma samples from 13 pregnant women at different gestational ages showed unambiguous positive and negative results for the analyzed targets.

Conclusion

Analysis of cfDNA from maternal plasma using dPCR is suitable for the detection of fetal alleles. Because of the high sensitivity of the assays, the NIPT protocol for RhD, KEL1, and HPA can also be applied to earlier stages of pregnancy.

Single dose v two-dose antenatal anti-D prophylaxis: a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare rates of detectability of circulating Rh(D)-immunoglobulin (anti-D) at delivery with single and two-dose antenatal anti-D prophylaxis (RAADP) regimens; to compare compliance with the two regimens.

DESIGN

Open label, randomised controlled trial between May 2013 and November 2015.

SETTING, PARTICIPANTS

277 women who attended a tertiary obstetric referral hospital in Perth for antenatal care and were at least 18 years of age, less than 30 weeks pregnant and yet to receive RAADP, Rh(D)-negative (negative antibody screen), and who intended to deliver their baby at the hospital. Exclusion criteria were prior anti-D sensitisation, any contraindication of anti-D administration, and a history of isolated IgA deficiency.

INTERVENTIONS

One 1500 IU anti-D dose at 28 weeks of pregnancy (single dose regimen); two doses of 625 IU each at 28 and 34 weeks of pregnancy (two-dose regimen).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the proportion of women with detectable anti-D levels at delivery; the secondary outcome was compliance with the allocated RAADP regimen.

RESULTS

Circulating anti-D was detectable at delivery in a greater proportion of women in the two-dose group (111 of 129, 86%) than in the single dose group (70 of 125, 56%; P < 0.001). Compliance was not significantly different between the single dose (86 of 138, 61%) and two-dose groups (70 of 139, 50%; P = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

The two-dose RAADP schedule currently recommended in Australia provides better protection against Rh(D) sensitisation than a one-dose regimen.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12613000661774).

Noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping to guide targeted anti-D prophylaxis-an external quality assessment workshop

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Fetal RHD genotyping of cell-free fetal DNA from RhD-negative pregnant women can be used to guide targeted antenatal and postnatal anti-D prophylaxis for the prevention of RhD immunization. To assure the quality of clinical testing, we conducted an external quality assessment workshop with the participation of 28 laboratories.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Aliquots of pooled maternal plasma were sent to each laboratory. One sample was positive, and the second sample was negative for fetal RHD, verified by pre-workshop testing using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) analysis of RHD exons 4, 5, 7 and 10. Plasma samples were shipped at room temperature. A reporting scheme was supplied for data collection, including questions regarding the methodological setup, results and clinical recommendations. Different methodological approaches were used, all employing qPCR with a total of eight different combinations of RHD exon targets. The samples were tested blindly.

RESULTS

Fetal RHD genotyping was performed with no false-negative and no false-positive results. One inconclusive result was reported for the RHD-positive sample, and four inconclusive results were reported for the RHD-negative sample. All clinical conclusions were satisfactory.

CONCLUSION

This external quality assessment workshop demonstrates that despite the different approaches taken to perform the clinical assays, fetal RHD genotyping is a reliable laboratory assay to guide targeted use of Rh prophylaxis in a clinical setting.

Developments beyond blood group serology in the genomics era

Blood group serology and single nucleotide polymorphism-based genotyping platforms are accurate but do not provide a comprehensive cover for all 36 blood group systems and do not cover the antigen diversity observed among population groups. This review examines the extent to which genomics is shaping blood group serology. Resources for genomics include the Human Reference Genome Sequence assembly; curated blood group tables listing variants; public databases providing information on genetic variants from world-wide studies; and massively parallel sequencing technologies. Blood group genomic studies span the spectrum, from bioinformatic data mining of huge data sets containing whole genome and whole exome information to laboratory investigations utilising targeted sequencing approaches. Blood group predictions based on genome sequencing and genomic studies are proving accurate, and have shown utility in both research and reference settings. Overall, studies confirm the potential for blood group genomics to reshape donor and patient transfusion management strategies to provide more compatible blood transfusions.

Cell free fetal DNA to triage antenatal rhesus immune globulin: Is it really cost-effective in the United States?

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and costs of three different strategies of antenatal rhesus immune globulin (RhIG) administration in a US population.

METHODS

A decision tree analysis was undertaken for universal antenatal RhIG administration based on RhD serologic paternity testing, universal administration without paternity, and selective antenatal RhIG administration using cell free fetal DNA (cfDNA) for RHD fetal typing. Rates of alloimmunization were calculated. Charges were determined for laboratory testing and obstetrical and neonatal treatments for the first pregnancy and cases of alloimmunization in the following pregnancy.

RESULTS

The largest number of new RhD alloimmunization cases resulted from a strategy of universal RhIG that included paternity. Fewer cases resulted from a selective strategy; the least number of cases were associated with a universal approach that discounted paternity. When the costs of first pregnancies and alloimmunized second pregnancies were combined, a universal strategy that excludes paternity had the least costs followed by a selective strategy followed by a universal strategy that included paternity.

CONCLUSION

The use of cfDNA to determine the selective use of antenatal RhIG would not be cost-effective in the United States. Universal antenatal RhIG without paternity is more effective in preventing new cases of alloimmunization than the current ACOG guideline.

Usefulness of Non-Invasive Fetal RHD Genotyping towards Immunoprophylaxis Optimization

Introduction: Since anti-D immunoprophylaxis given to D-negative pregnant women is a blood product, blood donations have an impact on the availability of prophylactic doses. The Pan American Health Organization reported, in June 2017, that less than half of blood donors are volunteers in Latin America and the Caribbean. In these countries, guidelines for use of anti-D prophylaxis are still controversial. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the convenience of a simple and cost-effectivene non-invasive prenatal diagnostic assay for anti-D prophylaxis optimization in multiethnic populations. Methods: Cell-free fetal DNA from plasma samples of D-negative pregnant women were analyzed by real-time PCR for simultaneous amplification of sequences of exons 5 and 10 of the RHD gene. Fetal RHD genotype was determined in 111 pregnant women. Neonates' phenotype was determined 72 h after birth. Results: Genotyping predicted fetal phenotype with 100% accuracy. Prenatal diagnosis showed 78% RHD-positive and 22% RHD-negative neonates. Conclusion: We demonstrated that, beyond the large genetic variation of the Rh system and the numerous D variants present in multiethnic groups, non-invasive fetal RHD genotyping using two sequences of the gene can be enough for clinical application in an admixed population. This robust technique of simple implementation allows to determine fetal RHD in maternal blood with high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. The introduction of fetal RhD genotyping as part of an antenatal screening program constitutes a reliable manner to optimize anti-D prophylaxis; however, it has not been implemented so far in most American countries.

Anti-D quantification in relation to anti-D titre, middle cerebral artery Doppler measurement and clinical outcome in RhD-immunized pregnancies

BACKGROUND

The optimal strategy to monitor RhD-immunized pregnancies is not evident. Whether a quantitative analysis of anti-D antibodies adds valuable information to anti-D titre is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relevance of anti-D quantification in routine monitoring of RhD-immunized pregnancies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a retrospective study, 64 consecutive pregnancies in 61 immunized women with anti-D titre ≥128 at any time during pregnancy were included. According to routine, at titre ≥128, anti-D quantification was performed by flow cytometry and the peak systolic velocity in the middle cerebral artery was measured by ultrasound. Decisions for treatment with intrauterine blood transfusion were based on increased peak systolic velocity in the middle cerebral artery.

RESULTS

Increasing anti-D concentrations correlated well to increasing anti-D titres, but at each titre value, there was a large interindividual variation, in the determined anti-D concentration. Intrauterine transfusions were initiated in 35 pregnancies according to algorithms based on ultrasound measurements, at anti-D concentrations of 2·4-619 IU/ml and titre 128-16 000. Sixty pregnancies resulted in a live-born child, three in miscarriage and one in termination of pregnancy. During the perinatal care in the neonatal intensive care unit, thirty-one of the neonates were treated with blood exchange transfusions and/or red cell transfusions and 47 were treated with phototherapy.

CONCLUSION

Anti-D quantification does not add further information compared to anti-D titre, in defining a critical level to start monitoring RhD-immunized pregnancies with Doppler ultrasound.

Red Blood Cell Alloimmunization in the Pregnant Patient

Alloimmunization to red blood cell (RBC) antigens represents a challenge for physicians caring for women of child bearing potential. Exposure to non-self RBC antigens may occur during transfusion or pregnancy leading to the development of antibodies. If a subsequent fetus bears that antigen, maternal antibodies may attack the fetal red blood cells causing red cell destruction and clinically significant hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). In the most severe cases, HDFN may result in intrauterine fetal demise due to high output cardiac failure, effusions and ascites, known as "hydrops fetalis". This article reviews strategies for management and prevention of RBC alloimmunization in women of child bearing potential.