1
|
Teng X, Liu M, Wang Z, Dong X. Machine learning prediction of preterm birth in women under 35 using routine biomarkers in a retrospective cohort study. Sci Rep 2025; 15:10213. [PMID: 40133418 PMCID: PMC11937320 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-92814-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/03/2025] [Indexed: 03/27/2025] Open
Abstract
Preterm birth (PTB), defined as delivery before 37 weeks, affects 15 million infants annually, accounting for 11% of live births and over 35% of neonatal deaths. While advanced maternal age (≥ 35 years) is a known risk factor, PTB risk in women under 35 is underexplored. This study aimed to develop a machine learning-based model for PTB prediction in women under 35. A retrospective cohort of 2606 cases (2019-2022) equally split between full-term and preterm births was analyzed. Logistic Regression, LightGBM, Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), and XGBoost models were evaluated. External validation was conducted using 803 independent cases (2023). Model performance was assessed using area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values were used to interpret model predictions. The XGBoost model demonstrated superior performance with an AUC of 0.893 (95% CI: 0.860-0.925) on the validation set. In comparison, Logistic Regression, LightGBM, and GBDT achieved AUCs of 0.872, 0.840, and 0.879, respectively. External validation of the XGBoost model yielded an AUC of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.889-0.931). SHAP analysis highlighted seven key predictors: alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), hemoglobin (HGB), urea (UREA), lymphocyte count (Lym1), sodium (Na), and red cell distribution width coefficient of variation (RDWCV). The XGBoost model provides accurate PTB risk prediction and key insights for early intervention in women under 35, supporting its potential clinical utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaojing Teng
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Mengting Liu
- The Fourth School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Hangzhou First People's Hospital), Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhiyi Wang
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Hangzhou Women's Hospital (Hangzhou Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Hangzhou Women's Hospital, No. 369, Kunpeng Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, 310008, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Xueyan Dong
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, No. 261, Huansha Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, 31000, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moons KGM, Damen JAA, Kaul T, Hooft L, Andaur Navarro C, Dhiman P, Beam AL, Van Calster B, Celi LA, Denaxas S, Denniston AK, Ghassemi M, Heinze G, Kengne AP, Maier-Hein L, Liu X, Logullo P, McCradden MD, Liu N, Oakden-Rayner L, Singh K, Ting DS, Wynants L, Yang B, Reitsma JB, Riley RD, Collins GS, van Smeden M. PROBAST+AI: an updated quality, risk of bias, and applicability assessment tool for prediction models using regression or artificial intelligence methods. BMJ 2025; 388:e082505. [PMID: 40127903 PMCID: PMC11931409 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2024-082505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/16/2025] [Indexed: 03/26/2025]
Affiliation(s)
- Karel G M Moons
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Johanna A A Damen
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
- Cochrane Netherlands, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Tabea Kaul
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Lotty Hooft
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
- Cochrane Netherlands, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Constanza Andaur Navarro
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Paula Dhiman
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, UK EQUATOR Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Andrew L Beam
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ben Van Calster
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Unit for Health Technology Assessment Research (LUHTAR), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Leo Anthony Celi
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Laboratory for Computational Physiology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Spiros Denaxas
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
- British Heart Foundation Data Science Centre, Health Data Research Centre UK, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Marzyeh Ghassemi
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Georg Heinze
- Institute of Clinical Biometrics, Centre for Medical Data Science, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Lena Maier-Hein
- Division of Intelligent Medical Systems, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Centre for Tumour Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Xiaoxuan Liu
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- School of Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, Birmingham, UK
| | - Patricia Logullo
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, UK EQUATOR Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Melissa D McCradden
- Department of Bioethics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nan Liu
- Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Lauren Oakden-Rayner
- Australian Institute for Machine Learning, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Karandeep Singh
- Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Daniel S Ting
- Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- AI Office, Singapore Health Service, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Laure Wynants
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Epidemiology, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Bada Yang
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
- Cochrane Netherlands, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Johannes B Reitsma
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Richard D Riley
- School of Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, Birmingham, UK
| | - Gary S Collins
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, UK EQUATOR Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Maarten van Smeden
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kloska A, Harmoza A, Kloska SM, Marciniak T, Sadowska-Krawczenko I. Predicting preterm birth using machine learning methods. Sci Rep 2025; 15:5683. [PMID: 39956843 PMCID: PMC11830770 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-89905-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/10/2025] [Indexed: 02/18/2025] Open
Abstract
Preterm birth is a significant public health concern, given its correlation with neonatal mortality and morbidity. The aetiology of preterm birth is complex and multifactorial. The objective of this study was to develop and compare machine learning models for predicting the risk of preterm birth. Data were collected from 50 patients in a maternity ward, with an analysis performed based on the timing of delivery (preterm vs. term). The applicability of XGBoost, CatBoost, logistic regression, support vector machines (SVM), and decision trees for predicting preterm delivery was evaluated through training. The linear SVM with boosted parameters demonstrated the highest performance, achieving an accuracy of 82%, precision of 83%, recall of 86%, and an F1-score of 84%. The logistic regression model, also boosted, demonstrated comparable performance to the linear SVM, with similar accuracy (80%), precision (82%), recall (82%), and F1-score (82%). The performance of other models, including decision trees and more complex algorithms, was inferior, which is likely attributable to the limited dataset and the number of parameters involved. In particular, machine learning models, most notably the linear SVM, can be effectively employed to assess the risk of preterm birth. The findings indicate that the linear SVM model exhibits the greatest efficacy among the tested models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Kloska
- Faculty of Medicine, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, 85796, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
| | - Alicja Harmoza
- Faculty of Medicine, The Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum, 85067, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Sylwester M Kloska
- Faculty of Medicine, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, 85796, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Tomasz Marciniak
- Faculty of Telecommunications, Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, 85796, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Al Ghadban Y, Du Y, Charnock-Jones DS, Garmire LX, Smith GCS, Sovio U. Prediction of spontaneous preterm birth using supervised machine learning on metabolomic data: A case-cohort study. BJOG 2024; 131:908-916. [PMID: 37984426 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Revised: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify and internally validate metabolites predictive of spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) using multiple machine learning methods and sequential maternal serum samples, and to predict spontaneous early term birth (sETB) using these metabolites. DESIGN Case-cohort design within a prospective cohort study. SETTING Cambridge, UK. POPULATION OR SAMPLE A total of 399 Pregnancy Outcome Prediction study participants, including 98 cases of sPTB. METHODS An untargeted metabolomic analysis of maternal serum samples at 12, 20, 28 and 36 weeks of gestation was performed. We applied six supervised machine learning methods and a weighted Cox model to measurements at 28 weeks of gestation and sPTB, followed by feature selection. We used logistic regression with elastic net penalty, followed by best subset selection, to reduce the number of predictive metabolites further. We applied coefficients from the chosen models to measurements from different gestational ages to predict sPTB and sETB. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES sPTB and sETB. RESULTS We identified 47 metabolites, mostly lipids, as important predictors of sPTB by two or more methods and 22 were identified by three or more methods. The best 4-predictor model had an optimism-corrected area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.703 at 28 weeks of gestation. The model also predicted sPTB in 12-week samples (0.606, 95% CI 0.544-0.667) and 20-week samples (0.657, 95% CI 0.597-0.717) and it predicted sETB in 36-week samples (0.727, 95% CI 0.606-0.849). A lysolipid, 1-palmitoleoyl-GPE (16:1)*, was the strongest predictor of sPTB at 12 weeks of gestation (0.609, 95% CI 0.548-0.670), 20 weeks (0.630, 95% CI 0.569-0.690) and 28 weeks (0.660, 95% CI 0.599-0.722), and of sETB at 36 weeks (0.739, 95% CI 0.618-0.860). CONCLUSIONS We identified and internally validated maternal serum metabolites predictive of sPTB. A lysolipid, 1-palmitoleoyl-GPE (16:1)*, is a novel predictor of sPTB and sETB. Further validation in external populations is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasmina Al Ghadban
- Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Yuheng Du
- Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - D Stephen Charnock-Jones
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
- Centre for Trophoblast Research (CTR), Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Lana X Garmire
- Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Gordon C S Smith
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
- Centre for Trophoblast Research (CTR), Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ulla Sovio
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
- Centre for Trophoblast Research (CTR), Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Li J, Yang S, Zou L, Liu X, Deng D, Huang R, Hua L, Wu Q. Cervical elastography: finding a novel predictor for improving the prediction of preterm birth in uncomplicated twin pregnancies. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2024; 309:2401-2410. [PMID: 37368143 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-023-07105-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study set out to investigate a novel ultrasound parameter using cervical elastosonography for improving the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) in twin pregnancies. STUDY DESIGN The study was comprised of 106 twin pregnancies from October 2020 to January 2022 in Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital. They were divided into two groups according to gestational age (GA) at delivery (delivery < 35 weeks and delivery ≥ 35 weeks). There were five elastographic parameters: Elasticity Contrast Index (ECI), Cervical Hardness Ratio (CHR), Closed Internal cervical ostium Strain rate (CIS); External cervical ostium strain rate (ES), CIS/ES ratio and Cervical Length (CL). All of the clinical and ultrasonic indicators with P < 0.1 were considered candidate indicators via univariate logistic regression. Based on the extracted unified combination of clinical indicators, the combinations of permutation with the candidate ultrasound indicators were performed step by step in multivariable logistic regression. The best ultrasound indicator with the lowest Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and the highest Areas Under the receiver operating characteristic Curve (AUC) was chosen for establishing the prediction score. RESULTS Over 30% (36/106) of those who delivered before 35 weeks gestation. There were distinct differences in the clinical characteristics and cervical elastography parameters between the two groups. Seven major clinical variables were identified as a unified clinical indicator. CISmin as the best ultrasound elastography predictor indicated the lowest AIC and the highest AUC and outperformed alternative indicators significantly in the prediction of delivery before 35 weeks of gestation. Unfortunately, CLmin which was commonly used in clinical practice ranked far from all of the cervical elastography parameters and presented the highest AIC and the lowest AUC. A preliminary scoring rule was established and the ability to predict the risk of sPTB in twin pregnancies was improved (Accuracy: 0.896 vs 0.877; AIC: 81.494 vs 91.698; AUC: 0.923 vs 0.906). CONCLUSIONS The cervical elastosonography predictor such as CISmin might be a more useful indicator applied for enhancing the ability in predicting twin pregnancies preterm birth than CL. Furthermore, there would be more benefits for advancing clinical decision-making in actual clinical practice by using cervical elastosonography in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinghua Li
- Department of Ultrasound, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, 100026, China
| | - Shufa Yang
- Department of Prenatal Diagnostic Center, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, 100026, China
| | - Liying Zou
- Department of Obstetrics, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University. Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, 100026, China
| | - Xiaowei Liu
- Department of Obstetrics, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University. Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, 100026, China
| | - Di Deng
- Department of Ultrasound, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, 100026, China
| | - Ruizhen Huang
- Department of Ultrasound, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, 100026, China
| | - Lin Hua
- Capital Medical University of Biomedical Engineering, Beijing, 100069, China.
| | - Qingqing Wu
- Department of Ultrasound, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, 100026, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Egorov V, Rosen T, Hill J, Khandelwal M, Kurtenoks V, Francy B, Sarvazyan N. Evaluating the Efficacy of Cervical Tactile Ultrasound Technique as a Predictive Tool for Spontaneous Preterm Birth. OPEN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 2024; 14:832-846. [PMID: 38845755 PMCID: PMC11155442 DOI: 10.4236/ojog.2024.145067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2024]
Abstract
Background Premature cervical softening and shortening may be considered an early mechanical failure that predispose to preterm birth. Purpose This study aims to explore the applicability of an innovative cervical tactile ultrasound approach for predicting spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB). Materials and Methods Eligible participants were women with low-risk singleton pregnancies in their second trimester, enrolled in this prospective observational study. A Cervix Monitor (CM) device was designed with a vaginal probe comprising four tactile sensors and a single ultrasound transducer operating at 5 MHz. The probe enabled the application of controllable pressure to the external cervical surface, facilitating the acquisition of stress-strain data from both anterior and posterior cervical sectors. Gestational age at delivery was recorded and compared against cervical elasticity. Results CM examination data were analyzed for 127 women at 240/7 - 286/7 gestational weeks. sPTB was observed in 6.3% of the cases. The preterm group exhibited a lower average cervical stress-to-strain ratio (elasticity) of 0.70 ± 0.26 kPa/mm compared to the term group's 1.63 ± 0.65 kPa/mm with a p-value of 1.1 × 10-4. Diagnostic accuracy for predicting spontaneous preterm birth based solely on cervical elasticity data was found to be 95.0% (95% CI, 88.5 - 100.0). Conclusion These findings suggest that measuring cervical elasticity with the designed tactile ultrasound probe has the potential to predict spontaneous preterm birth in a cost-effective manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Todd Rosen
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Jennifer Hill
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Meena Khandelwal
- Department of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Collins GS, Moons KGM, Dhiman P, Riley RD, Beam AL, Van Calster B, Ghassemi M, Liu X, Reitsma JB, van Smeden M, Boulesteix AL, Camaradou JC, Celi LA, Denaxas S, Denniston AK, Glocker B, Golub RM, Harvey H, Heinze G, Hoffman MM, Kengne AP, Lam E, Lee N, Loder EW, Maier-Hein L, Mateen BA, McCradden MD, Oakden-Rayner L, Ordish J, Parnell R, Rose S, Singh K, Wynants L, Logullo P. TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods. BMJ 2024; 385:e078378. [PMID: 38626948 PMCID: PMC11019967 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2023-078378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 260] [Impact Index Per Article: 260.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Gary S Collins
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, UK EQUATOR Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK
| | - Karel G M Moons
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Paula Dhiman
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, UK EQUATOR Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK
| | - Richard D Riley
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, Birmingham, UK
| | - Andrew L Beam
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ben Van Calster
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Marzyeh Ghassemi
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Xiaoxuan Liu
- Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Johannes B Reitsma
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Maarten van Smeden
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Anne-Laure Boulesteix
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich and Munich Centre of Machine Learning, Germany
| | - Jennifer Catherine Camaradou
- Patient representative, Health Data Research UK patient and public involvement and engagement group
- Patient representative, University of East Anglia, Faculty of Health Sciences, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK
| | - Leo Anthony Celi
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Laboratory for Computational Physiology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Spiros Denaxas
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
- British Heart Foundation Data Science Centre, London, UK
| | - Alastair K Denniston
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ben Glocker
- Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Robert M Golub
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Georg Heinze
- Section for Clinical Biometrics, Centre for Medical Data Science, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael M Hoffman
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Vector Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Emily Lam
- Patient representative, Health Data Research UK patient and public involvement and engagement group
| | - Naomi Lee
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, UK
| | - Elizabeth W Loder
- The BMJ, London, UK
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lena Maier-Hein
- Department of Intelligent Medical Systems, German Cancer Research Centre, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bilal A Mateen
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
- Wellcome Trust, London, UK
- Alan Turing Institute, London, UK
| | - Melissa D McCradden
- Department of Bioethics, Hospital for Sick Children Toronto, ON, Canada
- Genetics and Genome Biology, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lauren Oakden-Rayner
- Australian Institute for Machine Learning, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Johan Ordish
- Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, London, UK
| | - Richard Parnell
- Patient representative, Health Data Research UK patient and public involvement and engagement group
| | - Sherri Rose
- Department of Health Policy and Center for Health Policy, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Karandeep Singh
- Department of Epidemiology, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Laure Wynants
- Department of Epidemiology, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Patricia Logullo
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, UK EQUATOR Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Watanabe K. Current status of the position on labor progress prediction for contemporary pregnant women using Friedman curves: An updated review. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2024; 50:313-321. [PMID: 38037733 DOI: 10.1111/jog.15842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
AIM Prediction of labor progression is important for maternal and fetal health, as improved accuracy can lead to more timely intervention and improved outcomes. This review aims to outline the importance of predicting the progression of spontaneous parturition, detail the various methods employed to enhance this prediction and provide recommendations for future research. METHODS We searched articles relating to labor progression and systematic review articles on Artificial Inteligence (AI) in childbirth management using PubMed. To supplement, Google Scholar was used to find recent guidelines and related documents. RESULTS Traditional methods like vaginal examinations, criticized for subjectivity and inaccuracy, are gradually being replaced by ultrasound, considered a more objective and accurate approach. Further advancements have been observed with machine learning and artificial intelligence techniques, which promise to surpass the accuracies of conventional methods. The Friedman curve, developed in 1954, is the standard for assessing labor progress, but its application to Asian women, in particular, remains controversial, and various studies have reported that the actual rate of labor was slower than that indicated by the Friedman curve. CONCLUSION There is a need to innovate methodologies for predicting delivery tailored to modern pregnant women, especially when they have different genetic and cultural backgrounds than their Western counterparts, such as Asians. Future research should develop predictive models of labor progression that aim to enhance medical intervention and improve the safety and well-being of both mother and child.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaori Watanabe
- National Center for Global Health and Medicine, National College of Nursing, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhang Y, Du S, Hu T, Xu S, Lu H, Xu C, Li J, Zhu X. Establishment of a model for predicting preterm birth based on the machine learning algorithm. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023; 23:779. [PMID: 37950186 PMCID: PMC10636958 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-06058-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to construct a preterm birth prediction model based on electronic health records and to provide a reference for preterm birth prediction in the future. METHODS This was a cross-sectional design. The risk factors for the outcomes of preterm birth were assessed by multifactor logistic regression analysis. In this study, a logical regression model, decision tree, Naive Bayes, support vector machine, and AdaBoost are used to construct the prediction model. Accuracy, recall, precision, F1 value, and receiver operating characteristic curve, were used to evaluate the prediction performance of the model, and the clinical application of the model was verified. RESULTS A total of 5411 participants were included and were used for model construction. AdaBoost model has the best prediction ability among the five models. The accuracy of the model for the prediction of "non-preterm birth" was the highest, reaching 100%, and that of "preterm birth" was 72.73%. CONCLUSIONS By constructing a preterm birth prediction model based on electronic health records, we believe that machine algorithms have great potential for preterm birth identification. However, more relevant studies are needed before its application in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yao Zhang
- School of Nursing, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Sisi Du
- School of Nursing, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Tingting Hu
- School of Nursing, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
- People's Hospital of Deyang City, Deyang, Sichuan, China
| | - Shichao Xu
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Hongmei Lu
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Chunyan Xu
- School of Nursing, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jufang Li
- School of Nursing, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
- Wenzhou Manna Medical Technology Ltd, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Xiaoling Zhu
- School of Nursing, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
- Wenzhou Manna Medical Technology Ltd, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|