Precore and basal core promoter mutations in Asian American patients with hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B

Clinical implication and viral mutation in basal core promoter/pre-core of hepatitis B virus C/D recombinant

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) C/D recombinant is predominant in Tibet in Western China. Although the geographical and ethnic distributions of the C/D recombinant have been described, the clinical implication and the characteristics of viral mutation in the basal core promoter (BCP)/pre-core (PC) region remain unclear.

METHODS

A total of 174 chronic HBV carriers, including 115 with chronic hepatitis B, 45 with liver cirrhosis, and 14 with hepatocellular carcinoma, were enrolled. Using next-generation sequencing, the S and BCP/PC genes were determined and analyzed.

RESULTS

Genotypes B, C2, D, and C/D recombinant were detected in 1.1% (2/174), 19.5% (34/174), 0.6% (1/174) and 78.7% (137/174) of the patients, respectively. The clinical parameters and viral mutation frequency in the BCP/PC region were compared between C2- and C/D recombinant-infected patients. The distribution of C2 and C/D did not differ by disease status or liver function. Significantly higher levels of HBV DNA (6.7 ± 1.6 vs. 5.9 ± 1.5, p = 0.014), HBeAg (263.5 vs. 20.0, p = 0.013) and A1762T/G1764A double-mutations (81.0 vs. 61.8%, p = 0.018), but a lower frequency of G1896A stop mutation (33.6 vs. 76.5%, p < 0.001) was observed in patients with the C/D recombinant than in patients with genotype C2. The clonal frequencies of A1762T, G1764A, G1896A and A1846T were lower in patients with C/D than C2.

CONCLUSION

The C/D recombinant has different mutation pattern in the BCP/PC region compared with genotype C2. The lower clonal frequencies of BCP/PC mutations may explain the higher levels of HBV DNA and HBeAg in C/D-infected patients.

Host and Viral Genetic Variation in HBV-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer in men and the second leading cause of cancer deaths globally. The high prevalence of HCC is due in part to the high prevalence of chronic HBV infection and the high mortality rate is due to the lack of biomarkers for early detection and limited treatment options for late stage HCC. The observed individual variance in development of HCC is attributable to differences in HBV genotype and mutations, host predisposing germline genetic variations, the acquisition of tumor-specific somatic mutations, as well as environmental factors. HBV genotype C and mutations in the preS, basic core promoter (BCP) or HBx regions are associated with an increased risk of HCC. Genome-wide association studies have identified common polymorphisms in KIF1B, HLA-DQ, STAT4, and GRIK1 with altered risk of HBV-related HCC. HBV integration into growth control genes (such as TERT), pro-oncogenic genes, or tumor suppressor genes and the oncogenic activity of truncated HBx promote hepatocarcinogenesis. Somatic mutations in the TERT promoter and classic cancer signaling pathways, including Wnt (CTNNB1), cell cycle regulation (TP53), and epigenetic modification (ARID2 and MLL4) are frequently detected in hepatic tumor tissues. The identification of HBV and host variation associated with tumor initiation and progression has clinical utility for improving early diagnosis and prognosis; whereas the identification of somatic mutations driving tumorigenesis hold promise to inform precision treatment for HCC patients.

Analysis of HBV basal core promoter/precore gene variability in patients with HBV drug resistance and HIV co-infection in Northwest Ethiopia

Background

We recently reported complex hepatitis B virus (HBV) drug resistant and concomitant vaccine escape hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) variants during human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection and antiretroviral therapy (ART) exposure in Ethiopia. As a continuation of this report using the HBV positive sera from the same study participants, the current study further analyzed the HBV basal core promoter (BCP)/precore (PC) genes variability in patients with HBV drug resistance (at tyrosine-methionine-aspartate-aspartate (YMDD) reverse transcriptase (RT) motifs) and HIV co-infection in comparison with HBV mono-infected counterparts with no HBV drug resistant gene variants.

Materials and methods

A total of 143 participants of HBV-HIV co-infected (n = 48), HBV mono-infected blood donors (n = 43) and chronic liver disease (CLD) patients (n = 52) were included in the study. The BCP/PC genome regions responsible for HBeAg expression from the EcoRI site (nucleotides 1653–1959) were sequenced and analyzed for the BCP/PC mutant variants.

Results

Among the major mutant variants detected, double BCP mutations (A1762T/G1764A) (25.9%), Kozak sequences mutations (nt1809-1812) (51.7%) and the classical PC mutations such as A1814C/C1816T (15.4%), G1896A (25.2%) and G1862T (44.8%) were predominant mutant variants. The prevalence of the double BCP mutations was significantly lower in HIV co-infected patients (8.3%) compared with HBV mono-infected blood donors (32.6%) and CLD patients (36.5%). However, the Kozak sequences BCP mutations and the majority of PC mutations showed no significant differences among the study groups. Moreover, except for the overall BCP/PC mutant variants, co-prevalence rates of each major BCP/PC mutations and YMDDRT motif associated lamivudine (3TC)/entecavir (ETV) resistance mutations showed no significant differences when compared with the rates of BCP/PC mutations without YMDD RT motif drug resistance gene mutations. Unlike HIV co-infected group, no similar comparison made among HBV mono-infected blood donors and CLD patients since none of them developed the YMDD RT motif associated 3TC/ETV resistance mutations. However, HBV mono-infected blood donors and CLD patients who had no any drug resistance gene variants developed comparable G1862T (60.6% vs. 65.1%) and G1896A (24.2% vs. 11.6%) PC gene mutations.

Conclusion

No correlation observed between the BCP/PC genome variability and the YMDD RT motif associated HBV drug resistance gene variants during HIV co-infection. Nevertheless, irrespective of HIV co-infection status, the higher records of the BCP/PC gene variability in this study setting indicate a high risk of potential HBeAg negative chronic HBV infection in Northwest Ethiopia.

Clinical Features of Chronic Hepatitis B in Treatment-naive Asian Patients With Positive HBeAg and Coexisting Precore and/or Basal Core Promoter Mutations

BACKGROUND

Precore or/and basal core promoter (PC/BCP) mutations are frequently detected in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative patients, but little is known about their clinical significance in HBeAg-positive patients.

AIM

To characterize and report the clinical features of treatment-naive chronic hepatitis B patients who are HBeAg positive and harbor PC and/or BCP mutations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Consecutive treatment-naive patients with chronic hepatitis B between 2004 and 2014 were enrolled. Clinical characteristics were compared based on the stratification of HBeAg status and the presence of PC/BCP mutations. In addition, subset analysis in HBeAg-positive cohort was performed to compare clinical features of patients with and without PC/BCP mutations RESULTS:: Of the 267 patients enrolled from 3 centers, 177 were HBeAg positive and 90 HBeAg negative. When compared with HBeAg-negative patients, HBeAg-positive patients were significantly younger in mean age (37.93 vs. 44.40; P<0.001), had higher levels of median ALT (51 vs. 30.5 U/mL; P<0.001), higher levels of mean HBV DNA (7.50±1.48 vs. 5.10±1.44 log10 copies/mL; P<0.001), and lower frequency of detectable PC/BCP mutations (60.45% vs. 93.33%; P<0.001), but had significantly higher frequency of BCP when mutations were detected (37.85% vs. 22.22%; P=0.013). Among HBeAg-positive patients, when compared with patients with wild type, those with PC/BCP mutations were significantly older (30.63 vs. 42.71; P<0.001), had higher median ALT levels (29.5 vs. 73 U/mL; P<0.001), but there was no significant association with mean HBV DNA levels (7.96 vs. 7.20 log10 copies/mL; P=0.865) or HBV genotype (P=1.000). In the multivariate analysis, only age and ALT were independently associated with PC/BCP mutations in HBeAg-positive patients, but there was no association with HBV genotype or DNA.

CONCLUSIONS

PC/BCP mutants were frequent (up to 60%) in treatment-naive HBeAg-positive patients and were associated with distinct clinical characteristics when compared with patients with wild type or HBeAg negative. Future large studies are needed to substantiate the long-term clinical outcomes when PC/BCP mutations are detected in HBeAg-positive patients as it may impact the natural history or treatment response in such patients.

Hepatitis B virus genotypes and variants

At least 10 hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotypes (A to J) with distinct geographic distributions and several HBV mutants, including precore/core promoter mutations and pre-S/S deletion mutations, have been recognized to be not only predictive of liver disease progression but also associated with response to antiviral therapy. HBV genotype-specific pathogenesis may contribute to heterogeneous clinical outcomes in chronic hepatitis B patients across the world. For example, patients with HBV genotypes C and D infection have a lower rate of spontaneous HBeAg seroconversion. In addition, HBV genotypes C and D have a higher frequency of core promoter and pre-S mutations than genotypes A and B. Genotypes C and D also carry a higher lifetime risk of cirrhosis and HCC development than genotypes A and B. Core promoter and pre-S mutations also correlate with an increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Therapeutically, genotypes A and B patients have a better response to interferon-based therapy than genotypes C and D patients, but the response to nucleos(t)ide analogs is comparable across different HBV genotypes. In conclusion, HBV genotypes and variants may serve as viral genetic markers to predict disease progression as well as help practicing physicians optimize individualized antiviral therapy in clinical practice.

High rate of core promoter and precore mutations in patients with chronic hepatitis B

Background

The prevalence of precore (PC) and core promoter (CP) mutations in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (CHB) and their impact on liver disease is incompletely defined in the United States.

Methods

A retrospective chart review using a cross-sectional approach of 1,186 CHB patients was conducted.

Results

Of 926 patients tested for HBV e antigen (HBeAg), 37 % were HBeAg+. Of 194 patients tested for mutations, 80 % had PC or CP mutations or both; 89 % of HBeAg-negative and 56 % of HBeAg+ patients had PC or CP mutations or both (p < 0.001). The mean log₁₀ ALT was significantly lower in patients with both mutations compared to patients without mutations. The mean log₁₀ HBV DNA was significantly lower in patients with only PC mutations (4.82) compared to patients without mutations (5.71, p = 0.019). With the study population divided into four subgroups based on ALT level at time of diagnosis, cirrhosis incidence was significantly higher in patients with ALT 1–2 × ULN and ALT > 2 × ULN compared to patients with ALT ≤ 0.5 × ULN.

Conclusions

Our finding that PC and CP mutations may be associated with milder liver disease in some patients could serve as the basis for longitudinal studies to help delineate treatment need and duration in patients with these mutations. If confirmed, the finding of an association between ALT 1–2 × ULN and increased incidence of cirrhosis could call into question guidelines which only recommend treatment with ALT > 2 × ULN.

The significance of hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotypes for the disease and treatment outcome among patients with chronic hepatitis B in Serbia

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotypes influence disease progression and treatment outcome.

OBJECTIVES

To determine natural history and treatment outcome in patient chronically infected with HBV.

STUDY DESIGN

A cohort study included 162 treatment naive patients with chronic HBV infection in order to analyze factors influencing natural history of infection and survival.

RESULTS

Genotype A was far less prevalent, detected in 14.2%. The prevalence of HbeAg+ serology of 60.8% among patients infected with genotype A was significantly higher then 30.9% recorded among those with genotype D (P=0.02). Even though patients from two genotypes subgroups had significantly different prevalence of HBeAg serology, their viral loads were similar at the time of diagnosis (2.90 log10 and 3.31 log10 HBV DNK IU/μl plasma, for genotypes A and D, respectively). The analyses of viral loads across three serologic patterns of chronic HBV infection were: for HBeAg+/HBeAb-, HbeAg-/HBAb+, and both "e" antigen and antibodies negative: 4.24, 2.67 and 2.69 log10 IU/ml of HBV DNA IU/μl, respectively (P=0.01). Mean time to liver cirrhosis was 23.2±3.4 years and 15.1±8.4 years, for genotypes A and D, respectively (P=0.02). The overall estimated mean survival of patients with chronic HBV infection was 28.4 years, and was influenced by the stage of liver disease, but not by gender, age above 40, viral genotype and lamivudine therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients infected with genotype D had more rapid progression to ESLD regardless of levels of viral replication. All clinical and laboratory differences between genotypes did not affect survival of patients with chronic hepatitis B, regardless of lamivudine therapy.