1
|
Outtier A, Louis E, Dewit O, Reenaers C, Schops G, Lenfant M, Pontus E, De Hertogh G, Verstockt B, Sabino J, Vermeire S, Ferrante M. Efficacy and Safety of Ustekinumab for Chronic Pouchitis: A Prospective Open-label Multicenter Study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024:S1542-3565(24)00438-5. [PMID: 38750870 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.04.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Revised: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Seventeen percent of patients with ulcerative colitis that undergo proctocolectomy with pouch surgery will develop chronic pouchitis. We evaluated the efficacy of ustekinumab for these patients. METHODS We performed a prospective study of patients with chronic pouchitis receiving ustekinumab intravenously at baseline (∼6 mg/kg) and 90 mg ustekinumab subcutaneously every 8 weeks thereafter. The Modified Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (mPDAI) was assessed at baseline and weeks 16 and 48. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving steroid-free remission (mPDAI <5 and reduction by ≥2 points) at week 16. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients achieving remission at week 48, the proportion of patients achieving response (reduction of mPDAI by ≥2 points) at weeks 16 and 48, and change in mPDAI. RESULTS We enrolled 22 patients (59% male; median age, 42.2 years). Remission was achieved in 27.3% at week 16 and 36.4% at week 48. Response was achieved in 54.5% both at weeks 16 and 48. The median mPDAI decreased from 8 (interquartile range [IQR], 7-10) to 7 (IQR, 4-9) at week 16 (P = .007) and 4 (IQR, 1.75-7.25) at week 48 (P < .001). The clinical mPDAI subscore decreased from 3.5 (IQR, 2-4) to 2 (IQR, 1-3) at week 16 (P = .009) and 1 (IQR, 0-2.25) at week 48 (P = .001). The endoscopic mPDAI subscore decreased from 5.5 (IQR, 4-6) to 4 (IQR, 3-6) at week 16 (P = .032) and 3 (IQR, 1.75-4.25) at week 48 (P = .001). CONCLUSION Ustekinumab was efficacious in one-half of the patients suffering from chronic pouchitis. Ustekinumab should therefore be positioned in the treatment algorithm of chronic pouchitis. (ClinicalTrials.gov Number NCT04089345).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- An Outtier
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Disorders, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Edouard Louis
- Department of Gastroenterology, CHU Liège, Sart Tilman, Liège, Belgium
| | - Olivier Dewit
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Ganel Schops
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Matthias Lenfant
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Disorders, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Emilie Pontus
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gert De Hertogh
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bram Verstockt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Disorders, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - João Sabino
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Disorders, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Séverine Vermeire
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Disorders, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marc Ferrante
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Disorders, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mocci G, Tursi A, Onidi FM, Usai-Satta P, Pes GM, Dore MP. Ustekinumab in the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Evolving Paradigms. J Clin Med 2024; 13:1519. [PMID: 38592377 PMCID: PMC10933994 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel diseases, comprising Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), are chronic, relapsing, and remitting immune-mediated inflammatory diseases affecting the gastrointestinal tract. Ustekinumab (UST) is a monoclonal antibody that blocks the p40 subunit of the anti-interleukin (IL) 12/23. Pivotal trials (CERTIFI and UNITI-IM for CD, UNIFI for UC) established the efficacy of UST for the induction and maintenance of remission in both CD and UC, with the most favorable results in naïve patients to biologics. In recent years, a wealth of 'real-world' data has emerged supporting positive clinical, endoscopic, and histological outcomes in patients treated with UST, as well as reassuring safety data. More recently, the results of the first head-to-head trials of UST and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists were reported. Moreover, a number of studies exploring the role of UST in specific clinical settings, such as perianal CD, postoperative complications and recurrence, extraintestinal manifestations, chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis, and pregnancy, were reported. This review explores the results reported to date on UST, including those from pivotal trials, real-world data, and emerging studies regarding therapeutic drug monitoring and immunogenicity. The safety profile of UST was also reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giammarco Mocci
- Division of Gastroenterology, “Brotzu” Hospital, 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (G.M.); (F.M.O.); (P.U.-S.)
| | - Antonio Tursi
- Territorial Gastroenterology Service, ASL BAT, 76123 Andria, Italy;
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, School of Medicine, Catholic University, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Maria Onidi
- Division of Gastroenterology, “Brotzu” Hospital, 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (G.M.); (F.M.O.); (P.U.-S.)
| | - Paolo Usai-Satta
- Division of Gastroenterology, “Brotzu” Hospital, 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (G.M.); (F.M.O.); (P.U.-S.)
| | - Giovanni Mario Pes
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Pharmacy, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy;
| | - Maria Pina Dore
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Pharmacy, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy;
- Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Godoy-Brewer G, Salem G, Limketkai B, Selaru FM, Grossen A, Policarpo T, Haq Z, Parian AM. Use of Biologics for the Treatment of Inflammatory Conditions of the Pouch: A Systematic Review. J Clin Gastroenterol 2024; 58:183-194. [PMID: 36753457 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with medically-refractory ulcerative colitis or advanced neoplasia are often offered an ileal-pouch-anal anastomosis to restore bowel continuity. However, up to 50% of patients can suffer from inflammatory conditions of the pouch, some of which require biological therapy to treat. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of each biological agent for the treatment of inflammatory conditions of the pouch. MATERIALS AND METHODS A comprehensive literature search was performed in the major databases from inception through February 11, 2020, for studies assessing the efficacy of biologics in chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis (CARP) and Crohn's disease (CD) of the pouch. Both prospective and retrospective studies were included. The primary outcomes of interest were complete and partial responses were defined within each study. χ 2 test was used to compare variables. RESULTS Thirty-four studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Sixteen studies (N=247) evaluated the use of infliximab (IFX), showing complete response in 50.7% and partial response in 28.1% for CARP, and complete response in 66.7% and partial response in 20% for CD of the pouch. Seven studies (n=107) assessed the efficacy of adalimumab. For CARP, 33.3% of patients had a complete response, and 38.1% had a partial response, whereas for CD of the pouch, 47.7% experienced a complete response, and 24.6% had a partial response. Three studies (n=78) reported outcomes with the use of ustekinumab, showing 50% complete response and 3.8% partial response for CARP. For the CD of the pouch, 5.8% had a complete response and 78.8% had a partial response. Seven studies (n=151) reported the efficacy of vedolizumab, showing 28.4% complete response and 43.2% partial response in patients with CARP, whereas 63% of patients experienced partial response in CD of the pouch. IFX had higher rates of complete response in CARP compared with adalimumab ( P =0.04) and compared with vedolizumab ( P =0.005), but not compared with ustekinumab ( P =0.95). There were no new safety signals reported in any of the studies. CONCLUSIONS Biologics are safe and efficacious in the treatment of chronic, refractory inflammatory conditions of the pouch. IFX seems to be more efficacious than adalimumab and vedolizumab for CARP. Further prospective, head-to-head evaluations are needed to compare biological therapies in the treatment of CARP and CD of the pouch.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - George Salem
- Division of Digestive Diseases, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma, OK
| | - Berkeley Limketkai
- Division of Digestive Diseases, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Florin M Selaru
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Alyssa Grossen
- Division of Digestive Diseases, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma, OK
| | - Tatiana Policarpo
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Zadid Haq
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Alyssa M Parian
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Barnes EL, Agrawal M, Syal G, Ananthakrishnan AN, Cohen BL, Haydek JP, Al Kazzi ES, Eisenstein S, Hashash JG, Sultan SS, Raffals LE, Singh S. AGA Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Pouchitis and Inflammatory Pouch Disorders. Gastroenterology 2024; 166:59-85. [PMID: 38128971 PMCID: PMC11163976 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Pouchitis is the most common complication after restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. This American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) guideline is intended to support practitioners in the management of pouchitis and inflammatory pouch disorders. METHODS A multidisciplinary panel of content experts and guideline methodologists used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework to prioritize clinical questions, identify patient-centered outcomes, conduct an evidence synthesis, and develop recommendations for the prevention and treatment of pouchitis, Crohn's-like disease of the pouch, and cuffitis. RESULTS The AGA guideline panel made 9 conditional recommendations. In patients with ulcerative colitis who have undergone ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and experience intermittent symptoms of pouchitis, the AGA suggests using antibiotics for the treatment of pouchitis. In patients who experience recurrent episodes of pouchitis that respond to antibiotics, the AGA suggests using probiotics for the prevention of recurrent pouchitis. In patients who experience recurrent pouchitis that responds to antibiotics but relapses shortly after stopping antibiotics (also known as "chronic antibiotic-dependent pouchitis"), the AGA suggests using chronic antibiotic therapy to prevent recurrent pouchitis; however, in patients who are intolerant to antibiotics or who are concerned about the risks of long-term antibiotic therapy, the AGA suggests using advanced immunosuppressive therapies (eg, biologics and/or oral small molecule drugs) approved for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. In patients who experience recurrent pouchitis with inadequate response to antibiotics (also known as "chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis"), the AGA suggests using advanced immunosuppressive therapies; corticosteroids can also be considered in these patients. In patients who develop symptoms due to Crohn's-like disease of the pouch, the AGA suggests using corticosteroids and advanced immunosuppressive therapies. In patients who experience symptoms due to cuffitis, the AGA suggests using therapies that have been approved for the treatment of ulcerative colitis, starting with topical mesalamine or topical corticosteroids. The panel also proposed key implementation considerations for optimal management of pouchitis and Crohn's-like disease of the pouch and identified several knowledge gaps and areas for future research. CONCLUSIONS This guideline provides a comprehensive, patient-centered approach to the management of patients with pouchitis and other inflammatory conditions of the pouch.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward L Barnes
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Manasi Agrawal
- The Dr Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Center for Molecular Prediction of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Gaurav Syal
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Benjamin L Cohen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - John P Haydek
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Elie S Al Kazzi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Samuel Eisenstein
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Jana G Hashash
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Shahnaz S Sultan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Laura E Raffals
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Siddharth Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Barnes EL, Kayal M, Schwartzberg DM. The Rational Use of Advanced Therapies for Inflammatory Conditions of the Pouch. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2023; 29:2007-2009. [PMID: 37897227 PMCID: PMC10697410 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izad264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023]
Abstract
Lay Summary
We have seen an emergence of new literature supporting the use of advanced therapies in the treatment of chronic inflammatory conditions of the pouch. In this discussion, we review the use of advanced therapies for chronic pouchitis and Crohn’s-like disease of the pouch and suggest future directions for research and clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward L Barnes
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Maia Kayal
- Division of Gastroenterology, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - David M Schwartzberg
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Khoo E, Lee A, Neeman T, An Y, Begun J. Comprehensive systematic review and pooled analysis of real-world studies evaluating immunomodulator and biologic therapies for chronic pouchitis treatment. JGH Open 2023; 7:899-907. [PMID: 38162843 PMCID: PMC10757477 DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.13000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
Background and Aim Pouchitis is a common complication after restorative ileal pouch-anal anastomosis following proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. Antibiotic-dependent or antibiotic-refractory chronic pouchitis (CP), which is a common cause of pouch failure affecting 15-20% of patients, is challenging to treat. The efficacy of second-line immunomodulator and biologic therapy remains poorly defined. We present a pooled analysis of real-world efficacy data from peer-reviewed full-text manuscripts, focusing on immunomodulator and biologic therapies in CP. Methods Embase and PubMed databases were searched for full-text articles describing the treatment of CP. We performed a systematic review and pooled analysis of published studies to assess the efficacy of immunomodulators, including thiopurines and methotrexate, and biologics including antitumor necrosis factor, anti-integrin, and interleukin-12/23 antagonists. Clinical and endoscopic response and remission rates were combined for pooled analyses. Rates of treatment discontinuation and safety were also assessed. Results Pooled analysis comprised 20 full-text articles (485 patients). Overall clinical response rate was 46% (95% CI: 35-59%) and clinical remission rate was 35% (95% CI: 21-52%). Overall endoscopic response and remission rates were 41% (95% CI: 18-68%) and 15% (95% CI: 5-39%), respectively. Individual agents' safety profile was reassuring, with vedolizumab being the most favorable. Conclusion The real-world efficacy data of immunomodulators in the treatment of CP is insufficient. Vedolizumab and ustekinumab appeared effective and safe for CP, whereas anti-TNFs showed higher rates of adverse events. The high heterogeneity within the studies is attributed to the real-world study design, obfuscating drug efficacy comparisons across the studies. Further studies are required to define the comparative effectiveness of available treatments of CP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emi Khoo
- Mater Hospital BrisbaneBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
- School of MedicineUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
- Mater ResearchBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Andrew Lee
- Mater Hospital BrisbaneBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
- School of MedicineUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Teresa Neeman
- Biology Data Science InstituteAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralian Capital TerritoryAustralia
| | - Yoon‐Kyo An
- Mater Hospital BrisbaneBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
- School of MedicineUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
- Mater ResearchBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Jakob Begun
- Mater Hospital BrisbaneBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
- School of MedicineUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
- Mater ResearchBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Travis S, Silverberg MS, Danese S, Gionchetti P, Löwenberg M, Jairath V, Feagan BG, Bressler B, Ferrante M, Hart A, Lindner D, Escher A, Jones S, Shen B. Vedolizumab for the Treatment of Chronic Pouchitis. N Engl J Med 2023; 388:1191-1200. [PMID: 36988594 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2208450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately half the patients with ulcerative colitis who undergo restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) will subsequently have pouchitis, and among those patients, one fifth will have chronic pouchitis. METHODS We conducted a phase 4, double-blind, randomized trial to evaluate vedolizumab in adult patients in whom chronic pouchitis had developed after undergoing IPAA for ulcerative colitis. Patients were assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) to receive vedolizumab intravenously at a dose of 300 mg or placebo on day 1 and at weeks 2, 6, 14, 22, and 30. All the patients received concomitant ciprofloxacin from weeks 1 to 4. The primary end point was modified Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (mPDAI)-defined remission (an mPDAI score of ≤4 and a reduction from baseline of ≥2 points in the mPDAI total score; scores range from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating more severe pouchitis) at week 14. The mPDAI is based on clinical symptoms and endoscopic findings. Other efficacy end points included mPDAI-defined remission at week 34, mPDAI-defined response (a reduction from baseline of ≥2 points in the mPDAI score) at weeks 14 and 34, and PDAI-defined remission (a PDAI score of ≤6 and a reduction from baseline of ≥3 points; scores range from 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating more severe pouchitis) at weeks 14 and 34. The PDAI is based on clinical symptoms, endoscopic findings, and histologic findings. RESULTS Among the 102 patients who underwent randomization, the incidence of mPDAI-defined remission at week 14 was 31% (16 of 51 patients) with vedolizumab and 10% (5 of 51 patients) with placebo (difference, 21 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5 to 38; P = 0.01). Differences in favor of vedolizumab over placebo were also seen with respect to mPDAI-defined remission at week 34 (difference, 17 percentage points; 95% CI, 0 to 35), mPDAI-defined response at week 14 (difference, 30 percentage points; 95% CI, 8 to 48) and at week 34 (difference, 22 percentage points; 95% CI, 2 to 40), and PDAI-defined remission at week 14 (difference, 25 percentage points; 95% CI, 8 to 41) and at week 34 (difference, 19 percentage points; 95% CI, 2 to 37). Serious adverse events occurred in 3 of 51 patients (6%) in the vedolizumab group and in 4 of 51 patients (8%) in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with vedolizumab was more effective than placebo in inducing remission in patients who had chronic pouchitis after undergoing IPAA for ulcerative colitis. (Funded by Takeda; EARNEST ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02790138; EudraCT number, 2015-003472-78.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Travis
- From the Translational Gastroenterology Unit and Kennedy Institute, National Institute for Health and Care Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford (S.T.), and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, St. Mark's Hospital and Imperial College London, London (A.H.) - both in the United Kingdom; the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto (M.S.S.), the Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Western University (V.J.), and Alimentiv (V.J., B.G.F.), London, ON, and the Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (B.B.) - all in Canada; the Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan (S.D.), and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna (P.G.) - both in Italy; the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (M.L.); the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (M.F.); Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Zurich, Switzerland (D.L., A.E., S.J.); and the Interventional Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center and the Center for Ileal Pouch Disorders, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York (B.S.)
| | - Mark S Silverberg
- From the Translational Gastroenterology Unit and Kennedy Institute, National Institute for Health and Care Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford (S.T.), and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, St. Mark's Hospital and Imperial College London, London (A.H.) - both in the United Kingdom; the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto (M.S.S.), the Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Western University (V.J.), and Alimentiv (V.J., B.G.F.), London, ON, and the Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (B.B.) - all in Canada; the Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan (S.D.), and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna (P.G.) - both in Italy; the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (M.L.); the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (M.F.); Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Zurich, Switzerland (D.L., A.E., S.J.); and the Interventional Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center and the Center for Ileal Pouch Disorders, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York (B.S.)
| | - Silvio Danese
- From the Translational Gastroenterology Unit and Kennedy Institute, National Institute for Health and Care Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford (S.T.), and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, St. Mark's Hospital and Imperial College London, London (A.H.) - both in the United Kingdom; the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto (M.S.S.), the Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Western University (V.J.), and Alimentiv (V.J., B.G.F.), London, ON, and the Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (B.B.) - all in Canada; the Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan (S.D.), and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna (P.G.) - both in Italy; the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (M.L.); the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (M.F.); Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Zurich, Switzerland (D.L., A.E., S.J.); and the Interventional Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center and the Center for Ileal Pouch Disorders, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York (B.S.)
| | - Paolo Gionchetti
- From the Translational Gastroenterology Unit and Kennedy Institute, National Institute for Health and Care Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford (S.T.), and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, St. Mark's Hospital and Imperial College London, London (A.H.) - both in the United Kingdom; the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto (M.S.S.), the Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Western University (V.J.), and Alimentiv (V.J., B.G.F.), London, ON, and the Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (B.B.) - all in Canada; the Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan (S.D.), and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna (P.G.) - both in Italy; the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (M.L.); the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (M.F.); Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Zurich, Switzerland (D.L., A.E., S.J.); and the Interventional Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center and the Center for Ileal Pouch Disorders, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York (B.S.)
| | - Mark Löwenberg
- From the Translational Gastroenterology Unit and Kennedy Institute, National Institute for Health and Care Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford (S.T.), and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, St. Mark's Hospital and Imperial College London, London (A.H.) - both in the United Kingdom; the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto (M.S.S.), the Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Western University (V.J.), and Alimentiv (V.J., B.G.F.), London, ON, and the Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (B.B.) - all in Canada; the Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan (S.D.), and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna (P.G.) - both in Italy; the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (M.L.); the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (M.F.); Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Zurich, Switzerland (D.L., A.E., S.J.); and the Interventional Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center and the Center for Ileal Pouch Disorders, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York (B.S.)
| | - Vipul Jairath
- From the Translational Gastroenterology Unit and Kennedy Institute, National Institute for Health and Care Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford (S.T.), and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, St. Mark's Hospital and Imperial College London, London (A.H.) - both in the United Kingdom; the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto (M.S.S.), the Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Western University (V.J.), and Alimentiv (V.J., B.G.F.), London, ON, and the Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (B.B.) - all in Canada; the Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan (S.D.), and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna (P.G.) - both in Italy; the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (M.L.); the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (M.F.); Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Zurich, Switzerland (D.L., A.E., S.J.); and the Interventional Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center and the Center for Ileal Pouch Disorders, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York (B.S.)
| | - Brian G Feagan
- From the Translational Gastroenterology Unit and Kennedy Institute, National Institute for Health and Care Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford (S.T.), and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, St. Mark's Hospital and Imperial College London, London (A.H.) - both in the United Kingdom; the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto (M.S.S.), the Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Western University (V.J.), and Alimentiv (V.J., B.G.F.), London, ON, and the Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (B.B.) - all in Canada; the Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan (S.D.), and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna (P.G.) - both in Italy; the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (M.L.); the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (M.F.); Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Zurich, Switzerland (D.L., A.E., S.J.); and the Interventional Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center and the Center for Ileal Pouch Disorders, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York (B.S.)
| | - Brian Bressler
- From the Translational Gastroenterology Unit and Kennedy Institute, National Institute for Health and Care Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford (S.T.), and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, St. Mark's Hospital and Imperial College London, London (A.H.) - both in the United Kingdom; the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto (M.S.S.), the Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Western University (V.J.), and Alimentiv (V.J., B.G.F.), London, ON, and the Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (B.B.) - all in Canada; the Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan (S.D.), and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna (P.G.) - both in Italy; the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (M.L.); the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (M.F.); Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Zurich, Switzerland (D.L., A.E., S.J.); and the Interventional Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center and the Center for Ileal Pouch Disorders, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York (B.S.)
| | - Marc Ferrante
- From the Translational Gastroenterology Unit and Kennedy Institute, National Institute for Health and Care Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford (S.T.), and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, St. Mark's Hospital and Imperial College London, London (A.H.) - both in the United Kingdom; the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto (M.S.S.), the Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Western University (V.J.), and Alimentiv (V.J., B.G.F.), London, ON, and the Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (B.B.) - all in Canada; the Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan (S.D.), and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna (P.G.) - both in Italy; the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (M.L.); the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (M.F.); Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Zurich, Switzerland (D.L., A.E., S.J.); and the Interventional Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center and the Center for Ileal Pouch Disorders, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York (B.S.)
| | - Ailsa Hart
- From the Translational Gastroenterology Unit and Kennedy Institute, National Institute for Health and Care Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford (S.T.), and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, St. Mark's Hospital and Imperial College London, London (A.H.) - both in the United Kingdom; the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto (M.S.S.), the Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Western University (V.J.), and Alimentiv (V.J., B.G.F.), London, ON, and the Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (B.B.) - all in Canada; the Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan (S.D.), and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna (P.G.) - both in Italy; the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (M.L.); the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (M.F.); Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Zurich, Switzerland (D.L., A.E., S.J.); and the Interventional Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center and the Center for Ileal Pouch Disorders, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York (B.S.)
| | - Dirk Lindner
- From the Translational Gastroenterology Unit and Kennedy Institute, National Institute for Health and Care Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford (S.T.), and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, St. Mark's Hospital and Imperial College London, London (A.H.) - both in the United Kingdom; the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto (M.S.S.), the Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Western University (V.J.), and Alimentiv (V.J., B.G.F.), London, ON, and the Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (B.B.) - all in Canada; the Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan (S.D.), and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna (P.G.) - both in Italy; the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (M.L.); the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (M.F.); Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Zurich, Switzerland (D.L., A.E., S.J.); and the Interventional Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center and the Center for Ileal Pouch Disorders, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York (B.S.)
| | - Armella Escher
- From the Translational Gastroenterology Unit and Kennedy Institute, National Institute for Health and Care Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford (S.T.), and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, St. Mark's Hospital and Imperial College London, London (A.H.) - both in the United Kingdom; the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto (M.S.S.), the Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Western University (V.J.), and Alimentiv (V.J., B.G.F.), London, ON, and the Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (B.B.) - all in Canada; the Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan (S.D.), and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna (P.G.) - both in Italy; the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (M.L.); the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (M.F.); Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Zurich, Switzerland (D.L., A.E., S.J.); and the Interventional Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center and the Center for Ileal Pouch Disorders, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York (B.S.)
| | - Stephen Jones
- From the Translational Gastroenterology Unit and Kennedy Institute, National Institute for Health and Care Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford (S.T.), and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, St. Mark's Hospital and Imperial College London, London (A.H.) - both in the United Kingdom; the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto (M.S.S.), the Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Western University (V.J.), and Alimentiv (V.J., B.G.F.), London, ON, and the Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (B.B.) - all in Canada; the Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan (S.D.), and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna (P.G.) - both in Italy; the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (M.L.); the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (M.F.); Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Zurich, Switzerland (D.L., A.E., S.J.); and the Interventional Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center and the Center for Ileal Pouch Disorders, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York (B.S.)
| | - Bo Shen
- From the Translational Gastroenterology Unit and Kennedy Institute, National Institute for Health and Care Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford (S.T.), and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, St. Mark's Hospital and Imperial College London, London (A.H.) - both in the United Kingdom; the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto (M.S.S.), the Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Western University (V.J.), and Alimentiv (V.J., B.G.F.), London, ON, and the Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (B.B.) - all in Canada; the Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan (S.D.), and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna (P.G.) - both in Italy; the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (M.L.); the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (M.F.); Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Zurich, Switzerland (D.L., A.E., S.J.); and the Interventional Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center and the Center for Ileal Pouch Disorders, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York (B.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Calvino-Suarez C, Ferreiro-Iglesias R, Baston Rey I, Barreiro-de Acosta M. Managing ulcerative colitis after surgery. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 9:1081940. [PMID: 36687422 PMCID: PMC9846502 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1081940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Management of ulcerative colitis after surgery suggested by guidelines (total proctocolectomy with ileal-pouch anal anastomosis) is a big challenge for physicians because patients who believed that their disease had been cured started experiencing very uncomfortable symptoms repeatedly. A high number of patients develop episodes of pouchitis, which is a non-specific inflammation of the pouch whose etiology is unknown. Antibiotics are the elective treatment for acute pouchitis, but regarding chronic pouchitis, this condition is very complicated to treat due to the absence of well-designed specific studies for this group of patients. Antibiotics, budesonide, and biological therapies are some of the recommended drugs for these patients, but despite their use, some need a permanent ileostomy.
Collapse
|
9
|
Chen SL, Faye AS, Chang S. Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in the Older Adult: a Review of Postoperative Outcomes and Pouchitis Treatment. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN GASTROENTEROLOGY 2022; 20:564-581. [PMID: 36844648 PMCID: PMC9957085 DOI: 10.1007/s11938-022-00405-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become the preferred surgical treatment for patients with medically refractive ulcerative colitis (UC). Previous studies have suggested that outcomes of this procedure may be worse in older patients; however, more recent reports have suggested that IPAA in select patients is safe, feasible, and results in good quality of life. In this review, we discuss the recent literature surrounding clinical considerations and treatment management of IPAA in older adults. RECENT FINDINGS IPAA complication rates and adverse events are similar in the older adult population, as compared to the younger adult patient population. Although fecal urgency and incontinence may be more common among older adults, chronological age alone is not a contraindication for IPAA surgery, as good quality of life can still be achieved. In this review, we will also discuss the development of pouchitis after IPAA, particularly among older adults, as the emergence of newer biologic drugs has shifted the treatment landscape. SUMMARY IPAA can be a safe and effective treatment modality for older adults with UC, with high self-reported patient satisfaction. Patient optimization and careful case selection are vital to achieving these outcomes, and specialized preoperative assessments and counseling can help facilitate the proper treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina L. Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 305 East 33rd Street, NY 10016 New York, USA
| | - Adam S. Faye
- Department of Gastroenterology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 305 East 33rd Street, NY 10016 New York, USA
| | - Shannon Chang
- Department of Gastroenterology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 305 East 33rd Street, NY 10016 New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Connelly TM, Lincango E, Holubar SD. Crohn's of the Pouch: Now What? Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2022; 35:475-486. [PMID: 36591396 PMCID: PMC9797285 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Total proctocolectomy and ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the gold standard surgical treatment for the majority (∼90%) of ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. In cases of carefully selected Crohn's colitis patients without small bowel or perianal involvement an "intentional IPAA" may be a viable option for disease resection and restoration of intestinal continuity. More commonly, Crohn's is incidentally found either in the resection specimen or, more commonly, when inflammatory complications subsequently arise after pouch construction for UC or indeterminate colitis. These incidental Crohn's pouches may be diagnosed early or late period post-IPAA. Crohn's may manifest within the pouch, in the proximal small bowel, and/or distally in the rectal cuff or anus. Like intestinal Crohn's, Crohn's disease of the pouch may be of an inflammatory, fibrostenosing, or fistulizing phenotype. Treatment depends on the phenotype and includes medical treatment, most commonly in the form of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor medications; however, the newer small molecules offer a potential treatment for these patients. Surgery first entails treating the sequelae of Crohn's and is typically staged. In up to 60% of Crohn's pouches, particularly in fistulizing disease and/or recalcitrant perianal disease, the pouch fails and must be defunctioned or excised. In patients with Crohn's pouches in situ long term, outcomes including quality of life are comparable to patients who underwent IPAA for UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara M. Connelly
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Eddy Lincango
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Stefan D. Holubar
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Barnes EL, Deepak P, Beniwal-Patel P, Raffals L, Kayal M, Dubinsky M, Chang S, Higgins PDR, Barr JI, Galanko J, Jiang Y, Cross RK, Long MD, Herfarth HH. Treatment Patterns and Standardized Outcome Assessments Among Patients With Inflammatory Conditions of the Pouch in a Prospective Multicenter Registry. CROHN'S & COLITIS 360 2022; 4:otac030. [PMID: 36082341 PMCID: PMC9446900 DOI: 10.1093/crocol/otac030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Much of our understanding about the natural history of pouch-related disorders has been generated from selected populations. We designed a geographically diverse, prospective registry to study the disease course among patients with 1 of 4 inflammatory conditions of the pouch. The primary objectives in this study were to demonstrate the feasibility of a prospective pouch registry and to evaluate the predominant treatment patterns for pouch-related disorders.
Methods
We used standardized diagnostic criteria to prospectively enroll patients with acute pouchitis, chronic antibiotic-dependent pouchitis (CADP), chronic antibiotic refractory pouchitis (CARP), or Crohn’s disease (CD) of the pouch. We obtained detailed clinical and demographic data at the time of enrollment, along with patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures.
Results
We enrolled 318 patients (10% acute pouchitis, 27% CADP, 12% CARP, and 51% CD of the pouch). Among all patients, 55% were on a biologic or small molecule therapy. Patients with CD of the pouch were more likely to use several classes of therapy (P < .001). Among patients with active disease at the time of enrollment, 23% with CARP and 40% with CD of the pouch were in clinical remission at 6 months after enrollment.
Conclusions
In a population where most patients had refractory inflammatory conditions of the pouch, we established a framework to evaluate PROs and clinical effectiveness. This infrastructure will be valuable for long-term studies of real-world effectiveness for pouch-related disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward L Barnes
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, North Carolina , USA
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, North Carolina , USA
| | - Parakkal Deepak
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis , St. Louis, Missouri , USA
| | - Poonam Beniwal-Patel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin , Milwaukee, Wisconsin , USA
| | - Laura Raffals
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota , USA
| | - Maia Kayal
- Division of Gastroenterology, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York, New York , USA
| | - Marla Dubinsky
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York, New York , USA
| | - Shannon Chang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, NYU Langone Health , New York, New York , USA
| | - Peter D R Higgins
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan , USA
| | - Jennifer I Barr
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, North Carolina , USA
| | - Joseph Galanko
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, North Carolina , USA
| | - Yue Jiang
- Trinity College of Arts and Sciences, Duke University , Durham, North Carolina , USA
| | - Raymond K Cross
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland , USA
| | - Millie D Long
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, North Carolina , USA
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, North Carolina , USA
| | - Hans H Herfarth
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, North Carolina , USA
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, North Carolina , USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Shen B, Kochhar GS, Rubin DT, Kane SV, Navaneethan U, Bernstein CN, Cross RK, Sugita A, Schairer J, Kiran RP, Fleshner P, McCormick JT, D'Hoore A, Shah SA, Farraye FA, Kariv R, Liu X, Rosh J, Chang S, Scherl E, Schwartz DA, Kotze PG, Bruining DH, Philpott J, Abraham B, Segal J, Sedano R, Kayal M, Bentley-Hibbert S, Tarabar D, El-Hachem S, Sehgal P, Picoraro JA, Vermeire S, Sandborn WJ, Silverberg MS, Pardi DS. Treatment of pouchitis, Crohn's disease, cuffitis, and other inflammatory disorders of the pouch: consensus guidelines from the International Ileal Pouch Consortium. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 7:69-95. [PMID: 34774224 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(21)00214-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Revised: 05/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Pouchitis, Crohn's disease of the pouch, cuffitis, polyps, and extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease are common inflammatory disorders of the ileal pouch. Acute pouchitis is treated with oral antibiotics and chronic pouchitis often requires anti-inflammatory therapy, including the use of biologics. Aetiological factors for secondary pouchitis should be evaluated and managed accordingly. Crohn's disease of the pouch is usually treated with biologics and its stricturing and fistulising complications can be treated with endoscopy or surgery. The underlying cause of cuffitis determines treatment strategies. Endoscopic polypectomy is recommended for large, symptomatic inflammatory polyps and polyps in the cuff. The management principles of extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease in patients with pouches are similar to those in patients without pouches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Shen
- Center for Interventional Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, NewYork Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Gursimran S Kochhar
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David T Rubin
- University of Chicago Medicine Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sunanda V Kane
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Udayakumar Navaneethan
- Center for IBD and Interventional IBD Unit, Digestive Health Institute, Orlando Health, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Charles N Bernstein
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clinical and Research Centre, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Raymond K Cross
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Program, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Maryland, MD, USA
| | - Akira Sugita
- Department of Clinical Research and Department of inflammatory Bowel Disease, Yokohama Municipal Citizens Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Jason Schairer
- Department of Gastroenterology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Ravi P Kiran
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, NewYork Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Philip Fleshner
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, University of California-Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - James T McCormick
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - André D'Hoore
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Samir A Shah
- Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Miriam Hospital, Gastroenterology Associates, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Francis A Farraye
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Revital Kariv
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Xiuli Liu
- Department of Pathology, Immunology, and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida, Gainsville, FL, USA
| | - Joel Rosh
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Goryeb Children's Hospital/Atlantic Health, Morristown, NJ, USA
| | - Shannon Chang
- Division of Gastroenterology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ellen Scherl
- Jill Roberts Center for IBD, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, NewYork Presbytarian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - David A Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | - David H Bruining
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jessica Philpott
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Bincy Abraham
- Houston Methodist and Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jonathan Segal
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hillingdon Hospital, Uxbridge, UK
| | - Rocio Sedano
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Maia Kayal
- Department of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Stuart Bentley-Hibbert
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, NewYork Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dino Tarabar
- IBD Clinical Center, University Hospital Center Dr Dragiša Mišović, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Sandra El-Hachem
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Priya Sehgal
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, NewYork Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joseph A Picoraro
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center-Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Séverine Vermeire
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - William J Sandborn
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Mark S Silverberg
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Darrell S Pardi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kayal M, Dubinsky MC. Medical management of chronic pouch inflammation. CURRENT RESEARCH IN PHARMACOLOGY AND DRUG DISCOVERY 2022; 3:100095. [PMID: 35281692 PMCID: PMC8913311 DOI: 10.1016/j.crphar.2022.100095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2021] [Revised: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
|
14
|
Melde M, Müller TM, Schneider I, Geppert CI, Mühl L, Besendorf L, Allner C, Becker E, Atreya I, Vitali F, Atreya R, Neurath MF, Zundler S. α4β7 integrin-dependent adhesion of T cells to MAdCAM-1 is blocked by vedolizumab in patients with chronic refractory pouchitis. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2021; 14:17562848211054707. [PMID: 34868349 PMCID: PMC8640978 DOI: 10.1177/17562848211054707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The anti-α4β7 integrin antibody vedolizumab is an established therapeutic option for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It has also been successfully used in patients with chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis following proctocolectomey with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. However, the expression and function of gut-homing markers as well as strategies to predict the response to vedolizumab in pouchitis are understudied so far. METHODS We used flow cytometry and dynamic adhesion assays to study the expression and function of gut-homing integrins on T cells from patients with pouchitis and controls as well as longitudinally during therapy of pouchitis with vedolizumab. Moreover, we describe clinical effects of vedolizumab in a cohort of patients with pouchitis. RESULTS T cells from patients with pouchitis express a specific profile of gut-homing integrins. Integrin α4β7 on T cells from patients with pouchitis mediates adhesion to mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule (MAdCAM)-1, which can be blocked by vedolizumab in vitro. Vedolizumab efficiently treats pouchitis in a portion of patients and response correlates with dynamic adhesion profiles to MAdCAM-1. CONCLUSION Our data suggest that T cell trafficking seems to be important for the pathogenesis of pouchitis and support the therapeutic use of vedolizumab. Integrin function might serve as a biomarker to predict response to vedolizumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ines Schneider
- Department of Medicine 1, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carol-Immanuel Geppert
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Laura Mühl
- Department of Medicine 1, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Laura Besendorf
- Department of Medicine 1, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Clarissa Allner
- Department of Medicine 1, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Emily Becker
- Department of Medicine 1, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Imke Atreya
- Department of Medicine 1, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany,Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Francesco Vitali
- Department of Medicine 1, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany,Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Raja Atreya
- Department of Medicine 1, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany,Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus F. Neurath
- Department of Medicine 1, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany,Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Karjalainen EK, Renkonen-Sinisalo L, Satokari R, Mustonen H, Ristimäki A, Arkkila P, Lepistö AH. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Chronic Pouchitis: A Randomized, Parallel, Double-Blinded Clinical Trial. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2021; 27:1766-1772. [PMID: 33501942 PMCID: PMC8528148 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izab001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In ulcerative colitis, a pouchitis is the most common long-term adverse effect after proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Approximately 5% of patients develop chronic antibiotic-dependent or antibiotic-refractory pouchitis without any effective treatment. The aim of this trial was to investigate the efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplantation in the treatment of chronic pouchitis. METHODS This was a single-center, double-blinded, parallel group trial comparing donor fecal microbiota transplantation with placebo (autologous transplant) in chronic pouchitis. Twenty-six patients were recruited at the Helsinki University Hospital between December 2017 and August 2018 and were randomly allocated a 1:1 ratio to either donor fecal microbiota transplantation or placebo. The protocol included 2 transplantations into the pouch on weeks 0 and 4, and patients were followed up for 52 weeks. RESULTS Nine patients in the intervention group and 8 patients in the placebo group relapsed during the 52-week follow-up, and the relapse-free survival did not differ between the groups (P = 0.183, log-rank; hazard ratio, 1.90 [95% confidence interval, 0.73-4.98; P = 0.190]). In the subgroup analysis of patients using continuous antibiotics before the study, the relapse-free survival was shorter in the intervention group (P = 0.004, log-rank; hazard ratio, 13.08 [95% confidence interval, 1.47-116.60; P = 0.021]). No major adverse effects were reported. CONCLUSIONS The fecal microbiota transplantation treatment regime used in our study was not effective in the treatment of chronic pouchitis. The safety profile of fecal microbiota transplantation was good. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER NCT03378921.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Essi K Karjalainen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Laura Renkonen-Sinisalo
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- Genome-Scale Biology Research Program, Research Programs Unit, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Reetta Satokari
- Human Microbiome Research Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Harri Mustonen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ari Ristimäki
- Department of Pathology, Medicum, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- HUS Diagnostic Center, HUSLAB, Pathology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- Applied Tumor Genomics Research Program, Research Programs Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Perttu Arkkila
- Department of Gastroenterology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Anna H Lepistö
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- Genome-Scale Biology Research Program, Research Programs Unit, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Raine T, Verstockt B, Kopylov U, Karmiris K, Goldberg R, Atreya R, Burisch J, Burke J, Ellul P, Hedin C, Holubar SD, Katsanos K, Lobaton T, Schmidt C, Cullen G. ECCO Topical Review: Refractory Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J Crohns Colitis 2021; 15:1605-1620. [PMID: 34160593 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease is a chronic disease with variable degrees of extent, severity, and activity. A proportion of patients will have disease that is refractory to licensed therapies, resulting in significant impairment in quality of life. The treatment of these patients involves a systematic approach by the entire multidisciplinary team, with particular consideration given to medical options including unlicensed therapies, surgical interventions, and dietetic and psychological support. The purpose of this review is to guide clinicians through this process and provide an accurate summary of the available evidence for different strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Raine
- Department of Gastroenterology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Bram Verstockt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, TARGID - IBD, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Uri Kopylov
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | | | - Rimma Goldberg
- Department of Gastroenterology, Monash Health and School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Raja Atreya
- Department of Medicine 1, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Johan Burisch
- Gastrounit, Medical Division, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - John Burke
- Colorectal and General Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Pierre Ellul
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta
| | - Charlotte Hedin
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Medicine Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
- Karolinska University Hospital, Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Dermatovenereology and Rheumatology, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Stefan D Holubar
- Department of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Konstantinos Katsanos
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University and Medical School of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Triana Lobaton
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Carsten Schmidt
- Medical Faculty of the Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany
| | - Garret Cullen
- Centre for Colorectal Disease, St Vincent's University Hospital and School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Gastroenterology, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Shen B, Kochhar GS, Kariv R, Liu X, Navaneethan U, Rubin DT, Cross RK, Sugita A, D'Hoore A, Schairer J, Farraye FA, Kiran RP, Fleshner P, Rosh J, Shah SA, Chang S, Scherl E, Pardi DS, Schwartz DA, Kotze PG, Bruining DH, Kane SV, Philpott J, Abraham B, Segal J, Sedano R, Kayal M, Bentley-Hibbert S, Tarabar D, El-Hachem S, Sehgal P, McCormick JT, Picoraro JA, Silverberg MS, Bernstein CN, Sandborn WJ, Vermeire S. Diagnosis and classification of ileal pouch disorders: consensus guidelines from the International Ileal Pouch Consortium. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 6:826-849. [PMID: 34416186 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(21)00101-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Revised: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is an option for most patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis who require colectomy. Although the construction of an ileal pouch substantially improves patients' health-related quality of life, the surgery is, directly or indirectly, associated with various structural, inflammatory, and functional adverse sequelae. Furthermore, the surgical procedure does not completely abolish the risk for neoplasia. Patients with ileal pouches often present with extraintestinal, systemic inflammatory conditions. The International Ileal Pouch Consortium was established to create this consensus document on the diagnosis and classification of ileal pouch disorders using available evidence and the panellists' expertise. In a given individual, the condition of the pouch can change over time. Therefore, close monitoring of the activity and progression of the disease is essential to make accurate modifications in the diagnosis and classification in a timely manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Shen
- Center for Interventional Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Columbia University Irving Medical Center-New-York Presbyterian Hospital, NY, USA.
| | - Gursimran S Kochhar
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Revital Kariv
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Xiuli Liu
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University, MO, USA
| | - Udayakumar Navaneethan
- IBD Center and IBD Interventional Unit, Center for Interventional Endoscopy, Orlando Health, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - David T Rubin
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Raymond K Cross
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Program, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Akira Sugita
- Department of Clinical Research and Department of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Yokohama Municipal Citizens Hospital Yokohama, Japan
| | - André D'Hoore
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jason Schairer
- Department of Gastroenterology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Francis A Farraye
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Ravi P Kiran
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center-New-York Presbyterian Hospital, NY, USA
| | - Philip Fleshner
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, University of California-Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Joel Rosh
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Goryeb Children's Hospital-Atlantic Health, Morristown, NJ, USA
| | - Samir A Shah
- Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Miriam Hospital, Gastroenterology Associates, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Shannon Chang
- Division of Gastroenterology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ellen Scherl
- New York Presbyterian Hospital, Jill Roberts Center for IBD, Weill Cornell Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, New York, NY, USA
| | - Darrell S Pardi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - David A Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Paulo G Kotze
- IBD Outpatients Clinic, Catholic University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
| | - David H Bruining
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Sunanda V Kane
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jessica Philpott
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Bincy Abraham
- Houston Methodist and Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jonathan Segal
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hillingdon Hospital, Uxbridge, UK
| | - Rocio Sedano
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Maia Kayal
- Department of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Stuart Bentley-Hibbert
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center-New-York Presbyterian Hospital, NY, USA
| | - Dino Tarabar
- IBD Clinical Center, University Hospital Center Dr Dragiša Mišović, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Sandra El-Hachem
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Priya Sehgal
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University Irving Medical Center-New-York Presbyterian Hospital, NY, USA
| | - James T McCormick
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Joseph A Picoraro
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center-Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark S Silverberg
- Mount Sinai Hospital Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Charles N Bernstein
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clinical and Research Centre, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - William J Sandborn
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Séverine Vermeire
- Department of Gastroenterology, University hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Holubar SD, Lightner AL, Poylin V, Vogel JD, Gaertner W, Davis B, Davis KG, Mahadevan U, Shah SA, Kane SV, Steele SR, Paquette IM, Feingold DL. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Ulcerative Colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 2021; 64:783-804. [PMID: 33853087 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan D Holubar
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Amy L Lightner
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Vitaliy Poylin
- McGaw Medical Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jon D Vogel
- Colorectal Surgery Section, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Wolfgang Gaertner
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Bradley Davis
- Colon and Rectal Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | | | - Uma Mahadevan
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Samir A Shah
- Department of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Sunanda V Kane
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Scott R Steele
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Ian M Paquette
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Daniel L Feingold
- Section of Colorectal Surgery, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Safety and Efficacy of Biological Therapy in Chronic Antibiotic Refractory Pouchitis: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2021; 55:481-491. [PMID: 34049383 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pouchitis is the most common long-term complication after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis. Those with ≥3 episodes of pouchitis/year and symptoms despite antibiotics are considered to have chronic antibiotic refractory pouchitis (CARP). While several agents including probiotics, steroids and immunomodulators have been used, treatment of CARP remains challenging. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the safety and efficacy of various biological agents in treatment of CARP. METHODS Multiple databases were searched through June 2020 for studies that reported the efficacy and safety of biological therapy including antitumor necrosis factor-alpha agents [infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADA)], vedolizumab (VDZ), and ustekinumab in CARP. We excluded studies on Crohn's like and/or other inflammatory complications of the pouch. Meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled rates of clinical as well as endoscopic improvement and remission. RESULTS We included 15 studies with 311 patients in our final analysis. Ninety-two patients were treated with IFX, 42 with ADA, 144 with VDZ and 33 with ustekinumab. Pooled rate of clinical improvement was 71.4%, 58.2%, 47.9% and clinical remission was 65.7%, 31%, 47.4% with IFX, ADA, and VDZ, respectively. Pooled rate of endoscopic improvement was achieved in 61.2% patients treated with VDZ while endoscopic remission was achieved in 70.3% patients treated with IFX. Adverse events were reported in 3.9% patients. CONCLUSION Biologic therapy is safe and effective in the treatment of CARP.
Collapse
|
20
|
Rabbenou W, Chang S. Medical treatment of pouchitis: a guide for the clinician. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2021; 14:17562848211023376. [PMID: 34249146 PMCID: PMC8239975 DOI: 10.1177/17562848211023376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Pouchitis is the most common complication in patients who have undergone restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). Up to 81% of IPAA patients experience pouchitis, with 40% of patients presenting within the first year of surgery. Common risk factors include genetic mutations, extensive colitis, rheumatologic disorders, and primary sclerosing cholangitis. Currently, there are no medications with approved indications for pouchitis. As such, the conventional treatment of pouchitis is entirely off-label. This paper is intended to be a practical and up-to-date review of available therapies used for the management of pouchitis. The mainstay of treatment for acute pouchitis remains antibiotics, but newer therapeutics have also shown promise in the treatment of chronic pouchitis. Common lifestyle considerations that may play a role in pouchitis are also reviewed. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Medical treatment of pouchitis: a guide for the clinician The ileal pouch-anal anastomosis ("pouch") is the most common way patients who require surgery to remove their colon are able to avoid a permanent ileostomy ("ostomy"). This pouch, created from the small intestines, serves as a reservoir to hold stool. The most common complication after pouch surgery is pouchitis. Pouchitis symptoms include more frequent bowel movements, urgency to defecate, blood in the stool, incontinence, and abdominal pain. This paper is intended to be a practical review of available therapies including medications and lifestyle changes that can be considered for the management of acute pouchitis, chronic pouchitis, and cuffitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy Rabbenou
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shannon Chang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, New York University Langone Medical Center, 305 E 33rd Street, New York, NY 10016, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hasan B, Yim Y, Ur Rashid M, Khalid RA, Sarvepalli D, Castaneda D, Ur Rahman A, Palekar N, Charles R, Castro FJ, Shen B. Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Chronic Inflammatory Conditions of the Pouch. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2021; 27:965-970. [PMID: 32944766 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izaa245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pouchitis can be a chronic complication of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) for chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis (CARP) and other inflammatory conditions of the pouch. METHODS This was a retrospective case series of adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who underwent ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and then developed CARP and received HBOT between January 2015 and October 2019. A modified Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (mPDAI) score was used to quantify subjective symptoms (0-6) and endoscopic findings (0-6) before and after HBOT. RESULTS A total of 46 patients were included, with 23 (50.0%) being males with a mean age of 43.6 ± 12.9 years. The median number of HBOT sessions was 30 (range 10-60). There was a significant reduction in the mean mPDAI symptom subscore from 3.19 to 1.91 after HBOT (P < 0.05). The pre- and post-HBOT mean mPDAI endoscopy subscores for the afferent limb were 2.31 ± 1.84 and 0.85 ± 1.28 (P = 0.006); for the pouch body, 2.34 ± 1.37 and 1.29 ± 1.38 (P < 0.001); and for the cuff, 1.93 ± 1.11 and 0.63 ± 1.12 (P < 0.001), respectively. Transient side effects included ear barotrauma in 5 patients (10.9%) and hyperbaric myopic vision changes in 5 patients (10.9%). CONCLUSIONS Despite minor adverse events, HBOT was well tolerated in patients with CARP and significantly improved symptoms and endoscopic parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Badar Hasan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
| | - Yunjoo Yim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
| | | | - Rumman A Khalid
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
| | | | - Daniel Castaneda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
| | - Asad Ur Rahman
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
| | - Nicole Palekar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
| | - Roger Charles
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
| | - Fernando J Castro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
| | - Bo Shen
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center-New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Outtier A, Ferrante M. Chronic Antibiotic-Refractory Pouchitis: Management Challenges. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 2021; 14:277-290. [PMID: 34163205 PMCID: PMC8213947 DOI: 10.2147/ceg.s219556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Pouchitis is the most common long-term complication in patients with ulcerative colitis who underwent restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. The incidence of acute pouchitis is 20% after 1 year and up to 40% after 5 years. Chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis develops in approximately 10% of patients. Aim To present a narrative review of published literature regarding the management of chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis. Methods Current relevant literature was summarized and critically evaluated. Results Clear definitions should be used to classify pouchitis into acute versus chronic, and responsive versus dependent versus refractory to antibiotics. Before treatment is started for chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis, secondary causes should be ruled out. There is a need for validated scoring systems to measure the severity of the disease. Because chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis is a rare condition, only small studies with often a poor study design have been performed. Treatments with antibiotics, aminosalicylates, steroids, immunomodulators and biologics have shown to be effective and safe for chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis. Also, treatments with AST-120, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, tacrolimus enemas, and granulocyte and monocyte apheresis suggested some efficacy. Conclusion The available data are weak but suggest that therapeutic options for chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis are similar to the treatment strategies for inflammatory bowel diseases. However, randomized controlled trials are warranted to further identify the best treatment options in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- An Outtier
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marc Ferrante
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Devlin JC, Axelrad J, Hine AM, Chang S, Sarkar S, Lin JD, Ruggles KV, Hudesman D, Cadwell K, Loke P. Single-Cell Transcriptional Survey of Ileal-Anal Pouch Immune Cells From Ulcerative Colitis Patients. Gastroenterology 2021; 160:1679-1693. [PMID: 33359089 PMCID: PMC8327835 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.12.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Revised: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is a surgical procedure in patients with ulcerative colitis refractory to medical therapies. Pouchitis, the most common complication, is inflammation of the pouch of unknown etiology. To define how the intestinal immune system is distinctly organized during pouchitis, we analyzed tissues from patients with and without pouchitis and from patients with ulcerative colitis using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq). METHODS We examined pouch lamina propria CD45+ hematopoietic cells from intestinal tissues of ulcerative colitis patients with (n = 15) and without an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (n = 11). Further in silico meta-analysis was performed to generate transcriptional interaction networks and identify biomarkers for patients with inflamed pouches. RESULTS In addition to tissue-specific signatures, we identified a population of IL1B/LYZ+ myeloid cells and FOXP3/BATF+ T cells that distinguish inflamed tissues, which we further validated in other scRNA-seq datasets from patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Cell-type-specific transcriptional markers obtained from scRNA-seq was used to infer representation from bulk RNA sequencing datasets, which further implicated myeloid cells expressing IL1B and S100A8/A9 calprotectin as interacting with stromal cells, and Bacteroidales and Clostridiales bacterial taxa. We found that nonresponsiveness to anti-integrin biologic therapies in patients with ulcerative colitis was associated with the signature of IL1B+/LYZ+ myeloid cells in a subset of patients. CONCLUSIONS Features of intestinal inflammation during pouchitis and ulcerative colitis are similar, which may have clinical implications for the management of pouchitis. scRNA-seq enables meta-analysis of multiple studies, which may facilitate the identification of biomarkers to personalize therapy for patients with IBD. The processed single cell count tables are provided in Gene Expression Omnibus; GSE162335. Raw sequence data are not public and are protected by controlled-access for patient privacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph C. Devlin
- Department of Microbiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA,Sackler Institute of Graduate Biomedical Sciences, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA,Institute of Systems Genetics, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Jordan Axelrad
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Ashley M. Hine
- Department of Microbiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Shannon Chang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Suparna Sarkar
- Department of Pathology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Jian-Da Lin
- Department of Microbiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA,Skirball Institute of Biomedical Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Kelly V. Ruggles
- Division of Translational Medicine, Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA,Institute of Systems Genetics, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - David Hudesman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Ken Cadwell
- Department of Microbiology; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine; Skirball Institute of Biomedical Medicine.
| | - P’ng Loke
- Department of Microbiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA,Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ribaldone DG, Pellicano R, Saracco GM, Morino M, Astegiano M. Vedolizumab for treatment of chronic refractory pouchitis: a systematic review with pool analysis. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS 2021; 112:59-63. [PMID: 31823641 DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6336/2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES about 1%-2% of patients with chronic refractory pouchitis, in the context of ulcerative colitis, end up with a permanent ileostomy. The aim of this systematic review was to collect all published studies involving patients treated with vedolizumab for chronic refractory or antibiotic-dependent pouchitis and then pool the data regarding the effectiveness of this therapeutic strategy. METHODS a MEDLINE and Web of Science search of all studies published in English until March 17, 2019 was conducted using the terms "vedolizumab and pouchitis". RESULTS seven studies with a total of 44 patients with chronic pouchitis were included. Twenty-three out of 44 patients (52.3%) had undergone previous treatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) drugs. At week 12, 33 out of 44 patients (75%) reported clinical improvement. Endoscopic improvement, evaluated within 6 months of the start of vedolizumab therapy, was obtained in 28 out of the 38 patients in whom such data were available (73.7%). CONCLUSIONS this first systematic review published in the literature on this issue suggests that vedolizumab has significant efficacy in chronic refractory or antibiotic-dependent pouchitis, also in patients who failed to respond to other treatments including those with anti-TNF agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Giuseppe Ribaldone
- General and Specialistic Medicine/Gastroenterology, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Marco Astegiano
- Gastroenterologia-U, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, C.so Bramante 88, 10126 Turin, It
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Akiyama S, Rai V, Rubin DT. Pouchitis in inflammatory bowel disease: a review of diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Intest Res 2020; 19:1-11. [PMID: 33138344 PMCID: PMC7873408 DOI: 10.5217/ir.2020.00047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) occasionally need a restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) because of medically refractory colitis or dysplasia/cancer. However, pouchitis may develop in up to 70% of patients after this procedure and significantly impair quality of life, more so if the inflammation becomes a chronic condition. About 10% of patients with IBD who develop pouchitis require pouch excision, and several risk factors of the failure have been reported. A phenotype that has features similar to Crohn’s disease may develop in a subset of ulcerative colitis patients following proctocolectomy with IPAA and is the most frequent reason for pouch failure. In this review, we discuss the diagnosis and prognosis of pouchitis, risk factors for pouchitis development, and treatment options for pouchitis, including the newer biological agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shintaro Akiyama
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Victoria Rai
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - David T Rubin
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
Total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the surgical procedure of choice for patients with medically-refractory ulcerative colitis or ulcerative colitis with associated dysplasia. Although most patients after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis experience good functional outcomes, a number of complications may develop. Of the long-term complications, pouchitis is most common. Although most respond to antibiotic treatment, some patients develop chronic pouchitis, leading to substantial morbidity and occasionally pouch failure. In patients with pouchitis who are not responsive to conventional antimicrobial therapy, secondary causes of chronic pouchitis need to be considered, including Crohn's disease of the pouch. In recent years, more literature has become available regarding the medical management of chronic pouchitis and Crohn's disease of the pouch, including the use of newer biologic agents. We herein provide a concise review on inflammatory complications involving the ileal pouch, including a focused approach to diagnosis and medical management.
Collapse
|
27
|
Barreiro-de Acosta M, Marín-Jimenez I, Rodríguez-Lago I, Guarner F, Espín E, Ferrer Bradley I, Gutiérrez A, Beltrán B, Chaparro M, Gisbert JP, Nos P. Recommendations of the Spanish Working Group on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis (GETECCU) on pouchitis in ulcerative colitis. Part 2: Treatment. GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA 2020; 43:649-658. [PMID: 32600917 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2020.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2020] [Revised: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Pouchitis treatment is a complex entity that requires a close medical and surgical relationship. The elective treatment for acute pouchitis is antibiotics. After a first episode of pouchitis it is recommended prophylaxis therapy with a probiotic mix, nevertheless it is not clear the use of this formulation for preventing a first episode of pouchitis after surgery. First-line treatment for chronic pouchitis is an antibiotic combination. The next step in treatment should be oral budesonide. Selected cases of severe, chronic refractory pouchitis may benefit from biologic agents, and anti-TNF α should be recommended as the first option, leaving the new biologicals for multi-refractory patients. Permanent ileostomy may be an option in severe refractory cases to medical treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Barreiro-de Acosta
- Unidad EII, Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, España.
| | - Ignacio Marín-Jimenez
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, España
| | - Iago Rodríguez-Lago
- Unidad de EII, Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital de Galdakao, Galdakao, España; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Biocruces Bizkaia, Barakaldo, España
| | - Francisco Guarner
- Grupo de Fisiología y Fisiopatología Digestiva, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, España
| | - Eloy Espín
- Unidad de Cirugía Colorrectal, Servicio de Cirugía General, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, España
| | | | - Ana Gutiérrez
- Servicio de Medicina Digestiva, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, España; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España
| | - Belén Beltrán
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España; Unidad de EII, Servicio de Medicina Digestiva, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, España
| | - María Chaparro
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España; Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, España
| | - Javier P Gisbert
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España; Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, España
| | - Pilar Nos
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España; Unidad de EII, Servicio de Medicina Digestiva, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, España
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Kayal M, Plietz M, Rizvi A, Radcliffe M, Riggs A, Yzet C, Tixier E, Trivedi P, Ungaro RC, Khaitov S, Sylla P, Greenstein A, Frederic Colombel J, Dubinsky MC. Inflammatory Pouch Conditions Are Common After Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis in Ulcerative Colitis Patients. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2020; 26:1079-1086. [PMID: 31587035 PMCID: PMC7456971 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izz227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Total proctocolectomy (TPC) with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the gold standard surgery for ulcerative colitis (UC) patients with medically refractory disease. The aim of this study was to report the rates and risk factors of inflammatory pouch conditions. METHODS This was a retrospective review of UC or IBD unspecified (IBDU) patients who underwent TPC with IPAA for refractory disease or dysplasia between 2008 and 2017. Pouchoscopy data were used to calculate rates of inflammatory pouch conditions. Factors associated with outcomes in univariable analysis were investigated in multivariable analysis. RESULTS Of the 621 patients more than 18 years of age who underwent TPC with IPAA between January 2008 and December 2017, pouchoscopy data were available for 386 patients during a median follow-up period of 4 years. Acute pouchitis occurred in 205 patients (53%), 60 of whom (30%) progressed to chronic pouchitis. Cuffitis and Crohn's disease-like condition (CDLC) of the pouch occurred in 119 (30%) patients and 46 (12%) patients, respectively. In multivariable analysis, female sex was associated with a decreased risk of acute pouchitis, and pre-operative steroid use and medically refractory disease were associated with an increased risk; IBDU was associated with chronic pouchitis; rectal cuff length ≥2 cm and medically refractory disease were associated with cuffitis; age 45-54 at colectomy was associated with CDLC. Rates of pouch failure were similar in chronic pouchitis and CDLC patients treated with biologics and those who were not. CONCLUSIONS Inflammatory pouch conditions are common. Biologic use for chronic pouchitis and CDLC does not impact the rate of pouch failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maia Kayal
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA,Address correspondence to: Maia Kayal, MD The Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA. E-mail:
| | - Michael Plietz
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Anam Rizvi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Marlana Radcliffe
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Alexa Riggs
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Clara Yzet
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Emily Tixier
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Parth Trivedi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ryan C Ungaro
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sergey Khaitov
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Patricia Sylla
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Alexander Greenstein
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jean Frederic Colombel
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Marla C Dubinsky
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Barreiro-de Acosta M, Bastón-Rey I, Calviño-Suárez C, Enrique Domínguez-Muñoz J. Pouchitis: Treatment dilemmas at different stages of the disease. United European Gastroenterol J 2020; 8:256-262. [PMID: 32213019 DOI: 10.1177/2050640619900571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Pouchitis is a frequent complication in ulcerative colitis patients after proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. It is an unspecific inflammation of the pouch with unknown aetiology. First-line treatment for acute and chronic pouchitis is antibiotics. Some cases of severe chronic refractory pouchitis may benefit from biological treatment. Anti-tumour necrosis factor should be recommended as the first option, leaving the new biologicals for multirefractory patients. Permanent ileostomy may be an option in severe cases, after failure of medical treatment. Prophylaxis therapy with a probiotic mixture is recommended after the first episode of pouchitis, whereas it is not clear whether probiotics are useful for all patients after surgery. Here, we present a case report and review the treatment options in different forms of pouchitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Iria Bastón-Rey
- Gastroenterology Department, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Pellino G, Keller DS, Sampietro GM, Carvello M, Celentano V, Coco C, Colombo F, Geccherle A, Luglio G, Rottoli M, Scarpa M, Sciaudone G, Sica G, Sofo L, Zinicola R, Leone S, Danese S, Spinelli A, Delaini G, Selvaggi F. Inflammatory bowel disease position statement of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR): ulcerative colitis. Tech Coloproctol 2020; 24:397-419. [PMID: 32124113 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-020-02175-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Accepted: 02/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR) promoted the project reported here, which consists of a Position Statement of Italian colorectal surgeons to address the surgical aspects of ulcerative colitis management. Members of the society were invited to express their opinions on several items proposed by the writing committee, based on evidence available in the literature. The results are presented, focusing on relevant points. The present paper is not an alternative to available guidelines; rather, it offers a snapshot of the attitudes of SICCR surgeons about the surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis. The committee was able to identify some points of major disagreement and suggested strategies to improve the quality of available data and acceptance of guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Pellino
- Colorectal Surgery, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Degli Studi Della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Policlinico CS, Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - D S Keller
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - M Carvello
- Colon and Rectal Surgery Division, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - V Celentano
- Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK.,University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
| | - C Coco
- UOC Chirurgia Generale 2, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - F Colombo
- L. Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - A Geccherle
- IBD Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria, Negrar Di Valpolicella, VR, Italy
| | - G Luglio
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - M Rottoli
- Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Sant'Orsola Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - M Scarpa
- General Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Di Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - G Sciaudone
- Colorectal Surgery, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Degli Studi Della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Policlinico CS, Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - G Sica
- Minimally Invasive and Gastro-Intestinal Unit, Department of Surgery, Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - L Sofo
- Abdominal Surgery Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - R Zinicola
- Department of Emergency Surgery, University Hospital Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - S Leone
- Associazione Nazionale Per Le Malattie Infiammatorie Croniche Dell'Intestino "A.M.I.C.I. Onlus", Milan, Italy
| | - S Danese
- Division of Gastroenterology, IBD Center, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - A Spinelli
- Colon and Rectal Surgery Division, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - G Delaini
- Department of Surgery, "Pederzoli" Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - F Selvaggi
- Colorectal Surgery, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Degli Studi Della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Policlinico CS, Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138, Naples, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Pouchitis is the most common complication in patients who undergo ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), occurring more frequently in patients with ulcerative colitis. Pouchitis - the inflammation of the pouch - can be due to idiopathic or secondary causes. Chronic antibiotic-dependent pouchitis (CADP) and chronic antibiotic-resistant pouchitis (CARP) are the most difficult forms of chronic idiopathic pouchitis to treat. Crohn's disease of the pouch may develop de novo in ulcerative colitis patients following colectomy with IPAA. It carries a high risk for pouch failure, and its diagnosis and management are challenging. The purpose of this review is to illustrate the present trends in the diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic pouchitis and Crohn's disease of the pouch. RECENT FINDINGS The use of the newer biologic agents, vedolizumab and ustekinumab, has shown promising results in patients with CADP, CARP, and Crohn's disease of the pouch. Fecal microbiota transplantation has also been reported to have encouraging preliminary results in small studies and case series for the treatment of chronic pouchitis. SUMMARY Promising new treatments are emerging for difficult-to-treat forms of pouchitis. Larger prospective and head-to-head comparative studies among the various treatments are needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these agents across the pouchitis subgroups, and to identify predictors of response.
Collapse
|
32
|
Ustekinumab Is Effective for the Treatment of Chronic Antibiotic-Refractory Pouchitis. Dig Dis Sci 2019; 64:3596-3601. [PMID: 31187322 PMCID: PMC6858501 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-019-05697-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2019] [Accepted: 06/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis (CARP) occurs in up to 15% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) following proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). AIM To investigate the effectiveness of ustekinumab in the treatment of CARP. METHODS This was a retrospective single-center study of UC patients with an IPAA, who subsequently developed CARP and received ustekinumab with standard Crohn's disease (CD) dosing between 2016 and 2018. Patients with CD of the pouch were excluded. Demographic, clinical, and endoscopic data were collected. Outcomes included a change in the endoscopic subscore of the Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (PDAI), change in the ulcerated surface area, clinical response, and the number of bowel movements per 24 h. RESULTS Twenty-four patients with CARP were included for analysis. Median follow-up time was 12.9 months (IQR 7.9-16). Twelve patients (50%) had a clinical response with the median number of bowel movements within 24 h decreasing from 8 (IQR, 5-12) to 6 (IQR, 5-8) P = 0.002. Thirteen patients had pouchoscopies available post-ustekinumab treatment. In these patients, the median endoscopic subscore of the PDAI decreased from 5 (IQR, 3-6) to 4 (IQR, 2-5), P = 0.016. Likewise, among these thirteen patients, nine (69%) had an ulcerated surface area > 10% before ustekinumab treatment; after treatment with ustekinumab, only four patients (31%) still had an ulcerated surface area of > 10%. CONCLUSIONS This is the largest study of ustekinumab treatment for patients with chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis. We found that ustekinumab therapy led to the improvement in clinical and endoscopic endpoints.
Collapse
|
33
|
Lamb CA, Kennedy NA, Raine T, Hendy PA, Smith PJ, Limdi JK, Hayee B, Lomer MCE, Parkes GC, Selinger C, Barrett KJ, Davies RJ, Bennett C, Gittens S, Dunlop MG, Faiz O, Fraser A, Garrick V, Johnston PD, Parkes M, Sanderson J, Terry H, Gaya DR, Iqbal TH, Taylor SA, Smith M, Brookes M, Hansen R, Hawthorne AB. British Society of Gastroenterology consensus guidelines on the management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults. Gut 2019; 68:s1-s106. [PMID: 31562236 PMCID: PMC6872448 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1196] [Impact Index Per Article: 239.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2019] [Revised: 06/10/2019] [Accepted: 06/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease are the principal forms of inflammatory bowel disease. Both represent chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract, which displays heterogeneity in inflammatory and symptomatic burden between patients and within individuals over time. Optimal management relies on understanding and tailoring evidence-based interventions by clinicians in partnership with patients. This guideline for management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults over 16 years of age was developed by Stakeholders representing UK physicians (British Society of Gastroenterology), surgeons (Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland), specialist nurses (Royal College of Nursing), paediatricians (British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition), dietitians (British Dietetic Association), radiologists (British Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology), general practitioners (Primary Care Society for Gastroenterology) and patients (Crohn's and Colitis UK). A systematic review of 88 247 publications and a Delphi consensus process involving 81 multidisciplinary clinicians and patients was undertaken to develop 168 evidence- and expert opinion-based recommendations for pharmacological, non-pharmacological and surgical interventions, as well as optimal service delivery in the management of both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Comprehensive up-to-date guidance is provided regarding indications for, initiation and monitoring of immunosuppressive therapies, nutrition interventions, pre-, peri- and postoperative management, as well as structure and function of the multidisciplinary team and integration between primary and secondary care. Twenty research priorities to inform future clinical management are presented, alongside objective measurement of priority importance, determined by 2379 electronic survey responses from individuals living with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, including patients, their families and friends.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Andrew Lamb
- Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Nicholas A Kennedy
- Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
- University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Tim Raine
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS FoundationTrust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Philip Anthony Hendy
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Philip J Smith
- Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Jimmy K Limdi
- The Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
- University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Bu'Hussain Hayee
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- King's College London, London, UK
| | - Miranda C E Lomer
- King's College London, London, UK
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Gareth C Parkes
- Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
- Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
| | - Christian Selinger
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
- University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - R Justin Davies
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS FoundationTrust, Cambridge, UK
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Cathy Bennett
- Systematic Research Ltd, Quorn, UK
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Malcolm G Dunlop
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Omar Faiz
- Imperial College London, London, UK
- St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK
| | - Aileen Fraser
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | | | | | - Miles Parkes
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS FoundationTrust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jeremy Sanderson
- King's College London, London, UK
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Daniel R Gaya
- Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
- University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Tariq H Iqbal
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham NHSFoundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Stuart A Taylor
- University College London, London, UK
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Melissa Smith
- Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - Matthew Brookes
- Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
- University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Richard Hansen
- Royal Hospital for Children Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
- University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Kayal M, Plietz M, Radcliffe M, Rizvi A, Yzet C, Tixier E, Hirten RP, Cohen B, Sylla P, Khaitov S, Greenstein A, Colombel JF, Dubinsky MC, Ungaro RC. Endoscopic activity in asymptomatic patients with an ileal pouch is associated with an increased risk of pouchitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2019; 50:1189-1194. [PMID: 31579976 PMCID: PMC7050830 DOI: 10.1111/apt.15505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2019] [Revised: 07/16/2019] [Accepted: 08/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The significance of endoscopic activity in asymptomatic ulcerative colitis (UC) patients with an ileal pouch is unknown. AIM To investigate the association of endoscopic pouch activity in asymptomatic patients with the subsequent development of pouchitis. METHODS We analyzed a retrospective cohort of patients with UC or IBD-unspecified who underwent a total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA). Asymptomatic patients with a Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (PDAI) symptom sub-score of zero who underwent an index surveillance pouchoscopy were included. Endoscopic pouch body activity was graded as 0: normal, 1: mucosal inflammation, or 2: mucosal breaks (ulcers and/or erosions). The primary outcome was primary acute idiopathic pouchitis defined as PDAI score ≥ 7 with symptoms lasting less than four weeks and responsive to standard antibiotics, not otherwise meeting criteria for secondary pouchitis. The secondary outcome was chronic idiopathic pouchitis defined as PDAI score ≥ 7 with symptoms lasting greater than four weeks despite standard antibiotics. Predictors of pouchitis were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods with hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) reported. RESULTS 143 asymptomatic pouch patients were included. Index endoscopic pouch body activity was 0 in 86 (60.1%) patients, 1 in 26 (18.2%) and 2 in 31 (21.7%). The median length of follow-up after index surveillance pouchoscopy was 3.03 [IQR 1.24-4.60] years. Primary acute idiopathic pouchitis occurred in 44 (31%) patients and chronic idiopathic pouchitis in 12 (8.4%). Grade 2 endoscopic pouch activity was associated with the development of acute pouchitis (HR 2.39, 95% CI 1.23-4.67), although not chronic pouchitis (HR 1.76, 95% CI 0.53-5.87). Histologic inflammation in endoscopically normal pouch mucosa was not associated with acute or chronic pouchitis. CONCLUSIONS Mucosal breaks are present in nearly a quarter of asymptomatic patients with IPAA and are associated with an increased risk of acute pouchitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maia Kayal
- Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Michael Plietz
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Marlana Radcliffe
- Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Anam Rizvi
- Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Clara Yzet
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France
| | - Emily Tixier
- Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Robert P. Hirten
- Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Benjamin Cohen
- Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Patricia Sylla
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Sergey Khaitov
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Alexander Greenstein
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Jean-Frederic Colombel
- Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Marla C. Dubinsky
- Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Ryan C. Ungaro
- Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease are the principal forms of inflammatory bowel disease. Both represent chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract, which displays heterogeneity in inflammatory and symptomatic burden between patients and within individuals over time. Optimal management relies on understanding and tailoring evidence-based interventions by clinicians in partnership with patients. This guideline for management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults over 16 years of age was developed by Stakeholders representing UK physicians (British Society of Gastroenterology), surgeons (Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland), specialist nurses (Royal College of Nursing), paediatricians (British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition), dietitians (British Dietetic Association), radiologists (British Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology), general practitioners (Primary Care Society for Gastroenterology) and patients (Crohn's and Colitis UK). A systematic review of 88 247 publications and a Delphi consensus process involving 81 multidisciplinary clinicians and patients was undertaken to develop 168 evidence- and expert opinion-based recommendations for pharmacological, non-pharmacological and surgical interventions, as well as optimal service delivery in the management of both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Comprehensive up-to-date guidance is provided regarding indications for, initiation and monitoring of immunosuppressive therapies, nutrition interventions, pre-, peri- and postoperative management, as well as structure and function of the multidisciplinary team and integration between primary and secondary care. Twenty research priorities to inform future clinical management are presented, alongside objective measurement of priority importance, determined by 2379 electronic survey responses from individuals living with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, including patients, their families and friends.
Collapse
|
36
|
Nguyen N, Zhang B, Holubar SD, Pardi DS, Singh S. Treatment and prevention of pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 11:CD001176. [PMID: 31785173 PMCID: PMC6885001 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001176.pub5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pouchitis occurs in approximately 50% of patients following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for chronic ulcerative colitis (UC). OBJECTIVES The primary objective was to determine the efficacy and safety of medical therapies for prevention or treatment of acute or chronic pouchitis. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL from inception to 25 July 2018. We also searched references, trials registers, and conference proceedings. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomized controlled trials of prevention or treatment of acute or chronic pouchitis in adults who underwent IPAA for UC were considered for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently screened studies for eligibility, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated using GRADE. The primary outcome was clinical improvement or remission in participants with acute or chronic pouchitis, or the proportion of participants with no episodes of pouchitis after IPAA. Adverse events (AEs) was a secondary outcome. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for each dichotomous outcome. MAIN RESULTS Fifteen studies (547 participants) were included. Four studies assessed treatment of acute pouchitis. Five studies assessed treatment of chronic pouchitis. Six studies assessed prevention of pouchitis. Three studies were low risk of bias. Three studies were high risk of bias and the other studies were unclear. Acute pouchitis: All ciprofloxacin participants (7/7) achieved remission at two weeks compared to 33% (3/9) of metronidazole participants (RR 2.68, 95% CI 1.13 to 6.35, very low certainty evidence). No ciprofloxacin participants (0/7) had an AE compared to 33% (3/9) of metronidazole participants (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.98; very low certainty evidence). AEs included vomiting, dysgeusia or transient peripheral neuropathy. Forty-three per cent (6/14) of metronidazole participants achieved remission at 6 weeks compared to 50% (6/12) of budesonide enema participants (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.96, very low certainty evidence). Fifty per cent (7/14) of metronidazole participants improved clinically at 6 weeks compared to 58% (7/12) of budesonide enema participants (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.74, very low certainty evidence). Fifty-seven per cent (8/14) of metronidazole participants had an AE compared to 25% (3/12) of budesonide enema participants (RR 2.29, 95% CI 0.78 to 6.73, very low certainty evidence). AEs included anorexia, nausea, headache, asthenia, metallic taste, vomiting, paraesthesia, and depression. Twenty-five per cent (2/8) of rifaximin participants achieved remission at 4 weeks compared to 0% (0/10) of placebo participants (RR 6.11, 95% CI 0.33 to 111.71, very low certainty evidence). Thirty-eight per cent (3/8) of rifaximin participants improved clinically at 4 weeks compared to 30% (3/10) of placebo participants (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.34 to 4.60, very low certainty evidence). Seventy-five per cent (6/8) of rifaximin participants had an AE compared to 50% (5/10) of placebo participants (RR 1.50, 95% CI 0.72 to 3.14, very low certainty evidence). AEs included diarrhea, flatulence, nausea, proctalgia, vomiting, thirst, candida, upper respiratory tract infection, increased hepatic enzyme, and cluster headache. Ten per cent (1/10) of Lactobacillus GG participants improved clinically at 12 weeks compared to 0% (0/10) of placebo participants (RR 3.00, 95% CI 0.14 to 65.90, very low certainty evidence). Chronic pouchitis: Eighty-five per cent (34/40) of De Simone Formulation (a probiotic formulation) participants maintained remission at 9 to 12 months compared to 3% (1/36) of placebo participants (RR 20.24, 95% CI 4.28 to 95.81, 2 studies; low certainty evidence). Two per cent (1/40) of De Simone Formulation participants had an AE compared to 0% (0/36) of placebo participants (RR 2.43, 95% CI 0.11 to 55.89; low certainty evidence). AEs included abdominal cramps, vomiting and diarrhea. Fifty per cent (3/6) of adalimumab patients achieved clinical improvement at 4 weeks compared to 43% (3/7) of placebo participants (RR, 1.17, 95% CI 0.36 to 3.76, low certainty evidence). Sixty per cent (6/10) of glutamine participants maintained remission at 3 weeks compared to 33% (3/9) of butyrate participants (RR 1.80, 95% CI 0.63 to 5.16, very low certainty evidence). Forty-five per cent (9/20) of patients treated with bismuth carbomer foam enema improved clinically at 3 weeks compared to 45% (9/20) of placebo participants (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.98, very low certainty evidence). Twenty-five per cent (5/20) of participants in the bismuth carbomer foam enema group had an AE compared to 35% (7/20) of placebo participants (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.88, very low certainty evidence). Adverse events included diarrhea, worsening symptoms, cramping, sinusitis, and abdominal pain. PREVENTION At 12 months, 90% (18/20) of De Simone Formulation participants had no episodes of acute pouchitis compared to 60% (12/20) of placebo participants (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.21, low certainty evidence). Another study found 100% (16/16) of De Simone Formulation participants had no episodes of acute pouchitis at 12 months compared to 92% (11/12) of the no treatment control group (RR 1.10, 95% 0.89 to 1.36, very low certainty evidence). Eighty-six per cent (6/7) of Bifidobacterium longum participants had no episodes of acute pouchitis at 6 months compared to 60% (3/5) of placebo participants (RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.66 to 3.11, very low certainty evidence). Eleven per cent (1/9) of Clostridium butyricum MIYAIRI participants had no episodes of acute pouchitis at 24 months compared to 50% (4/8) of placebo participants (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.60, very low certainty evidence). Forty-six per cent (43/94) of allopurinol participants had no episodes of pouchitis at 24 months compared to 43% (39/90) of placebo participants (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.46; low certainty evidence). Eighty-one per cent (21/26) of tinidazole participants had no episodes of pouchitis over 12 months compared to 58% (7/12) of placebo participants (RR 1.38, 95% CI 0.83 to 2.31, very low certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The effects of antibiotics, probiotics and other interventions for treating and preventing pouchitis are uncertain. Well designed, adequately powered studies are needed to determine the optimal therapy for the treatment and prevention of pouchitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nghia Nguyen
- University of California San DiegoDivision of GastroenterologyLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
| | - Bing Zhang
- University of California San FranciscoDivision of GastroenterologySan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Stefan D Holubar
- Cleveland ClinicDepartment of Colon and Rectal SurgeryClevelandOHUSA
| | - Darrell S Pardi
- Mayo ClinicDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology200 First Street SWRochesterMNUSA55905
| | - Siddharth Singh
- University of California San DiegoDivision of GastroenterologyLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
|
38
|
De Novo Crohn's Disease of the Pouch in Children Undergoing Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Ulcerative Colitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2019; 69:455-460. [PMID: 31136563 PMCID: PMC7408293 DOI: 10.1097/mpg.0000000000002406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 10% of children with ulcerative colitis (UC) undergo colectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). We aimed to describe the postoperative outcomes, with an emphasis on chronic pouch inflammation including de novo Crohn disease (CD) at a tertiary care inflammatory bowel disease center. METHODS Electronic medical records of all children who underwent colectomy ≤18 years between 2008 and 2017 were reviewed. Clinical and laboratory data were recorded. Primary outcome was frequency of chronic pouch inflammation including de novo CD. Secondary outcomes included early (≤30 days from index surgery) and late postoperative complications. Descriptive statistics (median and interquartile range) summarized the data and univariate analysis tested associations with outcomes. RESULTS Fifty-eight children underwent colectomy and 56 completed IPAA. Median age at diagnosis was 14 years (12-16.2) and at colectomy 16.2 years (14.2-17.7) with median follow-up of 13 months (5-43). Sixty-six percent underwent 3-stage IPAA and 78% were biologic exposed. Eleven had chronic pouchitis, 73% antibiotic refractory and 25% met criteria for de novo CD by median of 19 months (9-41). A total of 21% and 50% experienced early and late surgical complications, most commonly ileus and recurrent IPAA stricture. The pouch failure rate was 3.6%. Chronic pouch inflammation was associated with a later diagnosis of de novo CD (P = 0.0025). CONCLUSIONS In pediatric UC, CD is not uncommon after IPAA. Chronic pouch inflammation often precedes a diagnosis of de novo CD. Families should be informed of the short- and long-term outcomes in children before UC surgery.
Collapse
|
39
|
Cakir OO. Effectiveness of vedolizumab treatment in two different anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha refractory pouchitis: A case report. World J Clin Cases 2019; 7:2316-2321. [PMID: 31531325 PMCID: PMC6718792 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i16.2316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2019] [Revised: 06/18/2019] [Accepted: 07/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Refractory pouchitis is a common cause of pouch failure, which may require surgical excision of the pouch or permanent diversion. We aimed to show the effect of vedolizumab on treatment of the patient with refractory pouchitis.
CASE SUMMARY A 32-year-old male with pancolonic ulcerative colitis since the age of 25 with primary failure of infliximab and mesalamine and intolerance of azathioprine, underwent a total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in 2012. He developed chronic diarrhea in 2014, which was watery, 30 per day and accompanied with blood and mucus affecting his quality of life.
CONCLUSION Vedolizumab is safe and effective in the management of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha refractory pouchitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ozlem Ozer Cakir
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, School of Medicine, Antalya 07425, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Verstockt B, Claeys C, De Hertogh G, Van Assche G, Wolthuis A, D'Hoore A, Vermeire S, Ferrante M. Outcome of biological therapies in chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis: A retrospective single-centre experience. United European Gastroenterol J 2019; 7:1215-1225. [PMID: 31700634 DOI: 10.1177/2050640619871797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2019] [Accepted: 07/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In limited retrospective series, infliximab, adalimumab and vedolizumab have demonstrated efficacy in chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis. Here, we report single-centre data of all biological therapies in refractory pouchitis. Methods We retrospectively assessed all records from patients with ulcerative colitis and ileal pouch -anal anastomosis who received infliximab, adalimumab or vedolizumab for pouchitis. Clinically relevant remission, defined as a modified Pouchitis Disease Activity Index <5 and a reduction of modified Pouchitis Disease Activity Index ≥2 points from baseline, was assessed at week 14. Results Thirty-three unique patients were identified. Prior to colectomy, patients had been exposed to cyclosporine (n = 14), infliximab (n = 12), adalimumab (n = 3), and/or vedolizumab (n = 3). All developed chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis, for which they received infliximab (n = 23), adalimumab (n = 13) or vedolizumab (n = 15). Clinically relevant remission was observed in 43.5% of patients in the infliximab group, and in 38.5% and 60.0% in the adalimumab and vedolizumab group, respectively. In the long-term, significantly more patients continued vedolizumab compared to anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy (hazard ratio 3.0, p = 0.04). Adverse events (mainly infusion reactions) explained 40.7% of the patients discontinuing anti-TNF therapy, whereas discontinuation of vedolizumab was only related to insufficient efficacy. Four patients eventually required a permanent ileostomy. Conclusion In this case series of chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis, biological therapy was effective in the majority of patients and only a minority eventually required a permanent ileostomy. The use of anti-TNF agents was hampered by a high rate of adverse events, partly related to immunogenicity as some patients had been exposed to anti-TNF prior to colectomy. Vedolizumab was also efficacious and may provide a safe alternative in these chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bram Verstockt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Charlotte Claeys
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gert De Hertogh
- Laboratory of Morphology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gert Van Assche
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Albert Wolthuis
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - André D'Hoore
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Séverine Vermeire
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marc Ferrante
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Gregory M, Weaver KN, Hoversten P, Hicks SB, Patel D, Ciorba MA, Gutierrez AM, Beniwal-Patel P, Palam S, Syal G, Herfarth HH, Christophi G, Raffals L, Barnes EL, Deepak P. Efficacy of Vedolizumab for Refractory Pouchitis of the Ileo-anal Pouch: Results From a Multicenter US Cohort. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2019; 25:1569-1576. [PMID: 30810748 PMCID: PMC6939832 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izz030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2018] [Revised: 12/24/2018] [Accepted: 02/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Inflammation of the pouch after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) can significantly impact quality of life and be difficult to treat. We assessed the effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab in Crohn's disease (CD) of the pouch and chronic antibiotic-dependent or antibiotic-refractory pouchitis. METHODS This was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study at 5 academic referral centers in the United States. Adult patients with endoscopic inflammation of the pouch who received vedolizumab were included. The primary outcome was clinical response at any time point. Secondary outcomes included clinical remission, endoscopic response, and remission. Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis were performed for the effect of the following variables on clinical response: fistula, onset of pouchitis less than 1 year after IPAA, younger than 35 years old, gender, previous tumor necrosis factor inhibitor-alpha use, and BMI >30. RESULTS Eighty-three patients were treated with vedolizumab for inflammation of the pouch between January 2014 and October 2017. Median follow-up was 1.3 years (interquartile range 0.7-2.1). The proportion of patients that achieved at least a clinical response was 71.1%, with 19.3% achieving clinical remission. Of the 74 patients with a follow-up pouchoscopy, the proportion of patients with endoscopic response and mucosal healing was 54.1% and 17.6%, respectively. Patients who developed pouchitis symptoms less than 1 year after undergoing IPAA were less likely to respond to vedolizumab, even after controlling for other risk factors. CONCLUSIONS Vedolizumab is safe and effective in the management of CD of the pouch and chronic pouchitis. Further studies are needed to compare vedolizumab with other biologic therapies for pouchitis and CD of the pouch.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Gregory
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Kimberly N Weaver
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Patrick Hoversten
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Devin Patel
- Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Matthew A Ciorba
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
- Washington University Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Center, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Alexandra M Gutierrez
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
- Washington University Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Center, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Poonam Beniwal-Patel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Sowmya Palam
- Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Gaurav Syal
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Hans H Herfarth
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - George Christophi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
- Washington University Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Center, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Laura Raffals
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Edward L Barnes
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Parakkal Deepak
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
- Washington University Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Center, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Bhattacharya A, Shen B, Regueiro M. Endoscopy in Postoperative Patients with Crohn's Disease or Ulcerative Colitis. Does It Translate to Better Outcomes? Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2019; 29:487-514. [PMID: 31078249 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2019.02.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
This article discusses the use of endoscopy in patients with Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis in the postoperative setting. Endoscopy is the most sensitive and validated tool available in the diagnosis of recurrence of Crohn disease in the postoperative setting. It is also the most effective diagnostic modality available for evaluating complications of pouch anatomy in patients with ulcerative colitis. In addition to diagnosis, management postoperatively can be determined through endoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhik Bhattacharya
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, A30, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Bo Shen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, A30, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Miguel Regueiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, A30, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Nguyen N, Zhang B, Holubar SD, Pardi DS, Singh S. Treatment and prevention of pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 5:CD001176. [PMID: 31136680 PMCID: PMC6538309 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001176.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pouchitis occurs in approximately 50% of patients following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for chronic ulcerative colitis (UC). OBJECTIVES The primary objective was to determine the efficacy and safety of medical therapies for prevention or treatment of acute or chronic pouchitis. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL from inception to 25 July 2018. We also searched references, trials registers, and conference proceedings. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomized controlled trials of prevention or treatment of acute or chronic pouchitis in adults who underwent IPAA for UC were considered for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently screened studies for eligibility, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated using GRADE. The primary outcome was clinical improvement or remission in participants with acute or chronic pouchitis, or the proportion of participants with no episodes of pouchitis after IPAA. Adverse events (AEs) was a secondary outcome. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for each dichotomous outcome. MAIN RESULTS Fifteen studies (547 participants) were included. Four studies assessed treatment of acute pouchitis. Five studies assessed treatment of chronic pouchitis. Six studies assessed prevention of pouchitis. Three studies were low risk of bias. Three studies were high risk of bias and the other studies were unclear.Acute pouchitis: All ciprofloxacin participants (7/7) achieved remission at two weeks compared to 33% (3/9) of metronidazole participants (RR 2.68, 95% CI 1.13 to 6.35, very low certainty evidence). No ciprofloxacin participants (0/7) had an AE compared to 33% (3/9) of metronidazole participants (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.98; very low certainty evidence). AEs included vomiting, dysgeusia or transient peripheral neuropathy. Forty-three per cent (6/14) of metronidazole participants achieved remission at 6 weeks compared to 50% (6/12) of budesonide enema participants (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.96, very low certainty evidence). Fifty per cent (7/14) of metronidazole participants improved clinically at 6 weeks compared to 58% (7/12) of budesonide enema participants (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.74, very low certainty evidence). Fifty-seven per cent (8/14) of metronidazole participants had an AE compared to 25% (3/12) of budesonide enema participants (RR 2.29, 95% CI 0.78 to 6.73, very low certainty evidence). AEs included anorexia, nausea, headache, asthenia, metallic taste, vomiting, paraesthesia, and depression. Twenty-five per cent (2/8) of rifaximin participants achieved remission at 4 weeks compared to 0% (0/10) of placebo participants (RR 6.11, 95% CI 0.33 to 111.71, very low certainty evidence). Thirty-eight per cent (3/8) of rifaximin participants improved clinically at 4 weeks compared to 30% (3/10) of placebo participants (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.34 to 4.60, very low certainty evidence). Seventy-five per cent (6/8) of rifaximin participants had an AE compared to 50% (5/10) of placebo participants (RR 1.50, 95% CI 0.72 to 3.14, very low certainty evidence). AEs included diarrhea, flatulence, nausea, proctalgia, vomiting, thirst, candida, upper respiratory tract infection, increased hepatic enzyme, and cluster headache. Ten per cent (1/10) of Lactobacillus GG participants improved clinically at 12 weeks compared to 0% (0/10) of placebo participants (RR 3.00, 95% CI 0.14 to 65.90, very low certainty evidence).Chronic pouchitis: Eighty-five per cent (34/40) of De Simone Formulation participants maintained remission at 9 to 12 months compared to 3% (1/36) of placebo participants (RR 20.24, 95% CI 4.28 to 95.81, 2 studies; low certainty evidence). Two per cent (1/40) of De Simone Formulation participants had an AE compared to 0% (0/36) of placebo participants (RR 2.43, 95% CI 0.11 to 55.89; low certainty evidence). AEs included abdominal cramps, vomiting and diarrhea. Fifty per cent (3/6) of adalimumab patients achieved clinical improvement at 4 weeks compared to 43% (3/7) of placebo participants (RR, 1.17, 95% CI 0.36 to 3.76, low certainty evidence). Sixty per cent (6/10) of glutamine participants maintained remission at 3 weeks compared to 33% (3/9) of butyrate participants (RR 1.80, 95% CI 0.63 to 5.16, very low certainty evidence). Forty-five per cent (9/20) of patients treated with bismuth carbomer foam enema improved clinically at 3 weeks compared to 45% (9/20) of placebo participants (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.98, very low certainty evidence). Twenty-five per cent (5/20) of participants in the bismuth carbomer foam enema group had an AE compared to 35% (7/20) of placebo participants (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.88, very low certainty evidence). Adverse events included diarrhea, worsening symptoms, cramping, sinusitis, and abdominal pain. PREVENTION At 12 months, 90% (18/20) of De Simone Formulation participants had no episodes of acute pouchitis compared to 60% (12/20) of placebo participants (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.21, low certainty evidence). Another study found 100% (16/16) of De Simone Formulation participants had no episodes of acute pouchitis at 12 months compared to 92% (11/12) of the no treatment control group (RR 1.10, 95% 0.89 to 1.36, very low certainty evidence). Eighty-six per cent (6/7) of Bifidobacterium longum participants had no episodes of acute pouchitis at 6 months compared to 60% (3/5) of placebo participants (RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.66 to 3.11, very low certainty evidence). Eleven per cent (1/9) of Clostridium butyricum MIYAIRI participants had no episodes of acute pouchitis at 24 months compared to 50% (4/8) of placebo participants (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.60, very low certainty evidence). Forty-six per cent (43/94) of allopurinol participants had no episodes of pouchitis at 24 months compared to 43% (39/90) of placebo participants (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.46; low certainty evidence). Eighty-one per cent (21/26) of tinidazole participants had no episodes of pouchitis over 12 months compared to 58% (7/12) of placebo participants (RR 1.38, 95% CI 0.83 to 2.31, very low certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The effects of antibiotics, probiotics and other interventions for treating and preventing pouchitis are uncertain. Well designed, adequately powered studies are needed to determine the optimal therapy for the treatment and prevention of pouchitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nghia Nguyen
- University of California San DiegoDivision of GastroenterologyLa JollaUSA
| | - Bing Zhang
- University of California San FranciscoDivision of GastroenterologySan FranciscoUSA
| | - Stefan D Holubar
- Cleveland ClinicDepartment of Colon and Rectal SurgeryClevelandUSA
| | - Darrell S Pardi
- Mayo ClinicDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology200 First Street SWRochesterUSA55905
| | - Siddharth Singh
- University of California San DiegoDivision of GastroenterologyLa JollaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Weaver KN, Gregory M, Syal G, Hoversten P, Hicks SB, Patel D, Christophi G, Beniwal-Patel P, Isaacs KL, Raffals L, Deepak P, Herfarth HH, Barnes EL. Ustekinumab Is Effective for the Treatment of Crohn's Disease of the Pouch in a Multicenter Cohort. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2019; 25:767-774. [PMID: 30295784 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izy302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Crohn's disease (CD) of the pouch and chronic pouchitis occur in approximately 10% of patients after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) or UC-related dysplasia. The efficacy of anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents and vedolizumab have been reported for the treatment of CD of the pouch and chronic pouchitis, but little is known regarding the use of ustekinumab in these settings. Our primary aim was to evaluate the efficacy of ustekinumab for these conditions. METHODS This is a retrospective, multicenter cohort study evaluating the efficacy of ustekinumab in patients with CD of the pouch and chronic pouchitis. Clinical response or remission was judged by the treating physician's assessment at 6 months. RESULTS Fifty-six patients (47 with CD of the pouch and 9 with chronic pouchitis) were included the study. Of these, 73% had previously been treated with either anti-TNF therapy, vedolizumab, or both after IPAA. Among patients with CD of the pouch and chronic pouchitis, 83% demonstrated clinical response 6 months after induction with ustekinumab. Responders demonstrated significantly less pouch inflammation on endoscopy when compared with nonresponders (29% vs 100%; P = 0.023). Higher mean body mass index at induction (26.3 vs 23.7; P = 0.033) and male sex (83% vs 30%; P = 0.014) were significant predictors of nonresponse to ustekinumab in those with CD of the pouch. CONCLUSION In this refractory patient population, ustekinumab appears to be a safe and effective treatment for chronic pouchitis and CD of the pouch in biologic-naïve patients and those with prior anti-TNF or vedolizumab therapy failure. 10.1093/ibd/izx005_video1 izy302.video1 5844889626001.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly N Weaver
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Martin Gregory
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Gaurav Syal
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | | | | | - Devin Patel
- Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - George Christophi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.,Washington University Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Center, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Poonam Beniwal-Patel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Kim L Isaacs
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.,Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Laura Raffals
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Parakkal Deepak
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.,Washington University Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Center, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Hans H Herfarth
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.,Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Edward L Barnes
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
D'Amico F, Fiorino G, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Danese S. Vedolizumab for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases: from symptomatic control to mucosal healing. Immunotherapy 2019; 11:565-575. [PMID: 30860423 DOI: 10.2217/imt-2018-0209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Anti-TNF-α have revolutionized the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, but a significant proportion of patients do not respond or lose response over time after treatment with these drugs. Therefore, the development of drugs that act with a different mechanism of action is strongly needed. Vedolizumab is a selective blocker of intestinal integrin α4β7, which inhibits lymphocyte trafficking and blocks the inflammatory mechanism underlying the bowel damage of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Clinical trials have shown that vedolizumab is effective and safe for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease and these data have led to the approval of vedolizumab. However, it remains unclear what therapeutic algorithm to use and which drug to choose as first-line option for patients with moderate-severe disease not responsive to conventional therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ferdinando D'Amico
- Department of Gastroenterology, IBD Center, Humanitas Clinical & Research Center, 20089, Milan, Italy
| | - Gionata Fiorino
- Department of Gastroenterology, IBD Center, Humanitas Clinical & Research Center, 20089, Milan, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20089, Milan, Italy
| | - Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
- Department of Gastroenterology & NGERE Unit, Inserm U594, University Hospital of Nancy, Lorraine University, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Silvio Danese
- Department of Gastroenterology, IBD Center, Humanitas Clinical & Research Center, 20089, Milan, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20089, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Quinn KP, Lightner AL, Faubion WA, Raffals LE. A Comprehensive Approach to Pouch Disorders. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2019; 25:460-471. [PMID: 30124882 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izy267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the surgical procedure of choice for patients with medically refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) or indeterminate colitis, UC with colonic dysplasia or neoplasia, and familial adenomatous polyposis. In general, patients experience good function outcomes and quality of life with an IPAA. Although pouchitis is the most well-recognized and frequent complication after IPAA, a number of additional inflammatory, postsurgical, structural, neoplastic, and functional complications may occur, resulting in pouch dysfunction. We herein provide a comprehensive review of pouch function and an approach to diagnosis and management of pouch complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin P Quinn
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Amy L Lightner
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - William A Faubion
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Laura E Raffals
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Singh A, Khan F, Lopez R, Shen B, Philpott J. Vedolizumab for chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2019; 7:121-126. [PMID: 30976425 PMCID: PMC6454848 DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goz001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2018] [Revised: 08/22/2018] [Accepted: 09/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis (CARP) is a complication of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), which poses a therapeutic challenge. Vedolizumab, a gut-selective monoclonal antibody to the α4β7 of integrin, has been used in such patients, but data on its efficacy are limited. Our aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of vedolizumab as induction therapy in CARP patients. Methods In this single-center, historic cohort, patients with CARP who received vedolizumab between January 2015 to June 2017 were identified and analysed. Patients were included if they had active pouchitis with a total of modified pouch disease activity index (mPDAI) score ≥5 or if unavailable clinician diagnosis of active pouchitis. Pre-treatment and at 3-month post-therapy pouchoscopy and clinical visits were used to calculate mPDAI. Results A total of 19 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 26.7 ± 12.8 years, with 10 (53%) males. Nine (47%) patients had been treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents before colectomy and 10 (53%) had anti-TNFs after colectomy and IPAA. Six (32%) patients had improvement in the mPDAI symptom subscores (P = 0.031) and 14 (74%) had improvement in both endoscopic and total mPDAI scores with a median change of -2 units (both P = 0.031). Adverse events were noted only in two (11%) patients and four (21%) required surgery for CARP. Conclusions Our study suggests that vedolizumab has efficacy and can be safely used for CARP patients. Larger studies with a higher number of patients are required to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amandeep Singh
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Freeha Khan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Rocio Lopez
- Center for Populations Health Sciences & Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Bo Shen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jessica Philpott
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Ardalan ZS, Sparrow MP. A Personalized Approach to Managing Patients With an Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis. Front Med (Lausanne) 2019; 6:337. [PMID: 32064264 PMCID: PMC7000529 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) surgery is generally good. However, patients can be troubled by pouch-related symptoms and pouch disorders that can be inflammatory, mechanical/surgical, and functional. Management of patients with IPAA begins with measures to maintain a healthy pouch such as optimizing pouch function, providing tailored advice on a healthy diet and lifestyle, screening for and addressing metabolic complications of IPAA, pouch surveillance, and risk stratification for risk of pouchitis and pouch failure. Pouchitis is the most common inflammatory disorder. Primary pouchitis is a spectrum currently classified into three progressive phases-an antibiotic-responsive, an antibiotic-dependent, and an antibiotic-refractory phase. It is predominately microbially mediated in acute antibiotic-responsive pouchitis and predominately immune mediated in chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis (CARP). Secondary prophylaxis is recommended for recurrent antibiotic-responsive and for antibiotic-dependent pouchitis. Secondary causes of antibiotic-refractory pouchitis should be ruled out before a diagnosis of CARP is made. CARP is best classified as primary sclerosing cholangitis associated, immunoglobulin G4-associated, and autoimmune. Primary sclerosing cholangitis-associated CARP can be treated with budesonide or oral vancomycin. Early recognition of immunoglobulin G4-associated pouchitis minimizes ineffective antibiotic use. Autoimmune CARP can be managed in a manner similar to UC. The current place of immunosuppressives in the treatment algorithm depends on availability and early access to biological agents. Vedolizumab and ustekinumab are the preferred first- and second-line biologics for autoimmune CARP owing to their efficacy, better side effect profile, and low immunogenicity and need for concomitant immunomodulatory therapy. Antitumor necrosis factor should be reserved for autoimmune CARP failing the above and for CD of the pouch. There are no guidelines for the surveillance of pouches for dysplasia. Incidence varies based on a patient's risk. Since incidence is low, a risk-stratified approach is recommended.
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the preferred surgical treatment for patients undergoing colectomy to maintain intestinal continuity. Earlier studies have suggested that outcomes are worse in elderly patients who underwent IPAA. However, more recent reports have shown that IPAA outcomes in the elderly are comparable to younger patients. We review the recent medical literature regarding outcomes and treatments for common complications in elderly IPAA patients. RECENT FINDINGS Compared to younger patients, IPAA in the elderly is not associated with increased major surgical complications, but is associated with increased length of stay and re-admission rate for dehydration in older patients. Rates of fecal incontinence after IPAA were similar between younger and older patients. Sacral nerve stimulation has shown early promise as a possible treatment for fecal incontinence after IPAA, but more research is needed. Pouchitis is a common complication, and antibiotics remain first-line treatment options. Other treatment options include mesalamines, steroids, immunomodulators, and biologics. The efficacy of newer biologics such as vedolizumab and ustekinumab has been reported, but more data is needed. IPAA is safe in the elderly with high self-reported patient satisfaction. However, the elderly IPAA patient warrants special consideration regarding outcomes and management.
Collapse
|
50
|
Orfanoudaki E, Foteinogiannopoulou K, Koutroubakis IE. Use of vedolizumab in a patient with chronic and refractory pouchitis. Ann Gastroenterol 2018; 31:379. [PMID: 29720865 PMCID: PMC5924862 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2018.0243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2018] [Accepted: 02/07/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Eleni Orfanoudaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | | | | |
Collapse
|