1
|
Tucker EC, Angelica B, Mathias RM, Edwards L, Bryant RV, Costello SP. Outcomes of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Clostridioides difficile Infection in South Australia. Open Forum Infect Dis 2025; 12:ofaf149. [PMID: 40160347 PMCID: PMC11950531 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2025] [Indexed: 04/02/2025] Open
Abstract
Background Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) sourced from a bank of prescreened anaerobically processed frozen donor stool has been available in South Australia since 2013. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world clinical and safety outcomes of FMT for recurrent, refractory, and/or severe or fulminant Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) facilitated via this centralized facility. Methods Donor screening test data were prospectively collected on all donors who passed prescreening evaluations between April 2013 and August 2023. The South Australian FMT for CDI database prospectively recorded outcomes for consecutive patients who underwent FMT for CDI from August 2013 to May 2023 in South Australia. Results An overall 98 potential donors passed prescreening assessments and underwent laboratory screening tests: 32 (33%) had tests that failed, 5 (5%) had incomplete screening, and 61 (62%) passed. Detection of an extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing organism (9/65, 14%) was the common reason for ineligibility following completion of screening tests. In total 220 cases of CDI were recorded, and follow-up data were available in 216. Primary cure occurred in 84% of cases (182/216): 88% (132/150) for recurrent CDI, 76% (50/66) for refractory CDI, 85% (51/60) for severe disease, and 65% (17/26) for fulminant disease. Repeat FMT was delivered in 23 of 34 cases (68%), with secondary cure in 74% (17/23 cases). Serious adverse events were observed in 6 patients overall (3%). No deaths were directly attributable to FMT. Conclusions FMT was safe and efficacious for management of recurrent and refractory CDI over a 10-year period in a real-world prospective Australian cohort. Further studies to optimize the use of FMT for severe and fulminant CDI are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily C Tucker
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, Australia
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- BiomeBank, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Bianca Angelica
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Service, Department of Gastroenterology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, Australia
| | - Ryan M Mathias
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Service, Department of Gastroenterology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, Australia
| | - Louisa Edwards
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Service, Department of Gastroenterology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, Australia
| | - Robert V Bryant
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- BiomeBank, Adelaide, Australia
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Service, Department of Gastroenterology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, Australia
| | - Samuel P Costello
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- BiomeBank, Adelaide, Australia
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Service, Department of Gastroenterology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Battaglini D, Torres A. Gut microbiota and its impact on critical illness. Curr Opin Crit Care 2025; 31:189-197. [PMID: 39869364 DOI: 10.1097/mcc.0000000000001249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This narrative review discusses the mechanisms connecting gut dysbiosis to adverse clinical outcomes in critically ill patients and explores potential therapeutic strategies. RECENT FINDINGS In recent years, the study of microbiota in ICUs has gained attention because of its potential effects on patient outcomes. Critically ill patients often face severe conditions, which can compromise their immune systems and lead to opportunistic infections from bacteria typically harmless to healthy individuals. The relationship between aggressive medical treatments and microbiota composition remains unclear. Dysbiosis, characterized by reduced microbial diversity and the loss of beneficial bacteria, can lead to prolonged immunosuppression and increased pathogenic risks, contributing to infections and organ failure. Recent advancements in multiomics technologies have enhanced the understanding of host-microbe interactions and their implications in critical care. SUMMARY The microbiota plays an important role in shaping outcomes for critically ill patients. According to evidence, alterations in the gut and lung microbiota are associated with disease severity, mortality, and overall patient recovery. Evolving research opens possibilities for personalized medicine by tailoring treatments based on individual microbiota profiles, though clinical applications are still developing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise Battaglini
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genova
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Antoni Torres
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS)
- Ciber de Enfermedades Respiratorias (Ciberes), University of Barcelona (UB)
- Department of Pneumology, Institut Clinic del Tórax, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yadegar A, Bar-Yoseph H, Monaghan TM, Pakpour S, Severino A, Kuijper EJ, Smits WK, Terveer EM, Neupane S, Nabavi-Rad A, Sadeghi J, Cammarota G, Ianiro G, Nap-Hill E, Leung D, Wong K, Kao D. Fecal microbiota transplantation: current challenges and future landscapes. Clin Microbiol Rev 2024; 37:e0006022. [PMID: 38717124 PMCID: PMC11325845 DOI: 10.1128/cmr.00060-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2024] Open
Abstract
SUMMARYGiven the importance of gut microbial homeostasis in maintaining health, there has been considerable interest in developing innovative therapeutic strategies for restoring gut microbiota. One such approach, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), is the main "whole gut microbiome replacement" strategy and has been integrated into clinical practice guidelines for treating recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI). Furthermore, the potential application of FMT in other indications such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), metabolic syndrome, and solid tumor malignancies is an area of intense interest and active research. However, the complex and variable nature of FMT makes it challenging to address its precise functionality and to assess clinical efficacy and safety in different disease contexts. In this review, we outline clinical applications, efficacy, durability, and safety of FMT and provide a comprehensive assessment of its procedural and administration aspects. The clinical applications of FMT in children and cancer immunotherapy are also described. We focus on data from human studies in IBD in contrast with rCDI to delineate the putative mechanisms of this treatment in IBD as a model, including colonization resistance and functional restoration through bacterial engraftment, modulating effects of virome/phageome, gut metabolome and host interactions, and immunoregulatory actions of FMT. Furthermore, we comprehensively review omics technologies, metagenomic approaches, and bioinformatics pipelines to characterize complex microbial communities and discuss their limitations. FMT regulatory challenges, ethical considerations, and pharmacomicrobiomics are also highlighted to shed light on future development of tailored microbiome-based therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abbas Yadegar
- Foodborne and
Waterborne Diseases Research Center, Research Institute for
Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of
Medical Sciences, Tehran,
Iran
| | - Haggai Bar-Yoseph
- Department of
Gastroenterology, Rambam Health Care
Campus, Haifa,
Israel
- Rappaport Faculty of
Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of
Technology, Haifa,
Israel
| | - Tanya Marie Monaghan
- National Institute for
Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of
Nottingham, Nottingham,
United Kingdom
- Nottingham Digestive
Diseases Centre, School of Medicine, University of
Nottingham, Nottingham,
United Kingdom
| | - Sepideh Pakpour
- School of Engineering,
Faculty of Applied Sciences, UBC, Okanagan
Campus, Kelowna,
British Columbia, Canada
| | - Andrea Severino
- Department of
Translational Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del
Sacro Cuore, Rome,
Italy
- Department of Medical
and Surgical Sciences, UOC CEMAD Centro Malattie dell'Apparato
Digerente, Medicina Interna e Gastroenterologia, Fondazione Policlinico
Universitario Gemelli IRCCS,
Rome, Italy
- Department of Medical
and Surgical Sciences, UOC Gastroenterologia, Fondazione Policlinico
Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS,
Rome, Italy
| | - Ed J. Kuijper
- Center for
Microbiota Analysis and Therapeutics (CMAT), Leiden University Center
for Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical
Center, Leiden, The
Netherlands
| | - Wiep Klaas Smits
- Center for
Microbiota Analysis and Therapeutics (CMAT), Leiden University Center
for Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical
Center, Leiden, The
Netherlands
| | - Elisabeth M. Terveer
- Center for
Microbiota Analysis and Therapeutics (CMAT), Leiden University Center
for Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical
Center, Leiden, The
Netherlands
| | - Sukanya Neupane
- Division of
Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of
Alberta, Edmonton,
Alberta, Canada
| | - Ali Nabavi-Rad
- Foodborne and
Waterborne Diseases Research Center, Research Institute for
Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of
Medical Sciences, Tehran,
Iran
| | - Javad Sadeghi
- School of Engineering,
Faculty of Applied Sciences, UBC, Okanagan
Campus, Kelowna,
British Columbia, Canada
| | - Giovanni Cammarota
- Department of
Translational Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del
Sacro Cuore, Rome,
Italy
- Department of Medical
and Surgical Sciences, UOC CEMAD Centro Malattie dell'Apparato
Digerente, Medicina Interna e Gastroenterologia, Fondazione Policlinico
Universitario Gemelli IRCCS,
Rome, Italy
- Department of Medical
and Surgical Sciences, UOC Gastroenterologia, Fondazione Policlinico
Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS,
Rome, Italy
| | - Gianluca Ianiro
- Department of
Translational Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del
Sacro Cuore, Rome,
Italy
- Department of Medical
and Surgical Sciences, UOC CEMAD Centro Malattie dell'Apparato
Digerente, Medicina Interna e Gastroenterologia, Fondazione Policlinico
Universitario Gemelli IRCCS,
Rome, Italy
- Department of Medical
and Surgical Sciences, UOC Gastroenterologia, Fondazione Policlinico
Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS,
Rome, Italy
| | - Estello Nap-Hill
- Department of
Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, St Paul’s Hospital,
University of British Columbia,
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Dickson Leung
- Division of
Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of
Alberta, Edmonton,
Alberta, Canada
| | - Karen Wong
- Division of
Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of
Alberta, Edmonton,
Alberta, Canada
| | - Dina Kao
- Division of
Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of
Alberta, Edmonton,
Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mullish BH, Merrick B, Quraishi MN, Bak A, Green CA, Moore DJ, Porter RJ, Elumogo NT, Segal JP, Sharma N, Marsh B, Kontkowski G, Manzoor SE, Hart AL, Settle C, Keller JJ, Hawkey P, Iqbal TH, Goldenberg SD, Williams HRT. The use of faecal microbiota transplant as treatment for recurrent or refractory Clostridioides difficile infection and other potential indications: second edition of joint British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Healthcare Infection Society (HIS) guidelines. Gut 2024; 73:1052-1075. [PMID: 38609165 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-331550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024]
Abstract
The first British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Healthcare Infection Society (HIS)-endorsed faecal microbiota transplant (FMT) guidelines were published in 2018. Over the past 5 years, there has been considerable growth in the evidence base (including publication of outcomes from large national FMT registries), necessitating an updated critical review of the literature and a second edition of the BSG/HIS FMT guidelines. These have been produced in accordance with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence-accredited methodology, thus have particular relevance for UK-based clinicians, but are intended to be of pertinence internationally. This second edition of the guidelines have been divided into recommendations, good practice points and recommendations against certain practices. With respect to FMT for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), key focus areas centred around timing of administration, increasing clinical experience of encapsulated FMT preparations and optimising donor screening. The latter topic is of particular relevance given the COVID-19 pandemic, and cases of patient morbidity and mortality resulting from FMT-related pathogen transmission. The guidelines also considered emergent literature on the use of FMT in non-CDI settings (including both gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal indications), reviewing relevant randomised controlled trials. Recommendations are provided regarding special areas (including compassionate FMT use), and considerations regarding the evolving landscape of FMT and microbiome therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin H Mullish
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Departments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Blair Merrick
- Centre for Clinical Infection and Diagnostics Research, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Mohammed Nabil Quraishi
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Microbiome Treatment Centre, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, London, UK
| | - Aggie Bak
- Healthcare Infection Society, London, UK
| | - Christopher A Green
- Department of Infectious Diseases & Tropical Medicine, University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, UK
- School of Chemical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - David J Moore
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Robert J Porter
- Department of Microbiology, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospitals, Barrack Road, UK
| | - Ngozi T Elumogo
- Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK
| | - Jonathan P Segal
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Naveen Sharma
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Microbiome Treatment Centre, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, London, UK
| | - Belinda Marsh
- Lay representative for FMT Working Party, Healthcare Infection Society, London, UK
| | - Graziella Kontkowski
- Lay representative for FMT Working Party, Healthcare Infection Society, London, UK
- C.diff support, London, UK
| | - Susan E Manzoor
- Microbiome Treatment Centre, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK
| | - Ailsa L Hart
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Middlesex, UK
| | | | - Josbert J Keller
- Department of Gastroenterology, Haaglanden Medisch Centrum, The Hague, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Hawkey
- Microbiome Treatment Centre, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK
- Public Health Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Tariq H Iqbal
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Microbiome Treatment Centre, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, London, UK
| | - Simon D Goldenberg
- Centre for Clinical Infection and Diagnostics Research, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Horace R T Williams
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Departments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mullish BH, Merrick B, Quraishi MN, Bak A, Green CA, Moore DJ, Porter RJ, Elumogo NT, Segal JP, Sharma N, Marsh B, Kontkowski G, Manzoor SE, Hart AL, Settle C, Keller JJ, Hawkey P, Iqbal TH, Goldenberg SD, Williams HRT. The use of faecal microbiota transplant as treatment for recurrent or refractory Clostridioides difficile infection and other potential indications: second edition of joint British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Healthcare Infection Society (HIS) guidelines. J Hosp Infect 2024; 148:189-219. [PMID: 38609760 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/14/2024]
Abstract
The first British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Healthcare Infection Society (HIS)-endorsed faecal microbiota transplant (FMT) guidelines were published in 2018. Over the past 5 years, there has been considerable growth in the evidence base (including publication of outcomes from large national FMT registries), necessitating an updated critical review of the literature and a second edition of the BSG/HIS FMT guidelines. These have been produced in accordance with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence-accredited methodology, thus have particular relevance for UK-based clinicians, but are intended to be of pertinence internationally. This second edition of the guidelines have been divided into recommendations, good practice points and recommendations against certain practices. With respect to FMT for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), key focus areas centred around timing of administration, increasing clinical experience of encapsulated FMT preparations and optimising donor screening. The latter topic is of particular relevance given the COVID-19 pandemic, and cases of patient morbidity and mortality resulting from FMT-related pathogen transmission. The guidelines also considered emergent literature on the use of FMT in non-CDI settings (including both gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal indications), reviewing relevant randomised controlled trials. Recommendations are provided regarding special areas (including compassionate FMT use), and considerations regarding the evolving landscape of FMT and microbiome therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B H Mullish
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK; Departments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - B Merrick
- Centre for Clinical Infection and Diagnostics Research, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, King's College London, London, UK
| | - M N Quraishi
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; Microbiome Treatment Centre, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, London, UK
| | - A Bak
- Healthcare Infection Society, London, UK
| | - C A Green
- Department of Infectious Diseases & Tropical Medicine, University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, UK; School of Chemical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - D J Moore
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - R J Porter
- Department of Microbiology, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospitals, Barrack Road, UK
| | - N T Elumogo
- Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK; Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK
| | - J P Segal
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - N Sharma
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; Microbiome Treatment Centre, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, London, UK
| | - B Marsh
- Lay Representative for FMT Working Party, Healthcare Infection Society, London, UK
| | - G Kontkowski
- Lay Representative for FMT Working Party, Healthcare Infection Society, London, UK; C.diff support, London, UK
| | - S E Manzoor
- Microbiome Treatment Centre, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK
| | - A L Hart
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Middlesex, UK
| | - C Settle
- South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, South Shields, UK
| | - J J Keller
- Department of Gastroenterology, Haaglanden Medisch Centrum, The Hague, The Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - P Hawkey
- Microbiome Treatment Centre, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK; Public Health Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - T H Iqbal
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; Microbiome Treatment Centre, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, London, UK
| | - S D Goldenberg
- Centre for Clinical Infection and Diagnostics Research, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, King's College London, London, UK.
| | - H R T Williams
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK; Departments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Peery AF, Kelly CR, Kao D, Vaughn BP, Lebwohl B, Singh S, Imdad A, Altayar O. AGA Clinical Practice Guideline on Fecal Microbiota-Based Therapies for Select Gastrointestinal Diseases. Gastroenterology 2024; 166:409-434. [PMID: 38395525 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Fecal microbiota-based therapies include conventional fecal microbiota transplant and US Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies, fecal microbiota live-jslm and fecal microbiota spores live-brpk. The American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) developed this guideline to provide recommendations on the use of fecal microbiota-based therapies in adults with recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection; severe to fulminant C difficile infection; inflammatory bowel diseases, including pouchitis; and irritable bowel syndrome. METHODS The guideline was developed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) framework to prioritize clinical questions, identify patient-centered outcomes, and conduct an evidence synthesis. The guideline panel used the Evidence-to-Decision framework to develop recommendations for the use of fecal microbiota-based therapies in the specified gastrointestinal conditions and provided implementation considerations for clinical practice. RESULTS The guideline panel made 7 recommendations. In immunocompetent adults with recurrent C difficile infection, the AGA suggests select use of fecal microbiota-based therapies on completion of standard of care antibiotics to prevent recurrence. In mildly or moderately immunocompromised adults with recurrent C difficile infection, the AGA suggests select use of conventional fecal microbiota transplant. In severely immunocompromised adults, the AGA suggests against the use of any fecal microbiota-based therapies to prevent recurrent C difficile. In adults hospitalized with severe or fulminant C difficile not responding to standard of care antibiotics, the AGA suggests select use of conventional fecal microbiota transplant. The AGA suggests against the use of conventional fecal microbiota transplant as treatment for inflammatory bowel diseases or irritable bowel syndrome, except in the context of clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS Fecal microbiota-based therapies are effective therapy to prevent recurrent C difficile in select patients. Conventional fecal microbiota transplant is an adjuvant treatment for select adults hospitalized with severe or fulminant C difficile infection not responding to standard of care antibiotics. Fecal microbiota transplant cannot yet be recommended in other gastrointestinal conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne F Peery
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Colleen R Kelly
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Dina Kao
- University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Osama Altayar
- Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is the process of transplanting stool from a healthy donor into the gut of a patient for therapeutic purposes. Current guidelines recommend FMT for the prevention of multiply recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) after two recurrences, with cure rates approaching 90%. Emerging evidence also supports the use of FMT in the management of severe and fulminant CDI, resulting in decreased mortality and colectomy rates compared with standard of care approach. FMT shows promise as salvage therapy for critically-ill, refractory CDI patients who are poor surgical candidates. FMT should be considered early in the clinical course of severe CDI, preferably within 48 hours of failing to respond to antibiotic therapy and volume resuscitation. Besides CDI, ulcerative colitis was more recently identified as a potential treatment target for FMT. Several live biotherapeutics for microbiome restoration are on the horizon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yao-Wen Cheng
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Santa Clara Medical Center, Santa Clara, California
| | - Monika Fischer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Spartz EJ, Estafanos M, Mallick R, Gaertner W, Vakayil V, Jahansouz C, Aggarwal R, Ikramuddin S, Khoruts A, Harmon JV. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Fulminant Clostridioides Difficile Infection: A Combined Medical and Surgical Case Series. Cureus 2023; 15:e34998. [PMID: 36938160 PMCID: PMC10020130 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.34998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Urgent abdominal colectomy is indicated for patients with fulminant Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) when other medical therapies fail, yet mortality remains high. Fecal microbiota transplant is a less invasive alternative approach for patients with fulminant CDI. We report the 30-day complications of patients with fulminant CDI who underwent either abdominal colectomy, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), or FMT followed by abdominal colectomy (FMT-CO). Methods: We performed a single-center, retrospective case review of combined medical and surgical patients with CDI at a large academic medical center between 2008 and 2016. Cohorts were identified as patients with fulminant CDI who underwent total abdominal colectomy alone (CO), FMT alone (FMT), or FMT-CO. We analyzed patient demographics, history, comorbidities, clinical and laboratory variables, CDI severity scores, and mortality outcomes at 30 days. Results: We identified 5,150 patients with CDI at our center during the review period; 16 patients met the criteria for fulminant CDI and were included in this study, with four patients in the CO cohort, eight patients in the FMT cohort, and four patients in the FMT-CO cohort. Demographics and CDI severity scores were similar for all three groups, although the selected comorbidity profiles differed significantly among the three cohorts. The 30-day mortality rates for patients in the CO, FMT, and FMT-CO groups were 25%, 12.5%, and 25%, respectively. Conclusions: FMT is an alternative or adjunctive therapy to colectomy for patients with fulminant CDI that is not associated with increased mortality. Implementation of FMT protocols in clinical practice would be dependent on the availability of qualified transplant material and successful early identification of patients likely to benefit from FMT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen J Spartz
- Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Mina Estafanos
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA
| | - Reema Mallick
- Department of Surgery, Surgery South, Stockbridge, USA
| | | | - Victor Vakayil
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA
| | - Cyrus Jahansouz
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA
| | - Rishav Aggarwal
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA
| | | | | | - James V Harmon
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Suchman K, Luo Y, Grinspan A. Fecal Microbiota Transplant for Clostridioides Difficile Infection Is Safe and Efficacious in an Immunocompromised Cohort. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 67:4866-4873. [PMID: 35000023 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-021-07347-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunocompromised patients are particularly vulnerable to Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), hospitalizations and recurrences. Studies have shown that fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) is safe and effective in immunocompromised patients. AIMS To examine the outcomes of FMT for CDI in a diverse cohort of immunocompromised patients stratified by medication class. METHODS We performed a retrospective, long-term follow-up study of FMT in immunocompromised patients, including those undergoing chemotherapy, with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on immunomodulators, prior solid organ transplant on immunosuppressants, on chronic steroids 20 mg/day or higher for a minimum of three months, or HIV positive. Primary outcomes included adjusted primary cure rate within 8 weeks, as well as rates of non-response, recurrences, relapses and adverse events. Secondary outcomes included adjusted overall cure rate. Primary cure rate was defined as patients not requiring repeat CDI treatment within 8 weeks after index FMT, and overall cure rate was defined as resolution of CDI symptoms after index FMT or second FMT. RESULTS Our cohort included 77 immunosuppressed patients (53.2% female, median age 39.1 years, range 7-95 years). The majority of our cohort were IBD patients on biologics (62.3%). Adjusting for colectomies and deaths, our primary and overall cure rates were 85.1% and 86.5%, respectively. Twelve patients received FMT for severe or fulminant CDI with a 3-month survival rate of 91.7%. 11.7% of patients experienced serious adverse events following FMT. CONCLUSIONS Our study supports the efficacy and safety of FMT in immunocompromised patients, though future research is needed to further ascertain the potential effects of immunosuppression on FMT outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Suchman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Northshore Hospital, Barbara and Zucker School of Medicine for Hofstra/Northwell Health, 300 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY, 11030, USA.
| | - Yuying Luo
- The Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 11029, USA
| | - Ari Grinspan
- The Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 11029, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ramesh AS, Munoz Tello C, Jamil D, Tran HHV, Mansoor M, Butt SR, Satnarine T, Ratna P, Sarker A, Khan S. Role of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Reducing Clostridioides difficile Infection-Associated Morbidity and Mortality: A Systematic Review. Cureus 2022; 14:e28402. [PMID: 36168377 PMCID: PMC9506672 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.28402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) is a gram-positive, anaerobic, spore-forming bacterium that produces toxins A and B, disrupting the intestinal brush border and resulting in severe diarrhea. The most common causes of infection include prolonged antibiotic use, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), and long-term hospitalization resulting in complications such as pseudomembranous colitis and toxic megacolon. This systematic review aims to consider fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) as an early treatment modality in C. difficile infection to prevent complications and reduce related morbidity and mortality. We systematically screened three databases using regular keywords such as "fecal microbiota transplantation," "C. difficile," "pseudomembranous colitis," and "toxic megacolon" and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms. We applied the inclusion and exclusion criteria and performed a thorough quality appraisal using standardized checklists. We were finally left with 10 articles, including seven case reports, one case series, and two observational studies. Questions remain as to the route of administration of FMT, timing, safety, availability, and the number of sittings required. More randomized controlled trials are needed to address all these questions and to assess the safety of FMT. We believe the role of FMT is very important as it can prevent C. difficile related complications and would be an ideal treatment option in a population group that is often unfit for surgical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adarsh Srinivas Ramesh
- Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Carlos Munoz Tello
- Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Dawood Jamil
- Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Hadrian Hoang-Vu Tran
- Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Mafaz Mansoor
- Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Samia Rauf Butt
- Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Travis Satnarine
- Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Pranuthi Ratna
- Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Aditi Sarker
- Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Safeera Khan
- Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mironova M, Ehrlich AC, Grinspan A, Protano MA. Fecal microbiota transplantation may reduce the mortality of patients with severe and fulminant Clostridioides difficile infection compared to standard-of-care antibiotics in a community hospital. J Dig Dis 2022; 23:500-505. [PMID: 36183340 DOI: 10.1111/1751-2980.13134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is known for significant morbidity and mortality. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective therapy for recurrent and resistant CDI. However, its impact on the mortality rate of patients with severe and fulminant CDI has not been rigorously studied yet. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of FMT on the mortality rate of patients with severe or fulminant CDI in a community hospital system. METHODS Our study included 106 inpatients with severe or fulminant CDI. Both standard-of-care (SOC) and FMT were provided to 14 (13.2%) patients (the FMT group). SOC antibiotics alone were provided to 92 (86.8%) patients, out of whom 28 patients were included via propensity score matching in a 2:1 ratio (the SOC group). The primary outcome was defined as the composite end-point of mortality during admission, within 30 and 90 days after discharge, and discharge with comfort measures only. Each component was a secondary end-point. RESULTS The primary outcome rate in the FMT group was 7.1% (1/14) compared to 25.0% (7/28) in the SOC group. Univariate analysis demonstrated that FMT decreases mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01-0.58, P = 0.01). However, multivariate regression did not show statistical significance (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.01-2.53, P = 0.19), possibly due to the small sample size. CONCLUSIONS FMT may decrease the mortality of patients with severe and fulminant CDI. Large studies are needed to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Mironova
- Division of Internal Medicine, Capital Health, Trenton, New Jersey, USA
| | - Adam C Ehrlich
- Section of Gastroenterology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ari Grinspan
- The Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tixier EN, Verheyen E, Luo Y, Grinspan LT, Du CH, Ungaro RC, Walsh S, Grinspan AM. Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis: Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Severe or Fulminant Clostridioides difficile. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 67:978-988. [PMID: 33748913 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-021-06908-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Severe and fulminant Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. While fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has proved to be a highly effective treatment for recurrent CDI, its efficacy in severe or fulminant CDI remains uncertain. AIMS To perform a systematic review with meta-analysis evaluating clinical outcomes and safety of FMT in severe and fulminant CDI. METHODS A systemic review with meta-analysis was performed through comprehensive search of Embase, Medline (Ovid), trial registers, and conference abstracts through January 2020. Studies on FMT in severe and fulminant CDI were included. Meta-analysis was done with random effects models given heterogeneity to estimate rates of cure, mortality, and colectomy. Publication bias was assessed using Egger's test. RESULTS Sixteen studies comprised of one randomized controlled trial, four cohort studies, and eleven case series were analyzed. In total, 676 patients underwent FMT for severe or fulminant CDI. The overall rate of clinical cure after single FMT was 61.3% (95% CI 43.2-78.0%) with 10.9% (95% CI 0.2-30.2%) of patients experiencing major adverse events. The overall pooled colectomy rate after FMT was 8.2% (95% CI 0.1-23.7%) with a pooled all-cause mortality rate after FMT of 15.6% (95% CI 7.8-25.0%). CONCLUSION Low-quality data support the use of fecal microbiota transplantation in patients with severe and fulminant Clostridioides difficile infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily N Tixier
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Yuying Luo
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Charles H Du
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ryan C Ungaro
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Samantha Walsh
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ari M Grinspan
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Carlson TJ, Gonzales-Luna AJ, Garey KW. Fulminant Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Review of Treatment Options for a Life-Threatening Infection. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2022; 43:28-38. [PMID: 35172356 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Fulminant Clostridioides difficile infection (FCDI) encompasses 3 to 5% of all CDI cases with associated mortality rates between 30 and 40%. Major treatment modalities include surgery and medical management with antibiotic and nonantibiotic therapies. However, identification of patients with CDI that will progress to FCDI is difficult and makes it challenging to direct medical management and identify those who may benefit from surgery. Furthermore, since it is difficult to study such a critically ill population, data investigating treatment options are limited. Surgical management with diverting loop ileostomy (LI) instead of a total abdominal colectomy (TAC) with end ileostomy has several appealing advantages, and studies have not consistently demonstrated a clinical benefit with this less-invasive strategy, so both LI and TAC remain acceptable surgical options. Successful medical management of FCDI is complicated by pharmacokinetic changes that occur in critically ill patients, and there is an absence of high-quality studies that included patients with FCDI. Recommendations accordingly include a combination of antibiotics administered via multiple routes to ensure adequate drug concentrations in the colon: intravenous metronidazole, high-dose oral vancomycin, and rectal vancomycin. Although fidaxomicin is now recommended as first-line therapy for non-FCDI, there are limited clinical data to support its use in FCDI. Several nonantibiotic therapies, including fecal microbiota transplantation and intravenous immunoglobulin, have shown success as adjunctive therapies, but they are unlikely to be effective alone. In this review, we aim to summarize diagnosis and treatment options for FCDI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Travis J Carlson
- Department of Clinical Sciences, High Point University Fred Wilson School of Pharmacy, High Point, North Carolina
| | - Anne J Gonzales-Luna
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Translational Research, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, Texas
| | - Kevin W Garey
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Translational Research, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Nzabarushimana E, Tang H. Functional profile of host microbiome indicates Clostridioides difficile infection. Gut Microbes 2022; 14:2135963. [PMID: 36289064 PMCID: PMC9621045 DOI: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2135963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a gastro-intestinal (GI) infection that illustrates how perturbations in symbiotic host-microbiome interactions render the GI tract vulnerable to the opportunistic pathogens. CDI also serves as an example of how such perturbations could be reversed via gut microbiota modulation mechanisms, especially fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). However, microbiome-mediated diagnosis of CDI remains understudied. Here, we evaluated the diagnostic capabilities of the fecal microbiome on the prediction of CDI. We used the metagenomic sequencing data from ten previous studies, encompassing those acquired from CDI patients treated by FMT, CDI-negative patients presenting other intestinal health conditions, and healthy volunteers taking antibiotics. We designed a hybrid species/function profiling approach that determines the abundances of microbial species in the community contributing to its functional profile. These functionally informed taxonomic profiles were then used for classification of the microbial samples. We used logistic regression (LR) models using these features, which showed high prediction accuracy (with an average A U C ≥ 0.91 ), substantiating that the species/function composition of the gut microbiome has a robust diagnostic prediction of CDI. We further assessed the confounding impact of antibiotic therapy on CDI prediction and found that it is distinguishable from the CDI impact. Finally, we devised a log-odds score computed from the output of the LR models to quantify the likelihood of CDI in a gut microbiome sample and applied it to evaluating the effectiveness of FMT based on post-FMT microbiome samples. The results showed that the gut microbiome of patients exhibited a gradual but steady improvement after receiving successful FMT, indicating the restoration of the normal microbiome functions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Etienne Nzabarushimana
- Luddy School of Informatics, Computing and Engineering, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Haixu Tang
- Luddy School of Informatics, Computing and Engineering, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Baunwall SMD, Dahlerup JF, Engberg JH, Erikstrup C, Helms M, Juel MA, Kjeldsen J, Nielsen HL, Nilsson AC, Rode AA, Vinter-Jensen L, Hvas CL. Danish national guideline for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection and use of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). Scand J Gastroenterol 2021; 56:1056-1077. [PMID: 34261379 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1922749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Aim: This Danish national guideline describes the treatment of adult patients with Clostridioides (formerly Clostridium) difficile (CD) infection and the use of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). It suggests minimum standard for implementing an FMT service.Method: Four scientific societies appointed members for a working group which conducted a systematic literature review and agreed on the text and recommendations. All clinical recommendations were evalluated for evidence level and grade of recommendation.Results: In CD infection, the use of marketed and experimental antibiotics as well as microbiota-based therapies including FMT are described. An algorithm for evaluating treatment effect is suggested. The organisation of FMT, donor recruitment and screening, laboratory preparation, clinical application and follow-up are described.Conclusion: Updated evidence for the treatment of CD infection and the use of FMT is provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jens Frederik Dahlerup
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Christian Erikstrup
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Morten Helms
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | | | - Jens Kjeldsen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Hans Linde Nielsen
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | | - Anne Abildtrup Rode
- Department of Internal Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Lars Vinter-Jensen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Christian Lodberg Hvas
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gupta S, Zhu J, McCarty TR, Pruce J, Kassam Z, Kelly C, Fischer M, Allegretti JR. Cost-effectiveness analysis of sequential fecal microbiota transplantation for fulminant Clostridioides difficile infection. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 36:2432-2440. [PMID: 33682170 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2020] [Revised: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Fulminant Clostridioides difficile infections (FCDI) account for 8% of cases and substantial healthcare burden. Fecal microbiota transplantation is recommended for recurrent CDI, but emerging data support use for FCDI. We aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of a sequential fecal microbiota transplantation (sFMT) protocol for FCDI compared with current standard therapy. METHODS A Markov model simulated patients with FCDI in a 1-year time horizon. The treatment algorithm for up to three sFMTs, clinical probabilities, and direct costs were used from published sources. Outcomes were quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs. The healthcare sector perspective was used with a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per QALY. RESULTS Sequential fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for FCDI was associated with lower overall cost ($28 309 vs $33 980) and higher QALY (0.765 vs 0.686) compared with standard therapy. sFMT is cost-effective in 100% of iterations. sFMT remained cost-effective at cure rates > 44.8% for the first FMT and at stool preparation cost < $6944 per instillation. We find a wide range of efficacies for the first versus second FMT at which sFMT is still preferred. Value of information analysis estimates the expected value of perfect information to be low at $1.89 per person, quantified with net monetary benefit. CONCLUSIONS An sFMT strategy strongly dominates standard therapy, with lower cost and higher QALY. Sensitivity analysis demonstrates benefit even if FMT cure rates are lower than expected and when multiple FMTs are required. FMT material in 2020 was priced at $1695 per treatment but remains cost-effective at a much higher cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanchit Gupta
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jinyi Zhu
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Thomas R McCarty
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jordan Pruce
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Zain Kassam
- Finch Therapeutics, Somerville, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Colleen Kelly
- Women's Medicine Collaborative, Lifespan, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.,Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Monika Fischer
- Division of Gastroenterology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Jessica R Allegretti
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Song YN, Yang DY, Veldhuyzen van Zanten S, Wong K, McArthur E, Song CZ, Ianiro G, Cammarota G, Kelly C, Fischer M, Russell L, Kao D. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Severe or Fulminant Clostridioides difficile Infection: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol 2021; 5:e1-e11. [PMID: 35118227 PMCID: PMC8806043 DOI: 10.1093/jcag/gwab023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Severe or fulminant Clostridioides difficile infection (SFCDI) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Emerging evidence suggests fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) may be a promising therapy for SFCDI. Aim This systematic review determines the safety and efficacy of FMT in medically refractory SFCDI. Methods A systematic search of the literature was conducted using PubMed (1965 to 2020), Web of Science (1900 to 20), EMBASE (1974 to 2020), and Cochrane Review (1945 to 2020). Quality appraisal by NIH Study Quality Assessment tools, and data extraction were performed by two teams of independent researchers. The primary outcome was resolution of SFCDI 4 weeks after the final FMT. Pooled resolution rates were calculated using generalized linear mixed models estimates. Results Two hundred and forty patients from 10 studies (8 case series, 1 case–control and 1 randomized study) were included with 209 individual patient-level data. FMT resulted in resolution of SFCDI within 4 weeks in 211/240 individuals for a pooled estimate of 88% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83 to 0.91). The mean number of FMT required was 1.6 for severe and 2.0 for fulminant CDI resolution. The pooled proportional estimates for patients requiring CDI-directed antimicrobials after FMT was 50% (95% CI: 0.06 to 0.94) for severe CDI and 67.0% (95% CI: 0.30 to 0.91) for fulminant CDI. Serious adverse event rates were low. Conclusion FMT appears effective in treating SFCDI patients with low adverse events, but requires multiple treatments with a significant proportion of patients requiring additional anti-CDI antibiotics to achieve resolution. The optimal route of FMT delivery remains unknown. The presence of pseudomembranous colitis may guide additional FMT or anti-CDI antibiotic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Nong Song
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta,Canada
| | - David Yi Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta,Canada
| | | | - Karen Wong
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta,Canada
| | | | - Claire Zhao Song
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta,Canada
| | - Gianluca Ianiro
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS Universita` Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome,Italy
| | - Giovanni Cammarota
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS Universita` Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome,Italy
| | - Colleen Kelly
- Division of Gastroenterology, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island,USA
| | - Monika Fischer
- Division of Gastroenterology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Lindsey Russell
- Division of Gastroenterology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dina Kao
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta,Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Dalal RS, Allegretti JR. Diagnosis and management of Clostridioides difficile infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2021; 37:336-343. [PMID: 33654015 PMCID: PMC8169557 DOI: 10.1097/mog.0000000000000739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) may complicate the course of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. The clinical presentation of CDI in this population is often atypical, and patients may experience exacerbations of their underlying inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) secondary to C. difficile. In this review, we aim to review the risk factors, diagnosis, and management of CDI in the context of IBD. RECENT FINDINGS Patients with colonic involvement of their IBD are at higher risk for CDI and colonization may be more common than in the general population. Therefore, CDI is confirmed using a two-step approach to stool testing. Oral vancomycin or fidaxomicin are the preferred agents for nonfulminant disease, and oral metronidazole is no longer recommended as first-line therapy. For all patients with CDI recurrence, fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) should be considered, as this has been shown to be safe and effective. Among those who have worsening of their underlying IBD, retrospective research suggest that outcomes are improved for those who undergo escalation of immunosuppression with appropriate antimicrobial treatment of C. difficile, however prospective data are needed. SUMMARY CDI may complicate the course of IBD, however the presentation may not be typical. Therefore, all patients with worsening gastrointestinal symptoms should be evaluated for both CDI and IBD exacerbation. Providers should consider FMT for all patients with recurrent CDI as well as escalation of immunosuppression for patients who fail to improve with appropriate antimicrobial therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahul S. Dalal
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jessica R. Allegretti
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hospitalized Older Patients with Clostridioides difficile Infection Refractory to Conventional Antibiotic Therapy Benefit from Fecal Microbiota Transplant. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 3. [PMID: 34263258 PMCID: PMC8277114 DOI: 10.20900/agmr20210012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Background: Options for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) refractory to conventional therapy are limited. Fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) is considered safe and effective treatment for recurrent CDI and could be a treatment option for refractory CDI. We investigated the efficacy and safety of FMT in hospitalized patients who were not responding to standard treatments for CDI. Methods: Electronic medical records of patients who received FMT inpatient for refractory CDI were reviewed as part of quality improvement efforts to evaluate safety and efficacy of FMT in inpatient setting. Results: Between July 2014 and December 2019, 9 patients (age 60–96) received FMT for CDI as inpatient for refractory or fulminant CDI. Most (7 of 9) of these patients had pseudomembranous colitis and underwent multiple FMTs (mean 2.15, range 1 to 3). Five patients had complete resolution and one patient had diarrhea that was C. difficile-negative. There was one recurrent CDI and two deaths, one of which may have been related to FMT or CDI. Compared to recurrent CDI at diagnosis, patients with refractory CDI had higher WBC and neutrophil counts, which decreased after FMT. The overall cure rate of FMT in refractory cases was 66.7%. Conclusions: This study shows moderate efficacy of FMT for treatment of refractory CDI although multiple FMT treatment may need to be administered in the presence of pseudomembranous colitis. Inpatient FMT may be an alternative strategy for managing refractory CDI in this population of patients who may not have any effective medical treatment available.
Collapse
|
20
|
Cappetto CM. Successful use of early, repeat fecal microbiota transplantation for initial treatment of severe, refractory Clostridioides difficile colitis. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2021; 78:1374-1381. [PMID: 33851215 PMCID: PMC8083311 DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/zxab161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose There is a paucity of literature surrounding the use of early fecal
microbiota transplantation (FMT) for patients presenting with an initial
episode of severe, refractory Clostridioides difficile
infection (CDI). Information on optimal antibiotic dosing and therapy
duration surrounding FMT during an acute, initial episode of CDI is also
limited. Described here is a case of successful treatment of CDI after 4
FMTs during an acute, initial episode of severe, refractory
Clostridioides difficile colitis. Summary A 69-year-old community-dwelling, Caucasian male presented after 48 hours of
vomiting and diarrhea. A stool sample was collected and resulted positive
for Clostridioides difficile by both polymerase chain
reaction (PCR) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The patient
was treated with several days of oral and rectal vancomycin therapy in
addition to intravenous metronidazole, but those treatments failed. His
clinical and nutrition status deteriorated over the course of several days
until salvage therapy was ordered, with administration of 1 inpatient
nasogastric FMT and 1 inpatient colonoscopic FMT followed by outpatient
colonoscopic FMTs on 2 consecutive days within 2 weeks of hospital
discharge. Conclusion This case suggests a role for early, repeat FMT during an initial
presentation of a severe Clostridioides difficile colitis
episode refractory to pharmacologic antimicrobial therapy. It also adds to
emerging literature regarding the timing of antibiotic cessation surrounding
FMT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine M Cappetto
- Department of Pharmacy, Cleveland Clinic Fairview Hospital, Cleveland, OH.,Northeast Ohio Medical University College of Pharmacy, Rootstown, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been recommended in clinical guidelines for the treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). However, it is considered investigational by most regulatory agencies. As the adoption of FMT has increased from a small group of CDI experts alone to more widespread use, there has been a corresponding increase in concern regarding potential risk. FMT is largely considered a safe procedure although risks described range from mild gastrointestinal symptoms to serious infection. Currently, there is variability in how "FMT" is characterized specifically regarding testing approach, which, in turn, impacts the risk profile. This has been highlighted by the rare cases of multidrug-resistant organisms, Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia and enteropathogenic E. coli, recently reported, where these organisms were not screened. These cases have prompted additional screening mandates from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which has maintained its policy of enforcement discretion for the use of FMT for CDI not responding to standard therapy. Here, we examine the evolving risk landscape of FMT.
Collapse
|
22
|
Marcella C, Cui B, Kelly CR, Ianiro G, Cammarota G, Zhang F. Systematic review: the global incidence of faecal microbiota transplantation-related adverse events from 2000 to 2020. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2021; 53:33-42. [PMID: 33159374 DOI: 10.1111/apt.16148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 123] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Revised: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective treatment in C. difficile infection (CDI) and is currently being investigated in other diseases. There is concern around the safety of FMT and that side effects or complications may be under-reported in the medical literature. AIM To evaluate the safety of FMT by summarising the overall reported Adverse Events (AEs) over a 20-year period METHODS: We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases, and CNKI and Wanfang Data from January 2000 to April 2020. All original studies reporting FMT-related AEs were considered for inclusion. FMT-related AEs were further classified as delivery-related or microbiota-related. RESULTS Based on the inclusion criteria, 129 studies, which included 4241 patients (5688 FMT courses), were finally eligible. The most common indication for FMT was CDI. Overall, FMT-related AEs were observed in 19% of FMT procedures. The most frequently reported FMT-related AEs were diarrhoea (10%) and abdominal discomfort/pain/cramping (7%). FMT-related serious adverse events (SAEs), including infections and deaths, have been reported in 1.4% of patients who underwent FMT (0.99% microbiota-related SAEs). Four of five FMT-related deaths were reported in patients receiving FMT via the upper gastrointestinal route. Importantly, all reported FMT-related SAEs were in patients with mucosal barrier injury. CONCLUSION Most FMT-related AEs were mild or moderate and self-limiting. Although FMT appears to be highly safe, its methodology should be improved to reduce both delivery-related AEs and, microbiota-related AEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cicilia Marcella
- Medical Center of Digestive Disease, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- Key Lab of Holistic Integrative Enterology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Bota Cui
- Medical Center of Digestive Disease, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- Key Lab of Holistic Integrative Enterology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Colleen R Kelly
- Division of Gastroenterology, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Gianluca Ianiro
- Digestive Diseases Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Cammarota
- Digestive Diseases Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Faming Zhang
- Medical Center of Digestive Disease, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- Key Lab of Holistic Integrative Enterology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Adelman MW, Woodworth MH, Shaffer VO, Martin GS, Kraft CS. Critical Care Management of the Patient with Clostridioides difficile. Crit Care Med 2021; 49:127-139. [PMID: 33156122 PMCID: PMC7967892 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000004739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To review published clinical evidence on management of Clostridioides difficile infection in critically ill patients. DATA SOURCES We obtained relevant studies from a PubMed literature review and bibliographies of reviewed articles. STUDY SELECTION We selected English-language studies addressing aspects of C. difficile infection relevant to critical care clinicians including epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention, with a focus on high-quality clinical evidence. DATA EXTRACTION We reviewed potentially relevant studies and abstracted information on study design, methods, patient selection, and results of relevant studies. This is a synthetic (i.e., not systematic) review. DATA SYNTHESIS C. difficile infection is the most common healthcare-associated infection in the United States. Antibiotics are the most significant C. difficile infection risk factor, and among antibiotics, cephalosporins, clindamycin, carbapenems, fluoroquinolones, and piperacillin-tazobactam confer the highest risk. Age, diabetes mellitus, inflammatory bowel disease, and end-stage renal disease are risk factors for C. difficile infection development and mortality. C. difficile infection diagnosis is based on testing appropriately selected patients with diarrhea or on clinical suspicion for patients with ileus. Patients with fulminant disease (C. difficile infection with hypotension, shock, ileus, or megacolon) should be treated with oral vancomycin and IV metronidazole, as well as rectal vancomycin in case of ileus. Patients who do not respond to initial therapy should be considered for fecal microbiota transplant or surgery. Proper infection prevention practices decrease C. difficile infection risk. CONCLUSIONS Strong clinical evidence supports limiting antibiotics when possible to decrease C. difficile infection risk. For patients with fulminant C. difficile infection, oral vancomycin reduces mortality, and adjunctive therapies (including IV metronidazole) and interventions (including fecal microbiota transplant) may benefit select patients. Several important questions remain regarding fulminant C. difficile infection management, including which patients benefit from fecal microbiota transplant or surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max W. Adelman
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Michael H. Woodworth
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Virginia O. Shaffer
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Greg S. Martin
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Emory Critical Care Center, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Colleen S. Kraft
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Luo Y, Tixier EN, Grinspan AM. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Clostridioides difficile in High-Risk Older Adults Is Associated with Early Recurrence. Dig Dis Sci 2020; 65:3647-3651. [PMID: 32078714 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-020-06147-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is highly effective for treating recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). CDI disproportionately affects the elderly; however, there is a paucity of data on FMT effectiveness in older adults, especially subpopulations at highest risk for CDI-related morbidity and mortality. AIM To assess the efficacy and safety of FMT for CDI in older adults. METHODS A retrospective, long-term follow-up study was performed. The high-risk subpopulation included patients who were immunocompromised, patients with inflammatory bowel disease, and patients presenting with severe or fulminant colitis. Outcome measures included primary cure rates, early (< 12 weeks) and late (> 12 weeks) recurrence rates, adverse events, and subgroup analysis of higher-risk populations. RESULTS Our cohort included 75 patients (72% female) with a mean age of 76.4 and Charlson comorbidity index score of 5.4. There were 34 patients in our higher-risk subpopulation as defined above with an adjusted recurrence rate of 32.1%. FMT was performed for severe or fulminant disease in 30.6% of patients with a 3-month survival rate of 73.9%. Overall, the adjusted primary cure rate was 67.2% and the adjusted CDI recurrence was 29.9% in our cohort (90% of recurrences occurred early). Most adverse events in our study were rehospitalizations for recurrent CDI. CONCLUSION Compared with previous studies of FMT efficacy, our cohort had a lower primary cure rate and higher CDI recurrence rate than previously reported, likely driven by our higher-risk subpopulations. Nevertheless, FMT should be considered early to prevent progression of CDI severity and recurrence, especially in patients who present with severe and fulminant disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuying Luo
- Department of Medicine, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
| | - Emily N Tixier
- The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1468 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Ari M Grinspan
- The Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1468 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Cheng YW, Fischer M. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Ulcerative Colitis. Are We Ready for Primetime? Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2020; 49:739-752. [PMID: 33121693 DOI: 10.1016/j.gtc.2020.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
"Patients with inflammatory bowel disease, including ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn disease, have altered gut microbiomes. The success of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection, a disease that is also marked by dysbiosis, has spurred research in applying FMT to UC. So far, 3 randomized controlled trials have demonstrated benefit in mild to moderate UC disease course after FMT. However, important questions regarding optimal stool preparation, route, and frequency of administration, as well as characteristics of the stool donor and recipient still remain."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yao-Wen Cheng
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, Room S357, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
| | - Monika Fischer
- Division of Gastroenterology, Indiana University, 550 North University Boulevard, Suite 1634, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Gill M, Blacketer C, Chitti F, Telfer K, Papanicolas L, Dann LM, Tucker EC, Bryant RV, Costello SP. Physician and patient perceptions of fecal microbiota transplant for recurrent or refractory Clostridioides difficile in the first 6 years of a central stool bank. JGH OPEN 2020; 4:950-957. [PMID: 33102769 PMCID: PMC7578309 DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.12396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Background and Aim Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a highly effective therapy for recurrent or refractory Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI). Despite inclusion in society guidelines, the uptake of FMT therapy has been variable. Physician and patient attitudes may be a barrier to evidence‐based uptake of therapies; however, data assessing attitudes regarding FMT for rCDI are limited. Methods The South Australian FMT for CDI database prospectively recorded patient outcomes of FMT for CDI from August 2013 to January 2019. A total of 93 consecutive patients who underwent FMT for rCDI in South Australia were invited to participate in a 20‐question survey regarding the patient experience of FMT. All gastroenterologists and infectious disease physicians practicing in South Australia were invited to participate in an online survey comprised of 22 questions that addressed referral experience, indications for referral, perceived risks, and regulation and funding. Results Fifty‐four patients (54/93, 58%) returned the survey, of whom 52 (96%) would recommend FMT to others, and 51 (94%) were satisfied with treatment outcome. Fifty physicians returned the online survey (50/100, 50%), of whom 23 (46%) were concerned about disease transmission risk, and 15 (30%) believed that the risk of FMT would outweigh the benefit. Infectious diseases physicians and advanced trainees had significantly greater concern regarding the potential alteration of the microbiome than gastroenterology physicians and advanced trainees (8/17 (47%) vs 6/33 (18%); P = 0.047). Conclusion Despite high levels of patient‐reported satisfaction following FMT, physician‐reported reservations exist and may present a barrier to uptake of this therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madeleine Gill
- Department of Gastroenterology The Queen Elizabeth Hospital Adelaide South Australia Australia
| | - Charlotte Blacketer
- Department of Gastroenterology The Queen Elizabeth Hospital Adelaide South Australia Australia
| | - Franco Chitti
- Department of Gastroenterology The Queen Elizabeth Hospital Adelaide South Australia Australia
| | - Karmen Telfer
- Department of Gastroenterology The Queen Elizabeth Hospital Adelaide South Australia Australia.,School of Medicine University of Adelaide Adelaide South Australia Australia
| | - Lito Papanicolas
- School of Medicine Flinders University Adelaide South Australia Australia.,Department of Infectious Diseases Royal Adelaide Hospital Adelaide South Australia Australia
| | - Lisa M Dann
- BiomeBank Adelaide South Australia Australia
| | - Emily C Tucker
- BiomeBank Adelaide South Australia Australia.,Department of Infectious Diseases Flinders Medical Centre Adelaide South Australia Australia
| | - Robert V Bryant
- Department of Gastroenterology The Queen Elizabeth Hospital Adelaide South Australia Australia.,School of Medicine University of Adelaide Adelaide South Australia Australia.,BiomeBank Adelaide South Australia Australia
| | - Samuel P Costello
- Department of Gastroenterology The Queen Elizabeth Hospital Adelaide South Australia Australia.,School of Medicine University of Adelaide Adelaide South Australia Australia.,BiomeBank Adelaide South Australia Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Voth E, Khanna S. Fecal microbiota transplantation for treatment of patients with recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2020; 18:669-676. [PMID: 32266848 DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2020.1752192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 04/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Recurrent Clostridiodes difficile infection (rCDI) is a growing public health burden, and is associated with poor patient outcomes. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a novel therapy with an aim to restore the disrupted microbiota with demonstrated success in the management of rCDI and a favorable safety profile. AREAS COVERED This review includes a comprehensive overview of a search of the literature including epidemiology of rCDI, basics of the gut microbiome, antibiotic therapy for rCDI along with rationale for safety and efficacy of FMT for rCDI. EXPERT OPINION Patients exposed to risk factors, such as antimicrobial agents, are at risk for disruption of the gut microbiome resulting in the reduction of microbial diversity and dysbiosis. Dysbiotic microbiota predispose to primary and rCDI. Strategies to improve the current and future management of rCDI are under clinical investigation, including narrow-spectrum antibiotics, monoclonal antibodies and FMT, which has shown a high success rate for rCDI. Further investigation is needed to determine optimal standardization of the methodological components of FMT including donor screening, stool preparation, storage and instillation and patient follow-up. Newer methods of microbiota replacement therapies including enema- and capsule-based therapies are under investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elida Voth
- Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Sahil Khanna
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Cheng YW, Fischer M. Clinical management of severe, fulminant, and refractoryClostridioides difficileinfection. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2020; 18:323-333. [DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2020.1730814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Yao-Wen Cheng
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Monika Fischer
- Division of Gastroenterology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kumar V, Fischer M. Expert opinion on fecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection and beyond. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2020; 20:73-81. [PMID: 31690143 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2020.1689952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2019] [Accepted: 11/04/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a procedure involving transfer of stool from a healthy donor into the intestinal tract of a diseased recipient to restore intestinal microbial composition and functionality. FMT's tremendous success in recurrent and refractory Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) catalyzed gut microbiota research and opened the door to microbiome-based therapy for various gastrointestinal and other disorders.Areas covered: We used PubMed search engine to identify significant publications in the field of CDI and FMT. Here we present an overview of the current literature on FMT's use for recurrent, non-severe, severe, and fulminant CDI and on promising future application.Expert opinion: FMT as the best tool for treatment of antibiotic-refractory CDI has gained immense popularity over the last decade. The future of gut microbiota-based therapy should include oral formulations that contain well-described ingredients in effective doses, clear mechanism of action, and excellent safety profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinod Kumar
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Monika Fischer
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Costello SP, Bryant RV. Editorial: faecal microbiota transplantation-the silver bullet for severe and fulminant Clostridioides difficile infection? Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2020; 51:180-181. [PMID: 31850561 DOI: 10.1111/apt.15584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel P Costello
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Robert V Bryant
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Zhang X, Tian H, Chen Q, Qin H, Li N. Fecal microbiota transplantation: standardization or diversification? SCIENCE CHINA. LIFE SCIENCES 2019; 62:1714-1716. [PMID: 31813093 DOI: 10.1007/s11427-019-1592-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 11/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Xueying Zhang
- Intestinal Microenvironment Treatment Center, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China
| | - Hongliang Tian
- Intestinal Microenvironment Treatment Center, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China
| | - Qiyi Chen
- Intestinal Microenvironment Treatment Center, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China
| | - Huanlong Qin
- Intestinal Microenvironment Treatment Center, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China.
| | - Ning Li
- Intestinal Microenvironment Treatment Center, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China.
| |
Collapse
|