Risk of de-novo inflammatory bowel disease among obese patients treated with bariatric surgery or weight loss medications

Impact of Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome on IBD Outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The recent surge in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) cases has paralleled a significant rise in obesity and metabolic comorbidities rates. In this article, we explore the potential influence of obesity and associated metabolic comorbidities on disease progression, complications, treatment response, surgical outcomes, health economics, and the potential impact of obesity treatment on the course of IBD.

FINDINGS

Contrary to visceral adiposity, obesity does not consistently result in an increased risk of IBD-related complications. Patients with IBD have a higher risk of acute arterial events, likely linked to systemic inflammation. Substantial evidence suggests that obesity has a negative impact on the response to IBD treatment, with this effect being most thoroughly studied in biologics and immunomodulators. The rates of overall complications and post-operative infections are higher in patients who are obese. There are limited but promising data regarding the impact of weight loss techniques, including exercise, medications, and bariatric interventions, on the outcomes in IBD. Both obesity and diabetes have adverse effects on the overall quality of life and place an increased financial burden on the IBD population. A growing body of evidence indicates a connection between obesity and associated metabolic comorbidities and negative outcomes in IBD, yet further efforts are required to fully understand this relationship.

Heavy arch: from inflammatory bowel diseases to metabolic disorders

BACKGROUND

Metabolic disorders and inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) have captured the globe during Westernisation of lifestyle and related dietary habits over the last decades. Both disease entities are characterised by complex and heterogeneous clinical spectra linked to distinct symptoms and organ systems which, on a first glimpse, do not have many commonalities in clinical practice. However, experimental studies indicate a common backbone of inflammatory mechanisms in metabolic diseases and gut inflammation, and emerging clinical evidence suggests an intricate interplay between metabolic disorders and IBD.

OBJECTIVE

We depict parallels of IBD and metabolic diseases, easily overlooked in clinical routine.

DESIGN

We provide an overview of the recent literature and discuss implications of metabolic morbidity in patients with IBD for researchers, clinicians and healthcare providers.

CONCLUSION

The Western lifestyle and diet and related gut microbial perturbation serve as a fuel for metabolic inflammation in and beyond the gut. Metabolic disorders and the metabolic syndrome increasingly affect patients with IBD, with an expected negative impact for both disease entities and risk for complications. This concept implies that tackling the obesity pandemic exerts beneficial effects beyond metabolic health.

Does cardiovascular risk matter in IBD patients?

Cardiovascular and thromboembolic risks are increasing in the population as a whole and therefore also in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Obesity is a worldwide challenge also affecting the IBD population, and a causal association with Crohn's disease may exist. IBD itself, particularly when active, is also associated with a significant risk of thromboembolic and cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarction and stroke. Cardiovascular risk is also a significant consideration when using Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and sphingosine 1 phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators to treat IBD. JAK inhibitors - such as tofacitinib - are associated with several cardiovascular and venous thromboembolic risks, including hypertension and alterations in lipid profiles - specifically, increased LDL cholesterol and triglycerides - which may contribute to atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. S1P receptor modulators pose a slightly different set of cardiovascular risks. Initially, these drugs can cause transient bradycardia and atrioventricular (AV) block, leading to bradycardia. Moreover, they may induce QT interval prolongation, which increases the risk of life-threatening arrhythmias such as torsades de pointes. Some patients may also experience hypertension as a side effect. In this context, IBD healthcare providers need to be alert to the assessment of cardiovascular risk - particularly as cardiovascular events appear to be confined to specific patient groups with pre-existing risk factors. In addition, the potential for S1P modulator drug interactions requires a higher level of vigilance in patients with polypharmacy compared to biologics. Cardiovascular risk is not static, and updated assessment will need to become part of the routine in many IBD units.

Outcomes of bariatric surgery in patients with inflammatory bowel disease from a French nationwide database

BACKGROUND

The outcomes of bariatric surgery (BS) in patients with chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remain rarely described. We aimed to evaluate the 90-day morbidity and mortality rates, and the risk of IBD complications 2 years after BS.

METHOD

Patients from the French Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d'Information (PMSI) database who underwent a primary BS between 2016 and 2018 were included. We identified patients with a previous diagnosis of IBD. Postoperative 90-day (POD90) morbidity and mortality rates were compared between the two groups. The evolution of IBD was followed 2 years after BS.

RESULTS

Between 2016 and 2018, 138 980 patients underwent primary BS, including 587 patients with IBD: 326 (55.5 per cent) with Crohn's disease (CD) and 261 (44.5 per cent) with ulcerative colitis (UC). The preferred surgical technique was sleeve gastrectomy, especially in the IBD group (81.1 per cent), followed by gastric bypass (14.6 per cent). Patients with IBD had more comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index of 1 or more, hypertension, and diabetes; P < 0.001) than those without IBD. The POD90 mortality rate did not differ between the two groups (0.049 per cent in the IBD group versus 0 per cent in the non-IBD group), but more unscheduled rehospitalizations at POD90 were observed in patients with IBD (6.0 per cent versus 3.7 per cent; P = 0.004). Two years after BS, 86 patients (14.6 per cent) in the IBD group had at least one unplanned readmission for the management of their IBD; 15 patients stayed for 3 or more days. After multivariable analysis, patients with CD had an independent elevated risk of IBD-related unplanned readmissions 2 years after BS versus UC (adjusted odds ratio 1.90, 95 per cent c.i. 1.22 to 2.97; P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

In a highly selected cohort of patients with well-controlled IBD, BS did not result in added mortality or morbidity. A point of vigilance must be underlined regarding BS in patients with CD.

De Novo Inflammatory Bowel Disease Following Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The incidence of both obesity and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is rising globally. The influence of bariatric metabolic surgery (BMS) upon IBD development is largely unknown. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the relationship between BMS and the risk of de novo IBD development following surgery. A systematic literature search and meta-analysis were performed using PubMed and Scopus databases. Inclusion criteria were any study reporting risk of de novo IBD development following BMS relative to an appropriate control cohort. Pooled odds ratios (POR) were calculated. A total of 31 articles were identified by the literature search. Four studies including 149,385 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled estimation of a meta-analysis of risk ratios studies demonstrated a POR for the development of IBD following BMS of 1.17 (95% CI, 1.06-1.29). This indicates a 17% increase in relative risk of de novo IBD development for those patients receiving BMS compared to those treated by non-surgical methods. Based on the present data, there appears to be an association between BMS and risk of de novo IBD. Compared to the proven benefits of BMS on other aspects of patient health, this potential risk remains proportionally low but may be an important consideration for patients both pre- and post-operatively.

Exploring the Relationship Between Bariatric Surgery and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review

Background

Obesity affects over 40% of Americans. Bariatric surgery is an increasingly popular and well-studied method to achieve weight loss, improve metabolic homeostasis, and resolve obesity-related comorbid conditions. While the impact of bariatric surgery on weight loss and metabolic health has been extensively studied, there is an increasing body of literature characterizing the impact of bariatric surgery on gastrointestinal health and inflammation. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) leads to inflammation in both the small and large intestine, and leads to significant patient morbidity. Similar to obesity, the incidence of IBD is also rising. Patients with IBD and obesity may seek bariatric surgery. The impact of bariatric surgery on IBD is not well understood, but critical to understand for optimal patient care. Herein, we review the currently available literature on the impact of bariatric surgery on IBD including common trends, discrepancies in findings, and remaining knowledge gaps in need of further study.

Methods

A systematic review of the PubMed/MEDLINE database using PRISMA guidelines was performed.

Results

We identified 12 manuscripts discussing de novo IBD after bariatric surgery and 16 studying bariatric surgery in patients with pre-existing IBD. Overall, bariatric surgery appears to be safe in patients with pre-existing IBD but may increase the risk of developing de novo IBD.

Conclusions

Further research into optimal surgical approaches, patient selection, and mechanisms on how bariatric surgery impacts IBD is needed.

Development of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in HIV Patients: A Danish Cohort Study (1983–2018) With American Validation (1999–2018)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is associated with several immune-mediated disorders. However, the risk of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in people living with HIV (PLWH) remains unclear. We aimed to assess the risk of IBD among PLWH using a nationwide, population-based Danish cohort and to validate findings in a large American insurance-based database.

METHODS

Using Danish registries (1983-2018), we identified 8995 PLWH and age- and sex-matched them to 449,750 HIV-negative individuals. Cox regression analysis was undertaken to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for IBD diagnosis. Results were stratified by sex, age, and year of HIV diagnosis. Using an American insurance-based cohort, Explorys (1999-2018), we assessed the prevalence odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI of IBD diagnosis in PLWH compared with HIV-negative individuals.

RESULTS

IBD diagnosis among PLWH in Denmark was increased (HR: 2.25, 95% CI: 1.78-2.83) compared with matched HIV-negative individuals. This was seen for both Crohn's disease (HR: 2.25, 95% CI: 1.47-3.44) and ulcerative colitis (HR: 2.24, 95% CI: 1.70-2.96) and in male (HR: 2.75, 95% CI: 2.15-3.52) but not female (HR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.48-1.79) PLWH. Explorys analysis also showed an increased odds of IBD diagnoses among PLWH (OR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.35-1.49).

CONCLUSION

This study finds an increased risk of IBD diagnosis among PLWH in both a Danish and US cohort, highlighting a need to consider IBD in PLWH with new-onset gastrointestinal symptoms. Further research into the role of antiretroviral therapy in this relationship is required.

The risk of inflammatory bowel disease after bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

The association between bariatric surgery and new onset of inflammatory bowel disease has so far only been sparsely studied and with conflicting results.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association between bariatric surgery and inflammatory bowel disease in a large population-based cohort.

SETTING

Nationwide in Sweden.

METHODS

This population-based retrospective cohort study included Swedish individuals registered in the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry who underwent primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy during 2007-2018. Ten control individuals from the general population were matched according to age, sex, and region of residence at time of exposure. The study population was followed until 2019 with regard to the development of inflammatory bowel disease. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare disease-free survival time between subgroups and control individuals for each outcome.

RESULTS

The final cohort consisted of 64,188 exposed individuals with a total follow-up of 346,860 person-years and 634,530 controls with total follow-up of 3,444,186 person-years. Individuals who underwent Roux-en-Y-gastric bypass had an increased risk of later development of Crohn's disease (hazard ratio [HR] 1.8, 95% CI 1.5-2.2) and unclassified inflammatory bowel disease (HR 2.7, 95% CI 2.0-3.7) but not ulcerative colitis (HR .9, 95% CI .8-1.1) compared with control individuals, whereas individuals who underwent sleeve gastrectomy had an increased risk of ulcerative colitis (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-3.1) but not Crohn's disease (HR .8, 95% CI .3-2.1) and unclassified inflammatory bowel disease (HR 2.5, 95% CI .8-7.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was associated with increased risk of Crohn's disease and unclassified inflammatory bowel disease, whereas sleeve gastrectomy was associated with increased risk of ulcerative colitis only.

Effectiveness of recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Patients with Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at an increased risk of developing herpes zoster (HZ). The effectiveness of the recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) in patients with IBD is unknown.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study using Explorys (October 2017-April 2020; IBM Corporation, Somers, NY, USA), the effectiveness of RZV for the prevention of HZ in patients with IBD ≥ 50 years was compared to general population aged ≥ 50 years. Rates of de-novo HZ were compared between patients with IBD and the general population and stratified by number of RZV doses received. Results are presented as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

The overall proportion of IBD patients ≥ 50 years who received HZ vaccination with the live zoster vaccine (ZVL) or RZV was low (n = 11320, out of 112,200 IBD patients in the cohort). A total of 1670 patients received RZV. Receipt of the RZV resulted in a significantly lower rate of HZ in IBD patients (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.23-0.56) compared to the general population (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.59-0.92). However, despite vaccination, patients with IBD who received the RZV were still 3-times more likely to develop HZ during the study follow up period compared to the general population receiving the RZV (OR 3.06, 95% CI 1.87-5.02) and unvaccinated IBD patients were 6-times more likely to develop HZ compared to general population (OR 6.21, 95% CI 6.02-6.41).

CONCLUSION

The recombinant zoster vaccine is effective in reducing the risk of HZ in patients with IBD compared to the general population. During our follow up period, patients with IBD, however, still remain at an increased risk for HZ despite vaccination.

Bariatric Surgery and Risk of New-onset Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Nationwide Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The aim of this study was to examine the risk of new-onset inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] following bariatric surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a nationwide population-based prospective cohort study of the entire Danish population 18 to 60 years of age, alive, and residing in Denmark, from 1996 to 2018. Bariatric surgery was included as a time-dependent variable, and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios [HRs] of IBD. We used a model adjusting for age, sex, and birth cohort and a multifactor-adjusted model additionally including educational status and number of obesity-related comorbidities.

RESULTS

We followed 3 917 843 individuals of whom 15 347 had a bariatric surgery, for development of new-onset IBD. During 106 420 person-years following bariatric surgery, 100 IBD events occurred [incidence rate 0.940/1000 person-years]. During 55 553 785 person-years without bariatric surgery, 35 294 events of IBD occurred [incidence rate 0.635/1000 person-years]. This corresponded to a multifactor-adjusted hazard ratio [HR] of 1.15 (95% confidence interval[CI], 0.94-1.40) for IBD. Multifactor-adjusted HRs of Crohn's disease [CD] and ulcerative colitis [UC] were 1.85 [95% CI, 1.40-2.44] and 0.81 [95% CI, 0.61-1.08], respectively. Among women, the multifactor-adjusted HR for CD was 2.18 [95% CI, 1.64-2.90]. When limiting the study population to individuals with a diagnosis of overweight/obesity, bariatric surgery remained associated with increased risk of CD, multifactor-adjusted HR 1.59 [95% CI, 1.18-2.13].

CONCLUSIONS

This nationwide cohort study shows that bariatric surgery is associated with increased risk of development of new-onset CD, but not of UC. The underlying mechanisms remain elusive.