Targeted versus universal tuberculosis chemoprophylaxis in 1968 patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving anti-TNF therapy in a tuberculosis endemic region

Assessment and management for latent tuberculosis before advanced therapies for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: A comprehensive review

Tuberculosis (TB), caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis , is the most significant infectious cause of mortality across the globe. While TB disease can prey on immunocompetent individuals, it is more likely to occur in immunocompromised individuals. Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) are a group of diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriasis, hidradenitis suppurativa, autoimmune blistering diseases, and others) where there may be a need for systemic immunosuppression to control the disease manifestations, treat symptoms and improve long term outcomes. Immunosuppression may predispose them to active TB either from recent infection or reactivation of Latent TB (LTB). The major determinants of reactivation include the type of therapy (highest risk with TNF inhibitors and JAK inhibitors) and the underlying TB endemicity. The strategy to avoid TB reactivation includes the detection of LTB using tests that detect immunoreactivity to TB antigens (interferon-gamma release assays or tuberculin skin test) and treating LTB before or with initiation of IMID therapies. Available diagnostic tests have deficiencies in diagnostic sensitivity to detect LTB and even worse capability in predicting reactivation of TB. In addition to immunological tests, more stringent testing strategy utilizing one or many LTB equivalents may point towards subclinical TB. LTB equivalents include clinical (past history of TB, recent exposure to TB) and radiological criteria (use of chest roentgenogram, computed tomography, or, sometimes positron emission tomography - computed tomography). The present review summarizes the risk factors for TB reactivation in patients initiated on advanced therapies, geographically appropriate strategies for LTB testing, and treatment of LTB.

Reduced gut microbiota diversity in ulcerative colitis patients with latent tuberculosis infection during vedolizumab therapy: insights on prophylactic anti-tuberculosis effects

BACKGROUND

The gut microbiota plays a pivotal role in ulcerative colitis (UC) development. This study explores the impact of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) on the gut microbiota in UC and assesses changes during vedolizumab treatment, investigating prophylactic anti-tuberculosis therapy.

RESULTS

This cohort study included adult patients with UC receiving vedolizumab treatment at Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University from April 2021 to December 2022. Patients were divided into LTBI (n = 24) and non-LTBI (n = 21) groups. Patients in the LTBI group were further subdivided into prophylactic (n = 13) and non-prophylactic (n = 11) groups. Clinical and fecal samples were collected pre- and post-vedolizumab treatment for the LTBI groups and pre-treatment for the non-LTBI group. The gut microbiota was analyzed using 16 S rRNA sequencing. Patients in the non-LTBI group exhibited higher diversity indices. Vedolizumab demonstrated efficacy in the LTBI group, with clinical response and remission rates of 83.3% and 75.0%, respectively. The gut microbiota diversity in the LTBI group increased post-vedolizumab treatment, and receiving prophylactic isoniazid showed no significant difference in vedolizumab treatment response compared to not receiving prophylactic isoniazid. Microbiota changes were similar between groups, with an increase in [Ruminococcus] expression after vedolizumab treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This cohort study, conducted at a single center, highlights that LTBI can reduce gut microbiota diversity among adult patient with UC. The observed efficacy of vedolizumab treatment in the LTBI group indicates a potential association with microbiota changes. However, mono-isoniazid exhibited limited impact, underscoring the potential of vedolizumab as a promising candidate for prophylactic anti-tuberculosis treatment in the context of UC.

Risk of Tuberculosis and Hepatitis B Reactivation in Patients With Crohn's Disease on Ustekinumab: A Nationwide Real-World Study

BACKGROUND

Ustekinumab (UST) was approved in China for moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (CD) in 2020. The prevalence rates of tuberculosis and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection are high in China, and no guideline clearly states that tuberculosis chemoprophylaxis or prophylactic anti-HBV therapy should be prescribed before UST administration. This study aimed to assess the risk of tuberculosis and HBV reactivation in CD patients with latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and previous HBV infection receiving UST.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective cohort study was carried out at 68 hospitals in China to assess 721 adult CD cases administered UST between May 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021. CD and concurrent LTBI or HBV carrier were included. Hepatitis B serology, T-SPOT.TB, and tuberculin skin tests were performed at baseline. The primary outcome was tuberculosis or HBV reactivation.

RESULTS

Patients with CD-concomitant LTBI or who were HBV carriers receiving UST therapy were retrospectively enrolled from 15 hospitals in China. A total of 53 CD with LTBI patients and 17 CD with HBV carrier patients receiving UST were included. Treatment and follow-up durations were 50 ± 20 weeks and 50 ± 15 weeks in the LTBI and HBV carrier groups, respectively. A total of 25 CD patients with LTBI underwent chemoprophylaxis and 28 did not. A total of 11 HBV carriers had antiviral prophylaxis and 6 did not. No patient experienced tuberculosis or HBV reactivation or liver dysfunction during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

UST was safe for treatment of CD because no patient developed tuberculosis, persistent hepatitis, or acute liver failure during therapy, whether with a prophylactic regimen or not, based on our sample size and limited follow-up time.

Latent tuberculosis infection in myasthenia gravis patients on immunosuppressive therapy: high incidence yet moderate reactivation rate

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppressive therapies (ISTs) are mainstays for management of myasthenia gravis (MG). Meanwhile, latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is common in the setting of high-burden countries. However, the prevalence of LTBI among MG patients and whether receiving ISTs for MG would aggravate LTBI reactivation remain unknown.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the frequency of LTBI via interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) positivity among hospitalized MG patients from both rural and urban areas in a tertiary hospital, and those receiving ISTs were followed up to investigate the reactivation risk of LTBI.

RESULTS

A total of 300 MG patients with determinate IGRA results were enrolled, where the frequency of LTBI was 35.0%. Male (OR = 1.910, 95% CI: 1.181-3.089, p = .008) and elderly (OR = 1.044, 95% CI: 1.027-1.061, p < .001) patients were prone to LTBI. Of those with LTBI, 78 individuals on ISTs were successfully followed up for a median duration of 18.3 (8.5-24.0) months, of which 25 (32.1%) received anti-tuberculosis (TB) treatments. The rate of various degrees of adverse events was 82.1% over the course of the follow-up, but was not different between individuals with and without therapies against TB (χ2 < 0.001, p > .999). Only 1 patient eventually reported lymph node and intestinal TB, with the incidence rate of LTBI reactivation preliminarily estimated to be 0.81 per 100 person years.

CONCLUSION

The frequency of LTBI is high in our MG cohort, especially among those with advanced age and males. However, receiving immunosuppressives seems not to increase the risk of LTBI reactivation. LTBI screening is strongly recommended for all MG patients ready to receive ISTs, while preventive anti-TB chemotherapy should be prescribed after weighing potential benefits against the risk of side effects in those with LTBI. In-depth investigation is still entailed to further verify these findings due to the limitation of the retrospective single-center design of our study.

Regional risk of tuberculosis and viral hepatitis with tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor treatment: A systematic review

Background: TNFα inhibitors are regularly used to treat autoimmune diseases. Tuberculosis (TB) and viral hepatitis B are considered potential infectious complications, and screening and surveillance are therefore recommended. Current guidelines do not take into account regional differences in endemicity of these infections. Methods: A systematic literature review of TB and viral hepatitis in patients receiving TNFα-inhibitors was performed, searching in PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE and Web of Science databases. Studies were selected against predefined eligibility criteria and assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The number of TB and viral hepatitis cases/1,000 TNFα-inhibitor patients were evaluated, and regional variation compared. Results: 105 observational studies involving over 140,000 patients were included. Overall, 1% of patients developed TB or viral hepatitis B. TB cases/1,000 TNFα-inhibitor patients were 4-fold higher in Asia, Africa, and South America than in Europe, North America, and Australasia where only 0%-0.4% of patients developed TB. Hepatitis B cases/1,000 patients were over 15-fold higher in countries with high prevalence (China, Taiwan, South Korea, Thailand) compared with low prevalence (p < 0.00001) where only 0.4% of patients developed hepatitis B. Only three of 143 patients developed viral hepatitis C, and there was insufficient data to allow regional sub-analysis. Conclusion: TB and viral hepatitis B infections in patients treated with TNFα inhibitors are largely confined to countries with high prevalence of these infections. As only 1/2,500 patients in low prevalence countries treated with TNFα inhibitors develop TB or viral hepatitis B, we suggest an individualized, risk-based approach, rather than universal screening for all patients.

Stringent screening strategy significantly reduces reactivation rates of tuberculosis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease on anti-TNF therapy in tuberculosis endemic region

BACKGROUND

Anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy use in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) leads to an increased risk of tuberculosis (TB) reactivation despite latent tuberculosis (LTB) screening, especially in TB endemic regions.

AIM

We evaluated the effect of stringent screening strategy and LTB prophylaxis on TB reactivation.

METHODS

We performed an ambispective comparison between patients who received anti-TNF therapy after January 2019 (late cohort) and between Jan 2005 and Jan 2019 (early cohort). Late cohort patients were subjected to stringent screening criteria which included all: history of past TB/recent contact with active TB, chest X-ray, CT (computed tomography) chest, IGRA (interferon-gamma release assay), TST (tuberculin skin test), and if any positive were given chemoprophylaxis. A cohort comparison was done to evaluate for risk reduction of TB following the stringent screening strategy.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-one patients (63: ulcerative colitis/108: Crohn's disease, mean age diagnosis: 28.5 ± 13.4 years, 60% males, median follow-up duration after anti-TNF: 33 months [interquartile range: 23-57 months]) were included. Among the 112 in the early cohort, 29 (26%) underwent complete TB screening, 22 (19.6%) had LTB, 10 (9%) received chemoprophylaxis, and 19 (17%) developed TB. In comparison, in the late cohort, 100% of patients underwent complete TB screening, 26 (44%) had LTB, 23 (39%) received chemoprophylaxis, and only 1(1.7%) developed TB (p < 0.01). On survival analysis, patients in early cohort had a higher probability of TB reactivation compared with the late cohort (HR: 14.52 (95% CI: 1.90-110.61 [p = 0.01]) after adjusting for gender, age at anti-TNF initiation, concomitant immunosuppression, anti-TNF doses, and therapy escalation.

CONCLUSION

The high risk of TB reactivation with anti-TNF therapy in TB endemic regions can be significantly mitigated with stringent LTB screening and chemoprophylaxis.