Pregnancy outcomes following periconceptional or gestational exposure to ustekinumab: Review of cases reported to the manufacturer's global safety database

Safety of Vedolizumab and Ustekinumab Compared With Anti-TNF in Pregnant Women With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Limited data are available on the consequences of prenatal exposure to vedolizumab and ustekinumab. We aimed to compare the safety of vedolizumab and ustekinumab with that of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) in pregnant women with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD).

METHODS

Using nationwide, comprehensive data of the EPI-MERES registry, we identified pregnancies in women with IBD in France, exposed to anti-TNF, vedolizumab, and ustekinumab between 2014 and 2021. We compared pregnancy outcomes and complications in the offspring according to treatment exposure during pregnancy. We applied a propensity score matching for maternal, IBD, and pregnancy characteristics.

RESULTS

Three hundred ninety-eight pregnancies exposed to vedolizumab were compared with 1592 pregnancies exposed to anti-TNF; 464 pregnancies exposed to ustekinumab were compared with 1856 pregnancies exposed to anti-TNF. Overall, compared with anti-TNF, neither vedolizumab nor ustekinumab was associated with increased risks of abortion, caesarean section, stillbirth, preterm birth, serious infections, malignancies, or congenital abnormality in children. Women exposed to ustekinumab had an increased risk of small for gestational age births.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the safety of vedolizumab and ustekinumab compared with anti-TNF use during pregnancy is reassuring. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Need for individualized counseling regarding psoriasis systemic therapy in women of childbearing age: analysis of the PsoFem study at the University Medical Center Hamburg

Background

For patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and current childbearing/pregnancy, the choice of therapy is limited.

Objectives

The present study compared the disease burden and treatment choices in women of childbearing age (WoCBA) with and without a current wish for pregnancy.

Methods

Female patients aged 18 to 45 years, with moderate-to-severe psoriasis vulgaris, were consecutively recruited. The patients reported on sociodemographic/reproductive characteristics and quality of life impairments. The physicians assessed disease severity, comorbidities, and current treatment(s). Both patients' and dermatologists' perceptions of shared decision-making for the current systemic treatment were surveyed.

Results

Participants were 145 WoCBA with psoriasis: 73 were pregnant or reported a desire to conceive (group CB+) and 72 reported no wish to have (more) children (group CB-). Patients without childbearing wishes were older and often had previous children; no significant differences in clinical features or quality of life impairments were found. A significantly higher proportion of patients in the CB+ group were prescribed tumor necrosis factor alpha blockers, particularly certolizumab pegol. This treatment option was associated with previous children and the desire to conceive, but not with disease variables. Family planning was more often discussed and considered in the clinical decision for the CB+ group, but patient-doctor agreement for shared decision-making was fair-to-moderate.

Limitations

The small sample size prevented comparative analyses between patients planning a pregnancy in the short- vs long-term future. In addition, specific variables related to the decision-making process for the current therapy need to be assessed and examined in more detail in further research.

Conclusion

For WoCBA with childbearing wishes, tumor necrosis factor alpha blockers were most frequently prescribed, in accordance with current guidelines/recommendations. Decision-making for continuing or changing systemic therapy during pregnancy must take into account medication specificities and the vulnerable stages in pregnancy, as well as the limited amount of pregnancy-compatible drugs.

Navigating Reproductive Care in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Comprehensive Review

Inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] is often diagnosed in patients during their reproductive years. It is crucial that both healthcare providers and patients are adequately informed to avoid misguided decisions regarding family planning. One of the most important aspects during conception and pregnancy is to maintain disease remission, as disease activity is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Apart from methotrexate, most conventional drugs used in IBD are considered low risk during conception and pregnancy. For newer agents, evidence is still limited. If needed, surgery must not be postponed and should ideally be performed in specialized centres. In most patients, delivery should be vaginal except for patients with complex perianal disease, with an ileoanal pouch anastomosis, or if there is an obstetric contraindication. In children exposed to biological treatments during pregnancy, the risk of infections appears to be low, and psychomotor development is probably not affected. Regarding immunizations, the standard vaccination schedule for inactivated vaccines should be followed for children exposed to biologics in utero. In the case of live vaccines, such as rotavirus, decisions should be individualized and take into consideration the risk-benefit ratio, particularly in developing countries. In this review, we provide a comprehensive and updated overview of aspects related to fertility, pregnancy, breastfeeding, and the impact on the care of children born to mothers with IBD. Both the available evidence and areas of uncertainty are discussed, with the goal of assisting healthcare professionals caring for IBD patients during this important stage of their lives.

A guide to prescribing systemic treatments for psoriasis during pregnancy, breastfeeding and in those trying to conceive: what does the current evidence suggest?

Psoriasis is a common inflammatory skin condition with an estimated prevalence of 1.5% in the UK. Its management has evolved rapidly over the past 15 years as our understanding of its pathogenesis has progressed. Treatment initiation often overlaps with peak reproductive years, posing specific therapeutic challenges for individuals hoping to conceive. Certain systemic agents are well established to be teratogenic during pregnancy, such as methotrexate and acitretin, but data on newer drug classes for psoriasis remain limited. This literature review evaluated recent data on the systemic agents for psoriasis, explicitly considering the context of male and female fertility, pregnancy and breastfeeding. Our goal was to equip clinicians with an accessible, concise summary of up-to-date evidence to help them educate patients and facilitate informed, shared decision-making aligned with their reproductive health.

[Old and New Biologics and Small Molecules in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Anti-interleukins]

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, is a chronic inflammatory disease of the gastrointestinal tract. The introduction of biologics, particularly anti-interleukin (IL) agents, has revolutionized IBD treatment. This review summarizes the role of ILs in IBD pathophysiology and describes the efficacy and positioning of anti-IL therapies. We discuss the functions of key ILs in IBD and their potential as therapeutic targets. The review then discusses anti-IL therapies, focusing primarily on ustekinumab (anti-IL-12/23), risankizumab (anti-IL-23), and mirikizumab (anti-IL-23). Clinical trial data demonstrate their efficacy in inducing and maintaining remission in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. The safety profiles of these agents are generally favorable. However, long-term safety data for newer agents are still limited. The review also briefly discusses emerging therapies such as guselkumab and brazikumab. Network meta-analyses suggest that anti-IL therapies perform well compared to other biological agents. These agents may be considered first- or second-line therapies for many patients, especially those with comorbidities or safety concerns. Anti-IL therapies represent a significant advancement in IBD treatment, offering effective and relatively safe options for patients with moderate to severe disease.

Appropriate Preconception Corticosteroid-Free Remission Period in Pregnant Women With Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND

In women with inflammatory bowel disease, at least 3 months of preconception corticosteroid-free remission (CFREM) is recommended by experts in current consensus statements. However, data are lacking on the appropriate preconception remission period. We investigated the appropriate preconception CFREM period in women with ulcerative colitis to reduce maternal disease activity and adverse pregnancy outcomes (ie, preterm birth, low birth weight, and small for gestational age).

METHODS

We retrospectively examined 141 pregnancies in women with ulcerative colitis at 2 institutions. We categorized the patients into 3 subgroups by their preconception CFREM period (≥3 months, >0 to <3 months, and non-CFREM). We also investigated disease activity during pregnancy and postpartum and adverse pregnancy outcomes in each group.

RESULTS

During pregnancy, the rate of active disease was significantly lower in the ≥3 months and >0 to <3 months CFREM groups compared with that in the non-CFREM group (P < .001 and P = .0257, respectively). Postpartum, the rate of active disease was significantly lower in the ≥3 months CFREM group compared with that in the non-CFREM group (P = .0087). The preconception CFREM period of ≥3 months was an independent inhibitory factor for active disease during pregnancy and postpartum (adjusted odds ratio, 0.15; P = .0035; and adjusted odds ratio, 0.33; P = .027, respectively). Adverse pregnancy outcomes were less common in the >3 months CFREM group compared with those in the other groups, but this difference was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

A preconception CFREM period of more than 3 months may be appropriate for better maternal and adverse pregnancy outcomes, as recommended in consensus statements.

Safety and Monitoring of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Advanced Therapies

The recent approval of new medications with novel mechanisms of action and emergence of updated safety information for existing therapies has changed the treatment landscape of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). These advances led to unique adverse effect profiles and identification of new safety signals, resulting in the evolution of the safety, monitoring, and positioning of IBD therapies. In this updated review, we (1) examine the existing and updated safety data of monoclonal antibodies and small molecules for IBD, with a focus on recently Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved therapies, and (2) propose risk stratification and assessment considerations prior to and during IBD treatment.

Ustekinumab as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis - national extended follow-up and a review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Ustekinumab use in ulcerative colitis had shown low adverse event and high persistence rates to 3 years via the UNIFI long-term extension study. Outcomes beyond 3 years have not been previously described. We describe the safety signals of the entire UNIFI Australian population beyond 3 years.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter observational cohort study recruited from all Australian UNIFI centers. The primary outcome was safety via adverse events. Secondary outcomes included the clinical relapse rate on ustekinumab, and the need to switch from ustekinumab to an alternate agent.

RESULTS

There were 14 patients [11 male, mean age 47 (±14) years], with a median diagnosis of 10.8 (±4.5) years prior to UNIFI enrollment. Median follow-up was 298 weeks (5.7 years) (Interquartile range (IQR): 220-311 weeks). Within the long-term extension, there were three serious adverse events and one minor event. 42.9% (6/14) patients had clinical relapses, of which clinical remission was recaptured in 83.3% (5/6). 85.7% (12/14) persisted on ustekinumab in the long-term, with 7.1% (1/14) electively ceasing ustekinumab and 7.1% (1/14) changed from ustekinumab due to clinical relapse.

CONCLUSION

For moderate-to-severe UC in Australia, ustekinumab maintained efficacy beyond 3 years with a high persistence rate and no new safety signals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial is registered at ANZCTR (identifier: ACTRN12622001332718).

New drugs for the treatment of IBD during conception, pregnancy, and lactation

The management of inflammatory bowel disease requires continuous medical therapy to achieve and maintain disease control. Thus, women can be exposed to different drugs during conception, pregnancy, and lactation with potentially harmful effects on the mother, foetus, or nursing infant. Conventional drugs and anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α are considered safe and can be maintained throughout all these phases. Emergent, although limited, data support safety of vedolizumab and ustekinumab, with pregnancy, as well as maternal and neonatal outcomes comparable to women unexposed or treated with anti TNF-α drugs. Placental pharmacokinetics differ between these two biologics, with an inverse infant-to-maternal ratio for vedolizumab, whereas ustekinumab shows a similar profile to anti TNF-α drugs. The clearance of vedolizumab in exposed offspring seems to be faster than anti TNF-α, estimated around 15 and 19 weeks of age, respectively. Currently, the decision to interrupt or maintain these treatments is up to physicians' judgement on a case-by-case basis. In animal studies, Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and ozanimod have shown embryotoxicity and teratogenicity. Moreover, tofacitinib and filgotinib seemingly affect female fertility. This review summarizes all existing data on the effects of administration of non-anti-TNF-α biologic agents and small molecules, during conception, pregnancy, and lactation.

Choosing Therapy for Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease

The availability of approved therapies for Crohn's disease has significantly increased over the past decade. To choose the appropriate therapy for the patient, ideally head to head studies, and data on positioning could help the provider individualize the decision. Due to the paucity of head-to-head trial data, we turn to network meta-analysis and real-world studies to help guide our treatment choices. Ultimately, the best approach is to consider each patient on an individual basis, taking into consideration the characteristics of their disease, individual risk factors, extra-intestinal manifestations, co-morbid conditions, patient age, cost, and personal preferences. In this review, we summarize the evidence comparing biologic as well as small molecule therapies for the treatment of moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease. We have summarized the evidence in relation to factors such as efficacy, fistulizing disease, pregnancy, infection risk, and co-existing conditions.

Role of ustekinumab in treatment of ulcerative colitis: a narrative review

The therapeutic armamentarium for gastroenterologists in treating ulcerative colitis (UC) has been rapidly growing since the introduction of monoclonal antibodies directed against anti-TNFs. Ustekinumab is a monoclonal antibody binding the shared p40 subunit of IL-12 and IL-23, and the inhibition of these two cytokines, implicated in host response to microbial pathogens, has demonstrated clinical efficacy in different immune-mediated diseases, including moderate-to-severe UC. This narrative review summarizes the newest clinical evidence regarding the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in moderate-to-severe UC, including specific situations (pregnancy, breastfeeding, elderly/pediatric populations, extraintestinal manifestations, acute severe UC, pouchitis and dual biological therapy). Finally, positioning is discussed in light of the existing evidence.

Pregnancy and medications for inflammatory bowel disease: An updated narrative review

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is often diagnosed during the peak reproductive years of young women. Women with active IBD around conception are at a significantly increased risk of disease relapse during pregnancy, which is associated with poor pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. Given these substantial risks, it is prudent that disease remission should ideally be achieved before conception. Unfortunately, some patients may experience a disease flare-up even if they are in a state of remission before pregnancy. Patients must continue their IBD medications to reduce the risk of disease flare and subsequent poor outcomes during the gestational and postpartum periods. When treating IBD flare-ups during pregnancy, the management is quite similar to the therapeutic approach for non-pregnant patients with IBD, including 5-aminosalicylate, steroids, calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), and biologic therapies. While the data regarding the safety of CNIs in pregnant women with IBD is limited, the findings in our recent meta-analysis suggest that CNIs may be safer to use in those with IBD than in solid organ transplant recipients. There are several types of biologics and small-molecule therapies currently approved for IBD, and physicians should thoroughly understand their clinical benefits and safety profiles when utilizing these treatments in the context of pregnancy. This review highlights recent studies, including our systematic review and meta-analysis, and discusses the clinical advantages and safety considerations of biologics and small molecules for pregnant women with IBD.

Pregnancy and Crohn's disease: concerns and assurance of medical therapy

Approximately 50% of patients with inflammatory bowel disease including both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are female with many being diagnosed and treated during their reproductive years. It is important for women to be in remission prior to and during pregnancy. There have been many advances in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, including new therapies. In this review, we summarize the currently approved medications for Crohn's disease and their safety in pregnancy and postpartum. The totality of evidence suggests that the majority of therapies are low-risk before and during pregnancy, and should be continued to control maternal disease.