Crohn's disease shared decision making intervention leads to more patients choosing combination therapy: a cluster randomised controlled trial

Shared decision-making improves adherence to mesalamine in ulcerative colitis: A prospective, multicenter, non-interventional cohort study in Germany

BACKGROUND

Mesalamine is the recommended first-line treatment for inducing and maintaining remission in mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis (UC). However, adherence in real-world settings is frequently suboptimal. Encouraging collaborative patient-provider relationships may foster better adherence and patient outcomes.

AIM

To quantify the association between patient participation in treatment decision-making and adherence to oral mesalamine in UC.

METHODS

We conducted a 12-month, prospective, non-interventional cohort study at 113 gastroenterology practices in Germany. Eligible patients were aged ≥ 18 years, had a confirmed UC diagnosis, had no prior mesalamine treatment, and provided informed consent. At the first visit, we collected data on demographics, clinical characteristics, patient preference for mesalamine formulation (tablets or granules), and disease knowledge. Self-reported adherence and disease activity were assessed at all visits. Correlation analyses and logistic regression were used to examine associations between adherence and various factors.

RESULTS

Of the 605 consecutively screened patients, 520 were included in the study. The median age was 41 years (range: 18-91), with a male-to-female ratio of 1.1:1.0. Approximately 75% of patients reported good adherence at each study visit. In correlation analyses, patient participation in treatment decision-making was significantly associated with better adherence across all visits (P = 0.04). In the regression analysis at 12 months, this association was evident among patients who both preferred and received prolonged-release mesalamine granules (odds ratio = 2.73, P = 0.001). Patients reporting good adherence also experienced significant improvements in disease activity over 12 months (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Facilitating patient participation in treatment decisions and accommodating medication preferences may improve adherence to mesalamine. This may require additional effort but has the potential to improve long-term management of UC.

Can shared decision-making interventions increase trust/trustworthiness in the physician-patient encounter? A scoping review

OBJECTIVES

To summarize the existing literature on the impact of shared decision-making (SDM) interventions on patient trust, with a focus on the specific characteristics that influence the effectiveness of each intervention regarding the outcome of trust.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of the literature with the aid of a research librarian. Data was extracted via Covidence regarding the characteristics of the study including interventions performed, trust scale used, primary and secondary outcomes, and effect size.

RESULTS

From 6090 articles, 97 met criteria for full text review and 20 met inclusion criteria. Sixteen of these were original studies while the remaining 4 were secondary analyses. Eight studies reported a statistically significant increase in trust within the intervention group compared to controls while 12 reported no statistically significant changes. None had trust as a primary outcome.

CONCLUSION

Interventions aimed at increasing SDM have the ability to increase trust, but do not always succeed at doing so.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

The results indicate that increasing SDM can improve trust in the physician-patient relationship, especially when SDM results in improved communication from clinicians. Further studies should look at populations with low baseline trust since a ceiling effect can occur with trust scales.

Psychological interventions for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Persons with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have an increased risk of suffering from psychological problems. The association is assumed to be bi-directional. Psychological treatment is expected to improve quality of life (QoL), psychological issues and, possibly, disease activity. Many trials have tested various psychotherapy approaches, often in combination with educational modules or relaxation techniques, with inconsistent results.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of psychological interventions on quality of life, emotional state and disease activity in persons of any age with IBD.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched Web of Science Core Collection, KCI-Korean Journal Database, Russian Science Citation Index, MEDLINE, Psyndex, PsycINFO, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and LILACS from inception to May 2023. We also searched trial registries and major gastroenterological and selected other IBD-related conferences from 2019 until 2023.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials of psychological interventions in children or adults with IBD compared to no therapy, sham (i.e. simulated intervention), or other active treatment, with a minimum follow-up time of two months, were eligible for inclusion, irrespective of publication status and language of publication. Interventions included psychotherapy and other non-pharmacological interventions addressing cognitive or emotional processing, patient education, or relaxation techniques to improve individual health status.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two raters independently extracted data and assessed the study quality using the Risk of Bias 2 Tool. Pooled standardized mean differences (SMD) for continuous outcomes and relative risks (RR) for event data were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI), based on separate random-effects models by age group, type of therapy and type of control. An SMD of 0.2 was considered a minimally relevant difference. SMD ≥ 0.4 was considered a moderate effect. Group analyses were planned to examine differential effects by type of IBD, disease activity, psychological comorbidity, therapy subtype, and treatment intensity. Statistical heterogeneity was determined by calculating the I2 statistic. Publication bias was assessed by presenting a funnel plot and calculating the Eggers Test. GRADE Profiling was used to describe the certainty of the evidence for relevant results.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty-eight studies were eligible. Of these, 48 had results reported in sufficient detail for inclusion in the meta-analyses (6111 adults, 294 children and adolescents). Two trials were excluded from the meta-analysis following sensitivity analysis and tests for asymmetry because of implausible results. Most studies used multimodular approaches. The risk of bias was moderate for most outcomes, and high for some. The most common problems in individual trials were the inability to blind participants and investigators and outcome measures susceptible to measurement bias. The main issues leading to downgrading of the certainty of the evidence were heterogeneity of results, low precision and high or moderate risk of bias in the included trials. Publication bias could not be shown for any of the inspected analyses. In adults, psychotherapy was slightly more effective than care-as-usual (CAU) in improving short-term QoL (SMD 0.23, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.34; I2 = 13%; 20 trials, 1572 participants; moderate-certainty), depression (SMD -0.27, 95% CI -0.39 to -0.16; I2 = 0%; 16 trials, 1232 participants; moderate-certainty), and anxiety (SMD -0.29, 95% CI -0.40 to -0.17; I2 = 1%; 15 studies, 1135 participants; moderate-certainty). The results for disease activity were not pooled due to high heterogeneity (I2 = 72%). Interventions which used patient education may also have small positive short-term effects on QoL (SMD 0.19, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.32; I2 = 11%; 12 trials, 1058 participants; moderate-certainty), depression (SMD -0.22, 95% CI -0.37 to -0.07; I2 = 11%; 7 studies, 765 participants; moderate-certainty) and anxiety (SMD -0.16, 95% CI -0.32 to 0.00; I2 = 10%; 6 studies, 668 participants; moderate-certainty). We did not find an effect of education on disease activity (SMD -0.09, 95% CI -0.28 to 0.10; I2 = 38%; 7 studies, 755 participants; low-certainty). Pooled results on the effects of relaxation techniques showed small effects on QoL (SMD 0.25, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.41; I2 = 30%; 12 studies, 916 participants; moderate-certainty), depression (SMD -0.18, 95% CI -0.35 to -0.02; I2 = 0%; 7 studies, 576 participants; moderate-certainty), and anxiety (SMD -0.26, 95% CI -0.43 to -0.09; I2 = 13%; 8 studies, 627 participants; moderate-certainty). Results for disease activity were not pooled due to high heterogeneity (I2 = 72%). In children and adolescents, multimodular psychotherapy increased quality of life (SMD 0.54, 95% CI 0.06 to 1.02; I2 = 19%; 3 studies, 91 participants; moderate-certainty). The results for anxiety were inconclusive (SMD -0.09; 95% CI 0.-64 to 0.46; 2 trials, 51 patients, very low-certainty). Pooled effects were not calculated for depressive symptoms. Disease activity was not assessed in any of the trials compared to CAU. In education, based on one study, there might be a positive effect of the intervention on quality of life (MD 7.1, 95% CI 2.18 to 12.02; 40 patients; low-certainty evidence) but possibly not on depression (MD -6, 95% CI -12.01 to 0.01; 41 patients; very low-certainty). Anxiety and disease activity were not assessed for this comparison. Regarding the effects of relaxation techniques on children and adolescents, all results were inconclusive (very low-certainty).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Psychological interventions in adults are likely to improve the quality of life, depression and anxiety slightly. Psychotherapy is probably also effective for improving the quality of life in children and adolescents. The evidence suggests that psychological interventions may have little to no effect on disease activity. The interpretation of these results presents a challenge due to the clinical heterogeneity of the included trials, particularly concerning the type and various components of the common multimodular interventions. This complexity underscores the need for further research and exploration in this area.

Factors Influencing Decision-Making Preferences Among Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study in China

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the current status and the discrepancies between anticipated and actual involvement in decision-making roles among patients with inflammatory bowel disease, as well as to explore the factors that influenced actual decision-making participation.

Patients and Methods

From December 2023 to June 2024, a convenience sampling method was employed to recruit patients with inflammatory bowel disease from the Department of Gastroenterology at a tertiary hospital in Anhui, China. A general information questionnaire, the Control Preference Scale, the All Aspects of Health Literacy Scale, and the Decision Dilemma Scale were utilized for investigation and analysis.

Results

A total of 274 patients with inflammatory bowel disease were recruited.The distribution of patients' expected participation in decision-making preferences was as follows: 68 cases (24.82%) actively, 143 cases (52.19%) shared, and 63 cases (22.99%) passively. Actual participation in decision-making roles was as follows: 39 cases (14.23%) actively, 147 cases (53.65%) shared, and 88 cases (32.12%) passively. Expected participation in decision-making preferences and actual participation in decision-making roles were moderately consistent, with a compliance rate of 69.34% and a kappa value of 0.498 (p < 0.001). The overall health literacy score was (24.34±5.47), and the decision-making dilemma score was (25.22±15.20). Factors affecting actual participation in decision-making roles included marital status, education level, Average monthly household income, current work status, type of disease diagnosis, current treatment modalities, and health literacy.

Conclusion

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease have high expectations and a genuine willingness to participate in decision-making, along with overall health literacy. However, decision-making dilemmas persist, and a discrepancy exists between expectations and actual decision-making roles. Healthcare professionals should prioritize assessing patients' individual circumstances and decision-making needs while actively engaging them in the decision-making process. Patient engagement and satisfaction can be enhanced by providing targeted and personalized strategies.

[Application of advanced treatment in chronic inflammatory bowel diseases]

BACKGROUND

The treatment options for chronic inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) have been greatly expanded due to a better understanding of the underlying pathogenesis. A total of five classes of advanced treatment are available.

OBJECTIVE

A practical overview of advanced treatment of IBD.

METHODS

Narrative review.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Advanced treatments are indicated for moderate to severe IBD. A timely use is recommended to achieve better response rates and to avoid irreversible bowel damage. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have a broad efficacy, also for extraintestinal disease manifestations. The risk of reactivation of varicella zoster virus is increased with JAK inhibitors. In high-risk patients and an age >65 years there is possibly a moderately elevated cardiovascular risk and neoplastic side effects. The integrin alpha4beta7 inhibitor vedolizumab and the interleukin (IL) 12 and 23 inhibitor ustekinumab have very good safety profiles. Selective IL-23 inhibitors are sometimes superior to ustekinumab with comparable safety profiles with respect to efficacy. The sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators ozanimod and etrasimod are approved for oral treatment of ulcerative colitis. The treatment success of the medications remains still limited and a minority of patients will not respond to every individual treatment. Thus, sequential administration of several treatments is often needed. Due to the lack of comparative studies, the personalized choice, sequence and decision for treatments are usually based on personal experience and should take patient preferences, efficacy, safety and individual patient profiles into consideration.

Crohn's disease management: translating STRIDE-II for UK clinical practice

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) characterised by endoscopic inflammation, progressive bowel damage and gastrointestinal lesions. Although treatment strategies for CD have traditionally focused on a stepwise pharmacological approach to achieve clinical remission or symptom resolution, these treatment goals correlate poorly with disease activity. Thus, achieving full clinical remission and full endoscopic healing alone may be insufficient, as patients may remain at risk of inflammatory complications. Individualised 'treat-to-target' (T2T) pharmacological and treatment approaches represent a promising strategy for improving endoscopic remission and symptom resolution among patients with CD. The Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (STRIDE) and STRIDE-II guidelines, launched in 2013 and later renewed, identified individualised targets for a T2T therapeutic approach for patients with IBD. These guidelines facilitate the individualisation of target treatment goals through evidence-based, long-term (health-related quality of life, absence of disability, endoscopic healing) and intermediate/short-term (abdominal pain, stool frequency, normalisation of biomarker levels) treatment targets, allowing patients and clinicians to consider the risk-to-benefit balance of goals and selected therapeutic strategies. This article aims to summarise the STRIDE-II guidelines and provide intellectual guidance for healthcare professionals to apply the STRIDE-II principles to current clinical practice in the United Kingdom (UK). Management recommendations for primary and secondary first-line non-responders are provided, along with suggestions for utilising the endoscopic outcomes scoring system in UK clinical practice.

Preventing and managing cardiovascular events in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases treated with small-molecule drugs, an international Delphi consensus

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and sphingosine 1 phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators are small molecule drugs (SMDs) approved for IBD treatment. Their use in clinical practice might be limited due to cardiovascular concerns. We aimed to provide guidance on risk assessment, monitoring, and management strategies, aiming to minimize potential cardiovascular risks of SMDs and to facilitate an adequate shared decision-making. A systematic literature search was conducted, and proposed statements were prepared. A virtual consensus meeting was held, in which eleven IBD physicians and two cardiovascular specialists from ten countries attended. Proposed statements were voted upon in an anonymous manner. Agreement was defined as at least 75 % of participants voting as 'agree' with each statement. Consensus was reached for eighteen statements. Available evidence does not show a higher risk of cardiovascular events with JAK inhibitors in the overall IBD population, although it might be increased in patients with an unfavorable cardiovascular profile. S1P receptor modulators may be associated with a risk of bradycardia, atrioventricular blocks, and hypertension. Cardiovascular risk stratification should be done before initiation of SMDs. Although the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with IBD on SMDs appears to be low overall, caution should still be taken in certain scenarios.

Challenges in IBD Research 2024: Pragmatic Clinical Research

Pragmatic clinical research is 1 of the 5 focus areas of the Challenges in IBD Research 2024, a multidisciplinary effort by scientists, clinicians, patients, and funders to identify priorities for patient-centric research. This summary provides a comprehensive overview of current gaps in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) clinical research and actionable approaches to address them. This review is focused on identifying research that is needed to achieve the best outcomes for patients in clinical practice. Research gaps include understanding the needs of understudied patient groups and addressing barriers to care so all patients receive optimal care, validating and using biomarkers to enable early diagnosis and result in better outcomes for adults and children with IBD, and determining the optimal sequencing of treatments (medical, surgical, adjunct) in children and adults. Inclusive pragmatic research is needed to address these gaps and lead to improvements in patient care and outcomes for all populations of patients with IBD.

Equity, expense, and expertise in biologic commissioning: adding the patient to the equation

INTRODUCTION

Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) are increasingly managed effectively with biologic medicines. However, with relatively high unit costs, there remains a meaningful pressure to ensure streamlined, equitable, and inclusive prescription of biologics in the UK. Despite an increased awareness of the benefits of patient-centric shared decision making, patients remain on the periphery of biologic selection for the treatment of IMIDs.

AREAS COVERED

We provide a patient perspective on core issues in the commissioning, prescription, and decision making around biologics for IMIDs in the UK, focusing on England. In particular, the crucial aspect of determining 'value' for different stakeholders, who necessarily have different priorities, is considered.

EXPERT OPINION

There are disparities in commissioning, access to, and prescription of biologics for IMIDs in the UK. This creates an unequal treatment model and drives patient dissatisfaction with an 'experience lottery' for the management of disease. A more transparent approach to prescribing decisions, made in close consultation with patients, is essential for improving equity and experience with biologic treatment of IMIDs.

Treat to target in Crohn's disease: A practical guide for clinicians

A treat-to-target (T2T) approach applies the principles of early intervention and tight disease control to optimise long-term outcomes in Crohn's disease. The Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (STRIDE)-II guidelines specify short, intermediate, and long-term treatment goals, documenting specific treatment targets to be achieved at each of these timepoints. Scheduled appraisal of Crohn's disease activity against pre-defined treatment targets at these timepoints remains central to determining whether current therapy should be continued or modified. Consensus treatment targets in Crohn's disease comprise combination clinical and patient-reported outcome remission, in conjunction with biomarker normalisation and endoscopic healing. Although the STRIDE-II guidelines endorse the pursuit of endoscopic healing, clinicians must consider that this may not always be appropriate, acceptable, or achievable in all patients. This underscores the need to engage patients at the outset in an effort to personalise care and individualise treatment targets. The use of non-invasive biomarkers such as faecal calprotectin in conjunction with cross-sectional imaging techniques, particularly intestinal ultrasound, holds great promise; as do emerging treatment targets such as transmural healing. Two randomised clinical trials, namely, CALM and STARDUST, have evaluated the efficacy of a T2T approach in achieving endoscopic endpoints in patients with Crohn's disease. Findings from these studies reflect that patient subgroups and Crohn's disease characteristics likely to benefit most from a T2T approach, remain to be clarified. Moreover, outside of clinical trials, data pertaining to the real-world effectiveness of a T2T approach remains scare, highlighting the need for pragmatic real-world studies. Despite the obvious promise of a T2T approach, a lack of guidance to support its integration into real-world clinical practice has the potential to limit its uptake. This highlights the need to describe strategies, processes, and models of care capable of supporting the integration and execution of a T2T approach in real-world clinical practice. Hence, this review seeks to examine the current and emerging literature to provide clinicians with practical guidance on how to incorporate the principles of T2T into routine clinical practice for the management of Crohn's disease.

Health Communication Research Informs Inflammatory Bowel Disease Practice and Research: A Narrative Review

Background

In the absence of targeted empirical evidence on effective clinical communication in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), a broad overview of existing evidence on effective communication in healthcare and available recommendations for communication in telehealth is provided and mapped onto IBD research and practice.

Methods

A narrative literature review was conducted using Pubmed and Scopus databases and snowballing literature search.

Results

Evidence-based relationship building strategies include communicating emotions, acknowledging and addressing patients' hesitancy, and ensuring continued support. A particular recommendation regarding telehealth interaction is to avoid long stretches of talk. Effective informational strategies include facilitating and supporting information exchange and considering patients' preferences in decision-making. In teleconsultations, clinicians should ask direct questions about patients' emotional state, clarify their understanding of patients' concerns and check patients' understanding, address at least one patient-reported outcome when discussing the recommended treatment, and shorten the consultation where possible. Strategies for maximizing effective clinical communication in the spoken communicative mode include using infographics and simple language, and assessing adherence at the beginning of the consultation. For teleconsultations, clinicians are advised to allow patients to explain the reason for their call at the beginning of the teleconsultation, probe additional concerns early and before ending the teleconsultation, and be mindful of technical issues such as voice delays.

Conclusions

Use of question prompt lists, decision aids, micro-lessons, and communication training interventions for clinicians could be beneficial in IBD care. Further research into the implementation of such interventions as well as clinical communication concerns specific to IBD is warranted.