Successful Medical Management of Bilateral Pneumothorax Due to Nasogastric Tube Misplacement in a Cat

A 7 yr old female spayed domestic shorthair was evaluated for suspected lily ingestion and acute vomiting. The cat had vomited suspected lily plant material before presentation, and a nasogastric tube (NGT) was placed to continue to administer activated charcoal. The NGT was passed with sedation and limited restraint. To confirm placement, a single lateral radiograph was taken, which showed that the tube was in the trachea, bronchus, through the pulmonary parenchyma, and extending into the region of the craniodorsal retroperitoneal space. The tube was subsequently removed, resulting in a tension pneumothorax. Bilateral thoracostomy tubes were placed and attached to continuous suction. The pneumothorax resolved after 2 days, the thoracostomy tubes were removed, and the cat was discharged on day 3 after admission. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first described pneumothorax complication with successful medical management secondary to routine nasogastric tube placement in a cat. This case report underscores the importance of preparedness for thoracostomy tube placement before removal of any NGT that has been confirmed to be placed through the pulmonary parenchyma.

Fatal Complications of Nasogastric Tube Misplacement in Two Dogs

Provision of enteral nutrition via the use of nasoenteric feeding tubes is a commonly used method in both veterinary and human medicine. Although case reports in human medicine have identified fatalities due to misplacement of nasogastric (NG) tubes into the tracheobronchial tree and subsequent pneumothorax, there are no case reports, to our knowledge, of fatalities in veterinary patients. This case report describes two fatalities caused by misplaced NG tubes in intubated patients (one intraoperative, one postoperative). This report highlights risk factors for feeding tube complications and methods to prevent future fatalities such as two-view radiography, two-step insertion, capnography, laryngoscopic-assisted placement, and palpation of the NG tube in the stomach. The recent fatalities discussed within this case series demonstrate that deaths as a result of NG tubes misplaced into the tracheobronchial tree occur in veterinary patients, and measures should be taken to prevent this complication.

A multicenter observational study investigating care errors, staffing levels, and workload in small animal intensive care units

OBJECTIVE

To investigate associations among care errors, staffing, and workload in small animal ICUs.

DESIGN

Multicenter observational cohort study conducted between January 2017 and September 2018.

SETTING

Three small animal teaching hospital ICUs.

ANIMALS

None.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Data on patient numbers, illness severity (assesed via the acute patient physiologic and laboratory evaluation [APPLE] score), care burden, staffing levels, technician experience/education level, and care errors were collected at each study site. Care errors were categorized as major (unanticipated arrest or death; patient endangerment through IV line, arterial catheter, chest tube or other invasive device mismanagement, or errors in drug calculation/administration) or minor. Median patient:technician ratio was 4.3 (range: 1-18). Median patient illness severity was 15.1 (4.7-27.1) APPLE score units. A total of 221 major and 3,317 minor errors were observed over the study period. The odds of a major error increased by an average of 11% (odds ratio [OR] = 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.20; P = 0.012) for each 1 patient increase in the patient:technician ratio after averaging by ICU location. The major error incident rate ratio was 2.53 (95% CI, 1.84-3.54; P < 0.001) for patient:technician ratios of >4.0 compared with ≤4.0. The odds of a major error increased by 0.5% per total unit APPLE score increase (OR = 1.005; 95% CI, 1.002-1.007; P < 0.001). The major error incident rate ratio was 1.71 (95% CI, 1.30-2.25; P < 0.001) for APPLE_fast :technician ratios of >73 compared with ≤73. The odds of a major error decreased by 2% (OR = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99; P = 0.01) for each year increase in total technician years of ICU work experience.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial reductions in major care errors may be achieved by maintaining ICU patient:technician ratios at ≤4. Technician experience and total unit burden of patient illness severity are also associated with error incidence, and should be taken into consideration when scheduling staff.