Ethics codes and use of new and innovative drugs

The Need for Institutional Policies for Innovative Therapy: Existing Approaches and Key Elements

OBJECTIVES

Innovative therapy is common in many areas of medicine. Yet, it is unknown whether medical centers have policies to ensure innovative therapy is conducted appropriately.

DESIGN

We contacted three informants at leading U.S. medical centers to determine whether the center has a policy for innovative therapy and, if so, what requirements the policies include and whether the policies lack any important elements.

SETTING

Existing policies and published recommendations.

PATIENTS

None.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Our search found that 46 of 58 responding centers (79%) do not have a policy for innovative therapy. Of the ten policies available for review, half lack requirements to report patient outcomes, and half do not explicitly coordinate innovative therapy with research.

CONCLUSIONS

A majority of leading U.S. medical centers do not have a policy for innovative therapy. In addition, existing policies lack important elements, especially with respect to reporting patient outcomes and coordinating innovative therapy with research. Based on the existing policies and recommendations in the literature, we thus identify eight key elements that should be included in policies for innovative therapy. Future research should assess whether these elements can be feasibly implemented and whether, in practice, they offer patients appropriate protection.

Political action in nursing and medical codes of ethics

Political action has a long history in the health workforce. There are multiple historical examples, from civil disobedience to marches and even sabotage that can be attributed to health workers. Such actions remain a feature of the healthcare community to this day; their status with professional and regulatory bodies is far less clear, however. This has created uncertainty for those undertaking such action, particularly those who are engaged in what could be termed 'contentious' forms of action. This study explored how advocacy and activism were presented in nursing and medical codes of ethics, comparing disciplinary and temporo-spatial differences to understand how such action may be promoted or constrained by codes. The data for this study comes from 217 codes of ethics. Because of the size of the corpus and to facilitate analysis, natural language processing was utilised, which allowed for an automated exploration of the data and for comparisons to be drawn between groups. This was complemented by a manual search and contextualisation of the data. While there were noticeable differences between medical and nursing codes, overall, advocacy, activism and even politics were rarely discussed explicitly in most codes. When such action was spoken about, this was often vague and imprecise with codes speaking of 'political action' and 'advocacy' in general terms. While some codes were far more forthright in what they meant about advocacy or broader political action (i.e., Nursing codes in Denmark, Norway, Canada) more forceful language that spoke in specific terms or in terms of oppositional or specific actions (e.g., civil disobedience or marches) was almost completely avoided. These results are discussed in relation to the broader literature on codes and the normative questions they raise, namely whether such action should be included in codes of ethics at all.

Phage Therapy-Challenges, Opportunities and Future Prospects

The increasing drug resistance of bacteria to commonly used antibiotics creates the need to search for and develop alternative forms of treatment. Phage therapy fits this trend perfectly. Phages that selectively infect and kill bacteria are often the only life-saving therapeutic option. Full legalization of this treatment method could help solve the problem of multidrug-resistant infectious diseases on a global scale. The aim of this review is to present the prospects for the development of phage therapy, the ethical and legal aspects of this form of treatment given the current situation of such therapy, and the benefits of using phage products in persons for whom available therapeutic options have been exhausted or do not exist at all. In addition, the challenges faced by this form of therapy in the fight against bacterial infections are also described. More clinical studies are needed to expand knowledge about phages, their dosage, and a standardized delivery system. These activities are necessary to ensure that phage-based therapy does not take the form of an experiment but is a standard medical treatment. Bacterial viruses will probably not become a miracle cure-a panacea for infections-but they have a chance to find an important place in medicine.

Do Physicians Have a Duty to Discuss Expanded Access to Investigational Drugs with their Patients? A Normative Analysis

Drawing on ethical and legal frameworks in the Netherlands, the United States and France, we examine whether physicians are expected to inform patients about potentially relevant opportunities for expanded access to investigational drugs. While we found no definitive legal obligation, we argue that physicians have a moral obligation to discuss opportunities for expanded access with patients who have run out of treatment options to prevent inequality, to promote autonomy, and to achieve beneficence.

Procedures for application of the extended dosing after antitumor drug clinical trials

New drug clinical trials have been considered as a positive way for treating cancer by cancer patients and doctors, and the extended dosing is a special way for patients' withdrawal from antitumor clinical trials to obtain investigational new drugs. However, neither the regulations of expanded dosing nor the detail documents for expanded dosing have been officially published in China. At present, expanded dosing of investigational drugs is still at the exploratory stage in various medical institutions, and a complete management system has not been established to meet patients' urgent needs for drug use. Based on the practical experience of extended dosing in Hunan Cancer Hospital, this paper preliminarily explored the application procedures and ethical review requirements of extended dosing for subjects in antitumor clinical trials. It is necessary to clarify the responsibilities of all patients in the procedure and establish a patient-medical institution-sponsor joint application system. In the process of ethical review, it is recommended that all parties fully consider the risks and benefits of extended dosing for patients, and then the ethics committee makes a comprehensive assessment to decide whether to approve extended dosing.

Should the governance of individual treatment attempts ("Individuelle Heilversuche") include praxis evaluation? Results from qualitative stakeholder interviews

INTRODUCTION

Individual treatment attempts (ITAs) are a German concept for the treatment of individual patients by physicians with nonstandard therapeutic approaches. Due to the lack of evidence, ITAs come with a high amount of uncertainty regarding the risk-benefit ratio. Despite the high uncertainty, no prospective review and no systematic retrospective evaluation of ITAs are required in Germany. Our objective was to explore stakeholders' attitudes toward the retrospective evaluation (monitoring) or prospective evaluation (review) of ITAs.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative interview study among relevant stakeholder groups. We used the SWOT framework to represent the stakeholders' attitudes. We applied content analysis to the recorded and transcribed interviews in MAXQDA.

RESULTS

Twenty interviewees participated and pointed to several arguments in favor of the retrospective evaluation of ITAs (e.g. knowledge gain about circumstances of ITAs). The interviewees expressed concerns regarding the validity and practical relevance of the evaluation results. The viewpoints on review addressed several contextual factors.

CONCLUSION

The current situation with a complete lack of evaluation insufficiently reflects safety concerns. German health policy decision makers should be more explicit about where and why evaluation is needed. Prospective and retrospective evaluations should be piloted in areas of ITAs with a particularly high uncertainty.

The White Coat Cape: An Ethical Analysis of Emerging Therapies to Treat Spinal Muscular Atrophy

The recent emergence of promising therapies to treat neuromuscular diseases such as spinal muscular atrophy raises important questions regarding the ethical permissibility of allowing a parent to refuse these Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs. The 3 most recent drugs targeting spinal muscular atrophy have all been approved since 2019, lack long-term data regarding potential side-effects and long-term benefits, and are costly. Indeed, onasemnogene abeparvovec-xioi (Zolgensma) has been called the most expensive drug in the world. Contemporary analyses of innovative therapies, compassionate use medications, off-label usage, and emerging therapies tend to focus on the importance of informed consent in framing the ethical dimensions of these medications. This manuscript utilizes a narrative framework of "rescue" to explore the competing perspectives of optimistic physicians and parents, who may decline the therapies finding the benefit-burden profile does not weigh in favor of their use. Ultimately, this paper concludes that such refusal should be considered ethically permissible until such time as more long-term data are available for these medications and their cost has decreased substantially.

The three horizons model applied to medical science

The three horizons model is a framework that helps manage an organization's innovation strategy. This model considers three aspects (horizons) that should be present in the institution and guide the development of new systems. Applied to medical science, the horizons are considered as paradigms that set the guidelines for clinical knowledge. New technologies can influence this model by causing disruptive changes. Horizon 1 (evidence-based medicine) reflects the current paradigm and emphasizes the aspect of continuous improvement needed to strengthen it, such as with the introduction of the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) methodology. Evidence-based medicine has made it possible to stop performing harmful interventions like autologous bone marrow or stem cell transplantation in cancer treatment for women with early poor prognosis breast cancer or to discontinue the erroneous belief that children should not sleep on their backs to prevent sudden infant death syndrome. Horizon 2 (real-world evidence) refers to a new model in which innovation has generated new capabilities. This change makes it possible to correct weaknesses of the previous paradigm, as in the case of pragmatic clinical trials. Real-world evidence has been used to show that drugs such as tofacitinib are effective without using methotrexate as background or to demonstrate the efficacy of chemotherapy in older patients with stage II colon cancer. Horizon 3 (precision medicine) involves a disruptive innovation, leading to the abandonment of the traditional mechanistic model of medical science and is made possible by the appearance of major advances such as artificial intelligence. Precision medicine has been used to assess the use of retigabine for the treatment of refractory epilepsy or to define a genome-adjusted radiation dose using a biological model to simulate the response to radiotherapy, facilitate dose adjustment and predict outcome in breast cancer.

Brolucizumab: Evaluation of Compassionate Use of a Complex Anti-VEGF Therapy

Objective

To report a consecutive series of compassionate, off-label use of intravitreal brolucizumab as a rescue therapy for complex, non-responsive macular edema. This report delineates primary diagnosis, indications for treatment, adverse events, and visual and anatomic outcomes after intravitreal brolucizumab.

Methods

A retrospective review of a consecutive clinical case series of 110 eyes treated with intravitreal brolucizumab between January 1st and March 1st. 2020. All patients were included if they received intravitreal brolucizumab in an off-label delivery and had ongoing macular edema in the setting of prior, multiple intravitreal anti-VEGF and/or intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide. All patients had spectral domain OCT documented before, at the time of, and in serial follow-up after intravitreal brolucizumab.

Results

Ninety-eight of 98 patients had marked decrease in macular edema. Indications for treatment were assigned to the primary etiologic diagnosis leading to the macular edema secondary to radiation retinopathy, complex epiretinal membrane, or complex diabetic retinopathy. In this series, sdOCT central point thickness decreased by an average of 71.5 microns, subretinal fluid resolved, and visual acuity was improved in 40% (greater than two Snellen lines) and stable in 60% (within two Snellen lines). No patient experienced a severe adverse event to specifically include vitritis and/or vasculitis.

Conclusion

In this series, brolucizumab intravitreal injection was associated with significant improvement in macular edema in each diagnostic category. No serious complications to treatment were found in this series. Brolucizumab, though associated with known intraocular inflammation and vasculitis, demonstrated marked benefit in these complex eyes previously unresponsive to aggressive intravitreal pharmacotherapy.

Ethics codes and medical decision making

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to analyze guidance about medical decision making contained in ethics codes. The primary question we address is which of the main decision-making models - informed decision making (IDM), shared decision making (SDM), or paternalism - is promoted by these codes.

METHODS

We manually searched codes of medical ethics for guidance on medical decision making. Our analysis focused on the major international code, the World Medical Association International Code of Medical Ethics (ICME), and national codes of the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the UK, Ireland, Germany, France and Norway.

RESULTS

The ICME does not promote any specific model of medical decision making. 10 of the 11 analyzed national codes contain guidance about IDM, while only four refer to SDM. Some codes contain articles which are imprecise with regard to the question of medical decision making.

CONCLUSIONS

All of the analyzed national codes should be updated or amended. In particular, given the great importance of SDM in medicine, codes which do not contain relevant guidance should be updated.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Relevant amendments introduced to ethics codes could contribute to promoting of adequate standards of medical decision making (especially those regarding SDM) among doctors.

Overcoming Challenges to Make Bacteriophage Therapy Standard Clinical Treatment Practice for Cystic Fibrosis

Individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF) are given antimicrobials as prophylaxis against bacterial lung infection, which contributes to the growing emergence of multidrug resistant (MDR) pathogens isolated. Pathogens such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa that are commonly isolated from individuals with CF are armed with an arsenal of protective and virulence mechanisms, complicating eradication and treatment strategies. While translation of phage therapy into standard care for CF has been explored, challenges such as the lack of an appropriate animal model demonstrating safety in vivo exist. In this review, we have discussed and provided some insights in the use of primary airway epithelial cells to represent the mucoenvironment of the CF lungs to demonstrate safety and efficacy of phage therapy. The combination of phage therapy and antimicrobials is gaining attention and has the potential to delay the onset of MDR infections. It is evident that efforts to translate phage therapy into standard clinical practice have gained traction in the past 5 years. Ultimately, collaboration, transparency in data publications and standardized policies are needed for clinical translation.

Translating Psychedelic Therapies From Clinical Trials to Community Clinics: Building Bridges and Addressing Potential Challenges Ahead

Research exploring the potential of psychedelic-assisted therapies to treat a range of mental illnesses is flourishing, after the problematic sociopolitical history of psychedelics led to the shutdown of clinical research for almost 40 years. Encouraged by positive results, clinicians and patients are now hopeful that further interruptions to research will be avoided, so that the early promise of these therapies might be fulfilled. At this early stage of renewed interest, researchers are understandably focusing more on clinical trials to investigate safety and efficacy, than on longer-term goals such as progression to community practice. Looking to identify and avoid potential pitfalls on the path to community clinics, the authors, a group of Australian clinicians and researchers, met to discuss possible obstacles. Five broad categories of challenge were identified: 1) inherent risks; 2) poor clinical practice; 3) inadequate infrastructure; 4) problematic perceptions; and 5) divisive relationships and fractionation of the field. Our analysis led us to propose some strategies, including public sector support of research and training to establish best practice and optimize translation, and funding to address issues of equitable access to treatment. Above all, we believe that strategic planning and professional cohesion will be crucial for success. Accordingly, our key recommendation is the establishment of a multidisciplinary advisory body, broadly endorsed and representing all major stakeholders, to guide policy and implementation of psychedelic-assisted therapies in Australia. Although these challenges and strategies are framed within the Australian context, we sense that they may generalize to other parts of the world. Wherever they apply, we believe that anticipation of potential difficulties, and creative responses to address them, will be important to avoid roadblocks in the future and keep the "psychedelic renaissance" on track.

COVID-19 and off label use of drugs: an ethical viewpoint

Background

The COVID-19 outbreak is rapidly spread over the world and kills infected patients. There is no proven medication for its treatment, so, all of the medications used for treatment are considered to be off-label. Off-label uses are not under regulation in the outbreak because there is no specific regulation for this condition.

Objectives

In this short communication we aim at describing two ways of off-label use as clinical practice or investigational use. Further, we will describe the third way of off-label use, we named it pseudo-research and then we will state the most possible ethical challenges of off-label use for better perceptions and responsibility.

Results

The WHO considers off-label uses as country-specific. All international regulatory bodies consider off-label prescription as the physician’s responsibility and legal by necessitating some requirements. There is no international guideline for regulating investigational off-label uses as clinical practice.

Conclusion

There are different types of approaches, none of them is comprehensive and conclusive. Furthermore, respecting the four ethical principles necessitates codification and strict regulation of off-label uses either as clinical practice or investigational. Besides, compilation of a special guideline based on ethical principles especially non-maleficence and autonomy for investigational off-label uses in disasters is highly recommended.

Compassionate use of unauthorized drugs: Legal regulations and ethical challenges

Compassionate use (also referred to as expanded access) is therapeutic use of unauthorized drugs outside of clinical trials. The objective of this review is to discuss practical aspects of the current legal regulations concerning compassionate use that have been introduced in the European Union, the USA (both the Food and Drug Administration regulations and Right-to-try laws), Canada and Australia. We also present main ethical challenges associated with use of unauthorized drugs such as possible difficulties with obtaining informed consent and fair patient selection. Moreover, we discuss guidelines, especially those contained in the Declaration of Helsinki, which may aid doctors in the ethical conduct of compassionate treatments.

Phage therapy: Current status and perspectives

The spread of antimicrobial resistant bacterial pathogens combined with the lack of new drug classes in the antibiotic pipeline causes a resurgence of the use of bacterial viruses (phages) to treat bacterial infections (phage therapy [PT]). There has been a substantial increase in patients subjected to this experimental therapy and emergence of new PT centers in Europe and the United States paralleled by one clinical trial completed in accord with good medical practice (GMP) requirements and a few others underway. What is more, evidence has been accumulating to suggest that phages can also exert anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory action which opens new pathways for the development of novel targets for PT. Here we present the status quo of the PT, recent regulatory, and clinical developments as well as new perspectives for its wider application in clinical medicine.

Ethics codes and use of new and innovative drugs

Treatment with new and/or innovative drugs with uncertain safety and efficacy profile is associated with substantial ethical concerns. The main objective of this paper is to present guidance on the use of such drugs contained in: (i) major international codes and guidelines pertaining to medical ethics and biomedical research; (ii) national codes of medical ethics and professional conduct of the USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the UK, Ireland, France and Germany. Out of the four international codes and guidelines analysed, only the Declaration of Helsinki addresses the question of the use of unproven drugs. Among national codes, only two (USA and New Zealand) explicitly allow for use of new or innovative drugs. Moreover, treatment with unproven drugs seems to be permissible under the French code, though this is not stated explicitly. The remaining codes do not contain any articles on the use of new and innovative drugs. An update of existing articles, as well as the addition of new guidelines to the codes, should be considered in view of the rapid pace of development and introduction to clinical practice of new drugs. This work is relevant to innovative off-label applications of approved drugs and expanded access to investigational drugs.