Meropenem pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients with or without burn treated with or without continuous veno-venous hemofiltration

Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Unbound Meropenem in Patients Undergoing Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: An Observational Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The most effective dosing strategy of meropenem for patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) remains uncertain. This study aimed to analyze the population pharmacokinetics (popPKs) of unbound meropenem and establish an appropriate dosing approach.

METHODS

This prospective study involved 19 patients for the development of a popPK model and an additional 10 for its validation. Ethical approval was obtained.

RESULTS

The clearance of unbound meropenem was influenced by the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score [=2.22 × (SOFA score/12)^1.88] and the effluent flow rate from the CRRT device, with an interindividual variability of 44.5%. The volume of distribution was affected by the simplified acute physiology score II [=23.1 × (simplified acute physiology score II/52)^1.54]. Monte Carlo simulations suggested meropenem doses ranging from 1.0 to 3.0 g/d using continuous infusion to achieve a target time above the 4 times of minimum inhibitory concentration of the unbound form (% f T >4×MIC ) of 100% for definitive therapy. For empirical therapy, a dose of 1.0 g/d using continuous infusion was recommended to target % f T >MIC of 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study developed a popPK model for unbound meropenem in patients undergoing CRRT and formulated dosing guidelines.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN000024321.

An Appraisal of Pharmacotherapy-Pertinent Literature Published in 2021 and 2022 for Clinicians Caring for Patients With Thermal or Inhalation Injury

Studies focusing on pharmacotherapy interventions to aid patients after thermal injury are a minor focus in burn injury-centered studies and published across a wide array of journals, which challenges those with limited resources to keep their knowledge current. This review is a renewal of previous years' work to facilitate extraction and review of the most recent pharmacotherapy-centric studies in patients with thermal and inhalation injury. Twenty-three geographically dispersed, board-certified pharmacists participated in the review. A Medical Subject Heading-based, filtered search returned 2336 manuscripts over the previous 2-year period. After manual review, 98 (4%) manuscripts were determined to have a potential impact on current pharmacotherapy practice. The top 10 scored manuscripts are discussed. Only 17% of those reviewed were assessed to likely have little effect on current practice. The overall impact of the current cohort was higher than previous editions of this review, which is encouraging. There remains a need for investment in well-designed, high-impact, pharmacotherapy-pertinent research for patients sustaining thermal or inhalation injuries.

Which Are the Best Regimens of Broad-Spectrum Beta-Lactam Antibiotics in Burn Patients? A Systematic Review of Evidence from Pharmacology Studies

BACKGROUND

Burn injury causes profound pathophysiological changes in the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) properties of antibiotics. Infections are among the principal complications after burn injuries, and broad-spectrum beta-lactams are the cornerstone of treatment. The aim of this study was to review the evidence for the best regimens of these antibiotics in the burn patient population.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of evidence available on MEDLINE (from its inception to 2023) of pharmacology studies that focused on the use of 13 broad-spectrum beta-lactams in burn patients. We extracted and synthetized data on drug regimens and their ability to attain adequate PK/PD targets.

RESULTS

We selected 35 studies for analysis. Overall, studies showed that both high doses and the continuous infusion (CI) of broad-spectrum beta-lactams were needed to achieve internationally-recognized PK/PD targets, ideally with therapeutic drug monitoring guidance. The most extensive evidence concerned meropenem, but similar conclusions could be drawn about piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, imipenem-clinastatin and aztreonam. Insufficient data were available about new beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations, ceftaroline, ceftobiprole and cefiderocol.

CONCLUSIONS

Both high doses and CI of broad-spectrum beta-lactams are needed when treating burn patients due to the peculiar changes in the PK/PD of antibiotics in this population. Further studies are needed, particularly about newer antibiotics.

Pharmacologic Considerations for Antimicrobials and Anticoagulants after Burn Injury

Derangements in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of burn patients are poorly understood and lacking consistent data. This leads to an absence of consensus regarding pharmacologic management of burn patients, complicating their care. In order to effectively manage burn critical illness, knowledge of pharmacologic parameters and their changes is necessary. It is also imperative that the clinician understands how these changes will affect drug dosing. A common practice is to increase antibiotic dosing and/or frequency; however, this may not be necessary and doses should be adjusted to patient- and drug-specific parameters. Additionally, monitoring assays for antibiotic levels as well as coagulation factors can be useful for adjusting dosages to best treat the patient. This review focuses on alterations in PK/PD as well as other physiologic changes after burn injury, with special reference to care in military and austere settings.

Individualized antibiotic dosage regimens for patients with augmented renal clearance

Objectives: Augmented renal clearance (ARC) is a state of enhanced renal function commonly observed in 30%-65% of critically ill patients despite normal serum creatinine levels. Using unadjusted standard dosing regimens of renally eliminated drugs in ARC patients often leads to subtherapeutic concentrations, poor clinical outcomes, and the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria. We summarized pharmaceutical, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic research on the definition, underlying mechanisms, and risk factors of ARC to guide individualized dosing of antibiotics and various strategies for optimizing outcomes. Methods: We searched for articles between 2010 and 2022 in the MEDLINE database about ARC patients and antibiotics and further provided individualized antibiotic dosage regimens for patients with ARC. Results: 25 antibiotic dosage regimens for patients with ARC and various strategies for optimization of outcomes, such as extended infusion time, continuous infusion, increased dosage, and combination regimens, were summarized according to previous research. Conclusion: ARC patients, especially critically ill patients, need to make individualized adjustments to antibiotics, including dose, frequency, and method of administration. Further comprehensive research is required to determine ARC staging, expand the range of recommended antibiotics, and establish individualized dosing guidelines for ARC patients.

Infections in Burn Patients

Infections are the leading cause of mortality in burn patients who survive their initial resuscitation. Burn injury leads to immunosuppression and a dysregulated inflammatory response which can have a prolonged impact. Early surgical excision along with support of the multidisciplinary burn team has improved mortality in burn patients. The authors review diagnostic and therapeutic challenges as well as strategies for management of burn related infections.

Beta-Lactam Probability of Target Attainment Success: Cefepime as a Case Study

Introduction: Probability of target attainment (PTA) analysis using Monte Carlo simulations has become a mainstay of dose optimization. We highlight the technical and clinical factors that may affect PTA for beta-lactams. Methods: We performed a mini review in adults to explore factors relating to cefepime PTA success and how researchers incorporate PTA into dosing decisions. In addition, we investigated, via simulations with a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model, factors that may affect cefepime PTA success. Results: The mini review included 14 articles. PTA results were generally consistent, given the differences in patient populations. However, dosing recommendations were more varied and appeared to depend on the definition of pharmacodynamic (PD) target, definition of PTA success and specific clinical considerations. Only 3 of 14 articles performed formal toxicological analysis. Simulations demonstrated that the largest determinants of cefepime PTA were the choice of PD target, continuous vs. intermittent infusion and creatinine clearance. Assumptions for protein binding, steady state vs. first dose, and simulating different sampling schemes may impact PTA success under certain conditions. The choice of one or two compartments had a minimal effect on PTA. Conclusions: PTA results may be similar with different assumptions and techniques. However, dose recommendation may differ significantly based on the selection of PD target, definition of PTA success and considerations specific to a patient population. Demographics and the PK parameters used to simulate time-concentration profiles should be derived from patient data applicable to the purpose of the PTA. There should be strong clinical rationale for dose selection. When possible, safety and toxicity should be considered in addition to PTA success.

Antibiotic Therapy in the Critically Ill with Acute Renal Failure and Renal Replacement Therapy: A Narrative Review

The outcome for critically ill patients is burdened by a double mortality rate and a longer hospital stay in the case of sepsis or septic shock. The adequate use of antibiotics may impact on the outcome since they may affect the pharmacokinetics (Pk) and pharmacodynamics (Pd) of antibiotics in such patients. Acute renal failure (ARF) occurs in about 50% of septic patients, and the consequent need for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) makes the renal elimination rate of most antibiotics highly variable. Antibiotics doses should be reduced in patients experiencing ARF, in accordance with the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), whereas posology should be increased in the case of CRRT. Since different settings of CRRT may be used, identifying a standard dosage of antibiotics is very difficult, because there is a risk of both oversimplification and failing the therapeutic efficacy. Indeed, it has been seen that, in over 25% of cases, the antibiotic therapy does not reach the necessary concentration target mainly due to lack of the proper minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) achievement. The aim of this narrative review is to clarify whether shared algorithms exist, allowing them to inform the daily practice in the proper antibiotics posology for critically ill patients undergoing CRRT.

Meropenem Population Pharmacokinetics and Dosing Regimen Optimization in Critically Ill Children Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

We aimed to develop a meropenem population pharmacokinetic model in critically ill children receiving continuous renal replacement therapy and simulate dosing regimens to optimize patient exposure.

METHODS

Meropenem plasma concentration was quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography. Meropenem pharmacokinetics was investigated using a non-linear mixed-effect modeling approach. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to compute the optimal scheme of administration, according to the target of a 100% inter-dose interval time in which concentration is one to four times above the minimum inhibitory concentration (100% fT>1-4×MIC).

RESULTS

A total of 27 patients with a median age of 4 [interquartile range 0-11] years, a median body weight of 16 [range 7-35] kg receiving continuous renal replacement therapy were included. Concentration-time courses were best described by a one-compartment model with first-order elimination. Body weight (BW) produced significant effects on volume of distribution (V) and BW and continuous renal replacement therapy effluent flow rate (Q_eff) produced significant effects on clearance (CL): [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], where V_pop and CL_pop estimates were 32.5 L and 5.88 L/h, respectively, normalized to a 70-kg BW and median Q_eff at 1200 mL/h. Using this final model and Monte Carlo simulations, for patients with Q_eff over 1200 mL/h, meropenem continuous infusion was adequate in most cases to attain 100% fT>₁-_4xMIC. For bacterial infections with a low minimum inhibitory concentration (≤2 mg/L), meropenem intermitent administration was appropriate for patients weighing more than 20 kg with Q_eff <500 mL/h and for patients weighing more than 10 kg with Q_eff <100 mL/h.

CONCLUSIONS

Meropenem exposure in critically ill children receiving continuous renal replacement therapy needs dosing adjustments to the minimum inhibitory concentration that take into account body weight and the continuous renal replacement therapy effluent flow rate.

Comparison of Piperacillin and Tazobactam Pharmacokinetics in Critically Ill Patients with Trauma or with Burn

Critical illness caused by burn and sepsis is associated with pathophysiologic changes that may result in the alteration of pharmacokinetics (PK) of antibiotics. However, it is unclear if one mechanism of critical illness alters PK more significantly than another. We developed a population PK model for piperacillin and tazobactam (pip-tazo) using data from 19 critically ill patients (14 non-burn trauma and 5 burn) treated in the Military Health System. A two-compartment model best described pip-tazo data. There were no significant differences found in the volume of distribution or clearance of pip-tazo in burn and non-burn patients. Although exploratory in nature, our data suggest that after accounting for creatinine clearance (CrCl), doses would not need to be increased for burn patients compared to trauma patients on consideration of PK alone. However, there is a high reported incidence of augmented renal clearance (ARC) in burn patients and pharmacodynamic (PD) considerations may lead clinicians to choose higher doses. For critically ill patients with normal kidney function, continuous infusions of 13.5-18 g pip-tazo per day are preferable. If ARC is suspected or the most stringent PD targets are desired, then continuous infusions of 31.5 g pip-tazo or higher may be required. This approach may be reasonable provided that therapeutic drug monitoring is enacted to ensure pip-tazo levels are not supra-therapeutic.

Pooled Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis for Exploring Ciprofloxacin Pharmacokinetic Variability in Intensive Care Patients

Background and Objective

Previous pharmacokinetic (PK) studies of ciprofloxacin in intensive care (ICU) patients have shown large differences in estimated PK parameters, suggesting that further investigation is needed for this population. Hence, we performed a pooled population PK analysis of ciprofloxacin after intravenous administration using individual patient data from three studies. Additionally, we studied the PK differences between these studies through a post-hoc analysis.

Methods

Individual patient data from three studies (study 1, 2, and 3) were pooled. The pooled data set consisted of 1094 ciprofloxacin concentration–time data points from 140 ICU patients. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling was used to develop a population PK model. Covariates were selected following a stepwise covariate modeling procedure. To analyze PK differences between the three original studies, random samples were drawn from the posterior distribution of individual PK parameters. These samples were used for a simulation study comparing PK exposure and the percentage of target attainment between patients of these studies.

Results

A two-compartment model with first-order elimination best described the data. Inter-individual variability was added to the clearance, central volume, and peripheral volume. Inter-occasion variability was added to clearance only. Body weight was added to all parameters allometrically. Estimated glomerular filtration rate on ciprofloxacin clearance was identified as the only covariate relationship resulting in a drop in inter-individual variability of clearance from 58.7 to 47.2%. In the post-hoc analysis, clearance showed the highest deviation between the three studies with a coefficient of variation of 14.3% for posterior mean and 24.1% for posterior inter-individual variability. The simulation study showed that following the same dose regimen of 400 mg three times daily, the area under the concentration–time curve of study 3 was the highest with a mean area under the concentration–time curve at 24 h of 58 mg·h/L compared with that of 47.7 mg·h/L for study 1 and 47.6 mg·h/L for study 2. Similar differences were also observed in the percentage of target attainment, defined as the ratio of area under the concentration–time curve at 24 h and the minimum inhibitory concentration. At the epidemiological cut-off minimum inhibitory concentration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa of 0.5 mg/L, percentage of target attainment was only 21%, 18%, and 38% for study 1, 2, and 3, respectively.

Conclusions

We developed a population PK model of ciprofloxacin in ICU patients using pooled data of individual patients from three studies. A simple ciprofloxacin dose recommendation for the entire ICU population remains challenging owing to the PK differences within ICU patients, hence dose individualization may be needed for the optimization of ciprofloxacin treatment.