Bayesian analysis of real-world data as evidence for drug approval: Remembering Sir Michael Rawlins

Drug development in psychiatry: 50 years of failure and how to resuscitate it

The past 50 years have seen remarkable advances in the science of medicine. The pharmacological treatments of disorders such as hypertension, immune disorders, and cancer are fundamentally different from those used in the 1970s, and are now more often based on disorder-specific pathologies. The same cannot be said for psychiatric medicines: despite remarkable advances in neuroscience, very few innovative treatments have been developed in this field since the 1970s. For depression, schizophrenia, anxiety disorders, and ADHD, pharmacological classes of medicines discovered through serendipity in the 1950s are still used despite hundreds of billions of US dollars being spent on drug discovery attempts based on new neuroscience targets. This Personal View presents my opinion on the reasons innovation in psychiatric treatment has not progressed as well as in other disorders. As a researcher in the field, I offer suggestions as to how this situation must be rectified soon, as by most analyses mental illness is becoming a major health burden globally. Most of my evidence is referenced, but where I have unpublished knowledge gained from consulting with pharmaceutical companies, it is presented as an opinion.

The Australia story: Current status and future challenges for the clinical applications of psychedelics

The past decade has seen a huge increase in clinical research with psychedelic drugs and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), which have revealed great potential for treating mental health conditions. Given this progress in research, as well as the current unmet clinical need of millions of patients, in 2023, the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) approved the use of psilocybin for treatment-resistant depression and MDMA for PTSD to take effect from 1 July 2023. The campaign for TGA approval was led by a coalition comprising the Australian charity Mind Medicine Australia with support from Professor David Nutt, Drug Science, Professor Arthur Christopolous, Professor Chris Langmead (both from Monash University) and from large numbers of clinical, academic and patient groups. Under the rescheduling, current prescribing rights are limited to psychiatrists who have become authorised prescribers under the TGA's Authorised Prescriber Scheme, and psilocybin can only be used for treatment resistant depression and MDMA can only be used for PTSD. This paper reviews the background for this decision, its implications for approvals in other jurisdictions, as well as for the development pathways for other psychedelic drugs.

Is it now time to prepare psychiatry for a psychedelic future?

Australia has just rescheduled two drugs controlled under the United Nations Psychotropic Drug Conventions, psilocybin and MDMA, as treatments for treatment-resistant depression and post-traumatic stress disorder respectively. This feature explores the reasons for these developments, the opportunities and challenges they provide to psychiatry communities and how along with health systems these communities might respond to these developments.

Medicinal cannabis for treating post-traumatic stress disorder and comorbid depression: real-world evidence

BACKGROUND

Cannabis-based medicinal products (CBMPs) are increasingly being used to treat post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), despite limited evidence of their efficacy. PTSD is often comorbid with major depression, and little is known about whether comorbid depression alters the effectiveness of CBMPs.

AIMS

To document the prevalence of depression among individuals seeking CBMPs to treat PTSD and to examine whether the effectiveness of CBMPs varies by depression status.

METHOD

Data were available for 238 people with PTSD seeking CBMP treatment (5.9% of the treatment-seeking sample) and 3-month follow-up data were available for 116 of these. Self-reported PTSD symptoms were assessed at treatment entry and at 3-month follow-up using the PTSD Checklist - Civilian Version (PCL-C). The probable presence of comorbid depression at treatment entry was assessed using the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Additional data included sociodemographic characteristics and self-reported quality of life.

RESULTS

In total, 77% met screening criteria for depression, which was associated with higher levels of PTSD symptomatology (mean 67.8 v. 48.4, F(1,236) = 118.5, P < 0.001) and poorer general health, quality of life and sleep. PTSD symptomatology reduced substantially 3 months after commencing treatment (mean 58.0 v. 47.0, F(1,112) = 14.5, P < 0.001), with a significant interaction (F(1,112) = 6.2, P < 0.05) indicating greater improvement in those with depression (mean difference 15.3) than in those without (mean difference 7).

CONCLUSIONS

Depression is common among individuals seeking CBMPs to treat PTSD and is associated with greater symptom severity and poorer quality of life. Effectiveness of CBMPs for treating PTSD does not appear to be impaired in people with comorbid depression.