Antitumour necrosis factor-α therapy for hidradenitis suppurativa: results from a national cohort study between 2000 and 2013

Clinical-Epidemiological Characteristics of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Retrospective Cohort Study from a Tertiary Care Centre in Northern Israel

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is characterised by inflamed lesions that typically appear in apocrine-rich flexural areas. Although studies have reported clinical and epidemiological data from western countries, data from the Middle East are scarce. The aim of this study is to characterise the differences in the clinical characteristics of patients with HS of Arab and Jewish ancestry and review the clinical characteristics, the course of the disease, the comorbidities, and the response to treatment.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study. We collected clinical and demographic data from patient files between 2015-2018 at the Rambam Healthcare Campus dermatology clinic-a tertiary hospital located in the north of Israel. Our results were compared to those of a previously published Israeli control group registered in Clalit Health Services.

RESULTS

Of the 164 patients with HS, 96 (58.5%) were men and 68 (41.5%) were women. The average age at diagnosis was 27.5 years and the average latency between the onset and diagnosis of the disease was 4 years. We found a higher adjusted prevalence of HS in Arab patients (56%) than in their Jewish counterparts (44%). Gender, smoking, and obesity, as well as axilla and buttock lesions, were risk factors for severe HS, with no differences between ethnicities. No differences were documented in comorbidities and in response to adalimumab, with a high overall response rate of 83%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings revealed differences between Arab and Jewish patients with HS in terms of incidence and gender predominance, while no differences were documented in comorbidities and response to adalimumab.

Ex Vivo Culture Models of Hidradenitis Suppurativa for Defining Molecular Pathogenesis and Treatment Efficacy of Novel Drugs

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a complex and debilitating inflammatory skin disease for which no effective treatment is available currently. This is partly because of the lack of adequate human or animal models for defining the pathobiology of the disease. Here, we describe the development of air-liquid (A-L) interface, liquid-submersion (L-S), and bioreactor (Bio) ex vivo skin culture models. All three ex vivo platforms were effective for culturing skin samples for up to 14 days. Tissue architecture and integrity remained intact for at least 3 days for healthy skin and 14 days for HS skin. Up to day 3, no significant differences were observed in % early apoptotic cells among all three platforms. However, late apoptotic/necrotic cell death was increased in HS skin at day 3 in A-L and Bio culture. These cultures efficiently support the growth of various cells populations, including keratinocytes and immune cells. Profiling inflammatory gene signatures in HS skin from these ex vivo cultures showed dynamic changes in expression at day 3 and day 14. All three culture platforms were necessary to represent the inflammatory gene status of HS skin at day 0, suggesting that not all gene clusters were identically altered in each culture method. Similarly, cytokine/chemokine profiling of the supernatants from vehicle- and drug-treated ex vivo HS cultures again showed a better prediction of drug efficacy against HS. Overall, development of these three culture systems collectively provides a powerful tool to uncover the pathobiology of HS progression and screen various drugs against HS.

Metabolic, pharmacokinetic, and toxicological issues of biologic therapies currently used in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa

INTRODUCTION

Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic, relapsing, debilitating inflammatory dermatologic disease of the terminal hair follicles at intertriginous sites clinically characterized by painful inflammatory nodules, abscesses, draining sinus tracts, and dermal fibrosis. The management of hidradenitis suppurativa is a challenge and usually consists of both medical and surgical approaches, which must often be combined for best outcome. The introduction of biological therapies, specifically TNFα-inhibitors such as adalimumab, has profoundly changed the therapeutic armamentarium of the disease.

AREAS COVERED

The PubMed database was searched using combinations of the following keywords: hidradentis suppurativa, biologic therapy, TNF-α inhibitors, adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, certolizumab pegol, golimumab, adverse effects, pharmacodynamics, pharmacology, adverse events, pharmacokinetics, drug interaction. This article reviews and updates the chemistry, pharmacokinetics, mechanism of action, adverse effects, drug interactions of on-label and off-label use of TNF-α inhibitors in HS.

EXPERT OPINION

Biologic agents, particularly adalimumab, exhibit clinical efficacy in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa. Careful patient selection and close monitoring during treatment are mandatory to provide safe and effective use of the TNF-α inhibitor. Familiarity with biologic agents is crucial because these agents could become a consolidated treatment option in the clinician's therapeutic approaches.

Immunopathogenesis of hidradenitis suppurativa and response to anti-TNF-α therapy

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a highly prevalent, morbid inflammatory skin disease with limited treatment options. The major cell types and inflammatory pathways in skin of patients with HS are poorly understood, and which patients will respond to TNF-α blockade is currently unknown. We discovered that clinically and histologically healthy appearing skin (i.e., nonlesional skin) is dysfunctional in patients with HS with a relative loss of immune regulatory pathways. HS skin lesions were characterized by quantitative and qualitative dysfunction of type 2 conventional dendritic cells, relatively reduced regulatory T cells, an influx of memory B cells, and a plasma cell/plasmablast infiltrate predominantly in end-stage fibrotic skin. At the molecular level, there was a relative bias toward the IL-1 pathway and type 1 T cell responses when compared with both healthy skin and psoriatic patient skin. Anti–TNF-α therapy markedly attenuated B cell activation with minimal effect on other inflammatory pathways. Finally, we identified an immune activation signature in skin before anti–TNF-α treatment that correlated with subsequent lack of response to this modality. Our results reveal the fundamental immunopathogenesis of HS and provide a molecular foundation for future studies focused on stratifying patients based on likelihood of clinical response to TNF-α blockade.

Hidradenitis suppurativa lesions are characterized by alterations in cDC2s, relatively reduced Tregs, an influx of memory B cells and plasma cells, and biases towards IL1 pathway activation and type 1 T cell responses.

Recognition, diagnosis, and treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic skin condition characterized by recurrent painful abscesses usually limited to the intertriginous areas. Global prevalence has been estimated at up to 4% of the population. The exact pathogenesis of hidradenitis suppurativa is yet to be elucidated; however, recent research has shown that the disease occurs under the influence of multiple genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors. Repeated insults result in sinus tract formation and disfigurement, which can have a significant psychosocial effect on patients. A wide range of treatments are available but none are curative. A combination antibiotic regimen is considered first line, and research into the use of biologics has been promising. Early recognition and treatment is paramount to achieving a better prognosis and improving patient quality of life.

Long-term safety of adalimumab for patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa

Introduction: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic debilitating inflammatory skin disorder that affects regions rich in apocrine glands. Although the etiology of HS is not clear, inflammatory cytokines, like tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, participate in pathogenesis. Adalimumab (ADA), a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody that selectively targets TNFα, is the only EMA/FDA-approved biologic agent available for the therapy of moderate-to-severe HS.Areas covered: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to present existing studies with an emphasis on the safety profile of ADA for the treatment of moderate-to-severe HS. ADA is prescribed for more than 15 years for varied indications and has improved the therapeutic outcomes of many diseases. Clinical trials and real-life safety data from ADA administration in HS were presented, with particular attention to special populations, such as children, elderly, and pregnant women.Expert opinion: Existing data advise for limited safety concerns with long-term ADA treatment provided that patients are thoroughly screened for infections, latent tuberculosis, and history of malignancy before the start of treatment.

TNF-α inhibitors in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a complex disease with a dramatic impact on the quality of life of patients that it afflicts. Despite this, there are few treatment options offering long-term relief. The exact pathophysiology of HS is unclear, although the current theory involves follicular obstruction, rupture, and subsequent inflammation leading to fistula and abscess development in intertriginous skin. Several inflammatory modulators have been implicated in the development of HS, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α as well as interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-10, and IL-17. Initial evidence for the use of TNF-α inhibitors in HS stemmed from recognition that inflammatory bowel disease patients treated with these medications saw a concurrent improvement in their HS symptoms. Early case reports and case series illustrated TNF-α inhibitors’ value in the treatment of HS. Later, two phase III clinical trials, PIONEER I and PIONEER II, demonstrated that adalimumab is an efficacious treatment for HS. Infliximab represents another effective HS treatment option with its main advantage being dosing flexibility. In contrast, clinical trials have failed to show evidence for application of etanercept in HS. There is limited data on other TNF-α inhibitors such as certolizumab-pegol and golimumab. This review outlines the history, dosing, response, and adverse effects of TNF-α inhibitors in the treatment of HS.

Systematic review of immunomodulatory therapies for hidradenitis suppurativa

Background: Greater understanding of the roles of tumor necrosis factor-α, IL-1β, IL-10, and the IL-23/T-helper (Th) 17 and IL-12/Th1 pathways in immune dysregulation in moderate/severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) has helped in developing new regimens. We aim to review the use of different immunomodulatory therapies used to manage HS.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted on the PubMed and Clinicaltrials.gov databases from 1 January 1947 to 31 December 2018. Only clinical trials, case reports, case series and retrospective analyses published in the English language were included.

Results: Our search yielded 107 articles and 35 clinical trials, of which 15 are still ongoing. The tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors adalimumab and infliximab were the most comprehensively studied agents. Published data from clinical trials support the efficacy of adalimumab, infliximab, anakinra, ustekinumab, bermekimab and apremilast but not etanercept and MEDI8968. Clinical trials for CJM112 have been completed, with results awaiting publication. Trials are underway for secukinumab, IFX-1, INCB054707 and bimekizumab. Biologics used in smaller cohorts include canakinumab, golimumab and rituximab. Most agents are well tolerated and demonstrate a good safety profile, with the most commonly reported adverse event being infections.

Discussion and conclusions: To date, adalimumab is the only biologic which has been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for HS. However, other agents also show promise, with further trials underway to evaluate their efficacy, tolerability and safety profiles. Different clinical measurement scores and endpoints used to make direct comparison difficult. Longitudinal surveillance and pooled registry data are paramount to evaluate the long-term safety profile and efficacy of therapy.

Efficacy of adalimumab in moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa: Real life data

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a relapsing, inflammatory disease characterized by painful nodules, abscesses, sinuses track formation and scarring. HS has a great impact on patients’ quality of life and its treatment may be really challenging. Adalimumab provides a new therapeutic option for HS. Our aim was to assess the therapeutic potential of adalimumab on patients with HS based on the data from the daily clinical practice of an HS Outpatient Clinic. 19 patients with clinically evident moderate to severe HS, under adalimumab treatment for at least 24 week, participated in this observational, retrospective study. The Hidradenitis Suppurativa Physician’s Global Assessment scale, Modified Santorius scale and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at baseline, week 4, week 12 and week 24 were retrieved from the records. Both Modified Santorius score and DLQI were significantly decreased during the weeks of evaluation (Friedman’s test; P < 0.001). The proportion of patients who achieved clinical response was 10.5% (n = 2) at week 4, 42.1% (n = 8) at week 12 and 63.2% (n = 12) at week 24. Treatment with adalimumab was linked with both clinical remission of HS and improvement of patients’ quality of life.

Non-surgical treatments for hidradenitis suppurativa: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The management of hidradenitis suppurativa is multidisciplinary, involving general measures, medical treatment and surgery. Non-surgical treatments, often first-line procedures, mainly concern forms of low-to-moderate severity or, conversely, very severe forms in non-operable patients or those refusing surgery. While many treatments have been attempted, few randomized controlled trials have been conducted, so the choice of treatments is most often based on the personal experience of the clinicians. The objective of this systematic review is to propose a synthetic analysis of the currently available non-surgical procedures.

METHODS

This systematic review of the literature was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA criteria. We searched for articles in the Medline^®, PubMed Central, Embase and Cochrane databases published between January 2005 and September 2015.

RESULTS

Sixty-four articles were included. They generally had a low level of evidence; indeed, the majority of them were retrospective observational studies. They involved biotherapy (44%), dynamic phototherapy (16%), antibiotics (11%), Laser (8%), retinoids (6%) and immunosuppressive therapies, anti-inflammatory drugs, zinc, metformin, gammaglobulins and fumarates.

CONCLUSIONS

None of the non-surgical treatments can treat all stages of the disease and offer long-term remission. Antibiotics and biotherapy seem to have real effectiveness but their effect remains suspensive and the disease is almost certain to reappear once they are stopped. As regards antibiotics, no association has shown their superiority in a study with a high level of evidence. And while some biotherapies seem quite effective, due to their side effects they should be reserved for moderate-to-severe, resistant or inoperable forms of the disease. Randomized controlled studies are needed before valid conclusions can be drawn. In the resistant or disabling forms, it is consequently advisable to orientate to the greatest possible extent towards radical surgery, which is the only treatment allowing hope for cure.

Spotlight on adalimumab in the treatment of active moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, recurrent, inflammatory skin disease that affects the hair follicles of the aprocrine gland-bearing anatomical areas of the body. It is characterized by deep painful nodules and abscesses that rupture and contribute to the formation of sinus tracks and scarring. The management of HS is based on the assessment of disease severity and a combination of medical and surgical treatment according to the European Guidelines. Adalimumab, a recombinant, fully humanized, anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF-α) monoclonal antibody, is the only officially approved treatment for the management of moderate-to-severe HS. Case reports, concerning 42 patients who received adalimumab for severe HS (with the standard dose regimen for psoriasis), reported a cumulative response rate of 58% (≥50% in 23 patients) with a relapse rate of 71% (10 out of 14 patients). The most recent and most well-powered phase III, randomized placebo-controlled trials for the evaluation of the efficacy and safety of adalimumab in treatment of moderate-to-severe HS (PIONEER studies I and II) showed that the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) rate at week 12 was significantly higher for patients randomized to adalimumab compared to placebo. Adverse events were comparable to placebo. In conclusion, adalimumab, to date, holds the most robust data regarding treatment efficacy in HS. Larger, registry-based studies are needed to further establish the efficacy and safety profile of this anti-TNF-α agent in HS.