Marked intrafamilial phenotypic heterogeneity in dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa caused by inheritance of a mild dominant glycine substitution and a novel deep intronic recessive COL7A1 mutation

Systematic review on antipruritic therapies for patients with Epidermolysis bullosa

INTRODUCTION

Itch is one of the most burdensome symptoms in epidermolysis bullosa (EB), indicating a hitherto unmet therapeutic need. This review leverages existing data on efficacy of itch treatment in EB to support sound decision making.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed on 29 March 2022. Studies written later than 1991 and reporting outcomes in patients with EB treated for itch were considered.

RESULTS

Of the 3,099 articles screened, 21 studies met eligibility criteria, comprising 353 patients (65.9%) diagnosed for recessive dystrophic EB. Only two studies (9.5%) evaluated itch as primary endpoint, of which solely one revealed a significant relief of self-reported itch upon topical skin care. In those studies assessing itch as secondary endpoint (19/21, 90.5%), only 36.8% studies (n = 7/19) revealed a statistically significant itch reduction of up to 42%. Methodological limitations (heterogeneity of outcomes, inconsistent data assessment) in addition to limited superiority over control were implicated to account for low treatment efficacy observed in most studies.

CONCLUSION

Current data quality impairs comparative efficacy analyses of itch treatments in EB. Large scale randomized clinical trials and more personalized approaches applying validated measurement instruments for core outcomes are needed to substantiate evidence-based treatment approaches for EB-associated itch.

Splice modulation strategy applied to deep intronic variants in COL7A1 causing recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa

Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) is a rare and most often severe genetic disease characterized by recurrent blistering and erosions of the skin and mucous membranes after minor trauma, leading to major local and systemic complications. The disease is caused by loss-of-function variants in COL7A1 encoding type VII collagen (C7), the main component of anchoring fibrils, which form attachment structures stabilizing the cutaneous basement membrane zone. Alterations in C7 protein structure and/or expression lead to abnormal, rare or absent anchoring fibrils resulting in loss of dermal-epidermal adherence and skin blistering. To date, more than 1,200 distinct COL7A1 deleterious variants have been reported and 19% are splice variants. Here, we describe two RDEB patients for whom we identified two pathogenic deep intronic pathogenic variants in COL7A1. One of these variants (c.7795-97C > G) promotes the inclusion of a pseudoexon between exons 104 and 105 in the COL7A1 transcript, while the other causes partial or complete retention of intron 51. We used antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) mediated exon skipping to correct these aberrant splicing events in vitro. This led to increased normal mRNA splicing above 94% and restoration of C7 protein expression at a level (up to 56%) that should be sufficient to reverse the phenotype. This first report of exon skipping applied to counteract deep intronic variants in COL7A1 represents a promising therapeutic strategy for personalized medicine directed at patients with intronic variants at a distance of consensus splice sites.

Epidermolysis Bullosa—A Different Genetic Approach in Correlation with Genetic Heterogeneity

Epidermolysis bullosa is a heterogeneous group of rare genetic disorders characterized by mucocutaneous fragility and blister formation after minor friction or trauma. There are four major epidermolysis bullosa types based on the ultrastructural level of tissue cleavage: simplex, junctional, dystrophic, and Kindler epidermolysis bullosa. They are caused by mutations in genes that encode the proteins that are part of the hemidesmosomes and focal adhesion complex. Some of these disorders can be associated with extracutaneous manifestations, which are sometimes fatal. They are inherited in an autosomal recessive or autosomal dominant manner. This review is focused on the phenomena of heterogeneity (locus, allelic, mutational, and clinical) in epidermolysis bullosa, and on the correlation genotype–phenotype.

Novel pathogenic variants in an Indian cohort with epidermolysis bullosa: Expanding the genotypic spectrum

BACKGROUND

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a genodermatosis characterized by skin fragility and blisters with variable severity. Patients with Dystrophic EB (DEB) or Junctional EB (JEB) mainly present to clinic due to greater functional impairment. Pathogenic sequence variations in COL7A1 are implicated in DEB.

OBJECTIVE

We have tried to decipher the molecular spectrum and genotype phenotype correlation of 21 Indian patients with EB.

METHODS

Next generation sequencing (NGS) was performed to determine the pathogenic variants. Sanger sequencing was also done for validation of the variants in eleven individuals.

RESULTS

Pathogenic variants were detected in 20 individuals (diagnostic yield of 95%). Majority of them (90%) had sequence variation in COL7A1 while two had pathogenic variants in ITGB4 and KRT14 respectively. Out of the 18 patients confirmed to have DEB, 3 had Dominant DEB (DDEB) whereas 15 patients had Recessive DEB (RDEB). Amongst 23 sequence variations identified, 12 were found to be novel (3 were missense, 5 were premature termination codon variants while 4 were splice-site changes).

CONCLUSION

Genotype phenotype correlation was noted with milder manifestations in those with dominant inheritance types. Exact molecular diagnosis can be ascertained by NGS in majority of cases.

Dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa pruriginosa: a new case series of a rare phenotype unveils skewed Th2 immunity

BACKGROUND

Dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa pruriginosa (DEB-Pr) is a rare subtype of hereditary epidermolysis bullosa, with a poorly understood pathogenesis and no satisfactory treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the clinical and biological features, genetic basis and therapeutic management, to better characterize this rare genodermatosis.

METHODS

We have conducted a retrospective study, reviewing the clinical presentation, genetic diagnosis, immunohistopathological findings and biological characteristics and management of patients with dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa pruriginosa. This study was conducted in the Department of Dermatology at Saint-Louis Hospital and the Department of Genetics at Necker Hospital (Paris, France). All patients with a diagnosis of DEB-Pr seen between 2010 and 2020 were included.

RESULTS

Seven patients were included, the average age of 50.1 years [range 36-76]. Pruriginous-lichenified papules, plaques or nodules appeared at 27.6 years on average [range 7-66] on pretibial areas and forearms, associated with milia and toenails dystrophy. All patients received multiple treatments, but none could sustainably reduce pruritus. Immunohistopathological analysis of lesion skin revealed subepidermal blister with fibrosis, milia and mast cell infiltration. Serum TNFα, IL1β and IL6 levels were elevated in 2/6 patients. Total serum IgE levels were increased in 7/7 patients, with no history of atopy. Immunophenotyping of circulating T-cells revealed an increased Th2 subset in 4/4 patients, with reduced Th1 and Th17 subpopulations. Genetic analysis of COL7A1 identified 7 distinct causative mutations, six of which were new. Intra-familial clinical variability was documented in 5/7 patients and was associated with the co-inheritance of a recessive COL7A1 mutation or an FLG2 mutation in 2 families.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirms the stereotyped presentation of DEB-Pr with large intra-familial variability in disease expression. Mast cell infiltration, elevated IgE and increased Th2 subset without atopy strongly support a role of Th2-mediated immunity in DEB-Pr, and further argue for new targeted therapeutic options such as dupilumab.

Clinical Perspectives of Gene-Targeted Therapies for Epidermolysis Bullosa

New insights into molecular genetics and pathomechanisms in epidermolysis bullosa (EB), methodological and technological advances in molecular biology as well as designated funding initiatives and facilitated approval procedures for orphan drugs have boosted translational research perspectives for this devastating disease. This is echoed by the increasing number of clinical trials assessing innovative molecular therapies in the field of EB. Despite remarkable progress, gene-corrective modalities, aimed at sustained or permanent restoration of functional protein expression, still await broad clinical availability. This also reflects the methodological and technological shortcomings of current strategies, including the translatability of certain methodologies beyond preclinical models as well as the safe, specific, efficient, feasible, sustained and cost-effective delivery of therapeutic/corrective information to target cells. This review gives an updated overview on status, prospects, challenges and limitations of current gene-targeted therapies.

Consensus reclassification of inherited epidermolysis bullosa and other disorders with skin fragility

BACKGROUND

Several new genes and clinical subtypes have been identified since the publication in 2014 of the report of the last International Consensus Meeting on Epidermolysis Bullosa (EB).

OBJECTIVES

We sought to reclassify disorders with skin fragility, with a focus on EB, based on new clinical and molecular data.

METHODS

This was a consensus expert review.

RESULTS

In this latest consensus report, we introduce the concept of genetic disorders with skin fragility, of which classical EB represents the prototype. Other disorders with skin fragility, where blisters are a minor part of the clinical picture or are not seen because skin cleavage is very superficial, are classified as separate categories. These include peeling skin disorders, erosive disorders, hyperkeratotic disorders, and connective tissue disorders with skin fragility. Because of the common manifestation of skin fragility, these 'EB-related' disorders should be considered under the EB umbrella in terms of medical and socioeconomic provision of care.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed classification scheme should be of value both to clinicians and researchers, emphasizing both clinical and genetic features of EB. What is already known about this topic? Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a group of genetic disorders with skin blistering. The last updated recommendations on diagnosis and classification were published in 2014. What does this study add? We introduce the concept of genetic disorders with skin fragility, of which classical EB represents the prototype. Clinical and genetic aspects, genotype-phenotype correlations, disease-modifying factors and natural history of EB are reviewed. Other disorders with skin fragility, e.g. peeling skin disorders, erosive disorders, hyperkeratotic disorders, and connective tissue disorders with skin fragility are classified as separate categories; these 'EB-related' disorders should be considered under the EB umbrella in terms of medical and socioeconomic provision of care. Linked Comment: Pope. Br J Dermatol 2020; 183:603.

Epidermolysis bullosa hereditaria

Epidermolysis bullosa hereditaria (EB) umfasst eine Gruppe von Erkrankungen, die mit Hautfragilität und mechanisch verursachter Blasenbildung einhergehen. Die klinischen Manifestationen zeigen unterschiedliche Schweregrade, von lebensbedrohlich bis leicht. Im Kindesalter und bei Erwachsenen kann das klinische Bild typisch sein; allerdings kann bei Neugeborenen der EB-Subtyp klinisch häufig nicht bestimmt werden. Pathogene Varianten in 20 Genen sind bereits als krankheitsursächlich für die verschiedenen Formen der EB beschrieben. Die allelische Heterogenität ist sehr groß. Die Diagnostik basiert auf der genauen klinischen Untersuchung, der Familienanamnese und der molekulargenetischen Analyse. Aufgrund der genetischen Heterogenität und der Größe der Gene eignet sich die „Next-generation-sequencing“-basierte Multi-Gen-Panel-Diagnostik am besten. Teilweise sind Genotyp-Phänotyp-Korrelationen bekannt, sodass die genetische Diagnostik auch prognostisch eine Rolle spielt.

Clinical practice guidelines for laboratory diagnosis of epidermolysis bullosa

Linked Comment: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.18377.

https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.18829 available online

Biallelic KRT5 mutations in autosomal recessive epidermolysis bullosa simplex, including a complete human keratin 5 "knock-out"

Epidermolysis bullosa simplex (EBS) is usually inherited as an autosomal dominant disease due to monoallelic gain-of-function mutations in KRT5 or KRT14. Although autosomal recessive forms of EBS have been associated with mutations in at least 10 genes, recessive EBS due to homozygous biallelic KRT5 mutations has not been reported previously; it has been hypothesized that it would result in prenatal lethality. We sought the genetic causes of EB in a cohort of 512 distinct EB families by performing whole exome sequencing (WES) and using an EB-targeting next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel of 21 genes. The pathogenicity and consequences of the mutations were determined by expression profiling and at tissue and ultrastructural levels. Two pathogenic, homozygous missense variants of KRT5 in two patients with generalized EBS and a homozygous null mutation in a patient who died as a neonate from complications of EB were found. The two missense mutations disrupted keratin 5 expression on immunofluorescence microscopy, and the human "knock-out" of KRT5 showed no RNA and protein expression. Collectively, these findings identify biallelic KRT5 mutations with a phenotypic spectrum varying from mild, localized and generalized to perinatal lethal, expanding the genotypic profile of autosomal recessive EBS.

Compound Heterozygosity of Dominant and Recessive COL7A Alleles in a Severely Affected Patient with a Family History of Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa: Clinical Findings, Genetic Testing, and Treatment Implications

An 8-year-old girl born to a family with more than three generations of dominant dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DDEB) presented with life-threatening confluent skin erosions, mitten hand deformity, and failure to thrive. Reassessment of her family history and genetic testing showed compound heterozygous COL7A mutations, one inherited from her DDEB-affected mother and one from her unaffected, healthy father. This family illustrates the risk of unexpected, severe, autosomal recessive epidermolysis bullosa (EB) in a family with milder, multigenerational autosomal dominant EB. Clinicians should recognize the clinical spectrum of dystrophic EB and recommend genetic consultation when the phenotype conflicts with family history.