Skin cancer multiplicity in lung transplant recipients: a prospective population-based study

Photodynamic therapy with BF-200 ALA gel for the treatment of actinic keratosis, Bowen´s disease and basal cell carcinoma in long term immunosuppressed patients after organ transplantation

Continuous immunosuppression after organ transplantation is associated with an increased risk of developing keratinocyte neoplastic lesions. Topical photodynamic therapy represents a therapeutic approach for different keratinocyte neoplastic lesions. However, the specific efficacy and safety of this treatment in this immunocompromised population remains largely unknown. In this case report series, we show the efficacy and safety of photodynamic therapy with BF-200 ALA gel using red-light and daylight in immunocompromised patients. Out of 8 patients presented here, 1 was treated for 8 basal cell carcinomas, 1 for 2 Bowen´s disease lesions and 6 were treated for field cancerization including 4 to 10 actinic keratoses. Treatment response rates were above 75 %. The adverse events, including pain, did not differ from those already described for PDT. These data suggest that PDT with BF-200 ALA gel could be an effective and safe option to add to the treatment portfolio for neoplastic keratinocyte lesions in this high-risk population.

Contribution of skin cancer to overall healthcare costs of lung transplantation in Queensland, Australia

BACKGROUND

Skin cancers are a major source of morbidity in lung transplant recipients, but the relative costs associated with their treatment are unknown.

METHODS

We prospectively followed 90 lung transplant recipients from enrollment in the Skin Tumors in Allograft Recipients study in 2013-2015, until mid-2016. We undertook a cost analysis to quantify the health system costs relating to the index transplant episode and ongoing costs for 4 years. Linked data from surveys, Australian Medicare claims, and hospital accounting systems were used, and generalized linear models were employed.

RESULTS

Median initial hospitalization costs of lung transplantation were AU$115,831 (interquartile range (IQR) $87,428-$177,395). In total, 57 of 90 (63%) participants were treated for skin cancers during follow-up at a total cost of AU$44,038. Among these 57, total government costs per person (mostly of pharmaceuticals) over 4 years were median AU$68,489 (IQR $44,682-$113,055) vs AU$59,088 (IQR $38,190-$94,906) among those without skin cancer, with the difference predominantly driven by more doctors' visits, and higher pathology and procedural costs. Healthcare costs overall were also significantly higher in those treated for skin cancers (cost ratio 1.50, 95%CI: 1.09, 2.06) after adjusting for underlying lung disease, age on enrollment, years of immunosuppression, and the number of treated comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

Skin cancer care is a small component of overall costs. While all lung transplant recipients with comorbidities have substantial healthcare costs, those affected by skin cancer incur even greater healthcare costs than those without, highlighting the importance of skin cancer control.

Multimodal Transplant-clinic-based Skin Cancer Prevention Education for Organ Transplant Recipients: Feasibility Study

We studied the feasibility of transplant-clinic staff routinely providing primary prevention advice to lung transplant recipients at high risk of skin cancer.

Methods

Patients enrolled by a transplant-clinic study nurse completed baseline questionnaires and received sun-safety brochures. For the 12-mo intervention, transplant physicians were alerted to provide standard sun-protection advice (use of hat, long sleeves, and sunscreen outdoors) by sun-advice prompt cards attached to participants' medical charts at each clinic visit. Patients indicated receiving advice from their physician and from study personnel via an exit-card postclinic, and at final study clinics, they also reported their sun behaviors by questionnaire. Feasibility of the intervention was measured by patients' and clinic staff's study engagement; effectiveness was assessed by calculating odds ratios (ORs) for improved sun protection, using generalized estimating equations.

Results

Of 151 patients invited, 134 consented (89%), and 106 (79 %) (63% male, median age 56 y, 93% of European descent) completed the study. Odds of receiving sun advice from transplant physicians and study nurses rose after the intervention compared with baseline (ORs, 1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96-2.96 and 3.56; 95% CI, 1.38-9.14, respectively). After 12 mo of regular transplant-clinic advice, odds of sunburn decreased (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.13-2.60), and odds of applying sunscreen (OR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.20-3.09) almost doubled.

Conclusions

Encouragement of primary prevention of skin cancer among organ transplant recipients by physicians and nurses during routine transplant-clinic visits is feasible and appears to be effective.

Basal cell carcinomas in organ transplant recipients versus the general population: clinicopathologic study

Organ transplant recipients (OTRs) are at greater risk of basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) than non-OTRs, but histopathologic differences between BCCs in OTRs and the general population are largely unknown. We compared clinicopathologic features of BCCs in OTRs vs the general population in Queensland, Australia. Details of BCC tumors (site, size, level of invasion, subtype, biopsy procedure) were collected from histopathology reports in two prospective skin cancer studies, one in OTRs and one general-population-based. We used log-binomial regression models to estimate age- and sex-adjusted prevalence ratios (PR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for BCC features. Overall, there were 702 BCCs in 200 OTRs and 1725 BCCs in 804 population cases. Of these, 327 tumors in 128 OTRs were higher risk BCCs (any head and neck BCC; ≥ 2 cm on trunk/extremities), more per person than 703 higher risk BCCs in 457 cases in the general population (chi-square p = 0.008). Among head/neck BCCs, OTRs were more likely than general population cases to have BCCs on scalp/ear than on face/lip/neck (PR = 1.5, 95%CI 1.2-1.8). Although aggressive subtypes were less common among higher risk BCCs in OTRs, BCCs invading beyond the dermis were almost twice as prevalent in OTRs (PR = 1.8, 95% CI 1.3-2.6) than the general population.

Polygenic Risk Scores Stratify Keratinocyte Cancer Risk among Solid Organ Transplant Recipients with Chronic Immunosuppression in a High Ultraviolet Radiation Environment

Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) have elevated risks for basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), especially in high UVR environments. We assessed whether polygenic risk scores can improve the prediction of BCC and SCC risks and multiplicity over and above the traditional risk factors in SOTRs in a high UV setting. We built polygenic risk scores for BCC (n = 594,881) and SCC (n = 581,431) using UK Biobank and 23andMe datasets, validated them in the Australian QSkin Sun and Health Study cohort (n > 6,300), and applied them in SOTRs in the skin tumor in allograft recipients cohort from Queensland, Australia, a high UV environment. About half of the SOTRs with a high genetic risk developed BCC (absolute risk = 45.45%, 95% confidence interval = 33.14-58.19%) and SCC (absolute risk = 44.12%, 95% confidence interval = 32.08-56.68%). For both cancers, SOTRs in the top quintile were at >3-fold increased risk relative to those in the bottom quintile. The respective polygenic risk scores improved risk predictions by 2% for BCC (area under the curve = 0.77 vs. 0.75, P = 0.0691) and SCC (area under the curve = 0.84 vs. 0.82, P = 0.0260), over and above the established risk factors, and 19.03% (for BCC) and 18.10% (for SCC) of the SOTRs were reclassified in a high/medium/low risk scenario. The polygenic risk scores also added predictive accuracy for tumor multiplicity (BCC R2 = 0.21 vs. 0.19, P = 3.2 × 10-3; SCC R2 = 0.30 vs. 0.27, P = 4.6 × 10-4).

Skin cancers in Italian lung transplant recipients: Incidence and risk factors analysis

Only a few studies reported the incidence and risk factors of skin cancers in lung transplant recipients. The aim of this study was to determine the cumulative incidence of skin cancers in a cohort of patients undergoing lung transplantation and to define predictors of their development. About 247 consecutive patients receiving lung transplantation at the Thoracic Surgery Unit of University Hospital of Padova between May 1995 and October 2016 were studied. Cumulative incidence of skin cancers was estimated considering death as a competing event. The effect of potential predictors was evaluated with univariate and multivariable Cox models for competing risks. About 37 (15.0%) patients developed skin tumors. The cumulative incidence of any skin cancer was 14.2% at 5 years, 21.4% at 10 years, and 24.3% at 15 years posttransplantation. Age at transplantation, male gender, phototype II, and voriconazole use were independent risk factors for development of squamous cell carcinoma. Only male gender and phototype II were independent risk factors for development of basal cell carcinoma. Since lung transplant recipients have a greater risk of developing skin cancers, the management of these patients needs a multidisciplinary approach, in which dermatologists and transplant physicians have a primary role.

Destructive and topical treatments of skin lesions in organ transplant recipients and relation to skin cancer

Various treatments of keratotic skin lesions and early skin cancers are performed in organ transplant recipients (OTRs) at high risk of skin malignancies but the frequency of their use is unknown. We prospectively assessed the frequency of use of cryotherapy, diathermy, and topical therapies and also investigated their associations with background incidence of histologically-confirmed squamous-cell carcinoma (SCC) and basal cell carcinoma (BCC) in a cohort of OTRs in Queensland, Australia. Median follow-up ranged from 1.7 to 3.2 years across organ transplant groups. Among 285 kidney, 125 lung and 203 liver transplant recipients [382 (62%) male, 380 (62%) immunosuppressed > 5 years, 394 (64%) previously diagnosed with skin cancer], 306 (50%) reported treatment of skin lesions with major types of non-excision therapies during follow-up: 278 (45%) cryotherapy or diathermy; 121 (20%) topical treatments. Of these 306, 150 (49%) developed SCC at double the incidence of those who did not receive these treatments, as assessed by incidence rate ratio (IRR) adjusted for age, sex, type of organ transplant, skin color and history of skin cancer at baseline, calculated by multivariable Poisson regression (IRR_adj = 2.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4–3.1). BCC incidence was not associated with these therapies. Skin lesions in OTRs that are treated with cryotherapy, diathermy, or topical treatment warrant judicious selection and careful follow-up.

[Diagnosis and treatment of basal cell carcinoma : A question of the risk of recurrence]

Basal cell carcinoma is the most common type of cancer in Central Europe and has a high medical relevance. Due to its high tendency of recurrence, an important parameter in the planning of therapy is the risk of recurrence. After clinical and histological diagnosis, the majority of tumors are treated surgically, although radiation and topical procedures are also possible therapeutic alternatives in certain constellations. Hedgehog inhibitors, a completely new class of substances, have recently been approved for rare metastatic and locally advanced diseases, thus significantly expanding the range of treatments. This article provides an overview of the current guideline-based diagnosis and therapy of basal cell carcinomas in Germany.