C-reactive protein prior to myeloablative allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation identifies patients at risk of early- and long-term mortality

Levels of C-reactive protein and body temperature elevation during neutropenia predict engraftment and non-relapse mortality for unrelated single-unit cord blood transplantation in adults

BACKGROUND

Cord blood transplantation (CBT) presents unique challenges related to inflammation during neutropenia, such as mucosal damage, infections, and the potential development of pre-engraftment syndrome or pre-engraftment immune reaction. These factors can contribute to significant inflammation and infection shortly after CBT. However, the effect of severe inflammation during neutropenia, specifically elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) level and body temperature, on post-transplant outcomes after CBT remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study aimed to investigate the association between maximum CRP level, maximum body temperature during neutropenia, and post-transplantation outcomes in adult patients undergoing single-unit CBT.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively evaluated the impact of maximum CRP level and maximum body temperature during neutropenia on post-transplantation outcomes in adults who underwent single-unit unrelated CBT between 1998 and 2023 at our institution.

RESULTS

A total of 336 adult patients were included in this study. The median maximum CRP level before neutrophil recovery was 7.75 mg/dL (interquartile range [IQR], 4.70 to 12.05 mg/dL) at a median of 14 days (IQR, 8 to 16 days). The median maximum body temperature before neutrophil recovery was 39.5°C (IQR, 39.0 to 40.0°C) at a median of 15 days (IQR, 12 to 17 days). In the multivariate analysis, a maximum CRP level≥20 mg/dL was significantly associated with lower neutrophil recovery (hazard ratio [HR], 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23 to 0.59; P<0.001), lower platelet recovery (HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.48; P<0.001), and a higher incidence of veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (HR, 16.42; 95% CI, 4.11 to 65.54; P<0.001), which resulted in higher non-relapse mortality (NRM) (HR, 5.16; 95% CI, 2.62 to 10.15; P<0.001) and worse overall survival (HR, 2.81; 95% CI, 1.66 to 4.78; P<0.001). Similarly, a maximum body temperature≥40.5°C was significantly associated with lower neutrophil recovery (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.79; P=0.002), lower platelet recovery (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.79; P=0.001), higher incidence of grades III to IV acute GVHD (HR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.24 to 6.88; P=0.013), and extensive chronic GVHD (HR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.22 to 4.97; P=0.011), which resulted in higher NRM (HR, 3.43; 95% CI, 1.53 to 7.67; P=0.002).

CONCLUSION

Maximum CRP level and maximum body temperature during neutropenia were significantly associated with lower hematopoietic recovery and higher NRM following single-unit CBT in adults. Further studies are warranted to explore early intervention strategies aimed at preventing severe inflammation and improving post-transplant outcomes in single-unit CBT.

Investigation of biomarkers to predict outcomes in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Various biomarkers have been developed and evaluated to predict the prognosis and complications of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Most previous studies conducted on different biomarkers evaluated single effects such as those associated with inflammation, immunology, iron metabolism, and nutrition, and only a few studies have comprehensively analyzed markers.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to survey comprehensive multiple markers prior to HCT and extract those that significantly predict the outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective multicenter observational study was performed. (UMIN000013506) Patients undergoing HCT for hematologic diseases were consecutively enrolled. Besides the usual clinical biomarkers, serum samples for extra-clinical biomarkers were collected and cryopreserved before starting the conditioning regimen. A total of 32 candidate biomarkers were selected, 23 from hematology, biochemistry, immunology, nutrition, and iron metabolism, and 9 from composite markers. Based on the area under the curve (AUC) values for survival, promising biomarkers was extracted. Internal validation for these markers was applied based on bootstrap methods. Setting the cut-off values for them, log-rank test was applied and outcomes including overall survival (OS), relapse, and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were evaluated using multivariate analyses. Furthermore, detailed analysis including transplant-related complications and external validation were conducted focusing on C-reactive protein (CRP) to platelet (Plt) ratio.

RESULTS

A total of 152 patients with hematologic malignancies were enrolled from April 2014 to March 2017. CRP, soluble interleukin-2 receptor (IL2R), CRP to albumin (Alb) ratio, CRP to Plt ratio, Plt to IL2R ratio, and IL2R to Alb ratio were identified as promising markers. Internal validation successfully confirmed their reliability of AUC and multivariate analysis demonstrated the statistical significance between the higher and the lower markers. Above all, a higher CRP to Plt ratio was significantly associated with a lower OS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.77; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30-5.91; P = 0.008) and higher non-relapse mortality rates (HR 2.79; 95%CI 1.14-6.80; P = 0.024) at 180 days. Furthermore, univariate analysis showed that a higher CRP to Plt ratio was significantly associated with a higher incidence of sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (P < 0.001) and bloodstream infection (P = 0.027). An external validation test confirmed the significance of the CRP to Plt ratio for these outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The multicenter prospective observational study successfully identified significant biomarkers in patients with hematologic malignancies who received HCT. In particular, CRP to Plt ratio was identified as a novel and useful biomarker for predicting transplant outcomes. Further investigations are needed to validate the novel markers, analysis of the pathophysiology, and application to treatment settings other than HCT.

Monitoring of strength, inflammation and muscle function in allogenic stem-cell transplantation patients - a pilot study for novel biomarker and risk stratification determination

Background

Low aerobic capacity is associated with an increased mortality risk in allogenic stem-cell transplantation (alloSCT) patients, but currently used risk scores in the pre-transplantation workup are still underestimating physical activity as a prognostic factor.

Aim

To examine the physical condition, muscle function, blood inflammation and training adherence of alloSCT patients during inpatient time to identify potential biomarkers associated with development of myopathy and sarcopenia.

Methods

Patients undergoing alloSCT were examined at four time points (T0: before alloSCT; T_ha: hospital admission; T1: engraftment; T2: inpatient discharge). T0 included cardiopulmonary performance, body composition, grip and knee strength, motor skill tests (One-leg stand/Tinetti/Chair-rising), blood sampling (blood cell profiling and inflammation targets (Kynurenin/high sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)/Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha)/Musclin/Galectin-3) and quality of life, state of health, fatigue, muscle weakness and physical activity by questionnaires (IPAQ/BSA/SARC-F/Fatigue). At T1 and T2, blood samples, grip strength and motor skill tests were repeated. Glucocorticoid dose and daily physical activity were documented during inpatient stay.

Results

26 of 35 included patients (4 females; age 55.58 ± 12.32 years; BMI 24.70 ± 3.27 kg/m²; VO_2peak 16.55 ± 4.06 ml/min/kg) could proceed to alloSCT. Grip strength and Tinetti decreased from T0 until T2, no difference in Chair-rising test, One-leg and Tandem stand. All patients engrafted after 24.9 days ± 3.9 days. HsCRP and Kynurenine increased from T0 to T1, decreased at T2. TNF-alpha (T0vsT2/T1vsT2) and Musclin (T0vsT1) decreased. At T2, Galectin-3 was higher compared to T0/T1. Correlation analysis of grip strength and inflammatory markers revealed a positive correlation with TNF-alpha at T2. 50% of patients documented physical activity and questionnaire and reported a 50%-reduction of daily endurance and strength training between T1 to T2.

Conclusion

Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation is associated with immune system vulnerability due to conditioning, increased inflammation and fatigue, and loss of muscle strength and function. In addition to hsCRP, Kynurenine seems to be a reliable biomarker to monitor acute and regenerative inflammation status of alloSCT patients, while Musclin and Galectin-3 may be added to physiological assessment regarding myopathy and sarcopenia. Grip strength and daily activity level should be documented by professionals to identify risk patients early and support them with optimal (exercise) therapy.

Fecal Microbiota Transplant Mitigates Adverse Outcomes Seen in Patients Colonized With Multidrug-Resistant Organisms Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

The gut microbiome can be adversely affected by chemotherapy and antibiotics prior to hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). This affects graft success and increases susceptibility to multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) colonization and infection. We performed an initial retrospective analysis of our use of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) from healthy donors as therapy for MDRO-colonized patients with hematological malignancy. FMT was performed on eight MDRO-colonized patients pre-HCT (FMT-MDRO group), and outcomes compared with 11 MDRO colonized HCT patients from the same period. At 12 months, survival was significantly higher in the FMT-MDRO group (70% versus 36% p = 0.044). Post-HCT, fewer FMT-MDRO patients required intensive care (0% versus 46%, P = 0.045) or experienced fever (0.29 versus 0.11 days, P = 0.027). Intestinal MDRO decolonization occurred in 25% of FMT-MDRO patients versus 11% non-FMT MDRO patients. Despite the significant differences and statistically comparable patient/transplant characteristics, as the sample size was small, a matched-pair analysis between both groups to non-MDRO colonized control cohorts (2:1 matching) was performed. At 12 months, the MDRO group who did not have an FMT had significantly lower survival (36.4% versus 61.9% respectively, p=0.012), and higher non relapse mortality (NRM; 60.2% versus 16.7% respectively, p=0.009) than their paired non-MDRO-colonized cohort. Conversely, there was no difference in survival (70% versus 43.4%, p=0.14) or NRM (12.5% versus 31.2% respectively, p=0.24) between the FMT-MDRO group and their paired non-MDRO cohort. Collectively, these data suggest that negative clinical outcomes, including mortality associated with MDRO colonization, may be ameliorated by pre-HCT FMT, even in the absence of intestinal MDRO decolonization. Further work is needed to explore this observed benefit.

High lactate dehydrogenase at time of admission for allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation associates to poor survival in acute myeloid leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Risk stratification is important for balancing potential risks and benefits of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for hematological malignancies. We retrospectively studied 1119 patients undergoing allogenic-HSCT in a single center for five hematological indications assessing the prognostic role of LDH at admission for survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), relapse incidence (RI), and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). In non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML), higher than median LDH had an adverse effect on survival. The prognostic significance was strongest in AML, with higher LDH levels having lower 1-and 3-year survival 69.2% vs. 50.8%, P < 0.001 and 51.9% vs. 39.2%, P < 0.001, respectively, reduced 1-and 3-year PFS 62.4% vs. 42.1%, P < 0.001 48% vs. 35.2%, P < 0.001, respectively, higher cumulative incidence of 1-and 3-year NRM 11% vs. 17.3%, p = 0.01 and 15.7% vs. 19.6%, P = 0.04, and higher 1-and 3-year relapse incidence (RI) 26.7% vs. 40.7%, p < .0001 36.2% vs. 40.7%, respectively, P < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis LDH maintained significant prognostic capacity in OS, PFS and RI. These findings in AML, validated in an independent cohort, suggest that LDH is a readily available tool that could be integrated into transplant risk assessments to aid decision-making and identify high-risk patients who may benefit from post-transplant pharmacological or cellular strategies.

Pretransplant C-reactive protein as a prognostic marker in allogeneic stem cell transplantation: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Numerous reports have explored the prognostic value of pretransplant serum C-reactive protein (CRP) in patients receiving allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT), but the results remain conflicting. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to comprehensively assess the prognostic value of pretransplant serum CRP in patients receiving ASCT.

METHODS

We systematically searched eligible studies in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from 1999 to September 2018. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and their corresponding 95% CIs were used to synthetically assess the prognostic value of pre-ASCT CRP in terms of overall survival (OS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), and acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD).

RESULTS

A total of 14 articles with 15 studies containing 3458 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that high pre-ASCT CRP level was significantly related to worse OS (HR = 1.63; 95% CI: 1.34-1.98; P < .05), to an increased risk of NRM (HR = 2.06; 95% CI: 1.62-2.62; P < .05), and aGVHD (HR = 1.35; 95% CI: 1.07-1.71; P < .05). Additionally, sensitivity and subgroup analyses demonstrated that our pooled results were stable and reliable.

CONCLUSIONS

High pre-ASCT serum CRP was significantly associated with worse OS, as well as higher risk of NRM and aGVHD. CRP may be a candidate factor of updating the existing risk scoring systems or establishing a novel risk scoring systems, which has the potential of guiding patient selection for ASCT and proceeding with risk-adapted therapeutic strategies. However, more high-quality clinical studies and basic research are required to further validate our findings in view of several limitations in our meta-analysis.

Interleukin-6 in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: Its Possible Importance for Immunoregulation and As a Therapeutic Target

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is associated with a high risk of treatment-related mortality mainly caused by infections and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). GVHD is characterized by severe immune dysregulation and impaired regeneration of different tissues, i.e., epithelial barriers and the liver. The balance between pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine influences the risk of GVHD. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a cytokine that previously has been associated with pro-inflammatory effects. However, more recent evidence from various autoimmune diseases (e.g., inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatoid arthritis) has shown that the IL-6 activity is more complex with important effects also on tissue homeostasis, regeneration, and metabolism. This review summarizes the current understanding of how pro-inflammatory IL-6 effects exerted during the peritransplant period shapes T-cell polarization with enhancement of Th17 differentiation and suppression of regulatory T cells, and in addition we also review and discuss the results from trials exploring non-selective IL-6 inhibition in prophylaxis and treatment of GVHD. Emerging evidence suggests that the molecular strategy for targeting of IL-6-initiated intracellular signaling is important for the effect on GVHD. It will therefore be important to further characterize the role of IL-6 in the pathogenesis of GVHD to clarify whether combined IL-6 inhibition of both trans- (i.e., binding of the soluble IL-6/IL-6 receptor complex to cell surface gp130) and cis-signaling (i.e., IL-6 ligation of the IL-6 receptor/gp130 complex) or selective inhibition of trans-signaling should be tried in the prophylaxis and/or treatment of GVHD in allotransplant patients.