Prefibrotic versus overtly fibrotic primary myelofibrosis: clinical, cytogenetic, molecular and prognostic comparisons

Application Value of 68 Ga-FAPI PET/CT in the Evaluation of Myelofibrotic Diseases

PURPOSE

Fibroblast activation protein is highly expressed in neoplastic lesions and various fibrotic tissues, making it an attractive target for disease evaluation. 68 Ga-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI), a new tumor interstitial imaging agent, holds promise for evaluating myelofibrosis. Therefore, this study aimed to use 68 Ga-FAPI PET/CT for the noninvasive visualization and quantification of the extent of myelofibrosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective clinical study involving 22 patients with myelofibrosis who underwent 68 Ga-FAPI PET/CT. The uptake of 68 Ga-FAPI was measured in their respective bone marrow and spleen, and the obtained imaging findings were compared with laboratory, cytogenetic, and histopathological data.

RESULTS

68 Ga-FAPI uptake in the bone marrow was significantly and positively correlated with the myelofibrosis grade ( r > 0.8, P < 0.001). 68 Ga-FAPI PET/CT showed visually negative results in patients with grades 0-1 myelofibrosis and positive in those with grades 2-3, but the level of involvement varied. 68 Ga-FAPI PET/CT provides a noninvasive means of visualizing the extent of systemic bone marrow involvement and differentiation between the early and advanced stages of fibrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

68 Ga-FAPI PET/CT shows promise as a method for visualizing and quantifying myelofibrosis, providing suitable sites for bone marrow biopsy. The extent of 68 Ga-FAPI uptake by bone marrow increases with the progression of myelofibrosis, thus it is a simple and noninvasive measurement that can be used to evaluate the progression of myelofibrosis. Nevertheless, although 68 Ga-FAPI PET/CT has demonstrated a potential value in prognostic assessment, further confirmation is needed.

A lasso and random forest model using flow cytometry data identifies primary myelofibrosis

Thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), primary myelofibrosis (PMF), prefibrotic/early (pre-PMF), and overt fibrotic PMF (overt PMF) are classical Philadelphia-Negative (Ph-negative) myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Differentiating between these types based on morphology and molecular markers is challenging. This study aims to clarify the application of flow cytometry in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of classical MPNs. This study retrospectively analyzed the immunophenotypes, clinical characteristics, and laboratory findings of 211 Ph-negative MPN patients, including ET, PV, pre-PMF, overt PMF, and 47 controls. Compared to ET and PV, PMF differed in white blood cells, hemoglobin, blast cells in the peripheral blood, abnormal karyotype, and WT1 gene expression. PMF also differed from controls in CD34+ cells, granulocyte phenotype, monocyte phenotype, percentage of plasma cells, and dendritic cells. Notably, the PMF group had a significantly lower plasma cell percentage compared with other groups. A lasso and random forest model select five variables (CD34+CD19+cells and CD34+CD38- cells on CD34+cells, CD13dim+CD11b- cells in granulocytes, CD38str+CD19+/-plasma, and CD123+HLA-DR-basophils), which identify PMF with a sensitivity and specificity of 90%. Simultaneously, a classification and regression tree model was constructed using the percentage of CD34+CD38- on CD34+ cells and platelet counts to distinguish between ET and pre-PMF, with accuracies of 94.3% and 83.9%, respectively. Flow immunophenotyping aids in diagnosing PMF and differentiating between ET and PV. It also helps distinguish pre-PMF from ET and guides treatment decisions.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Diagnosis, Outcomes, and Management of Prefibrotic Myelofibrosis

Prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis (prefibrotic PMF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm with distinct characteristics comprising histopathological and clinico-biological parameters. It is classified as a subtype of primary myelofibrosis. In clinical practice, it is essential to correctly distinguish prefibrotic PMF from essential thrombocythemia especially but also overt PMF besides other myeloid neoplasms. Risk stratification and survival outcomes for prefibrotic PMF are worse than that of ET but better than that of overt PMF. Rates of progression to overt PMF and blast phase disease are also higher for prefibrotic PMF than ET. In this review we first discuss the historical context to the evolution of prefibrotic PMF as an entity, its presenting features and diagnostic criteria. We emphasize the differences between prefibrotic PMF, ET, and overt PMF with regards to presenting features and disease outcomes including thrombohemorrhagic events and progression to fibrotic and blast phase disease. Next, we discuss the risk stratification models and contextualize these in the setting of clinical management. We share our view of personalizing treatment to address unique patient needs in the context of currently available management options. Lastly, we discuss areas of critical need in clinical research and speculate on the possibility of future disease course modifying therapies in prefibrotic PMF.

The international consensus classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute Leukemias: myeloproliferative neoplasms

A group of international experts, including hematopathologists, oncologists, and geneticists were recently summoned (September 2021, Chicago, IL, USA) to update the 2016/17 World Health Organization classification system for hematopoietic tumors. After careful deliberation, the group introduced the new International Consensus Classification (ICC) for Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemias. This current in-depth review focuses on the ICC-2022 category of JAK2 mutation-prevalent myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs): essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera, primary myelofibrosis, and MPN, unclassifiable. The ICC MPN subcommittee chose to preserve the primary role of bone marrow morphology in disease classification and diagnostics, while also acknowledging the complementary role of genetic markers for establishing clonality, facilitating MPN subtype designation, and disease prognostication.

Splenic Infarction in Patients with Philadelphia-negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Objective We retrospectively analyzed the prevalence and clinical features of splenic infarctions in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (Ph^- MPNs). Patients Patients diagnosed with essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), prefibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis (pre-PMF), or PMF from January 1996 to October 2020 in Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea, were reviewed. Results A total of 347 patients (143 ET, 129 PV, 44 pre-PMF, and 31 PMF patients; 201 men and 146 women) with a median age of 64 (range 15-91) years old were followed up for a median of 4.7 (range 0.1-26.5) years. Fifteen (4.3%) patients exhibited splenic infarctions at the diagnosis. These were most common in PMF patients (12.9%), followed by pre-PMF (9.1%) and PV (5.4%) patients. Multifocal infarcts (60.0%) were most common, followed by solitary (33.3%) and extensive infarcts (6.7%). The cumulative incidence of thrombosis in patients with splenic infarctions tended to be higher than in those lacking infarctions (10-year incidence 46.7% vs. 21.0% in PV; p=0.215; 33.3% vs. 17.9% in pre-PMF; p=0.473) patients, but statistical significance was lacking. Palpable splenomegaly (hazard ratio 14.89; 95% confidence interval 4.00-55.35; p<0.001) was the only independent risk factor for splenic infarction. During follow-up, 5 (1.4%) patients developed splenic infarctions. Conservative treatment adequately controlled the symptoms; no serious complications were noted in any patient. Conclusion Splenic infarctions occurred most frequently in patients with PMF; it was rare in patients with ET. The clinical courses were generally mild.

Clinical Features, Gene Alterations, and Outcomes in Prefibrotic and Overt Primary and Secondary Myelofibrotic Patients

The Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are divided in three major groups: polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). The 2016 WHO classification incorporates also prefibrotic PMF (pre-PMF) and overt PMF. This study aimed to discriminate the clinical features, genetic alterations, and outcomes in patients with prefibrotic, overt PMF, and secondary MF (SMF). This study included 229 patients with diagnosed myelofibrosis (MF). Among 229 patients, 67 (29%), 122 (53%), and 40 (18%) were confirmed as SMF, overt PMF, and pre-PMF, respectively. The JAK2 V617F mutation was differentially distributed in SMF and PMF, contradictory to CALR and MPL mutations. Regarding nondriver mutations, the occurrence of ASXL1 mutations differed between PMF and SMF or pre-PMF. The three-year overall survival was 91.5%, 85.3%, and 94.8% in SMF, overt PMF, and pre-PMF groups. Various scoring systems could discriminate the overall survival in PMF but not in SMF and pre-PMF. Still, clinical features including anemia and thrombocytopenia were poor prognostic factors throughout the myelofibrosis, whereas mutations contributed differently. Molecular grouping by wild-type SF3B1 and SRSF2/RUNX1/U2AF1/ASXL1/TP53 mutations showed inferior progression-free survival (PFS) in PMF, SMF, and pre-PMF. We determined the clinical and genetic features related to poor prognosis in myelofibrosis.

Myeloproliferative Neoplasms, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

The classic Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) consist of myelofibrosis, polycythemia vera, and essential thrombocythemia and are a heterogeneous group of clonal blood disorders characterized by an overproduction of blood cells. The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for MPN were developed as a result of meetings convened by a multidisciplinary panel with expertise in MPN, with the goal of providing recommendations for the management of MPN in adults. The Guidelines include recommendations for the diagnostic workup, risk stratification, treatment, and supportive care strategies for the management of myelofibrosis, polycythemia vera, and essential thrombocythemia. Assessment of symptoms at baseline and monitoring of symptom status during the course of treatment is recommended for all patients. This article focuses on the recommendations as outlined in the NCCN Guidelines for the diagnosis of MPN and the risk stratification, management, and supportive care relevant to MF.

Clinical features and next-generation sequencing landscape of essential thrombocythemia, prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis, and overt fibrotic primary myelofibrosis: a Chinese monocentric retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

Since prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis (pre-PMF) was recognized as a separate entity in the 2016 revised classification of MPN differed from essential thrombocythemia (ET) or overt fibrotic primary myelofibrosis (overt PMF), it has been a subject of debate among experts due to its indefinite diagnosis.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical parameters, haematologic information, and genetic mutations of patients who were diagnosed with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) according to the WHO 2016 criteria in China, including 56 ET patients, 19 pre-PMF patients, and 43 overt PMF patients.

RESULTS

Pre-PMF patients exhibited higher leukocyte counts [14.2(6.0-28.1) × 10⁹/L vs 9.6(4.0-55.0) × 10⁹/L, P = 0.003], LDH values [307(233-479)U/L vs 241(129-1182)U/L, P < 0.001], onset ages [67(32-76) years vs 50(16-79) years, P = 0.006], a higher frequency of splenomegaly(47.4% vs 16.7%, P = 0.018) and hypertension (57.9 vs 23.2%, P = 0.005) than ET patients. On the other hand, pre-PMF patients had higher platelet counts [960(500-2245) × 10⁹/L vs 633(102-1720) × 10⁹/L, P = 0.017], haemoglobin levels [152(115-174)g/L vs 119(71-200)g/L, P = 0.003], lower LDH values [307(233-479)U/L vs 439(134-8100)U/L, P = 0.007] and a lower frequency of splenomegaly(47.4 vs 75.6%, P = 0.031) than overt PMF patients. Next-generation sequencing landscape was performed in 50 patients, revealed the frequency of EP300 mutations was significantly increased in pre-PMF patients compared with ET and overt PMF patients (60 vs 10 vs 15.79%, P = 0.033), and WT1 was more often overexpressed (WT1/ABL1 copies ≥ 1.0%) in patients with overt PMF than in those with ET or pre-PMF(54.55 vs 16.67 vs 17.65%, P = 0.009). In terms of outcome, male sex, along with symptoms including MPN10, anaemia (haemoglobin < 120 g/L), thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 100 × 10⁹/L), leucocytosis (leukocyte counts > 13 × 10⁹/L), high LDH value (> 350U/L), splenomegaly, WT1 overexpression(WT1/ABL1 copies ≥ 1.0%), KMT2A, ASXL1 and TP53 mutations, indicated a poor prognosis for PMF patients.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicated that a comprehensive evaluation of BM features, clinical phenotypes, haematologic parameters, and molecular profiles is needed for the accurate diagnosis and treatment of ET, pre-PMF, and overt PMF patients.

Novel Usefulness of Krebs von den Lungen 6 (KL-6) with Hemoglobin and Lactate Dehydrogenase for Assessing Bone Marrow Fibrosis

Bone marrow fibrosis (BMF) is manually assessed by reticulin and trichrome stain of bone marrow (BM) biopsy and graded on a semi-quantitative scale. Krebs von den Lungen 6 (KL-6) and Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer (M₂BPGi) are known to be associated with lung and liver fibrosis, respectively. We explored the usefulness of KL-6 and M₂BPGi to assess BMF. A total of 250 patients who underwent BM biopsy with hematologic or non-hematologic diseases were included, and 42 patients with lung and liver diseases were excluded. The patients’ data, including age, sex, diagnosis, white blood cell, hemoglobin (Hb), platelet, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were collected. Measured KL-6 and M₂BPGi levels were compared with reticulin grade (RG) (grade 0–3). KL-6 levels were significantly elevated with an increase in RG, but M₂BPGi did not show a significant difference. Hb, LDH, or KL-6 were independent predictors for BMF (odds ratio: 1.96, 2.26, 2.91, respectively), but showed poor predictive ability (area under the curve [AUC] 0.62, 0.61, 0.60, respectively). The combination of Hb, LDH, and KL-6 showed a significantly improved predictive ability for BMF (AUC 0.73; integrated discrimination improvement 0.057; category-free net reclassification improvement 0.625). This is the first study to evaluate the usefulness of KL-6 for assessing BMF. The combination of Hb, LDH, and KL-6 would be an objective and relevant biomarker approach and be applied to risk stratification for BMF.

Myelofibrosis: Genetic Characteristics and the Emerging Therapeutic Landscape

Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is one of three myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) that are morphologically and molecularly inter-related, the other two being polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET). MPNs are characterized by JAK-STAT-activating JAK2, CALR, or MPL mutations that give rise to stem cell-derived clonal myeloproliferation, which is prone to leukemic and, in case of PV and ET, fibrotic transformation. Abnormal megakaryocyte proliferation is accompanied by bone marrow fibrosis and characterizes PMF, while the clinical phenotype is pathogenetically linked to ineffective hematopoiesis and aberrant cytokine expression. Among MPN-associated driver mutations, type 1-like CALR mutation has been associated with favorable prognosis in PMF, while ASXL1, SRSF2, U2AF1-Q157, EZH2, CBL, and K/NRAS mutations have been shown to be prognostically detrimental. Such information has enabled development of exclusively genetic (GIPSS) and clinically integrated (MIPSSv2) prognostic models that facilitate individualized treatment decisions. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation remains the only treatment modality in MF with the potential to prolong survival, whereas drug therapy, including JAK2 inhibitors, is directed mostly at the inflammatory component of the disease and is therefore palliative in nature. Similarly, disease-modifying activity remains elusive for currently available investigational drugs, while their additional value in symptom management awaits controlled confirmation. There is a need for genetic characterization of clinical observations followed by in vitro and in vivo preclinical studies that will hopefully identify therapies that target the malignant clone in MF to improve patient outcomes.

Mutational spectrum and prognosis in Chinese patients with prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis

Prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis (Pre‐PMF) has been classified as a separate entity of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Pre‐PMF is clinically heterogeneous but a specific prognostic model is lacking. Gene mutations have emerged as useful tools for stratification of myelofibrosis patients. However, there have been limited studies comprehensively investigating the mutational spectrum and its clinicopathological significance in pre‐PMF subjects. In this study, we addressed these issues by profiling the mutation status of 141 genes in 172 Chinese MPN patients including 72 pre‐PMF cases. Our findings corroborated the clinical/molecular distinctiveness of pre‐PMF and suggested a refined risk classification strategy for this entity.

New Markers of Disease Progression in Myelofibrosis

Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm due to the clonal proliferation of a hematopoietic stem cell. The vast majority of patients harbor a somatic gain of function mutation either of JAK2 or MPL or CALR genes in their hematopoietic cells, resulting in the activation of the JAK/STAT pathway. Patients display variable clinical and laboratoristic features, including anemia, thrombocytopenia, splenomegaly, thrombotic complications, systemic symptoms, and curtailed survival due to infections, thrombo-hemorrhagic events, or progression to leukemic transformation. New drugs have been developed in the last decade for the treatment of PMF-associated symptoms; however, the only curative option is currently represented by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, which can only be offered to a small percentage of patients. Disease prognosis is based at diagnosis on the classical International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) and Dynamic-IPSS (during disease course), which comprehend clinical parameters; recently, new prognostic scoring systems, including genetic and molecular parameters, have been proposed as meaningful tools for a better patient stratification. Moreover, new biological markers predicting clinical evolution and patient survival have been associated with the disease. This review summarizes basic concepts of PMF pathogenesis, clinics, and therapy, focusing on classical prognostic scoring systems and new biological markers of the disease.

Gene expression profile correlates with molecular and clinical features in patients with myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis (MF) belongs to the family of classic Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). It can be primary myelofibrosis (PMF) or secondary myelofibrosis (SMF) evolving from polycythemia vera (PV) or essential thrombocythemia (ET). Despite the differences, PMF and SMF patients are currently managed in the same way, and prediction of survival is based on the same clinical and genetic features. In the last few years, interest has grown concerning the ability of gene expression profiles (GEPs) to provide valuable prognostic information. Here, we studied the GEPs of granulocytes from 114 patients with MF, using a microarray platform to identify correlations with patient characteristics and outcomes. Cox regression analysis led to the identification of 201 survival-related transcripts characterizing patients who are at high risk for death. High-risk patients identified by this gene signature displayed an inferior overall survival and leukemia-free survival, together with clinical and molecular detrimental features included in contemporary prognostic models, such as the presence of high molecular risk mutations. The high-risk group was enriched in post-PV and post-ET MF and JAK2V617F homozygous patients, whereas pre-PMF was more frequent in the low-risk group. These results demonstrate that GEPs in MF patients correlate with their molecular and clinical features, particularly their survival, and represent the proof of concept that GEPs might provide complementary prognostic information to be applied in clinical decision making.

Primary myelofibrosis: 2021 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized by stem cell-derived clonal myeloproliferation that is often but not always accompanied by JAK2, CALR, or MPL mutations. Additional disease features include bone marrow reticulin/collagen fibrosis, aberrant inflammatory cytokine expression, anemia, hepatosplenomegaly, extramedullary hematopoiesis (EMH), constitutional symptoms, cachexia, leukemic progression, and shortened survival.

DIAGNOSIS

Bone marrow morphology is the primary basis for diagnosis. Presence of JAK2, CALR, or MPL mutation, expected in around 90% of the patients, is supportive but not essential for diagnosis; these mutations are also prevalent in the closely related MPNs, namely polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET). The 2016 World Health Organization classification system distinguishes "prefibrotic" from "overtly fibrotic" PMF; the former might mimic ET in its presentation. Furthermore, approximately 15% of patients with ET or PV might progress into a PMF-like phenotype (post-ET/PV MF) during their clinical course.

ADVERSE MUTATIONS

SRSF2, ASXL1, and U2AF1-Q157 mutations predict inferior survival in PMF, independent of each other and other risk factors. RAS/CBL mutations predicted resistance to ruxolitinib therapy.

ADVERSE KARYOTYPE

Very high risk abnormalities include -7, inv (3), i(17q), +21, +19, 12p-, and 11q-.

RISK STRATIFICATION

Two new prognostic systems for PMF have recently been introduced: GIPSS (genetically-inspired prognostic scoring system) and MIPSS70+ version 2.0 (MIPSSv2; mutation- and karyotype-enhanced international prognostic scoring system). GIPSS is based exclusively on mutations and karyotype. MIPSSv2 includes, in addition, clinical risk factors. GIPSS features four and MIPSSv2 five risk categories.

RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY

Observation alone is advised for MIPSSv2 "low" and "very low" risk disease (estimated 10-year survival 56%-92%); allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) is the preferred treatment for "very high" and "high" risk disease (estimated 10-year survival 0%-13%); treatment-requiring patients with intermediate-risk disease (estimated 10-year survival 30%) are best served by participating in clinical trials. In non-transplant candidates, conventional treatment for anemia includes androgens, prednisone, thalidomide, and danazol; for symptomatic splenomegaly, hydroxyurea and ruxolitinib; and for constitutional symptoms, ruxolitinib. Fedratinib, another JAK2 inhibitor, has now been FDA-approved for use in ruxolitinib failures. Splenectomy is considered for drug-refractory splenomegaly and involved field radiotherapy for non-hepatosplenic EMH and extremity bone pain.

NEW DIRECTIONS

A number of new agents, alone or in combination with ruxolitinib, are currently under investigation for MF treatment (ClinicalTrials.gov); preliminary results from some of these clinical trials were presented at the 2020 ASH annual meeting and highlighted in the current document.

The 2020 revision of the guidelines for the management of myeloproliferative neoplasms

In 2016, the World Health Organization revised the diagnostic criteria for myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) based on the discovery of disease-driving genetic aberrations and extensive analysis of the clinical characteristics of patients with MPNs. Recent studies have suggested that additional somatic mutations have a clinical impact on the prognosis of patients harboring these genetic abnormalities. Treatment strategies have also advanced with the introduction of JAK inhibitors, one of which has been approved for the treatment of patients with myelofibrosis and those with hydroxyurea-resistant or intolerant polycythemia vera. Recently developed drugs aim to elicit hematologic responses, as well as symptomatic and molecular responses, and the response criteria were refined accordingly. Based on these changes, we have revised the guidelines and present the diagnosis, treatment, and risk stratification of MPNs encountered in Korea.

The new WHO classification for essential thrombocythemia calls for revision of available evidences

In the 2016 revised classification of myeloproliferative neoplasms pre-fibrotic primary myelofibrosis (pre-PMF) was recognized as a separate entity, distinct from essential thrombocythemia (ET). Owing that the majority of cases falling in the pre-PMF category were previously diagnosed as ET, one may question about the need to re-evaluate the results of epidemiologic, clinical, and molecular studies, and the results of clinical trials in the two entities. Based on a critical review of recently published studies, pre-PMF usually presents with a distinct clinical and hematological presentation and higher frequency of constitutional symptoms. JAK2V617F and CALR mutations in pre-PMF patients are superimposable to ET, whereas non-driver high-risk mutations are enriched in pre-PMF compared with ET. Thrombosis is not significantly different, whereas bleeding is more frequent in pre-PMF. Median survival is significantly shorter in pre-PMF and 10-year cumulative rates progression to overt myelofibrosis is 0-1% vs. 10-12%, and leukemic transformation is 1-2% vs. 2-6%, in ET and pre-fibrotic-PMF, respectively. Most patients fall in the lower prognostic IPSS group in which observation alone can be recommended. Patients at intermediate risk may require a symptom-driven treatment for anemia, splenomegaly or constitutional symptoms while cytoreductive drugs are indicated in the high-risk category.

Targeted next-generation sequencing in blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasms

Among 248 consecutive patients with blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN-BP), DNA collected at the time of blast transformation was available in 75 patients (median age, 66 years; 64% men). MPN-BP followed primary myelofibrosis in 39 patients, essential thrombocythemia in 20 patients, and polycythemia vera in 16 patients. A myeloid neoplasm-relevant 33-gene panel was used for next-generation sequencing. Driver mutation distribution was JAK2 57%, CALR 20%, MPL 9%, and triple-negative 13%. Sixty-four patients (85%) harbored other mutations/variants, including 37% with ≥3 mutations; most frequent were ASXL1 47%, TET2 19%, RUNX1 17%, TP53 16%, EZH2 15%, and SRSF2 13%; relative mutual exclusivity was expressed by TP53, EZH2, LNK, RUNX1, SRSF2, and NRAS/KRAS mutations. Paired chronic-blast phase sample analysis was possible in 19 patients and revealed more frequent blast phase acquisition of ASXL1, EZH2, LNK, TET2, TP53, and PTPN11 mutations/variants. In multivariable analysis, RUNX1 and PTPN11 mutations/variants were associated with shorter survival duration; respective hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence interval [CI]) were 2.1 (95% CI, 1.1-3.8) and 3.0 (95% CI, 1.1-6.6). An all-inclusive multivariable analysis confirmed the prognostic relevance of RUNX1 mutations (HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.5-5.5) and also showed additional contribution from a treatment strategy that includes transplant or induction of complete or near-complete remission (HR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2-0.5). The current study points to specific mutations that might bear pathogenetic relevance for leukemic transformation in MPN and also suggest an adverse survival effect of RUNX1 mutations.

Prefibrotic myelofibrosis: treatment algorithm 2018

Prefibrotic myelofibrosis (pre-PMF) is a distinct entity among chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm diagnosed according to the revised 2016 WHO classification. The clinical picture is heterogeneous, ranging from isolated thrombocytosis, mimicking essential thrombocythemia (ET), to symptoms of high-risk PMF. Retrospective studies showed that survival of patients with pre-PMF is worse than that of ET and better than overt PMF. Whilst a specific prognostic score is lacking, the International Prognostic Scoring System is able to predict survival in pre-PMF patients, yet failing to separate intermediate-1 and -2 groups, and can be used in clinical practice. Each patient should be evaluated for, and interventions adapted to, both life-expectancy and the risk of bleeding and thrombosis. In low-risk patients with expected long survival, observation only is recommended; in cumulated intermediate-1 and -2 risk cases, whose median survival is projected at more than 10 years, treatment is based on symptoms; in high risk cases, with median survival lower than 5 years, intensive management is required. A pragmatic approach to address the risk of bleeding and thrombosis includes: no treatment or low-dose aspirin in asymptomatic patients; aspirin or oral anticoagulation if previous arterial or venous thrombosis, and hydroxyurea as first-line cytoreduction in case of thrombocytosis or leukocytosis.

Myelofibrosis Treatment Algorithm 2018

Two novel prognostic systems for primary myelofibrosis (PMF) were recently unveiled: GIPSS (genetically inspired prognostic scoring system) and MIPSS70 (mutation-enhanced international prognostic scoring system for transplant-age patients). GIPSS is based exclusively on genetic markers: mutations and karyotype. MIPSS70 includes mutations and clinical risk factors. In its most recent adaptation, the prognostic value of MIPSS70 has been bolstered by the inclusion of a three-tiered cytogenetic risk stratification and use of hemoglobin thresholds that are adjusted for sex and severity (MIPSS70+ version 2.0). GIPSS features four, MIPSS70 three, and MIPSS70+ version 2.0 five risk categories. MIPSS70 is most useful in the absence of cytogenetic information. MIPSS70+ version 2.0 is more comprehensive than MIPSS70 and is the preferred model in the presence of cytogenetic information. Both MIPSS70 and MIPSS70+ version 2.0 require an online score calculator (http://www.mipss70score.it). GIPPS offers a lower complexity prognostic tool that reliably identifies candidates for allogeneic stem cell transplant (GIPSS high-risk disease) or long-term observation with little or no therapeutic intervention (GIPSS low-risk disease). Ultimately, we favor a step-wise prognostication approach that starts with GIPSS but also considers MIPSS70+ version 2.0 for confirming the most appropriate treatment approach for the individual patient.

Diagnosis and management of prefibrotic myelofibrosis

INTRODUCTION

The 2016 WHO classification comprises two stages of primary myelofibrosis (PMF): early/prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis (pre-PMF) and overt fibrotic PMF (overt PMF). Diagnostic criteria rely on bone marrow morphology, fibrosis grade (0-1 in pre-PMF, 2-3 in overt PMF), and clinical features (leukoerythroblastosis, anemia, leucocytosis, increased lactate dehydrogenase, and palpable splenomegaly). An accurate differentiation from essential thrombocythemia (ET) is pivotal because the two entities show different clinical presentation and outcome, in terms of survival, leukemic evolution, and rates of progression to overt myelofibrosis. Areas covered: The current review provides an overview on how to diagnose and stratify patients with pre-PMF, taking into account their definite and peculiar risk of vascular event, which is often neglected, and their milder disease course, compared with overt PMF, with the aim of improving and individualizing their counseling and management. Expert commentary: Pre-PMF is a new entity characterized by a unique combination of both a thrombo-hemorrhagic risk (that brings it closer to PV and ET) and a definite risk of disease evolution (that places pre-PMF somewhat closer to the overt PMF variant).

Ruxolitinib for the Treatment of Essential Thrombocythemia

Deregulated Janus Kinase 2 (JAK2) activation is central to the pathogenesis of most myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), of which essential thrombocythemia (ET) is the most common entity. Patients with ET are risk-stratified according to their risk of thrombo-hemorrhagic complications. High-risk patients are offered treatments to reduce their platelet count using cytoreductive therapy. The disease course is often long and therapy intolerance is not infrequent. Ruxolitinib, a Janus Kinase (JAK) 1/JAK2 inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in patients with both myelofibrosis (MF) and polycythemia vera and is well tolerated. Side effects include predictable cytopenias and an augmented risk of infections. Ruxolitinib has been investigated in a small group of ET patients who were refractory/intolerant to hydroxycarbamide (HC) and demonstrated improvements in both symptoms and splenomegaly. Of note, a proportion of treated patients (13.2%) also had a significant reduction in platelet counts. However, these results require further validation in comparison with conventional therapy. Recently, a randomized-controlled phase 2 study (MAJIC-ET) assessed the role of Ruxolitinib in patients refractory or intolerant to HC. This study revealed that Ruxolitinib demonstrated some clinical efficacy but was only superior in terms of symptom control. In clinical practice, some individuals with ET do exhaust all potential treatment options and there may well be a role for Ruxolitinib in such patients or those with a significant symptom burden. However, in the wider context the goal of therapy with the use of JAK inhibitor therapy in ET needs to be defined carefully and we explore this within this timely review article.

Driver mutations and prognosis in primary myelofibrosis: Mayo-Careggi MPN alliance study of 1,095 patients

The 2013 discovery of calreticulin (CALR) mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasms was attended by their association with longer survival in primary myelofibrosis (PMF). Subsequent studies have suggested prognostic distinction between type 1/like and type 2/like CALR mutations and detrimental effect from triple-negative mutational status. Among 709 Mayo Clinic patients with PMF, 467 (66%) harbored JAK2, 112 (16%) CALR type 1/like, 24 (3.4%) CALR type 2/like, 38 (5.4%) MPL mutations and 68 (10%) were triple-negative. Survival was longer with type 1/like CALR, compared to JAK2 (HR 2.6, 95% CI 1.9-3.5), type 2/like CALR (HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.4-4.5), MPL (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-2.9) and triple-negative mutational status (HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.6-3.6), but otherwise similar between the non-type 1/like CALR mutational states (P = .41). In multivariable analysis, the absence of type 1/like CALR (P < .001; HR 2, 95% CI 1.4-2.7), presence of ASXL1/SRSF2 mutations (P < .001; HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.5-2.4) and DIPSS-plus (P < .001) were each predictive of inferior survival. Furthermore, among 210 patients with ASXL1/SRSF2 mutations, survival was significantly longer in the presence vs. absence of type 1/like CALR mutations (median 5.8 vs. 2.9 years; P < .001). Triple-negative status did not disclose additional prognostic information for overall or leukemia-free survival. The observations regarding the prognostic distinction between CALR mutation variants were validated in an external cohort of 386 patients from the University of Florence Careggi hospital. We conclude that type 1/like CALR mutations in PMF not only predict superior survival, but also partially amend the detrimental effect of high molecular risk mutations.

The 2016 WHO classification and diagnostic criteria for myeloproliferative neoplasms: document summary and in-depth discussion

The new edition of the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification system for tumors of the hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues was published in September 2017. Under the category of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), the revised document includes seven subcategories: chronic myeloid leukemia, chronic neutrophilic leukemia, polycythemia vera (PV), primary myelofibrosis (PMF), essential thrombocythemia (ET), chronic eosinophilic leukemia-not otherwise specified and MPN, unclassifiable (MPN-U); of note, mastocytosis is no longer classified under the MPN category. In the current review, we focus on the diagnostic criteria for JAK2/CALR/MPL mutation-related MPNs: PV, ET, and PMF. In this regard, the 2016 changes were aimed at facilitating the distinction between masked PV and JAK2-mutated ET and between prefibrotic/early and overtly fibrotic PMF. In the current communication, we (i) provide practically useful resource tables and graphs on the new diagnostic criteria including outcome, (ii) elaborate on the rationale for the 2016 changes, (iii) discuss the complementary role of mutation screening, (iv) address ongoing controversies and propose solutions, (v) attend to the challenges of applying WHO criteria in routine clinical practice, and (vi) outline future directions from the perspectives of the clinical pathologist.

SOHO State-of-the-Art Update and Next Questions: MPN

The discovery of the activating Janus kinase (JAK)2V617F mutation in 2005 in most patients with the classic Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) spurred intense interest in research into these disorders, culminating in the identification of activating mutations in MPL in 2006 and indels in the gene encoding calreticulin (CALR) in 2013, thus providing additional mechanistic explanations for the universal activation of JAK-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) observed in these conditions, and the success of the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib, which first received regulatory approval in 2011. The field has continued to advance rapidly since then, and the past 2 years have witnessed important changes to the classification of MPN and diagnostic criteria for polycythemia vera (PV), novel insights into the mechanisms of bone marrow fibrosis in primary myelofibrosis (PMF), increasing appreciation of the biologic differences between essential thrombocythemia (ET), prefibrotic and overt PMF, and between primary and post-PV/ET myelofibrosis (MF). Additionally, the mechanisms through which mutant CALR drives JAK-STAT pathway activation and oncogenic transformation are now better understood. Although mastocytosis is no longer included under the broad heading of MPN in the 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification, an important milestone in mastocytosis research was reached in 2017 with the regulatory approval of midostaurin for patients with advanced systemic mastocytosis (AdvSM). In this article, we review the major recent developments in the areas of PV, ET, and MF, and also briefly summarize the literature on midostaurin and other KIT inhibitors for patients with AdvSM.