Management of relapse in acute promyelocytic leukaemia treated with up-front arsenic trioxide-based regimens

Therapeutic horizon of acute myeloid leukemia: Success, optimism, and challenges

Focused research in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) biology and treatment has led to the identification of new therapeutic targets and several new drug approvals over the last decade. Progressive improvements in response and survival have mirrored these improvements in treatment options. Traditionally adverse subtypes such as FLT3-internal tandem duplication-positive AML now have better outcomes with potent FLT3 inhibitors, and menin inhibitors in KMT2A-rearranged and other MEIS/HOX-dependent leukemias hold promise toward improving outcomes. More patients with AML are now able to undergo a consolidative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and the rates of nonrelapse mortality with or without HSCT have also decreased. Comprehensive genomic interrogation of AML has elucidated mechanisms of response and resistance to treatments, which has enabled more precise decision algorithms and better prognostication. Deep levels of measurable residual disease assessment in some AML subsets hold the potential to dynamically modify treatment on the basis of these responses. Improving frontline intensive and low-intensity therapies, by incorporating venetoclax and other targeted agents, is the most important intervention to improve AML outcomes. Despite these developments, a sizeable percentage of AML, such as AML with TP53 or MECOM aberrations, postmyeloproliferative neoplasm AML, and so forth, remains as subsets without significant improvement in outcomes and no targeted options. Evolving strategies with natural killer cell-based approaches, novel antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific T-cell engagers, and engineered chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies are being evaluated, and may fill the therapeutic vacuum for some of the high-risk AML subtypes.

Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms following curative treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia: incidence, correlation with therapeutic regimen, and future directions

All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO) have revolutionized the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), offering a cure rate of > 80%. Along with improved survival, the long-term consequences of anti-APL therapy are becoming increasingly apparent, including potential therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MNs). T-MNs are well known to arise after cytotoxic chemotherapy, but the leukemogenic potential of regimens utilizing only ATRA/ATO is not well established. The objective of this study is to examine the incidence, long-term risk, and clinicopathologic features of t-MNs arising after anti-APL therapy and how they correlates with the therapeutic regimen employed. We retrospectively collected treated APL patients between 01/2001 and 02/2021, categorized them into ATRA/ATO + chemo and ATRA/ATO groups based on the regimen used, and evaluated for the development of t-MN. A total of 110 APL patients were identified, including 67 (61%) treated with ATRA/ATO + chemo and 43 (39%) treated with ATRA/ATO only. Overall, 4/110 (3.6%) patients developed t-MNs, with all four emerging in the ATRA/ATO + chemo group. Ultimately, the incidence of t-MN in ATRA/ATO + chemo group was significantly higher compared with ATRA/ATO only group(5.97% vs. 0.0%, respectively; p = 0.0289). Our data spanning over two decades suggests that conventional chemotherapy for APL is associated with a small but significant risk of t-MN, whereas ATR/ATO does not carry this risk. This takes on new significance, considering several recent and ongoing trials have shown that a chemotherapy-free approach might become feasible for all risk APL types in the near future. Consequently, the omission of leukemogenic and arguably unnecessary chemotherapy from APL regimens may reduce the incidence of t-MNs in long-term survivors without sacrificing their cure rates.

Response Rates and Transplantation Impact in Patients with Relapsed Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia

BACKGROUND

The introduction of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO) has radically improved the prognosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), with cure rates above 80%. While relapse occurs in less than 20% of cases, addressing this issue remains challenging. Identifying effective salvage therapies for relapsed APL is crucial to improve patient outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on a multicentric cohort of 67 APL patients in first relapse, treated in three Italian hematology centers from June 1981 to November 2021. The overall survival (OS) and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) were calculated, and predictive factors were assessed using Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Overall, 61 patients (91%) received ATO ± ATRA (40.3%), chemo-based regimens (40.3%), or ATRA ± Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) (10.4%). Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 98.2% of patients (molecular CR, n = 71.4%). With a median follow-up time of 54.5 months, the 5-year OS was 73% in the ATO ± ATRA group, 44% in the chemo-based group, and 29% in the ATRA ± GO group (p = 0.035). The 5-year OS rate was also higher for transplant recipients vs. non-recipients within the chemo-based cohort (50% vs. 33%, p = 0.017), but not in the ATO-based cohort (p = 0.12). ATO-based salvage therapy resulted in better OS in both univariate (p = 0.025) and multivariate analyses (p = 0.026). The 2-year CIR was higher in patients without molecular CR vs. patients in molecular CR (66% vs. 24%, p = 0.034). Molecular CR was a significant predictor of second relapse in both univariate (p = 0.035) and multivariate analyses (p = 0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support the efficacy of ATO-based therapies in first relapse of APL and confirm the achievement of molecular remission as an independent outcome predictor in both first and second APL relapse.

Realgar-indigo naturalis formula for the treatment of patients with relapsed and arsenic trioxide-resistant acute promyelocytic leukemia: A case series

INTRODUCTION

There is currently no standard treatment for relapsed and arsenic trioxide (ATO)-resistant acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Here, we report a case series of realgar-indigo naturalis formula (RIF) for the successful treatment of patients with relapsed and ATO-resistant APL.

CASE PRESENTATION

Two patients in the first relapse and one in the second relapse failed to achieve hematologic complete remission (HCR) when reinduced by ATO; the other five patients progressed to relapse during ATO-based regimens for post-remission therapy. These eight patients received RIF in three doses per day totaling 130 mg/kg (≤ 30 pills) as induction therapy and achieved HCR at a median time of 46.5 days. They received 5 years of post-remission therapy, which consisted of combined chemotherapy followed by RIF. During this period, the patients did not experience renal dysfunction or QT interval prolongation. At the last follow-up, three patients survived without relapse, two patients survived with a second or third relapse and third or fourth remission, and the other three patients relapsed for a third or fourth time and died. The 5-year overall survival and event-free survival rates were 75.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 31.5-93.1) and 37.5% (95% CI: 5.6-71.7), respectively.

CONCLUSION

RIF for induction therapy and RIF combined with chemotherapy for post-remission therapy may represent an effective and safe protocol for the treatment of patients with relapsed and ATO-resistant APL. Please cite this article as: Fang YG, Huang SL, Chen NN. Realgar-indigo naturalis formula for the treatment of patients with relapsed and arsenic trioxide-resistant acute promyelocytic leukemia: a case series. J Integr Med. 2024; 22(5): 614-620.

Efficacy of Autologous and Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Adults with Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: Results of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Despite therapeutic advances for acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) with the emergence of all-trans retinoic acid, arsenic trioxide, and gemtuzumab-ozogamycin, approximately 10% of patients still experience disease relapse, typically occurring within 24 to 36 months following completion of front-line treatment. Traditionally, both allogeneic (allo) and autologous (auto) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) have been considered reasonable treatment options for relapsed APL; however, no randomized controlled studies have been conducted comparing allo-HCT and auto-HCT in patients with relapsed APL. We performed a systematic review/meta-analysis to assess the totality of evidence pertaining to allo-HCT or auto-HCT in relapsed APL. Our search identified 1158 references, of which 23 met our inclusion criteria. While acknowledging the limitations of comparing these 2 treatment modalities indirectly, based on results from separate meta-analyses, it appears that pooled rates of event-free survival (71% versus 54%), progression-free survival (63% versus 43%), and overall survival (82% versus 58%) are higher after auto-HCT. This difference can be explained in part by the higher risk of pooled nonrelapse mortality (NRM) in patients undergoing allo-HCT (29% versus 5%), owing to inherent risks associated with this modality. In the absence of a randomized prospective clinical trial comparing allo-HCT and auto-HCT, our results show that both modalities are acceptable in patients with relapsed APL. The higher pooled NRM rate with allo-HCT is an important consideration when choosing this option. Additionally, the comparable pooled relapse rate for auto-HCT and allo-HCT (24% versus 23%) provides a rationale for evaluating post-HCT consolidative strategies to mitigate this risk.

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia in the Era of All-Trans Retinoic Acid (ATRA) and Arsenic Trioxide (ATO)

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) currently represents one of the malignant hemopathies with the best therapeutic responses, following the introduction of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and subsequently of arsenic trioxide (ATO) treatment. As a result, a large proportion of patients with APL achieve long-term responses after first-line therapy, so performing a hematopoietic stem cell transplant as consolidation of first complete remission (CR) is no longer necessary. Even in the case of relapses, most patients obtain a new remission as a result of therapy with ATO and ATRA, but an effective consolidation treatment is necessary to maintain it. The experience accumulated from studies published in the last two decades shows the effectiveness of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in improving the outcome of patients who achieve a new CR. Thus, the expert groups recommend transplantation as consolidation therapy in patients with a second CR, with the indication for autologous HSCT in cases with molecular CR and for allogeneic HSCT in patients with the persistence of minimal residual disease (MRD) or with early relapse. However, there is a variety of controversial aspects related to the role of HSCT in APL, ranging from the fact that outcome data are obtained almost exclusively from retrospective studies and historical analyses to questions related to the type of transplantation, the impact of minimal residual disease, conditioning regimens, or the role of other therapeutic options. All these questions justify the need for controlled prospective studies in the following years.

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Patients with Relapsed Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia

Although autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is an established therapy for patients with relapsed acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) after returning to complete remission (CR), the role of allogeneic HCT remains unclear for treating relapsed APL. This study aimed to investigate allogeneic HCT outcomes in patients with relapsed APL, focusing particularly on those who underwent transplantation in non-CR and those who had relapsed after prior autologous HCT. We retrospectively analyzed Japanese nationwide transplantation registry data of patients with relapsed APL age ≥16 years who underwent allogeneic HCT between 2006 and 2020. A total of 195 patients were eligible for this analysis, including 69 who underwent transplantation in non-CR and 55 who relapsed after prior autologous HCT. The median duration of follow-up for survivors was 5.4 years. Multivariate analysis revealed that both non-CR at transplantation (hazard ratio [HR], 1.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12 to 2.71; P = .014) and prior autologous HCT (HR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.28 to 3.44; P = .013) were associated with higher risks of overall mortality. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates for patients who underwent transplantation in CR and non-CR were 58% and 39%, respectively (P = .085), if they did not have a history of prior autologous HCT. In the patients who had relapsed after prior autologous HCT, the 5-year OS rate was 47% for those who underwent allogeneic HCT in CR and 6% for those who did so in non-CR (P = .001). Allogeneic HCT still provides an opportunity for long-term survival for certain patients with relapsed APL for whom autologous HCT is unlikely to be effective. The dismal outcome of those with prior autologous HCT who underwent allogeneic HCT in non-CR poses a significant therapeutic challenge.

Inhibition of human APE1 and MTH1 DNA repair proteins by dextran-coated γ-Fe2O3 ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles

Aim: To quantitatively evaluate the inhibition of human DNA repair proteins APE1 and MTH1 by dextran-coated γ-Fe₂O₃ ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (dUSPIONs). Materials & methods: Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry with isotope-dilution was used to measure the expression levels of APE1 and MTH1 in MCL-5 cells exposed to increasing doses of dUSPIONs. The expression levels of APE1 and MTH1 were measured in cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions of cell extracts. Results: APE1 and MTH1 expression was significantly inhibited in both cell fractions at the highest dUSPION dose. The expression of MTH1 was linearly inhibited across the full dUSPION dose range in both fractions. Conclusion: These findings warrant further studies to characterize the capacity of dUSPIONs to inhibit other DNA repair proteins in vitro and in vivo.

Treatment for relapsed acute promyelocytic leukemia

The advent of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO) has significantly improved the outcomes of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL); nevertheless, a small fraction of patients still experience relapse. Due to the infrequency of APL relapse coupled with the rapid change in the therapeutic landscape, there are limited available data regarding the treatment of relapsed APL. In this situation, however, ATO-based therapy has been shown to result in high rates of hematological and molecular complete remission (CR). Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is considered the postremission therapy of choice when patients achieve molecular CR, whereas recent studies have suggested that molecular CR is not prerequisite for the success of autologous HCT. Allogeneic HCT can be reserved for selected patients, i.e., those who cannot achieve CR and those who relapse after autologous HCT, because of high toxicities and the expectation of highly favorable outcomes with autologous HCT during CR. For patients who are ineligible for HCT, prolonged administration of ATRA + ATO would be a viable option. To further refine the therapy for patients with relapsed APL, it is imperative to aggregate clinical data of patients who relapse after the ATRA + ATO frontline therapy within the framework of national and international collaboration.

Treatment for relapsed acute promyelocytic leukemia: what is the best post-remission treatment?

Background

Arsenic trioxide (ATO) is the standard treatment for relapsed acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). However, consensus on post-remission therapies is still lacking.

Methods

We evaluated 52 patients who experienced relapse following initial treatment of APL between 2000 and 2019 at Catholic Hematology Hospital. Among them, 41 patients received reinduction treatment, 30 with ATO-based regimen, whereas 11 with conventional intensive chemotherapy (IC).

Results

The ATO reinduction group showed a significantly higher second molecular complete remission (mCR2) rate, superior neutrophil and platelet recovery, and a lower infection rate than the IC reinduction group. No significant differences were observed in survival outcomes after post-remission treatment among the ATO-based (N=19), autologous (N=12), and allogeneic (N=6) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) groups. In the ATO-based and autologous HSCT groups, among patients with mCR2 after ATO reinduction, nine and five patients experienced a second relapse, respectively (50.7% vs. 41.7%, P=0.878). Among these patients, seven received salvage allogeneic HSCT; six remained alive. The other seven patients received ATO without HSCT. Five died from disease progression, and two survived and have been in mCR2 since.

Conclusion

Post-remission treatment outcomes of patients with relapsed APL were not significantly different, regardless of the treatment option, suggesting the feasibility of ATO-based treatment without HSCT in mCR2. Allogeneic HSCT may be an effective salvage treatment modality for patients with a second relapse. Owing to a few cases of relapsed APL, multicenter prospective studies may help elucidate the efficacy of each post-remission treatment.

Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin Followed by Unrelated Cord Blood Transplantation With Reduced-intensity Conditioning for a Child With Refractory Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia

There is no established treatment for patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) refractory to targeted therapies with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and/or arsenic trioxide (ATO). We report here a case of an 8-month-old girl with APL who failed standard ATRA-combined chemotherapy. Although molecular remission was achieved after introducing ATRA/ATO combination therapy, molecular relapse occurred during the ATO consolidation courses. Subsequent molecular remission was rapidly achieved after administering 2 doses of gemtuzumab ozogamicin. She was successfully treated with unrelated cord blood transplantation using reduced-intensity conditioning. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin might be a preferable choice for patients with APL refractory to standard therapy.

Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation during second or subsequent complete remission of acute promyelocytic leukemia: a prognostic factor analysis

Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is an effective therapy for patients with relapsed acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). However, it remains unclear whether this procedure is equally effective for certain groups of patients. To address this question, we analyzed 296 patients with APL who had undergone autologous HCT during second or subsequent complete remission (CR2+) between 2006 and 2019. Among them, 24 patients were ≥65 years old, and 17 underwent autologous HCT during third or subsequent CR. Of the 286 patients whose measurable residual disease (MRD) data were available, 21 showed detectable MRD. The 5-year probabilities of relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival, relapse, and nonrelapse mortality for the entire cohort were 85%, 88%, 9%, and 6%, respectively. The multivariate analysis revealed that the duration of first CR ( < or ≥2 years) was the sole factor associated with RFS (P = 0.002), but even those with CR1 duration <2 years showed a 5-year RFS of 76%. The other factors such as age, disease status, and MRD status were not predictive for the survival outcomes. Our findings demonstrate very favorable long-term results when autologous HCT is conducted during CR2 + across the various subgroups of patients with relapsed APL.