The impact of B-cell-directed therapy on SARS-CoV-2 vaccine efficacy in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

Dual-targeted regimens for the frontline treatment of CLL

The treatment landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has evolved considerably over the past decade due to the development of effective novel agents with varying mechanisms of action, including Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) and B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) inhibitors. Extrapolating upon the success of anti-CD20-directed chemoimmunotherapy, a dual-targeted approach has been explored in treatment-naive patients with CLL. Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody combinations with BTK inhibitors as well as BCL2 inhibitors have demonstrated superiority over traditional cytotoxic chemoimmunotherapy regimens such as fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab; bendamustine-rituximab; and obinutuzumab-chlorambucil. Impressive clinical benefit is seen in both younger and older patients, those with comorbidities, and, most importantly, those with poor prognostic features. Given this success, combinations of BTK inhibitors and venetoclax have been explored in clinical trials. These dual-targeted regimens provide remarkable efficacy while allowing for an all-oral approach and fixed duration of treatment. Current investigations under way are evaluating the utility of a triplet approach with the addition of obinutuzumab in comparison to a doublet approach.

Diminished humoral and cellular responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Previous studies have demonstrated low rates of seroconversion to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In this national collaboration of 11 cancer centers in the United States, we aimed to further characterize and understand vaccine-induced immune responses, including T-cell responses, and the impact of CLL therapeutics (#NCT04852822). Eligible patients were enrolled in 2 cohorts (1) at the time of initial vaccination and (2) at the time of booster vaccination. The serologic response rates (anti-S) from 210 patients in the initial vaccination cohort and 117 in the booster vaccination cohort were 56% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50-63) and 68% (95% CI, 60-77), respectively. Compared with patients not on therapy, those receiving B-cell-directed therapy were less likely to seroconvert (odds ratio [OR], 0.27; 95% CI, 0.15-0.49). Persistence of response was observed at 6 months; anti-S titers increased with the administration of booster vaccinations. In the initial vaccination cohort, positive correlations were observed between the quantitative serologic response and CD4 T-cell response for the Wuhan variant and, to a lesser degree, for the Omicron variant (Spearman P = 0.45 Wuhan; P = 0.25 Omicron). In the booster vaccination cohort, positive correlations were observed between serologic responses and CD4 T-cell responses for both variants (P = 0.58 Wuhan; P = 0.57 Omicron) and to a lesser degree for CD8 T-cell responses (P = 0.33 Wuhan; P = 0.22 Omicron). Although no deaths from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been reported after booster vaccinations, patients should use caution as newer variants emerge and escape vaccine-induced immunity. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04852822.

Efficacy, safety, and molecular response predictors of oral ixazomib and short-course rituximab in untreated iNHL

Patients with indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) generally require treatment but experience normal survival, emphasizing the need for simpler, safer therapies. Proteasome inhibitors target aberrant signaling pathways within iNHL and have manageable toxicities. We evaluated the oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib as initial monotherapy, and combined with rituximab, for first-line treatment of iNHL. Treatment-naïve patients with iNHL needing therapy received oral ixazomib 4 mg weekly until progressive disease or unacceptable adverse events. A 4-week course of rituximab was added during month 7. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR) during the ixazomib monotherapy window. Correlations included gene expression profiling and response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination. Thirty-three patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) (n = 20), marginal zone lymphoma (n = 7), and other iNHL were treated with a median follow-up of 30.3 months. During the 6-month ixazomib window, the ORR was 24%, including 35% in FL. The best ORR over the entire study period was 52% overall and 65% in FL; complete response was achieved in 33% and 45%, respectively. The median duration of response was 25.8 months (range, 0-49.7), and the 24-month progression-free and overall survival rates were 51% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32-67) and 91% (95% CI, 74-97), respectively. Ixazomib was well tolerated. Baseline downregulation of proteasome genes, PSMB9 (P = .03) and PSMB8 (P = .007), were associated with response. All evaluated patients generated anti-S antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, with a median of 254.9 binding arbitrary unit per mL. Ixazomib demonstrated efficacy alone and with short-course rituximab in untreated iNHL while exhibiting favorable toxicity, convenience, and retention of the B-cell immune response. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02339922.

COVID-19 Vaccination Response and Its Practical Application in Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Patients with chronic lymphocyticleukemia (CLL) typically have innate/adaptive immune system dysregulation, thus the protective effect of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination remains uncertain. This prospective review evaluates vaccination response in these patients, including seropositivity rates by CLL treatment status, type of treatment received, and timing of vaccination. Antibody persistence, predictors of poor vaccine response, and severity of COVID-19 infection in vaccinated patients were also analyzed. Practical advice on the clinical management of patients with CLL is provided. Articles reporting COVID-19 vaccination in patients with CLL, published January 1, 2021-May 1, 2022, were included. Patients with CLL displayed the lowest vaccination responses among hematologic malignancies; however, seropositivity increased with each vaccination. One of the most commonly reported independent risk factors for poor vaccine response was active CLL treatment; others included hypogammaglobulinemia and age >65-70 years. Patients who were treatment-naive, off therapy, in remission, or who had a prior COVID-19 infection displayed the greatest responses. Further data are needed on breakthrough infection rates and a heterologous booster approach in patients with hematologic malignancies. Although vaccine response was poor for patients on active therapy regardless of treatment type, CLL management in the context of COVID-19 should aim to avoid delays in antileukemic treatment, especially with the advent of numerous strategies to mitigate risk of severe COVID-19 such as pre-exposure prophylaxis, and highly effective antivirals and monoclonal antibody therapy upon confirmed infection. Patients with CLL should remain vigilant in retaining standard prevention measures such as masks, social distancing, and hand hygiene.

Immunogenicity and risks associated with impaired immune responses following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and booster in hematologic malignancy patients: an updated meta-analysis

Patients with hematologic malignancies (HM) have demonstrated impaired immune responses following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Factors associated with poor immunogenicity remain largely undetermined. A literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and medRxiv databases to identify studies that reported humoral or cellular immune responses (CIR) following complete SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. The primary aim was to estimate the seroconversion rate (SR) following complete SARS-CoV-2 vaccination across various subtypes of HM diseases and treatments. The secondary aims were to determine the rates of development of neutralizing antibodies (NAb) and CIR following complete vaccination and SR following booster doses. A total of 170 studies were included for qualitative and quantitative analysis of primary and secondary outcomes. A meta-analysis of 150 studies including 20,922 HM patients revealed a pooled SR following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination of 67.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64.8-70.4%; I² = 94%). Meta-regression analysis showed that patients with lymphoid malignancies, but not myeloid malignancies, had lower seroconversion rates than those with solid cancers (R² = 0.52, P < 0.0001). Patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CART), B-cell targeted therapies or JAK inhibitors were associated with poor seroconversion (R² = 0.39, P < 0.0001). The pooled NAb and CIR rates were 52.8% (95% CI; 45.8-59.7%, I² = 87%) and 66.6% (95% CI, 57.1-74.9%; I² = 86%), respectively. Approximately 20.9% (95% CI, 11.4-35.1%, I² = 90%) of HM patients failed to elicit humoral and cellular immunity. Among non-seroconverted patients after primary vaccination, only 40.5% (95% CI, 33.0-48.4%; I² = 87%) mounted seroconversion after the booster. In conclusion, HM patients, especially those with lymphoid malignancies and/or receiving CART, B-cell targeted therapies, or JAK inhibitors, showed poor SR after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. A minority of patients attained seroconversion after booster vaccination. Strategies to improve immune response in these severely immunosuppressed patients are needed.

SARS-CoV-2 humoral responses following booster BNT162b2 vaccination in patients with B-cell malignancies

Patients with B-cell malignancies have suboptimal immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and are a high-risk population for severe COVID19 disease. We evaluated the effect of a third booster BNT162b2 vaccine on the kinetics of anti- SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody (NAbs) titers in patients with B-cell malignancies. Patients with NHL (n = 54) Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (n = 90) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n = 49) enrolled in the ongoing NCT04743388 study and compared against matched healthy controls. All patient groups had significantly lower NAbs compared to controls at all time points. 1 month post the third dose (M1P3D) NAbs increased significantly compared to previous time points (median NAbs 77.9%, p < .05 for all comparisons) in all patients. NAbs ≥ 50% were seen in 59.1% of patients, 34.5% of patients with suboptimal responses post-second dose, elicited a protective NAb titer ≥50%. Active treatment, rituximab, and BTKi treatment were the most important prognostic factors for a poor NAb response at 1MP3D; only 25.8% of patients on active treatment had NAbs ≥ 50%. No significant between-group differences were observed. Patients with B-cell malignancies have inferior humoral responses against SARS-CoV-2 and booster dose enhances the NAb response in a proportion of these patients.

Effects of the BTN162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in humoral and cellular immunity in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), the most common leukemia in the western countries, is characterized by immunosuppression due to disease itself and cytotoxic treatments. Since the beginning of COVID-19 pandemic, patients with CLL appear to be a vulnerable population. In addition, phase III mRNA vaccine trials did not provide information about the efficacy in immunocomprised population. In CLL, the antibody-mediated response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine is impaired. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effects of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination on humoral immune response and on cellular immunity in CLL patients. Humoral immune response to BNT162b2 messenger RNA COVID-19 vaccine was evaluated in 44 CLL patients comprising 20 treatment-naïve, 14 under treatment with ibrutinib and 10 in follow-up after completion of therapy. A positive serological response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination with IgG titers higher than 13 UA/ml was detected in 54.6% of CLL patients with a higher response in patients who obtained remission after treatment. Reduced antibody response was detected in patients under ibrutinib treatment. T-cell response to overlapping pool of peptides representing the spike region was assessed in paired CLL samples collected before and after 1 month from the second dose of COVID-19 vaccine in treatment-naïve and ibrutinib-treated CLL patients using cytokine secretion assay. Both CD3+ CD4+ and CD3+ CD8+ T cells are able to mount a cellular response to spike peptides with secretion of IFNγ and TNFα before and after vaccination in both treatment naïve and ibrutinib-treated patients and this cellular immune response is independent by COVID-19 vaccination. Collectively, T cell response to spike peptides appeared more blunted in CLL patients under treatment with ibrutinib compared to untreated ones. Our study supports the need for optimization of vaccination strategy to achieve an adequate immune response keeping strict preventive measures by CLL patients against COVID-19.

Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Have a Very High Risk of Ineffective Response to the BNT162b2 Vaccine

Patients with CLL have high rates of either severe disease or death from COVID-19 and a low response rate after COVID-19 vaccination has been reported. We conducted a single-center study with the main objective to evaluate the immunogenicity of the BNT1162b2 mRNA vaccines in 42 patients affected by CLL with the assessment of antibody response after the second and the third dose. After the second dose of vaccine, 13 patients (30%) showed an antibody response. The presence of hypogammaglobulinemia and the use of steroids or IVIG were the main factors associated with poor response. After the third dose, 5/27 (18%) patients showed an antibody response while in non-responders to the second dose, only 1 patient (4%) showed an elicitation of the immune response by the third dose, with no statistically significant difference. Our data, despite the small size of our cohort, demonstrate that patients with CLL have a low rate of effective response to the BNT162b2 vaccine. However, the effective role of a subsequent dose is still unclear, highlighting the need for alternative methods of immunization in this particularly fragile group of patients.