Peri-operative and local control outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy vs percutaneous cryoablation for renal masses: comparison after matching on radiological stage and renal score

Thermal Ablation Versus Partial Nephrectomy for cT1 Renal Mass in a Solitary Kidney: A Matched Cohort Comparative Analysis

BACKGROUND

Nephron-sparing approaches are preferred for renal mass in a solitary kidney (RMSK), with partial nephrectomy (PN) generally prioritized. Thermal ablation (TA) also is an option for small renal masses in this setting; however, comparative functional/survival outcomes are not well-defined.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 504 patients (1975-2022) with cT1 RMSK managed with PN (n = 409)/TA (n = 95) with necessary data for analysis was performed. Propensity score was used for matching patients, including age, preoperative glomerular filtration rate (GFR), tumor diameter, R.E.N.A.L. ((R)adius (tumor size as maximal diameter), (E)xophytic/endophytic properties of tumor, (N)earness of tumor deepest portion to collecting system or sinus, (A)nterior (a)/posterior (p) descriptor, and (L)ocation relative to polar lines), and comorbidities. Functional outcomes were compared, and Kaplan-Meier was used to analyze survival.

RESULTS

The matched cohort included 132 patients (TA = 66/PN = 66), with median tumor diameter of 2.4 cm, R.E.N.A.L. of 6, and preoperative GFR of 52 ml/min/1.73 m2. Acute kidney injury occurred in 11%/61% in the TA/PN cohorts, respectively (p < 0.01). After recovery, median GFR preserved was 89%/83% for TA/PN, respectively (p = 0.02), and 5-year dialysis-free survival was 96% in both cohorts. Median follow-up was 53 months. Five-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 62%/86% in the TA/PN cohorts, respectively (p < 0.01). Five-year local recurrence (LR)-free survival was 74%/95% in the TA/PN cohorts, respectively (p < 0.01). Five-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) was 96%/98% in the TA/PN cohorts, respectively (p = 0.7). Local recurrence was observed in nine of 36 (25%) and five of 30 (17%) patients managed with laparoscopic versus percutaneous TA, respectively. For TA with LR (n = 14), nine patients presented with multifocality and/or cT1b tumors. Twelve LR were managed with salvage TA, and seven remained cancer-free, while five developed systemic recurrence, three with concomitant LR.

CONCLUSIONS

Functional outcomes for TA for RMSK were improved compared with PN. Local recurrence was more common after TA and often was associated with the laparoscopic approach, multifocality, and large tumor size. Improved patient selection and greater experience with TA should improve outcomes. Salvage of LR was not always possible. Partial nephrectomy remains the reference standard for RMSK.

Contrast enhancement early after renal malignancy cryoablation: imaging findings associated with benignity

OBJECTIVES

Contrast enhancement by MRI done early after cryoablation for renal malignancies may suggest residual tumor (RT). However, we have observed MRI enhancement within 48 h of cryoablation in patients who had no contrast enhancement 6 weeks later. Our purpose was to identify features of 48-h contrast enhancement in patients without RT.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous cryoablation of renal malignancies in 2013-2020, exhibited cryoablation-zone MRI contrast enhancement 48 h later, and had available 6-week MRI scans. Persistent or growing CE at 6 weeks vs. 48 h was classified as RT. A washout index was calculated for each 48-h MRI, and its performance for predicting RT was assessed by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

RESULTS

We included 60 patients with 72 cryoablation procedures and 83 cryoablation zones exhibiting 48-h contrast enhancement; mean age was 66 ± 17 years. Clear-cell renal cell carcinoma accounted for 95% of tumors. Of the 83 48-h enhancement zones, RT was observed in eight while 75 were benign. The 48-h enhancement was consistently visible at the arterial phase. Washout was significantly associated with RT (p < 0.001) and gradually increasing contrast enhancement with benignity (p < 0.009). A washout index below  - 1.1 predicted RT with 88% sensitivity and 84% specificity.

CONCLUSION

MRI contrast enhancement 48 h after cryoablation of renal malignancies was usually benign. Washout was associated with residual tumor, with a washout index value below  - 1.1 exhibiting good performance in predicting residual tumor. These findings may help to guide decisions about repeat cryoablation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Magnetic resonance imaging contrast enhancement 48 h after cryoablation of renal malignancies rarely indicates residual tumor, which is characterized by washout with a washout index lower than  - 1.1.

KEY POINTS

• Contrast enhancement at the arterial phase of magnetic resonance imaging done 48 h after cryoablation of a renal malignancy is usually benign. • Residual tumor manifesting as contrast enhancement at the arterial phase is characterized by subsequent marked washout. • A washout index below  - 1.1 has 88% sensitivity and 84% specificity for residual tumor.

Intraoperative MRI-derived volumetric ablation margins and initial correlation with local outcome after MRI-guided cryoablation of renal tumors

PURPOSE

To assess volumetric ablation margins derived from intraoperative pre- and post-ablation MRI after magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided percutaneous cryoablation of renal tumors and explore its correlation with local treatment success.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was performed on 30 patients (mean age 69y) who underwent percutaneous MRI-guided cryoablation between May 2014 and May 2020 for 32 renal tumors (size: 1.6-5.1 cm). Tumor and ice-ball volumes were segmented on intraprocedural pre- and post-ablation MR images using Software Assistant for Interventional Radiology (SAFIR) software. After MRI-MRI co-registration, the software automatically quantified the minimal treatment margin (MTM),defined as the smallest 3D distance between the tumor and ice-ball surface. Local tumor progression (LTP) after cryoablation was assessed on follow-up imaging.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 16 months (range: 1-58). Local control after cryoablation was achieved in 26 cases (81%) while LTP occurred in 6 (19%). The intended MTM of ≥5 mm was achieved in 3/32 (9%) cases. Median MTM was significantly smaller for cases with (- 7 mm; IQR:-10 to - 5) vs. without LTP (3 mm; IQR:2 to 4) (P < .001). All cases of LTP had a negative MTM. All negative treatment margins occurred in tumors > 3 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

Determination of volumetric ablation margins from intraoperative MRI was feasible and may be useful in predicting local outcome after MRI-guided renal cryoablation. In our preliminary data, an intraoperative MRI-derived minimal margin extending at least 1 mm beyond the MRI-visible tumor led to local control and this was more difficult to achieve in tumors > 3 cm. Ultimately, online margin analysis may be a valuable tool to intraoperatively assess therapy success, but larger prospective studies are needed to establish a reliable threshold for clinical use.

Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy and percutaneous cryoablation for cT1a renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

There is growing evidence that partial nephrectomy (PN) and percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) yield comparable outcomes for patients with cT1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC), although the cost-effectiveness of both treatments still needs to be assessed.

PURPOSE

To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of PN and PCA for patients with cT1a RCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A decision analysis was created over a 5-year span from a healthcare payer's perspective computing expected costs and outcomes of PN and PCA in terms of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness (ICER). After each treatment, the following states were modelled using data from the recent literature: procedural complications, no evidence of disease (NED), local recurrence, metastases, and death from RCC- or non-RCC-related causes. Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

PCA and PN yielded health benefits of 3.68 QALY and 3.67 QALY. Overall expected costs were $20,491 and $26,478 for PCA and PN. On probabilistic sensitivity analysis, PCA was more cost-effective than PN in 84.78% of Monte Carlo simulations. PCA was more cost-effective until its complication risk was at least 38% higher than PN. PCA was more cost-effective than PN when (i) PCAs annual local recurrence risk was < 3.5% higher than that of PN in absolute values; (ii) PCAs annual metastatic risk was < 1.0% higher than that of PN; or (iii) PCAs annual cancer-specific mortality risk < 0.65% higher than that of PN. PCA remained cost-effective until its procedural cost is above $13,875.

CONCLUSION

PCA appears to be more cost-effective than PN for the treatment of cT1a RCC, although the currently available evidence is of limited quality. PCA may be the better treatment strategy in the majority of scenarios varying procedural complications, recurrence, metastatic risk, and RCC-mortality in clinically plausible ranges.

KEY POINTS

• For patients with cT1a RCCs, PCA yields a comparable health benefit at lower costs compared to PN, making PCA the dominant and therefore more cost-effective treatment strategy over PN. • PCA was more cost-effective than PN when (i) PCAs annual local recurrence risk was < 3.5% higher than PN in absolute values; (ii) PCAs annual metastatic risk was < 1.0% higher than PN; or (iii) PCAs annual cancer-specific mortality risk < 0.65% higher than PN. • PCA is more cost-effective than PN for the treatment of cT1a RCC, and it remained so in the majority of scenarios varying procedural complications, recurrence, metastatic risk, and RCC mortality.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes between Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy and Cryoablation in Elderly Patients with Renal Cancer

Advances in imaging technologies have increased the opportunities for treating small-diameter renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) in the elderly. This retrospective study based on real-world clinical practice compared perioperative complications, preoperative and postoperative renal function, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival in elderly patients with RCC who had undergone robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) or percutaneous cryoablation (PCA). A total of 99 patients (aged ≥70 years), including 50 and 49 patients in the RAPN and PCA groups, respectively, were analyzed. In the entire cohort, Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3 complications occurred in only one patient who had undergone RAPN. Renal function was significantly lower in the postoperative period than in the preoperative period in both the RAPN and PCA groups. The recurrence-free survival and overall survival rates were worse in the PCA group than in the RAPN group, albeit not significantly. RAPN was considered a safe and effective method for treating RCCs in elderly patients. Moreover, although the recurrence rate was slightly higher in the PCA group than in the RAPN group, PCA was deemed to be a safe alternative, especially for treating patients in whom general anesthesia poses a high risk.

Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Mid-Term Oncologic Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Background: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is used more and more in present days as a therapy option for surgical treatment of cT1 renal masses. Current guidelines equally recommend open (OPN), laparoscopic (LPN), or robotic partial nephrectomy (PN). The aim of this review was to analyze the most representative RAPN series in terms of reported oncological outcomes. (2) Methods: A systematic search of Webofscience, PUBMED, Clinicaltrials.gov was performed on 1 August 2022. Studies were considered eligible if they: included patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) stage T1, were prospective, used randomized clinical trials (RCT) or retrospective studies, had patients undergo RAPN with a minimum follow-up of 48 months. (3) Results: Reported positive surgical margin rates were from 0 to 10.5%. Local recurrence occurred in up to 3.6% of patients. Distant metastases were reported in up to 6.4% of patients. 5-year cancer free survival (CFS) estimates rates ranged from 86.4% to 98.4%. 5-year cancer specific survival (CSS) estimates rates ranged from 90.1% to 100%, and 5-year overall survival (OS) estimates rated ranged from 82.6% to 97.9%. (4) Conclusions: Data coming from retrospective and prospective series shows very good oncologic outcomes after RAPN. Up to now, 10-year survival outcomes were not reported. Taken together, RAPN deliver similar oncologic performance to OPN and LPN.

Percutaneous ablation or minimally invasive partial nephrectomy for cT1a renal masses? A propensity score-matched analysis

OBJECTIVE

Local tumor ablation to treat small renal mass is increasing. The aim of the present study was to compare oncologic outcomes among patients with T1 renal mass treated with partial nephrectomy and local tumor ablation.

METHODS

To reduce the inherent differences between patients undergoing laparoscopic or robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (n = 405) and local tumor ablation (n = 137), we used a 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis. Local tumor ablation consisted of radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation. Disease-free survival, overall survival and other causes mortality-free survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable logistic regression and competing-risk regression models were used to identify predictors of complications, recurrence and other causes mortality, respectively.

RESULTS

Partial nephrectomy had higher disease-free survival estimates, as compared with local tumor ablation (92.8% vs 80.4% at 5 years, P = 0.02), with no significant difference between radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation (P = 0.9). Ablation showed comparable overall survival estimates to partial nephrectomy (91% vs 95.8% at 5 years, P = 0.6). The 5-year recurrence rates were 7.9% versus 23.8% for patients aged ≤70 years, and 2.5% versus 11.9% for patients aged >70 years treated with partial nephrectomy and ablation, respectively; the 5-year other causes mortality rates were 0% and 2.2% for patients treated with partial nephrectomy and ablation aged ≤70 years, and 3% versus 10.9% for patients aged >70 years treated with partial nephrectomy and ablation, respectively. At multivariable analysis, ablation was associated with fewer complications (odds ratio 0.41; P = 0.01). At competing risks analysis, age (hazard ratio 0.96) and ablation (hazard ratio 4.56) were independent predictors of disease recurrence (all P ≤ 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Local tumor ablation showed a higher risk of recurrence and lower risk of complications compared with partial nephrectomy, with comparable overall survival rates.

Comparison of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy with Laparoscopic Cryoablation in the Treatment of Localised Renal Tumours: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes

Preserving renal function and controlling oncological outcomes are pertinent when managing renal neoplasms. Cryoablation is the recommended treatment only for clinical T1a stage renal tumour. Here, we compared the outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RaPN) and laparoscopic cryoablation (LCA) in the treatment of patients with localised T1-T2 renal tumours. Overall, 86 patients who received RaPN and 78 patients underwent LCA were included in this study. The intraoperative, postoperative, and oncological outcomes in the LCA group were non-inferior to the RaPN group. Moreover, LCA demonstrated shorter operative time (267.45 ± 104.53 min vs. 138.56 ± 45.28 min, p < 0.001), lower blood loss (300.56 ± 360.73 mL vs. 30.73 ± 50.31 mL, p < 0.001), and slight renal function deterioration because of the reduced invasiveness, without compromising on the oncological outcomes.

Percutaneous tumor ablation versus partial nephrectomy for small renal mass: the impact of histologic variant and tumor size

BACKGROUND

The aim, of this study was to investigate recurrence rates in patients with T1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) undergone partial nephrectomy (PN), radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or cryoablation (Cryo).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated data from 665 (81.4%), 68 (8.3%) and 83 (10.3%) patients who underwent PN, RFA and Cryo, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves depict recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates in the overall population and after stratifying according to tumor's histology (namely, clear cell RCC and non-clear RCC) and size (namely <2 cm and 2-4 cm). Multivariable Cox regression model was used to identify predictors of recurrence. Cumulative-incidence plots evaluated disease recurrence and other causes of mortality (OCM).

RESULTS

Patients referred to PN experienced higher RFS rate compared to those treated with RFA and Cryo at 60-month in the overall population (96.4% vs. 79.4% vs. 87.8%), in patients with clear cell RCC (93.3% vs. 75% vs. 80.4%) and in those with tumor of 2-4 cm (97.3% vs. 78% and 84.4%; all P≤0.01). In patients with non-clear cell RCC and with tumor <2cm, PN showed higher RFS rate at 60-month as compared to RFA (97.9% vs. 84.4% and 95.1% vs. 78.1%, respectively: all P≤0.02). At multi-variate analysis, ablative techniques (RFA [HR=4.03] and Cryo [HR=3.86]) were independent predictors of recurrence (all P<0.03). At competing risks analysis, recurrence rate and OCM were 7.3% and 1.3% vs. 25% and 7.2% vs. 19.9% and 19.9% for PN, RFA and Cryo, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

PN and Cryo showed similar RFS rates in patients with non-clear cell RCC and with renal mass <2cm.

Robotic-assisted Partial Nephrectomy for "Very Small" (<2 cm) Renal Mass: Results of a Multicenter Contemporary Cohort

BACKGROUND

Patient with "very small" (<2 cm) renal mass can be offered active surveillance, thermal ablation, or partial nephrectomy. The management strategy will consider patient preferences and prioritize potential harms associated with each of these options. To date, outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in patients with "very small" renal masses have not been reported.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the outcomes of RAPN among patients with "very small" renal masses.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This was a retrospective analysis of a multi-institutional database including RAPN cases performed at eight high-volume US and European centers between 2009 and 2019. Patients were stratified into two groups according to clinical tumor size: <2 cm ("very small" renal mass, study group) and 2-4 cm (control group).

INTERVENTION

RAPN for renal masses.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Baseline characteristics and intraoperative, pathological, and postoperative data were compared between the study and the control group. A "trifecta" was used as surrogate of "surgical quality."

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Overall, a total of 1019 patients were included in the analysis. Of these, 352 had a renal mass of <2 cm (34.5%) and 667 (65.5%) had a renal mass of 2-4 cm. At baseline, the study group presented a lower rate of chronic kidney disease ≥stage III (p < 0.001), a lower RENAL score (p = 0.001), and lower rates of hilar (p = 0.04) and endophytic (p = 0.02) masses. Warm ischemia time was shorter for the study group (median 14 vs 18 min, p < 0.001), which also showed a lower rate of overall postoperative complications (9.6% vs 14.7%, p < 0.001) and no major complications. In terms of oncological outcomes, three and ten patients developed a local recurrence in the study and the control group, respectively (p = 0.1). In the study group, higher estimated glomerular filtration rates were found at discharge (p = 0.001) and at the last follow-up (p = 0.007), which showed a "trifecta" achievement of 90.6%. The retrospective design may limit the generalizability of the findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Whenever an active treatment is indicated or warranted, RAPN represents a minimally invasive management option for "very small" renal masses, as it carries minimal risk of complications and has minimal impact on renal function. While both active surveillance and kidney ablation remain valid management options in these cases, RAPN can be offered and discussed with patients as it provides excellent outcomes with low morbidity.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this report, we observed that robot-assisted partial nephrectomy represents a true minimally invasive active treatment for "very small" renal masses (<2 cm), as it carries minimal risk of complications and has minimal impact on renal function.

Safety and effectiveness of percutaneous renal cryoablation with conscious sedation

OBJECTIVE

To investigate complications and treatment failure rates of percutaneous renal cryoablation (PRC) for small renal masses under local anaesthesia and conscious sedation (LACS), to assess the safety and effectiveness of this approach, as PRC is typically performed under general anaesthesia (GA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed PRC under LACS from 2003 to 2017. We analysed perioperative parameters between patients who successfully underwent PRC under LACS and patients with post-procedural complications or treatment failure (renal mass enhancement after successful intraoperative tumour ablation). Two-sided non-parametric and Fisher's exact tests were performed to compare uncomplicated or disease-free PRC with the complication or treatment failure group, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 100 PRCs under LACS were performed during the study period. Of these patients, six patients had at least one postoperative complication (6%), and treatment failure was diagnosed in nine patients (9%) after PRC [mean (SD) follow-up of 42.7 (26.6) months]. The procedural failure rate was 1%. No ablations were converted to GA. The mean tumour size was smaller in patients who had no complications during PRC compared to those who did, at a mean (SD) of 2.2 (0.6) cm vs 3.0 (1.0) cm (P = 0.039). The use of more intraoperative probes during the PRC was also associated with complications, at a mean (SD) 3.0 (1.4) vs 1.8 (0.8) (P = 0.021).

CONCLUSIONS

PRC under LACS is an effective and safe procedural approach for managing small renal masses with low complication, treatment failure, and procedural failure rates. Larger renal masses and intraoperative use of multiple probes is associated with an increased risk of PRC complications.

ABBREVIATIONS

BMI: body mass index; CCI: Charlson Comorbidity Index; GA: general anaesthesia; LACS: local anaesthesia and conscious sedation; PRC: percutaneous renal cryoablation; R.E.N.A.L.: Radius, Exophytic/Endophytic, Nearness, Anterior/Posterior, Location.

Percutaneous Image-guided Thermal Ablation for Renal Cell Carcinoma

Nephrectomy is the gold standard for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, some patients are not suitable candidates for nephrectomy because of high surgical risk, reduced renal function, or the presence of multiple renal tumors. Percutaneous image-guided thermal ablation, including cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation, is a minimally invasive and highly effective treatment and can be used to treat RCC in patients who are not good candidates for surgery. This article will review percutaneous image-guided thermal ablation for RCC, covering treatment indications, ablation modalities and techniques, oncologic outcomes, and possible complications. In addition, the characteristics of each ablation modality and its comparison with nephrectomy are also presented.

Renal cell carcinoma in a horseshoe kidney treated with robot-assisted partial nephrectomy

Horseshoe kidney is one of the most common congenital renal fusion anomalies and the incidence of renal cell carcinoma in horseshoe kidney is predicted to be approximately 5.2/100000 individuals. Because horseshoe kidney merges malformations and vascular changes, open surgery is the standard for treatment. There are no reports of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for renal cell carcinoma in horseshoe kidney. We describe for the first time the safety and the utility of RAPN in a horseshoe kidney with renal cell carcinoma.

Cryoablation versus Partial Nephrectomy for Clinical Stage T1 Renal Masses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Cryoablation has been considered as the most efficacious ablative alternative to partial nephrectomy (PN) for selected patients. Our objective is to assess the existing evidence relating to the safety and efficacy of cryoablation compared with PN for clinical T1 renal masses.

Materials and Methods: A comprehensive search of PMC, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was conducted to identify studies containing comparison of cryoablation and PN. By utilizing those included studies, a systematic review and cumulative meta-analyses were performed to assess the safety and efficacy between cryoablation and PN for T1 renal masses.

Results: 17 retrospective studies providing available data were included in our study. Significant differences were found about all oncological variables including all-cause death, cancer-specific death, metastasis and local-recurrence (p < 0.001, p = 0.03, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively) between the PN group and the cryoablation group. The mean difference between two groups for percent estimated glomerular filtration rate decrease and creatinine increase was -4.84 and 0.15 respectively (p < 0.001 and p = 0.006, respectively). The incidences of overall and postoperative complications in the PN group were significantly higher than that in the cryoablation group (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively), but the result about intraoperative complications didn't show a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.53).

Conclusions: Comparing with PN, cryoablation for clinical T1 renal tumors is associated with poorer oncological outcomes, but the existing disadvantages are accompanied by lower rate of overall and postoperative complications and superior renal functional preservation. For patients with imperative indications for nephron-sparing surgery who can't risk more invasive PN, cryoablation could be an attractive option. Owing to the inherent limitations of eligible studies, conclusions drawn from our meta-analyses should be interpreted cautiously and be confirmed further with well-designed randomized controlled trials with extensive follow-up length.