Flexible fibre optic vs digital ureteroscopy and enhanced vs unenhanced imaging for diagnosis and treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC): results from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourology Society (CROES)-UTUC registry

Influence of tumour location on the survival outcomes of upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with radical nephroureterectomy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of tumour location on the survival outcomes of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU).

METHOD

Patients with ureteral urothelial carcinoma (UUC) or renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma (RPUC) of the Clinical Research Office of the Endourology Society (CROES)-UTUC registry were analyzed. Study outcomes included overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), intravesical recurrence-free survival (IRFS), and progression-free survival (PFS), which were compared using Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the differences in tumour features between the two groups.

RESULT

The UUC and RPUC groups consisted of 309 (41.9%) and 429 (58.1%) patients, respectively. RPUC group had larger tumour size (77.9% ≥ 2 cm vs 67.0% in UUC, p < 0.01), and more T3/T4 tumours (36.4% vs. 22. 0%, p < 0.01). The UUC group exhibited worse PFS compared to the RPUC group ( p = 0.029 for the initial analysis and p = 0.013 after PSM). However, there were no significant differences in OS (p = 0.088 before PSM and p = 0.255 after PSM), CSS (p = 0.106 before PSM and p = 0.101 after PSM), or IRFS (p = 0.112 before PSM and p = 0.28 after PSM) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients with ureteral urothelial carcinoma exhibited worse PFS compared to those with renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma. However, no significant differences were observed in OS, CSS, or IRFS between the two tumour locations. UTUC patients should be counselled about their individualized prognosis accordingly.

REGISTRATION

NCT02281188.

Oncologic Outcomes of Endoscopic Management of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis from the EAU-YAU Urothelial Working Group

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Data about the mid- and long-term oncologic outcomes of endoscopic kidney-sparing surgery (eKSS) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) are scarce. Therefore, we aimed to summarize the current evidence on the oncologic outcomes of eKSS for UTUC.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted to identify reports published until May 2024. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines were followed to identify eligible studies. The outcomes were the following: recurrence-free (RFS), intravesical recurrence-free (IV-RFS), progression-free (PFS), cancer-specific (CSS), and overall (OS) survival.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

We found 56 studies (n = 52 retrospective) that met our inclusion criteria (n = 2862 patients). The 1-, 2-, 5-, and 10-yr OS rates were 96%, 87%, 80%, and 42%, respectively. The 1-, 2-, 5-, and 10-yr CSS rates were 97%, 89%, 82%, and 69%, respectively. RFS rates at 1, 2, and 5 yr were 69%, 55%, and 45%, respectively. IV-RFS rates at 1, 2, and 5 yr were 80%, 65%, and 64%, respectively. PFS rates at 2 and 5 yr were 75% and 69%, respectively. In low-grade UTUC, OS rates at 2 and 5 yr were 93% and 77%, respectively. The 2- and 5-yr CSS rates were 98% and 88%, respectively. At 2 yr, RFS, IV-RFS, and PFS were 52%, 54%, and 94%, respectively. For high-grade UTUC, only three studies reported data on 2-yr RFS, which was 34%. The main limitation is the heterogeneity found across the studies.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Local recurrence, bladder recurrence, and progression of UTUC occur mainly within 2 yr after eKSS. After 5-yr follow-up, OS and CSS drop, while the risk of local recurrence is non-negligible.

Cumulative morbidity of ureteroscopy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To assess complications after ureteroscopy (URS) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) management and to assess its postoperative cumulative morbidity burden using the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Single center retrospective study including patients submitted to URS for UTUC suspicion. URSs were both diagnostic and operative. Postoperative complications were recorded according to the EAU Guidelines and graded according to Clavien-Dindo Classification (CDC). The cumulative postoperative morbidity burden developed by patients experiencing multiple events was assessed using the CCI. Multivariable logistic regression (MLR) analyses identified factors independently associated with the development of any grade and major postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Overall, 360 patients with UTUC suspicion were included with a total of 575 URSs performed. The cumulative number of all postoperative complications recorded was 111. In 86 (15%) procedures, patients experienced at least one postoperative complication, while 25 (4.3%) experienced more than one complication. Of these, 16 (14%) were severe (CDC ≥ IIIa). The most frequent type of complications were urinary (34%), bleeding (30%) and infectious (30%). The higher the CDC grade, the higher the median CCI, with a statistically significant increase in median CCI from CDC II to major complications. Patients who experienced intraoperative complications were at higher risk of developing any grade and major postoperative complications at MLR.

CONCLUSIONS

Complications after ureteroscopy for UTUC are relatively uncommon events. Patients who experience intraoperative complications are at higher risk of developing postoperative complications. The comprehensive complication index appeared more representative of the cumulative postoperative morbidity rather than the Clavien-Dindo classification.

Imaging for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: update of the evidence and a glimpse into the future

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare malignancy posing significant diagnostic and management challenges. This review provides an overview of the evidence supporting various imaging modalities and offers insights into future innovations in UTUC imaging.

RECENT FINDINGS

With the growing use of advancements in computed tomography (CT) technologies for both staging and follow-up of UTUC patients, continuous innovations aim to enhance performance and minimize the risk of excessive exposure to ionizing radiation and iodinated contrast medium. In patients unable to undergo CT, magnetic resonance imaging serves as an alternative imaging modality, though its sensitivity is lower than CT. Positron emission tomography, particularly with innovative radiotracers and theranostics, has the potential to significantly advance precision medicine in UTUC. Endoscopic imaging techniques including advanced modalities seem to be promising in improved visualization and diagnostic accuracy, however, evidence remains scarce. Radiomics and radiogenomics present emerging tools for noninvasive tumor characterization and prognosis.

SUMMARY

The landscape of imaging for UTUC is rapidly evolving, with significant advancements across various modalities promising improved diagnostic accuracy, patient outcomes, and safety.

Consultation on UTUC II Stockholm 2022: diagnostics, prognostication, and follow-up-where are we today?

PURPOSE

To summarise the current knowledge regarding diagnostics, prognostication and follow-up in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).

METHODS

A scoping review combined with expert opinion was applied to provide an overview of the current research field. Based on the published literature and the experts' own experience and opinions, consensus was reached through presentations and discussions at the meeting Consultation on UTUC II in Stockholm 2022.

RESULTS

The strongest prognostic factors in UTUC are tumour grade and stage. They are correlated, and grade is used for indirect staging. The diagnostic examinations should include multiphase computed tomography urography (CTU) with corticomedullary phase, and urethrocystoscopy with cytology. If there is no clear diagnosis for clinical decision-making, ureterorenoscopy (URS) with focal cytology and biopsies should be performed. Both WHO classification systems (1973/1999 and 2004/2016) should be used. Novel biomarker tests are not yet widespread nor recommended for the detection of UTUC. Long-term, regular follow-up, including URS in patients who have had organ-sparing treatment, is important to check for tumour recurrences, intravesical recurrences, metastases and progression of the tumour.

CONCLUSION

Proper diagnostics with correct grading of UTUC are necessary for appropriate treatment decisions. The diagnostics should include CTU with corticomedullary phase, urine or bladder cytology, URS with focal barbotage cytology, and biopsies when needed for proper diagnosis and risk stratification. Regular, long-term follow-ups are fundamental, due to the high rate of recurrence and risk of progression.

Novel laser therapies and new technologies in the endoscopic management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a narrative review

Background and Objective

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare disease. The gold standard treatment is radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Endoscopic management of UTUC has emerged as an alternative therapy that aims to preserve kidney function while providing effective oncologic control. Over the years, this has become an increasingly important alternative to RNU for treating UTUC in patients with localized disease. Advancements in lasers and endoscopic technology have continued to expand the applications of endoscopic nephron-sparing treatment. This review aims to provide an overview of the available lasers and ureteroscopic technologies used in treating UTUC with a focus on their clinical applications and outcomes.

Methods

A comprehensive literature review was completed using PubMed to create this narrative mini review. Publications from peer-reviewed journals written in English between 1987 to 2022 were evaluated by the authors for inclusion.

Key Content and Findings

Improvements in ureteroscopic technology have led to improved visualization and tumor detection. Laser ablation using different laser energies including the holmium/yttrium-aluminum-garnet, neodymium/YAG, and thulium/YAG has demonstrated promising oncologic outcomes. However, accurate staging and risk-stratification remain limitations to the role of laser ablation for the treatment of UTUC. This review also highlights appropriate patient selection as a critical component of successful endoscopic management.

Conclusions

The continued evolution of endoscopic management will rely on the development of new technologies to improve risk stratification and oncologic outcomes. Overall, this review provides insights into the available laser therapies and ureteroscopic technologies for the endoscopic management of UTUC.

Learning from the past and present to change the future: Endoscopic management of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma

Current guidelines recommend endoscopic management (EM) for patients with low-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma, as well as those with an imperative indication. However, regardless of the tumor risk, radical nephroureterectomy is still mainly performed worldwide despite the benefits of EM, such as renal function maintenance, no hemodialysis requirement, and treatment cost reduction. This might be explained by the association of EM with a high risk of local recurrence and progression. Furthermore, the need for rigorous patient selection and close surveillance following EM may be relevant. Nevertheless, recent developments in diagnostic modalities, pathological evaluation, surgical devices and techniques, and intracavitary regimens have been reported, which may contribute to improved risk stratification and treatments with superior oncological outcomes. In this review, considering recent advances in endourology and oncology, we propose novel treatment strategies for optimal EM.

The utility of clinical registries for guiding clinical practice in upper tract urothelial cancer: a narrative review

Background and Objective

Upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) lacks high-quality evidence to appraise current patterns of presentation, diagnosis, treatment and outcomes as a result of disease rarity and patient heterogeneity. Registries may overcome many of the challenges making clinical trials challenging in UTUC and provide answers to many of the clinical questions that afflict UTUC management. In this narrative review we aim to summarise the design of registries that have contributed to the UTUC literature, discuss their strengths and limitations and the future directions of registries in UTUC.

Methods

Two independent reviewers conducted a search of the OVID MEDLINE database from July 2002-July 2022. Included articles were required to be published in peer reviewed journals and use registry-based methodology to report on UTUC. Search was limited by MeSH and key words and was limited to the English language.

Key Content and Findings

One hundred and forty-four articles were identified and included as reporting on UTUC from a registry-based methodology. Articles utilising registry-based data have substantially increased over the study period with the majority of articles arising from large generalised cancer databases in North America. There has been an increase in UTUC-specific registries in the previous five years that have offered the most granular, complete analysis and these will continue to report in the coming years. The majority of published data assessed epidemiological factors and compared outcomes of treatment modalities with a small proportion of articles focusing on prognostic nomograms and quality of life. Larger cancer registries that contribute the majority of the published analysis are likely subject to significant selection bias when comparing cohorts for treatment analysis and the need for prospective UTUC specific registries is apparent. Future directions include the potential for registry-based randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and clinical quality registries (CQR) that have the ability to change practice and improve care.

Conclusions

The utilisation of registry-based methodology for analysis in UTUC has increased substantially over the last 20 years. In addition to the utilisation of large cancer registries, the creation of UTUC specific registries is likely to contribute the most granular, translatable data in diagnosis and management.

Breakage Costs in Flexible Ureteroscopy: Digital vs. Fiberoptic Modalities

OBJECTIVE

To compare the maintenance costs of digital flexible ureteroscopes (DFU) versus fiberoptic flexible ureteroscopes (FFU) to understand the long-term financial impact associated with breakage in a flexible ureteroscopy (f-URS) program.

METHODS

Data for breakage of FFU and DFU at an academic institution from 2019 to 2021 were obtained from our vendor (Karl Storz) and analyzed by month. Correlation test was used to evaluate significant differences in number of procedures, number of breakage events, breakage rates, and repair cost per month. Cumulative analyses were utilized to examine the number of procedures before failure (time to failure - TTF) and repair costs per procedure (RCpP).

RESULTS

We performed a total of 2,154 f-URS, including 1,355 with FFU and 799 with DFU (P<.001). Although we found a higher number of breakage events in FFU (n=124) than DFU (n=73) (P<.001), the overall breakage rate was similar, 9.9% vs. 8.8%, respectively (P=0.86). On cumulative analysis, both modalities reached the same TTF plateau (11 cases) after 18 months. After 400 cases, the RCpP for DFU was 1.25 times higher than for FFU (P=0.04).

CONCLUSION

Overall, we found no difference in overall scope breakage rates between DFU and FFU. Although there was no difference in TTF over time, at the beginning DFU displayed considerable higher durability, leading to lower RCpP. Furthermore, DFU's endurance leveled off to FFU over time, resulting in higher RCpP after 400 cases. This finding may be explained by the presence of renewed scopes after repair.

The role of endoscopic management and adjuvant topical therapy for upper tract urothelial cancer

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) has traditionally been managed with radical nephroureterectomy, and while this approach remains the gold standard for high-risk disease, endoscopic, kidney-sparing management has increasingly been adopted for low-risk disease as it preserves kidney function without compromising oncologic outcomes. Ureteroscopy and percutaneous renal access not only provide diagnoses by tumor visualization and biopsy, but also enable treatment with electrocautery or laser ablation. Several modalities exist for laser ablative treatments including thulium:YAG, neodymium:YAG, holmium:YAG, and combinations of the preceding. Furthermore, due to high recurrence rates after endoscopic management, adjuvant intracavitary instillation of various agents such as mitomycin C and bacillus Calmette-Guerin have been used given benefits seen in non-muscle invasive urothelial bladder cancer. Other formulations also being studied include gemcitabine, anthracyclines, and immunotherapies. More recently, Jelmyto, a mitomycin reverse thermal gel, has been developed to allow for adequate drug delivery time and potency since urine flow could otherwise dilute and washout topical therapy. In this article, the authors review techniques, indications, best practices, and areas of current investigation in endoscopic management and adjuvant topical therapy for UTUC.