Childhood supratentorial ependymomas with YAP1-MAMLD1 fusion: an entity with characteristic clinical, radiological, cytogenetic and histopathological features

The Molecular Basis of Pediatric Brain Tumors: A Review with Clinical Implications

Central nervous system (CNS) tumors are the most common solid malignancy in the pediatric population. These lesions are the result of the aberrant cell signaling step proteins, which normally regulate cell proliferation. Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways and tyrosine kinase receptors are involved in tumorigenesis of low-grade gliomas. High-grade gliomas may carry similar mutations, but loss of epigenetic control is the dominant molecular event; it can occur either due to histone mutations or inappropriate binding or unbinding of DNA on histones. Therefore, despite the absence of genetic alteration in the classic oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes, uncontrolled transcription results in tumorigenesis. Isocitric dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations do not predominate compared to their adult counterpart. Embryonic tumors include medulloblastomas, which bear mutations of transcription-regulating pathways, such as wingless-related integration sites or sonic hedgehog pathways. They may also relate to high expression of Myc family genes. Atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors harbor alterations of molecules that contribute to ATP hydrolysis of chromatin. Embryonic tumors with multilayered rosettes are associated with microRNA mutations and impaired translation. Ependymomas exhibit great variability. As far as supratentorial lesions are concerned, the major events are mutations either of NFkB or Hippo pathways. Posterior fossa tumors are further divided into two types with different prognoses. Type A group is associated with mutations of DNA damage repair molecules. Lastly, germ cell tumors are a heterogeneous group. Among them, germinomas manifest KIT receptor mutations, a subgroup of the tyrosine kinase receptor family.

Advances in molecular prognostication and treatments in ependymoma

Ependymoma is the third most common brain tumour of childhood and historically has posed a major challenge to both pediatric and adult neuro-oncologists. Ependymoma can occur anywhere in the central nervous system throughout the entire age spectrum. Treatment options have been limited to surgery and radiation, and outcomes have been widely disparate across studies. Indeed, these disparate outcomes have rendered it extraordinarily difficult to compare studies and to truly understand which patients are low and high-risk. Over the past two decades there have been tremendous advances in our understanding of the biology of ependymoma, which have changed risk stratification dramatically. Indeed, it is now well accepted that ependymoma comprises multiple distinct entities, whereby each compartment (supratentorial, posterior fossa, spinal) are distinct, and within each compartment there exist unique groups. The driver events, demographics and response to treatment vary widely across these groups and allow for a better classification of thee disease. Herein, we review the advances in the molecular stratification of ependymoma including how an improved classification and risk stratification allows for more precise therapies.

Distinct relapse pattern across molecular ependymoma types

BACKGROUND

Ependymoma (EPN) is not a uniform disease but represents different disease types with biological and clinical heterogeneity. However, the pattern of when and where different types of EPN relapse is not yet comprehensively described.

METHODS

We assembled 269 relapsed intracranial EPN from pediatric (n = 233) and adult (n = 36) patients from European and Northern American cohorts and correlated DNA methylation patterns and copy-number alterations with clinical information.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised the following molecular EPN types: PF-EPN-A (n = 177), ST-EPN-ZFTA (n = 45), PF-EPN-B (n = 31), PF-EPN-SE (n = 12), and ST-EPN-YAP (n = 4). First relapses of PF-EPN-B (PF: posterior-fossa) and PF-EPN-SE (SE: subependymoma) occurred later than of PF-EPN-A, ST-EPN-YAP (ST: supratentorial), or ST-EPN-ZFTA (median time to relapse: 4.3 and 6.0 years vs. 1.9/1.0/2.4 years; P < .01). Metastatic or combined recurrences in PF-EPN-B and -A more often involved the spinal cord than in ST-EPN-ZFTA (72.7% and 40.0 vs. 12.5%; P < .01). No distant relapses were observed in ST-EPN-YAP (n = 4) or PF-EPN-SE (n = 12). Post-relapse survival (PRS) was poor for PF-EPN-A and ST-EPN-ZFTA (5-year PRS: 44.5% ± 4.4%/47.8% ± 9.1%), whereas PF-EPN-B and PF-EPN-SE displayed a 5-year PRS of 89.5% ± 7.1%/90.0% ± 9.5% (P = .03). However, 10-year PRS for PF-EPN-B dropped to 45.8% ± 17.3%. Neither between the radiation field and relapse pattern nor between the radiation field and spinal involvement at relapse an impact was identified. Notably, all patients with relapsed ST-EPN-YAP did not receive upfront radiotherapy but were successfully salvaged using irradiation at relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

Relapse patterns of specific EPN types are different. Future clinical trials, treatment adaptions, duration of surveillance, and diagnostics should be planned to incorporate entity-specific relapse information.

Cortically Based Brain Tumors in Children: A Decision-Tree Approach in the Radiology Reading Room

Cortically based brain tumors in children constitute a unique set of tumors with variably aggressive biologic behavior. Because radiologists play an integral role on the multidisciplinary medical team, a clinically useful and easy-to-follow flow chart for the differential diagnoses of these complex brain tumors is essential. This proposed algorithm tree provides the latest insights into the typical imaging characteristics and epidemiologic data that differentiate the tumor entities, taking into perspective the 2021 World Health Organization's classification and highlighting classic as well as newly identified pathologic subtypes by using current molecular understanding.

Biglycan-driven risk stratification in ZFTA-RELA fusion supratentorial ependymomas through transcriptome profiling

Recent genomic studies have allowed the subdivision of intracranial ependymomas into molecularly distinct groups with highly specific clinical features and outcomes. The majority of supratentorial ependymomas (ST-EPN) harbor ZFTA-RELA fusions which were designated, in general, as an intermediate risk tumor variant. However, molecular prognosticators within ST-EPN ZFTA-RELA have not been determined yet. Here, we performed methylation-based DNA profiling and transcriptome RNA sequencing analysis of 80 ST-EPN ZFTA-RELA investigating the clinical significance of various molecular patterns. The principal types of ZFTA-RELA fusions, based on breakpoint location, demonstrated no significant correlations with clinical outcomes. Multigene analysis disclosed 1892 survival-associated genes, and a metagene set of 100 genes subdivided ST-EPN ZFTA-RELA into favorable and unfavorable transcriptome subtypes composed of different cell subpopulations as detected by deconvolution analysis. BGN (biglycan) was identified as the top-ranked survival-associated gene and high BGN expression levels were associated with poor survival (Hazard Ratio 17.85 for PFS and 45.48 for OS; log-rank; p-value < 0.01). Furthermore, BGN immunopositivity was identified as a strong prognostic indicator of poor survival in ST-EPN, and this finding was confirmed in an independent validation set of 56 samples. Our results indicate that integrating BGN expression (at mRNA and/or protein level) into risk stratification models may improve ST-EPN ZFTA-RELA outcome prediction. Therefore, gene and/or protein expression analyses for this molecular marker could be adopted for ST-EPN ZFTA-RELA prognostication and may help assign patients to optimal therapies in prospective clinical trials.

Supra-tentorial Ependymomas with ZFTA Fusion, YAP1 Fusion, and Astroblastomas, MN1-altered: Characteristic Imaging Features

PURPOSE

Supratentorial (ST) ependymoma subgroups are defined by two different fusions with different prognoses. Astroblastomas, MN1-altered, have ependymal-like histopathologic features and represent a differential diagnosis in children. We hypothesized that ZFTA-fused ependymoma and YAP1-fused ependymoma on the one hand, and astroblastoma, MN1-altered, on the other hand, show different MRI characteristics.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the preoperative imaging of 45 patients with ST ependymoma or astroblastoma between January 2000 and September 2020, blinded to histomolecular grouping. Several characteristics, such as location, tumor volume, calcifications, solid/cystic component, and signal enhancement or diffusion were evaluated. We compared imaging characteristics according to their molecular subtype (ZFTA-fused, YAP1-fused, and astroblastoma, MN1-altered).

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients were classified as having an ependymoma, 35 with a ZFTA fusion and four with a YAP1 fusion, and six as having an astroblastoma, MN1-altered. YAP1-fused ependymomas were more likely to involve at least 3 lobes than ZFTA-fused ependymomas. Astroblastomas were located in the frontal lobe in 100% of the tumors versus 49% of the ependymomas. Cerebral blood flow by arterial spin labeling was higher in astroblastomas than in ependymomas. There were no differences in the other characteristics between the molecular groups. All the tumors showed common features: intra-axial extra-ventricular tumors, very frequent contrast enhancement (39/43, 91%), a cystic/necrotic component (41/45, 91%), restricted diffusion (32/36, 89%), calcifications (15/18, 83%), and peri-tumoral edema (38/44, 86%).

CONCLUSION

The distinction between ST ependymoma subtypes and astroblastomas can be guided by several imaging features. These tumors share common imaging features that may help to differentiate ST ependymomas and astroblastomas from other pediatric ST tumors.

Ependymal Tumors: Overview of the Recent World Health Organization Histopathologic and Genetic Updates with an Imaging Characteristic

The 2021 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System (CNS5), introduced significant changes, impacting tumors ranging from glial to ependymal neoplasms. Ependymal tumors were previously classified and graded based on histopathology, which had limited clinical and prognostic utility. The updated CNS5 classification now divides ependymomas into 10 subgroups based on anatomic location (supratentorial, posterior fossa, and spinal compartment) and genomic markers. Supratentorial tumors are defined by zinc finger translocation associated (ZFTA) (formerly v-rel avian reticuloendotheliosis viral oncogene [RELA]), or yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1) fusion; posterior fossa tumors are classified into groups A (PFA) and B (PFB), spinal ependymomas are defined by MYCN amplification. Subependymomas are present across all these anatomic compartments. The new classification kept an open category of "not elsewhere classified" or "not otherwise specified" if no pathogenic gene fusion is identified or if the molecular diagnosis is not feasible. Although there is significant overlap in the imaging findings of these tumors, a neuroradiologist needs to be familiar with updated CNS5 classification to understand tumor behavior, for example, the higher tendency for tumor recurrence along the dural flap for ZFTA fusion-positive ependymomas. On imaging, supratentorial ZFTA-fused ependymomas are preferentially located in the cerebral cortex, carrying predominant cystic components. YAP1-MAMLD1-fused ependymomas are intra- or periventricular with prominent multinodular solid components and have significantly better prognosis than ZFTA-fused counterparts. PFA ependymomas are aggressive paramedian masses with frequent calcification, seen in young children, originating from the lateral part of the fourth ventricular roof. PFB ependymomas are usually midline, noncalcified solid-cystic masses seen in adolescents and young adults arising from the fourth ventricular floor. PFA has a poorer prognosis, higher recurrence, and higher metastatic rate than PFB. Myxopapillary spinal ependymomas are now considered grade II due to high recurrence rates. Spinal-MYCN ependymomas are aggressive tumors with frequent leptomeningeal spread, relapse, and poor prognosis. Subependymomas are noninvasive, intraventricular, slow-growing benign tumors with an excellent prognosis. Currently, the molecular classification does not enhance the clinicopathologic understanding of subependymoma and myxopapillary categories. However, given the molecular advancements, this will likely change in the future. This review provides an updated molecular classification of ependymoma, discusses the individual imaging characteristics, and briefly outlines the latest targeted molecular therapies.

Rare Oncogenic Fusions in Pediatric Central Nervous System Tumors: A Case Series and Literature Review

Background and Objectives: Central Nervous System (CNS) pediatric tumors represent the most common solid tumors in children with a wide variability in terms of survival and therapeutic response. By contrast to their adult counterpart, the mutational landscape of pediatric CNS tumors is characterized by oncogenic fusions rather than multiple mutated genes. CNS pediatric tumors associated with oncogenic fusions represent a complex landscape of tumors with wide radiological, morphological and clinical heterogeneity. In the fifth CNS WHO classification, there are few pediatric CNS tumors for which diagnosis is based on a single oncogenic fusion. This work aims to provide an overview of the impact of rare oncogenic fusions (NTRK, ROS, ALK, MET, FGFR, RAF, MN1, BCOR and CIC genes) on pathogenesis, histological phenotype, diagnostics and theranostics in pediatric CNS tumors. We report four cases of pediatric CNS tumors associated with NTRK (n = 2), ROS (n = 1) and FGFR3 (n = 1) oncogenic fusion genes as a proof of concept. Cases presentation and literature review: The literature review and the cohort that we described here underline that most of these rare oncogenic fusions are not specific to a single morpho-molecular entity. Even within tumors harboring the same oncogenic fusions, a wide range of morphological, molecular and epigenetic entities can be observed. Conclusions: These findings highlight the need for caution when applying the fifth CNS WHO classification, as the vast majority of these fusions are not yet incorporated in the diagnosis, including grade evaluation and DNA methylation classification.

Astroblastoma With a Novel YAP1::BEND2 Fusion: A Case Report

In the most recent fifth edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System, astroblastoma has been defined by molecular rearrangements involving the MN1 gene, with common partners being BEND2 or CXXC5 . Accordingly, this tumor entity is now known as "astroblastoma, MN1 -altered." However, gliomas with EWSR1::BEND2 fusions, devoid of MN1 fusion alterations, have recently been shown to exhibit astroblastoma-like histomorphologic features and reside in a distinct epigenetic subgroup based on DNA methylation studies similar to high-grade neuroepithelial tumor with MN1 alteration, which includes astroblastoma, MN1 altered tumors. This new epigenetically distinct subtype of astroblastoma containing EWSR1::BEND2 fusions lacks the required MN1 alteration and, thus, does not satisfy the current molecular classification of these lesions. Here, we describe a case of glioma with histologic features and DNA methylation profiling consistent with astroblastoma with a novel YAP1: : BEND2 fusion. This case and others further expand the molecular findings observable in astroblastoma-like tumors outside the constraints of MN1 alteration. Such cases of astroblastoma with EWSR1::BEND2 and YAP1::BEND2 fusions challenge the current molecular classification of astroblastoma based solely on an MN1 alteration.

Biomolecular condensates: hubs of Hippo-YAP/TAZ signaling in cancer

Biomolecular condensates, the membraneless cellular compartments formed by liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS), represent an important mechanism for physiological and tumorigenic processes. Recent studies have advanced our understanding of how these condensates formed in the cytoplasm or nucleus regulate Hippo signaling, a central player in organogenesis and tumorigenesis. Here, we review recent findings on the dynamic formation and function of biomolecular condensates in regulating the Hippo-yes-associated protein (YAP)/transcription coactivator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ) signaling pathway under physiological and pathological processes. We further discuss how the nuclear condensates of YAP- or TAZ-fusion oncoproteins compartmentalize crucial transcriptional co-activators and alter chromatin architecture to promote oncogenic programs. Finally, we highlight key questions regarding how these findings may pave the way for novel therapeutics to target cancer.

Exploring a distinct FGFR2::DLG5 rearrangement in a low-grade neuroepithelial tumor: A case report and mini-review of protein fusions in brain tumors

We report the novel clinical presentation of a primary brain neoplasm in a 30-year-old man with a mass-like area in the anteromedial temporal lobe. Histopathological analysis revealed a low-grade neuroepithelial tumor with cytologically abnormal neurons and atypical glial cells within the cerebral cortex. Molecular analysis showed a previously undescribed FGFR2::DLG5 rearrangement. We discuss the clinical significance and molecular implications of this fusion event, shedding light on its potential impact on tumor development and patient prognosis. Additionally, an extensive review places the finding in this case in the context of protein fusions in brain tumors in general and highlights their diverse manifestations, underlying molecular mechanisms, and therapeutic implications.

CNS tumors with PLAGL1-fusion: beyond ZFTA and YAP1 in the genetic spectrum of supratentorial ependymomas

A novel methylation class, "neuroepithelial tumor, with PLAGL1 fusion" (NET-PLAGL1), has recently been described, based on epigenetic features, as a supratentorial pediatric brain tumor with recurrent histopathological features suggesting an ependymal differentiation. Because of the recent identification of this neoplastic entity, few histopathological, radiological and clinical data are available. Herein, we present a detailed series of nine cases of PLAGL1-fused supratentorial tumors, reclassified from a series of supratentorial ependymomas, non-ZFTA/non-YAP1 fusion-positive and subependymomas of the young. This study included extensive clinical, radiological, histopathological, ultrastructural, immunohistochemical, genetic and epigenetic (DNA methylation profiling) data for characterization. An important aim of this work was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of a novel fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) targeting the PLAGL1 gene. Using histopathology, immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy, we confirmed the ependymal differentiation of this new neoplastic entity. Indeed, the cases histopathologically presented as "mixed subependymomas-ependymomas" with well-circumscribed tumors exhibiting a diffuse immunoreactivity for GFAP, without expression of Olig2 or SOX10. Ultrastructurally, they also harbored features reminiscent of ependymal differentiation, such as cilia. Different gene partners were fused with PLAGL1: FOXO1, EWSR1 and for the first time MAML2. The PLAGL1 FISH presented a 100% sensitivity and specificity according to RNA sequencing and DNA methylation profiling results. This cohort of supratentorial PLAGL1-fused tumors highlights: 1/ the ependymal cell origin of this new neoplastic entity; 2/ benefit of looking for a PLAGL1 fusion in supratentorial cases of non-ZFTA/non-YAP1 ependymomas; and 3/ the usefulness of PLAGL1 FISH.

Pediatric CNS tumors and 2021 WHO classification: what do oncologists need from pathologists?

The fifth edition of the WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System (CNS), published in 2021, established new approaches to both CNS tumor nomenclature and grading, emphasizing the importance of integrated diagnoses and layered reports. This edition increased the role of molecular diagnostics in CNS tumor classification while still relying on other established approaches such as histology and immunohistochemistry. Moreover, it introduced new tumor types and subtypes based on novel diagnostic technologies such as DNA methylome profiling. Over the past decade, molecular techniques identified numerous key genetic alterations in CSN tumors, with important implications regarding the understanding of pathogenesis but also for prognosis and the development and application of effective molecularly targeted therapies. This review summarizes the major changes in the 2021 fifth edition classification of pediatric CNS tumors, highlighting for each entity the molecular alterations and other information that are relevant for diagnostic, prognostic, or therapeutic purposes and that patients' and oncologists' need from a pathology report.

In vitro and in vivo modeling systems of supratentorial ependymomas

Ependymomas are rare brain tumors that can occur in both children and adults. Subdivided by the tumors' initial location, ependymomas develop in the central nervous system in the supratentorial or infratentorial/posterior fossa region, or the spinal cord. Supratentorial ependymomas (ST-EPNs) are predominantly characterized by common driver gene fusions such as ZFTA and YAP1 fusions. Some variants of ST-EPNs carry a high overall survival rate. In poorly responding ST-EPN variants, high levels of inter- and intratumoral heterogeneity, limited therapeutic strategies, and tumor recurrence are among the reasons for poor patient outcomes with other ST-EPN subtypes. Thus, modeling these molecular profiles is key in further studying tumorigenesis. Due to the scarcity of patient samples, the development of preclinical in vitro and in vivo models that recapitulate patient tumors is imperative when testing therapeutic approaches for this rare cancer. In this review, we will survey ST-EPN modeling systems, addressing the strengths and limitations, application for therapeutic targeting, and current literature findings.

Brain Tumor Imaging in Adolescents and Young Adults: 2021 WHO Updates for Molecular-based Tumor Types

Published in 2021, the fifth edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) introduced new molecular criteria for tumor types that commonly occur in either pediatric or adult age groups. Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) are at the intersection of adult and pediatric care, and both pediatric-type and adult-type CNS tumors occur at that age. Mortality rates for AYAs with CNS tumors have increased by 0.6% per year for males and 1% per year for females from 2007 to 2016. To best serve patients, it is crucial that both pediatric and adult radiologists who interpret neuroimages are familiar with the various pediatric- and adult-type brain tumors and their typical imaging morphologic characteristics. Gliomas account for approximately 80% of all malignant CNS tumors in the AYA age group, with the most common types observed being diffuse astrocytic and glioneuronal tumors. Ependymomas and medulloblastomas also occur in the AYA population but are seen less frequently. Importantly, biologic behavior and progression of distinct molecular subgroups of brain tumors differ across ages. This review discusses newly added or revised gliomas in the fifth edition of the CNS WHO classification, as well as other CNS tumor types common in the AYA population.

Ependymoma from Benign to Highly Aggressive Diseases: A Review

Ependymomas comprise biologically distinct tumor types with respect to age distribution, (epi)genetics, localization, and prognosis. Multimodal risk-stratification, including histopathological and molecular features, is essential in these biologically defined tumor types. Gross total resection (GTR), achieved with intraoperative monitoring and neuronavigation, and if necessary, second-look surgery, is the most effective treatment. Adjuvant radiation therapy is mandatory in high-risk tumors and in case of residual tumor. There is yet growing evidence that some ependymal tumors may be cured by surgery alone. To date, the role of chemotherapy is unclear and subject of current studies.Even though standard therapy can achieve reasonable survival rates for the majority of ependymoma patients, long-term follow-up still reveals a high probability of relapse in certain biological entities.With increasing knowledge of biologically distinct tumor types, risk-adapted adjuvant therapy gains importance. Beyond initial tumor control, and avoidance of therapy-induced morbidity for low-risk patients, intensified treatment for high-risk patients comprises another challenge. With identification of specific risk features regarding molecular alterations, targeted therapy may represent an option for individualized treatment modalities in the future.

[Contributions and limitations of FISH analysis for the diagnosis of central nervous system tumors according to the 2021 WHO classification: Feedback from Sainte-Anne Hospital's Department of Neuropathology]

The fifth edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System has identified many new tumor types and has established, for the first time, essential and desirable diagnostic criteria for each of them. Among these, genetic alterations play an important role associated with morphology. For the first time, epigenetic data can also constitute essential and/or desirable criteria. These genetic abnormalities can be fusions, deletions or gains/amplifications and can thus be detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques. The purpose of this article is to present the advantages and limitations of this technique in reference to its specific use within neuro-oncopathology in light of the 2021 WHO classification.

Molecular diagnostic tools for the World Health Organization (WHO) 2021 classification of gliomas, glioneuronal and neuronal tumors; an EANO guideline

In the 5th edition of the WHO CNS tumor classification (CNS5, 2021), multiple molecular characteristics became essential diagnostic criteria for many additional CNS tumor types. For those tumors, an integrated, "histomolecular" diagnosis is required. A variety of approaches exists for determining the status of the underlying molecular markers. The present guideline focuses on the methods that can be used for assessment of the currently most informative diagnostic and prognostic molecular markers for the diagnosis of gliomas, glioneuronal and neuronal tumors. The main characteristics of the molecular methods are systematically discussed, followed by recommendations and information on available evidence levels for diagnostic measures. The recommendations cover DNA and RNA next-generation-sequencing, methylome profiling, and select assays for single/limited target analyses, including immunohistochemistry. Additionally, because of its importance as a predictive marker in IDH-wildtype glioblastomas, tools for the analysis of MGMT promoter methylation status are covered. A structured overview of the different assays with their characteristics, especially their advantages and limitations, is provided, and requirements for input material and reporting of results are clarified. General aspects of molecular diagnostic testing regarding clinical relevance, accessibility, cost, implementation, regulatory, and ethical aspects are discussed as well. Finally, we provide an outlook on new developments in the landscape of molecular testing technologies in neuro-oncology.

Identification of HDAC4 as a potential therapeutic target and prognostic biomarker for ZFTA-fused ependymomas

Members of the HDAC family are predictive biomarkers and regulate the tumorigenesis in several cancers. However, the role of these genes in the biology of intracranial ependymomas (EPNs) remains unexplored. Here, an analysis of eighteen HDACs genes in an EPN transcriptomic dataset, revealed significantly higher levels of HDAC4 in supratentorial ZFTA fusion (ST-ZFTA) compared with ST-YAP1 fusion and posterior fossa EPNs, while HDAC7 and SIRT2 were downregulated in ST-ZFTA. HDAC4 was also overexpressed in ST-ZFTA as measured by single-cell RNA-Seq, quantitative real time-polymerase chain reaction, and immunohistochemistry. Survival analyses showed a significantly worse outcome for EPNs with higher HDAC4 and SIRT1 mRNA levels. Ontology enrichment analysis showed an HDAC4-high signature consistent with viral processes while collagen-containing extracellular matrix and cell-cell junction were enriched in those with an HDAC4-low signature. Immune gene analysis demonstrated a correlation between HDAC4 expression and low levels of NK resting cells. Several small molecules compounds targeting HDAC4 and ABCG2, were predicted by in silico analysis to be effective against HDAC4-high ZFTA. Our results provide novel insights into the biology of the HDAC family in intracranial ependymomas and reveal HDAC4 as a prognostic marker and potential therapeutic target in ST-ZFTA.

Latest classification of ependymoma in the molecular era and advances in its treatment: a review

Ependymoma is a rare central nervous system (CNS) tumour occurring in all age groups and is one of the most common paediatric malignant brain tumours. Unlike other malignant brain tumours, ependymomas have few identified point mutations and genetic and epigenetic features. With advances in molecular understanding, the latest 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of CNS tumours divided ependymomas into 10 diagnostic categories based on the histology, molecular information and location; this accurately reflected the prognosis and biology of this tumour. Although maximal surgical resection followed by radiotherapy is considered the standard treatment method, and chemotherapy is considered ineffective, the validation of the role of these treatment modalities continues. Although the rarity and long-term clinical course of ependymoma make designing and conducting prospective clinical trials challenging, knowledge is steadily accumulating and progress is being made. Much of the clinical knowledge obtained from clinical trials to date was based on the previous histology-based WHO classifications, and the addition of new molecular information may lead to more complex treatment strategies. Therefore, this review presents the latest findings on the molecular classification of ependymomas and advances in its treatment.

Pediatric Central Nervous System Tumor Overview and Emerging Treatment Considerations

Pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors are the most common solid tumor in children, with the majority being glial in origin. These tumors are classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) as either being low grade (WHO grade 1 and 2) or high grade (WHO grade 3 and 4). Our knowledge of the molecular landscape of pediatric brain tumors has advanced over the last decade, which has led to newer categorizations along with an expansion of therapeutic targets and options. In this review, we will give an overview of common CNS tumors seen in children along with a focus on treatment options and future considerations.

Pediatric diencephalic tumors: a constellation of entities and management modalities

The diencephalon is a complex midline structure consisting of the hypothalamus, neurohypophysis, subthalamus, thalamus, epithalamus, and pineal body. Tumors arising from each of these diencephalic components differ significantly in terms of biology and prognosis. The aim of this comprehensive review is to describe the epidemiology, clinical symptoms, imaging, histology, and molecular markers in the context of the 2021 WHO classification of central nervous system neoplasms. We will also discuss the current management of each of these tumors.

A Radiologist's Guide to the 2021 WHO Central Nervous System Tumor Classification: Part 2-Newly Described and Revised Tumor Types

The fifth edition of the World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system (CNS), published in 2021, introduces major shifts in the classification of brain and spine tumors. These changes were necessitated by rapidly increasing knowledge of CNS tumor biology and therapies, much of which is based on molecular methods in tumor diagnosis. The growing complexity of CNS tumor genetics has required reorganization of tumor groups and acknowledgment of new tumor entities. For radiologists interpreting neuroimaging studies, proficiency with these updates is critical in providing excellent patient care. This review will focus on new or revised CNS tumor types and subtypes, beyond infiltrating glioma (described in part 1 of this series), with an emphasis on imaging features.

Classification and neuroimaging of ependymal tumors

Ependymal tumors arise from the ependymal cell remnants of the cerebral ventricles, the central canal of the spinal cord, or the filum terminale or conus medullaris, although most pediatric supratentorial ependymomas do not exhibit clear communication or abutment of the ventricles. In this article, we discuss the classification, imaging characteristics, and clinical settings of these tumors. The WHO 2021 classification system has categorized ependymal tumors based on histopathologic and molecular features and location, in which they are grouped as supratentorial, posterior fossa (PF), and spinal. The supratentorial tumors are defined by either the ZFTA (formerly RELA) fusion or the YAP1 fusion. Posterior fossa tumors are divided into group A and group B based on methylation. On imaging, supratentorial and infratentorial ependymomas may arise from the ventricles and commonly contain calcifications and cystic components, with variable hemorrhage and heterogeneous enhancement. Spinal ependymomas are defined by MYCN amplification. These tumors are less commonly calcified and may present with the "cap sign," with T2 hypointensity due to hemosiderin deposition. Myxopapillary ependymoma and subependymoma remain tumor subtypes, with no change related to molecular classification as this does not provide additional clinical utility. Myxopapillary ependymomas are intradural and extramedullary tumors at the filum terminale and/or conus medullaris and may also present the cap sign. Subependymomas are homogeneous when small and may be heterogeneous and contain calcifications when larger. These tumors typically do not demonstrate enhancement. Clinical presentation and prognosis vary depending on tumor location and type. Knowledge of the updated WHO classification of the central nervous system in conjunction with imaging features is critical for accurate diagnosis and treatment.

[Pediatric Intracranial Ependymoma - Recommendations for First-Line Treatment from the German HIT-MED study group]

Biological subtypes of ependymoma (EPN) have been introduced by the recent WHO classification and appear to have great impact on the clinical course, but have not yet found their way into clinical risk stratification. Further, the overall unfavorable prognosis underlines the fact that current therapeutic strategies need further evaluation for improvement. To date, there is no international consensus regarding first-line treatment for children with intracranial EPN. Extent of resection is known to be the most important clinical risk factor, leading to the consensus that consequent evaluation for re-surgery of postoperative residual tumor needs to have highest priority. Furthermore, efficacy of local irradiation is unquestioned and recommended for patients aged>1 year. In contrast, efficacy of chemotherapy is still under discussion. The European trial SIOP Ependymoma II aims at evaluating efficacy of different chemotherapy elements, leading to the recommendation to include German patients. The BIOMECA study, as biological accompanying study, aims at identifying new prognostic parameters. These results might help to develop targeted therapies for unfavorable biological subtypes. For patient who are not qualified for inclusion into the interventional strata, the HIT-MED Guidance 5.2 provides specific recommendations. This article is meant as an overview of national guidelines regarding diagnostics and treatment as well as of treatment according to the SIOP Ependymoma II trial protocol.

Changes to pediatric brain tumors in 2021 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system

New tumor types are continuously being described with advances in molecular testing and genomic analysis resulting in better prognostics, new targeted therapy options and improved patient outcomes. As a result of these advances, pathological classification of tumors is periodically updated with new editions of the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors books. In 2021, WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System, 5^th edition (CNS5), was published with major changes in pediatric brain tumors officially recognized including pediatric gliomas being separated from adult gliomas, ependymomas being categorized based on anatomical compartment and many new tumor types, most of them seen in children. Additional general changes, such as tumor grading now being done within tumor types rather than across entities and changes in definition of glioblastoma, are also relevant to pediatric neuro-oncology practice. The purpose of this manuscript is to highlight the major changes in pediatric brain tumors in CNS5 most relevant to radiologists. Additionally, brief descriptions of newly recognized entities will be presented with a focus on imaging findings.

Early ependymal tumor with MN1-BEND2 fusion: a mostly cerebral tumor of female children with a good prognosis that is distinct from classical astroblastoma

PURPOSE

Review of the clinicopathologic and genetic features of early ependymal tumor with MN1-BEND2 fusion (EET MN1-BEND2), classical astroblastomas, and recently described related pediatric CNS tumors. I also briefly review general mechanisms of gene expression silencing by DNA methylation and chromatin remodeling, and genomic DNA methylation profiling as a powerful new tool for CNS tumor classification.

METHODS

Literature review and illustration of tumor histopathologic features and prenatal gene expression timelines.

RESULTS

Astroblastoma, originally descried by Bailey and Cushing in 1926, has been an enigmatic tumor. Whether they are of ependymal or astrocytic derivation was argued for decades. Recent genetic evidence supports existence of both ependymal and astrocytic astroblastoma-like tumors. Studies have shown that tumors exhibiting astroblastoma-like histology can be classified into discrete entities based on their genomic DNA methylation profiles, gene expression, and in some cases, the presence of unique gene fusions. One such tumor, EET MN1-BEND2 occurs mostly in female children, and has an overall very good prognosis with surgical management. It contains a gene fusion comprised of portions of the MN1 gene at chromosomal location 22q12.1 and the BEND2 gene at Xp22.13. Other emerging pediatric CNS tumor entities demonstrating ependymal or astroblastoma-like histological features also harbor gene fusions involving chromosome X, 11q22 and 22q12 breakpoint regions.

CONCLUSIONS

Genomic DNA profiling has facilitated discovery of several new CNS tumor entities, however, traditional methods, such as immunohistochemistry, DNA or RNA sequencing, and cytogenetic studies, including fluorescence in situ hybridization, remain necessary for their accurate biological classification and diagnosis.

Nuclear condensates of YAP fusion proteins alter transcription to drive ependymoma tumourigenesis

Nuclear localization of HIPPO-YAP fusion proteins has been implicated in supratentorial ependymoma development. Here, unexpectedly, we find that liquid-liquid phase separation, rather than nuclear localization, of recurrent patient-derived YAP fusions, YAP-MAMLD1 and C11ORF95-YAP, underlies ependymoma tumourigenesis from neural progenitor cells. Mutagenesis and chimaera assays demonstrate that an intrinsically disordered region promotes oligomerization of the YAP fusions into nuclear, puncta-like, membrane-less condensates. Oligomerization and nuclear condensates induced by YAP fusion with a coiled-coil domain of transcriptional activator GCN4 also promote ependymoma formation. YAP-MAMLD1 concentrates transcription factors and co-activators, including BRD4, MED1 and TEAD, in condensates while excluding transcriptional repressive PRC2, and induces long-range enhancer-promoter interactions that promote transcription and oncogenic programmes. Blocking condensate-mediated transcriptional co-activator activity inhibits tumourigenesis, indicating a critical role of liquid phase separation for YAP fusion oncogenic activity in ependymoma. YAP fusions containing the intrinsically disordered region features are common in human tumours, suggesting that nuclear condensates could be targeted to treat YAP-fusion-induced cancers.

Ependymomas

Ependymal neoplasms are a heterogenous group of neoplasms arising from the progenitors of the cells lining the ventricular system and the spinal central canal. During the last few years, significant novel data concerning oncogenesis, molecular characteristics and clinical correlations of these tumours have been collected, with a strong relevance for their pathological classification. The recently published 5th edition of WHO Classification of Central Nervous System Tumours integrates this novel knowledge and represents a substantial update compared to the previous edition. Concerning supratentorial ependymomas, the previous RELA fusion-positive ependymoma has been renamed into ZFTA fusion-positive and the novel YAP1 fusion-positive ependymoma subtype has been added. Posterior fossa ependymomas should now be allocated either to the Type A or Type B subtypes based on molecular profiling or using the H3 K27me3 immunohistochemical surrogate. Regarding spinal ependymomas, a novel subtype has been added based on a distinctive molecular trait, presence of MYCN amplification, and on the unfavourable outcome. Finally, myxopapillary ependymoma is now classified as a grade 2 tumour in accordance with its overall prognosis which mirrors that of conventional spinal ependymomas. The aim of this review is to present these changes and summarize the current diagnostic framework of ependymal tumours, according to the most recent updates.

Imaging Characteristics of CNS Neuroblastoma-FOXR2: A Retrospective and Multi-Institutional Description of 25 Cases

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of CNS tumors defines the CNS neuroblastoma FOXR2 in the group of embryonal tumors. Published clinical outcomes tend to suggest a favorable outcome after resection, craniospinal irradiation, and chemotherapy. This multicenter study aimed to describe imaging features of CNS neuroblastoma-FOXR2, which have been poorly characterized thus far.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

On the basis of a previously published cohort of tumors molecularly classified as CNS neuroblastoma-FOXR2, patients with available imaging data were identified. The imaging features on preoperative MR imaging and CT data were recorded by 8 experienced pediatric neuroradiologists in consensus review meetings.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were evaluated (13 girls; median age, 4.5 years). The tumors were often large (mean, 115 [ SD, 83] mL), showed no (24%) or limited (60%) perilesional edema, demonstrated heterogeneous enhancement, were often calcified and/or hemorrhagic (52%), were always T2WI-hyperintense to GM, and commonly had cystic and/or necrotic components (96%). The mean ADC values were low (687.8 [SD 136.3] × 10-6 mm2/s). The tumors were always supratentorial. Metastases were infrequent (20%) and, when present, were of nodular appearance and leptomeningeal.

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort, CNS neuroblastoma FOXR2 tumors showed imaging features suggesting high-grade malignancy and, at the same time, showed characteristics of less aggressive behavior. There are important differential diagnoses, but the results of this study may assist in considering this diagnosis preoperatively.

Major Changes in 2021 World Health Organization Classification of Central Nervous System Tumors

The World Health Organization (WHO) published the fifth edition of the WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System (WHO CNS5) in 2021, as an update of the WHO central nervous system (CNS) classification system published in 2016. WHO CNS5 was drafted on the basis of recommendations from the Consortium to Inform Molecular and Practical Approaches to CNS Tumor Taxonomy (cIMPACT-NOW) and expounds the classification scheme of the previous edition, which emphasized the importance of genetic and molecular changes in the characteristics of CNS tumors. Multiple newly recognized tumor types, including those for which there is limited knowledge regarding neuroimaging features, are detailed in WHO CNS5. The authors describe the major changes introduced in WHO CNS5, including revisions to tumor nomenclature. For example, WHO grade IV tumors in the fourth edition are equivalent to CNS WHO grade 4 tumors in the fifth edition, and diffuse midline glioma, H3 K27M-mutant, is equivalent to midline glioma, H3 K27-altered. With regard to tumor typing, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant glioblastoma has been modified to IDH-mutant astrocytoma. In tumor grading, IDH-mutant astrocytomas are now graded according to the presence or absence of homozygous CDKN2A/B deletion. Moreover, the molecular mechanisms of tumorigenesis, as well as the clinical characteristics and imaging features of the tumor types newly recognized in WHO CNS5, are summarized. Given that WHO CNS5 has become the foundation for daily practice, radiologists need to be familiar with this new edition of the WHO CNS tumor classification system. Online supplemental material and the slide presentation from the RSNA Annual Meeting are available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2022.

Updates in the classification of ependymal neoplasms: The 2021 WHO Classification and beyond

Ependymal neoplasms occur at all ages and encompass multiple tumor types and subtypes that develop in the supratentorial compartment, the posterior fossa, or the spinal cord. Clinically, ependymomas represent a very heterogeneous group of tumors from rather benign subependymomas to very aggressive and often deadly childhood ependymomas of the posterior fossa. Newly identified biological markers and classification schemes, e. g. based on global DNA methylation profiling, have led to the definition of 10 types of ependymal tumors and an improved prediction of patients' outcome by applying the new classification system. While the exact genetic basis for several ependymoma types still remains unclear, the knowledge about ependymoma driving events has significantly increased within the last decade and contributed to a classification based on molecular characteristics and localization rather than histological features alone. Convincing evidence is now pointing towards gene fusions involving ZFTA or YAP1 causing the development of supratentorial ependymomas. Also, H3, EZHIP, or TERT mutations have been detected in a fraction of infratentorial ependymal tumors. Finally, MYCN amplifications have recently been identified in spinal ependymomas, in addition to the previously known mutations in NF2. This review summarizes how recent findings regarding biology, molecular tumor typing, and clinical outcome have impacted the classification of ependymomas as suggested by the updated 2021 WHO CNS tumor classification system. We focus on changes compared to the previous classification of 2016 and discuss how a formal grading could evolve in the future and guide clinicians to treat ependymoma patients.

Ependymoma: Evaluation and Management Updates

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review state of art and relevant advances in the molecular genetics and management of ependymomas of children and adults.

RECENT FINDINGS

Ependymomas may occur either in the brain or in the spinal cord. Compared with intracranial ependymomas, spinal ependymomas are less frequent and exhibit a better prognosis. The new WHO classification of CNS tumors of 2021 has subdivided ependymomas into different histomolecular subgroups with different outcome. The majority of studies have shown a major impact of extent of resection; thus, a complete resection must be performed, whenever possible, at first surgery or at reoperation. Conformal radiotherapy is recommended for grade 3 or incompletely resected grade II tumors. Proton therapy is increasingly employed especially in children to reduce the risk of neurocognitive and endocrine sequelae. Craniospinal irradiation is reserved for metastatic disease. Chemotherapy is not useful as primary treatment and is commonly employed as salvage treatment for patients failing surgery and radiotherapy. Standard treatments are still the mainstay of treatment: the discovery of new druggable pathways will hopefully increase the therapeutic armamentarium in the near future.

Essential Management of Pediatric Brain Tumors

Brain tumors are the most common solid tumors in children and are associated with high mortality. The most common childhood brain tumors are grouped as low-grade gliomas (LGG), high grade gliomas (HGG), ependymomas, and embryonal tumors, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). Advances in molecular genetics have led to a shift from pure histopathological diagnosis to integrated diagnosis. For the first time, these new criteria were included in the WHO classification published in 2016 and has been further updated in the 2021 edition. Integrated diagnosis is based on molecular genomic similarities of the tumor subclasses, and it can better explain the differences in clinical courses of previously histopathologically identical entities. Important advances have also been made in pediatric neuro-oncology. A growing understanding of the molecular-genetic background of tumorigenesis has improved the diagnostic accuracy. Re-stratification of treatment protocols and the development of targeted therapies will significantly affect overall survival and quality of life. For some pediatric tumors, these advances have significantly improved therapeutic management and prognosis in certain tumor subgroups. Some therapeutic approaches also have serious long-term consequences. Therefore, optimized treatments are greatly needed. Here, we discuss the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration and the role of (pediatric) neurosurgery by briefly describing the most common childhood brain tumors and their currently recognized molecular subgroups.

The oncogenic fusion landscape in pediatric CNS neoplasms

Pediatric neoplasms in the central nervous system (CNS) are the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in children. Recent developments in molecular analyses have greatly contributed to a more accurate diagnosis and risk stratification of CNS tumors. Additionally, sequencing studies have identified various, often entity specific, tumor-driving events. In contrast to adult tumors, which often harbor multiple mutated oncogenic drivers, the number of mutated genes in pediatric cancers is much lower and many tumors can have a single oncogenic driver. Moreover, in children, much more than in adults, fusion proteins play an important role in driving tumorigenesis, and many different fusions have been identified as potential driver events in pediatric CNS neoplasms. However, a comprehensive overview of all the different reported oncogenic fusion proteins in pediatric CNS neoplasms is still lacking. A better understanding of the fusion proteins detected in these tumors and of the molecular mechanisms how these proteins drive tumorigenesis, could improve diagnosis and further benefit translational research into targeted therapies necessary to treat these distinct entities. In this review, we discuss the different oncogenic fusions reported in pediatric CNS neoplasms and their structure to create an overview of the variety of oncogenic fusion proteins to date, the tumor entities they occur in and their proposed mode of action.

The biology of ependymomas and emerging novel therapies

Ependymomas are rare central nervous system tumours that can arise in the brain's supratentorial region or posterior fossa, or in the spinal cord. In 1924, Percival Bailey published the first comprehensive study of ependymomas. Since then, and especially over the past 10 years, our understanding of ependymomas has grown exponentially. In this Review, we discuss the evolution in knowledge regarding ependymoma subgroups and the resultant clinical implications. We also discuss key oncogenic and tumour suppressor signalling pathways that regulate tumour growth, the role of epigenetic dysregulation in the biology of ependymomas, and the various biological features of ependymoma tumorigenesis, including cell immortalization, stem cell-like properties, the tumour microenvironment and metastasis. We further review the limitations of current therapies such as relapse, radiation-induced cognitive deficits and chemotherapy resistance. Finally, we highlight next-generation therapies that are actively being explored, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors, telomerase inhibitors, anti-angiogenesis agents and immunotherapy.

Molecular subgrouping of ependymoma across three anatomic sites and their prognostic implications

The 2021 WHO classification stratifies ependymoma (EPN) into nine molecular subgroups according to the anatomic locations which outperforms histological grading. We aimed at molecularly reclassifying 200 EPN using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and sequencing for ZFTA fusions in supratentorial (ST) EPN. Further, we assessed the utility of L1CAM, cyclinD1, and p65 markers in identifying ZFTA fusion. Demographic profiles, histologic features, molecular subgroups and clinical outcome were retrospectively analyzed. IHC for L1CAM, cyclinD1, p65, H3K27me3, and H3K27M and sequencing for ZFTA fusion were performed. ZFTA fusions were identified in 44.8% ST EPN. p65 displayed the highest specificity (93.8%), while L1CAM had the highest sensitivity (92.3%) in detecting ZFTA fusions. The negative predictive value approached 96.6% and sensitivity improved to 96.2% with combinatorial IHC (L1CAM, cyclinD1, p65). H3K27me3 loss (PF-A) was noted in 65% PF EPN. Our results provide evidence that a combination of two of three (L1CAM, p65, and cyclinD1) can be used as surrogate markers for predicting fusion. ZFTA fusion, and its surrogate markers in ST, and H3K27me3 and younger age (< 5 years) in PF showed significant correlation with PFS and OS on univariate and Kaplan-Meier analysis. On multivariate analysis, H3K27me3 loss and younger age group are associated with poor clinical outcome.

The Hippo pathway in cancer: YAP/TAZ and TEAD as therapeutic targets in cancer

Tumorigenesis is a highly complex process, involving many interrelated and cross-acting signalling pathways. One such pathway that has garnered much attention in the field of cancer research over the last decade is the Hippo signalling pathway. Consisting of two antagonistic modules, the pathway plays an integral role in both tumour suppressive and oncogenic processes, generally via regulation of a diverse set of genes involved in a range of biological functions. This review discusses the history of the pathway within the context of cancer and explores some of the most recent discoveries as to how this critical transducer of cellular signalling can influence cancer progression. A special focus is on the various recent efforts to therapeutically target the key effectors of the pathway in both preclinical and clinical settings.

Pearls and Pitfalls of Imaging in Pediatric Brain Tumors

The central nervous system (CNS) tumors constitute the most common type of solid tumors in the pediatric population. The cerebral and cerebellar parenchyma are the most common site of pediatric CNS neoplasms. Imaging plays an important role in detection, characterization, staging and prognostication of brain tumors. The focus of the current article is pediatric brain tumor imaging with emphasis on pearls and pitfalls of conventional and advanced imaging in various pediatric brain tumor subtypes. The article also elucidates changes in brain tumor terms and entities as applicable to pediatric patients, updated as per World Health Organization (WHO) 2016 classification of primary CNS tumors. This classification introduced the genetic and/or molecular information of primary CNS neoplasms as part of comprehensive tumor pathology report in the routine clinical workflow. The concepts from 2016 classification have been further refined based on current research, by the Consortium to Inform Molecular and Practical Approaches to CNS Tumor Taxonomy (cIMPACT-NOW) group and published in the form of updates. The updates serve as guidelines in the time interval between WHO updates and expect to be broadly adopted in the subsequent WHO classification. The current review covers most pediatric brain tumors except pituitary tumors, meningeal origin tumors, nerve sheath tumors and CNS lymphoma/leukemia.

Diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic implications of the 2021 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system

The 2016 revised fourth edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of central nervous system (CNS) tumors incorporated molecular features with histologic grading, revolutionizing how oncologists conceptualize primary brain and spinal cord tumors as well as providing new insights into their management and prognosis. The 2021 revised fifth edition of the WHO classification further integrates molecular alterations for CNS tumor categorization, updating current understanding of the pathophysiology of many of these disease entities. Here, the authors review changes in the new classification for the most common primary adult tumors-gliomas (including astrocytomas, oligodendrogliomas, and ependymomas) and meningiomas-highlighting the key genomic alterations for each group classification to help clinicians interpret them as they consider therapeutic options-including clinical trials and targeted therapies-and discuss the prognosis of these tumors with their patients. The revised, updated 2021 WHO classification also further integrates molecular alterations in the classification of pediatric CNS tumors, but those are not covered in the current review.

Ependymal Tumors

Ependymomas (EPN) are commonly encountered brain tumors in the pediatric population. They may arise in the supratentorial compartment, posterior fossa and spinal cord. Histopathologic grading of EPN has always been challenging with poor interobserver reproducibility and lack of correlation between histologic grade and patient outcomes. Recent studies have highlighted that, despite histopathological similarities among variants of EPN at different anatomical sites, they possess site-specific genetic and epigenetic alterations, transcriptional profiles and DNA copy number variations. This has led to a molecular and location-based classification for EPN which has been adopted by the World Health Organization Classification of Central Nervous System Tumors and more accurately risk-stratifies patients than histopathologic grading alone. Given the complexity of this evolving field, the purpose of this paper is to offer a practical approach to the diagnosis of EPN, including the selection of the most appropriate molecular surrogate immunohistochemical stains, basic molecular studies and more sophisticated techniques if needed. The goal is to reach a rapid, sound diagnosis, providing essential information regarding prognosis and guiding clinical decision-making.