Does the risk of hypersensitivity reactions to iopromide differ by sex, race, or across regions/countries? An analysis of 152 233 patients from 4 observational studies and the company's pharmacovigilance database

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the potential impact of patients' sex, race, and region/country on the risk of hypersensitivity reactions after intra-venous or intra-arterial administration of iopromide.

METHODS

Two analyses were performed. (1) The "Phase-IV-Analysis" evaluated an integrated pooled database of 4 non-interventional studies. (2) The "GPV-Analysis" evaluated case reports from the company's pharmacovigilance database. The Phase-IV-Analysis was a nested case-control analysis of patients who received an injection of iopromide 300/370 mg iodine/mL. Cases had typical/unequivocal HSRs as defined by the ACR Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media 2018. The global pharmacovigilance (GPV)-Analysis was based on HSR case reports in the company database. Exposure estimates were derived from sales/market research data.

RESULTS

The Phase-IV-Analysis comprised 152 233 patients from 37 countries. In the full-analysis set 145 033, 59 412, and 146 649 patients were included in the sex, race, and region/country cohort, respectively. The GPV-Analysis was based on 78.72 million administrations for sex and 118.56 million administrations for region/country. No GPV exposure data by race were available. Sex: Phase-IV-Analysis: The HSR incidence was significantly higher for women (0.72%) vs men (0.55%) (P ≤ .0001). The unadjusted odds ratio (OR) was 1.3 (95% CI, 1.154-1.499), the adjusted OR was 1.156 (95% CI, 1.006-1.328) (P = .04). GPV-Analysis: Reporting rates were 0.0102% for women and 0.0075% for men (P < .0001). OR: 1.36 (95% CI, 1.3-1.43). Race: Phase-IV-Analysis: No significantly different HSR incidences for white (0.70%) and Asian (0.61%) patients (P = .3094) were detected. Region/country: Phase-IV-Analysis: The overall world HSR-incidence was 0.62%. Europe: 0.52%, Asia: 0.70%, United States: 0.75%, Germany: 0.51%, China: 0.41%, South Korea: 0.76%. GPV-Analysis: The overall world HSR-reporting rate was 0.015%, varying across regions/countries.

CONCLUSION

Women showed a slightly higher risk for HSRs than men. Impact of race was not found. HSR-reporting varied by region/country.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Risk for HSRs was increased by female sex but not by race or region/country.

Safety of non-ionic contrast media in CT examinations for out-patients: retrospective multicenter analysis of 473,482 patients

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to explore the incidence of and potential risk factors for adverse drug reactions (ADRs) after non-ionic iodinated contrast media (NICM) administration for CT exams in out-patient settings in China.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 473,482 out-patients who underwent intravenous NICM between January 1st, 2017, and Dec 31st, 2021, were retrospectively enrolled from three institutions. The occurrence of ADRs and clinical information were recorded. Chi-square test, Poisson regression, and logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate potential ADR risk factors and correlation with demographics, season, and NICM type.

RESULTS

Among the 473,482 patients (mean age 55.22 ± 14.85; 253,499 male) who received intravenous NICM, the overall ADR incidence was 0.110% (522 of 473,482), with 0.099% acute-related drug reactions (469 of 473,482) and 0.0004% serious ADRs (two of 473,482). Iopromide was associated with a higher risk of acute ADRs. Late ADRs were more frequently observed with iodixanol 320. Multi-level logistic regression of patients with acute ADRs and a control group (matched 1:1 for age, gender, NICM, prescriber department, and institution) showed that summer (adjusted OR = 1.579; p = 0.035) and autumn (adjusted OR = 1.925; p < 0.001) were risk factors of acute ADRs. However, underlying disease and scanned body area were not related to a higher ADR incidence.

CONCLUSION

The use of NICM for out-patients is in general safe with a low ADR incidence. The type of contrast medium (iopromide) and the seasons (summer and autumn) were associated with a higher risk of acute ADRs. Late ADRs were more often observed with iodixanol.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

In comparison to in-patients, out-patients may be exposed to higher risk due to a lack of extensive risk screening, less nursing care, and higher throughput pressure. Safety data about NICM from a large population may complement guidelines and avoid ambiguity.

KEY POINTS

• The incidence and risk factors for adverse events after using non-ionic iodinated contrast media are complex in out-patients. • Non-ionic iodinated contrast media are safe for out-patients and the overall incidence of adverse drug reactions was 0.110%. • There is a higher risk of acute adverse drug reactions in summer and autumn.

Iopromide safety assessment in a radiology department: A seven-year retrospective characterization of adverse events

BACKGROUND

Since the mid-20th century, contrast agents have been widely used in radiology due to their ability to provide high-definition radiographic images and greater precision in diagnostic exams. Different types of contrast agents are used in image diagnosis, namely radiological media. Despite being considered safe, there are still uncertainties about their safety profile, interactions, and incidence of adverse drug reactions in real-world settings.

OBJECTIVE

To characterise the pattern of adverse events, during 7 years, in a radiology unit.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective observational and descriptive study at an Image Center in Portugal between August 2012 and October 2019. A total of 77,449 computed tomography (CT) were registered, and from those 15,640 cases of iopromide were used as a contrast agent. The authors have accessed, under the authorization, the data of adverse events and procedures after the event.

RESULTS

Most of the hypersensitivity events were immediate or with a short time of onset, with the majority of cases developing events with skin involvement and mild degree, where the most common events were papules (n = 60), pruritus (n = 42), erythema (n = 27) and urticaria (n = 14). Severe events, including hypersensitivity, were mainly represented by vomiting (n = 11), stridor (n = 8), breathing difficulties (n = 7) and syncope (n = 3). Abdominal-pelvic CT exam presented a higher frequency of adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Despite all the current information about iopromide usage, the utilization of this agent is not abstent of risks and its safety profile not fully established. Most frequent symptoms were local, as skin adverse events, including papules, pruritus and erythema. Common medications used to treat or control adverse events were frequently hydrocortisone, clemastine and methylprednisolone.

Acute Adverse Events After Iodinated Contrast Agent Administration of 359,977 Injections: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of patient variables, examination variables, and seasonality on allergic-like and physiologic reactions to iodinated contrast material (ICM).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All ICM-enhanced computed tomography (CT) examinations performed from June 1, 2009, to May 9, 2017, at our institution were included. Reactions were identified and categorized as allergic-like or physiologic and mild, moderate, or severe. The effect of patient and examination variables on reactions was evaluated by logistic regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 359,977 CT examinations performed on 176,886 unique patients were included. A total of 1150 allergic-like reactions (0.32%; 19 severe [0.005%]) and 679 physiologic reactions (0.19%; 3 severe [0.0008%]) occurred. On multivariable analysis, iopromide had higher rates of reactions compared with iohexol (allergic-like reactions: odds ratio [OR], 3.07 [95% CI, 2.37 to 3.98], P<.0001; physiologic reactions: OR, 2.60 [1.92 to 3.52], P<.0001). Non-White patients had higher rates of reactions compared with White patients (allergic-like reactions: OR, 1.77 [1.36-2.30], P<.0001; physiologic reactions: OR, 1.76 [1.27-2.42], P=.0006). Patient age, sex, prior ICM reaction, ICM dose, CT location, and CT type were also significantly associated with reactions. No significant seasonality trend was observed (P=.07 and .80).

CONCLUSION

Non-White patients and patients administered iopromide had higher rates of acute reactions compared with White patients and patients administered iohexol. Younger patients (<50 years vs 51 to 60 years), female sex, history of ICM allergy or other allergies, ICM dose, and contrast-enhanced CT location and type also correlated with higher acute reaction rates.

Incidence and severity of nonionic low-osmolar iodinated contrast medium-related adverse drug reactions in the Republic of Korea: Comparison by generic

We aimed to report the incidence and severity of nonionic low-osmolar iodine contrast medium (ICM)-related adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in the Republic of Korea, by analyzing data from our single tertiary institution and published Korean reports, and to determine whether there is a difference in the incidence of ICM-related ADR by ICM generics. A total of 1,161,419 consecutive contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) examinations between January 2016 and December 2021 at Asan Medical Center were included. A systematic search of the literature investigating the incidence of ICM-related ADR in the Republic of Korea published up to December 31, 2021 was performed. We pooled these outcomes with those of our study using a binomial-normal model, and the pooled incidences of ADRs were compared among ICM generics using chi-square tests. Seven studies with a total of 2,570,986 contrast-enhanced CT examinations from 12 institutions were included. The pooled incidences of overall, mild, moderate, and severe ICM-related ADRs in the Republic of Korea were 0.82% (95% CI: 0.61%-1.10%), 0.72% (95% CI: 0.50%-1.04%), 0.11% (95% CI: 0.08%-0.15%), and 0.013% (95% CI: 0.010%-0.018%), respectively. In multiple pairwise comparisons, there were no significant differences in the overall incidence of ADRs between ICM generics, except iomeprol versus iobitridol and iomeprol versus iohexol. For moderate and severe ADRs, there were no significant differences in ADR incidence between ICM generics. The incidence of moderate and severe ICM-related ADRs did not differ among ICM generics. Our results suggest that no restriction is required for selection among nonionic low-osmolar ICMs.

Nephrotoxicity of iopamidol is associated with mitochondrial impairment in human cell and teleost models

Iopamidol is a nonionic, low-osmolar iodinated contrast agent used for angiography. Its clinical use is associated with renal dysfunction. Patients suffering from preexisting kidney disease have an increased risk of renal failure upon iopamidol administration. Studies in animals confirmed renal toxicity, but the involved mechanisms remain unclear. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to use human embryonic kidney cells (HEK293T) as a general cell model of mitochondrial damage, as well as, zebrafish larvae, and isolated proximal tubules of killifish to investigate factors promoting renal tubular toxicity of iopamidol with a focus on mitochondrial damage. Results from in vitro HEK293T cell-based assays indicate that iopamidol affects mitochondrial function Treatment with iopamidol induces ATP depletion, reduces the mitochondrial membrane potential, and elevates mitochondrial superoxide and reactive oxygen species accumulation. Similar results were obtained with gentamicin sulfate and cadmium chloride, two well-known model compounds associated with renal tubular toxicity. Confocal microscopy confirms changes in mitochondrial morphology, such as mitochondrial fission. Importantly, these results were confirmed in proximal renal tubular epithelial cells using ex vivo and in vivo teleost models. In conclusion, this study provides evidence for iopamidol-induced mitochondrial damage in proximal renal epithelial cells. Teleost models allow studying proximal tubular toxicity with translational relevance for humans.

Contrast Agent Selection to Prevent Recurrent Severe Hypersensitivity Reaction to Iodinated Contrast Media Based on Nationwide Database

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the incidence of severe iodinated contrast media (ICM)-related hypersensitivity reaction (HSR) and to find the optimal alternative ICM to reduce the risk of severe HSR recurrence.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 23,383,183 cases of ICM administration between January 2015 and December 2019 from the nationwide health insurance database. We classified ICMs based on generic profiles and the presence of N-(2,3-dihydroxypropyl) carbamoyl side chains. The incidence of severe and recurrent severe HSRs was calculated, and χ2 tests were performed to compare the prevalence of severe HSR according to ICM groups. In addition, logistic regression analyses were used to assess differences between ICM groups.

RESULTS

The incidence of severe HSRs was 1.92% (450,067 of 23,282,183). Among 1,875,245 individuals who received ICM twice on different days, severe HSR occurred in 40,850 individuals, and severe HSR recurred in 3319 individuals (8.12%). The risk of recurrence significantly decreased when the ICM changed (9.24% vs 7.08%, P < 0.001), especially when the ICM changed to one with a different side chain (6.74%, P < 0.001). In addition, compared with the reuse of the culprit agent, using combinations of iobitridol/iohexol (odds ratio [OR], 0.696; P = 0.04), iohexol/iopamidol (OR, 0.757; P = 0.007), iopamidol/iohexol (OR, 0.447; P < 0.001), and ioversol/iohexol (OR, 0.683; P = 0.04) reduced the risk of recurrence of severe HSR.

CONCLUSIONS

Changing the culprit ICM to that with a different side chain can reduce severe HSR recurrence. The optimal choice of an alternative ICM depends on the causative agent.

Differences in the Recurrence Rate of Immediate Adverse Drug Reactions According to the Components of Alternative Contrast Media: Analysis of Repetitive Computed Tomography Cases in a Single Tertiary Hospital

INTRODUCTION

The recurrence rates of immediate adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to the alternative radiocontrast media (RCM) are not well known. Previous studies suggest selection of alternative RCM considering carbamoyl side chains; however, its usefulness for preventing the recurrence of ADRs has not been clearly verified.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to verify the recurrence rate of immediate ADRs according to the alternative RCM.

METHOD

This retrospective study analyzed 6420 contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) cases of 2009 patients registered in the ADR system from 861,664 CT cases in a single tertiary hospital between 2015 and 2020. Iohexol, iopromide, iobitridol, and iopamidol were used for CT. According to the carbamoyl side chains present, iohexol belongs to group 1, iopromide belongs to groups 1 and 2, iobitridol belongs to group 2, and iopamidol belongs to group 3.

RESULTS

Replacing iobitridol with iopamidol (odds ratio [OR] 2.595, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48-4.550) or iopromide (OR 3.354, 95% CI 1.420-7.926) as the subsequent RCM was associated with increased recurrence, while replacing iopamidol with iobitridol (OR 0.506, 95% CI 0.282-0.908) and iopromide with iohexol (OR 0.355, 95% CI 0.177-0.711) was associated with decreased recurrence. Other changes did not influence the recurrence of ADRs.

CONCLUSIONS

The recurrence of immediate ADRs increased in certain RCM combinations of preceding and subsequent CT scans, and the RCMs did not show cross-reactivity. Therefore, the clinical benefit of the alternative RCM considering cross-reactivity is limited. This result suggests that the side chains of RCM do not have an important role in the recurrence of immediate ADRs.

Risk of Hypersensitivity Reactions to Iopromide in Children and Elderly: An Analysis of 132,850 Patients From 4 Observational Studies and Pharmacovigilance Covering >288 Million Administrations

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to analyze the risk of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to iopromide in children and elderly patients in comparison to adults.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four observational studies were pooled and analyzed (analysis I). In addition, spontaneous reports from 1985 to 2020 from the pharmacovigilance database were evaluated (analysis II). All patients received iopromide for angiographic procedures or contrast-enhanced computed tomography in various indications. In analysis I, a nested case-control analysis, including a multivariable logistic regression model, based on pooled observational study data, was performed. Cases were defined as patients with a typical and unequivocal HSR; controls were patients without any recorded reaction. In analysis II, all spontaneous reports on HSRs after iopromide administration recorded in the pharmacovigilance database were descriptively analyzed. Exposure estimates on the size of the exposed age groups were derived from sales data and data from market research. The primary target variable was the risk of HSR to iopromide in children (<18 years) and elderly patients (≥65 years) compared with adults (≥18 to <65 years).

RESULTS

In analysis I, a total of 132,850 patients were included (2978 children, 43,209 elderly, and 86,663 adults). Hypersensitivity reactions were significantly less frequent in children (0.47%) and elderly (0.38%) compared with adults (0.74%). The adjusted odds ratio (vs adults) for children was 0.58 (95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.98; P < 0.043), and that for the elderly was 0.51 (95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.61; P < 0.001), indicating a lower risk for both subpopulations as compared with adults. In analysis II, of the overall >288 million iopromide administrations, 5.87, 114.18, and 167.97 million administrations were administered to children, elderly, and adults, respectively. The reporting rate for HSRs in children (0.0114%) and elderly (0.0071%) was significantly lower as compared with adults (0.0143%) (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Hypersensitivity reactions to iopromide were significantly less frequent in children and elderly compared with adults.

Mas-Related G Protein–Coupled Receptor-X2 and Its Role in Non-immunoglobulin E–Mediated Drug Hypersensitivity

A diverse group of Food and Drug Administration-approved cationic drugs including antibiotics, neuromuscular blocking drugs, opioids, antidepressants, and radiocontrast media activate mast cells and cause hypersensitivity reactions by both an immunoglobulin E IgE-dependent and independent manner. The recent discovery that these drugs activate mast cells via the G protein-coupled receptor known as Mas-related GPCR-X2 (MRGPRX2) has represented a paradigm shift of how drug hypersensitivity reactions are viewed. This article provides an overview of the current status of the role of MRGPRX2 on non-IgE-mediated drug hypersensitivity. Potential risk factors and evaluation for suspected MRGPRX2-mediated drug reactions are also discussed.

Quantitative assessment of renal perfusion in children with UPJO by contrast enhanced ultrasound: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a new potential modality for the quantitative evaluation of the microvascular perfusion of a parenchymal organ.

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively and quantitatively analyse the role of CEUS in evaluating renal perfusion for assessing renal function in children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO).

METHODS

The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained from the patients' parents or guardians. Ultrasonography, CEUS, and radioisotope renography were performed for 51 children (42 boys, 9 girls; mean age, 6.75 ± 4.14 years) with unilateral UPJO. The slope of the ascending curve (A), time to peak (TTP), peak intensity (PI), and area under the curve (AUC) were recorded during CEUS; quantitative data were calculated by QLab system (semiautomated border tracking, Philips Healthcare) software. Sensitivity and specificity values were determined for CEUS with respect to radioisotope renography.

RESULTS

CEUS was used to evaluate 102 kidneys in 51 patients, for which the perfusion time-intensity curve (TIC) was determined. The TIC of renal cortical perfusion in all groups showed an asymmetrical single-peak curve, which could be clearly distinguished between the experimental group and the control group. Compared with the control group, the experimental group showed a markedly prolonged TTP but a significantly decreased A (P < 0.05). There was no significant correlation between the AUC, PI and differential renal function (DRF), but the correlation coefficient between TTP, A and DRF remained significant (p < 0.001).The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves drawn to differentiate DRF using the TTP value yielded an area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of 0.86. For a quantitative assessment of DRF less than 40% by CEUS, the sensitivity and specificity values were 92.86% and 76.14%, respectively.

DISCUSSION

Unlike in previous studies, no significant difference in the AUC or PI was found between the control group and the experimental group in this study (P > 0.05). Renal blood perfusion could not be evaluated overall by CEUS. Parenchymal thinning may be considered a limitation to CEUS.

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary experience represents the first report of evaluating the diagnostic value of CEUS in assessing renal function in children with UPJO. CEUS is a highly sensitive, rapid, and cost-effective diagnostic imaging modality for detecting and monitoring renal function noninvasively.

MRGPRX2 mediates immediate-type pseudo-allergic reactions induced by iodine-containing iohexol

BACKGROUND

Iohexol is a typical iodinated radiocontrast medium and widely used in clinical angiography. Hypersensitivity reactions induced by iohexol are common side effects known to increase the risk for patients. Iodine is the main functional group of iohexol, and it can induce delayed anaphylaxis. However, iohexol also induces immediate-type allergies, but the underlying mechanism is still not clear. MRGPRX2 is a key receptor present on mast cells, which mediates pseudo-allergic reactions induced by various drugs.

METHODS

We aimed to verify the relationship between iohexol-induced anaphylactic reactions and MRGPRX2. MRGPRX2-mediated pseudo-allergic reactions induced by iohexol were investigated in vivo and in vitro using a mouse model of local and systemic anaphylaxis and mast cell degranulation assays, respectively.

RESULTS

Iohexol caused pseudo-allergic reactions in wild-type (WT) mice by activating mast cells to release histamine and cytokines. However, it did not induce a similar phenomenon in Kit^W-sh/W-sh (MUT) mice. Iohexol stimulated intracellular calcium ion (Ca²⁺) influx in MRGPRX2-HEK293, MrgprB2-HEK293, and LAD2 cells but not in NC-HEK293 cells. After knockdown of MRGPRX2 expression in LAD2 cells, the degree of iohexol-induced degranulation was reduced. In addition, after structural modification of iohexol by removal of iodine, a reduction in iohexol-induced effects, such as local and systemic anaphylaxis in mice and degranulation of LAD2 cells, could be observed. Iohexol was shown to induce immediate-type pseudo-allergic reactions via MRGPRX2, which was dependent on the presence of iodine.

CONCLUSIONS

Conclusively, inhibition of MRGPRX2-mediated mast cell degranulation and cytokine release is important to prevent iohexol-induced immediate-type pseudo-allergic reactions.

Safety Analysis of Iobitridol as a Nonionic Contrast Medium: A Postmarketing Multicenter Surveillance Study With 94,960 Patients Almost 20 Years After Introduction

OBJECTIVES

Our study sought to reevaluate the safety and diagnostic efficacy of iobitridol as a nonionic contrast medium after almost 20 years of use.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This noninterventional postmarketing surveillance noncontrolled, multicenter (168 centers in Germany) study enrolled 94,960 patients receiving intravenous or intra-arterial iobitridol. The majority of the adjusted population (n = 92,550, 98.2%) underwent either computed tomography examination (n = 46,502, 49.3%) or intravenous urography (n = 46,048, 48.8%). A standardized questionnaire was used to ascertain patient's information, known risk factors, renal function status, premedication, type of examination, injection of contrast agent, imaging quality, diagnostic value, and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 469 patients (0.49%) experienced an adverse event (AE), and 24 patients (0.025%) reported a serious AE (SAE). All patients recovered and no fatal event occurred. The prevalence of AE was significantly higher in patients with at least one risk factor, with premedication, with a history of AE, in female and patients younger than 60 years old (P < 0.05). Presence of at least one risk factor is the only predictive factor for the prevalence of SAE (P = 0.042). In patients with a history of AE, premedication did not significantly lower the AE rate (P = 0.737). No statistically significant difference in the prevalence of AE between the different combination of cortisone and/or antihistamines as pretreatment was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Iobitridol is a safe contrast medium with a high tolerability and efficacy. Presence of risk factors such as cardiovascular diseases, allergies, or asthma was the only significant predictive factor for an AE and an SAE. Premedication did not significantly lower the occurrence of an AE and an SAE.

Risk of Hypersensitivity Reactions to Iopromide After Intra-Arterial Versus Intravenous Administration: A Nested Case-Control Analysis of 133,331 Patients

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the risk of hypersensitivity reactions to iopromide after intra-arterial (IA) administration and intravenous (IV) administration.

Materials and Methods

Four observational studies were pooled. Almost half of the study population (48.1%) was from Europe, and one quarter each from China (27.6%) and other Asia countries (24.1%). All patients received iopromide either intra-arterially or intravenously for angiographic procedures (mostly cardio-angiography) or contrast-enhanced computed tomography. A nested case-control analysis, including a multivariable logistic regression model, was performed. Cases were defined by patients with a typical and unequivocal hypersensitivity (assumed non–IgE-mediated) reaction; controls were patients without any recorded reaction. The primary target variable is the odds ratio of having a hypersensitivity reaction after IA versus IV administration.

Results

A total of 133,331 patients met the inclusion criteria, 105,460 and 27,871 patients received iopromide IV or IA, respectively. Hypersensitivity reactions were recorded for 822 patients, and 132,509 patients served as controls.

Major risk factors for hypersensitivity reactions were method of injection (IV vs IA), age (18 to <50 years vs ≥65 years), history of allergy or previous contrast media reaction (all P < 0.001), and asthma (P = 0.005).

A total of 766 patients (0.7%) and 56 patients (0.2%) were recorded with hypersensitivity reactions after IV or IA administration, respectively (P < 0.0001).

Adjusted odds ratio (IA vs IV) was 0.23 (95% confidence interval, 0.16–0.32) for all countries together: for China only, 0.22 (0.11–0.44); for all countries without China, 0.36 (0.25–0.53).

Most frequent reactions were erythema/urticaria/rash, pruritus, and cough/sneezing.

Conclusions

Hypersensitivity reactions to iopromide were significantly less frequently recorded after IA administrations. This could be related to the delayed and diluted arrival of iopromide to the lungs.

Incidence and Risk Factors of Nausea and Vomiting after Exposure to Low-Osmolality Iodinated Contrast Media in Children: A Focus on Preparative Fasting

Objective

To evaluate the incidence and risk factors of emetic complications associated with the intravenous administration of low-osmolality iodinated contrast media (ICM) in children undergoing computed tomography (CT).

Materials and Methods

All children who underwent contrast-enhanced CT between April 2017 and July 2019 were included. Pediatric patients were instructed on the preparative dietary protocol at our institution. Experienced nurses in the radiology department monitored the children during the CT scans and recorded any emetic complications in their electronic medical records. These data were used to calculate the incidence of emetic complications. Various patient factors and technical factors, including fasting duration, the type and volume of ICM, and ongoing chemotherapy, were evaluated to identify risk factors for emetic complications using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.

Results

Among the 864 children (mean age, 8.4 ± 5.7 years) evaluated, 18 (2.1%) experienced emetic complications (6 experienced nausea only and 12 experienced nausea and vomiting). None of the children developed aspiration pneumonia. The mean fasting duration of patients with emesis was 7.9 ± 5.7 hours (range, 3–21 hours), whereas that of patients without nausea was 8.7 ± 5.7 hours (range, 0–24 hours). Fasting duration was not associated with the development of nausea and vomiting (p = 0.634). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that ongoing chemotherapy (odds ratio [OR] = 4.323; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.430–13.064; p = 0.009), iomeprol use (OR = 7.219; 95% CI = 1.442–36.146; p = 0.016), and iohexol use (OR = 5.241; 95% CI = 1.350–20.346; p = 0.017) were independent risk factors for emetic complications.

Conclusion

Only a small proportion (2.1%) of children experienced nausea or vomiting after exposure to low-osmolality ICM. Many children underwent excessive fasting; however, fasting duration was not associated with nausea and vomiting. Moreover, ongoing chemotherapy and the use of iomeprol or iohexol were identified as potential risk factors for emetic complications in children.

Acute Adverse Reactions to Nonionic Iodinated Contrast Media: A Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to meta-analytically compare the incidence of acute adverse reactions (AARs) to nonionic iodinated contrast media (ICM) according to the type of ICM in patients who underwent radiologic examinations with administration of ICM via intravascular route.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature search identified studies evaluating the incidence of AARs to 7 nonionic ICM (iobitridol, iohexol, iomeprol, iopamidol, iopromide, ioversol, and iodixanol) with extractable outcomes. These outcomes were pooled using a random-effects model, and the effect of ICM type on the incidence of overall and severe AARs was evaluated using meta-regression analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty studies with 1,360,488 exposures to ICM were included. The pooled incidences of overall and severe AARs to nonionic ICM were 1.03% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81%-1.30%; I = 0.99) and 0.0141% (95% CI, 0.0108%-0.0183%; I = 0.56), respectively. Iomeprol had the highest overall AAR incidence (1.74%; 95% CI, 0.79%-3.76%; I = 0.99), followed by iohexol (1.21%; 95% CI, 0.67%-2.17%; I = 0.99), iopamidol (1.10%; 95% CI, 0.60%-2.03%; I = 0.99), ioversol (0.88%; 95% CI, 0.43%-1.83%; I = 0.96), iodixanol (0.85%; 95% CI, 0.36%-1.95%; I = 0.99), iopromide (0.82%; 95% CI, 0.43%-1.55%; I = 0.99), and iobitridol (0.77%; 95% CI, 0.36%-1.62%; I = 0.99). Multivariable meta-regression analysis revealed that study design (P = 0.0014) and premedication (P = 0.0230) were statistically significant determinants affecting the incidence of overall AARs. Iodinated contrast media type did not affect the incidence of overall and severe AARs (P = 0.1453 and 0.4265, each).

CONCLUSIONS

The varying pooled incidences of overall and severe AARs to specific types of nonionic ICM do not remain as significant after adjusting confounders. Our results may support nonrestriction of certain types of nonionic ICM in the context of AAR avoidance.

Can the lower rate of CT- or MRI-related adverse drug reactions to contrast media due to stricter limitations on patients undergoing contrast-enhanced CT or MRI?

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine whether a decreased occurrence rate of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to contrast media in contrast-enhanced CT and MRI was attributable to appropriate criteria for patients with some diseases. A secondary aim was to elucidate safety profiles for contrast media and factors influencing the occurrence of ADRs.

METHODS

Clinical data of patients who underwent contrast-enhanced CT (5576 cases) or MRI (3357 cases) were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate rates of ADRs to contrast media, symptoms of ADRs, treatments for ADRs, and differences in medical history, blood test results, and other factors between patients with and without ADRs in a dental hospital.

RESULTS

The rate of ADRs to contrast media was 0.54% for CT and 0.09% for MRI. The most frequent ADRs in contrast-enhanced CT or MRI were nausea and vomiting as physiologic reactions. Two serious reactions were seen for CT, but none for MRI. Significant differences between patients with and without ADRs were seen in liver function according to blood tests for CT, and in digestive disorders elicited from medical interviews for MRI.

CONCLUSION

The lower occurrence rate of ADRs to contrast media in dental hospitals could be due to the adoption of appropriate criteria for patients with some diseases undergoing enhanced CT or MRI. Complete suppression of ADRs to contrast media for CT or MRI is unrealistic, so attention is warranted for patients with decreased liver function when performing enhanced CT, and for patients with digestive disorders when performing enhanced MRI.

Contrast-Induced Encephalopathy Resulting From Use of Ioversol and Iopromide

BACKGROUND

Contrast-induced encephalopathy (CIE) is a rare disease, whose etiology and risk factors remain unclear and need investigation.

METHODS

We collected 7 CIE cases from 2646 patients injected with ioversol and 5 CIE cases from 526 patients injected with iopromide, all of whom underwent neurointervention surgery in our regional centers. The incidence of CIE, its characteristics, and risks were analyzed in both groups.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of CIE was 0.38%, specifically 0.95% and 0.26% in the iopromide and ioversol groups, respectively; the former incidence was significantly higher than the latter (P = 0.029). The risk of CIE with iopromide was 3.567 to 3.618 times higher than that with ioversol (single-factor analysis odds ratio [OR], 3.618; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.144-11.443; P = 0.029; multifactor analysis OR, 3.567 (95% CI, 0.827-15.379); P = 0.088). Moreover, acute cerebral infarction was an independent risk factor for CIE (OR, 4.024; 95% CI, 1.137-14.236; P = 0.031). Contrast-induced encephalopathy could occur within 5 minutes after injecting contrast media. The CIE characteristics differed according to the medium. In the ioversol group, the most common characteristic was visual disorder (71.43%), whereas in the iopromide group, the most common characteristic was delirium (100%).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with ioversol, iopromide appeared more likely to lead to CIE. Acute cerebral infarction was an independent risk factor for CIE. The earliest CIE onset was within 5 minutes after injecting contrast. The characteristics of CIE varied significantly for different contrast media.

Developments in the field of allergy in 2017 through the eyes of Clinical and Experimental Allergy

In this article, we described the development in the field of allergy as described by Clinical and Experimental Allergy in 2017. Experimental models of allergic disease, basic mechanisms, clinical mechanisms, allergens, asthma and rhinitis and clinical allergy are all covered.

Intradermal Testing With Radiocontrast Media to Prevent Recurrent Adverse Reactions

OBJECTIVE. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to radiocontrast media are a significant social and economic burden and are difficult to predict. Because some ADRs to radiocontrast media may be immunologically induced, a skin test with diluted 1:10 radiocontrast media has been used to predict ADRs. However, using this test in clinical practice is difficult because of its low sensitivity. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. This study enrolled 36 patients with a history of immediate ADR to radiocontrast media who visited the Allergy and Asthma Clinic of Severance Hospital from 2017 to 2018. Patients underwent intradermal testing (IDT) with five types of diluted (1:10) and undiluted radiocontrast media (iohexol, iobitridol, iopamidol, iopromide, and iodixanol). The IDT result was regarded as positive if at least one radiocontrast medium elicited a positive reaction. Positivity of IDT and sensitivity to the culprit radiocontrast medium were calculated and compared. For subsequent CT examinations with a radiocontrast medium, the contrast agent eliciting a negative skin reaction in IDT was selected, excluding the previous culprit radiocontrast medium. RESULTS. IDT positivity and sensitivity for the culprit radiocontrast medium at 1:10 dilution were 47.2% and 47.2%, respectively, whereas the positivity and sensitivity for the undiluted radiocontrast medium were 86.1% and 75.0%, respectively. The positivity and sensitivity were higher with frequent radiocontrast medium use or with severe reaction. Of 22 patients who underwent another CT examination with the contrast medium selected on the basis of IDT results, 21 (95.5%) did not experience an ADR. CONCLUSION. IDT to prevent ADR should be performed with undiluted radiocontrast medium. Selecting an alternative radiocontrast agent on the basis of IDT results can be clinically useful to prevent recurrent ADRs to radiocontrast media.

A mast-cell-specific receptor mediates Iopamidol induced immediate IgE-independent anaphylactoid reactions

Iopamidol is a radiographic contrast media which caused a very high incidence of anaphylactic reactions. Mast cells are sentinel cells in host defense reactions during immediate hypersensitivity responses and anaphylactic responses. Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor X2 (MRGPRX2) is a kind of mast cell specific receptor, which triggers mast cell degranulation in anaphylactic reactions. Mice MrgprB2 is a homologous gene of MRGPRX2. We sought to better understand the anaphylactic reactions induced by Iopamidol and the mechanisms involving MRGPRX2. The MRGPRX2-related anaphylactic reactions induced by Iopamidol were investigated using the hindpaw swelling and extravasation assay in vivo and a calcium imaging assay was used for mast cell intracellular calcium responses detection and mast cell release of anaphylactic mediators, such as β-hexosaminidase, histamine and TNF-α, was also detected in vitro. The mast cell deficient Kit^W-sh/W-sh mice and MrgprB2 knockout mice exhibited a reduced Iopamidol-induced inflammation effect compared with wild type mice. Furthermore, human mast cells that express MRGPRX2 were activated by Iopamidol in a dose-dependent manner, meanwhile MRGPRX2 knockdown mast cells showed reduced intracellular calcium responses and anaphylactic mediators release effect. It could be concluded that Iopamidol-induced anaphylactoid reactions were MRGPRX2 mediated to provoke mast cells Ca²⁺ mobilization and degranulation.

Differences in Adverse Reactions Among Iodinated Contrast Media: Analysis of the KAERS Database

BACKGROUND

The various adverse drug reactions (ADRs) arise from different types of iodinated contrast media (ICM).

OBJECTIVE

Thus, we investigated the occurrence rate and types of ADRs according to the total usage cases of the 7 most common ICM.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 74,242 causal ADRs caused by ICM from the Korea Adverse Event Reporting System database between January 2014 and December 2016. The 11,712,796 total usage cases that represent all administrations of ICM reported from individual medical institutions were received from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. A proportionality test was used to examine the differences in the frequency ratio of causal ADRs to total usage cases.

RESULTS

Immediate hypersensitivity (44,467 cases, 88.56%) occurred more frequently than delayed hypersensitivity (5,725 cases, 11.4%; P < .001). The overall occurrence rate of causal ADRs and serious ADRs considering total usage cases was 0.37% and 0.02%, respectively (P < .001). The ICM most commonly resulting in ADRs were iomeprol (0.7%) and iopromide (0.59%). The serious ADRs were most common for iomeprol (0.05%). When ADRs were classified according to the system organ class, "skin and appendages disorders" (47,065 cases, 63.4%) occurred most common. Iodixanol resulted in the highest frequency of "urinary system disorders."

CONCLUSIONS

By comparison of the ADRs considering total usage cases, the incidence and classification of ADRs were different for each contrast medium. A prospective study is needed because the differences in these 7 major contrast media may assist in the selection of ICM tailored for each patient.

The incidence of skin lesions in contrast media-induced chemical hypersensitivity

Contrast agents are used in radiology to increase the sensibility and specificity of radiological techniques. Some of these compounds have side effects that include organ toxicity (with kidney being the most affected organ) and hypersensitivity reactions. We performed multiple PubMed searches from January, 2008 to January, 2018 for studies regarding adverse reactions to compounds used as contrast agents in imagistic techniques. The initial research identified 929 records written in English. After further excluding 223 non-human studies, 292 articles that had irrelevant designs as reviews, meta-analysis, commentaries, editorials and case reports, 414 studies were selected for retrieval. After reading the abstracts, we excluded 363 studies as they had little relevance to the study. In total, 51 full-articles were assessed for eligible studies to be included. Finally, 20 articles were included in the analysis. In our systematic literature search the incidence of overall skin immediate reactions to iodinated contrast media (ICM) had an incidence between 1.15 and 0.12%, depending on the cohort analyzed in the studies. The percentage of cutaneous manifestations in the cohort that experienced immediate hypersensitivity reactions was between 33.33 and 87.7%. The most frequent skin manifestations were urticaria, rashes, pruritus and limited facial edema. Non-iodinated contrast agents have a safer profile compared with ICM, the incidence of immediate adverse reactions being very low in gadolinium-based contrast agents and other agents used for contrast-enhanced ultrasound. The incidence of delayed reactions was between 10.1 and 0.03%. In the studies analyzed by us the main adverse reactions due to delayed hypersensitivity phenomena were cutaneous manifestations that were present between 70.27 and 100% of the cases. Regarding the risk factors for developing immediate adverse reactions, being female was a predisposing factor accompanied by history of allergy and history of reactions to contrast media. An accurate anamnesis of the patients and a correctly conducted pretreatment can limit the incidence and the severity of the adverse reactions and also can avoid the life occurrence of life-threatening reactions.

Drug-induced anaphylaxis: is it an epidemic?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The present review addresses the epidemiology, analyzes the current data and promotes global awareness of drug-induced anaphylaxis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Anaphylaxis is a medical emergency that may cause death! In the last decade, studies have shown an increasing incidence and prevalence of anaphylaxis.

SUMMARY

Drug-induced anaphylaxis fatalities have increased, and this syndrome remains underdiagnosed and undertreated.

Nausea and vomiting after exposure to non-ionic contrast media: incidence and risk factors focusing on preparatory fasting

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively evaluate the incidence of nausea and vomiting after exposure to non-ionic iodinated contrast media (ICM), and to identify potential risk factors, with a focus on fasting duration for solid food and fluids, separately.

METHODS

From January to March 2017, 1175 patients (605 males, 570 females; median age, 60 years; range, 20-91 years) undergoing ICM-enhanced CT were included in this study. Patients received instructions for a 6 h preparatory fast from solid food. Nausea and vomiting after ICM exposure were assessed on a 3-point scale (mild, moderate, severe). Patients' characteristics and the fasting duration were evaluated to identify risk factors using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 1175 patients, 34 [2.9%; 95% confidence interval (CI) (2.0-4.0)] experienced mild nausea. No patients experienced vomiting [95% CI (0.0000-0.0005)]. 1173 (99.8%) carried out a 6 h fast, and the median fasting durations were 14 h for solid food (interquartile range, 12.5-15.5 h) and 11 h for fluid (interquartile range, 0-13.5 h), respectively. Fasting durations for solid food and fluids were not associated with nausea on univariate regression analyses (p = 0.282-1.000 and  0.146-1.000, respectively). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that a history of drug hypersensitivity [odds ratio = 4.33; 95% CI (1.85-17.52); p = 0.039] was independent risk factors for nausea, whereas iobitridol was less nauseous [odds ratio = 0.32; 95% CI (0.11-0.90); p = 0.032].

CONCLUSION

Mild nausea occurred in 2.9% of patients and none vomited in our study population with a 6 h preparatory fast from solid food. Many patients underwent excessive fasting for fluids as well as solid food and their fasting durations were not associated with nausea. Advances in knowledge: We firstly evaluated fasting durations for solid food and fluids, and their impacts on vomiting or nausea after ICM exposure with an instruction of 6 h preparatory fast for solid food: many patients underwent excessive fasting for fluids and the fasting duration was unrelated to nausea.

Safety of Iohexol Administration to Measure Glomerular Filtration Rate in Different Patient Populations: A 25-Year Experience

<b><i>Background/Aim:</i></b> In clinical research setting, accurate and precise measurement of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is essential to overcome the limitations of GFR estimation with equations, which are often unreliable. In recent decades, a method for measuring GFR by plasma clearance of iohexol, a non-ionic radiocontrast agent, was developed. To evaluate the safety of the procedure, we aimed to review all immediate adverse reactions that could be related to iohexol administration in our group’s 25 years worth of experience. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We retrospectively reviewed all GFR investigations in 2,891 patients, between 1992 and 2016, as part of 37 clinical trials coordinated by our group. Subjects with disparate renal diseases, kidney transplant recipients, and living donors – all with different renal function categories – were included in the surveyed clinical trials. <b><i>Results:</i></b> During 15,147 GFR measurements, only one treatment-related event of moderate intensity was identified. Flushing, urticaria, and itching were observed in a diabetic patient a few minutes after iohexol administration during the first GFR measurement. The event recovered without sequelae after intravenous injection of methylprednisolone sodium succinate. The patient was not hospitalized and the event was categorized as non-serious. Eight additional non-serious events observed closely following iohexol injection were considered as not related to treatment. Thus, independent of disease conditions and GFR categories, the overall rate of treatment-related events was 0.0066%. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Iohexol administration for GFR measurement is a safe procedure, even in repeated investigations in the same subject, that should be adopted in clinical research and, when needed, also in clinical practice.

Drug-induced anaphylaxis in China: a 10 year retrospective analysis of the Beijing Pharmacovigilance Database

Background Few studies on the causes of drug-induced anaphylaxis (DIA) in the hospital setting are available. Objective We aimed to use the Beijing Pharmacovigilance Database (BPD) to identify the causes of DIA in Beijing, China. Setting Anaphylactic case reports from the BPD provided by the Beijing Center for Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring. Method DIA cases collected by the BPD from January 2004 to December 2014 were adjudicated. Cases were analyzed for demographics, causative drugs and route of administration, and clinical signs and outcomes. Main outcome measure Drugs implicated in DIAs were identified and the signs and symptoms of the DIA cases were analyzed. Results A total of 1189 DIA cases were analyzed. The mean age was 47.6 years, and 732 (61.6%) were aged from 18 to 59 years. A total of 627 patients (52.7%) were females. There was a predominance of cardiovascular (83.8%) followed by respiratory (55.4%), central nervous (50.1%), mucocutaneous (47.4%), and gastrointestinal symptoms (31.3%). A total of 249 different drugs were involved. DIAs were mainly caused by antibiotics (39.3%), traditional Chinese medicines (TCM) (11.9%), radiocontrast agents (11.9%), and antineoplastic agents (10.3%). Cephalosporins accounted for majority (34.5%) of antibiotic-induced anaphylaxis, followed by fluoroquinolones (29.6%), beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors (15.4%) and penicillins (7.9%). Blood products and biological agents (3.1%), and plasma substitutes (2.1%) were also important contributors to DIAs. Conclusion A variety of drug classes were implicated in DIAs. Patients should be closely monitored for signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis when medications are administered especially with antibiotics, TCM, radiocontrast and antineoplastic agents.

Comparison of Thoracic Radiography and Computed Tomography in Calves with Naturally Occurring Respiratory Disease

Objective

To evaluate the severity and extent of lung disease using thoracic computed radiography (CR) compared to contrast-enhanced multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) of the thorax in calves with naturally occurring respiratory disease and to evaluate the feasibility and safety of performing contrast-enhanced thoracic multi-detector MDCT examinations in sedated calves. Furthermore, to evaluate if combining CR or MDCT with respiratory scoring factors will improve prediction of the chronicity of pulmonary disease in calves.

Animals

Thirty Jersey heifer calves ranging in age between 25 and 89 days with naturally occurring respiratory disease.

Procedures

All calves were evaluated via thoracic CR and contrast-enhanced MDCT. All calves were euthanized immediately following thoracic MDCT and submitted for necropsy. Imaging and histopathology results were compared with each other.

Results

Thoracic MDCT was superior for evaluation of pneumonia in calves due to the lack of summation in all areas of the lungs. Intravenously administered sedation provided an adequate plane of sedation for acquiring MDCT images of diagnostic quality, without the need for re-scanning. A diagnosis of pneumonia was made with equal rate on both thoracic CR and MDCT. Although mild differences in classification of lung pattern and extent of lung disease were seen when comparing an experienced and a less experienced evaluator, the overall differences were not statistically significant. The best intra- and inter-observer agreement was noted when evaluating the cranioventral aspects of the lungs in either modality. Clinical respiratory scoring is inadequate for diagnosing chronicity of pneumonia in calves with naturally occurring pneumonia.

Conclusion and clinical importance

Both imaging modalities allowed diagnosis of pneumonia in calves. The cranial ventral aspects of the lungs were most commonly affected. Thoracic CR and MDCT provided similar diagnostic effectiveness in diagnosing pneumonia. However, MDCT provided better assessment of subtle details, which may be otherwise obscured due to summation artifact.