Successful treatment of refractory palmoplantar pustulosis with apremilast

Apremilast or Methotrexate: The Arrows in the Quiver for Psoriasis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In the Indian subcontinent, psoriasis cases have skyrocketed in the last decade. Dry and hot weather aggrandizes the annual incidences. Nowadays, dermatologists harness methotrexate and apremilast to manage chronic plaque psoriasis. There needs to be more comparative studies on these drugs. The primary objective was change in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at six months from the baseline. Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at six months from the baseline and incidences of adverse events served as the secondary objectives.

METHODS

This randomized, open-label, 24-week study was executed in Srirama Chandra Bhanja (SCB) Medical College, Cuttack, India, from June 2021 to October 2022. The participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive tablets of either methotrexate 10-15mg weekly once or apremilast 10-30mg twice daily. Efficacy and safety analyses were performed at baseline, eight, 16, and 24 weeks. We used R software (version 4.1.1; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) for data analysis.

RESULTS

Seventy (82.3%) of 85 enrolled participants completed the study. The mean age of the study population was 41.08±5.17 years. Twenty-two (31.4%) of them were females. The median change in PASI from baseline was -37.25 (-39.00 to -34.25) for apremilast and -34.75 (-37.75 to -31.75) for methotrexate (p=0.006). The median change in DLQI from baseline was -19.50 (-22.00 to -17.00) for apremilast and -21.00 (-25.50 to -17.50) for methotrexate (p=0.079). No serious adverse events were noticed.

CONCLUSION

Apremilast was more effective than methotrexate in psoriasis treatment. The statistically significant difference was found only in PASI scores.

Apremilast monotherapy for palmoplantar pustulosis: Report of three cases

Palmoplantar pustulosis or palmoplantar pustular psoriasis is chronic skin conditions, characterised by eruptions of sterile pustules on an erythematosquamous background. High-quality data on the treatment of palmoplantar pustulosis are limited, and none is accepted as being effective in general. Apremilast is a small molecule inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 4 approved for the treatment of plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. We report three cases of palmoplantar pustulosis treated with apremilast monotherapy. Our three cases, as well as previous reports, demonstrate the potential for apremilast to be beneficial for a subset of patients with palmoplantar pustulosis or palmoplantar pustular psoriasis.

The Use of Apremilast in Psoriasis: An Indian Perspective on Real-World Scenarios

Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, is approved for use in the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Although its efficacy and safety have been well established in clinical studies, in real-world settings, different practice scenarios have been reported. This review paper serves to evaluate clinical real-world scenarios and aspects of treatment for which the information in the literature was considered to be lacking or controversial. Following a literature review, a panel of five dermatologists with expertise in psoriasis considered five scenarios; namely, the positioning of apremilast in psoriasis, its use in difficult-to-treat areas, special conditions and populations, safety, dose titration and dose in maintenance therapy. These were then assessed with psoriasis experts in India using a web-based questionnaire. A total of 28 questions were discussed regarding these scenarios. According to the responses, apremilast is effective in stable mild to moderate psoriasis as monotherapy and in severe psoriasis in combination. Also, a positive response was received with regard to its effectiveness in difficult locations such as the scalp, palms and soles. To reduce adverse effects, prolonged titration therapy over 4 weeks is required and lower doses can be prescribed to maintain remission. Apremilast therapy should be continued for a minimum of 8 weeks once initiated to achieve the desired results, and the total duration of therapy should be about 24 weeks for better efficacy. It is also effective in many other cases, such as obese patients, patients with hepatitis B or C and HIV, or patients on polypharmacy. It was also reported that apremilast requires less prescreening and monitoring than other conventional and biologic systemic therapies. Overall, apremilast is an attractive option for the individualized treatment of psoriasis owing to its favorable safety profile, its ease of oral administration without the need for screening or ongoing laboratory monitoring, and its positive impact on symptoms and lesions in difficult-to-treat areas.

A multicentre open-label study of apremilast in palmoplantar pustulosis (APLANTUS)

BACKGROUND

Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a chronic skin disease with painful erythematous scaly or crusty lesions and pustules on the palms and soles. Apremilast is a phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor that has proven effective in the therapy of psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis and in oral ulcers associated with Behcet's disease.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the efficacy of apremilast in PPP.

METHODS

APLANTUS was a phase 2 single-arm multicentre study of apremilast in 21 subjects with moderate-to-severe PPP. Primary endpoint was the per cent change of the Palmoplantar Pustulosis Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PPPASI) at week 20 compared to baseline.

RESULTS

20 weeks of oral treatment with apremilast in patients with moderate-to-severe PPP resulted in a significant decrease of the PPPASI with a median reduction of 57.1% (p < 0.001), and 61.9% of patients achieved at least a 50% improvement of the PPPASI relative to baseline. The total number of pustules per patient decreased significantly relative to baseline with 76.2% of patients achieving at least a 50% reduction in total pustules count at week 20. Improvement of PPP was also apparent in a significant decrease of the dermatologic life quality index (DLQI). The median DLQI score dropped from 8.5 at baseline to 2.0 at week 20 (p = 0.030). Apremilast was generally well tolerated, and no serious adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with PPP treated with apremilast showed benefit both in objective and subjective disease parameters. Apremilast should be investigated further in this difficult-to-treat skin condition. EudraCT number: 2016-005122-11.

[Apremilast in the treatment of palmoplantar pustulosis : A case series]

This is a case series of 8 patients with palmoplantar pustulosis. These patients were treated with the phosphodiesterase‑4 inhibitor apremilast at our psoriasis outpatient clinic at the dermatological department of the University Hospital Innsbruck and we compared and documented the clinical response using an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score over several months. This disease is characterized by its strong negative impact on the quality of life in affected patients, and by its resistance to therapy and its high relapse rate. Therapy options are relatively rare or off label. Apremilast is a safe and effective therapeutic approach in palmoplantar pustulosis.

Immediate response to apremilast in patients with palmoplantar pustulosis: a retrospective pilot study

Background

Recent case reports have shown the efficacy of apremilast for the treatment of palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP). However, no study has statistically analyzed the clinical efficacy of oral apremilast in patients with PPP.

Objectives

To evaluate the effectiveness of apremilast, a phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, for PPP.

Materials and Methods

Among 13 patients who were diagnosed with PPP, 10 patients with PPP with either palmoplantar pustules (>1 mm diameter) or sternoclavicular joint pain were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

Palmoplantar Pustulosis Area and Severity Index (mean ± SD: baseline, 13.4 ± 9.5 vs. after treatment, 5.1 ± 5.6; P = 0.013) and the number of pustules measuring > 1 mm in diameter (3.9 ± 3.9 vs. 1.3 ± 1.9; P = 0.029) significantly improved in 2 (±1) weeks. Moreover, the Dermatology Life Quality Index (9.7 ± 7.0 vs. 3.3 ± 3.6; P = 0.009) and palmoplantar itching (visual analog scale [VAS] score) (5.6 ± 3.5 vs. 2.1 ± 2.2; P = 0.026) significantly improved in 2 weeks, whereas VAS scores of palmoplantar pain (4.8 ± 4.4 vs. 1.1 ± 2.4; P = 0.081) and sternoclavicular joint pain (3.2 ± 3.8 vs. 2.0 ± 2.6; P = 0.194) did not significantly improve. Diarrhea was observed in 60.0% of our patients.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated that apremilast can effectively treat cutaneous manifestations and arthralgia in Japanese patients with PPP who had apparent pustules and/or clavicular‐sternocostal arthralgia. Owing to the retrospective design of the study and a small sample size, placebo‐controlled clinical trials with a larger number of patients are warranted to confirm the efficacy of apremilast for treatment of PPP.

Pharmacological Management of Pediatric Pustular Psoriasis

Therapeutic management of pustular psoriasis remains a challenge despite the rapid advance in psoriasis research and the development of drugs, especially biologics. Treatment guidelines have been established for pustular psoriasis, but no controlled studies are present for juvenile pustular psoriasis (JPP). Search of the literature reveals that current evidence of JPP treatment is limited to case reports and case series. Among the conventional drugs for JPP, oral retinoid is the most commonly used, yet concerns for growth disturbance exist. Cyclosporine and methotrexate have also been administered as first-line treatment. Etanercept is the first biological agent approved for juvenile plaque psoriasis, followed by adalimumab. However, infliximab is usually recommended for JPP because of the rapidity of onset, despite not being approved for use in pediatric psoriasis patients. More recently, secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, guselkumab, and risankizumab have been approved for adult pustular psoriasis in selected countries. Controlled studies are needed to prove the efficacy and long-term safety of the therapeutic treatments currently used for JPP.

Palmoplantar Pustulosis: Recent Advances in Etiopathogenesis and Emerging Treatments

Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a chronic, recurrent skin disease belonging to the spectrum of psoriasis. It is characterized by an eruption of sterile pustules on the palms and soles. Recent studies in PPP have focused on genetic differences between pustular phenotypes and the role of the innate immunological system and the microbiome in the etiopathogenesis of the disease. Mutations in IL36RN (a major predisposing factor for generalized pustular psoriasis) were found in selected patients with PPP and were associated with earlier disease onset. Studies have shown that the interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-36 pathways might be involved in the pathogenesis of PPP. A microbiome has been demonstrated in the vesicopustules of PPP, and an abundance of Staphylococcus appears to be increased by smoking. Improved understanding of the underlying etiopathogenesis of PPP has led to advances in treatment options, and targeted therapies for PPP have been evaluated or are under evaluation against more than 12 molecules in ongoing clinical trials. These targets include CXCR2 (IL-8 receptor type B), granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor, IL-1 receptor, IL-8, IL-12, IL-23, IL-17A, IL-17 receptor, IL-36 receptor, phosphodiesterase-4, and tumor necrosis factor-α.

Guselkumab for the treatment of palmoplantar pustulosis

INTRODUCTION

Palmoplantar pustulosis, or pustulosis palmaris et plantaris (PPP), is a chronic, recurrent inflammatory skin disease that is sometimes unresponsive to conventional therapy. The anti-interleukin 23 antibody guselkumab is effective for treating PPP.

AREAS COVERED

This review details the current understanding of PPP and discusses why guselkumab may be effective. Guselkumab is only approved for the treatment of PPP in Japan. In the United States, Canada, the European Union, and several other countries, it is approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, but not for PPP. Furthermore, guselkumab was approved only 1 year ago; its efficacy will be proven only by phase 2 and 3 clinical trials.

EXPERT OPINION

The first double-blinded randomized placebo-controlled trial (RCT) of guselkumab for PPP has been completed. The drug was effective, and guselkumab could be used as a new agent for PPP treatment, in addition to several conventional therapeutics. However, several issues remain. For example, there is no mouse model of PPP, so careful observation of human PPP patients and establishment of a good experimental PPP model are essential.

Refractory palmoplantar pustulosis succesfully treated with apremilast

Palmoplantar pustulosis is a chronic inflammatory disease which characterized by a eruption of sterile pustules on the palms and soles. Apremilast is an oral phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor which is approved for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. However, no clinical trial has been performed to confirm the efficacy of apremilast for palmoplantar pustulosis yet. Moreover, there are very few cases of this disease treated with apremilast. Herein, we describe a case of a refractory palmoplantar pustulosis succesfully treated with apremilast.

Off-label studies on apremilast in dermatology: a review

Purpose: Apremilast is a phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor FDA approved for psoriatic arthritis and moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. In recent years, multiple studies have suggested other potential uses for apremilast in dermatology. A summary of these various studies will be a valuable aid to dermatologists considering apremilast for an alternative indication.Materials and methods: The PubMed/MEDLINE and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were queried with the term 'apremilast,' with results manually screened to identify published data on off-label uses of apremilast. The article was structured by the quality of evidence available.Results: Apremilast use in dermatology beyond plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis is frequently described in the literature, with a mixture of positive and negative results. Randomized controlled data is available for Behçet's disease, hidradenitis suppurativa, nail/scalp/palmoplantar psoriasis, alopecia areata, and atopic dermatitis.Conclusion: The relatively safe adverse effect profile of apremilast and its broad immunomodulatory characteristics may make it a promising option in the future for patients with difficult to treat diseases in dermatology, refractory to first line therapies, but further studies will be necessary to clarify its role.

Apremilast in Psoriasis and Beyond: Big Hopes on a Small Molecule

Apremilast, an orally administered small molecule inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4), has been licensed by the US Food and Drug Administration for the management of active psoriatic arthritis (March 21, 2014) and moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (September 23, 2014). It has got approval from Drug Controller General of India for marketing in India in 2017. The drug has drawn much attention from the practising dermatologists for its commendable safety profile and prescription convenience. Introduced initially as an orally administered small molecule in psoriasis patients, the drug has now been used in various other indications as evident by the recent surge in literature for its off-label uses. Being a relatively new drug in the treatment armamentarium of psoriasis and other inflammatory dermatoses; in this review, we will discuss various practical aspects of prescribing oral apremilast, based on the current and emerging literature.

Pharmacotherapeutic approaches for treating psoriasis in difficult-to-treat areas

INTRODUCTION

Despite great therapeutic advancements in psoriasis, four notable difficult-to-treat areas including the scalp, nails, intertriginous (including genitals), and palmoplantar regions, pose a challenge to both physicians and patients. Localized disease of these specific body regions inflicts a significant burden on patients' quality of life and requires an adequate selection of treatments.

AREAS COVERED

This manuscript discusses appropriate therapies and important treatment considerations for these difficult-to-treat areas based on the available clinical data from the literature.

EXPERT OPINION

Clinical trials assessing therapies for the difficult-to-treat areas have been inadequate. With the first biological clinical trial for genital psoriasis pending publication, it is with hope that other biological agents will be evaluated for region-specific psoriasis. A greater understanding of the genetic and immunologic aspects of regional psoriasis, as well as identification of unique biomarkers, will further guide management decisions. For example, the recent discovery of the IL-36 receptor gene for generalized pustular psoriasis may prove valuable for other forms of psoriasis. Ultimately, identification of the most beneficial treatments for each psoriasis subtype and difficult-to-treat area will provide patients with maximal quality of life.

Apremilast: A Novel Oral Treatment for Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis

Psoriasis is a chronic immune-mediated disease associated with several co-morbidities and negative impacts on a patient's quality of life. Despite the advances in biologic therapy, there are still unmet needs in the treatment of psoriasis, as current treatments are limited in terms of long-term efficacy, tolerability, safety, route of administration, and cost. Apremilast is an oral, small-molecule phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor that works intracellularly by blocking the degradation of cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate, resulting in increased intracellular cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate levels in phosphodiesterase 4-expressing cells. This inhibition results in the reduced expression of proinflammatory mediators, and an increased expression of anti-inflammatory mediators, providing apremilast with an anti-inflammatory rather than immunosuppressive mode of action. Apremilast offers a novel therapeutic option for patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis and may fulfill some of the unmet needs in patients with psoriasis. Potential advantages of apremilast include moderate activity for both psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis and efficacy in difficult-to-treat forms of psoriasis, a good safety profile, no need of laboratory prescreening or ongoing monitoring for laboratory parameters, owing to the absence of organ toxicity, a potentially advantageous weight loss effect, and a convenient oral administration and dosing. Cost effectiveness and health economics considerations will be decisive in determining the ultimate place of apremilast in the therapeutic armamentarium for psoriasis.