Sporadic Blau syndrome treated with adalimumab

Management of Blau syndrome: review and proposal of a treatment algorithm

Blau syndrome is a rare genetic granulomatosis affecting children. It could be responsible for vision-threatening complications and articular deformation. Due to the rarity of this disease, there are no standardized guidelines for its management. This work aimed to provide an updated overview of the different therapeutic options for Blau syndrome. We conducted research in the PubMed database for the different treatments used in Blau syndrome patients, and we proposed a therapeutic algorithm for disease management. High doses of corticosteroids are considered as a bridging therapy in Blau syndrome. Methotrexate should be initiated if the patient has articular or ocular involvement. An anti-tumor necrosis factor α should be added for patients with uveitis or residual arthritis. If the patient remains symptomatic, a switch to another anti-tumor necrosis factor α is the best option. In non-responders to the first- and second-line biotherapies, a switch to an anti-interleukin 1, an anti-interleukin 6, or tofacitinib is necessary.

CONCLUSION

This article suggested an algorithm for the treatment of Blau syndrome. Other studies are necessary to confirm the efficacy of these treatments.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• Blau syndrome is a rare but severe granulomatosis that could be responsible for vision-threatening complications and articular deformation. • Blau syndrome seems to be refractory to treatments.

WHAT IS NEW

• High doses of corticosteroids are usually insufficient and should be considered only as a bridging therapy. • Blau syndrome could be considered as a poor factor for uveitis, thus, an anti-tumor necrosis factor α should be initiated for patients with uveitis or with residual arthritis.

Biologic Therapies for the Management of Cutaneous Findings in Genodermatoses: A Review

Genodermatoses are genetically inherited dermatologic conditions. The management of cutaneous findings in genodermatoses is challenging, and first-line therapies, such as steroids and/or retinoids, are often inadequate. In recent years, research on the molecular basis of genodermatoses has led to the use of biologic therapies for intractable disease. Here, we review the evidence regarding the use of available biologic therapies for the management of dermatologic findings in genodermatoses. Biologic therapies appear to be promising therapeutic options for several recalcitrant genodermatoses, especially those with underlying immune dysregulation. However, not all genodermatoses are amenable to biologic therapies, and some have been shown to paradoxically worsen under treatment. Biologic therapies offer a novel avenue to target refractory genodermatoses. However, evidence supporting the use of biologic therapies in the management of genodermatoses is mostly limited to case reports and case series. Further studies are warranted to determine the safety and efficacy of biologic therapies for the management of cutaneous findings in genodermatoses.

Ocular involvement in monogenic autoinflammatory disease

OBJECTIVE

Monogenic Autoinflammatory diseases (AIDs) are a broad spectrum of rare hereditary diseases whose ocular involvement has not been well characterized yet. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of the current knowledge about ocular findings in AIDs.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted using 2 electronic databases, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A combination of AIDs and ophthalmology-related search terms were used. All articles were screened by 2 independent reviewers for title, abstract and full text level. We included solely studies that investigated ocular findings in AIDs.

RESULTS

198 papers of 4268 records were retained. Data about 1353 patients with a diagnosis of autoinflammatory disease and ocular involvement were collected (680 CAPS, 211 FMF, 138 TRAPS, 238 Blau, 32 MKD, 21 SIFD, 7 Aicardi Goutières, 3 CANDLE, 8 DADA2, 9 HA20, 6 APLAID). Conjunctivitis was significantly more frequent in CAPS (p < 0.00001), uveitis in Blau, MKD, HA20 and CANDLE (p < 0.00001), papillitis/papilledema in CAPS (p < 0.00001), optic neuritis in Aicardi and DADA2 (p < 0.008), retinal vasculitis in FMF (p < 0.00001), progressive reduction in choroidal thickness in FMF and DADA2 (p < 0.00001), periorbital oedema in TRAPS (p < 0.00001) and retinitis in SIFD (p < 0.00001). Among AIDs with uveitis, granulomatous inflammation was more common in Blau syndrome (p < 0.00001).

CONCLUSION

This systematic literature review characterized the ocular involvement of several AIDs, and the present data may encourage to consider a timely ophthalmological screening program for these rare diseases.

Autoinflammatory syndromes

Autoinflammatory syndromes are a steadily growing group of inflammatory diseases caused by abnormal regulations of the innate immune system. The clinical presentation is multifaceted, but recurrent fever, skin involvement, joint inflammation and other systemic symptoms of inflammation are characteristic. In contrast to classic autoimmune diseases, autoantibodies or specific T cells are not involved in the pathogenesis. In fact, innate immunity plays the most important role in autoinflammation. While activation of the innate immune system is usually self-limiting in healthy individuals, mutations and dysregulation can lead to chronic and excessive activation of innate immune responses and to the development of autoinflammatory diseases.

Distinguishing Blau Syndrome from Systemic Sarcoidosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to provide a framework to distinguish Blau syndrome/Early Onset Sarcoidosis and Sarcoidosis clinically. We also discuss relevant differences in genetics, pathogenesis, and management of these diseases.

RECENT FINDINGS

Blau syndrome and Sarcoidosis share the characteristic histologic finding of noncaseating granulomas as well as some similar clinical characteristics; nevertheless, they are distinct entities with important differences between them. Blau syndrome and Early Onset Sarcoidosis are due to one of numerous possible gain-of-function mutations in NOD2, commonly presenting before age 5 with a triad of skin rash, arthritis, and uveitis. However, as more cases are reported, expanded clinical manifestations have been described. In systemic Sarcoidosis, there are numerous susceptibility genes that have been identified, and disease is thought to result from an environmental exposure in a genetically susceptible host. It most often presents with constitutional symptoms and pulmonary involvement and typically affects adolescents and adults. This paper reviews the similarities and differences between Blau syndrome and Sarcoidosis. We also discuss the importance of distinguishing between them, particularly with regard to prognosis and outcomes.

Ocular manifestations of Blau syndrome

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article summarizes the systemic and ocular manifestations of Blau syndrome, its genetic basis, and reviews recently published literature.

RECENT FINDINGS

A large multicenter prospective case series is underway, with 3-year preliminary results indicating the prevalence of uveitis, clinical characteristics and early data on its visual prognosis. Case reports have demonstrated the successful use of newer biologic agents.

SUMMARY

Blau syndrome is an exceedingly rare autoinflammatory disorder with skin, joint and eye manifestations. It is caused by autosomal dominant mutations of the NOD2 protein. Eye involvement is typically a chronic bilateral granulomatous iridocyclitis, often with multifocal choroiditis in the posterior segment. Treatment starts with topical and systemic steroids and often requires antimetabolites or biologic agents.

Cutaneous clues to diagnose autoinflammatory diseases

Systemic autoinflammatory diseases (AIDs) are a group of disorders characterized by recurrent episodes of systemic inflammation. Suspecting the diagnosis can be difficult and many of the clinical manifestations are common to different diseases. Although most of the cutaneous manifestations are non-specific, it is important to know them because sometimes they can lead to the diagnosis. The purpose of this review was to synthesize the main cutaneous lesions of autoinflammatory diseases to aid in their diagnosis.

The expanding pathways of autoinflammation: a lesson from the first 100 genes related to autoinflammatory manifestations

AutoInflammatory Diseases (AIDs) are a group of innate immune system disorders characterized by sterile inflammation without evidence of pathogenic autoantibodies or auto-reactive T lymphocytes. An expanding spectrum of genes and molecular pathways are associated with AIDs. Inflammasomopathies are secondary to dysregulation of multi-protein complexes, called inflammasomes, leading to an excessive maturation and secretion of IL1β and IL18. Patients present with persistent or recurrent systemic inflammation, abdominal and chest pain, skin rashes and are sensible to IL1 inhibitors. Unfolded proteins response causes a small number of AIDs that we propose to call immuno-proteinopathies, characterized by recurrent fevers and deep tissues inflammation. Other inflammatory conditions can occur in case of abnormalities of actin polymerization and the term of immuno-actinopathies is proposed. Generalized pustular psoriasis is a marker of autoinflammation mainly affecting the keratinocytes. Specific treatment targeting the p40 subunit of IL12 and IL23 or IL-17 are usually effective. Granulomatous inflammation characterizes AIDs related to NOD2 signaling defects. Defects in the ubiquitin-proteasome system cause a group of relopathies and some interferonopathies related to defect of the proteasome function (CANDLE syndrome). Gain of function of proteins regulating the production of type I interferons lead to severe inflammatory conditions, called interferonopathies. The JAK/STAT inhibitors are usually effective in these latter conditions. In conclusions, the identification of the main intracellular pathways involved in rare monogenic AIDs allows not only the proper classification of different conditions, but also highlight a pivotal role of possible novel therapeutic targets for the future.